Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From China and Korea, 39128-39129 [E6-10839]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
39128
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Notices
under Section 5703 of Title 5 of the
United States Code (U.S.C.).
The RPC provides advice related to
the performance of discretionary
functions under the laws governing the
Department’s management of Federal
and Indian mineral leases and revenues.
The RPC reviews and comments on
minerals revenue management and
other mineral-related policies and
provides a forum to convey views
representative of mineral lessees,
operators, revenue payors, revenue
recipients, governmental agencies, and
the interested public. The location and
dates of future RPC meetings and other
information will be published in the
Federal Register and posted on our
Internet Web site at https://
www.mms.gov/mmab/
RoyaltyPolicyCommittee/
rpc_homepage.htm. Meetings are open
to the public without advanced
registration, on a space-available basis.
The public may make statements during
the meetings, to the extent time permits,
and file written statements with the RPC
for its consideration. Copies of these
written statements should be submitted
to Ms. Dan. The RPC meetings are
conducted under the authority of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub.
L. 92–463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 1) and
the Office of Management and Budget
(Circular No. A–63, revised).
All correspondence, records, or
information received in response to this
notice are subject to disclosure under
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
All information provided will be made
public unless the respondent identifies
which portions are proprietary. Please
highlight the proprietary portions or
mark the page(s) that contain
proprietary data. Proprietary
information is protected by the Federal
Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act of
1982 (30 U.S.C. 1733), FOIA (5 U.S.C.
552(b)(4)), the Indian Minerals
Development Act of 1982 (25 U.S.C.
2103) and Department regulations (43
CFR part 2).
Dated: June 15, 2006.
Shirley M. Conway,
Acting Associate Director for Minerals
Revenue Management.
[FR Doc. E6–10767 Filed 7–10–06; 8:45 am]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–554]
In the Matter of Certain Axle Bearing
Assemblies, Components Thereof, and
Products Containing the Same; Notice
of a Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Terminating the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of
the presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’) granting the motion of
complainant and respondents to
terminate the investigation on the basis
of a settlement agreement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael K. Haldenstein, Esq., Office of
the General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3041. Copies of the public version
of the ALJ’s ID and all other
nonconfidential documents filed in
connection with this investigation are or
will be available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15
p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS–
ON–LINE) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on November 28, 2005, based on a
complaint filed pursuant to section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
19 U.S.C. 1337, by NTN Corporation of
Osaka, Japan (‘‘NTN’’). 70 FR 71330
(November 28, 2005). The complaint, as
supplemented, alleged violations of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain axle bearing
assemblies, components thereof, and
products containing the same by reason
of infringement of claim 1 of U.S. Patent
No. 5,620,263. The complaint further
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
alleged that an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337. The complainant
requested that the Commission issue a
limited exclusion order and a cease and
desist order. The Commission named
ILJIN Bearing of Gyeongju City,
Kyungbuk, Korea and ILJIN USA of
Novi, Michigan (collectively, ‘‘ILJIN’’) as
respondents in the investigation. 70 FR
at 71331. The ALJ set December 28,
2006 as the target date for completion of
the investigation. Order No. 3
(December 5, 2005). On December 21,
2005, the ALJ issued an ID replacing
ILJIN Bearing with ILJIN Global as a
respondent in the investigation. The
Commission determined not to review
that ID. 71 FR 3540 (January 23, 2006).
On June 12, 2006, complainant and
respondents filed a joint motion seeking
to terminate the investigation on the
basis of a settlement agreement. On June
13, 2006, the Commission investigative
attorney filed a response in support of
the motion to terminate.
On June 14, 2006, the ALJ issued the
subject ID (Order No. 28) granting the
parties’ joint motion and terminating the
investigation on the basis of a settlement
agreement. No petitions for review of
the ID were filed.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337,
and Commission rule 210.42, 19 CFR
210.42.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 6, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–10840 Filed 7–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1092 and 1093
(Final)]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From China and Korea
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigations, the United
States International Trade Commission
(Commission) determines, pursuant to
section 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act), that an
industry in the United States is not
materially injured or threatened with
material injury and the establishment of
an industry in the United States is not
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Notices
materially retarded, by reason of
imports from China and Korea of
diamond sawblades and parts thereof,
provided for in subheading 8202.39.00
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States, that have been found
by the Department of Commerce
(Commerce) to be sold in the United
States at less than fair value
(LTFV).2 thnsp;3
Background
The Commission instituted these
investigations effective May 3, 2005,
following receipt of a petition filed with
the Commission and Commerce by the
Diamond Sawblade Manufacturers’
Coalition (‘‘DSMC’’) and its individual
members: Blackhawk Diamond, Inc.,
Fullerton, CA; 4 Diamond B, Inc., Santa
Fe Springs, CA; Diamond Products,
Elyria, OH; Dixie Diamond, Lilburn, GA;
Hoffman Diamond, Punxsutawney, PA;
Hyde Manufacturing, Southbridge, MA;
Sanders Saws, Honey Brook, PA; Terra
Diamond, Salt Lake City, UT; and
Western Saw, Inc., Oxnard, CA. The
final phase of the investigations was
scheduled by the Commission following
notification of a preliminary
determination by Commerce that
imports of diamond sawblades and parts
thereof from China and Korea were
being sold at LTFV within the meaning
of section 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1673b(b)). Notice of the scheduling of
the final phase of the Commission’s
investigation and of a public hearing to
be held in connection therewith was
given by posting copies of the notice in
the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
Washington, DC, and by publishing the
notice in the Federal Register of January
20, 2006 (71 FR 3324). The hearing was
held in Washington, DC, on May 16,
2006, and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determination in these investigations to
the Secretary of Commerce on July 5,
2006. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 3862
(July 2006), entitled Diamond Products
and Parts Thereof from China and
Korea: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1092
and 1093 (Final).
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
By order of the Commission.
2 Vice Chairman Shara L. Aranoff and
Commissioner Jennifer A. Hillman dissenting.
3 When packaged together as a set for retail sale
with an item that is separately classified under
headings 8202 to 8205 of the HTS, diamond
sawblades or parts thereof may be imported under
HTS heading 8206.
4 Blackhawk Diamond ceased operations in
January 2006.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
Issued: July 5, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–10839 Filed 7–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
William G. Hamilton, Jr., M.D.;
Revocation of Registration
Procedural History
On July 23, 2004, the Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), issued an Order
to Show Cause to William G. Hamilton,
M.D. (Respondent), which proposed to
revoke his DEA Certificate of
Registration AH8873588, as a
practitioner, see 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3), and
to deny any pending applications for
renewal or modification. See 21 U.S.C.
823(f). As grounds for the proceeding,
the Show Cause Order alleged that on
March 3, 2004, the Medical Board of
California had suspended Respondent’s
state medical license and that
Respondent was without state
authorization to handle controlled
substances in that state. The Show
Cause Order notified Dr. Hamilton that
should no request for a hearing be filed
within 30 days, his hearing right would
be deemed waived.
On July 28, 2004, the Show Cause
Order was sent by certified mail to
Respondent at his home address in San
Diego, California. However, the letter
went unclaimed. On November 23,
2004, the Show Cause Order was sent
via regular mail to Respondent at the
same address, and on December 13,
2004, a DEA Diversion Investigator
personally served him with the Order.
At the time of personal service,
Respondent acknowledged that he had
received the Show Cause Order that was
mailed to him on November 23, 2004.
Subsequently, DEA has not received a
request for a hearing or any other reply
from Respondent or anyone purporting
to represent him in this matter.
Therefore, finding that: (1) Thirty
days have passed since the delivery of
the Order To Show Cause to
Respondent; and that (2) no request for
a hearing has been received, I conclude
that Respondent has waived his hearing
right. See James E. Thomas, M.D., 70 FR
3,564 (2005); Steven A. Barnes, M.D., 69
FR 51,474 (2004); David W. Linder, 67
FR 12,579 (2002). After considering
material from the investigative file in
this matter, this final order is entered
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39129
without a hearing pursuant to 21 CFR
1301.43(d) & (e), and § 1301.46.
Discussion
I find that Respondent is currently
registered with DEA as a practitioner
authorized to handle controlled
substances in Schedules III through V
under Certificate of Registration
AH8873588, with an expiration date of
October 31, 2005. Respondent’s
registration, however, has remained in
effect during these proceedings.
According to information in the
investigative file, on March 3, 2004, a
California State Administrative Law
Judge (ALJ) issued an Order, which
immediately suspended Respondent’s
Physician and Surgeon’s Certificate. The
suspension was based, in part, on the
ALJ’s finding that Respondent was
unable to safely practice medicine due
to a mental or physical condition. Since
then, I have become aware of further
proceedings involving Respondent’s
state medical license.
It has long been recognized that
‘‘[a]gencies may take official notice of
facts at any stage in a proceeding—even
in the final decision.’’ U.S. Dept. of
Justice, Attorney General’s Manual on
the Administrative Procedure Act 80
(1947) (Wm. W. Gaunt & Sons, Inc.,
Reprint 1979). Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 556(e) and 21 CFR 1316.59(e), I
hereby take official notice of the fact
that on May 12, 2005, the State of
California revoked Respondent’s
medical license.1
Respondent has submitted no
evidence showing that the State’s
revocation order has been stayed or
vacated. Therefore, I find that
Respondent is currently not authorized
to practice medicine in the State of
California, and that he is also without
authorization to handle controlled
substances in that state.
DEA does not have statutory authority
under the Controlled Substances Act to
issue or maintain a registration if the
applicant or registrant is without state
authority to handle controlled
substances in the State in which he
practices medicine. See 21 U.S.C.
802(21), 823(f), & 824(a)(3). This
prerequisite has been consistently
1 In accordance with the Administrative
Procedure Act and DEA’s regulations, Respondent
is ‘‘entitled on timely request, to an opportunity to
show to the contrary.’’ 5 U.S.C. 556(e). See also 21
CFR 1316.59(e). DEA’s regulations contain no
provision for requesting reconsideration of a final
order. See Robert A. Leslie, M.D., 60 FR 14004,
14005 (1995). To allow Respondent the opportunity
to refute the facts of which I am taking official
notice, publication of this final order shall be
withheld for a fifteen-day period, which shall begin
on the date of service by placing this order in the
mail.
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39128-39129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10839]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1092 and 1093 (Final)]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From China and Korea
Determination
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject
investigations, the United States International Trade Commission
(Commission) determines, pursuant to section 735(b) of the Tariff Act
of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act), that an industry in the United
States is not materially injured or threatened with material injury and
the establishment of an industry in the United States is not
[[Page 39129]]
materially retarded, by reason of imports from China and Korea of
diamond sawblades and parts thereof, provided for in subheading
8202.39.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that
have been found by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) to be sold in
the United States at less than fair value (LTFV).\2 3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
\2\ Vice Chairman Shara L. Aranoff and Commissioner Jennifer A.
Hillman dissenting.
\3\ When packaged together as a set for retail sale with an item
that is separately classified under headings 8202 to 8205 of the
HTS, diamond sawblades or parts thereof may be imported under HTS
heading 8206.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Commission instituted these investigations effective May 3,
2005, following receipt of a petition filed with the Commission and
Commerce by the Diamond Sawblade Manufacturers' Coalition (``DSMC'')
and its individual members: Blackhawk Diamond, Inc., Fullerton, CA; \4\
Diamond B, Inc., Santa Fe Springs, CA; Diamond Products, Elyria, OH;
Dixie Diamond, Lilburn, GA; Hoffman Diamond, Punxsutawney, PA; Hyde
Manufacturing, Southbridge, MA; Sanders Saws, Honey Brook, PA; Terra
Diamond, Salt Lake City, UT; and Western Saw, Inc., Oxnard, CA. The
final phase of the investigations was scheduled by the Commission
following notification of a preliminary determination by Commerce that
imports of diamond sawblades and parts thereof from China and Korea
were being sold at LTFV within the meaning of section 733(b) of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of the scheduling of the final phase of
the Commission's investigation and of a public hearing to be held in
connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission,
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register of
January 20, 2006 (71 FR 3324). The hearing was held in Washington, DC,
on May 16, 2006, and all persons who requested the opportunity were
permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Blackhawk Diamond ceased operations in January 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission transmitted its determination in these
investigations to the Secretary of Commerce on July 5, 2006. The views
of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3862 (July 2006),
entitled Diamond Products and Parts Thereof from China and Korea:
Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1092 and 1093 (Final).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 5, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-10839 Filed 7-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
