Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Lower the Minimum Display Size Requirement for Specialists To Maintain Undisplayed Reserve Interest at the Exchange Best Bid or Offer in the NYSE Hybrid Market, 38953 [E6-10716]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 131 / Monday, July 10, 2006 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.26
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–10718 Filed 7–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54086; File No. SR–NYSE–
2006–24]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change To
Lower the Minimum Display Size
Requirement for Specialists To
Maintain Undisplayed Reserve Interest
at the Exchange Best Bid or Offer in
the NYSE Hybrid Market
June 30, 2006.
On April 7, 2006, the New York Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to amend Exchange Rule
104(d)(i) to provide that specialists shall
have the ability to maintain undisplayed
reserve interest on behalf of the dealer
account at the Exchange best bid or offer
(‘‘BBO’’), provided at least 1,000 shares
of dealer interest is displayed at that
price, on the same side of the market as
the reserve interest. This proposed rule
change would lower the specialist’s
minimum display size requirement from
at least 2,000 shares to at least 1,000
shares at the Exchange BBO and would
conform the minimum display
requirements for reserve interest for
specialists and floor brokers.3 In
addition, the Exchange proposes to
make a conforming change to Exchange
Rule 104(d)(ii) to require that after an
execution at the Exchange BBO that
does not exhaust the specialist’s
interest, the specialist’s displayed
interest would be automatically
replenished from its reserve interest, if
any, so that at least a minimum of 1,000
shares is displayed (or whatever amount
remains if the reserve interest is less
than 1,000 shares). The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on May 16, 2006.4
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 NYSE permits floor brokers to maintain
undisplayed reserve interest at the Exchange BBO,
provided floor brokers display at least 1,000 shares.
See NYSE Rule 70.20(c)(ii).
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53780
(May 10, 2006), 71 FR 28398.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Jul 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
The Commission received no comments
regarding the proposal.
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
exchange, and, in particular, with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.5
Specifically, the Commission finds that
the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 6 in that
it is designed, among other things, to
promote just and equitable principle of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
The Commission previously approved
NYSE’s proposal to permit specialists
and floor brokers to maintain
undisplayed reserve interest at the
Exchange BBO, provided that they
display a minimum number of shares
and yield priority to all displayed
interest.7 In the Hybrid Market Order,
the Commission found it to be
consistent with the requirements of the
Act to allow specialists to place reserve
interest in the Display Book system
because it could increase the liquidity
available for execution at the Exchange
BBO. The Commission specifically
noted that the minimum size
requirement and the priority of
displayed interest over undisplayed
reserve interest should help ensure that
market participants continue to have an
incentive to display quotes or orders on
NYSE. The Commission stated that,
taken together, these requirements could
promote additional depth at the
Exchange BBO, while preserving
incentives for investors to display limit
orders. Since NYSE’s proposal would
retain the requirements that specialists
display a minimum amount of size at
the BBO in order to maintain
undisplayed reserve interest and that
undisplayed reserve interest yield
priority to displayed interest at that
price, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change remains
consistent with the requirements of the
Act.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,8 that the
5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). In approving this proposed rule
change, the Commission considered the proposed
rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53539
(March 22, 2006), 71 FR 16353 (March 31, 2006)
(‘‘Hybrid Market Order’’).
8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38953
proposed rule change (SR–NYSE–2006–
24) is hereby approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–10716 Filed 7–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54078; File No. SR–PCX–
2005–54]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc., Notice of Filing of Proposed
Rule Change and Amendment Nos. 1
and 2 Thereto Requiring OTP Holders
and OTP Firms To Participate in the
Federal Trade Commission’s National
Do-Not-Call Registry
June 30, 2006.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 18,
2006, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) 3 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. On May 26, 2006, NYSE
Arca filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.4 On June 21,
2006, NYSE Arca filed Amendment No.
2 to the proposed rule change.5 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
NYSE Arca proposes to amend NYSE
Arca Rule 9.20. The proposed rule
change would require OTP Holders and
9 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 On March 6, 2006, the Pacific Exchange, Inc.
filed a rule proposal, effective upon filing, to amend
its rules to reflect these name changes: from Pacific
Exchange, Inc. to NYSE Arca, Inc.; from PCX
Equities, Inc. to NYSE Arca Equities, Inc.; from PCX
Holdings, Inc., to NYSE Arca Holdings, Inc.; and
from the Archipelago Exchange, L.L.C. to NYSE
Arca, L.L.C. See File No. SR–PCX–2006–24 (March
6, 2006). This proposal has been amended to reflect
these name changes.
4 In Amendment No. 1, NYSE Arca partially
amended the text of proposed amended NYSE Arca
Rule 9.20 and made conforming and technical
changes to the original filing.
5 In Amendment No. 2, NYSE Arca made
additional changes to the text of proposed amended
NYSE Arca Rule 9.20 and to the original filing.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 131 (Monday, July 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 38953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10716]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-54086; File No. SR-NYSE-2006-24]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change To Lower the Minimum Display Size
Requirement for Specialists To Maintain Undisplayed Reserve Interest at
the Exchange Best Bid or Offer in the NYSE Hybrid Market
June 30, 2006.
On April 7, 2006, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend Exchange Rule 104(d)(i) to provide that
specialists shall have the ability to maintain undisplayed reserve
interest on behalf of the dealer account at the Exchange best bid or
offer (``BBO''), provided at least 1,000 shares of dealer interest is
displayed at that price, on the same side of the market as the reserve
interest. This proposed rule change would lower the specialist's
minimum display size requirement from at least 2,000 shares to at least
1,000 shares at the Exchange BBO and would conform the minimum display
requirements for reserve interest for specialists and floor brokers.\3\
In addition, the Exchange proposes to make a conforming change to
Exchange Rule 104(d)(ii) to require that after an execution at the
Exchange BBO that does not exhaust the specialist's interest, the
specialist's displayed interest would be automatically replenished from
its reserve interest, if any, so that at least a minimum of 1,000
shares is displayed (or whatever amount remains if the reserve interest
is less than 1,000 shares). The proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on May 16, 2006.\4\ The Commission
received no comments regarding the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ NYSE permits floor brokers to maintain undisplayed reserve
interest at the Exchange BBO, provided floor brokers display at
least 1,000 shares. See NYSE Rule 70.20(c)(ii).
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53780 (May 10,
2006), 71 FR 28398.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in
particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\5\
Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \6\ in that it is designed,
among other things, to promote just and equitable principle of trade,
to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). In approving this proposed rule change,
the Commission considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission previously approved NYSE's proposal to permit
specialists and floor brokers to maintain undisplayed reserve interest
at the Exchange BBO, provided that they display a minimum number of
shares and yield priority to all displayed interest.\7\ In the Hybrid
Market Order, the Commission found it to be consistent with the
requirements of the Act to allow specialists to place reserve interest
in the Display Book system because it could increase the liquidity
available for execution at the Exchange BBO. The Commission
specifically noted that the minimum size requirement and the priority
of displayed interest over undisplayed reserve interest should help
ensure that market participants continue to have an incentive to
display quotes or orders on NYSE. The Commission stated that, taken
together, these requirements could promote additional depth at the
Exchange BBO, while preserving incentives for investors to display
limit orders. Since NYSE's proposal would retain the requirements that
specialists display a minimum amount of size at the BBO in order to
maintain undisplayed reserve interest and that undisplayed reserve
interest yield priority to displayed interest at that price, the
Commission finds that the proposed rule change remains consistent with
the requirements of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53539 (March 22,
2006), 71 FR 16353 (March 31, 2006) (``Hybrid Market Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\8\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2006-24) is hereby
approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-10716 Filed 7-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P