Upward Bound Program, 37926-37928 [E6-10398]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
37926
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
(iii) The extent to which the results of
the proposed project will be
disseminated in a manner that will
enable others to use the information or
strategies (20 points).
(iv) The qualifications, including
relevant training and experience, of the
project director and the extent to which
the applicant encourages applications
for employment from persons who are
members of groups that traditionally
have been underrepresented based on
race, color, national origin, gender, age,
or disability (10 points).
(v) The adequacy of the management
plan to achieve the objectives of the
proposed project on time and within
budget, including clearly defined
responsibilities, timelines, and
milestones for accomplishing project
tasks (20 points).
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we will notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN). We may also notify you
informally.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: At the end of your
project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial
information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multi-year
award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the
most current performance and financial
expenditure information as specified by
the Secretary in 34 CFR 75.118. For
specific requirements on grantee
reporting, please go to the ED
Performance Report Form 524B at
https://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/
appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: The goal of
the CSP is to support the creation and
development of a large number of highquality charter schools that are free from
State or local rules that inhibit flexible
operation, are held accountable for
enabling students to reach challenging
State performance standards, and are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Jun 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
open to all students. The Secretary has
set three performance indicators to
measure this goal: (1) The number of
States, including the District of
Columbia and Puerto Rico, with charter
school laws, (2) the number of charter
schools in operation around the Nation,
and (3) the percentage of charter school
students who are achieving at or above
the proficient level on State
examinations in mathematics and
reading. Additionally, the Secretary has
established the following measure to
examine the efficiency of the CSP:
Federal cost per student in
implementing a successful school
(defined as a school in operation for
three or more years).
All grantees will be expected to
submit an annual performance report
documenting their contribution in
assisting the Department in meeting
these performance measures.
VII. Agency Contact
Erin
Pfeltz, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Room
4W255, Washington, DC 20202–5970.
Telephone: (202) 205–3525 or by e-mail:
erin.pfeltz@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the program contact person
listed in this section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VIII. Other Information
Electronic Access to This Document:
You may view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: June 28, 2006.
Christopher J. Doherty,
Acting Assistant Deputy Secretary Office of
Innovation and Improvement.
[FR Doc. E6–10396 Filed 6–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Upward Bound Program
Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priority.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for
Postsecondary Education proposes to
establish a priority under the Upward
Bound Program. We are proposing to
establish this priority to focus Federal
resources on students most in need of
academic assistance and to increase the
effectiveness of the Upward Bound
Program. We propose this priority to
increase the number of low-income, first
generation students with the ‘‘greatest
academic need’’ for program services
that participate in the Upward Bound
program, and to provide all Upward
Bound participants an opportunity to
receive services for four years.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before August 2, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about
this proposed priority to Geraldine
Smith, U.S. Department of Education,
1990 K Street, NW., room 7020,
Washington, DC 20006–8512. If you
prefer to send your comments through
the Internet, use the following address:
TRIO@ed.gov.
You must include the term ‘‘Upward
Bound Comments’’ in the subject line of
your electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gaby Watts. Telephone: (202) 502–7545
or via Internet: gaby.watts@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation To Comment
We invite you to submit comments
regarding this proposed priority.
We invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866
and its overall requirement of reducing
E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM
03JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Notices
regulatory burden that might result from
this proposed priority. Please let us
know of any further opportunities we
should take to reduce potential costs or
increase potential benefits while
preserving the effective and efficient
administration of the program.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about this proposed priority in room
7020, 1990 K Street, NW., Washington,
DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and
4 p.m., Eastern time, Monday through
Friday of each week except Federal
holidays.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Assistance to Individuals With
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record
On request, we will supply an
appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for this proposed priority. If you
want to schedule an appointment for
this type of aid, please contact the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Background
The Upward Bound Program is one of
eight programs known as the Federal
TRIO Programs. Under the Upward
Bound Program, the Department
provides discretionary grants to
institutions of higher education, public
and private agencies and organizations,
and combinations of institutions,
agencies and organizations. The Upward
Bound Program supports projects that
are designed to generate, in eligible
students, the skills and motivation
necessary for success in education
beyond secondary school. Projects
under the Upward Bound Program
provide, among other services,
instruction in reading, writing,
mathematics, science, study skills, and
other subjects necessary for success in
education beyond high school.
An assessment of the Upward Bound
Program using the Office of
Management and Budget’s Program
Assessment Rating Tool resulted in an
‘‘Ineffective’’ rating because the program
has not been able to demonstrate
positive overall results. In 1991,
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.,
under contract to the Department of
Education, initiated an ongoing
evaluation of Upward Bound, based on
a random assignment design. A 2004
report titled, The Impacts of Regular
Upward Bound: Results from the Third
Follow-Up Data Collection (‘‘The
Study’’), found that the overall impact of
Upward Bound programs on the high
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Jun 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
school and early college outcomes of
participants was not significantly
different from those of a control group.
However, the Study did indicate that
Upward Bound has a statistically
significant positive impact on students
with lower educational expectations.
For students with lower educational
expectations, i.e., students who did not
expect to complete a bachelor’s degree
when they applied to Upward Bound,
participation in the program more than
doubles the likelihood those students
attend a four-year college or university,
raising the enrollment rate from 18
percent to 38 percent. For this group of
students, participation in Upward
Bound also improves high school
preparation for postsecondary
education, increasing the total number
of academic credits earned in high
school and the number of Advanced
Placement credits earned. It also
increases early college persistence. The
Study may be reviewed at: https://
www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/highered/
upward/upward-3rd-report.html.
It is difficult, however, to screen
applicants based on their educational
expectations. There is no reliable way of
objectively determining a person’s
expectation. If it became common
knowledge that students with lower
expectations were more likely to be
admitted than were students with
higher expectations, applicants would
have a strong incentive to understate
their educational expectations in the
application process. We do know that
low educational expectations are more
prevalent among students with high
academic risk for failure. Therefore, we
propose this priority to target the
program to students with a high
academic risk for failure.
Under this proposed priority,
otherwise eligible students deemed to
have ‘‘high academic risk for failure’’
would be those who—
1. Have not achieved at the proficient
level on State assessments in reading/
language arts for grade eight;
2. Have not achieved at the proficient
level on State assessments in math for
grade eight; or
3. Have a grade point average of 2.5
or less (on a 4.0 scale) for the most
recent school year for which grade point
averages are available.
These criteria are consistent with the
overall purpose and goals of the Upward
Bound Program. Section 402C(a) of the
HEA requires Upward Bound projects to
be designed to generate skills and
motivation necessary for success in
education beyond secondary school.
The Department’s regulations for the
Upward Bound Program in 34 CFR
645.3 implement this statutory goal in
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37927
the eligibility requirements for
participating in an Upward Bound
project. Those requirements specify,
among other things, that a student must
have a need for academic support, as
determined by the grantee, in order to
pursue successfully a program of
education beyond high school.
Commonly used criteria for determining
a student’s ‘‘need for academic support’’
are the student’s GPA and performance
on standardized tests.
In addition, by using State academic
achievement assessments to determine
student eligibility for services, Upward
Bound projects will be able to align
their programs with the requirements
and activities supported by the No Child
Left Behind Act of 2001.
The Study also revealed that, among
Upward Bound participants, 35 percent
participate for 1 to 12 months, 28
percent participate for 13 to 24 months
and 36 percent participate for 25 or
more months. The Study found that 40
percent complete the program, that is,
participate in Upward Bound through
high school graduation. Students who
applied for Upward Bound in the
summer after completing eighth grade
typically spent more time in Upward
Bound than other participants (42
months). The Study concluded that, for
students who participated in Upward
Bound for less than two years, an
additional year of Upward Bound
participation could raise the
postsecondary enrollment rate by as
much as nine percentage points. For
Upward Bound participants who did
not complete the program, the Study
found that program completion could
raise postsecondary enrollment by as
much as 17 percentage points.
Therefore, we are proposing in this
priority to give students an opportunity
to receive a minimum of three years,
and potentially four years of Upward
Bound services by targeting projects that
propose to select all first-time
participants from among otherwise
eligible students who have completed
the 8th grade, but not the 9th grade, in
secondary school.
To evaluate the outcomes of projects
funded under this priority, the
Department plans to conduct a rigorous
evaluation of the impacts of the Upward
Bound Program. Under 34 CFR 75.591,
grantees must cooperate in the
evaluation. As specified in the proposed
priority, any regular Upward Bound
grantee may be selected to participate in
the evaluation. Each selected grantee
would be required to recruit at least
twice as many eligible new students in
project year 2007–2008 as the grantee
plans to serve in its project. Of that
larger pool of eligible new students at
E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM
03JYN1
37928
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Notices
least 30 percent must meet the
definition of ‘‘high academic risk for
failure.’’ Grantees selected to participate
in the evaluation would be required to
refrain from admitting new students
into their Upward Bound projects for
project year 2007–2008 until the
evaluator has completed its data
collection and random assignment for
those students. Eligible new students
will be assigned randomly by the
evaluator either to participate in
Upward Bound or to serve as part of a
control group (not in Upward Bound).
We will announce the final priority in
a notice in the Federal Register. We will
determine the final priority after
considering responses to this notice and
other information available to the
Department. This notice does not
preclude us from proposing or funding
additional priorities, subject to meeting
applicable requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use this proposed priority, we will invite
applications through a notice in the Federal
Register.
Priority
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Proposed Absolute Priority: Upward
Bound Program Participant Selection
This priority supports Upward Bound
Program projects that select first-time
participants from otherwise eligible
students who have completed the 8th
grade but not the 9th grade in secondary
school, and that select not less than 30
percent of all first-time participants
from students who have ‘‘high academic
risk for failure.’’
Otherwise eligible students deemed to
have ‘‘high academic risk for failure’’
are those who—
1. Have not achieved at the proficient
level on State assessments in reading/
language arts for grade eight;
2. Have not achieved at the proficient
level on State assessments in math for
grade eight; or
3. Have a grade point average of 2.5
or less (on a 4.0 scale) for the most
recent school year for which grade point
averages are available.
To meet this priority, an applicant
also must agree to conduct its Upward
Bound project in a manner consistent
with the evaluation that the Department
plans to conduct for the Upward Bound
Program. An applicant also must agree,
if selected to participate in the
evaluation, to—
1. Recruit at least twice as many
eligible new students in project year
2007–2008 as the grantee plans to serve
in its project. Of that larger pool of
eligible new students at least 30 percent
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Jun 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
must meet the definition of ‘‘high
academic risk for failure;’’
2. Refrain from admitting new
students into its Upward Bound project
for project year 2007–2008 until the
evaluator has completed its data
collection and random assignment for
those students; and
3. Agree that eligible new students
will be assigned randomly by the
evaluator either to participate in
Upward Bound or to serve as part of a
control group (not in Upward Bound).
This proposed absolute priority does
not apply to the Veterans Upward
Bound projects and Upward Bound
Math/Science projects.
Executive Order 12866
This notice of proposed priority has
been reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866. Under the terms
of the order, we have assessed the
potential costs and benefits of this
regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with
the notice of proposed priority are those
resulting from statutory requirements
and those we have determined are
necessary for administering this
program effectively and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this notice of proposed
priority, we have determined that the
benefits of the proposed priority justify
the costs.
We have also determined that this
action does not unduly interfere with
State, local, and tribal governments in
the exercise of their governmental
functions.
Intergovernmental Review
This Program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the
Executive order is to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism. The Executive
order relies on processes developed by
State and local governments for
coordination and review of proposed
Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early
notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Applicable Program Regulations: 34
CFR part 645.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well
as all other documents of this
Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF) on the Internet
at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/
news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 84.047A Upward Bound Program)
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a–13.
Dated: June 28, 2006.
James F. Manning,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary
Education.
[FR Doc. E6–10398 Filed 6–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Arbitration Panel Decision Under the
Randolph-Sheppard Act
Department of Education.
Notice of arbitration panel
decision under the Randolph-Sheppard
Act.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department gives notice
that on November 1, 2005, an arbitration
panel rendered a decision in the matter
of Billie Ruth Schlank v. District of
Columbia Department of Human
Services, Rehabilitation Services
Administration (Docket No. R–S/04–6).
This panel was convened by the U.S.
Department of Education, under 20
U.S.C. 107d–1(a), after the Department
received a complaint filed by the
complainant, Billie Ruth Schlank.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You
may obtain a copy of the full text of the
arbitration panel decision from Suzette
E. Haynes, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Room 5022, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202–2800.
Telephone: (202) 245–7374. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), you may call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed in
the preceding paragraph.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
section 6(c) of the Randolph-Sheppard
Act (the Act), 20 U.S.C. 107d–2(c), the
Secretary publishes in the Federal
Register a synopsis of each arbitration
panel decision affecting the
E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM
03JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 127 (Monday, July 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37926-37928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10398]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Upward Bound Program
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priority.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education proposes
to establish a priority under the Upward Bound Program. We are
proposing to establish this priority to focus Federal resources on
students most in need of academic assistance and to increase the
effectiveness of the Upward Bound Program. We propose this priority to
increase the number of low-income, first generation students with the
``greatest academic need'' for program services that participate in the
Upward Bound program, and to provide all Upward Bound participants an
opportunity to receive services for four years.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before August 2, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about this proposed priority to
Geraldine Smith, U.S. Department of Education, 1990 K Street, NW., room
7020, Washington, DC 20006-8512. If you prefer to send your comments
through the Internet, use the following address: TRIO@ed.gov.
You must include the term ``Upward Bound Comments'' in the subject
line of your electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gaby Watts. Telephone: (202) 502-7545
or via Internet: gaby.watts@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may
call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation To Comment
We invite you to submit comments regarding this proposed priority.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of
reducing
[[Page 37927]]
regulatory burden that might result from this proposed priority. Please
let us know of any further opportunities we should take to reduce
potential costs or increase potential benefits while preserving the
effective and efficient administration of the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about this proposed priority in room 7020, 1990 K Street, NW.,
Washington, DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Eastern
time, Monday through Friday of each week except Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities in Reviewing the Rulemaking
Record
On request, we will supply an appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a disability who needs
assistance to review the comments or other documents in the public
rulemaking record for this proposed priority. If you want to schedule
an appointment for this type of aid, please contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Background
The Upward Bound Program is one of eight programs known as the
Federal TRIO Programs. Under the Upward Bound Program, the Department
provides discretionary grants to institutions of higher education,
public and private agencies and organizations, and combinations of
institutions, agencies and organizations. The Upward Bound Program
supports projects that are designed to generate, in eligible students,
the skills and motivation necessary for success in education beyond
secondary school. Projects under the Upward Bound Program provide,
among other services, instruction in reading, writing, mathematics,
science, study skills, and other subjects necessary for success in
education beyond high school.
An assessment of the Upward Bound Program using the Office of
Management and Budget's Program Assessment Rating Tool resulted in an
``Ineffective'' rating because the program has not been able to
demonstrate positive overall results. In 1991, Mathematica Policy
Research, Inc., under contract to the Department of Education,
initiated an ongoing evaluation of Upward Bound, based on a random
assignment design. A 2004 report titled, The Impacts of Regular Upward
Bound: Results from the Third Follow-Up Data Collection (``The
Study''), found that the overall impact of Upward Bound programs on the
high school and early college outcomes of participants was not
significantly different from those of a control group. However, the
Study did indicate that Upward Bound has a statistically significant
positive impact on students with lower educational expectations. For
students with lower educational expectations, i.e., students who did
not expect to complete a bachelor's degree when they applied to Upward
Bound, participation in the program more than doubles the likelihood
those students attend a four-year college or university, raising the
enrollment rate from 18 percent to 38 percent. For this group of
students, participation in Upward Bound also improves high school
preparation for postsecondary education, increasing the total number of
academic credits earned in high school and the number of Advanced
Placement credits earned. It also increases early college persistence.
The Study may be reviewed at: https://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/highered/
upward/upward-3rd-report.html.
It is difficult, however, to screen applicants based on their
educational expectations. There is no reliable way of objectively
determining a person's expectation. If it became common knowledge that
students with lower expectations were more likely to be admitted than
were students with higher expectations, applicants would have a strong
incentive to understate their educational expectations in the
application process. We do know that low educational expectations are
more prevalent among students with high academic risk for failure.
Therefore, we propose this priority to target the program to students
with a high academic risk for failure.
Under this proposed priority, otherwise eligible students deemed to
have ``high academic risk for failure'' would be those who--
1. Have not achieved at the proficient level on State assessments
in reading/language arts for grade eight;
2. Have not achieved at the proficient level on State assessments
in math for grade eight; or
3. Have a grade point average of 2.5 or less (on a 4.0 scale) for
the most recent school year for which grade point averages are
available.
These criteria are consistent with the overall purpose and goals of
the Upward Bound Program. Section 402C(a) of the HEA requires Upward
Bound projects to be designed to generate skills and motivation
necessary for success in education beyond secondary school. The
Department's regulations for the Upward Bound Program in 34 CFR 645.3
implement this statutory goal in the eligibility requirements for
participating in an Upward Bound project. Those requirements specify,
among other things, that a student must have a need for academic
support, as determined by the grantee, in order to pursue successfully
a program of education beyond high school. Commonly used criteria for
determining a student's ``need for academic support'' are the student's
GPA and performance on standardized tests.
In addition, by using State academic achievement assessments to
determine student eligibility for services, Upward Bound projects will
be able to align their programs with the requirements and activities
supported by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.
The Study also revealed that, among Upward Bound participants, 35
percent participate for 1 to 12 months, 28 percent participate for 13
to 24 months and 36 percent participate for 25 or more months. The
Study found that 40 percent complete the program, that is, participate
in Upward Bound through high school graduation. Students who applied
for Upward Bound in the summer after completing eighth grade typically
spent more time in Upward Bound than other participants (42 months).
The Study concluded that, for students who participated in Upward Bound
for less than two years, an additional year of Upward Bound
participation could raise the postsecondary enrollment rate by as much
as nine percentage points. For Upward Bound participants who did not
complete the program, the Study found that program completion could
raise postsecondary enrollment by as much as 17 percentage points.
Therefore, we are proposing in this priority to give students an
opportunity to receive a minimum of three years, and potentially four
years of Upward Bound services by targeting projects that propose to
select all first-time participants from among otherwise eligible
students who have completed the 8th grade, but not the 9th grade, in
secondary school.
To evaluate the outcomes of projects funded under this priority,
the Department plans to conduct a rigorous evaluation of the impacts of
the Upward Bound Program. Under 34 CFR 75.591, grantees must cooperate
in the evaluation. As specified in the proposed priority, any regular
Upward Bound grantee may be selected to participate in the evaluation.
Each selected grantee would be required to recruit at least twice as
many eligible new students in project year 2007-2008 as the grantee
plans to serve in its project. Of that larger pool of eligible new
students at
[[Page 37928]]
least 30 percent must meet the definition of ``high academic risk for
failure.'' Grantees selected to participate in the evaluation would be
required to refrain from admitting new students into their Upward Bound
projects for project year 2007-2008 until the evaluator has completed
its data collection and random assignment for those students. Eligible
new students will be assigned randomly by the evaluator either to
participate in Upward Bound or to serve as part of a control group (not
in Upward Bound).
We will announce the final priority in a notice in the Federal
Register. We will determine the final priority after considering
responses to this notice and other information available to the
Department. This notice does not preclude us from proposing or funding
additional priorities, subject to meeting applicable requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use this proposed priority, we will invite
applications through a notice in the Federal Register.
Priority
Proposed Absolute Priority: Upward Bound Program Participant Selection
This priority supports Upward Bound Program projects that select
first-time participants from otherwise eligible students who have
completed the 8th grade but not the 9th grade in secondary school, and
that select not less than 30 percent of all first-time participants
from students who have ``high academic risk for failure.''
Otherwise eligible students deemed to have ``high academic risk for
failure'' are those who--
1. Have not achieved at the proficient level on State assessments
in reading/language arts for grade eight;
2. Have not achieved at the proficient level on State assessments
in math for grade eight; or
3. Have a grade point average of 2.5 or less (on a 4.0 scale) for
the most recent school year for which grade point averages are
available.
To meet this priority, an applicant also must agree to conduct its
Upward Bound project in a manner consistent with the evaluation that
the Department plans to conduct for the Upward Bound Program. An
applicant also must agree, if selected to participate in the
evaluation, to--
1. Recruit at least twice as many eligible new students in project
year 2007-2008 as the grantee plans to serve in its project. Of that
larger pool of eligible new students at least 30 percent must meet the
definition of ``high academic risk for failure;''
2. Refrain from admitting new students into its Upward Bound
project for project year 2007-2008 until the evaluator has completed
its data collection and random assignment for those students; and
3. Agree that eligible new students will be assigned randomly by
the evaluator either to participate in Upward Bound or to serve as part
of a control group (not in Upward Bound).
This proposed absolute priority does not apply to the Veterans
Upward Bound projects and Upward Bound Math/Science projects.
Executive Order 12866
This notice of proposed priority has been reviewed in accordance
with Executive Order 12866. Under the terms of the order, we have
assessed the potential costs and benefits of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with the notice of proposed priority
are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have
determined are necessary for administering this program effectively and
efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this notice of proposed priority, we have
determined that the benefits of the proposed priority justify the
costs.
We have also determined that this action does not unduly interfere
with State, local, and tribal governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
Intergovernmental Review
This Program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive
order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened
federalism. The Executive order relies on processes developed by State
and local governments for coordination and review of proposed Federal
financial assistance.
This document provides early notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Applicable Program Regulations: 34 CFR part 645.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well as all other documents of this
Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site: https://
www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in
the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
nara/.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 84.047A Upward Bound
Program)
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-13.
Dated: June 28, 2006.
James F. Manning,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. E6-10398 Filed 6-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
