Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc., Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto Requiring OTP Holders and OTP Firms To Participate in the Federal Trade Commission's National Do-Not-Call Registry, 38953-38957 [E6-10681]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 131 / Monday, July 10, 2006 / Notices For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.26 Nancy M. Morris, Secretary. [FR Doc. E6–10718 Filed 7–7–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–54086; File No. SR–NYSE– 2006–24] Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Lower the Minimum Display Size Requirement for Specialists To Maintain Undisplayed Reserve Interest at the Exchange Best Bid or Offer in the NYSE Hybrid Market June 30, 2006. On April 7, 2006, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to amend Exchange Rule 104(d)(i) to provide that specialists shall have the ability to maintain undisplayed reserve interest on behalf of the dealer account at the Exchange best bid or offer (‘‘BBO’’), provided at least 1,000 shares of dealer interest is displayed at that price, on the same side of the market as the reserve interest. This proposed rule change would lower the specialist’s minimum display size requirement from at least 2,000 shares to at least 1,000 shares at the Exchange BBO and would conform the minimum display requirements for reserve interest for specialists and floor brokers.3 In addition, the Exchange proposes to make a conforming change to Exchange Rule 104(d)(ii) to require that after an execution at the Exchange BBO that does not exhaust the specialist’s interest, the specialist’s displayed interest would be automatically replenished from its reserve interest, if any, so that at least a minimum of 1,000 shares is displayed (or whatever amount remains if the reserve interest is less than 1,000 shares). The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on May 16, 2006.4 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3 NYSE permits floor brokers to maintain undisplayed reserve interest at the Exchange BBO, provided floor brokers display at least 1,000 shares. See NYSE Rule 70.20(c)(ii). 4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53780 (May 10, 2006), 71 FR 28398. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:10 Jul 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 The Commission received no comments regarding the proposal. The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.5 Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 6 in that it is designed, among other things, to promote just and equitable principle of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Commission previously approved NYSE’s proposal to permit specialists and floor brokers to maintain undisplayed reserve interest at the Exchange BBO, provided that they display a minimum number of shares and yield priority to all displayed interest.7 In the Hybrid Market Order, the Commission found it to be consistent with the requirements of the Act to allow specialists to place reserve interest in the Display Book system because it could increase the liquidity available for execution at the Exchange BBO. The Commission specifically noted that the minimum size requirement and the priority of displayed interest over undisplayed reserve interest should help ensure that market participants continue to have an incentive to display quotes or orders on NYSE. The Commission stated that, taken together, these requirements could promote additional depth at the Exchange BBO, while preserving incentives for investors to display limit orders. Since NYSE’s proposal would retain the requirements that specialists display a minimum amount of size at the BBO in order to maintain undisplayed reserve interest and that undisplayed reserve interest yield priority to displayed interest at that price, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change remains consistent with the requirements of the Act. It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,8 that the 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53539 (March 22, 2006), 71 FR 16353 (March 31, 2006) (‘‘Hybrid Market Order’’). 8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). PO 00000 Frm 00112 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 38953 proposed rule change (SR–NYSE–2006– 24) is hereby approved. For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.9 Nancy M. Morris, Secretary. [FR Doc. E6–10716 Filed 7–7–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–54078; File No. SR–PCX– 2005–54] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc., Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto Requiring OTP Holders and OTP Firms To Participate in the Federal Trade Commission’s National Do-Not-Call Registry June 30, 2006. Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on May 18, 2006, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) 3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. On May 26, 2006, NYSE Arca filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.4 On June 21, 2006, NYSE Arca filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change.5 The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change NYSE Arca proposes to amend NYSE Arca Rule 9.20. The proposed rule change would require OTP Holders and 9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3 On March 6, 2006, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. filed a rule proposal, effective upon filing, to amend its rules to reflect these name changes: from Pacific Exchange, Inc. to NYSE Arca, Inc.; from PCX Equities, Inc. to NYSE Arca Equities, Inc.; from PCX Holdings, Inc., to NYSE Arca Holdings, Inc.; and from the Archipelago Exchange, L.L.C. to NYSE Arca, L.L.C. See File No. SR–PCX–2006–24 (March 6, 2006). This proposal has been amended to reflect these name changes. 4 In Amendment No. 1, NYSE Arca partially amended the text of proposed amended NYSE Arca Rule 9.20 and made conforming and technical changes to the original filing. 5 In Amendment No. 2, NYSE Arca made additional changes to the text of proposed amended NYSE Arca Rule 9.20 and to the original filing. 1 15 E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM 10JYN1 38954 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 131 / Monday, July 10, 2006 / Notices OTP Firms to participate in the Federal Trade Commission’s (‘‘FTC’’) national do-not-call registry. The current text of Arca Rule 9.20(b) would be deleted. The text of the proposed rule change is set forth below. Italics indicate new text. Rules of the NYSE Arca, Inc. RULE 9 CONDUCTING BUSINESS WITH THE PUBLIC sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES * * * * * Telemarketing 9.20(b) (1) General Telemarketing Requirements. No OTP Firm, OTP Holder or associated person shall make any telephone solicitation, as defined in Section 9.20(b)(10)(B) to: (A) Any residence of a person before the hour of 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. (local time at the called party’s location), unless: (i) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder has an established business relationship with the person pursuant to Section 9.20(b)(10)(A); (ii) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder has received that person’s prior express invitation or permission; or (iii) The person called is a broker or dealer. (B) Any person that previously has stated that he or she does not wish to receive an outbound telephone call made by or on behalf of the OTP Firm or OTP Holder; or (C) Any person who has registered his or her telephone number on the Federal Trade Commission’s national do-notcall registry. (2) National Do-Not-Call Registry Exceptions. An OTP Firm or OTP Holder will not be liable for violating Section 9.20(b)(1)(C) if: (A) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder has an established business relationship with the recipient of the call. A person’s request to be placed on an OTP Firm’s or OTP Holder’s firm-specific do-notcall list terminates the established business relationship exception to that national do-not-call registry provision for that OTP Firm or OTP Holder even if the person continues to do business with the OTP Firm or OTP Holder; (B) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder has obtained the person’s prior express invitation or permission. Such permission must be evidenced by a signed, written agreement between the person and the OTP Firm or OTP Holder that states that the person agrees to be contacted by the OTP Firm or OTP Holder and includes the telephone number to which the calls may be placed; or (C) The associated person making the call has a personal relationship with the recipient of the call. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:10 Jul 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 (3) Safe Harbor Provision. The OTP Firm, OTP Holder or associated person making telephone solicitations will not be liable for violating Section 9.20(b)(1)(C) if the OTP Firm, OTP Holder or associated person demonstrates that the violation is the result of an error and that as part of the OTP Firm’s or OTP Holder’s routine business practice it meets the following standards: (A) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder has established and implemented written procedures to comply with the national do-not-call rules; (B) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder has trained its personnel, and any entity assisting in its compliance, in procedures established pursuant to the national do-not-call rules; (C) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder has maintained and recorded a list of telephone numbers that it may not contact; and (D) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder uses a process to prevent telephone solicitations to any telephone number on any list established pursuant to the do-not-call rules, employing a version of the national do-not-call registry obtained from the administrator of the registry no more than thirty-one (31) days prior to the date any call is made, and maintains records documenting this process. (4) Procedures. Prior to engaging in telemarketing, an OTP Firm or OTP Holder must institute procedures to comply with Section 9.20(b)(1). Such procedures must meet the minimum standards: (A) Written policy. The OTP Firm or OTP Holder must have a written policy available upon demand for maintaining a do-not-call list. (B) Training of personnel engaged in telemarketing. Personnel engaged in any aspect of telemarketing must be informed and trained in the existence and use of the do-not-call list, including the policies and procedures of the firm regarding communication with the public. (C) Recording, honoring do-not-call requests. If an OTP Firm or OTP Holder receives a request from a person not to receive calls from that OTP Firm or OTP Holder, the OTP Firm or OTP Holder must record the request and place the person’s name, if provided, and telephone number on the firm’s do-notcall list at the time the request is made. The OTP Firm or OTP Holder must honor a person’s do-not-call request within a reasonable time from the date such request is made. This period may not exceed 30 days from the date of such request. If such requests are being recorded or maintained by a party other PO 00000 Frm 00113 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 than the OTP Firm or OTP Holder on whose behalf the telemarketing call is made, the OTP Firm or OTP Holder on whose behalf the telemarketing call is made will be liable for any failure to honor the do-not-call request. (D) Identification of sellers and telemarketers. An OTP Firm or OTP Holder or person associated with an OTP Firm or OTP Holder making a call for telemarketing purposes must provide the called party with the name of the individual caller, the name of the OTP Firm or OTP Holder, an address or telephone number at which the OTP Firm or OTP Holder may be contacted, and that the purpose of the call is to solicit the purchase or sale of securities or a related service. The telephone number provided may not be a 900 number or any other number for which charges exceed local or long distance transmission charges. (E) Affiliated persons or entities. In the absence of a specific request by the person to the contrary, a person’s donot-call request shall apply to the OTP Firm or OTP Holder making the call, and will not apply to affiliated entities unless the consumer reasonably would expect them to be included given the identification of the caller and the product or service being advertised. (F) Maintenance of do-not-call lists. An OTP Firm or OTP Holder making calls for telemarketing purposes must maintain a record of the caller’s request not to receive further telemarketing calls. A firm-specific do-not-call request must be honored for five years from the time the request is made. (5) Wireless Communications. (A) OTP Firms and OTP Holders are prohibited from using an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice when initiating a telephone call to any telephone number assigned to a paging service, cellular telephone service, specialized mobile radio service, or other radio common carrier service, or any service for which the called party is charged for the call. (B) The provisions set forth in this rule are applicable to OTP Firms and OTP Holders telemarketing or making telephone solicitations calls to wireless telephone numbers. (6) Outsourcing Telemarketing. If an OTP Firm or OTP Holder uses another entity to perform telemarketing services on its behalf, the OTP Firm or OTP Holder remains responsible for ensuring compliance with all provisions contained in this rule. (7) Pre-Recorded Messages. (A) An OTP Firm or OTP Holder may not initiate any telephone call to any residence using an artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver a message, E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM 10JYN1 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 131 / Monday, July 10, 2006 / Notices without the prior express consent of the person called, unless the call: (i) Is not made for a commercial purpose; (ii) Is made for a commercial purpose, but does not include or introduce an unsolicited advertisement or constitute a telephone solicitation; or (iii) Is made to any person with whom the OTP Firm or OTP Holder has an established business relationship at the time the call is made. (B) All artificial or prerecorded telephone messages shall: (i) At the beginning of the message, state clearly the identity of the OTP Firm or OTP Holder that is responsible for initiating the call. The OTP Firm or OTP Holder responsible for initiating the call must state the name under which the OTP Firm or OTP Holder is registered to conduct business with the applicable State Corporation Commission (or comparable regulatory authority); and (ii) During or after the message, the OTP Firm or OTP Holder must state clearly the telephone number (other than that of the autodialer or prerecorded message player that placed the call) of such OTP Firm or OTP Holder. The telephone number provided may not be a 900 number or any other number for which charges exceed local or long distance transmission charges. (iii) For telemarketing messages to a residence, such telephone number, mentioned in Section 9.20(b)(7)(B)(ii) above, must permit any person to make a do-not-call request during regular business hours for the duration of the telemarketing campaign. (8) Telephone Facsimile or Computer Advertisements No OTP Firm, OTP Holder or associated person may use a telephone facsimile machine, computer or other device to send an unsolicited advertisement to a telephone facsimile machine, computer or other device. (A) For purposes of Section 9.20(b)(8) of this rule, a facsimile advertisement is not ‘‘unsolicited’’ if the recipient has granted the OTP Firm, OTP Holder or associated person prior express invitation or permission to deliver the advertisement. Such express invitation or permission must be evidenced by a signed, written statement that includes the facsimile number to which any advertisements may be sent and clearly indicates the recipient’s consent to receive such facsimile advertisements from the OTP Firm, OTP Holder or associated person. (B) OTP Firms, OTP Holders and associated persons must clearly mark, in a margin at the top or bottom of each page of the transmission, the date and VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:10 Jul 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 time it is sent and an identification of the OTP Firm, OTP Holder or associated person sending the message and the telephone number of the sending machine or of the OTP Firm, OTP Holder or associated person sending the transmission. (9) Caller Identification Information (A) Any OTP Firm or OTP Holder that engages in telemarketing, as defined in Section 9.20(b)(10)(B) of this rule, must transmit caller identification information. Such caller identification information must include either the Calling Party Number (‘‘CPN’’) or the calling party’s billing number, also known as the Charge Number (‘‘ANI’’), and, when available from the telephone carrier, the name of the OTP Firm or OTP Holder. The telephone number so provided must permit any person to make a do-not-call request during regular business hours. Whenever possible, CPN is the preferred number and should be transmitted. (B) Any OTP Firm or OTP Holder that engages in telemarketing, as defined in Section 9.20(b)(10)(B) of this rule, is prohibited from blocking the transmission of caller identification information. (C) Provision of caller identification information does not obviate the requirement for a caller to verbally supply identification information during a call. (10) Definitions. (A) For purposes of Section 9.20, an OTP Firm or OTP Holder has an ‘‘established business relationship’’ with a person if: (i) The person has made a financial transaction or has a security position, a money balance, or account activity with the OTP Firm or OTP Holder or at a clearing firm that provides clearing services to such OTP Firm or OTP Holder within the previous 18 months immediately preceding the date of the telemarketing call; (ii) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder is the broker-dealer of record for an account of the person within the previous 18 months immediately preceding the date of the telemarketing call; or (iii) The person has contacted the OTP Firm or OTP Holder to inquire about a product service offered by the OTP Firm or OTP Holder within the previous three months immediately preceding the date of the telemarketing call, which relationship has not been previously terminated by either party. A person’s established business relationship with an OTP Firm or OTP Holder does not extend to the OTP Firm’s or OTP Holder’s affiliated entities unless the person would reasonably PO 00000 Frm 00114 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 38955 expect them to be included, given the nature and type of products or services offered by the affiliate and the identity of the affiliate. Similarly, a person’s established business relationship with an OTP Firm’s or Holder’s affiliate does not extend to the OTP Firm or OTP Holder unless the person would reasonably expect the OTP Firm or OTP Holder to be included. A person’s request to be placed on an OTP Firm’s or OTP Holder’s firm-specific do-notcall list as set forth in Section 9.20(b)(1)(B) of this rule terminates an established business relationship for purposes of telemarketing and telephone solicitation, even if the person continues to do business with the OTP Holder or OTP Firm. (B) The terms ‘‘telemarketing’’ and ‘‘telephone solicitation’’ mean the initiation of a telephone call or message for the purpose of encouraging the purchase or rental of, or investment in, property, goods, or services, which is transmitted to any person. (C) The term ‘‘personal relationship’’ means any family member, friend or acquaintance of the telemarketer making the call. (D) The term ‘‘account activity’’ shall include, but not be limited to, purchases, sales, interest credits or debits, charges or credits, dividend payments, transfer activity, securities receipts or deliveries, and/or journal entries relating to securities or funds in the possession or control of the OTP Firm or OTP Holder. (E) The term ‘‘broker-dealer of record’’ refers to the broker-dealer identified on a customer’s account application for accounts held directly at a mutual fund or variable insurance product issuer. (F) The terms ‘‘automatic telephone dialing system’’ and ‘‘autodialer’’ mean equipment which has the capacity to store or produce telephone numbers to be called using a random or sequential number generator and to dial such numbers. (G) The term ‘‘telephone facsimile machine’’ means equipment which has the capacity to transcribe text or images (or both) from paper, into an electronic signal and to transmit that signal over a regular telephone line, or to transcribe text or images (or both) from an electronic signal received over a regular telephone line onto paper. (H) The term ‘‘unsolicited advertisement’’ means any material advertising the commercial availability or quality of any products or services which is transmitted to any person without that person’s prior express invitation or permission. Rule 9.20(c)-(d)—No Change. * * * * * E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM 10JYN1 38956 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 131 / Monday, July 10, 2006 / Notices II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B) and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 1. Purpose The purpose of this Amendment No. 2 is to make the proposed rule consistent with NYSE Rule 404A by including provisions concerning general telemarketing requirements, procedures, wireless communications, outsourcing telemarketing, pre-recorded messages, telephone facsimile or computer advertisements and caller identification. This Amendment No. 2 replaces the original filing in its entirety. In 2003, the FTC, via its Telemarketing Sales Rule, and the Federal Communications Commission (‘‘FCC’’), via its Miscellaneous Rules Relating to Common Carriers, established requirements for sellers and telemarketers to participate in a national do-not-call registry.6 Since June 2003, consumers have been able to enter their home telephone numbers into the national do-not-call registry, which is maintained by the FTC. Under rules of the FTC and FCC, sellers and telemarketers generally are prohibited from making telephone solicitations to consumers whose numbers are listed in the national do-not-call registry. The FCC’s do-not-call rules apply to brokerdealers while the FTC’s rules do not.7 In February 2005, the SEC requested that NYSE Arca adopt the proposed telemarketing rules to require OTP 6 The do-not-call rules of the FCC and FTC are very similar in terms of substance, in part, because Congress directed the FCC to consult with the FTC to maximize consistency between their respective do-not-call rules. See The Do-Not-Call Implementation Act, 108 Public Law 10, 117 Stat. 557 (March 11, 2003). 7 See 15 U.S.C. 6102(d)(2)(A), which provides that ‘‘The Rules promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission under subsection (a) shall not apply to * * * [among other persons, brokers or dealers]. * * *’’ The FTC’s rules were not promulgated under 15 U.S.C. 6102. The FCC’s rules are not subject to this limitation and apply to all sellers and telemarketers. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:10 Jul 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 Holders and OTP Firms to participate in the do-not-call registry.8 Because broker-dealers are subject to the FCC’s do-not-call rules, NYSE Arca modeled its rules in this area after those of the FCC and codified these do-not-call requirements in NYSE Arca Rule 9.20(b), with minor modifications tailoring the rules to broker-dealer activities and the securities industry. Current NYSE Arca Rule 9.20(b) will be deleted and replaced in its entirety with proposed Rule 9.20(b) set forth in Exhibit 5. Safe Harbor Provision for the National Do-Not-Call Registry Requirements The FCC and FTC each provided persons subject to their respective donot-call rules a ‘‘safe harbor’’ providing that a seller or telemarketer is not liable for a violation of the do-not-call rules that is the result of an error if the seller or telemarketer’s routine business practice meets certain standards. The Exchange has provided a parallel safe harbor in paragraph (3) of proposed NYSE Arca Rule 9.20(b); the safe harbor is limited the requirements of paragraph (1)(C) of proposed NYSE Arca Rule 9.20(b), which prohibits an OTP Firm, OTP Holder or associated person from initiating any telephone solicitation to any person who has registered his or her phone number with the national do-notcall registry. To be eligible for this proposed NYSE Arca Rule 9.20(b) safe harbor, an OTP Holder or OTP Firm must demonstrate that the OTP Holder’s or OTP Firm’s routine business practice meets four standards in proposed Rule 9.20(b). First, the OTP Holder or OTP Firm must have established and implemented written procedures to comply with the national do-not-call rules. Second, the OTP Holder or OTP Firm must have trained its personnel, and any entity assisting it in its compliance, in procedures established pursuant to the national do-not-call rules. Third, the OTP Holder or OTP Firm must have maintained and recorded a list of telephone numbers that the OTP Holder or OTP Firm may not contact. Fourth, the OTP Holder or OTP Firm must use a process to prevent telephone solicitations to any telephone number on any list established pursuant to the do-not-call rules, employing a version of the national do-not-call registry obtained from the FTC no more than 8 The Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act of 1994 (codified at 15 U.S.C. 6102) requires the SEC to promulgate telemarketing rules substantially similar to those of the FTC or to direct self-regulatory organizations to promulgate such rules unless the SEC determines that such rules are not in the interest of investor protection. PO 00000 Frm 00115 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 thirty-one (31) days prior to the date any call is made, and must maintain records documenting this process. Other Provisions This Amendment No. 2 includes additional provisions concerning general telemarketing requirements, procedures, wireless communications, outsourcing telemarketing, pre-recorded messages, telephone facsimile or computer advertisements and caller identification. Proposed Section 9.20(b)(1) outlines the General Telemarketing Requirements specifying when OTP Holders, OTP Firms and associated persons may not contact residences and certain persons. Proposed Section 9.20(b)(2) provides an exception for calling a person on the national do-not-call registry if the OTP Holder or OTP Firm has the person’s permission to make calls, or if the OTP Holder or OTP Firm has an established business relationship with the person. Proposed Section 9.20(b)(4) sets forth the procedures that OTP Firms or OTP Holders must institute to comply with the General Telemarketing Requirements set forth in Section 9.20(b)(1). Proposed Section 9.20(b)(5) sets forth when OTP Firms and OTP Holders are prohibited from using wireless communications. Proposed Section 9.20(b)(6) sets forth the requirement that OTP Firms and OTP Holders outsourcing telemarketing remain responsible for compliance with Section 9.20(b). Proposed Section 9.20(b)(7) sets forth the requirements that OTP Firms and OTP Holders must satisfy to utilize pre-recorded messages. Proposed Section 9.20(b)(8) prohibits OTP Firms, OTP Holders or associated person from using a telephone facsimile machine, computer or other device to send unsolicited advertisements to a telephone facsimile machine, computer or other device. Finally, proposed Section 9.20(b)(9) sets forth the requirement that OTP Firms and OTP Holders engaging in telemarketing must transmit caller identification information. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b) of the Exchange Act 9 in general, and furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(5) 10 in particular, because it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The 9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 10 15 E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM 10JYN1 38957 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 131 / Monday, July 10, 2006 / Notices Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will increase the protection of investors by enabling investors who do not want to receive telephone solicitations from OTP Firms or OTP Holders to receive the benefits and protections of the national do-not-call registry. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited nor received by the Exchange. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (A) By order approve such rule change, or (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Electronic Comments sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. • Please include File Number SR– PCX–2005–54 on the subject line. • Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. Jkt 208001 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–54079; File No. SR–PCX– 2005–97] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc., Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto Requiring ETP Holders To Participate in the Federal Trade Commission’s National Do-Not-Call Registry June 30, 2006. Paper Comments 17:10 Jul 07, 2006 For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.11 Nancy M. Morris, Secretary. [FR Doc. E6–10681 Filed 7–7–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010–01–P Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the Exchange Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: VerDate Aug<31>2005 All submissions should refer to File Number SR–PCX–2005–54. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission’s Public Reference Section, Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–PCX– 2005–54 and should be submitted on or before July 31, 2006. Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on May 18, 2006, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or PO 00000 11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 Frm 00116 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ‘‘Exchange’’) 3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. On May 26, 2006, NYSE Arca filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.4 On June 21, 2006, NYSE Arca filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change.5 The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange, through its whollyowned subsidiary NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca Equities’’ or the ‘‘Corporation’’), proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 9.20. The proposed rule change would require ETP Holders to participate in the Federal Trade Commission’s (‘‘FTC’’) national do-not-call registry. The current text of Arca Equities Rule 9.20(b) would be deleted. The text of the proposed rule change is set forth below. Italics indicate new text. NYSE Arca Equities Rules RULE 9 CONDUCTING BUSINESS WITH THE PUBLIC * * * * * Telemarketing 9.20(b) (1) General Telemarketing Requirements. No ETP Holder or associated person shall make any telephone solicitation, as defined in Section 9.20(b)(10)(B) to: (A) Any residence of a person before the hour of 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. (local time at the called party’s location), unless: (i) The ETP Holder has an established business relationship with the person pursuant to Section 9.20(b)(10)(A); (ii) The ETP Holder has received that person’s prior express invitation or permission; or 3 On March 6, 2006, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. filed a rule proposal, effective upon filing, to amend its rules to reflect these name changes: from Pacific Exchange, Inc. to NYSE Arca, Inc.; from PCX Equities, Inc. to NYSE Arca Equities, Inc.; from PCX Holdings, Inc., to NYSE Arca Holdings, Inc.; and from the Archipelago Exchange, L.L.C. to NYSE Arca, L.L.C. See File No. SR–PCX–2006–24 (March 6, 2006). This proposal has been amended to reflect these name changes. 4 In Amendment No. 1, NYSE Arca partially amended the text of proposed amended NYSE Arca Equities Rule 9.20 and made conforming and technical changes to the original filing. 5 In Amendment No. 2, NYSE Arca made additional changes to the text of proposed amended NYSE Arca Equities Rule 9.20 and to the original filing. E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM 10JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 131 (Monday, July 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38953-38957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10681]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-54078; File No. SR-PCX-2005-54]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc., Notice of Filing 
of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto Requiring 
OTP Holders and OTP Firms To Participate in the Federal Trade 
Commission's National Do-Not-Call Registry

June 30, 2006.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on May 18, 2006, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or ``Exchange'') 
\3\ filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' 
or ``SEC'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and 
III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. On May 26, 2006, NYSE Arca filed Amendment No. 1 to the 
proposed rule change.\4\ On June 21, 2006, NYSE Arca filed Amendment 
No. 2 to the proposed rule change.\5\ The Commission is publishing this 
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested 
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ On March 6, 2006, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. filed a rule 
proposal, effective upon filing, to amend its rules to reflect these 
name changes: from Pacific Exchange, Inc. to NYSE Arca, Inc.; from 
PCX Equities, Inc. to NYSE Arca Equities, Inc.; from PCX Holdings, 
Inc., to NYSE Arca Holdings, Inc.; and from the Archipelago 
Exchange, L.L.C. to NYSE Arca, L.L.C. See File No. SR-PCX-2006-24 
(March 6, 2006). This proposal has been amended to reflect these 
name changes.
    \4\ In Amendment No. 1, NYSE Arca partially amended the text of 
proposed amended NYSE Arca Rule 9.20 and made conforming and 
technical changes to the original filing.
    \5\ In Amendment No. 2, NYSE Arca made additional changes to the 
text of proposed amended NYSE Arca Rule 9.20 and to the original 
filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    NYSE Arca proposes to amend NYSE Arca Rule 9.20. The proposed rule 
change would require OTP Holders and

[[Page 38954]]

OTP Firms to participate in the Federal Trade Commission's (``FTC'') 
national do-not-call registry. The current text of Arca Rule 9.20(b) 
would be deleted. The text of the proposed rule change is set forth 
below. Italics indicate new text.

Rules of the NYSE Arca, Inc.

RULE 9 CONDUCTING BUSINESS WITH THE PUBLIC

* * * * *

Telemarketing

    9.20(b) (1) General Telemarketing Requirements. No OTP Firm, OTP 
Holder or associated person shall make any telephone solicitation, as 
defined in Section 9.20(b)(10)(B) to:
    (A) Any residence of a person before the hour of 8 a.m. or after 9 
p.m. (local time at the called party's location), unless:
    (i) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder has an established business 
relationship with the person pursuant to Section 9.20(b)(10)(A);
    (ii) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder has received that person's prior 
express invitation or permission; or
    (iii) The person called is a broker or dealer.
    (B) Any person that previously has stated that he or she does not 
wish to receive an outbound telephone call made by or on behalf of the 
OTP Firm or OTP Holder; or
    (C) Any person who has registered his or her telephone number on 
the Federal Trade Commission's national do-not-call registry.
    (2) National Do-Not-Call Registry Exceptions. An OTP Firm or OTP 
Holder will not be liable for violating Section 9.20(b)(1)(C) if:
    (A) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder has an established business 
relationship with the recipient of the call. A person's request to be 
placed on an OTP Firm's or OTP Holder's firm-specific do-not-call list 
terminates the established business relationship exception to that 
national do-not-call registry provision for that OTP Firm or OTP Holder 
even if the person continues to do business with the OTP Firm or OTP 
Holder;
    (B) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder has obtained the person's prior 
express invitation or permission. Such permission must be evidenced by 
a signed, written agreement between the person and the OTP Firm or OTP 
Holder that states that the person agrees to be contacted by the OTP 
Firm or OTP Holder and includes the telephone number to which the calls 
may be placed; or
    (C) The associated person making the call has a personal 
relationship with the recipient of the call.
    (3) Safe Harbor Provision. The OTP Firm, OTP Holder or associated 
person making telephone solicitations will not be liable for violating 
Section 9.20(b)(1)(C) if the OTP Firm, OTP Holder or associated person 
demonstrates that the violation is the result of an error and that as 
part of the OTP Firm's or OTP Holder's routine business practice it 
meets the following standards:
    (A) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder has established and implemented 
written procedures to comply with the national do-not-call rules;
    (B) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder has trained its personnel, and any 
entity assisting in its compliance, in procedures established pursuant 
to the national do-not-call rules;
    (C) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder has maintained and recorded a list 
of telephone numbers that it may not contact; and
    (D) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder uses a process to prevent telephone 
solicitations to any telephone number on any list established pursuant 
to the do-not-call rules, employing a version of the national do-not-
call registry obtained from the administrator of the registry no more 
than thirty-one (31) days prior to the date any call is made, and 
maintains records documenting this process.
    (4) Procedures. Prior to engaging in telemarketing, an OTP Firm or 
OTP Holder must institute procedures to comply with Section 9.20(b)(1). 
Such procedures must meet the minimum standards:
    (A) Written policy. The OTP Firm or OTP Holder must have a written 
policy available upon demand for maintaining a do-not-call list.
    (B) Training of personnel engaged in telemarketing. Personnel 
engaged in any aspect of telemarketing must be informed and trained in 
the existence and use of the do-not-call list, including the policies 
and procedures of the firm regarding communication with the public.
    (C) Recording, honoring do-not-call requests. If an OTP Firm or OTP 
Holder receives a request from a person not to receive calls from that 
OTP Firm or OTP Holder, the OTP Firm or OTP Holder must record the 
request and place the person's name, if provided, and telephone number 
on the firm's do-not-call list at the time the request is made. The OTP 
Firm or OTP Holder must honor a person's do-not-call request within a 
reasonable time from the date such request is made. This period may not 
exceed 30 days from the date of such request. If such requests are 
being recorded or maintained by a party other than the OTP Firm or OTP 
Holder on whose behalf the telemarketing call is made, the OTP Firm or 
OTP Holder on whose behalf the telemarketing call is made will be 
liable for any failure to honor the do-not-call request.
    (D) Identification of sellers and telemarketers. An OTP Firm or OTP 
Holder or person associated with an OTP Firm or OTP Holder making a 
call for telemarketing purposes must provide the called party with the 
name of the individual caller, the name of the OTP Firm or OTP Holder, 
an address or telephone number at which the OTP Firm or OTP Holder may 
be contacted, and that the purpose of the call is to solicit the 
purchase or sale of securities or a related service. The telephone 
number provided may not be a 900 number or any other number for which 
charges exceed local or long distance transmission charges.
    (E) Affiliated persons or entities. In the absence of a specific 
request by the person to the contrary, a person's do-not-call request 
shall apply to the OTP Firm or OTP Holder making the call, and will not 
apply to affiliated entities unless the consumer reasonably would 
expect them to be included given the identification of the caller and 
the product or service being advertised.
    (F) Maintenance of do-not-call lists. An OTP Firm or OTP Holder 
making calls for telemarketing purposes must maintain a record of the 
caller's request not to receive further telemarketing calls. A firm-
specific do-not-call request must be honored for five years from the 
time the request is made.
    (5) Wireless Communications.
    (A) OTP Firms and OTP Holders are prohibited from using an 
automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded 
voice when initiating a telephone call to any telephone number assigned 
to a paging service, cellular telephone service, specialized mobile 
radio service, or other radio common carrier service, or any service 
for which the called party is charged for the call.
    (B) The provisions set forth in this rule are applicable to OTP 
Firms and OTP Holders telemarketing or making telephone solicitations 
calls to wireless telephone numbers.
    (6) Outsourcing Telemarketing. If an OTP Firm or OTP Holder uses 
another entity to perform telemarketing services on its behalf, the OTP 
Firm or OTP Holder remains responsible for ensuring compliance with all 
provisions contained in this rule.
    (7) Pre-Recorded Messages.
    (A) An OTP Firm or OTP Holder may not initiate any telephone call 
to any residence using an artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver a 
message,

[[Page 38955]]

without the prior express consent of the person called, unless the 
call:
    (i) Is not made for a commercial purpose;
    (ii) Is made for a commercial purpose, but does not include or 
introduce an unsolicited advertisement or constitute a telephone 
solicitation; or
    (iii) Is made to any person with whom the OTP Firm or OTP Holder 
has an established business relationship at the time the call is made.
    (B) All artificial or prerecorded telephone messages shall:
    (i) At the beginning of the message, state clearly the identity of 
the OTP Firm or OTP Holder that is responsible for initiating the call. 
The OTP Firm or OTP Holder responsible for initiating the call must 
state the name under which the OTP Firm or OTP Holder is registered to 
conduct business with the applicable State Corporation Commission (or 
comparable regulatory authority); and
    (ii) During or after the message, the OTP Firm or OTP Holder must 
state clearly the telephone number (other than that of the autodialer 
or prerecorded message player that placed the call) of such OTP Firm or 
OTP Holder. The telephone number provided may not be a 900 number or 
any other number for which charges exceed local or long distance 
transmission charges.
    (iii) For telemarketing messages to a residence, such telephone 
number, mentioned in Section 9.20(b)(7)(B)(ii) above, must permit any 
person to make a do-not-call request during regular business hours for 
the duration of the telemarketing campaign.
    (8) Telephone Facsimile or Computer Advertisements
    No OTP Firm, OTP Holder or associated person may use a telephone 
facsimile machine, computer or other device to send an unsolicited 
advertisement to a telephone facsimile machine, computer or other 
device.
    (A) For purposes of Section 9.20(b)(8) of this rule, a facsimile 
advertisement is not ``unsolicited'' if the recipient has granted the 
OTP Firm, OTP Holder or associated person prior express invitation or 
permission to deliver the advertisement. Such express invitation or 
permission must be evidenced by a signed, written statement that 
includes the facsimile number to which any advertisements may be sent 
and clearly indicates the recipient's consent to receive such facsimile 
advertisements from the OTP Firm, OTP Holder or associated person.
    (B) OTP Firms, OTP Holders and associated persons must clearly 
mark, in a margin at the top or bottom of each page of the 
transmission, the date and time it is sent and an identification of the 
OTP Firm, OTP Holder or associated person sending the message and the 
telephone number of the sending machine or of the OTP Firm, OTP Holder 
or associated person sending the transmission.
    (9) Caller Identification Information 
    (A) Any OTP Firm or OTP Holder that engages in telemarketing, as 
defined in Section 9.20(b)(10)(B) of this rule, must transmit caller 
identification information. Such caller identification information must 
include either the Calling Party Number (``CPN'') or the calling 
party's billing number, also known as the Charge Number (``ANI''), and, 
when available from the telephone carrier, the name of the OTP Firm or 
OTP Holder. The telephone number so provided must permit any person to 
make a do-not-call request during regular business hours. Whenever 
possible, CPN is the preferred number and should be transmitted.
    (B) Any OTP Firm or OTP Holder that engages in telemarketing, as 
defined in Section 9.20(b)(10)(B) of this rule, is prohibited from 
blocking the transmission of caller identification information.
    (C) Provision of caller identification information does not obviate 
the requirement for a caller to verbally supply identification 
information during a call.
    (10) Definitions.
    (A) For purposes of Section 9.20, an OTP Firm or OTP Holder has an 
``established business relationship'' with a person if:
    (i) The person has made a financial transaction or has a security 
position, a money balance, or account activity with the OTP Firm or OTP 
Holder or at a clearing firm that provides clearing services to such 
OTP Firm or OTP Holder within the previous 18 months immediately 
preceding the date of the telemarketing call;
    (ii) The OTP Firm or OTP Holder is the broker-dealer of record for 
an account of the person within the previous 18 months immediately 
preceding the date of the telemarketing call; or
    (iii) The person has contacted the OTP Firm or OTP Holder to 
inquire about a product service offered by the OTP Firm or OTP Holder 
within the previous three months immediately preceding the date of the 
telemarketing call, which relationship has not been previously 
terminated by either party.
    A person's established business relationship with an OTP Firm or 
OTP Holder does not extend to the OTP Firm's or OTP Holder's affiliated 
entities unless the person would reasonably expect them to be included, 
given the nature and type of products or services offered by the 
affiliate and the identity of the affiliate. Similarly, a person's 
established business relationship with an OTP Firm's or Holder's 
affiliate does not extend to the OTP Firm or OTP Holder unless the 
person would reasonably expect the OTP Firm or OTP Holder to be 
included. A person's request to be placed on an OTP Firm's or OTP 
Holder's firm-specific do-not-call list as set forth in Section 
9.20(b)(1)(B) of this rule terminates an established business 
relationship for purposes of telemarketing and telephone solicitation, 
even if the person continues to do business with the OTP Holder or OTP 
Firm.
    (B) The terms ``telemarketing'' and ``telephone solicitation'' mean 
the initiation of a telephone call or message for the purpose of 
encouraging the purchase or rental of, or investment in, property, 
goods, or services, which is transmitted to any person.
    (C) The term ``personal relationship'' means any family member, 
friend or acquaintance of the telemarketer making the call.
    (D) The term ``account activity'' shall include, but not be limited 
to, purchases, sales, interest credits or debits, charges or credits, 
dividend payments, transfer activity, securities receipts or 
deliveries, and/or journal entries relating to securities or funds in 
the possession or control of the OTP Firm or OTP Holder.
    (E) The term ``broker-dealer of record'' refers to the broker-
dealer identified on a customer's account application for accounts held 
directly at a mutual fund or variable insurance product issuer.
    (F) The terms ``automatic telephone dialing system'' and 
``autodialer'' mean equipment which has the capacity to store or 
produce telephone numbers to be called using a random or sequential 
number generator and to dial such numbers.
    (G) The term ``telephone facsimile machine'' means equipment which 
has the capacity to transcribe text or images (or both) from paper, 
into an electronic signal and to transmit that signal over a regular 
telephone line, or to transcribe text or images (or both) from an 
electronic signal received over a regular telephone line onto paper.
    (H) The term ``unsolicited advertisement'' means any material 
advertising the commercial availability or quality of any products or 
services which is transmitted to any person without that person's prior 
express invitation or permission.
    Rule 9.20(c)-(d)--No Change.
* * * * *

[[Page 38956]]

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections (A), (B) and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of 
such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this Amendment No. 2 is to make the proposed rule 
consistent with NYSE Rule 404A by including provisions concerning 
general telemarketing requirements, procedures, wireless 
communications, outsourcing telemarketing, pre-recorded messages, 
telephone facsimile or computer advertisements and caller 
identification. This Amendment No. 2 replaces the original filing in 
its entirety. In 2003, the FTC, via its Telemarketing Sales Rule, and 
the Federal Communications Commission (``FCC''), via its Miscellaneous 
Rules Relating to Common Carriers, established requirements for sellers 
and telemarketers to participate in a national do-not-call registry.\6\ 
Since June 2003, consumers have been able to enter their home telephone 
numbers into the national do-not-call registry, which is maintained by 
the FTC. Under rules of the FTC and FCC, sellers and telemarketers 
generally are prohibited from making telephone solicitations to 
consumers whose numbers are listed in the national do-not-call 
registry. The FCC's do-not-call rules apply to broker-dealers while the 
FTC's rules do not.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The do-not-call rules of the FCC and FTC are very similar in 
terms of substance, in part, because Congress directed the FCC to 
consult with the FTC to maximize consistency between their 
respective do-not-call rules. See The Do-Not-Call Implementation 
Act, 108 Public Law 10, 117 Stat. 557 (March 11, 2003).
    \7\ See 15 U.S.C. 6102(d)(2)(A), which provides that ``The Rules 
promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission under subsection (a) 
shall not apply to * * * [among other persons, brokers or dealers]. 
* * *'' The FTC's rules were not promulgated under 15 U.S.C. 6102. 
The FCC's rules are not subject to this limitation and apply to all 
sellers and telemarketers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In February 2005, the SEC requested that NYSE Arca adopt the 
proposed telemarketing rules to require OTP Holders and OTP Firms to 
participate in the do-not-call registry.\8\ Because broker-dealers are 
subject to the FCC's do-not-call rules, NYSE Arca modeled its rules in 
this area after those of the FCC and codified these do-not-call 
requirements in NYSE Arca Rule 9.20(b), with minor modifications 
tailoring the rules to broker-dealer activities and the securities 
industry. Current NYSE Arca Rule 9.20(b) will be deleted and replaced 
in its entirety with proposed Rule 9.20(b) set forth in Exhibit 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention 
Act of 1994 (codified at 15 U.S.C. 6102) requires the SEC to 
promulgate telemarketing rules substantially similar to those of the 
FTC or to direct self-regulatory organizations to promulgate such 
rules unless the SEC determines that such rules are not in the 
interest of investor protection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Safe Harbor Provision for the National Do-Not-Call Registry 
Requirements

    The FCC and FTC each provided persons subject to their respective 
do-not-call rules a ``safe harbor'' providing that a seller or 
telemarketer is not liable for a violation of the do-not-call rules 
that is the result of an error if the seller or telemarketer's routine 
business practice meets certain standards. The Exchange has provided a 
parallel safe harbor in paragraph (3) of proposed NYSE Arca Rule 
9.20(b); the safe harbor is limited the requirements of paragraph 
(1)(C) of proposed NYSE Arca Rule 9.20(b), which prohibits an OTP Firm, 
OTP Holder or associated person from initiating any telephone 
solicitation to any person who has registered his or her phone number 
with the national do-not-call registry.
    To be eligible for this proposed NYSE Arca Rule 9.20(b) safe 
harbor, an OTP Holder or OTP Firm must demonstrate that the OTP 
Holder's or OTP Firm's routine business practice meets four standards 
in proposed Rule 9.20(b). First, the OTP Holder or OTP Firm must have 
established and implemented written procedures to comply with the 
national do-not-call rules. Second, the OTP Holder or OTP Firm must 
have trained its personnel, and any entity assisting it in its 
compliance, in procedures established pursuant to the national do-not-
call rules. Third, the OTP Holder or OTP Firm must have maintained and 
recorded a list of telephone numbers that the OTP Holder or OTP Firm 
may not contact. Fourth, the OTP Holder or OTP Firm must use a process 
to prevent telephone solicitations to any telephone number on any list 
established pursuant to the do-not-call rules, employing a version of 
the national do-not-call registry obtained from the FTC no more than 
thirty-one (31) days prior to the date any call is made, and must 
maintain records documenting this process.

Other Provisions

    This Amendment No. 2 includes additional provisions concerning 
general telemarketing requirements, procedures, wireless 
communications, outsourcing telemarketing, pre-recorded messages, 
telephone facsimile or computer advertisements and caller 
identification. Proposed Section 9.20(b)(1) outlines the General 
Telemarketing Requirements specifying when OTP Holders, OTP Firms and 
associated persons may not contact residences and certain persons. 
Proposed Section 9.20(b)(2) provides an exception for calling a person 
on the national do-not-call registry if the OTP Holder or OTP Firm has 
the person's permission to make calls, or if the OTP Holder or OTP Firm 
has an established business relationship with the person. Proposed 
Section 9.20(b)(4) sets forth the procedures that OTP Firms or OTP 
Holders must institute to comply with the General Telemarketing 
Requirements set forth in Section 9.20(b)(1). Proposed Section 
9.20(b)(5) sets forth when OTP Firms and OTP Holders are prohibited 
from using wireless communications. Proposed Section 9.20(b)(6) sets 
forth the requirement that OTP Firms and OTP Holders outsourcing 
telemarketing remain responsible for compliance with Section 9.20(b). 
Proposed Section 9.20(b)(7) sets forth the requirements that OTP Firms 
and OTP Holders must satisfy to utilize pre-recorded messages. Proposed 
Section 9.20(b)(8) prohibits OTP Firms, OTP Holders or associated 
person from using a telephone facsimile machine, computer or other 
device to send unsolicited advertisements to a telephone facsimile 
machine, computer or other device. Finally, proposed Section 9.20(b)(9) 
sets forth the requirement that OTP Firms and OTP Holders engaging in 
telemarketing must transmit caller identification information.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with section 6(b) of the Exchange Act \9\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of section 6(b)(5) \10\ in particular, because it is 
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to 
protect investors and the public interest. The

[[Page 38957]]

Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will increase the 
protection of investors by enabling investors who do not want to 
receive telephone solicitations from OTP Firms or OTP Holders to 
receive the benefits and protections of the national do-not-call 
registry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited 
nor received by the Exchange.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve such rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change, as amended, is consistent with the Exchange Act. Comments may 
be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov.
     Please include File Number SR-PCX-2005-54 on the subject 
line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PCX-2005-54. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and 
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Section, Station Place, 
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Copies of such filing 
also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal 
office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without 
change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information 
from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to 
make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number 
SR-PCX-2005-54 and should be submitted on or before July 31, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-10681 Filed 7-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P