In the Matter of Certain Lighters; Notice of Investigation, 35450-35451 [E6-9671]
Download as PDF
35450
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 20, 2006 / Notices
it would conduct expedited reviews (71
FR 23946). Notice of the scheduling of
the Commission’s reviews was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register on April 25, 2006 (71
FR 23946).
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these reviews to the
Secretary of Commerce on June 15,
2006. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 3858
(June 2006), entitled Helical Spring
Lock Washers from China and Taiwan
(Inv. Nos. 731–TA–624 and 625 (Second
Review)).
Issued: June 15, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–9675 Filed 6–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2006).
[Inv. No. 337–TA–575]
In the Matter of Certain Lighters;
Notice of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on May
16, 2006, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, on behalf of Zippo Manufacturing
Co., Inc. of Bradford, Pennsylvania and
ZippMark, Inc. of Wilmington,
Delaware. A supplement to the
complaint was filed on June 5, 2006.
The complaint, as supplemented,
alleges violations of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain lighters by reason of
infringement of U.S. Trademark
Registration No. 2,606,241. The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
general exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:31 Jun 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas S. Fusco, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205–2571.
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
June 14, 2006, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(C) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain lighters by reason
of infringement of U.S. Trademark
Registration No. 2,606,241, and whether
an industry in the United States exists
as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are—
Zippo Manufacturing Co., Inc., 33
Barbour Street, Bradford, PA 16701.
ZippMark, Inc., 103 Springer Building,
Silverside Road, Wilmington, DE
19810.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Tung Fong International Promotion Co.,
Ltd, Unit C9–21/F., Wah Lok
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Industrial Ctr., 31–41 Shan Mei St., Fo
Tan, N.T., Kln., Hong Kong.
Wenzhou Star Smoking Set Co., Ltd.
(aka Wenzhou Hengxing Smoking Set
Co., Ltd.), Shuangboa Road, Ouhai
Economic Development Area,
Wenzhou, China.
Taizhou Rongshi Lighter Development
Co., Ltd., (aka Rongshi Enterprise),
Chayu Industrial Zone, Zeguo
Wenling, Zhejiang, China.
Wenzhou Tailier Smoking Set Co., Ltd.
(aka Wenzhou Tailier Smoking Set
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.), No. 58
Zhugong Road, JinZhu Industrial
Zone, Wenzhou, China 325000.
beWild.com, 2357 Bedford Avenue,
Bellmore, NY 11710.
Kalan LP (dba Kalan Trendsetting Gifts
& Novelties), 97 S. Union Avenue,
Lansdowne, PA 19050.
Vista Wholesale, 1010 Meadow Lane,
Greencastle, IN 46135.
(c) The Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation, is
Thomas S. Fusco, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Charles E. Bullock is
designated as the presiding
administrative law judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a
timely response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondents, to find the facts to be
as alleged in the complaint and this
notice and to enter an initial
determination and a final determination
containing such findings, and may
result in the issuance of a limited
exclusion order or cease and desist
order or both directed against the
respondent.
By order of the Commission.
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 20, 2006 / Notices
Issued: June 15, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–9671 Filed 6–19–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Submission for OMB Review:
Comment Request
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
June 7, 2006.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1094 (Final)]
In the Matter of Metal Calendar Slides
From Japan; Notice of Commission
Determination not To Conduct a
Portion of the Hearing In Camera
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
AGENCY:
Commission determination not
to close any part of the hearing to the
public.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commission has
determined to deny the request of
respondent Nishiyama Kinzoku Ltd. Co.
(‘‘Nishiyama’’) to conduct a portion of
its hearing in the above-captioned
investigation scheduled for June 22,
2006, in camera. See Commission rules
201.13 and 201.36(b)(4) (19 CFR 201.13
and 201.36(b)(4)).
Karl
von Schriltz, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, telephone 202–205–3096.
Hearing-impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter
may be obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The
Commission believes it should conduct
its business in public in all but the most
unusual circumstances. The
Commission has determined that, in
light of the nature of this investigation,
it will be able to assess adequately all
arguments raised by Nishiyama without
resorting to the extraordinary measure
of an in camera hearing. Accordingly,
the Commission has determined that the
public interest would be best served by
a hearing that is entirely open to the
public. See 19 CFR 201.36(c)(1).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Authority: This notice is provided
pursuant to Commission Rule 201.35(b) (19
CFR 201.35(b)).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 15, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–9676 Filed 6–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:14 Jun 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
The Department of Labor (DOL) has
submitted the following public
information collection request (ICR) to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,
44 U.S.C. chapter 35). A copy of this
ICR, with applicable supporting
documentation, may be obtained by
contacting Darrin King on 202–693–
4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or
e-mail: king.darrin@dol.gov.
Comments should be sent to Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, 202–395–7316
(this is not a toll-free number), within
30 days from the date of this publication
in the Federal Register.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Occupational Safety and
Health Administration.
Type of Review: Extension of
currently approved collection.
Title: 1,3-Butadiene (29 CFR
1910.1051).
OMB Number: 1218–0170.
Frequency: On occasion.
Type of Response: Recordkeeping and
Third party disclosure.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit; Federal Government; and State,
Local, or Tribal Government.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35451
Number of Respondents: 115.
Number of Annual Responses: 3,532.
Estimated Time per Response: Time
per response ranges from 15 seconds
(.004 hour) to write the date and time on
each new cartridge label to 2 hours to
complete a referral medical
examination.
Total Burden Hours: 956.
Total Annualized capital/startup
costs: $0.
Total Annual Costs (operating/
maintaining systems or purchasing
services): $90,552.
Description: The 1,3-Butadiene
Standard requires employers to monitor
employee exposure to 1,3-Butadiene;
develop and maintain compliance and
exposure-goal programs if employee
exposures to 1,3-Butadiene are above
the Standard’s permissible exposure
limits or action level; label respirator
filter elements to indicate the date and
time it is first installed on the respirator;
establish medical surveillance programs
to monitor employee health, and to
provide employees with information
about their exposures and the health
effects of exposure to 1,3Butadiene.
Ira L. Mills,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–9604 Filed 6–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment Standards Administration
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. Currently, the
Employment Standards Administration
is soliciting comments concerning the
proposed collection: Uniform Billing
Form (OWCP–92). A copy of the
proposed information collection request
can be obtained by contacting the office
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35450-35451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-9671]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-575]
In the Matter of Certain Lighters; Notice of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on May 16, 2006, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Zippo Manufacturing Co., Inc. of Bradford, Pennsylvania and ZippMark,
Inc. of Wilmington, Delaware. A supplement to the complaint was filed
on June 5, 2006. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain lighters by reason of infringement of U.S. Trademark
Registration No. 2,606,241. The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2)
of section 337.
The complainants request that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a general exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas S. Fusco, Esq., Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205-2571.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2006).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on June 14, 2006, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain lighters by
reason of infringement of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,606,241,
and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainants are--
Zippo Manufacturing Co., Inc., 33 Barbour Street, Bradford, PA 16701.
ZippMark, Inc., 103 Springer Building, Silverside Road, Wilmington, DE
19810.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Tung Fong International Promotion Co., Ltd, Unit C9-21/F., Wah Lok
Industrial Ctr., 31-41 Shan Mei St., Fo Tan, N.T., Kln., Hong Kong.
Wenzhou Star Smoking Set Co., Ltd. (aka Wenzhou Hengxing Smoking Set
Co., Ltd.), Shuangboa Road, Ouhai Economic Development Area, Wenzhou,
China.
Taizhou Rongshi Lighter Development Co., Ltd., (aka Rongshi
Enterprise), Chayu Industrial Zone, Zeguo Wenling, Zhejiang, China.
Wenzhou Tailier Smoking Set Co., Ltd. (aka Wenzhou Tailier Smoking Set
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.), No. 58 Zhugong Road, JinZhu Industrial Zone,
Wenzhou, China 325000.
beWild.com, 2357 Bedford Avenue, Bellmore, NY 11710.
Kalan LP (dba Kalan Trendsetting Gifts & Novelties), 97 S. Union
Avenue, Lansdowne, PA 19050.
Vista Wholesale, 1010 Meadow Lane, Greencastle, IN 46135.
(c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this
investigation, is Thomas S. Fusco, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Charles E.
Bullock is designated as the presiding administrative law judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the
respondents, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and
this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final
determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance
of a limited exclusion order or cease and desist order or both directed
against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
[[Page 35451]]
Issued: June 15, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-9671 Filed 6-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P