Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from the Philippines: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 38620-38621 [E6-10665]

Download as PDF 38620 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 130 / Friday, July 7, 2006 / Notices preliminary results. An interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of these preliminary results. See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Interested parties may submit written comments (case briefs) within 30 days of publication of the preliminary results and rebuttal comments (rebuttal briefs), which must be limited to issues raised in the case briefs, within five days after the time limit for filing case briefs. See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and 19 CFR 351.309(d). Parties who submit arguments are requested to submit with the argument: (1) a statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities. Further, the Department requests that parties submitting written comments provide the Department with a diskette containing the public version of those comments. Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department will issue the final results of this new shipper review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised by the parties in their comments, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results. The assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by this review and future deposits of estimated duties shall be based on the final results of this review. cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Assessment Rates Upon issuing the final results of the review, the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess and liquidate, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. The Department will issue appropriate appraisement instructions for the companies subject to this review directly to CBP within 15 days of publication of the final results of this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we will calculate importer–specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of the dumping margins calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review if any importer–specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis. CXF and exported by Eastwing that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this new shipper review. See 19 CFR 351.214(e). The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this new shipper review for all shipments of subject merchandise from Eastwing entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date: (1) for subject merchandise manufactured by CXF and exported by Eastwing, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the final results of this review, except that no cash deposit will be required if the cash deposit rate calculated in the final results is zero or de minimis; and (2) for subject merchandise exported by Eastwing but not manufactured by CXF, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the PRC–wide rate (i.e., 198.63 percent); and (3) for subject merchandise produced by CXF but not exported by Eastwing, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the exporter. These requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until publication of the final results of the next administrative review. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. This new shipper review and notice are in accordance with sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B), and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(h)(i). Dated: June 27, 2006. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6–10667 Filed 7–6–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S Cash Deposit Requirements Upon completion of this review, we will require cash deposits at the rate established in the final results as further described below. Bonding will no longer be permitted to fulfill security requirements for shipments of certain preserved mushrooms from the PRC produced by VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:46 Jul 06, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–565–801] Stainless Steel Butt–Weld Pipe Fittings from the Philippines: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: July 7, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Baker or Robert James, AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482 2924 or (202) 482– 0649, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On February 1, 2006, the Department published in the Federal Register (71 FR 5239) a notice of ‘‘Opportunity to Request an Administrative Review’’ of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel butt–weld pipe fittings from the Philippines for the period February 1, 2005, through January 31, 2006. On February 28, 2006, petitioners (Flowline Division of Markovitz Enterprises, Inc., Gerlin, Inc., Shaw Alloy Piping Products, Inc., and Taylor Forge Stainless, Inc.) requested an administrative review of Tung Fong Industrial Co., Inc. (Tung Fong) and Enlin Steel Corporation (Enlin) for this period. On April 5, 2006, the Department published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel butt–weld pipe fittings from the Philippines with respect to these two companies. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Deferral of Administrative Reviews, 71 FR 17077 (April 5, 2006). Rescission of Review On June 19, 2006, petitioners withdrew their request for an administrative review of Tung Fong’s and Enlin’s sales during the above– referenced period. Section 351.213(d)(1) of the Department’s regulations stipulates that the Secretary will rescind an administrative review if the party that requests a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of publication of notice of initiation of the requested review. In this case, petitioners have withdrawn their E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM 07JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 130 / Friday, July 7, 2006 / Notices request for review within the 90–day period. Petitioners were the sole party to request this review. Therefore, we are rescinding this review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel butt–weld pipe fittings from the Philippines. This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: June 30, 2006. Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6–10665 Filed 7–6–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–890] Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Final Changed Circumstances Review, and Determination To Revoke Order in Part Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: July 7, 2006. SUMMARY: On May 9, 2006, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published a notice of initiation and preliminary results of a changed circumstances antidumping duty review with intent to revoke, in part, the antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) order on wooden bedroom furniture from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review, and Intent to Revoke Order in Part, 71 FR 26928 (May 9, 2006) (‘‘Initiation and Preliminary Results’’). We are now revoking this order in part, with regard to the following product: Jewelry armoires that have at least one side door, whether or not the door is lined with felt or felt-like material, as described in the ‘‘Scope’’ section of this notice, based on the fact that domestic parties have expressed no further interest in the relief provided by the order with respect to the imports of these jewelry armoires, as so described. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Will Dickerson or Robert Bolling, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–1778 and (202) 482–3434, respectively. cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:46 Jul 06, 2006 Jkt 208001 Background On February 2, 2006, and in an amendment on March 16, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) received a request on behalf of the petitioners, the American Furniture Manufacturers Committee for Legal Trade and its individual members (the ‘‘AFMC’’) for revocation in part of the AD order on wooden bedroom furniture from the PRC pursuant to sections 751(b)(1) and 782(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), with respect to jewelry armoires that have at least one side door, whether or not lined with felt or felt-like material. In its February 2, 2006, submission, AFMC stated that it no longer has any interest in antidumping relief from imports of such jewelry armoires. On May 17, 2006, L. Powell Company (‘‘Powell’’) submitted comments on our preliminary results of the changed circumstances review. Powell stated that it supports the Department’s preliminary ruling that jewelry armoires that have at least one side door, whether or not the door is lined with felt or feltlike material are excluded from the wooden bedroom furniture order. Also, Powell requested that the Department rule on an expedited basis that the above-mentioned merchandise is excluded from the order. Scope of Changed Circumstances Review The merchandise covered by this changed circumstances review is jewelry armoires that have at least one side door, whether or not lined with felt or felt-like material from the PRC. This changed circumstances administrative review covers jewelry armoires from the PRC meeting the specifications as described above. Effective upon publication of this final results of changed circumstances review in the Federal Register, the amended scope of the order will read as follows. Scope of the Order The product covered is wooden bedroom furniture. Wooden bedroom furniture is generally, but not exclusively, designed, manufactured, and offered for sale in coordinated groups, or bedrooms, in which all of the individual pieces are of approximately the same style and approximately the same material and/or finish. The subject merchandise is made substantially of wood products, including both solid wood and also engineered wood products made from wood particles, fibers, or other wooden materials such as plywood, oriented strand board, PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 38621 particle board, and fiberboard, with or without wood veneers, wood overlays, or laminates, with or without non-wood components or trim such as metal, marble, leather, glass, plastic, or other resins, and whether or not assembled, completed, or finished. The subject merchandise includes the following items: (1) Wooden beds such as loft beds, bunk beds, and other beds; (2) wooden headboards for beds (whether stand-alone or attached to side rails), wooden footboards for beds, wooden side rails for beds, and wooden canopies for beds; (3) night tables, night stands, dressers, commodes, bureaus, mule chests, gentlemen’s chests, bachelor’s chests, lingerie chests, wardrobes, vanities, chessers, chifforobes, and wardrobe-type cabinets; (4) dressers with framed glass mirrors that are attached to, incorporated in, sit on, or hang over the dresser; (5) chestson-chests,1 highboys,2 lowboys,3 chests of drawers,4 chests,5 door chests,6 chiffoniers,7 hutches,8 and armoires; 9 (6) desks, computer stands, filing cabinets, book cases, or writing tables that are attached to or incorporated in the subject merchandise; and (7) other bedroom furniture consistent with the above list. The scope of the order excludes the following items: (1) Seats, chairs, benches, couches, sofas, sofa beds, stools, and other seating furniture; (2) mattresses, mattress supports (including 1 A chest-on-chest is typically a tall chest-ofdrawers in two or more sections (or appearing to be in two or more sections), with one or two sections mounted (or appearing to be mounted) on a slightly larger chest; also known as a tallboy. 2 A highboy is typically a tall chest of drawers usually composed of a base and a top section with drawers, and supported on four legs or a small chest (often 15 inches or more in height). 3 A lowboy is typically a short chest of drawers, not more than four feet high, normally set on short legs. 4 A chest of drawers is typically a case containing drawers for storing clothing. 5 A chest is typically a case piece taller than it is wide featuring a series of drawers and with or without one or more doors for storing clothing. The piece can either include drawers or be designed as a large box incorporating a lid. 6 A door chest is typically a chest with hinged doors to store clothing, whether or not containing drawers. The piece may also include shelves for televisions and other entertainment electronics. 7 A chiffonier is typically a tall and narrow chest of drawers normally used for storing undergarments and lingerie, often with mirror(s) attached. 8 A hutch is typically an open case of furniture with shelves that typically sits on another piece of furniture and provides storage for clothes. 9 An armoire is typically a tall cabinet or wardrobe (typically 50 inches or taller), with doors, and with one or more drawers (either exterior below or above the doors or interior behind the doors), shelves, and/or garment rods or other apparatus for storing clothes. Bedroom armoires may also be used to hold television receivers and/or other audiovisual entertainment systems. E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM 07JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 130 (Friday, July 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38620-38621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10665]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-565-801]


Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from the Philippines: 
Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 7, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Baker or Robert James, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482 
2924 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On February 1, 2006, the Department published in the Federal 
Register (71 FR 5239) a notice of ``Opportunity to Request an 
Administrative Review'' of the antidumping duty order on stainless 
steel butt-weld pipe fittings from the Philippines for the period 
February 1, 2005, through January 31, 2006. On February 28, 2006, 
petitioners (Flowline Division of Markovitz Enterprises, Inc., Gerlin, 
Inc., Shaw Alloy Piping Products, Inc., and Taylor Forge Stainless, 
Inc.) requested an administrative review of Tung Fong Industrial Co., 
Inc. (Tung Fong) and Enlin Steel Corporation (Enlin) for this period. 
On April 5, 2006, the Department published a notice of initiation of an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel 
butt-weld pipe fittings from the Philippines with respect to these two 
companies. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews and Deferral of Administrative Reviews, 71 FR 
17077 (April 5, 2006).

Rescission of Review

    On June 19, 2006, petitioners withdrew their request for an 
administrative review of Tung Fong's and Enlin's sales during the 
above-referenced period. Section 351.213(d)(1) of the Department's 
regulations stipulates that the Secretary will rescind an 
administrative review if the party that requests a review withdraws the 
request within 90 days of the date of publication of notice of 
initiation of the requested review. In this case, petitioners have 
withdrawn their

[[Page 38621]]

request for review within the 90-day period. Petitioners were the sole 
party to request this review. Therefore, we are rescinding this review 
of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel butt-weld pipe 
fittings from the Philippines.
    This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).

    Dated: June 30, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-10665 Filed 7-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.