Notice of Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Stainless Steel Bar from India, 37905-37906 [E6-10386]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Notices
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0405 or (202) 482–
8029, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 25, 2006, the Department
initiated new shipper reviews of honey
from the People’s Republic of China in
accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act). See Honey from the People’s
Republic of China: Initiation of New
Shipper Antidumping Duty Review, 71
FR 5051 (January 31, 2006). The reviews
were initiated based on timely requests
received from Inner Mongolia Altin
Bee–Keeping Co., Ltd., Dongtai Peak
Honey Industry Co., Ltd., Qinhuangdao
Municipal Dafeng Industrial Co., Ltd.,
and Tianjin Eulia Honey Co. Ltd, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(c). The
preliminary results are currently due no
later than July 24, 2006.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act
requires the Department to issue the
preliminary results of a new shipper
review within 180 days after the date on
which the new shipper review was
initiated. The Department may,
however, extend the deadline for
completion of the preliminary results of
a new shipper review to 300 days if it
determines that the case is
extraordinarily complicated. See section
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.214(i)(2).
The Department has determined that
it is not practicable to complete this
review within the current time limit due
to complex issues in the case and the
late verification schedule. Accordingly,
the Department is extending the time
limit for the completion of the
preliminary results until November 21,
2006, which is the first business day 300
days from the date on which this new
shipper review was initiated, in
accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2). The
final results, in turn, will be due 90 days
after the date of issuance of the
preliminary results, unless extended.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 21, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–10376 Filed 6–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Jun 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–533–810)
Notice of Final Results and Final
Partial Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review: Stainless
Steel Bar from India
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 7, 2006, the
Department of Commerce published the
preliminary results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on stainless steel bar from India. The
period of review is February 1, 2004,
through January 31, 2005. This review
covers sales of stainless steel bar from
India with respect to Chandan Steel,
Ltd. We provided interested parties with
an opportunity to comment on the
preliminary results of this review, but
received no comments. The final results
do not differ from the preliminary
results of this review. We will instruct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to
assess antidumping duties on the
subject merchandise exported by this
company.
AGENCY:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
July 3, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Holland, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 1, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–1279.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Since the publication of the
preliminary results of this review (see
Stainless Steel Bar from India: Notice of
Preliminary Results and Preliminary
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 71 FR 11390
(March 7, 2006) (‘‘Preliminary
Results’’)), the following events have
occurred: the Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) invited interested
parties to comment on the preliminary
results of this review. No comments
were received.
Scope of the Order
Merchandise covered by the order is
shipments of stainless steel bar (‘‘SSB’’).
SSB means articles of stainless steel in
straight lengths that have been either
hot–rolled, forged, turned, cold–drawn,
cold–rolled or otherwise cold–finished,
or ground, having a uniform solid cross
section along their whole length in the
shape of circles, segments of circles,
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37905
ovals, rectangles (including squares),
triangles, hexagons, octagons, or other
convex polygons. SSB includes cold–
finished SSBs that are turned or ground
in straight lengths, whether produced
from hot–rolled bar or from straightened
and cut rod or wire, and reinforcing bars
that have indentations, ribs, grooves, or
other deformations produced during the
rolling process.
Except as specified above, the term
does not include stainless steel semi–
finished products, cut–to-length flat–
rolled products (i.e., cut–to-length
rolled products which if less than 4.75
mm in thickness have a width
measuring at least 10 times the
thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in
thickness having a width which exceeds
150 mm and measures at least twice the
thickness), wire (i.e., cold–formed
products in coils, of any uniform solid
cross section along their whole length,
which do not conform to the definition
of flat–rolled products), and angles,
shapes, and sections.
The SSB subject to these reviews is
currently classifiable under subheadings
7222.11.00.05, 7222.11.00.50,
7222.19.00.05, 7222.19.00.50,
7222.20.00.05, 7222.20.00.45,
7222.20.00.75, and 7222.30.00.00 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, our
written description of the scope of the
order is dispositive.
On May 23, 2005, the Department
issued a final scope ruling that SSB
manufactured in the United Arab
Emirates out of stainless steel wire rod
from India is not subject to the scope of
this proceeding. See Memorandum to
Barbara E. Tillman, Antidumping Duty
Orders on Stainless Steel Bar from India
and Stainless Steel Wire Rod from India:
Final Scope Ruling (May 23, 2005). The
ruling is on file in the Central Records
Unit, Room B–099 of the main
Department building (‘‘CRU’’).
Period of Review
The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is
February 1, 2004, through January 31,
2005.
Partial Rescission of Review
According to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3),
the Department will rescind an
administrative review in whole or only
with respect to a particular exporter or
producer, if we conclude that, during
the POR, there were no entries, exports,
or sales of the subject merchandise, as
the case may be. In the Preliminary
Results, the Department preliminarily
found that Ferro Alloys Corporation,
Ltd. (‘‘Facor’’) reported no entries of
E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM
03JYN1
37906
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Notices
subject merchandise to the United
States during the POR, a fact which the
Department confirmed by conducting an
inquiry with U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’). Therefore, pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), and consistent
with the Preliminary Results, we are
rescinding this review with respect to
Facor.
Final Results of the Review
These final results remain unchanged
from the Preliminary Results. We
provided an opportunity for parties to
comment on our preliminary results and
received no comments. Therefore, we
find that the following percentage
margin exists for the period February 1,
2004, through January 31, 2005:
Exporter/Manufacturer
Chandan Steel, Ltd. ......
Margin
21.02
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine, and
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries. For Chandan, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate entries at
the rate indicated above. The
Department will issue appropriate
assessment instructions directly to the
CBP within 15 days of publication of
these final results of review.
In accordance with the Department’s
clarification of its assessment policy
(see Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May
6, 2003)), in the event any entries were
made during the period of review
through intermediaries under the CBP
case number for Facor, the Department
will instruct CBP to liquidate such
entries at the all–others rate in effect on
the date of entry.
Cash Deposit Rates
The following antidumping duty
deposits will be required on all
shipments of SSB from India entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption, effective on or after the
publication date of these final results of
administrative review, as provided by
section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) the cash
deposit rates for the reviewed company
will be the rate listed above (except no
cash deposit will be required if a
company’s weighted–average margin is
de minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 percent);
(2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not listed above,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company–specific rate published for
the most recent period; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, the previous review, or the
original investigation, but the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Jun 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; and (4) if neither the
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm
covered in this or any previous reviews,
the cash deposit rate will be 12.45
percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate established
in the less than fair value investigation.
See Stainless Steel Bar from India; Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, 59 FR 66915 (December 28,
1994). These cash deposit requirements
shall remain in effect until publication
of the final results of the next
administrative review.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
Notification Regarding APOs
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders
(‘‘APOs’’) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305, which continues to govern
business proprietary information in this
segment of the proceeding. Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these
results of review in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: June 27, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–10386 Filed 6–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–580–834)
Notice of Final Results of Changed
Circumstances Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Stainless Steel
Sheet and Strip in Coils from the
Republic of Korea
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 12, 2006, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published a notice of
initiation and preliminary results of its
changed circumstances review of the
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel sheet and strip in coils (SSSSC)
from the Republic of Korea (Korea). See
Notice of Initiation and Preliminary
Results of Changed Circumstances
Antidumping Duty Review: Stainless
Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from the
Republic of Korea, 71 FR 27680 (May
12, 2006) (Preliminary Results). We have
now completed that review. For these
final results, as in the Preliminary
Results, we determine that: 1) Hyundai
Steel Company (Hyundai) is the
successor–in-interest to INI Steel
Company (INI), formerly Inchon Iron
and Steel Co., Ltd. (Inchon), a
respondent in the less–than-fair–value
(LTFV) investigation; and 2) SSSSC
produced and exported by Hyundai
should be excluded from the
antidumping duty order.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 10, 2006
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irina
Itkin or Brianne Riker, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–0656 and (202)
482–0629, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On July 27, 1999, the Department
published in the Federal Register (64
FR 40555) the antidumping duty order
on SSSSC from Korea. Inchon was
excluded from the order because its
dumping margin was de minimis in the
LTFV investigation. In 2001, INI
requested that the Department conduct
a changed circumstances review to
confirm that INI was the successor–ininterest to Inchon. On June 28, 2002, the
Department found that INI was the
successor–in-interest to Inchon and that
INI should be excluded from the
antidumping duty order on SSSSC from
E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM
03JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 127 (Monday, July 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37905-37906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10386]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A-533-810)
Notice of Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Stainless Steel Bar from India
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 7, 2006, the Department of Commerce published the
preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping
duty order on stainless steel bar from India. The period of review is
February 1, 2004, through January 31, 2005. This review covers sales of
stainless steel bar from India with respect to Chandan Steel, Ltd. We
provided interested parties with an opportunity to comment on the
preliminary results of this review, but received no comments. The final
results do not differ from the preliminary results of this review. We
will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess antidumping
duties on the subject merchandise exported by this company.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 3, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Holland, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1279.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Since the publication of the preliminary results of this review
(see Stainless Steel Bar from India: Notice of Preliminary Results and
Preliminary Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 71 FR 11390 (March 7, 2006) (``Preliminary Results'')), the
following events have occurred: the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') invited interested parties to comment on the preliminary
results of this review. No comments were received.
Scope of the Order
Merchandise covered by the order is shipments of stainless steel
bar (``SSB''). SSB means articles of stainless steel in straight
lengths that have been either hot-rolled, forged, turned, cold-drawn,
cold-rolled or otherwise cold-finished, or ground, having a uniform
solid cross section along their whole length in the shape of circles,
segments of circles, ovals, rectangles (including squares), triangles,
hexagons, octagons, or other convex polygons. SSB includes cold-
finished SSBs that are turned or ground in straight lengths, whether
produced from hot-rolled bar or from straightened and cut rod or wire,
and reinforcing bars that have indentations, ribs, grooves, or other
deformations produced during the rolling process.
Except as specified above, the term does not include stainless
steel semi-finished products, cut-to-length flat-rolled products (i.e.,
cut-to-length rolled products which if less than 4.75 mm in thickness
have a width measuring at least 10 times the thickness, or if 4.75 mm
or more in thickness having a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures
at least twice the thickness), wire (i.e., cold-formed products in
coils, of any uniform solid cross section along their whole length,
which do not conform to the definition of flat-rolled products), and
angles, shapes, and sections.
The SSB subject to these reviews is currently classifiable under
subheadings 7222.11.00.05, 7222.11.00.50, 7222.19.00.05, 7222.19.00.50,
7222.20.00.05, 7222.20.00.45, 7222.20.00.75, and 7222.30.00.00 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
On May 23, 2005, the Department issued a final scope ruling that
SSB manufactured in the United Arab Emirates out of stainless steel
wire rod from India is not subject to the scope of this proceeding. See
Memorandum to Barbara E. Tillman, Antidumping Duty Orders on Stainless
Steel Bar from India and Stainless Steel Wire Rod from India: Final
Scope Ruling (May 23, 2005). The ruling is on file in the Central
Records Unit, Room B-099 of the main Department building (``CRU'').
Period of Review
The period of review (``POR'') is February 1, 2004, through January
31, 2005.
Partial Rescission of Review
According to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the Department will rescind an
administrative review in whole or only with respect to a particular
exporter or producer, if we conclude that, during the POR, there were
no entries, exports, or sales of the subject merchandise, as the case
may be. In the Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily found
that Ferro Alloys Corporation, Ltd. (``Facor'') reported no entries of
[[Page 37906]]
subject merchandise to the United States during the POR, a fact which
the Department confirmed by conducting an inquiry with U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (``CBP''). Therefore, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(3), and consistent with the Preliminary Results, we are
rescinding this review with respect to Facor.
Final Results of the Review
These final results remain unchanged from the Preliminary Results.
We provided an opportunity for parties to comment on our preliminary
results and received no comments. Therefore, we find that the following
percentage margin exists for the period February 1, 2004, through
January 31, 2005:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exporter/Manufacturer Margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandan Steel, Ltd.................................. 21.02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries. For Chandan, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate entries at the rate indicated above. The Department will
issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to the CBP within 15
days of publication of these final results of review.
In accordance with the Department's clarification of its assessment
policy (see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003)), in the event any
entries were made during the period of review through intermediaries
under the CBP case number for Facor, the Department will instruct CBP
to liquidate such entries at the all-others rate in effect on the date
of entry.
Cash Deposit Rates
The following antidumping duty deposits will be required on all
shipments of SSB from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption, effective on or after the publication date of these final
results of administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(1) of
the Act: (1) the cash deposit rates for the reviewed company will be
the rate listed above (except no cash deposit will be required if a
company's weighted-average margin is de minimis, i.e., less than 0.5
percent); (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not
listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter
is not a firm covered in this review, the previous review, or the
original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most recent period for the
manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor
the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any previous reviews, the
cash deposit rate will be 12.45 percent, the ``all others'' rate
established in the less than fair value investigation. See Stainless
Steel Bar from India; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value, 59 FR 66915 (December 28, 1994). These cash deposit requirements
shall remain in effect until publication of the final results of the
next administrative review.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding APOs
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (``APOs'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these results of review in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 27, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-10386 Filed 6-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S