Honey from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results of New Shipper Review, 37904-37905 [E6-10376]

Download as PDF 37904 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Notices Notification The Department will notify U.S. Customs and Border Protection that bonding is no longer permitted to fulfill security requirements for shipments by Jiangsu JOM, Shanghai Sunbeauty, and Wentai of freshwater crawfish tail meat from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption in the United States on or after the publication of this rescission notice in the Federal Register, and that a cash deposit of 223.01 percent ad valorem should be collected for any entries exported by Jiangsu JOM, Shanghai Sunbeauty, and Wentai. This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO material or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanctions. We are issuing and publishing this determination and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: June 23, 2006. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6–10375 Filed 6–30–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration (A–570–822, A–583–820) Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers from the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the International Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’) that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on certain helical spring lock washers from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) and Taiwan would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is publishing notice of continuation of these antidumping duty orders. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:12 Jun 30, 2006 Jkt 208001 EFFECTIVE DATE: July 3, 2006. Jim Nunno, AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0783. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Background On January 3, 2006, the Department initiated and the ITC instituted sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on certain helical spring lock washers from the PRC and Taiwan pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). 1 As a result of its reviews, the Department found that revocation of the antidumping duty orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail were the orders to be revoked.2 On June 20, 2006, the ITC published its determination that, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, revocation of the antidumping duty orders on certain helical spring lock washers from the PRC and Taiwan would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.3 Scope of the Orders The products covered by both antidumping duty orders are certain helical spring lock washers of carbon steel, of carbon alloy steel, or of stainless steel, heat–treated or non–heattreated, plated or non–plated, with ends that are off–line. Certain helical spring lock washers are designed to: (1) function as a spring to compensate for developed looseness between the component parts of a fastened assembly; (2) distribute the load over a larger area for screws or bolts; and (3) provide a hardened bearing surface. The scope does not include internal or external tooth washers, nor does it include spring lock washers made of other metals, such as copper. Certain helical spring lock washers subject to these orders are currently 1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 70 FR 91 (January 3, 2006); and Helical Spring Lock Washers From China and Taiwan, Investigations Nos. 731-TA-624 and 625 (Second Review), 71 FR 133 (January 3, 2006). 2 See Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers from the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 71 FR 27227 (May 10, 2006). 3 See Helical Spring Lock Washers From China and Taiwan, Investigation Nos. 701-TA-624 and 625 (Second Review), 71 FR 35449 (June 20, 2006). PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 classifiable under subheading 7318.21.0030 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this proceeding is dispositive. On September 30, 1997, the Department determined that certain helical spring lock washers which are imported into the United States in an uncut, coil form are within the scope of the orders. See Notice of Scope Rulings, 62 FR 62288 (November 21, 1997). Determination As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC that revocation of these antidumping duty orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of the antidumping duty orders on certain helical spring lock washers from the PRC and Taiwan. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect antidumping duty cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of continuation of these orders will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this Notice of Continuation. Pursuant to sections 751(c)(2) and 751(c)(6)(A) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-year reviews of these orders not later than June 2011. These five-year (sunset) reviews and this notice are in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act. Dated: June 27, 2006. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6–10382 Filed 6–30–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration (A–570–863) Honey from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results of New Shipper Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: July 3, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen Kramer or Patrick Edwards, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 7, Import AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM 03JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Notices Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0405 or (202) 482– 8029, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On January 25, 2006, the Department initiated new shipper reviews of honey from the People’s Republic of China in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). See Honey from the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of New Shipper Antidumping Duty Review, 71 FR 5051 (January 31, 2006). The reviews were initiated based on timely requests received from Inner Mongolia Altin Bee–Keeping Co., Ltd., Dongtai Peak Honey Industry Co., Ltd., Qinhuangdao Municipal Dafeng Industrial Co., Ltd., and Tianjin Eulia Honey Co. Ltd, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(c). The preliminary results are currently due no later than July 24, 2006. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act requires the Department to issue the preliminary results of a new shipper review within 180 days after the date on which the new shipper review was initiated. The Department may, however, extend the deadline for completion of the preliminary results of a new shipper review to 300 days if it determines that the case is extraordinarily complicated. See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2). The Department has determined that it is not practicable to complete this review within the current time limit due to complex issues in the case and the late verification schedule. Accordingly, the Department is extending the time limit for the completion of the preliminary results until November 21, 2006, which is the first business day 300 days from the date on which this new shipper review was initiated, in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2). The final results, in turn, will be due 90 days after the date of issuance of the preliminary results, unless extended. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: June 21, 2006. Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6–10376 Filed 6–30–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:12 Jun 30, 2006 Jkt 208001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration (A–533–810) Notice of Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Stainless Steel Bar from India Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On March 7, 2006, the Department of Commerce published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar from India. The period of review is February 1, 2004, through January 31, 2005. This review covers sales of stainless steel bar from India with respect to Chandan Steel, Ltd. We provided interested parties with an opportunity to comment on the preliminary results of this review, but received no comments. The final results do not differ from the preliminary results of this review. We will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess antidumping duties on the subject merchandise exported by this company. AGENCY: EFFECTIVE DATE: July 3, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Holland, AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1279. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Since the publication of the preliminary results of this review (see Stainless Steel Bar from India: Notice of Preliminary Results and Preliminary Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR 11390 (March 7, 2006) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’)), the following events have occurred: the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) invited interested parties to comment on the preliminary results of this review. No comments were received. Scope of the Order Merchandise covered by the order is shipments of stainless steel bar (‘‘SSB’’). SSB means articles of stainless steel in straight lengths that have been either hot–rolled, forged, turned, cold–drawn, cold–rolled or otherwise cold–finished, or ground, having a uniform solid cross section along their whole length in the shape of circles, segments of circles, PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 37905 ovals, rectangles (including squares), triangles, hexagons, octagons, or other convex polygons. SSB includes cold– finished SSBs that are turned or ground in straight lengths, whether produced from hot–rolled bar or from straightened and cut rod or wire, and reinforcing bars that have indentations, ribs, grooves, or other deformations produced during the rolling process. Except as specified above, the term does not include stainless steel semi– finished products, cut–to-length flat– rolled products (i.e., cut–to-length rolled products which if less than 4.75 mm in thickness have a width measuring at least 10 times the thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in thickness having a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures at least twice the thickness), wire (i.e., cold–formed products in coils, of any uniform solid cross section along their whole length, which do not conform to the definition of flat–rolled products), and angles, shapes, and sections. The SSB subject to these reviews is currently classifiable under subheadings 7222.11.00.05, 7222.11.00.50, 7222.19.00.05, 7222.19.00.50, 7222.20.00.05, 7222.20.00.45, 7222.20.00.75, and 7222.30.00.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. On May 23, 2005, the Department issued a final scope ruling that SSB manufactured in the United Arab Emirates out of stainless steel wire rod from India is not subject to the scope of this proceeding. See Memorandum to Barbara E. Tillman, Antidumping Duty Orders on Stainless Steel Bar from India and Stainless Steel Wire Rod from India: Final Scope Ruling (May 23, 2005). The ruling is on file in the Central Records Unit, Room B–099 of the main Department building (‘‘CRU’’). Period of Review The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is February 1, 2004, through January 31, 2005. Partial Rescission of Review According to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the Department will rescind an administrative review in whole or only with respect to a particular exporter or producer, if we conclude that, during the POR, there were no entries, exports, or sales of the subject merchandise, as the case may be. In the Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily found that Ferro Alloys Corporation, Ltd. (‘‘Facor’’) reported no entries of E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM 03JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 127 (Monday, July 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37904-37905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10376]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

(A-570-863)


Honey from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Extension of 
Time Limit for the Preliminary Results of New Shipper Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 3, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen Kramer or Patrick Edwards, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 7, Import

[[Page 37905]]

Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 
20230; telephone: (202) 482-0405 or (202) 482-8029, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On January 25, 2006, the Department initiated new shipper reviews 
of honey from the People's Republic of China in accordance with section 
751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). See Honey 
from the People's Republic of China: Initiation of New Shipper 
Antidumping Duty Review, 71 FR 5051 (January 31, 2006). The reviews 
were initiated based on timely requests received from Inner Mongolia 
Altin Bee-Keeping Co., Ltd., Dongtai Peak Honey Industry Co., Ltd., 
Qinhuangdao Municipal Dafeng Industrial Co., Ltd., and Tianjin Eulia 
Honey Co. Ltd, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(c). The preliminary 
results are currently due no later than July 24, 2006.

Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results

    Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act requires the Department to 
issue the preliminary results of a new shipper review within 180 days 
after the date on which the new shipper review was initiated. The 
Department may, however, extend the deadline for completion of the 
preliminary results of a new shipper review to 300 days if it 
determines that the case is extraordinarily complicated. See section 
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2).
    The Department has determined that it is not practicable to 
complete this review within the current time limit due to complex 
issues in the case and the late verification schedule. Accordingly, the 
Department is extending the time limit for the completion of the 
preliminary results until November 21, 2006, which is the first 
business day 300 days from the date on which this new shipper review 
was initiated, in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act 
and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2). The final results, in turn, will be due 90 
days after the date of issuance of the preliminary results, unless 
extended.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: June 21, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-10376 Filed 6-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.