Werner Company, Anniston, Alabama; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration, 40160 [E6-11083]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
40160
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 135 / Friday, July 14, 2006 / Notices
The Department as determined that
criterion (2) of section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
TA–W–59,283; Staktek Group L.P.,
Austin, TX: April 25, 2005.
TA–W–59,361; Columbian Chemicals
Co., Proctor, WV: May 8, 2005.
TA–W–59,364; Galileo International,
LLC, Travel Distribution Services
Division, Centennial, CO: May 4,
2005.
TA–W–59,411; Quadriga Art, Inc.,
Pennsauken, NJ: May 16, 2005.
The Department as determined that
criterion (3) of section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Since the workers of the firm are
denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
TA–W–59,382; C.M. Holtzinger Fruit Co.
Inc., Prosser, WA.
TA–W–59,443; Summit Knitting Mills,
Inc., Asheboro, NC.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production
to a foreign country) have not been met.
TA–W–59,419; Panel Processing, Inc.,
Alpena, MI.
TA–W–59,502; Culpepper Plastics Corp.,
Clinton, AR.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–59,151; Rowe Pottery Works,
Inc., Cambridge, WI.
TA–W–59,167; Tredegar Film Products,
LaGrange, GA.
TA–W–59,183; Gehl Company, West
Bend, WI.
TA–W–59,211; Franklin Farms, Inc.,
North Franklin, CT.
TA–W–59,292; GE Consumer and
Industrial Lighting Plant,
Willoughby, OH.
TA–W–59,309; Rich’s Rolling Pin, Inc.,
Pine Bluff, AR.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Jul 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
TA–W–59,351; Southern Oregon
Lumber, Central Point, OR.
TA–W–59,360; Smurfit Stone Container
Corp., Container Division,
Mansfield, MA.
TA–W–59,366; Yorktowne Cabinetry,
Cabinetry Division, Mifflinburg, PA.
TA–W–59,465; Saint Gobain Crystals,
Solon, OH.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
The investigation revealed that the
predominate cause of worker
separations is unrelated to criteria
(a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.C) (shift in production to a
foreign country).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
Werner Company, Anniston, Alabama.
The application did not contain new
information supporting a conclusion
that the determination was erroneous,
and also did not provide a justification
for reconsideration of the determination
that was based on either mistaken facts
or a misinterpretation of facts or of the
law. Therefore, dismissal of the
application was issued.
TA–W–59,424; Annalee Mobilitee Dolls,
Inc., Meredith, NH.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
TA–W–59,327; Stravina Operating Co.,
LLC, Chatsworth, CA.
TA–W–59,340; Billings Transportation
Group, Inc., Lexington, NC.
TA–W–59,340A; Billings Freight
Systems, Inc., Lexington, NC.
TA–W–59,340B; Billings Express, Inc.,
Atlanta, GA.
TA–W–59,374; Astec America, Inc.,
Product Support Group, Carlsbad,
CA.
TA–W–59,400; Factory Fabrics,
Cumberland, RI.
TA–W–59,487; LG Phillips Display USA,
Ann Harbor, MI.
The investigation revealed that
criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been
met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is not a supplier to or a downstream
producer for a firm whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for TAA.
TA–W–59,331; Orpack Stone Corp.,
Division of Smurfit Stone, Herrin,
IL.
TA–W–59,378; Crossroads Industries,
Inc., Gaylord, MI.
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the month of June 2006.
Copies of These determinations are
available for inspection in Room C–
5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210 during normal business hours
or will be mailed to persons who write
to the above address.
Dated: June 27, 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–11088 Filed 7–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,226]
Werner Company, Anniston, Alabama;
Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration
TA–W–59,226; Werner Company Anniston,
AL (June 22, 2006)
Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of
June 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–11083 Filed 7–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Proposed Collection, Comment
Request
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c) (2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. The Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) is soliciting comments
concerning the proposed revision of the
‘‘Telephone Point of Purchase Survey.’’
A copy of the proposed information
collection request (ICR) can be obtained
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 135 (Friday, July 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 40160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-11083]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-59,226]
Werner Company, Anniston, Alabama; Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Werner Company, Anniston, Alabama.
The application did not contain new information supporting a conclusion
that the determination was erroneous, and also did not provide a
justification for reconsideration of the determination that was based
on either mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of facts or of the law.
Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.
TA-W-59,226; Werner Company Anniston, AL (June 22, 2006)
Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of June 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6-11083 Filed 7-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
