Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to Fee for Extension of Time Requests, 35720-35721 [E6-9691]
Download as PDF
35720
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 21, 2006 / Notices
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–9692 Filed 6–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–CBOE–2006–48 on the subject
line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–53982; File No. SR–NASD–
2006–063]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change and Amendment No. 1
Thereto Relating to Fee for Extension
of Time Requests
June 14, 2006.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
• Send paper comments in triplicate
notice is hereby given that on May 15,
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
2006, the National Association of
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
20549–1090.
the proposed rule change as described
All submissions should refer to File
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
Number SR–CBOE–2006–48. This file
have been prepared by NASD. On May
number should be included on the
25, 2006, NASD filed Amendment No.
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
1 to the proposed rule change.3 NASD
Commission process and review your
has designated this proposal as one
comments more efficiently, please use
establishing or changing a due, fee, or
only one method. The Commission will
other charge under section
post all comments on the Commission’s 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 4 and Rule 19b–
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
4(f)(2) thereunder,5 which renders the
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
proposal effective upon filing with
submission, all subsequent
Commission. The Commission is
amendments, all written statements
publishing this notice to solicit
with respect to the proposed rule
comments on the proposed rule change,
change that are filed with the
as amended, from interested persons.
Commission, and all written
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
communications relating to the
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than the Proposed Rule Change
those that may be withheld from the
NASD is proposing to amend Section
public in accordance with the
8 of Schedule A to NASD’s By-Laws to
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
increase the service charge for
available for inspection and copying in
processing extension requests to $4.00
the Commission’s Public Reference
per request. Below is the text of the
Room. Copies of such filing also will be proposed rule change. Proposed new
available for inspection and copying at
language is in italics; proposed
the principal office of the Exchange. All deletions are in brackets.
comments received will be posted
*
*
*
*
*
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
15 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
information from submissions. You
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
should submit only information that
3 In Amendment No. 1, NASD made nonyou wish to make available publicly. All
substantive changes to the discussion of the
submissions should refer to File
purpose of the proposed rule filing.
Number SR–CBOE–2006–48 and should
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
be submitted on or before July 12, 2006.
5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Paper Comments
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Jun 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SCHEDULE A TO NASD BY-LAWS
*
*
*
*
*
Section 8—Service Charge for
Processing Extension of Time Requests
(a) No Change.
(b) The service charge for processing
each initial extension of time request
and for all subsequent extension of time
requests (1) involving the same
transaction under Regulation T and/or
(2) involving an extension of time
previously granted pursuant to SEC
Rule 15c3–3(n) shall be [$2.00;
provided, however, that the service
charge shall be $1.00 for extension of
time requests filed electronically by
members using NASD’s Automated
Regulatory Reporting System]$4.00 per
request.
*
*
*
*
*
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
NASD included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. NASD has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Regulation T, issued by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (‘‘FRB’’) pursuant to the Act,
among other things, governs the
extension of credit to customers by
broker-dealers for purchasing
securities.6 Rule 15c3–3 under the Act
governs, among other things, the time
period in which broker-dealers must
complete sell orders on behalf of
customers.7 Under SEC Rule 15c3–3(n),
a self-regulatory organization (‘‘SRO’’)
may grant a broker-dealer an extension
of time for delivery on sales of securities
6 12 CFR 220.4(c) and 220.8(d). Regulation T
generally requires that customers with a cash
account pay for securities within five business days
of purchase; for customers with a margin account,
there must be sufficient minimum margin (typically
50%) to support the purchase.
7 17 CFR 240.15c3–3. In particular, Rule 15c3–
3(m) requires a broker-dealer that executes a
customer sell order to obtain possession of the
securities within ten business days of the settlement
date or to close the transaction by purchasing the
securities.
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 21, 2006 / Notices
if: (1) It is satisfied that the brokerdealer is acting in good faith in making
the application; and (2) exceptional
circumstances warrant such action.
Regulation T has a similar standard to
allow an extension of time for payment
for purchases of securities.8
NASD proposes to amend Section 8 of
Schedule A to NASD’s By-Laws to
increase the service charge for
processing each extension of time
request pursuant to the provisions of
Regulation T and Rule 15c3–3 from $2
(or $1 in the case of electronically filed
extension of time requests) to $4 for all
manually or electronically filed
extension of time requests. NASD
believes that the proposed fees align
with the actual costs associated with
reviewing, processing, recording and
responding to such requests. The NYSE
similarly increased the fee it charges for
extension requests to $4.00 per
extension.9
NASD has filed the proposed rule
change for immediate effectiveness. The
new fee shall be implemented on July 1,
2006.
2. Statutory Basis
NASD believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the provisions
of section 15A(b)(5) of the Act,10 which
requires, among other things, that
NASD’s rules provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among members and
issuers and other persons using any
facility or system that NASD operates or
controls. NASD believes that the rule
change reflects NASD’s increased costs
in reviewing, processing and
administering the extensions of time
requests.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
NASD does not believe that the
proposed rule change will result in any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
8 Under Regulation T, a firm’s examining
authority may grant an extension unless the
examining authority believes that the broker-dealer
is not acting in good faith or that the broker-dealer
has not sufficiently determined that exceptional
circumstances warrant such action. See supra note
6.
9 See Exchange Act Release No. 53235 (February
6, 2006), 71 FR 7820 (February 14, 2006) (SR–
NYSE–2005–92) (Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to Increasing
Certain Fees Charged by the NYSE to Its Members
and Member Organizations).
10 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(5).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Jun 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing with the Commission
pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act 11 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2)
thereunder,12 because it establishes or
changes a due, fee, or other charge
imposed by NASD. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears
to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.13
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NASD–2006–063 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASD–2006–063. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
11 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
13 The effective date of the original proposed rule
change is May 15, 2006, and the effective date for
Amendment No. 1 is May 25, 2006. For purposes
of calculating the 60-day period within which the
Commission may summarily abrogate the proposed
rule change, as amended, under section 19(b)(3)(C)
of the Act, the Commission considers the period to
commence on May 25, 2006, the date on which
NASD submitted Amendment No. 1. See 15 U.S.C.
78s(b)(3)(A).
12 17
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35721
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of NASD.
All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASD–2006–063 and
should be submitted on or before July
12, 2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–9691 Filed 6–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–53994; File No. SR–NASD–
2006–071]
Self-Regulatory Organizations:
National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Technical
Amendments to Rule 3210
June 15, 2006.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’)1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 2,
2006, the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by NASD. NASD
has designated the proposed rule change
as constituting a ‘‘non-controversial’’
rule change under paragraph (f)(6) of
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35720-35721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-9691]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-53982; File No. SR-NASD-2006-063]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to Fee for Extension
of Time Requests
June 14, 2006.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 15, 2006, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(``NASD'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC''
or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by NASD. On May 25,
2006, NASD filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\3\ NASD
has designated this proposal as one establishing or changing a due,
fee, or other charge under section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \4\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\5\ which renders the proposal effective
upon filing with Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice
to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ In Amendment No. 1, NASD made non-substantive changes to the
discussion of the purpose of the proposed rule filing.
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
NASD is proposing to amend Section 8 of Schedule A to NASD's By-
Laws to increase the service charge for processing extension requests
to $4.00 per request. Below is the text of the proposed rule change.
Proposed new language is in italics; proposed deletions are in
brackets.
* * * * *
SCHEDULE A TO NASD BY-LAWS
* * * * *
Section 8--Service Charge for Processing Extension of Time Requests
(a) No Change.
(b) The service charge for processing each initial extension of
time request and for all subsequent extension of time requests (1)
involving the same transaction under Regulation T and/or (2) involving
an extension of time previously granted pursuant to SEC Rule 15c3-3(n)
shall be [$2.00; provided, however, that the service charge shall be
$1.00 for extension of time requests filed electronically by members
using NASD's Automated Regulatory Reporting System]$4.00 per request.
* * * * *
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, NASD included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Regulation T, issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (``FRB'') pursuant to the Act, among other things,
governs the extension of credit to customers by broker-dealers for
purchasing securities.\6\ Rule 15c3-3 under the Act governs, among
other things, the time period in which broker-dealers must complete
sell orders on behalf of customers.\7\ Under SEC Rule 15c3-3(n), a
self-regulatory organization (``SRO'') may grant a broker-dealer an
extension of time for delivery on sales of securities
[[Page 35721]]
if: (1) It is satisfied that the broker-dealer is acting in good faith
in making the application; and (2) exceptional circumstances warrant
such action. Regulation T has a similar standard to allow an extension
of time for payment for purchases of securities.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 12 CFR 220.4(c) and 220.8(d). Regulation T generally
requires that customers with a cash account pay for securities
within five business days of purchase; for customers with a margin
account, there must be sufficient minimum margin (typically 50%) to
support the purchase.
\7\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-3. In particular, Rule 15c3-3(m) requires a
broker-dealer that executes a customer sell order to obtain
possession of the securities within ten business days of the
settlement date or to close the transaction by purchasing the
securities.
\8\ Under Regulation T, a firm's examining authority may grant
an extension unless the examining authority believes that the
broker-dealer is not acting in good faith or that the broker-dealer
has not sufficiently determined that exceptional circumstances
warrant such action. See supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NASD proposes to amend Section 8 of Schedule A to NASD's By-Laws to
increase the service charge for processing each extension of time
request pursuant to the provisions of Regulation T and Rule 15c3-3 from
$2 (or $1 in the case of electronically filed extension of time
requests) to $4 for all manually or electronically filed extension of
time requests. NASD believes that the proposed fees align with the
actual costs associated with reviewing, processing, recording and
responding to such requests. The NYSE similarly increased the fee it
charges for extension requests to $4.00 per extension.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Exchange Act Release No. 53235 (February 6, 2006), 71 FR
7820 (February 14, 2006) (SR-NYSE-2005-92) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No.
1 Thereto Relating to Increasing Certain Fees Charged by the NYSE to
Its Members and Member Organizations).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NASD has filed the proposed rule change for immediate
effectiveness. The new fee shall be implemented on July 1, 2006.
2. Statutory Basis
NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of section 15A(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ which requires, among
other things, that NASD's rules provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and issuers and
other persons using any facility or system that NASD operates or
controls. NASD believes that the rule change reflects NASD's increased
costs in reviewing, processing and administering the extensions of time
requests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing with the
Commission pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\12\ because it establishes or changes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by NASD. At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
\13\ The effective date of the original proposed rule change is
May 15, 2006, and the effective date for Amendment No. 1 is May 25,
2006. For purposes of calculating the 60-day period within which the
Commission may summarily abrogate the proposed rule change, as
amended, under section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission
considers the period to commence on May 25, 2006, the date on which
NASD submitted Amendment No. 1. See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NASD-2006-063 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2006-063. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of NASD.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2006-063
and should be submitted on or before July 12, 2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-9691 Filed 6-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P