Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain, 36359-36360 [E6-10034]
Download as PDF
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 122 / Monday, June 26, 2006 / Notices
issues under review and on remedy, the
public interest, and bonding.
On May 17, 2006, SigmaTel filed a
motion to strike portions of Actions’
initial brief concerning the issues under
review or in the alternative for an
extension of two days to respond. On
May 19, 2006, Actions filed an
opposition to SigmaTel’s motion to
strike. Also on May 19, 2006, the
Chairman of the Commission granted
the motion for the two-day extension,
thus rendering the motion to strike
moot.
On May 24, 2006, all parties filed
responses to the initial briefs concerning
the issues under review and on remedy,
the public interest, and bonding.
Having examined the record of this
investigation, including the ALJ’s final
ID and the submissions of the parties,
the Commission has (1) determined to
reverse the ALJ’s construction of the
claim phrase ‘‘produce the system clock
control signal and power supply control
signal based on a processing transfer
characteristic of the computation
engine’’ and provide as its own
construction that both the system clock
control signal and the power supply
control signal are required to be
produced during operation of the
integrated circuit such that the voltage
and the frequency of the integrated
circuit are adjusted based on a
processing transfer characteristic, but
that the processing transfer
characteristic is not determined in any
particular manner; (2) determined to
remand this investigation in part to the
ALJ for the purpose of determining
whether the accused products utilizing
the version 952436 firmware infringe
the ’522 patent under the Commission’s
claim construction; (3) determined with
respect to the accused products that do
not use the version 952436 firmware,
that the ALJ made sufficient findings to
find infringement of the asserted claims
of the ’522 patent under our claim
construction, and to adopt his findings
with respect to those products; (4)
determined that SigmaTel’s 35XX
products satisfy the technical prong of
the domestic industry requirement with
regard to the ’522 patent under the
Commission’s claim construction; (5)
determined to delete the term
‘‘firmware’’ from the ALJ’s construction
of the claim term ‘‘memory’’ in claim 13
of the ’187 patent; (6) determined to
defer addressing issues relating to
remedy, public interest, and bonding,
for both the ’187 patent and the ’522
patent until after the ALJ issues his
initial determination on remand
regarding the ’522 patent; and (7)
determined to extend the target date in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:00 Jun 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
the investigation until September 15,
2006.
Further, the Commission has
determined not to consider Actions’
discussion in its submissions on the
issues under review with respect to the
’187 patent because this discussion is
outside the scope of the Commission’s
review.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and in sections 210.45 and 210.51 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.45, 210.51).
Issued: June 19, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–9972 Filed 6–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–309–A–B and
731–TA–696 (Second Review)]
Pure and Alloy Magnesium From
Canada and Pure Magnesium From
China
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the
Act), that revocation of the
countervailing duty orders on pure and
alloy magnesium from Canada would
not be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
With respect to China, revocation of
the antidumping duty order on pure
magnesium would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the Untied
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.
Background
With respect to Canada, the
Commission instituted the reviews on
July 1, 2005 (70 FR 38199) and
determined on October 4, 2005 that it
would conduct full reviews (70 FR
60108, October 14, 2005). With respect
to China, the Commission instituted the
review on September 1, 2005 (70 FR
52122) and determined on December 5,
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
2005 that it would conduct a full review
(70 FR 75483, December 20, 2005).
Notice of the scheduling of the
Commission’s reviews and of a public
hearing to be held in connection
therewith was given by posting copies
of the notice in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, Washington, DC, and by
publishing the notice in the Federal
Register on January 12, 2006 (71 FR
2065). The hearing was held in
Washington, DC, on April 25, 2006, and
all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these reviews to the
Secretary of Commerce on June 26,
2006. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 3859
(June 2006), entitled Pure and Alloy
Magnesium from Canada and Pure
Magnesium from China: Investigation
Nos. 701–TA–309–A–B and 731–TA–696
(Second Review).
Issued: June 21, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06–5668 Filed 6–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–M
Determinations
PO 00000
36359
Sfmt 4703
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–678, 679, 681,
and 682 (Second Review)]
Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India,
Japan, and Spain
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of full five-year
reviews concerning the antidumping
duty orders on stainless steel bar from
Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of full reviews
pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5))
(the Act) to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on stainless steel bar from Brazil,
India, Japan, and Spain would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury within a reasonably
foreseeable time. For further
information concerning the conduct of
these reviews and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: June 20, 2006.
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
36360
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 122 / Monday, June 26, 2006 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher J. Cassise (202–708–5408),
Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. On June 5, 2006, the
Commission determined that responses
to its notice of institution of the subject
five-year reviews were such that full
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of
the Act should proceed (71 FR 34391,
June 14, 2006). A record of the
Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy,
and any individual Commissioner’s
statements are available from the Office
of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
Participation in the reviews and
public service list. Persons, including
industrial users of the subject
merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in these reviews as parties
must file an entry of appearance with
the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11 of the
Commission’s rules, by 45 days after
publication of this notice. A party that
filed a notice of appearance following
publication of the Commission’s notice
of institution of the reviews need not
file an additional notice of appearance.
The Secretary will maintain a public
service list containing the names and
addresses of all persons, or their
representatives, who are parties to the
reviews.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and BPI service list. Pursuant to section
207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the
Secretary will make BPI gathered in
these reviews available to authorized
applicants under the APO issued in the
reviews, provided that the application is
made by 45 days after publication of
this notice. Authorized applicants must
represent interested parties, as defined
by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:00 Jun 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
the reviews. A party granted access to
BPI following publication of the
Commission’s notice of institution of
the reviews need not reapply for such
access. A separate service list will be
maintained by the Secretary for those
parties authorized to receive BPI under
the APO.
Staff report. The prehearing staff
report in the reviews will be placed in
the nonpublic record on September 19,
2006, and a public version will be
issued thereafter, pursuant to section
207.64 of the Commission’s rules.
Hearing. The Commission will hold a
hearing in connection with the reviews
beginning at 9:30 a.m. on October 12,
2006, at the U.S. International Trade
Commission Building. Requests to
appear at the hearing should be filed in
writing with the Secretary to the
Commission on or before October 5,
2006. A nonparty who has testimony
that may aid the Commission’s
deliberations may request permission to
present a short statement at the hearing.
All parties and nonparties desiring to
appear at the hearing and make oral
presentations should attend a
prehearing conference to be held at 9:30
a.m. on October 6, 2006, at the U.S.
International Trade Commission
Building. Oral testimony and written
materials to be submitted at the public
hearing are governed by sections
201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24, and
207.66 of the Commission’s rules.
Parties must submit any request to
present a portion of their hearing
testimony in camera no later than 7
business days prior to the date of the
hearing.
Written submissions. Each party to the
reviews may submit a prehearing brief
to the Commission. Prehearing briefs
must conform with the provisions of
section 207.65 of the Commission’s
rules; the deadline for filing is
September 29, 2006. Parties may also
file written testimony in connection
with their presentation at the hearing, as
provided in section 207.24 of the
Commission’s rules, and posthearing
briefs, which must conform with the
provisions of section 207.67 of the
Commission’s rules. The deadline for
filing posthearing briefs is October 23,
2006; witness testimony must be filed
no later than three days before the
hearing. In addition, any person who
has not entered an appearance as a party
to the reviews may submit a written
statement of information pertinent to
the subject of the reviews on or before
October 23, 2006. On November 21,
2006, the Commission will make
available to parties all information on
which they have not had an opportunity
to comment. Parties may submit final
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
comments on this information on or
before November 27, 2006, but such
final comments must not contain new
factual information and must otherwise
comply with section 207.68 of the
Commission’s rules. All written
submissions must conform with the
provisions of section 201.8 of the
Commission’s rules; any submissions
that contain BPI must also conform with
the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s rules do not
authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic
means, except to the extent permitted by
section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules,
as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8,
2002). Even where electronic filing of a
document is permitted, certain
documents must also be filed in paper
form, as specified in II(C) of the
Commission’s Handbook on Electronic
Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173
(November 8, 2002).
Additional written submissions to the
Commission, including requests
pursuant to section 201.12 of the
Commission’s rules, shall not be
accepted unless good cause is shown for
accepting such submissions, or unless
the submission is pursuant to a specific
request by a Commissioner or
Commission staff.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules,
each document filed by a party to the
reviews must be served on all other
parties to the reviews (as identified by
either the public or BPI service list), and
a certificate of service must be timely
filed. The Secretary will not accept a
document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the
Commission’s rules.
Issued: June 20, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–10034 Filed 6–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested
60-Day Notice of Information
Collection Under Review: Annual
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 122 (Monday, June 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36359-36360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10034]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-678, 679, 681, and 682 (Second Review)]
Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of full five-year reviews concerning the antidumping
duty orders on stainless steel bar from Brazil, India, Japan, and
Spain.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on stainless steel bar from Brazil, India,
Japan, and Spain would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence
of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further
information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of
general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part
207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: June 20, 2006.
[[Page 36360]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher J. Cassise (202-708-5408),
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these
reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at
https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. On June 5, 2006, the Commission determined that
responses to its notice of institution of the subject five-year reviews
were such that full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act
should proceed (71 FR 34391, June 14, 2006). A record of the
Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner's statements are available from the Office of
the Secretary and at the Commission's Web site.
Participation in the reviews and public service list. Persons,
including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the
merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer
organizations, wishing to participate in these reviews as parties must
file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11 of the Commission's rules, by 45 days after
publication of this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance
following publication of the Commission's notice of institution of the
reviews need not file an additional notice of appearance. The Secretary
will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses
of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the
reviews.
Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under
an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list. Pursuant
to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary will make
BPI gathered in these reviews available to authorized applicants under
the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the application is made by
45 days after publication of this notice. Authorized applicants must
represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are
parties to the reviews. A party granted access to BPI following
publication of the Commission's notice of institution of the reviews
need not reapply for such access. A separate service list will be
maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI
under the APO.
Staff report. The prehearing staff report in the reviews will be
placed in the nonpublic record on September 19, 2006, and a public
version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of the
Commission's rules.
Hearing. The Commission will hold a hearing in connection with the
reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on October 12, 2006, at the U.S.
International Trade Commission Building. Requests to appear at the
hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission
on or before October 5, 2006. A nonparty who has testimony that may aid
the Commission's deliberations may request permission to present a
short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties desiring to
appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should attend a
prehearing conference to be held at 9:30 a.m. on October 6, 2006, at
the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Oral testimony and
written materials to be submitted at the public hearing are governed by
sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24, and 207.66 of the Commission's
rules. Parties must submit any request to present a portion of their
hearing testimony in camera no later than 7 business days prior to the
date of the hearing.
Written submissions. Each party to the reviews may submit a
prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with
the provisions of section 207.65 of the Commission's rules; the
deadline for filing is September 29, 2006. Parties may also file
written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing,
as provided in section 207.24 of the Commission's rules, and
posthearing briefs, which must conform with the provisions of section
207.67 of the Commission's rules. The deadline for filing posthearing
briefs is October 23, 2006; witness testimony must be filed no later
than three days before the hearing. In addition, any person who has not
entered an appearance as a party to the reviews may submit a written
statement of information pertinent to the subject of the reviews on or
before October 23, 2006. On November 21, 2006, the Commission will make
available to parties all information on which they have not had an
opportunity to comment. Parties may submit final comments on this
information on or before November 27, 2006, but such final comments
must not contain new factual information and must otherwise comply with
section 207.68 of the Commission's rules. All written submissions must
conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission's rules;
any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the
requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's
rules. The Commission's rules do not authorize filing of submissions
with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the
extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission's rules, as
amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even where electronic filing
of a document is permitted, certain documents must also be filed in
paper form, as specified in II(C) of the Commission's Handbook on
Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002).
Additional written submissions to the Commission, including
requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission's rules, shall
not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such
submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request
by a Commissioner or Commission staff.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission's
rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on
all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or
BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed.
The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a
certificate of service.
Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
Issued: June 20, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-10034 Filed 6-23-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P