Metal Calendar Slides from Japan: Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 36063-36065 [E6-9965]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 121 / Friday, June 23, 2006 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–588–867]
Metal Calendar Slides from Japan:
Notice of Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value and Final
Negative Determination of Critical
Circumstances
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: We determine that metal
calendar slides (MCS) from Japan are
being, or are likely to be, sold in the
United States at less than fair value
(LTFV), as provided in section 735 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act). The estimated margins of sales at
LTFV are shown in the ‘‘Final
Determination’’ section of this notice.’’
Moreover, we determine that critical
circumstances do not exist with regard
to certain exports of subject
merchandise from Japan. See the
‘‘Critical Circumstances’’ section below.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 23, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dara
Iserson or Scott Lindsay, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 6, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4052 and (202)
482–0780, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Background
On January 25, 2006, the Department
of Commerce (the Department) issued
its preliminary determination of sales at
LTFV of MCS from Japan. See
Preliminary Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value: Metal Calendar
Slides from Japan, 71 FR 5244 (February
1, 2006) (Preliminary Determination). In
the Preliminary Determination, the
Department stated that it would issue its
preliminary finding with respect to
Stuebing Automatic Machine
Company’s (Petitioner) critical
circumstances allegation within 30
days. On February 21, 2006, the
Department issued its negative
preliminary determination regarding
critical circumstances in this
investigation. See Preliminary Negative
Determination of Critical
Circumstances: Metal Calendar Slides
from Japan, 71 FR 9779 (February 27,
2006). In response to our January 13,
2006 supplemental questionnaire,
Nishiyama Kinzoku Co., Ltd.
(Respondent) submitted, on January 27,
2006, revised versions of its cost of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
production and constructed value
databases that included production
information regarding its MCS sales
during the period of investigation (POI).
On February 1, 2006, Respondent
filed, pursuant to section 351.224(c)(2)
of the Department’s regulations, a timely
allegation that the Department made
ministerial errors in the Preliminary
Determination. Petitioner neither
alleged any ministerial errors nor filed
response comments. On February 24,
2006, the Department issued a
memorandum stating that, because the
errors were not significant pursuant to
sections 351.224(c) and (g) of the
Department’s regulations, it would not
correct the ministerial errors until the
final determination. See Memorandum
from the Team, to Barbara E. Tillman,
Director for Office of AD/CVD
Enforcement 6, ‘‘Allegations of
Ministerial Errors in the Preliminary
Determination,’’ (Ministerial Error
Memorandum).
On February 13, 2006, Respondent
requested that the Department postpone
the final determination and extend
provisional measures in this
investigation. We postponed the final
determination to June 16, 2006, under
section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and
section 351.210(b)(2)(ii) of Department’s
regulations. See Notice of Postponement
of Final Determination and Extension of
Provisional Measures in the
Antidumping Duty Investigation of
Metal Calendar Slides from Japan, 71
FR 13091 (March 14, 2006).
The Department conducted sales and
cost verifications from February 13,
2006 through February 17, 2006, and
from February 20, 2006 through
February 24, 2006, respectively. See
Verification of the Sales Response of
Nishiyama Kinzoku Co., Ltd. in the
Antidumping Duty Investigation of
Metal Calendar Slides from Japan,
(March 24, 2006) (Sales Verification
Report); and Verification of the Cost of
Production and Constructed Value Date
Submitted by Nishiyama Kinzoku Co.,
Ltd. in the Antidumping Duty
Investigation of Metal Calendar Slides
from Japan, (April 14, 2006) (Cost
Verification Report).
On April 6, 2006, the Department met
with Petitioner on model matching
issues. See Memorandum from Dara
Iserson to the File Antidumping Duty
Investigation of Calendar Metal Slides
from Japan, dated April 6, 2006. On
April 18, 2006, Petitioner submitted
comments regarding modification of the
model matching criteria. On April 26,
2006, we received rebuttal comments
from Respondent regarding this issue.
On May 1, 2006, Petitioner and
Respondent filed their case briefs. On
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36063
May 8, 2006, the Department received a
rebuttal brief from Respondent.
Petitioner did not submit a rebuttal
brief. On May 25, 2006, Respondent
submitted a database containing the
reallocated home market bank charges,
as they had been reported in its
February 10, 2006, response.
Period of Investigation
The POI is April 1, 2004, through
March 31, 2005.
Scope of Investigation
For the purpose of this investigation,
the products covered are metal calendar
slides (MCS). The products covered in
this investigation are ‘‘V’’ and/or ‘‘U’’
shaped MCS manufactured from cold–
rolled steel sheets, whether or not left in
black form, tin plated or finished as tin
free steel (TFS), typically with a
thickness from 0.19 mm to 0.23 mm,
typically in lengths from 152 mm to 915
mm, typically in widths from 12 mm to
29 mm when the slide is lying flat and
before the angle is pressed into the slide
(although they are not typically shipped
in this ‘‘flat’’ form), that are typically
either primed to protect the outside of
the slide against oxidization or coated
with a colored enamel or lacquer for
decorative purposes, whether or not
stacked, and excluding paper and
plastic slides. MCS are typically
provided with either a plastic attached
hanger or eyelet to hang and bind
calendars, posters, maps or charts, or
the hanger can be stamped from the
metal body of the slide itself. These
MCS are believed to be classified under
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) subheading
7326.90.1000 (Other articles of iron and
steel: Forged or stamped; but not further
worked: Other: Of tinplate). This
HTSUS number is provided for
convenience and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) purposes. The
written description of the scope of this
investigation is dispositive.
Verification
As provided in section 782(i) of the
Act, we verified the information
submitted by Respondent for use in this
final determination. We used standard
verification procedures including
examination of relevant accounting and
production records, and original source
documents provided by Respondent.
See Sales Verification Report and Cost
Verification Report.
Critical Circumstances
On February 21, 2006, we issued our
preliminary finding that critical
circumstances did not exist for
Respondent. See Notice of Preliminary
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
36064
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 121 / Friday, June 23, 2006 / Notices
Negative Determination of Critical
Circumstances: Metal Calendar Slides
From Japan (February 27, 2006). We
received comments on our critical
circumstances determination from
Petitioner and Respondent. See
Memorandum from Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, to David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, ‘‘Metal Calendar Slides
from Japan: Final Determination of
Sales at Less–than-Fair Value’’ (Issues
and Decisions Memorandum), dated
concurrently with this notice.
Section 735(a)(3) of the Act provides
that the Department will determine that
critical circumstances exist if: (A)(i)
There is a history of dumping and
material injury by reason of dumped
imports in the United States or
elsewhere of the subject merchandise; or
(ii) the person by whom, or for whose
account, the merchandise was imported
knew or should have known that the
exporter was selling the subject
merchandise at less than its fair value
and that there would to be material
injury by reason of such sales; and (B)
there have been massive imports of the
subject merchandise over a relatively
short period.
We determine that critical
circumstances do not exist for imports
of subject merchandise because, there is
no history of dumping of this product in
the United States or elsewhere (See
memorandum to the file dated June 16,
2006); and the calculated final margin
for Nishiyama’s EP sales and for ‘‘all
other’’ exporters is less than the 25
percent knowledge threshold. Therefore,
we determine that critical circumstances
do not exist for imports of subject
merchandise because, as required
section 735(a)(3)(A) of the Act, there is
no evidence that importers knew, or
should have known, that the exporter
was selling subject merchandise at
LTFV.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Analysis of Comments Received
Decisions Memorandum are identical in
content.
Changes Since the Preliminary
Determination
Based on our findings at verification
and on our analysis of the comments
received, we have made certain
adjustments to the margin calculations
used in the Preliminary Determination.
These adjustments are discussed in
detail in several memoranda. See
Memorandum From Scott Lindsay,
Senior Analyst, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 6 and Dara Iserson, Analyst, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 6 through:
Thomas Gilgunn, Program Manager,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 6 to the
File, ‘‘Final Analysis Memorandum for
Metal Calendar Slides from Japan:
Nishiyama Kinzoku Co., Ltd.’’ (June 16,
2006) (Final Calculation Memorandum);
Memorandum from Ernest Z. Gziryan,
Senior Accountant, through Taija A.
Slaughter, Program Manager, to Neal M.
Halper, Director, Office of Accounting,
‘‘Cost of Production and Constructed
Value Calculation Adjustments for the
Final Determination - Nishiyama
Kinzoku Co., Ltd.’’ (June 16, 2006) (Cost
Calculation Memorandum); and Issues
and Decisions Memorandum.
Final Determination
We determine that the following
weighted–average dumping margins
exist for the period April 1, 2004,
through March 31, 2005:
Manufacturer/Exporter
Weighted–Average
Margin (Percent)
Nishiyama Kinzoku Co.,
Ltd. ............................
All Others ......................
3.02%
3.02%
Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation
Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B) of the
Act, we will instruct U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) to continue to
suspend liquidation of all entries of
MCS from Japan that are entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after February 1,
2006, the date of publication of the
Preliminary Determination in the
Federal Register. We will instruct CBP
to continue to require, for each entry, a
cash deposit or the posting of a bond
equal to the weighted–average dumping
margins indicated above. These
instructions suspending liquidation will
remain in effect until further notice.
All issues raised in the comments
submitted by interested parties are
listed in the Appendix to this notice and
are addressed in the Issues and
Decisions Memorandum, which is
hereby adopted by this notice. Parties
can find a complete discussion of the
issues raised in this investigation in this
public memorandum, which is on file in
the Central Records Unit, B–099 of the
main Commerce Building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decisions Memorandum can be accessed International Trade Commission
Notification
directly on the Internet at: https://
In accordance with section 735(d) of
ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/. The paper copy and
the Act, we have notified the U.S.
the electronic version of the Issues and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
International Trade Commission (ITC) of
our determination. As our final
determination is affirmative, the ITC
will determine, within 45 days, whether
these imports materially injure, or
threaten material injury to, an industry
in the United States, pursuant to section
735(b)(2)(B) of the Act. If the ITC
determines that material injury, or
threat of injury does not exist, the
proceeding will be terminated and all
securities posted will be refunded or
canceled. If the ITC determines that
such injury does exist, the Department
will issue an antidumping duty order
directing CBP officials to assess
antidumping duties on all imports of the
subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the effective
date of the suspension of liquidation.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with section 351.305(a)(3) of the
Department’s regulations. Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with sections
735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 16, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix
List of Issues Covered in the Issues and
Decisions Memorandum
Comment 1: Changing Model Matching
Criteria and Opportunity to Comment
Comment 2: Analysis of Model
Matching Criteria
Comment 3: Average Sales Periods
Comment 4: Date of Sale
Comment 5: Post–Sale Price
Adjustments
Comment 6: Critical Circumstances
Comment 7: Inventory Carry Costs
Comment 8: Adjustment to Cost of Sales
Denominator for Overvaluation of
Material Cost
Comment 9: Adjustment to Total Costs
for Unreconciled Difference
Comment 10: Adjustment to Cost of
Sales Denominator for Purchased Goods
Comment 11: Miscellaneous Losses
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 121 / Friday, June 23, 2006 / Notices
Comment 12: Adjustment to Steel Costs
[FR Doc. E6–9965 Filed 6–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Hydrographic Services Review Panel
membership Solicitation
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of membership
solicitation for Hydrographic Services
Review panel (HSRP); supplementary
information.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice is to solicit
candidates needed to replace voting
members of the HSRP for the remainder
of calendar year 2006, and supplements
a notice published on January 12, 2006,
to obtain candidates to replace five of
the voting members of the HSRP whose
appointments expire in 2006.
Individuals who have submitted
resumes in response to the January 12,
2006, notice do not need to submit
resumes again. Individuals who have
not submitted resumes in response to
the January 12, 2006, notice may submit
resumes at any time during the calendar
year. Decisions on HSRP membership
can be made at any time during the
calendar year, and resumes will not be
considered unless they are received ten
days before each decision date.
The Hydrographic Services
Improvement Act Amendments of 2002,
Public Law 107–372, requires the Under
Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and
Atmosphere to solicit nominations for
membership on the HSRP. The HSRP
advises the Under Secretary on matters
related to section 303 of the
Hydrographic Services Improvement
Act of 1998, (the Act) and other
appropriate matters the Under Secretary
refers to the HSRP for review and
advice.
Resumes should be sent to the
address, e-mail, or fax specified and
may be submitted at any time during the
calendar year.
ADDRESSES: Director, Office of Coast
survey, National Ocean Service, NOAA
(N/CS), 1315 East West Highway, Silver
Spring, MD 20910, fax: 301–713–4019,
e-mail: Hydroservices.panel@noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Captain Steven Barnum, Director, Office
of Coast Survey, NOS/NOAA, 301–713–
2770 x134, fax 301–713–4019, e-mail:
steven.barnum@noaa.gov.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
Under 33
U.S.C. 883a, et seq., NOAA’s National
Ocean Service (NOS) is responsible for
providing nautical charts and related
information for safe navigation. NOS
collects and compiles hydrographic,
tidal and current, geodetic, and a variety
of other data in order to fulfill this
responsibility. The HSRP provides
advice on topics such as ‘‘NOAA’s
Hydrographic Survey Priorities,’’
technologies relating to operations,
research and development, and
dissemination of data pertaining to:
(a) Hydrographic surveying;
(b) Nautical charting;
(c) Water level measurements;
(d) Current measurements;
(e) Geodetic measurements; and
(f) Geospaital measurements.
The HSRP comprises fifteen voting
members appointed by the Under
Secretary in accordance with Section
105 of the Act. Members are selected on
a standardized basis, in accordance with
applicable Department of Commerce
guidance. The voting members of the
HSRP are individuals who, by reason of
knowledge, experience, or training, are
especially qualified in one or more
disciplines relating to hydropgraphic
surveying, tides, currents, geodetic and
geospatial measurements, marine
transportation, port administration,
vessel pilotage, and coastal and fishery
management. An individual may not be
appointed as a voting member of the
HSRP if the individual is a full-time
officer or employee of the United States.
Any voting member of the HSRP who is
an applicant for, or beneficiary of, (as
determined by the Under Secretary) any
assistance under the Act shall disclose
to the HSRP that relationship, and may
not vote on any matter pertaining to that
assistance.
Voting members of the HSRP serve for
a term of four years. Members serve at
the discretion of the Under Secretary
and are subject to government ethics
standards. Any individual appointed to
a partial or full term may be reappointed
for one additional full term. A voting
member may serve until his or her
successor has taken office. The HSRP
selects one voting member to serve as
the Chair and another to serve as the
Vice Chair. The Vice Chair acts as Chair
in the absence or incapacity of the Chair
but will not automatically become the
Chair if the Chair resigns.
At the minimum, meetings occur
biannually, and at the call of the Chair
or upon the request of a majority of the
voting members or of the Under
Secretary. Voting members receive
compensation at a rate established by
the Under Secretary, not to exceed the
maximum daily rate payable under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36065
section 5376 of title 5, United States
Code, when actually engaged in the
performance of duties for such Panel
and shall be reimbursed for actual and
reasonable expenses incurred in the
performance of such duties.
Dated: June 16, 2006.
Steven Barnum,
NOAA, Director, Office of Coast Survey,
National Ocean Service, National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 06–5633 Filed 6–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–JE–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
[Docket No. PTO–T–2006–0013]
Request for Comments on Removal of
Paper Search Collection of Marks That
Include Design Elements
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (‘‘USPTO’’) requests
comments on a modified plan to remove
the paper search collection of marks that
include design elements from the
USPTO’s Trademark Search Facility and
replace them with electronic
documents. The USPTO has determined
that the paper search collection is no
longer necessary due to the availability
and reliability of the USPTO’s electronic
search system.
DATES: Comments must be received by
August 22, 2006 to ensure
consideration. No public hearing will be
held.
ADDRESSES: The Office prefers that
comments be submitted by electronic
mail message to
TMSearchComments@uspto.gov.
Written comments may also be
submitted by mail to the Commissioner
for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1451, attention
Mary Hannon; by hand delivery to the
Trademark Assistance Center,
Concourse Level, James Madison
Building, East Wing, 600 Dulany Street,
Alexandria, Virginia, marked to the
attention of Mary Hannon; or by
electronic mail message via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. See the Federal
eRulemaking Portal Web site (https://
www.regulations.gov) for additional
instructions on providing comments via
the Federal eRulemaking Portal.
The comments will be available for
public inspection on the Office’s Web
site at https://www.uspto.gov and in the
Office of the Commissioner for
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 121 (Friday, June 23, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36063-36065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-9965]
[[Page 36063]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-588-867]
Metal Calendar Slides from Japan: Notice of Final Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Negative Determination of
Critical Circumstances
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: We determine that metal calendar slides (MCS) from Japan are
being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair
value (LTFV), as provided in section 735 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). The estimated margins of sales at LTFV are shown in
the ``Final Determination'' section of this notice.'' Moreover, we
determine that critical circumstances do not exist with regard to
certain exports of subject merchandise from Japan. See the ``Critical
Circumstances'' section below.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 23, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dara Iserson or Scott Lindsay, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4052 and (202) 482-0780, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 25, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
issued its preliminary determination of sales at LTFV of MCS from
Japan. See Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Metal Calendar Slides from Japan, 71 FR 5244 (February 1, 2006)
(Preliminary Determination). In the Preliminary Determination, the
Department stated that it would issue its preliminary finding with
respect to Stuebing Automatic Machine Company's (Petitioner) critical
circumstances allegation within 30 days. On February 21, 2006, the
Department issued its negative preliminary determination regarding
critical circumstances in this investigation. See Preliminary Negative
Determination of Critical Circumstances: Metal Calendar Slides from
Japan, 71 FR 9779 (February 27, 2006). In response to our January 13,
2006 supplemental questionnaire, Nishiyama Kinzoku Co., Ltd.
(Respondent) submitted, on January 27, 2006, revised versions of its
cost of production and constructed value databases that included
production information regarding its MCS sales during the period of
investigation (POI).
On February 1, 2006, Respondent filed, pursuant to section
351.224(c)(2) of the Department's regulations, a timely allegation that
the Department made ministerial errors in the Preliminary
Determination. Petitioner neither alleged any ministerial errors nor
filed response comments. On February 24, 2006, the Department issued a
memorandum stating that, because the errors were not significant
pursuant to sections 351.224(c) and (g) of the Department's
regulations, it would not correct the ministerial errors until the
final determination. See Memorandum from the Team, to Barbara E.
Tillman, Director for Office of AD/CVD Enforcement 6, ``Allegations of
Ministerial Errors in the Preliminary Determination,'' (Ministerial
Error Memorandum).
On February 13, 2006, Respondent requested that the Department
postpone the final determination and extend provisional measures in
this investigation. We postponed the final determination to June 16,
2006, under section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and section
351.210(b)(2)(ii) of Department's regulations. See Notice of
Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional
Measures in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Metal Calendar Slides
from Japan, 71 FR 13091 (March 14, 2006).
The Department conducted sales and cost verifications from February
13, 2006 through February 17, 2006, and from February 20, 2006 through
February 24, 2006, respectively. See Verification of the Sales Response
of Nishiyama Kinzoku Co., Ltd. in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of
Metal Calendar Slides from Japan, (March 24, 2006) (Sales Verification
Report); and Verification of the Cost of Production and Constructed
Value Date Submitted by Nishiyama Kinzoku Co., Ltd. in the Antidumping
Duty Investigation of Metal Calendar Slides from Japan, (April 14,
2006) (Cost Verification Report).
On April 6, 2006, the Department met with Petitioner on model
matching issues. See Memorandum from Dara Iserson to the File
Antidumping Duty Investigation of Calendar Metal Slides from Japan,
dated April 6, 2006. On April 18, 2006, Petitioner submitted comments
regarding modification of the model matching criteria. On April 26,
2006, we received rebuttal comments from Respondent regarding this
issue. On May 1, 2006, Petitioner and Respondent filed their case
briefs. On May 8, 2006, the Department received a rebuttal brief from
Respondent. Petitioner did not submit a rebuttal brief. On May 25,
2006, Respondent submitted a database containing the reallocated home
market bank charges, as they had been reported in its February 10,
2006, response.
Period of Investigation
The POI is April 1, 2004, through March 31, 2005.
Scope of Investigation
For the purpose of this investigation, the products covered are
metal calendar slides (MCS). The products covered in this investigation
are ``V'' and/or ``U'' shaped MCS manufactured from cold-rolled steel
sheets, whether or not left in black form, tin plated or finished as
tin free steel (TFS), typically with a thickness from 0.19 mm to 0.23
mm, typically in lengths from 152 mm to 915 mm, typically in widths
from 12 mm to 29 mm when the slide is lying flat and before the angle
is pressed into the slide (although they are not typically shipped in
this ``flat'' form), that are typically either primed to protect the
outside of the slide against oxidization or coated with a colored
enamel or lacquer for decorative purposes, whether or not stacked, and
excluding paper and plastic slides. MCS are typically provided with
either a plastic attached hanger or eyelet to hang and bind calendars,
posters, maps or charts, or the hanger can be stamped from the metal
body of the slide itself. These MCS are believed to be classified under
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading
7326.90.1000 (Other articles of iron and steel: Forged or stamped; but
not further worked: Other: Of tinplate). This HTSUS number is provided
for convenience and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) purposes.
The written description of the scope of this investigation is
dispositive.
Verification
As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, we verified the
information submitted by Respondent for use in this final
determination. We used standard verification procedures including
examination of relevant accounting and production records, and original
source documents provided by Respondent. See Sales Verification Report
and Cost Verification Report.
Critical Circumstances
On February 21, 2006, we issued our preliminary finding that
critical circumstances did not exist for Respondent. See Notice of
Preliminary
[[Page 36064]]
Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances: Metal Calendar Slides
From Japan (February 27, 2006). We received comments on our critical
circumstances determination from Petitioner and Respondent. See
Memorandum from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, to David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, ``Metal Calendar Slides from Japan: Final
Determination of Sales at Less-than-Fair Value'' (Issues and Decisions
Memorandum), dated concurrently with this notice.
Section 735(a)(3) of the Act provides that the Department will
determine that critical circumstances exist if: (A)(i) There is a
history of dumping and material injury by reason of dumped imports in
the United States or elsewhere of the subject merchandise; or (ii) the
person by whom, or for whose account, the merchandise was imported knew
or should have known that the exporter was selling the subject
merchandise at less than its fair value and that there would to be
material injury by reason of such sales; and (B) there have been
massive imports of the subject merchandise over a relatively short
period.
We determine that critical circumstances do not exist for imports
of subject merchandise because, there is no history of dumping of this
product in the United States or elsewhere (See memorandum to the file
dated June 16, 2006); and the calculated final margin for Nishiyama's
EP sales and for ``all other'' exporters is less than the 25 percent
knowledge threshold. Therefore, we determine that critical
circumstances do not exist for imports of subject merchandise because,
as required section 735(a)(3)(A) of the Act, there is no evidence that
importers knew, or should have known, that the exporter was selling
subject merchandise at LTFV.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the comments submitted by interested parties
are listed in the Appendix to this notice and are addressed in the
Issues and Decisions Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this
notice. Parties can find a complete discussion of the issues raised in
this investigation in this public memorandum, which is on file in the
Central Records Unit, B-099 of the main Commerce Building. In addition,
a complete version of the Issues and Decisions Memorandum can be
accessed directly on the Internet at: https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/. The
paper copy and the electronic version of the Issues and Decisions
Memorandum are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
Based on our findings at verification and on our analysis of the
comments received, we have made certain adjustments to the margin
calculations used in the Preliminary Determination. These adjustments
are discussed in detail in several memoranda. See Memorandum From Scott
Lindsay, Senior Analyst, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6 and Dara Iserson,
Analyst, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6 through: Thomas Gilgunn, Program
Manager, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6 to the File, ``Final Analysis
Memorandum for Metal Calendar Slides from Japan: Nishiyama Kinzoku Co.,
Ltd.'' (June 16, 2006) (Final Calculation Memorandum); Memorandum from
Ernest Z. Gziryan, Senior Accountant, through Taija A. Slaughter,
Program Manager, to Neal M. Halper, Director, Office of Accounting,
``Cost of Production and Constructed Value Calculation Adjustments for
the Final Determination - Nishiyama Kinzoku Co., Ltd.'' (June 16, 2006)
(Cost Calculation Memorandum); and Issues and Decisions Memorandum.
Final Determination
We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins
exist for the period April 1, 2004, through March 31, 2005:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-Average
Manufacturer/Exporter Margin (Percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nishiyama Kinzoku Co., Ltd.......................... 3.02%
All Others.......................................... 3.02%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation
Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend liquidation
of all entries of MCS from Japan that are entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after February 1, 2006, the date of
publication of the Preliminary Determination in the Federal Register.
We will instruct CBP to continue to require, for each entry, a cash
deposit or the posting of a bond equal to the weighted-average dumping
margins indicated above. These instructions suspending liquidation will
remain in effect until further notice.
International Trade Commission Notification
In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we have notified the
U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of our determination. As our
final determination is affirmative, the ITC will determine, within 45
days, whether these imports materially injure, or threaten material
injury to, an industry in the United States, pursuant to section
735(b)(2)(B) of the Act. If the ITC determines that material injury, or
threat of injury does not exist, the proceeding will be terminated and
all securities posted will be refunded or canceled. If the ITC
determines that such injury does exist, the Department will issue an
antidumping duty order directing CBP officials to assess antidumping
duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the
suspension of liquidation.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with section 351.305(a)(3) of the Department's
regulations. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 16, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix
List of Issues Covered in the Issues and Decisions Memorandum
Comment 1: Changing Model Matching Criteria and Opportunity to Comment
Comment 2: Analysis of Model Matching Criteria
Comment 3: Average Sales Periods
Comment 4: Date of Sale
Comment 5: Post-Sale Price Adjustments
Comment 6: Critical Circumstances
Comment 7: Inventory Carry Costs
Comment 8: Adjustment to Cost of Sales Denominator for Overvaluation of
Material Cost
Comment 9: Adjustment to Total Costs for Unreconciled Difference
Comment 10: Adjustment to Cost of Sales Denominator for Purchased Goods
Comment 11: Miscellaneous Losses
[[Page 36065]]
Comment 12: Adjustment to Steel Costs
[FR Doc. E6-9965 Filed 6-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S