Proposed Establishment of the Outer Coastal Plain Viticultural Area (2003R-166P), 37870-37874 [E6-10384]
Download as PDF
37870
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
of fasteners, by doing all applicable actions
specified in the Accomplishment
Instructions of the ISB. Do all applicable
related investigative and corrective actions
before further flight in accordance with the
ISB, except as required by paragraph (g) of
this AD. Repeat the inspection at intervals
not to exceed 4,000 flight cycles or 24
months, whichever occurs first.
Exceptions to ISB Specifications
(g) BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Alert Inspection Service Bulletin (ISB)
ISB.57-a071, dated April 12, 2006, specifies
two provisions not specified in this AD.
(1) No inspection report is necessary.
(2) As an option, the ISB would allow
repairs specified in an approved BAE
Systems repair scheme. This AD instead
requires any repair using this option in
accordance with a method approved by
either the Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA; or the European Aviation Safety
Agency (or its delegated agent).
the Outer Coastal Plain viticultural area
in southeastern New Jersey. The
proposed viticultural area consists of
approximately 2,255,400 acres and
includes all of Cumberland, Cape May,
Atlantic, and Ocean Counties and
portions of Salem, Gloucester, Camden,
Burlington, and Monmouth Counties.
We designate viticultural areas to allow
bottlers to better describe the origin of
their wines and to allow consumers to
better identify the wines they may
purchase. We invite comments on this
proposed addition to our regulations.
DATES: We must receive written
comments on or before September 1,
2006.
27 CFR Part 9
You may send comments to
any of the following addresses:
• Director, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Attn: Notice No. 59, P.O.
Box 14412, Washington, DC 20044–
4412.
• 202–927–8525 (facsimile).
• nprm@ttb.gov (e-mail).
• https://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/
index.htm. An online comment form is
posted with this notice on our Web site.
• https://www.regulations.gov (Federal
e-rulemaking portal; follow instructions
for submitting comments).
You may view copies of this notice,
the petition, the appropriate maps, and
any comments we receive about this
proposal by appointment at the TTB
Information Resource Center, 1310 G
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220. To
make an appointment, call 202–927–
2400. You may also access copies of the
notice and comments online at https://
www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm.
See the Public Participation section of
this notice for specific instructions and
requirements for submitting comments,
and for information on how to request
a public hearing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Berry, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, Regulations and
Rulings Division, P.O. Box 18152,
Roanoke, VA 24014; telephone 540–
344–9333.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[Notice No. 59]
Background on Viticultural Areas
RIN: 1513–AB13
TTB Authority
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested in accordance with
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Related Information
(i) The subject of this AD is also addressed
in European Aviation Safety Agency
emergency airworthiness directive 2006–
0091–E, dated April 20, 2006.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 23,
2006.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–10352 Filed 6–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL_1
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
Proposed Establishment of the Outer
Coastal Plain Viticultural Area (2003R–
166P)
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau proposes to establish
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Jun 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
ADDRESSES:
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (the FAA Act, 27
U.S.C. 201 et seq.) requires that alcohol
beverage labels provide consumers with
adequate information regarding product
identity and prohibits the use of
misleading information on those labels.
The FAA Act also authorizes the
Secretary of the Treasury to issue
regulations to carry out its provisions.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau (TTB) administers these
regulations.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) allows the establishment of
definitive viticultural areas and the use
of their names as appellations of origin
on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) contains the
list of approved viticultural areas.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region
distinguishable by geographical
features, the boundaries of which have
been recognized and defined in part 9
of the regulations. These designations
allow vintners and consumers to
attribute a given quality, reputation, or
other characteristic of a wine made from
grapes grown in an area to its
geographical origin. The establishment
of viticultural areas allows vintners to
describe more accurately the origin of
their wines to consumers and helps
consumers to identify wines they may
purchase. Establishment of a viticultural
area is neither an approval nor an
endorsement by TTB of the wine
produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations outlines the procedure for
proposing an American viticultural area
and provides that any interested party
may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as a viticultural area.
Section 9.3(b) of the TTB regulations
requires the petition to include—
• Evidence that the proposed
viticultural area is locally and/or
nationally known by the name specified
in the petition;
• Historical or current evidence that
supports setting the boundary of the
proposed viticultural area as the
petition specifies;
• Evidence relating to the
geographical features, such as climate,
soils, elevation, and physical features,
that distinguish the proposed
viticultural area from surrounding areas;
• A description of the specific
boundary of the proposed viticultural
area, based on features found on United
States Geological Survey (USGS) maps;
and
• A copy of the appropriate USGS
map(s) with the proposed viticultural
area’s boundary prominently marked.
Outer Coastal Plain Petition
James Quarella of Bellview Winery,
Landisville, New Jersey, petitioned TTB
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL_1
to establish the ‘‘Outer Coastal Plain’’ as
an American viticultural area in
southeastern New Jersey. The proposed
viticultural area covers approximately
2,255,400 acres and includes all of
Cumberland, Cape May, Atlantic, and
Ocean Counties and portions of Salem,
Gloucester, Camden, Burlington, and
Monmouth Counties. According to the
petitioner, the area currently includes
thirteen wineries, several vineyards, and
approximately 750 acres planted to
vines. We summarize below the
evidence submitted in support of the
petition.
Name Evidence
The Outer Coastal Plain is one of five
defined physiographic regions of New
Jersey. The other regions are the Inner
Coastal Plain, the Newark Basin
Piedmont, the Highlands, and the
Appalachian Valley and Ridge.
The Outer Coastal Plain includes most
of the State’s Atlantic coastline and the
area known as the ‘‘Pinelands.’’ The
petitioner states that most geology
reference sources and such government
entities as the New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection, USGS, and
the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA), call the region the
‘‘Outer Coastal Plain.’’
As evidence that the proposed
viticultural area is known locally and
nationally by this name, the petitioner
submitted several documents that
identify the area as the ‘‘Outer Coastal
Plain.’’ These included—
• A map from a National Park Service
Web site showing landform regions in
New Jersey (https://www.cr.nps.gov/
history/online_books/nj2/chap1.htm.);
• A map entitled ‘‘Geographic
Boundaries of the Outer Coastal Plain
(OCP) of New Jersey,’’ issued by the
New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection; and
• A list of native trees and shrubs for
the Outer Coastal Plain on the Web site
of the New Jersey Agricultural
Experiment Station/Cook College,
Rutgers, The State University of New
Jersey (https://www.rce.rutgers.edu/
njriparianforestbuffers/
nativeOUTER.htm.).
The Outer Coastal Plain is part of the
Atlantic Coastal Plain, an extensive
seaward-sloping plain stretching about
2,200 miles along the coast of the
Eastern United States from
Massachusetts to Florida. It consists of
an inner and outer coastal plain.
Boundary Evidence
The Outer Coastal Plain encompasses
the southeastern part of the State of New
Jersey. The proposed area is roughly
triangular in shape and comprises the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Jun 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
most easterly and southerly portions of
New Jersey, including most of the
State’s Atlantic coastline and the area
known as the ‘‘Pinelands’’ or ‘‘Pine
Barrens.’’ According to the petitioner,
the geographical and geological features
that define the boundaries of the
proposed viticultural area clearly
distinguish it from surrounding areas.
The proposed viticultural area’s
proximity to the Atlantic Ocean and
Delaware Bay greatly influences its
climate and geological features, such as
soils and underlying sediments. These
features are described in greater detail
in the following section.
The Atlantic Ocean coastline,
including its barrier islands, forms the
area’s eastern boundary, and Delaware
Bay forms its southern boundary. The
diagonal western boundary is
immediately east of a belt of low hills,
called cuestas. These cuestas, which
extend in a northeasterly direction from
the Delaware River lowlands in the
southwest to the Atlantic Highlands
overlooking Raritan Bay in the
northeast, separate the proposed area
from the Inner Coastal Plain. The
diagonal western boundary meets the
eastern boundary within the city of
Long Branch, New Jersey, on the
Atlantic coastline.
As historical evidence for these
proposed boundaries, the petitioner
cited the area’s long viticultural history.
According to evidence that the
petitioner submitted, viticulture
flourished in the area as early as the
mid-nineteenth century. Egg Harbor
City, New Jersey, was the center of a
thriving wine industry with hundreds of
acres of grapes. In 1864, Louis Renault
established Renault Winery in Egg
Harbor City, where he found the soils
and climate to be similar to those of his
native Rheims, France. Today, Renault
Winery is one of the oldest, continuous
winery operations in the United States.
Around the same time, Dr. Thomas
Welch founded the U.S. grape juice
industry in Vineland, New Jersey, with
a product that became known as
Welch’s Grape Juice. Although
Prohibition devastated the area’s
wineries, the wine industry has made a
strong comeback in recent years, due
largely to the New Jersey Farm Winery
Act of 1981. The number of wineries in
the State jumped from 9 in 1981 to 27
today, 13 of which are in the proposed
area.
Distinguishing Features
Soils and Geology
The petitioner asserts that the soils
and geology of the proposed viticultural
area clearly distinguish it from
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37871
surrounding areas. Despite its large
landmass, the Outer Coastal Plain has
remarkably uniform, well drained sandy
soils that derived from unconsolidated
sediments. The relatively low fertility
and low pH of these soils, the petitioner
notes, are favorable for grape growing.
In contrast to the soils of the Outer
Coastal Plain, the fine, silty soils of the
Inner Coastal Plain to the west have
both higher fertility and higher pH and
the soils to the north are dense, rocky,
and derived from bedrock.
As evidence of the proposed
viticultural area’s distinctive geology,
the petitioner submitted a document
entitled ‘‘Geologic Map of New Jersey.’’
Published by the State’s Department of
Environmental Protection, this map
clearly shows that most of the Outer
Coastal Plain is underlain by
unconsolidated deposits of sand, silt,
and clay of the Tertiary period and that
a small coastal fringe consists of beach
and estuarine deposits of the Holocene
epoch. The parent material of soils in
other parts of the State formed in later
geologic periods. The Inner Coastal
Plain, in contrast, is underlain by sand,
silt, and clay of the Cretaceous period,
and the northern regions of the State are
underlain by sedimentary, igneous, and
metamorphic rocks of still later geologic
periods.
According to the petitioner, a unique
feature of the proposed viticultural area
is its significant aquifers, particularly
the Cohansey aquifer, the largest
freshwater aquifer in the mid-Atlantic
region. The petitioner states that this
aquifer is so important to the region’s
drainage and water supply that it was
one of the reasons the Pinelands
National Reserve was created as a
federally protected area. The Cohansey
aquifer is part of the 1.93-million-acre
Kirkwood-Cohansey aquifer system, the
borders of which nearly correspond to
those of the proposed viticultural area.
These aquifers, the petitioner notes,
provide an abundant source of water for
the proposed viticultural area’s
vineyards. In contrast, the adjacent
Inner Coastal Plain has smaller,
confined aquifers, which are mostly in
the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer
system.
Elevation
The petitioner states that the
proposed viticultural area’s elevation is
another feature that distinguishes it
from adjacent areas. According to an
elevation map issued by the New Jersey
Geological Survey, almost the entire
area has elevations of less than 280 feet
above sea level, and most of the area has
elevations significantly below that
height. The petitioner notes that the
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
37872
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
proposed viticultural area’s low
elevation and proximity to the Atlantic
Ocean are moderating influences on its
climate, as described below. Elevations
in the other regions of New Jersey are
higher. Elevations in the northwestern
part of the State, for example, range
from 1,300 to 1,680 feet.
Climate
According to the petitioner, the
climate of the Outer Coastal Plain is
strongly influenced by the Atlantic
Ocean to the east and Delaware Bay to
the south. Because of this maritime
influence on its climate, the proposed
viticultural area is generally warmer,
has a longer growing season, and has
more moderate temperatures than areas
to the west and north. As evidence of
the maritime influence, the petitioner
submitted a USDA plant hardiness zone
map of New Jersey and noted that the
proposed viticultural area is in zones
6B, 7A, or 7B, while areas to the north
and west are in cooler zones and have
shorter growing seasons. The petitioner
also submitted a climate overview
published on the Web site of the New
Jersey State Climatologist. (See https://
climate.Rutgers.edu/stateclim_v1/
njclimoverview.html.) The overview
shows that the proposed viticultural
area ranges between 190 and 217 freezefree days per year. In contrast, the
Highlands region to the north averages
163 freeze-free days and the central
Piedmont region averages 179 freezefree days. The petitioner notes that
because of these climatic differences,
more temperature-sensitive grape
varieties may be grown in vineyards
within the proposed viticultural area
than in vineyards in other adjacent
regions.
Boundary Description
See the narrative boundary
description of the petitioned-for
viticultural area in the proposed
regulatory text published at the end of
this notice.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL_1
Maps
The petitioner provided the required
maps, and we list them below in the
proposed regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits
any label reference on a wine that
indicates or implies an origin other than
the wine’s true place of origin. If we
establish this proposed viticultural area,
its name, ‘‘Outer Coastal Plain,’’ will be
recognized under 27 CFR 4.39(i)(3) as a
name of viticultural significance. The
text of the new regulation would clarify
this point. Consequently, wine bottlers
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Jun 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
using ‘‘Outer Coastal Plain’’ in a brand
name, including a trademark, or in
another label reference as to the origin
of the wine, will have to ensure that the
product is eligible to use the viticultural
area’s name as an appellation of origin.
On the other hand, we do not believe
that any single part of the proposed
viticultural area name standing alone
would have viticultural significance if
the new area is established.
Accordingly, the proposed part 9
regulatory text set forth in this
document specifies only the full ‘‘Outer
Coastal Plain’’ name as a term of
viticultural significance for purposes of
part 4 of the TTB regulations.
For a wine to be eligible to use as an
appellation of origin a viticultural area
name or other term specified as being
viticulturally significant in part 9 of the
TTB regulations, at least 85 percent of
the wine must be derived from grapes
grown within the area represented by
that name or other term, and the wine
must meet the other conditions listed in
27 CFR 4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not
eligible to use the viticultural area name
or other term as an appellation of origin
and that name or term appears in the
brand name, then the label is not in
compliance and the bottler must change
the brand name and obtain approval of
a new label. Similarly, if the viticultural
area name or other term appears in
another reference on the label in a
misleading manner, the bottler would
have to obtain approval of a new label.
Accordingly, if a new label or a
previously approved label uses the
name ‘‘Outer Coastal Plain’’ for a wine
that does not meet the 85 percent
standard, the new label will not be
approved, and the previously approved
label will be subject to revocation, upon
the effective date of the approval of the
Outer Coastal Plain viticultural area.
Different rules apply if a wine has a
brand name containing a viticultural
area name that was used as a brand
name on a label approved before July 7,
1986. See 27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
Public Participation
Comments Invited
We invite comments from interested
members of the public on whether we
should establish the proposed
viticultural area. We are also interested
in receiving comments on the
sufficiency and accuracy of the name,
boundary, climatic, and other required
information submitted in support of the
petition. Please provide any available
specific information in support of your
comments.
Because of the potential impact of the
establishment of the proposed Outer
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Coastal Plain viticultural area on brand
labels that include the words ‘‘Outer
Coastal Plain’’ as discussed above under
‘‘Impact on Current Wine Labels,’’ we
are particularly interested in comments
regarding whether there will be a
conflict between the proposed area
name and currently used brand names.
If a commenter believes that a conflict
will arise, the comment should describe
the nature of that conflict, including any
negative economic impact that approval
of the proposed viticultural area will
have on an existing viticultural
enterprise. We are also interested in
receiving suggestions for ways to avoid
any conflicts, for example by adopting
a modified or different name for the
viticultural area.
In addition, TTB is interested in
comments regarding the noninclusion
within the proposed viticultural area of
areas within other States that are part of
the Atlantic Coastal Plain and that may
therefore also have a claim to use of the
name ‘‘Outer Coastal Plain,’’ including
information on any wine grape-growing
in those areas. In this regard, we invite
comments on whether the name ‘‘New
Jersey Outer Coastal Plain’’ would more
appropriately identify the proposed
viticultural area. Comments in this
regard should include documentation or
other information supporting the
conclusion that use of ‘‘New Jersey
Outer Coastal Plain’’ rather than only
‘‘Outer Coastal Plain’’ on a wine label
would better enable consumers and
vintners to attribute to the wine in
question the quality, reputation, or other
characteristic of wine made from grapes
grown in the proposed viticultural area.
Submitting Comments
Please submit your comments by the
closing date shown above in this notice.
Your comments must include this
notice number and your name and
mailing address. Your comments must
be legible and written in language
acceptable for public disclosure. We do
not acknowledge receipt of comments,
and we consider all comments to be
originals. You may submit comments in
one of five ways:
• Mail: You may send written
comments to TTB at the address listed
in the ADDRESSES section.
• Facsimile: You may submit
comments by facsimile transmission to
202–927–8525. Faxed comments must—
(1) Be on 8.5- by 11-inch paper;
(2) Contain a legible, written
signature; and
(3) Be no more than five pages long.
This limitation assures electronic access
to our equipment. We will not accept
faxed comments that exceed five pages.
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
substantial number of small entities.
The proposed regulation imposes no
new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit
derived from the use of a viticultural
area name would be the result of a
proprietor’s efforts and consumer
acceptance of wines from that area.
Therefore, no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required.
Confidentiality
All submitted material is part of the
public record and subject to disclosure.
Do not enclose any material in your
comments that you consider to be
confidential or inappropriate for public
disclosure.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL_1
• E-mail: You may e-mail comments
to nprm@ttb.gov. Comments transmitted
by electronic mail must—
(1) Contain your e-mail address;
(2) Reference this notice number on
the subject line; and
(3) Be legible when printed on 8.5- by
11-inch paper.
• Online form: We provide a
comment form with the online copy of
this notice on our Web site at https://
www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm.
Select the ‘‘Send comments via e-mail’’
link under this notice number.
• Federal e-rulemaking portal: To
submit comments to us via the Federal
e-rulemaking portal, visit https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
You may also write to the
Administrator before the comment
closing date to ask for a public hearing.
The Administrator reserves the right to
determine whether to hold a public
hearing.
Proposed Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, we propose to amend 27 CFR,
chapter 1, part 9, as follows:
Public Disclosure
You may view copies of this notice,
the petition, the appropriate maps, and
any comments we receive by
appointment at the TTB Information
Resource Center at 1310 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20220. You may also
obtain copies at 20 cents per 8.5- x 11inch page. Contact our information
specialist at the above address or by
telephone at 202–927–2400 to schedule
an appointment or to request copies of
comments.
We will post this notice and any
comments we receive on this proposal
on the TTB Web site. All name and
address information submitted with the
comments will be posted, including email addresses. We may omit
voluminous attachments or material that
we consider unsuitable for posting. In
all cases, the full comment will be
available in the TTB Information
Resource Center. To access the online
copy of this notice and the submitted
comments, visit https://www.ttb.gov/
alcohol/rules/index.htm. Select the
‘‘View Comments’’ link under this
notice number to view the posted
comments.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that this proposed
regulation, if adopted, would not have
a significant economic impact on a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Jun 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by
Executive Order 12866, 58 FR 51735.
Therefore, it requires no regulatory
assessment.
Drafting Information
Jennifer Berry and Linda Chapman of
the Regulations and Rulings Division
drafted this notice.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL
AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C—Approved American
Viticultural Areas
2. Amend subpart C by adding
§ 9.ll to read as follows:
§ 9.ll
Outer Coastal Plain.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural
area described in this section is ‘‘Outer
Coastal Plain’’. For purposes of part 4 of
this chapter, ‘‘Outer Coastal Plain’’ is a
term of viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The appropriate
maps for determining the boundary of
the Outer Coastal Plain viticultural area
are seven United States Geological
Survey topographic maps. They are
titled—
(1) Wilmington, Delaware-New JerseyPennsylvania-Maryland, 1984,
1:100,000 scale;
(2) Hammonton, New Jersey, 1984,
1:100,000 scale;
(3) Trenton, New Jersey-PennsylvaniaNew York, 1986, 1:100,000 scale;
(4) Long Branch, New Jersey, 1954,
photorevised 1981, 1:24,000 scale;
(5) Atlantic City, New Jersey, 1984,
1:100,000 scale;
(6) Cape May, New Jersey, 1981,
1:100,000 scale; and
(7) Dover, Delaware-New JerseyMaryland, 1984, 1:100,000 scale.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37873
(c) Boundary. The Outer Coastal Plain
viticultural area includes all of
Cumberland, Cape May, Atlantic, and
Ocean Counties and portions of Salem,
Gloucester, Camden, Burlington, and
Monmouth Counties in the State of New
Jersey. The boundary of the Outer
Coastal Plain viticultural area is as
described below.
(1) The beginning point is on the
Wilmington map at the confluence of
Alloway Creek with the Delaware River
(within Mad Horse Creek State Wildlife
Management Area) in Salem County;
(2) From the beginning point, proceed
northeasterly in a straight line to the
village of Hagerville; then
(3) Continue north on an unnamed
road locally known as County Road (CR)
658 to its intersection with State Route
(SR) 49; then
(4) Proceed northwesterly on SR 49 to
its intersection with SR 45 in the center
of the town of Salem; then
(5) Proceed northeasterly on SR 45 to
its intersection with SR 540 at the
village of Pointers; then
(6) Proceed north on SR 540 into the
village of Slapes Corner; then
(7) In Slapes Corner, proceed
northeasterly on an unnamed road
locally known as CR 646 to its
intersection with the New Jersey
Turnpike near the village of Auburn;
then
(8) Proceed northeasterly on the New
Jersey Turnpike for approximately 18
miles to its intersection with SR 47;
then
(9) Proceed south on SR 47 for
approximately 0.5 mile to its
intersection with SR 534 at the village
of Gardenville Center; then
(10) Proceed southeasterly through
Gardenville Center on SR 534 to its
intersection with SR 544; then
(11) Proceed northeasterly on SR 544
to its intersection with SR 73 on the
Hammonton map; then
(12) Proceed north-northwesterly on
SR 73 to its intersection with SR 70 in
Cropwell; then
(13) Proceed east on SR 70 to its
intersection with U.S. 206 in Red Lion;
then
(14) Proceed north on U.S. 206, onto
the Trenton map, to the village of
Chambers Corner; then
(15) Proceed northeasterly on an
unnamed road locally known as CR 537,
through the village of Jobstown; then
(16) Continue northeasterly on CR
537, through the villages of Smithburg
and Freehold, to its intersection with SR
18; then
(17) Proceed easterly on SR 18 to its
intersection with the Garden State
Parkway; then
(18) Proceed north on the Garden
State Parkway and immediately exit
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
37874
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
onto SR 36 East and onto the Long
Branch map; then
(19) Using the Long Branch map,
continue east on SR 36 to where it
intersects with Joline Avenue; then
(20) Proceed northeasterly on Joline
Avenue to the Atlantic Ocean shoreline;
then
(21) Follow the Atlantic Ocean
shoreline south, encompassing all
coastal islands, onto the Trenton,
Hammonton, Atlantic City, and Cape
May maps, to the city of Cape May; then
(22) Proceed west, then north, along
the eastern bank of the Delaware River,
onto the Atlantic City, Dover, and
Wilmington maps to the beginning
point.
Signed: June 26, 2006.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6–10384 Filed 6–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service
30 CFR Part 250
RIN 1010–AD18
Oil and Gas and Sulphur Operations in
the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)—
Revisions to Subpart A—General;
Subpart I—Platforms and Structures;
and Subpart J—Pipelines and Pipeline
Rights-of-Way
Minerals Management Service
(MMS), Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL_1
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: MMS is proposing to amend
its regulations to require lessees, lease
operators, and pipeline right-of-way
(ROW) holders to submit assessment
information on the structural integrity of
their OCS platforms each year, and to
submit an inspection program to MMS
yearly. Also, a damage report would be
required if a facility or pipeline was
damaged by a hurricane or other natural
phenomena. Lessees, lease operators,
and pipeline ROW holders proposing to
use unbonded flexible pipe for
pipelines, or to install pipeline risers on
floating platforms, would have to
provide additional information on their
projects. The proposed rule also would
incorporate an industry-developed
standard concerning the in-service
inspection of mooring hardware for
floating drilling units. These proposed
changes would allow MMS to better
regulate the safety of the oil and gas
infrastructure, and to promptly assess
damage resulting from hurricanes or
other natural phenomena.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Jun 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
Submit comments by September
1, 2006. MMS may not fully consider
comments received after this date.
Submit comments to the Office of
Management and Budget on the
information collection burden in this
rulemaking by August 2, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the rulemaking by any of the
following methods. Please use the
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
1010–AD18 as an identifier in your
message. See also Public Comment
Procedures under Procedural Matters.
• MMS’s Public Connect on-line
commenting system, https://
ocsconnect.mms.gov. Follow the
instructions on the Web site for
submitting comments.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions on the Web site for
submitting comments.
• E-mail MMS at
rules.comments@mms.gov. Use the RIN
1010–AD18 in the subject line.
• Fax: 703–787–1546. Identify with
the RIN, 1010–AD18.
• Mail or hand-carry comments to the
Department of the Interior; Minerals
Management Service; Attention: Rules
Processing Team (RPT); 381 Elden
Street, MS–4024; Herndon, Virginia
20170–4817. Please reference 1010–
AD18 in your comments and include
your name and return address.
• Send comments on the information
collection in this rule to: Interior Desk
Officer 1010–AD18, Office of
Management and Budget, 202/395–6566
(facsimile); e-mail:
oira_docket@omb.eop.gov. Please also
send a copy to MMS.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry Ake, Regulations and Standards
Branch at (703) 787–1567.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July
19, 2005, MMS published a final rule
(70 FR 41556) titled ‘‘Fixed and Floating
Platforms and Structures and
Documents Incorporated by Reference’’
in the Federal Register. That final rule
expanded MMS regulations regarding
the design, construction, and operation
of OCS facilities to include coverage of
floating oil and gas production
platforms. The rule also incorporated by
reference a number of industrydeveloped standards pertaining to
floating platforms. During the process of
developing and publishing that final
rule, comments were received, both
from the public and internally within
MMS, that suggested additional
requirements. MMS has since reviewed
the suggested changes and is
incorporating those with the greatest
merit in this proposed rule.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The first of these proposed revisions
was suggested by both the Offshore
Operator’s Committee (OOC) and Shell
Oil Company. They suggested that MMS
consider adopting American Petroleum
Institute Recommended Practice (API
RP) 2I, ‘‘In-Service Inspection of
Mooring Hardware for Floating Drilling
Units.’’
MMS agrees that API RP 2I, second
edition, would be a valuable industry
standard to consider for incorporation
by reference into 30 CFR part 250,
subparts A and I. API RP 2I is
specifically written to address the
inspection of mooring chain and wire
rope for Mobile Offshore Drilling Units
(MODUs), which frequently move from
location to location. Moreover, the
detailed information provided in API RP
2I on failure modes, inspection
methods, and repair methods also could
be useful in the development and
implementation of the in-service
inspection plan required under
§ 250.919(a) for other types of offshore
floating facilities that remain on station
for longer periods of time. Based on
OOC’s and Shell’s recommendation,
MMS has reviewed API RP 2I, ‘‘InService Inspection of Mooring Hardware
for Floating Drilling Units,’’ and is
proposing that it be incorporated by
reference into our regulations. MMS
welcomes further industry comments on
the referencing of this document in
subparts A and I.
Subpart I currently requires that
lessees and operators develop an inservice inspection plan for platforms
(§ 250.919). The plan must show in
detail the type, extent, and frequency of
the inspections lessees and operators
will conduct on platforms. The existing
regulation does not specify when the
plan must be submitted to MMS for
approval. MMS is now proposing that
the plan be submitted to the Regional
Supervisor for approval each year by
April 1.
The proposed rule would add several
requirements to subpart I, Platforms and
Structures, to reflect MMS’s concerns
about the aging infrastructure on the
OCS. These proposed new requirements
are meant to help ensure that lessees,
lease operators, and pipeline ROW
holders are appropriately assessing their
OCS structures to ascertain their fitness
for continued use. Included in the
proposed revisions to § 250.920 are the
following: (1) A complete platform
structural assessment analysis if the
platform meets one or more platform
assessment initiators; (2) platform
mitigation actions, which must be
approved by the Regional Supervisor, if
the platform does not pass the
assessment; (3) approval from the
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 127 (Monday, July 3, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37870-37874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10384]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Notice No. 59]
RIN: 1513-AB13
Proposed Establishment of the Outer Coastal Plain Viticultural
Area (2003R-166P)
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau proposes to
establish the Outer Coastal Plain viticultural area in southeastern New
Jersey. The proposed viticultural area consists of approximately
2,255,400 acres and includes all of Cumberland, Cape May, Atlantic, and
Ocean Counties and portions of Salem, Gloucester, Camden, Burlington,
and Monmouth Counties. We designate viticultural areas to allow
bottlers to better describe the origin of their wines and to allow
consumers to better identify the wines they may purchase. We invite
comments on this proposed addition to our regulations.
DATES: We must receive written comments on or before September 1, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments to any of the following addresses:
Director, Regulations and Rulings Division, Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Attn: Notice No. 59, P.O. Box 14412,
Washington, DC 20044-4412.
202-927-8525 (facsimile).
nprm@ttb.gov (e-mail).
https://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm. An online
comment form is posted with this notice on our Web site.
https://www.regulations.gov (Federal e-rulemaking portal;
follow instructions for submitting comments).
You may view copies of this notice, the petition, the appropriate
maps, and any comments we receive about this proposal by appointment at
the TTB Information Resource Center, 1310 G Street, NW., Washington, DC
20220. To make an appointment, call 202-927-2400. You may also access
copies of the notice and comments online at https://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/
rules/index.htm.
See the Public Participation section of this notice for specific
instructions and requirements for submitting comments, and for
information on how to request a public hearing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Berry, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, Regulations and Rulings Division, P.O. Box 18152,
Roanoke, VA 24014; telephone 540-344-9333.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (the FAA
Act, 27 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) requires that alcohol beverage labels
provide consumers with adequate information regarding product identity
and prohibits the use of misleading information on those labels. The
FAA Act also authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to issue
regulations to carry out its provisions. The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers these regulations.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) allows the
establishment of definitive viticultural areas and the use of their
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) contains
the list of approved viticultural areas.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region distinguishable by geographical features, the boundaries
of which have been recognized and defined in part 9 of the regulations.
These designations allow vintners and consumers to attribute a given
quality, reputation, or other characteristic of a wine made from grapes
grown in an area to its geographical origin. The establishment of
viticultural areas allows vintners to describe more accurately the
origin of their wines to consumers and helps consumers to identify
wines they may purchase. Establishment of a viticultural area is
neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine produced in
that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations outlines the procedure
for proposing an American viticultural area and provides that any
interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region
as a viticultural area. Section 9.3(b) of the TTB regulations requires
the petition to include--
Evidence that the proposed viticultural area is locally
and/or nationally known by the name specified in the petition;
Historical or current evidence that supports setting the
boundary of the proposed viticultural area as the petition specifies;
Evidence relating to the geographical features, such as
climate, soils, elevation, and physical features, that distinguish the
proposed viticultural area from surrounding areas;
A description of the specific boundary of the proposed
viticultural area, based on features found on United States Geological
Survey (USGS) maps; and
A copy of the appropriate USGS map(s) with the proposed
viticultural area's boundary prominently marked.
Outer Coastal Plain Petition
James Quarella of Bellview Winery, Landisville, New Jersey,
petitioned TTB
[[Page 37871]]
to establish the ``Outer Coastal Plain'' as an American viticultural
area in southeastern New Jersey. The proposed viticultural area covers
approximately 2,255,400 acres and includes all of Cumberland, Cape May,
Atlantic, and Ocean Counties and portions of Salem, Gloucester, Camden,
Burlington, and Monmouth Counties. According to the petitioner, the
area currently includes thirteen wineries, several vineyards, and
approximately 750 acres planted to vines. We summarize below the
evidence submitted in support of the petition.
Name Evidence
The Outer Coastal Plain is one of five defined physiographic
regions of New Jersey. The other regions are the Inner Coastal Plain,
the Newark Basin Piedmont, the Highlands, and the Appalachian Valley
and Ridge.
The Outer Coastal Plain includes most of the State's Atlantic
coastline and the area known as the ``Pinelands.'' The petitioner
states that most geology reference sources and such government entities
as the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, USGS, and the
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), call the region the
``Outer Coastal Plain.''
As evidence that the proposed viticultural area is known locally
and nationally by this name, the petitioner submitted several documents
that identify the area as the ``Outer Coastal Plain.'' These included--
A map from a National Park Service Web site showing
landform regions in New Jersey (https://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_
books/nj2/chap1.htm.);
A map entitled ``Geographic Boundaries of the Outer
Coastal Plain (OCP) of New Jersey,'' issued by the New Jersey
Department of Environmental Protection; and
A list of native trees and shrubs for the Outer Coastal
Plain on the Web site of the New Jersey Agricultural Experiment
Station/Cook College, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
(https://www.rce.rutgers.edu/njriparianforestbuffers/nativeOUTER.htm.).
The Outer Coastal Plain is part of the Atlantic Coastal Plain, an
extensive seaward-sloping plain stretching about 2,200 miles along the
coast of the Eastern United States from Massachusetts to Florida. It
consists of an inner and outer coastal plain.
Boundary Evidence
The Outer Coastal Plain encompasses the southeastern part of the
State of New Jersey. The proposed area is roughly triangular in shape
and comprises the most easterly and southerly portions of New Jersey,
including most of the State's Atlantic coastline and the area known as
the ``Pinelands'' or ``Pine Barrens.'' According to the petitioner, the
geographical and geological features that define the boundaries of the
proposed viticultural area clearly distinguish it from surrounding
areas. The proposed viticultural area's proximity to the Atlantic Ocean
and Delaware Bay greatly influences its climate and geological
features, such as soils and underlying sediments. These features are
described in greater detail in the following section.
The Atlantic Ocean coastline, including its barrier islands, forms
the area's eastern boundary, and Delaware Bay forms its southern
boundary. The diagonal western boundary is immediately east of a belt
of low hills, called cuestas. These cuestas, which extend in a
northeasterly direction from the Delaware River lowlands in the
southwest to the Atlantic Highlands overlooking Raritan Bay in the
northeast, separate the proposed area from the Inner Coastal Plain. The
diagonal western boundary meets the eastern boundary within the city of
Long Branch, New Jersey, on the Atlantic coastline.
As historical evidence for these proposed boundaries, the
petitioner cited the area's long viticultural history. According to
evidence that the petitioner submitted, viticulture flourished in the
area as early as the mid-nineteenth century. Egg Harbor City, New
Jersey, was the center of a thriving wine industry with hundreds of
acres of grapes. In 1864, Louis Renault established Renault Winery in
Egg Harbor City, where he found the soils and climate to be similar to
those of his native Rheims, France. Today, Renault Winery is one of the
oldest, continuous winery operations in the United States. Around the
same time, Dr. Thomas Welch founded the U.S. grape juice industry in
Vineland, New Jersey, with a product that became known as Welch's Grape
Juice. Although Prohibition devastated the area's wineries, the wine
industry has made a strong comeback in recent years, due largely to the
New Jersey Farm Winery Act of 1981. The number of wineries in the State
jumped from 9 in 1981 to 27 today, 13 of which are in the proposed
area.
Distinguishing Features
Soils and Geology
The petitioner asserts that the soils and geology of the proposed
viticultural area clearly distinguish it from surrounding areas.
Despite its large landmass, the Outer Coastal Plain has remarkably
uniform, well drained sandy soils that derived from unconsolidated
sediments. The relatively low fertility and low pH of these soils, the
petitioner notes, are favorable for grape growing. In contrast to the
soils of the Outer Coastal Plain, the fine, silty soils of the Inner
Coastal Plain to the west have both higher fertility and higher pH and
the soils to the north are dense, rocky, and derived from bedrock.
As evidence of the proposed viticultural area's distinctive
geology, the petitioner submitted a document entitled ``Geologic Map of
New Jersey.'' Published by the State's Department of Environmental
Protection, this map clearly shows that most of the Outer Coastal Plain
is underlain by unconsolidated deposits of sand, silt, and clay of the
Tertiary period and that a small coastal fringe consists of beach and
estuarine deposits of the Holocene epoch. The parent material of soils
in other parts of the State formed in later geologic periods. The Inner
Coastal Plain, in contrast, is underlain by sand, silt, and clay of the
Cretaceous period, and the northern regions of the State are underlain
by sedimentary, igneous, and metamorphic rocks of still later geologic
periods.
According to the petitioner, a unique feature of the proposed
viticultural area is its significant aquifers, particularly the
Cohansey aquifer, the largest freshwater aquifer in the mid-Atlantic
region. The petitioner states that this aquifer is so important to the
region's drainage and water supply that it was one of the reasons the
Pinelands National Reserve was created as a federally protected area.
The Cohansey aquifer is part of the 1.93-million-acre Kirkwood-Cohansey
aquifer system, the borders of which nearly correspond to those of the
proposed viticultural area. These aquifers, the petitioner notes,
provide an abundant source of water for the proposed viticultural
area's vineyards. In contrast, the adjacent Inner Coastal Plain has
smaller, confined aquifers, which are mostly in the Potomac-Raritan-
Magothy aquifer system.
Elevation
The petitioner states that the proposed viticultural area's
elevation is another feature that distinguishes it from adjacent areas.
According to an elevation map issued by the New Jersey Geological
Survey, almost the entire area has elevations of less than 280 feet
above sea level, and most of the area has elevations significantly
below that height. The petitioner notes that the
[[Page 37872]]
proposed viticultural area's low elevation and proximity to the
Atlantic Ocean are moderating influences on its climate, as described
below. Elevations in the other regions of New Jersey are higher.
Elevations in the northwestern part of the State, for example, range
from 1,300 to 1,680 feet.
Climate
According to the petitioner, the climate of the Outer Coastal Plain
is strongly influenced by the Atlantic Ocean to the east and Delaware
Bay to the south. Because of this maritime influence on its climate,
the proposed viticultural area is generally warmer, has a longer
growing season, and has more moderate temperatures than areas to the
west and north. As evidence of the maritime influence, the petitioner
submitted a USDA plant hardiness zone map of New Jersey and noted that
the proposed viticultural area is in zones 6B, 7A, or 7B, while areas
to the north and west are in cooler zones and have shorter growing
seasons. The petitioner also submitted a climate overview published on
the Web site of the New Jersey State Climatologist. (See https://
climate.Rutgers.edu/stateclim--v1/njclimoverview.html.) The overview
shows that the proposed viticultural area ranges between 190 and 217
freeze-free days per year. In contrast, the Highlands region to the
north averages 163 freeze-free days and the central Piedmont region
averages 179 freeze-free days. The petitioner notes that because of
these climatic differences, more temperature-sensitive grape varieties
may be grown in vineyards within the proposed viticultural area than in
vineyards in other adjacent regions.
Boundary Description
See the narrative boundary description of the petitioned-for
viticultural area in the proposed regulatory text published at the end
of this notice.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required maps, and we list them below
in the proposed regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. If we establish this proposed viticultural area, its
name, ``Outer Coastal Plain,'' will be recognized under 27 CFR
4.39(i)(3) as a name of viticultural significance. The text of the new
regulation would clarify this point. Consequently, wine bottlers using
``Outer Coastal Plain'' in a brand name, including a trademark, or in
another label reference as to the origin of the wine, will have to
ensure that the product is eligible to use the viticultural area's name
as an appellation of origin. On the other hand, we do not believe that
any single part of the proposed viticultural area name standing alone
would have viticultural significance if the new area is established.
Accordingly, the proposed part 9 regulatory text set forth in this
document specifies only the full ``Outer Coastal Plain'' name as a term
of viticultural significance for purposes of part 4 of the TTB
regulations.
For a wine to be eligible to use as an appellation of origin a
viticultural area name or other term specified as being viticulturally
significant in part 9 of the TTB regulations, at least 85 percent of
the wine must be derived from grapes grown within the area represented
by that name or other term, and the wine must meet the other conditions
listed in 27 CFR 4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not eligible to use the
viticultural area name or other term as an appellation of origin and
that name or term appears in the brand name, then the label is not in
compliance and the bottler must change the brand name and obtain
approval of a new label. Similarly, if the viticultural area name or
other term appears in another reference on the label in a misleading
manner, the bottler would have to obtain approval of a new label.
Accordingly, if a new label or a previously approved label uses the
name ``Outer Coastal Plain'' for a wine that does not meet the 85
percent standard, the new label will not be approved, and the
previously approved label will be subject to revocation, upon the
effective date of the approval of the Outer Coastal Plain viticultural
area.
Different rules apply if a wine has a brand name containing a
viticultural area name that was used as a brand name on a label
approved before July 7, 1986. See 27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
Public Participation
Comments Invited
We invite comments from interested members of the public on whether
we should establish the proposed viticultural area. We are also
interested in receiving comments on the sufficiency and accuracy of the
name, boundary, climatic, and other required information submitted in
support of the petition. Please provide any available specific
information in support of your comments.
Because of the potential impact of the establishment of the
proposed Outer Coastal Plain viticultural area on brand labels that
include the words ``Outer Coastal Plain'' as discussed above under
``Impact on Current Wine Labels,'' we are particularly interested in
comments regarding whether there will be a conflict between the
proposed area name and currently used brand names. If a commenter
believes that a conflict will arise, the comment should describe the
nature of that conflict, including any negative economic impact that
approval of the proposed viticultural area will have on an existing
viticultural enterprise. We are also interested in receiving
suggestions for ways to avoid any conflicts, for example by adopting a
modified or different name for the viticultural area.
In addition, TTB is interested in comments regarding the
noninclusion within the proposed viticultural area of areas within
other States that are part of the Atlantic Coastal Plain and that may
therefore also have a claim to use of the name ``Outer Coastal Plain,''
including information on any wine grape-growing in those areas. In this
regard, we invite comments on whether the name ``New Jersey Outer
Coastal Plain'' would more appropriately identify the proposed
viticultural area. Comments in this regard should include documentation
or other information supporting the conclusion that use of ``New Jersey
Outer Coastal Plain'' rather than only ``Outer Coastal Plain'' on a
wine label would better enable consumers and vintners to attribute to
the wine in question the quality, reputation, or other characteristic
of wine made from grapes grown in the proposed viticultural area.
Submitting Comments
Please submit your comments by the closing date shown above in this
notice. Your comments must include this notice number and your name and
mailing address. Your comments must be legible and written in language
acceptable for public disclosure. We do not acknowledge receipt of
comments, and we consider all comments to be originals. You may submit
comments in one of five ways:
Mail: You may send written comments to TTB at the address
listed in the ADDRESSES section.
Facsimile: You may submit comments by facsimile
transmission to 202-927-8525. Faxed comments must--
(1) Be on 8.5- by 11-inch paper;
(2) Contain a legible, written signature; and
(3) Be no more than five pages long. This limitation assures
electronic access to our equipment. We will not accept faxed comments
that exceed five pages.
[[Page 37873]]
E-mail: You may e-mail comments to nprm@ttb.gov. Comments
transmitted by electronic mail must--
(1) Contain your e-mail address;
(2) Reference this notice number on the subject line; and
(3) Be legible when printed on 8.5- by 11-inch paper.
Online form: We provide a comment form with the online
copy of this notice on our Web site at https://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/
rules/index.htm. Select the ``Send comments via e-mail'' link under
this notice number.
Federal e-rulemaking portal: To submit comments to us via
the Federal e-rulemaking portal, visit https://www.regulations.gov and
follow the instructions for submitting comments.
You may also write to the Administrator before the comment closing
date to ask for a public hearing. The Administrator reserves the right
to determine whether to hold a public hearing.
Confidentiality
All submitted material is part of the public record and subject to
disclosure. Do not enclose any material in your comments that you
consider to be confidential or inappropriate for public disclosure.
Public Disclosure
You may view copies of this notice, the petition, the appropriate
maps, and any comments we receive by appointment at the TTB Information
Resource Center at 1310 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220. You may
also obtain copies at 20 cents per 8.5- x 11- inch page. Contact our
information specialist at the above address or by telephone at 202-927-
2400 to schedule an appointment or to request copies of comments.
We will post this notice and any comments we receive on this
proposal on the TTB Web site. All name and address information
submitted with the comments will be posted, including e-mail addresses.
We may omit voluminous attachments or material that we consider
unsuitable for posting. In all cases, the full comment will be
available in the TTB Information Resource Center. To access the online
copy of this notice and the submitted comments, visit https://
www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm. Select the ``View Comments'' link
under this notice number to view the posted comments.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that this proposed regulation, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The proposed regulation imposes no new reporting,
recordkeeping, or other administrative requirement. Any benefit derived
from the use of a viticultural area name would be the result of a
proprietor's efforts and consumer acceptance of wines from that area.
Therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action as
defined by Executive Order 12866, 58 FR 51735. Therefore, it requires
no regulatory assessment.
Drafting Information
Jennifer Berry and Linda Chapman of the Regulations and Rulings
Division drafted this notice.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
Proposed Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, we propose to amend 27
CFR, chapter 1, part 9, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
2. Amend subpart C by adding Sec. 9.---- to read as follows:
Sec. 9.---- Outer Coastal Plain.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this
section is ``Outer Coastal Plain''. For purposes of part 4 of this
chapter, ``Outer Coastal Plain'' is a term of viticultural
significance.
(b) Approved maps. The appropriate maps for determining the
boundary of the Outer Coastal Plain viticultural area are seven United
States Geological Survey topographic maps. They are titled--
(1) Wilmington, Delaware-New Jersey-Pennsylvania-Maryland, 1984,
1:100,000 scale;
(2) Hammonton, New Jersey, 1984, 1:100,000 scale;
(3) Trenton, New Jersey-Pennsylvania-New York, 1986, 1:100,000
scale;
(4) Long Branch, New Jersey, 1954, photorevised 1981, 1:24,000
scale;
(5) Atlantic City, New Jersey, 1984, 1:100,000 scale;
(6) Cape May, New Jersey, 1981, 1:100,000 scale; and
(7) Dover, Delaware-New Jersey-Maryland, 1984, 1:100,000 scale.
(c) Boundary. The Outer Coastal Plain viticultural area includes
all of Cumberland, Cape May, Atlantic, and Ocean Counties and portions
of Salem, Gloucester, Camden, Burlington, and Monmouth Counties in the
State of New Jersey. The boundary of the Outer Coastal Plain
viticultural area is as described below.
(1) The beginning point is on the Wilmington map at the confluence
of Alloway Creek with the Delaware River (within Mad Horse Creek State
Wildlife Management Area) in Salem County;
(2) From the beginning point, proceed northeasterly in a straight
line to the village of Hagerville; then
(3) Continue north on an unnamed road locally known as County Road
(CR) 658 to its intersection with State Route (SR) 49; then
(4) Proceed northwesterly on SR 49 to its intersection with SR 45
in the center of the town of Salem; then
(5) Proceed northeasterly on SR 45 to its intersection with SR 540
at the village of Pointers; then
(6) Proceed north on SR 540 into the village of Slapes Corner; then
(7) In Slapes Corner, proceed northeasterly on an unnamed road
locally known as CR 646 to its intersection with the New Jersey
Turnpike near the village of Auburn; then
(8) Proceed northeasterly on the New Jersey Turnpike for
approximately 18 miles to its intersection with SR 47; then
(9) Proceed south on SR 47 for approximately 0.5 mile to its
intersection with SR 534 at the village of Gardenville Center; then
(10) Proceed southeasterly through Gardenville Center on SR 534 to
its intersection with SR 544; then
(11) Proceed northeasterly on SR 544 to its intersection with SR 73
on the Hammonton map; then
(12) Proceed north-northwesterly on SR 73 to its intersection with
SR 70 in Cropwell; then
(13) Proceed east on SR 70 to its intersection with U.S. 206 in Red
Lion; then
(14) Proceed north on U.S. 206, onto the Trenton map, to the
village of Chambers Corner; then
(15) Proceed northeasterly on an unnamed road locally known as CR
537, through the village of Jobstown; then
(16) Continue northeasterly on CR 537, through the villages of
Smithburg and Freehold, to its intersection with SR 18; then
(17) Proceed easterly on SR 18 to its intersection with the Garden
State Parkway; then
(18) Proceed north on the Garden State Parkway and immediately exit
[[Page 37874]]
onto SR 36 East and onto the Long Branch map; then
(19) Using the Long Branch map, continue east on SR 36 to where it
intersects with Joline Avenue; then
(20) Proceed northeasterly on Joline Avenue to the Atlantic Ocean
shoreline; then
(21) Follow the Atlantic Ocean shoreline south, encompassing all
coastal islands, onto the Trenton, Hammonton, Atlantic City, and Cape
May maps, to the city of Cape May; then
(22) Proceed west, then north, along the eastern bank of the
Delaware River, onto the Atlantic City, Dover, and Wilmington maps to
the beginning point.
Signed: June 26, 2006.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6-10384 Filed 6-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P