In the Matter of Certain Personal Computers, Server Computers, and Components thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Joint Motion for Termination of Investigation Based on Settlement Agreement, 39688-39689 [06-6183]

Download as PDF 39688 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 134 / Thursday, July 13, 2006 / Notices (2) Designation of new Chair/Vice Chair; (3) Transportation Workers Identification Card (TWIC) regulations update; (4) Approval of the NMSAC Subject Matter Expert (SME) list; (5) Establishment of Maritime Transportation Government Coordinating Council (MGCC) and the Maritime Transportation Sector Coordinating Council (MSCC); and (6) Presentations on current maritime security initiatives. Procedural The meeting is open to the public. However, participation in NMSAC deliberations is limited to NMSAC members, Department of Homeland Security officials, and persons attending the meeting for special presentations. Please note that the meeting may close early if all business is finished. The Building is a secure facility so people attending should be ready to show a picture identification. At the Chair’s discretion, members of the public may make oral presentations during the meeting. If you would like to make an oral presentation at the meeting, please notify the Executive Secretary no later than July 14, 2006. If you would like a copy of your material distributed to each member of the Committee in advance of the meeting, please submit 25 copies to the Executive Secretary no later than July 14, 2006. Information on Services for Individuals With Disabilities For information on facilities or services for individuals with disabilities or to request special assistance at the meeting, contact the Executive Secretary as soon as possible. Dated: June 21, 2006. F.J. Sturm, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Office of Port and Vessel and Facility Security, Designated Federal Official, NMSAC. [FR Doc. E6–11000 Filed 7–12–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–15–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management Colorado: Filing of Plats of Survey sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES July 5, 2006. Summary: The plats of survey of the following described land will be officially filed in the Colorado State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Lakewood, Colorado, effective 10 a.m., July 5, 2006. All inquiries should be sent to the Colorado State Office (CO– VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:46 Jul 12, 2006 Jkt 208001 956), Bureau of Land Management, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215–7093. The plat and field notes, of Mineral Survey 20931, in protracted Township 45 North, Range 6 West, New Mexico Principal Meridian, Colorado, and was accepted on April 5, 2006. The supplemental plat of a portion of sections 7 and 8, Township 1 North, Range 71 West, of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado, creating new lot 100 in the NE1⁄4SE1⁄4 of section 7, and creating new lots 192 through 198, in the SW1⁄4 of section 8, was requested by the Canon City Field Office Land Surveyor and was accepted on April 12, 2006. The supplemental plat of the NW1⁄4 of Section 1, in Township 3 South, Range 73 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado, corrects the supplemental plat accepted May 6, 1963 by assigning new lot number 41, to the erroneously duplicated numbered lot 39. Lot 39 of section 1, had previously been created and depicted on the plats of the survey accepted May 19, 1930. This supplemental plat was requested by the Canon City Field Office and was accepted on April 17, 2006. The supplemental plat of section 22, in Township 1 North, Range 71 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado, creating new Lots 27 to 36 in the SW1⁄4 SW1⁄4 of Section 22, was requested by the Canon City Field Office, and was accepted on May 5, 2006. The plat and field notes, of the dependent resurvey in Section 9, Township 12 South, Range 71 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado, was requested by the Land Surveyor, Pike and San Isabel National Forests, in order to identify National Forest in conjunction with the Hayman Fire Rehabilitation Project, and was accepted on May 18, 2006. The plat and field notes of the dependent resurvey and survey, in Section 18, Township 33 North, Range 7 West, New Mexico Principal Meridian, Colorado, was requested by the Southern Ute Indian Tribe, in order to identify a portion of the mineral estate of Southern Ute tribal trust lands, and was accepted on June 13, 2006. The plat, of the entire record, of the dependent resurvey and survey, in Township 1 South, Range 72 West, and the plat (in two sheets) and field notes, of the dependent resurvey and survey in Township 1 North, Range 72 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado, was requested by the Land Surveyor, Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forest, in order to locate certain forest service boundaries that pertain to fuel reduction PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 projects in the James Creek area, and were accepted on June 19, 2006. The plat and field notes, of the dependent resurvey in Sections 11 and 14, Township 11 South, Range 69 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado, was requested by the Land Surveyor, Pike and San Isabel National Forests, in order to identify National Forest boundaries for proposed fuel reduction areas in the Manitou Experimental Forest, and was accepted on June 26, 2006. The plat and field notes, of the dependent resurveys and surveys, in Township 8 North, Range 95 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado, was requested, dated April 18, 2005, by the Little Snake Field Office, Craig, Colorado, in order to identify Public Land boundaries, and was accepted on June 26, 2006. Randall M. Zanon, Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado. [FR Doc. E6–11012 Filed 7–12–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–509] In the Matter of Certain Personal Computers, Server Computers, and Components thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Joint Motion for Termination of Investigation Based on Settlement Agreement U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’s’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) granting a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Crabb, Esq. Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5432. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM 13JYN1 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 134 / Thursday, July 13, 2006 / Notices Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted by the Commission on June 7, 2004, based on a complaint filed by Hewlett-Packard Company of Palo Alto, California (‘‘HP’’) under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337.69 FR 31844. The complainant alleged violations of section 337 in the importation and sale of certain personal computers, monitors, and components thereof, by reason of infringement of seven U.S. patents. HP named Gateway, Inc. of Poway, California (‘‘Gateway’’) as the sole respondent. On August 8, 2005, the ALJ issued a final ID on violation and his recommended determinations on remedy and bonding. Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,737,604, claims 1, 3–4, 6– 8, 18, 20–21, 23–25, 35, 37, 38, and 40– 42 of U.S. Patent No. 6,138,184 (‘‘the ‘184 patent’’), claim 9 of U.S. Patent No. 5,892,976 (‘‘ ‘976 patent’’), and claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 6,085,318 (‘‘the ‘318 patent’’) remained at issue in this investigation when the ALJ issued his final ID. On October 20, 2005, the Commission determined to review the final ID in its entirety. 70 FR 61157 (October 20, 2005). On December 8, 2005, the Commission issued notice that it had determined to reverse the ALJ’s finding of literal infringement with respect to claims 7, 24, and 41 of the ‘184 patent and claim 9 of the ‘976 patent, and to remand the investigation to the ALJ for additional findings concerning infringement under the doctrine of equivalents and a determination of whether the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement of section 337 had been met for the ‘184 and ‘976 patents. The Commission also determined to vacate that portion of the ID which concerned infringement of claim 1 of the ‘318 patent under the doctrine of equivalents. The Commission determined to affirm the remainder of the ID. On April 28, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 49) extending the target date for completion of the investigation to August 21, 2006. The Commission determined not to review Order No. 49. On May 25, 2006, the private parties filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation on the basis of a settlement VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:35 Jul 12, 2006 Jkt 208001 agreement. On June 13, 2006, the Commission investigative attorney riled a response in support of the parties’ joint motion to terminate the investigation. On June 20, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 50) granting the joint motion to terminate the investigation on the basis of the settlement agreement. No party filed a petition to review the subject ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ALJ’s ID. Accordingly, the above-referenced investigation is hereby terminated. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.21(b), and 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21, 210.42). By order of the Commission. Issued: July 7, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 06–6183 Filed 7–12–06; 8:45am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–547] In the Matter of Certain Personal Computers, Monitors, and Components Thereof; Notice of Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Joint Motion To Terminate the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on June 19, 2006, granting the joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation based on a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 205–3115. Copies of the public version of the ID and all nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 39689 Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. On August 10, 2005, the Commission instituted an investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on a complaint filed by Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P., of Houston, Texas, and Hewlett-Packard Company of Palo Alto, California (collectively, ‘‘HP’’) alleging a violation of section 337 in the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United States after importation of certain personal computers, monitors, and components thereof by reason of infringement of claims 4, 7–8, 12, 15, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,501,721; claims 1–17 of U.S. Patent No. 6,691,236; claims 1–26 of U.S. Patent No. 6,438,697; claims 1–8 and 23–33 of U.S. Patent No. 6,894,706; and claims 1– 33 of U.S. Patent No. 6,803,865. 70 FR 46544 (August 10, 2005). The complainant named Gateway, Inc. and eMachines, Inc., both of Irvine, California (collectively, ‘‘Gateway’’) as respondents. On May 25, 2006, HP and Gateway filed a joint motion for termination of the investigation based on a settlement agreement. On June 13, 2006, the Commission investigative attorney filed her response in support of the motion. On June 19, 2006, the presiding ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 13) granting the joint motion. No party petitioned for review of the ALJ’s ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ALJ’s ID. Accordingly, the investigation is terminated. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By order of the Commission. Issued: July 10, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–11026 Filed 7–12–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM 13JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 134 (Thursday, July 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39688-39689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6183]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-509]


In the Matter of Certain Personal Computers, Server Computers, 
and Components thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an 
Initial Determination Granting Joint Motion for Termination of 
Investigation Based on Settlement Agreement

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ's'') initial determination (``ID'') granting a joint 
motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation on the basis of a 
settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Crabb, Esq. Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5432. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its

[[Page 39689]]

Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this 
investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised 
that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted by the 
Commission on June 7, 2004, based on a complaint filed by Hewlett-
Packard Company of Palo Alto, California (``HP'') under section 337 of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337.69 FR 31844. The 
complainant alleged violations of section 337 in the importation and 
sale of certain personal computers, monitors, and components thereof, 
by reason of infringement of seven U.S. patents. HP named Gateway, Inc. 
of Poway, California (``Gateway'') as the sole respondent.
    On August 8, 2005, the ALJ issued a final ID on violation and his 
recommended determinations on remedy and bonding. Claim 1 of U.S. 
Patent No. 5,737,604, claims 1, 3-4, 6-8, 18, 20-21, 23-25, 35, 37, 38, 
and 40-42 of U.S. Patent No. 6,138,184 (``the `184 patent''), claim 9 
of U.S. Patent No. 5,892,976 (`` `976 patent''), and claim 1 of U.S. 
Patent No. 6,085,318 (``the `318 patent'') remained at issue in this 
investigation when the ALJ issued his final ID. On October 20, 2005, 
the Commission determined to review the final ID in its entirety. 70 FR 
61157 (October 20, 2005).
    On December 8, 2005, the Commission issued notice that it had 
determined to reverse the ALJ's finding of literal infringement with 
respect to claims 7, 24, and 41 of the `184 patent and claim 9 of the 
`976 patent, and to remand the investigation to the ALJ for additional 
findings concerning infringement under the doctrine of equivalents and 
a determination of whether the technical prong of the domestic industry 
requirement of section 337 had been met for the `184 and `976 patents. 
The Commission also determined to vacate that portion of the ID which 
concerned infringement of claim 1 of the `318 patent under the doctrine 
of equivalents. The Commission determined to affirm the remainder of 
the ID.
    On April 28, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 49) extending 
the target date for completion of the investigation to August 21, 2006. 
The Commission determined not to review Order No. 49.
    On May 25, 2006, the private parties filed a joint motion to 
terminate the investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement. On 
June 13, 2006, the Commission investigative attorney riled a response 
in support of the parties' joint motion to terminate the investigation.
    On June 20, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 50) granting the 
joint motion to terminate the investigation on the basis of the 
settlement agreement. No party filed a petition to review the subject 
ID.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ALJ's ID. 
Accordingly, the above-referenced investigation is hereby terminated.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.21(b), and 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21, 210.42).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: July 7, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-6183 Filed 7-12-06; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-M