Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 33487-33489 [E6-9024]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 111 / Friday, June 9, 2006 / Notices
represent a significant portion of subject
firm’s business. In addition, the subject
firm would have to produce a
component part of the product that was
the basis for the customers’ certification.
A search of the TAA database
revealed that, for the relevant period,
none of the subject firm’s major
declining customers are TAA certified.
As such, the subject worker group is not
eligible for TAA under secondary
impact.
In order for the Department to issue
a certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA), the worker group
must be certified eligible to apply for
TAA. Since the workers are denied
eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers
cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
Conclusion
After reconsideration, I affirm the
original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance and
alternative trade adjustment assistance
for workers and former workers of
CyTech Hardwood, Inc., Amsterdam,
New York.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of
May 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–9009 Filed 6–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,111]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Eastman Kodak Company; United
States and Canada Finance
Department; Rochester, NY; Dismissal
of Application for Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
Eastman Kodak Company, United States
and Canada Finance Department,
Rochester, New York. The application
did not contain new information
supporting a conclusion that the
determination was erroneous, and also
did not provide a justification for
reconsideration of the determination
that was based on either mistaken facts
or a misinterpretation of facts or of the
law. Therefore, dismissal of the
application was issued.
TA–W–59,111; Eastman Kodak
Company United States and Canada
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:01 Jun 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
Finance Department Rochester,
New York (May 31, 2006)
Signed at Washington, DC, this 1st day of
June 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–9019 Filed 6–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19
U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
periods of May 2006.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
directly-impacted (primary) worker
adjustment assistance to be issued, each
of the group eligibility requirements of
section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign county of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33487
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance as an
adversely affected secondary group to be
issued, each of the group eligibility
requirements of section 222(b) of the
Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied for
the firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
(B) A loss of business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued; the date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of (a)(2)(A)
(increased imports) of section 222 have
been met, and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of
the Trade Act have been met.
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
33488
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 111 / Friday, June 9, 2006 / Notices
TA–W–59,174; Ethox International, Inc.,
Buffalo Mfg. Division, Onsite Leased
Workers of ADECCO, Buffalo, NY:
April 6, 2005.
TA–W–59,196; Kincaid Furniture Co.,
Inc., Plant #1, On-Site Leased
Workers from Foothills Temporary
Employment, Hudson, NC: March
16, 2006.
TA–W–59,196A; Kincaid Furniture Co.,
Inc., Corporate Offices, Hudson,
NC: April 11, 2005.
TA–W–59,238; Nashua Corporation,
Imaging Supplies Coverted Paper
Division, Jefferson City, TN: April
17, 2005.
TA–W–59,311; Paxar Americas, Inc., A
Subsidiary of Paxar Corp., Wover
Division, On-Site Leased Workers of
Manpower, Weston, WV: April 28,
2005.
TA–W–59,320; Artee-Wrap Spun Yarns,
A Division of Culp, Inc., Lincolnton,
NC: May 2, 2005.
TA–W–59,348; Ardisam, Inc.,
Cumberland, WI: May 4, 2005.
TA–W–59,356; Masonite Corporation,
P.O. Box 285, Corning, CA: May 8,
2005.
TA–W–59,368; Formica Corporation,
Rocklin, CA: May 9, 2005.
TA–W–59,139; Whitesell Corporation,
Working On-Site at Electrolux
Home Products, Greenville, MI:
March 13, 2005.
TA–W–59,170; Harris Thomas
Industries, Dayton, OH: April 7,
2005.
TA–W–59,212; Vanguard Furniture Co.,
Inc., On-Site Lease Workers of
Accuforce, Hickory, NC: April 12,
2005.
TA–W–59,254; Layman Lumber
Company, LLC, On-Site Leased
Workers of Act Now, Inc., Naches,
WA: April 19, 2005.
TA–W–59,276; Unifi, Inc., Plant #7,
Mayodan, NC: April 24, 2005.
TA–W–59,200; General Mills, Inc.,
Pillsbury Division, Allentown, PA:
April 12, 2005.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of (a)(2)(B)
(shift in production) of Section 222 and
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–59,096; DJ Orthopedics,
Distribution Center, Vista, CA:
March 21, 2005.
TA–W–59,222; Unilever Supply Chain,
Inc., A Division of Conopco,
Merced, CA: April 14, 2005.
TA–W–59,230; Stolt Sea Farm, A
Subsidiary of Stolt-Nielsen, On-Site
Leased Workers of Hamilton
Connections, Stratford, CT: April
17, 2005.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:01 Jun 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
TA–W–59,293; Invensys Appliance
Controls, North Manchester, IN:
May 29, 2006.
TA–W–59,311A; Paxar Americas, Inc., A
Subsidiary of Paxar Corp., Printed
Division, On-Site Leased Workers of
Foothill, Lenior, NC: September 24,
2005.
TA–W–59,318; F. Schumacher and
Company, dba Vogue Wallcovering,
Fitchburg, MA: May 2, 2005.
TA–W–59,375; Eagle Picher Automotive,
A Subsidiary of Eagle Picher,
Hillsdale Tool Division, Hillsdale,
MI: November 22, 2005.
TA–W–59,375A; Eagle Picher
Automotive, A Subsidiary of Eagle
Picher, Hillsdale Tool Division,
Jonesville, MI: November 22, 2005.
TA–W–59,164; Sun Components, Inc.,
Warsaw, IN: April 3, 2005.
TA–W–59,323; Moore Wallace, Business
Form Design Division, A RR
Donnelly Company, Monroe, WI:
April 28, 2005.
TA–W–59,386; Woodmaster, Inc., St.
Anthony, IN: April 27, 2005.
The following certification has been
issued. The requirement of supplier to
a trade certified firm and section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
None.
The following certification has been
issued. The requirement of downstream
producer to a trade certified firm and
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
None.
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–59,010; Foamex LP, A Subsidiary
of Foamex International, Corry, PA.
TA–W–59,050; Wise Industries, Kings
Mountain, NC.
TA–W–59,197; Collins and Aikman
Products Co., PO Box 208,
Farmville, NC.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (Increased imports
and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (has shifted
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–59,042; Smart Papers, Park Falls,
WI.
The workers firm does not produce an
article as required for certification under
section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA–W–59,137; Harte-Hanks, A
Subsidiary of Harte Hanks Market
Intelligence, Sterling Heights, MI.
TA–W–59,268; Freedom Food Service,
Intier Automotive Seating of
America, A Division of Elliott’s,
Inc., Red Oak, IA.
TA–W–59,270; GC Services, El Paso
Operator Services, El Paso, TX.
TA–W–59,281; Super Hanger Supply
Solutions, Inc., Longwood, FL.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (2) has not been met. The
workers firm (or subdivision) is not a
supplier or downstream producer to
trade-affected companies.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
Affirmative Determinations for
Alternative Trade Ajdustment
Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the criteria
for eligibility have not been met for the
reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that
criterion (a)(2)(A)(I.A) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A)
(no employment decline) has not been
met.
TA–W–59,201; Amphenol T and M
Antennas, A Division of Amphenol
Corp., Vernon Hill, IL.
TA–W–59,227; York Group Metal Casket
Assembly (The), Matthews Casket
Division, A Subsidiary of Matthews
International, Marshfield, MO.
TA–W–59,344; Factory Screenworks,
King, NC.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (shift in production to
a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
The following certifications have been
issued; the date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determinations.
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
section 246(a)(3)(ii) have been met.
I. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
II. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
III. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 111 / Friday, June 9, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
mailed to persons who write to the
above address.
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
section 246(a)(3)(ii) have not been met
for the reasons specified.
Since the workers are denied
eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers
cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
TA–W–59,201; Amphenol T and M
Antennas, A Division of Amphenol
Corp., Vernon Hill, IL.
TA–W–59,227; York Group Metal Casket
Assembly (The), Matthews Casket
Division, A Subsidiary of Matthews
International, Marshfield, MO.
TA–W–59,344; Factory Screenworks,
King, NC.
TA–W–59,010; Foamex LP, A Subsidiary
of Foamex International, Corry, PA.
TA–W–59,050; Wise Industries, Kings
Mountain, NC.
TA–W–59,042; Smart Papers, Park Falls,
WI.
TA–W–59,137; Harte-Hanks, A
Subsidiary of Harte Hanks Market
Intelligence, Sterling Heights, MI.
TA–W–59,268; Freedom Food Service,
Intier Automotive Seating of
America, A Division of Elliott’s,
Inc., Red Oak, IA.
TA–W–59,270; GC Services, El Paso
Operator Services, El Paso, TX.
TA–W–59,281; Super Hanger Supply
Solutions, Inc., Longwood, FL.
The Department has determined that
criterion (1) of section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of
age or older.
None.
The Department has determined that
criterion (2) of section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
TA–W–59,386; Woodmaster, Inc., St.
Anthony, IN.
The Department has determined that
criterion (3) of section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None.
I hereby certify that the fore
mentioned determinations were issued
during the month of May 2006. Copies
of these determinations are available for
inspection in Room C–5311, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210
during normal business hours or will be
Dated: June 1, 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–9024 Filed 6–8–06; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:01 Jun 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
33489
This investigation revealed that the
Highland Park Service Center, MiWorks
did not file this petition. The petition
was filed by a worker who was
employed by Synergy Staffing,
Incorporated. The petition has been
deemed invalid. Consequently, the
investigation has been terminated.
Employment and Training
Administration
Signed in Washington, DC, this 25th day of
May 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–9023 Filed 6–8–06; 8:45 am]
[TA–W–59,046]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
GE Aviation—Engine Services; West
Coast Operations, Ontario Plant #1;
Ontario, CA; Dismissal of Application
for Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
GE Aviation—Engine Services, West
Coast Operations, Ontario Plant #1,
Ontario, California. The application did
not contain new information supporting
a conclusion that the determination was
erroneous, and also did not provide a
justification for reconsideration of the
determination that was based on either
mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal
of the application was issued.
TA–W–59,046; GE Aviation—Engine
Services West Coast Operations,
Ontario Plant #1 Ontario, California
(May 31, 2006)
Signed at Washington, DC, this 1st day of
June 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–9016 Filed 6–8–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,248]
Kimberly-Clark; Lakeview Plant;
Neenah, WI; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, an investigation was
initiated on April 20, 2006 in response
to a petition filed by a company official
and the USW Local 2–482 on behalf of
workers at Kimberly-Clark, Lakeview
Plant, Neenah, Wisconsin.
The petitioners have requested that
the petition be withdrawn.
Consequently, the investigation has
been terminated.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 24th day of
May 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–9022 Filed 6–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,939]
Employment and Training
Administration
Kmart; Rainbow City, AL; Dismissal of
Application for Reconsideration
[TA–W–59,418]
Glomar Steel Company; Synergy
Staffing, Incorporated; Ecorse, MI;
Notice of Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, an investigation was
initiated on May 18, 2006, in response
to a petition filed by the Highland Park
Service Center, MiWorks on behalf of
workers at Glomar Steel
Company\Synergy Staffing,
Incorporated, Ecorse, Michigan.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
Kmart, Rainbow City, Alabama. The
application did not contain new
information supporting a conclusion
that the determination was erroneous,
and also did not provide a justification
for reconsideration of the determination
that was based on either mistaken facts
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 111 (Friday, June 9, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33487-33489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-9024]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents
summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade
adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the periods
of May 2006.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for directly-impacted (primary)
worker adjustment assistance to be issued, each of the group
eligibility requirements of section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign county of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance
as an adversely affected secondary group to be issued, each of the
group eligibility requirements of section 222(b) of the Act must be
met.
(1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers'
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm (or
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued; the date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of section 222 have been met, and section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met.
[[Page 33488]]
TA-W-59,174; Ethox International, Inc., Buffalo Mfg. Division, Onsite
Leased Workers of ADECCO, Buffalo, NY: April 6, 2005.
TA-W-59,196; Kincaid Furniture Co., Inc., Plant #1, On-Site Leased
Workers from Foothills Temporary Employment, Hudson, NC: March 16,
2006.
TA-W-59,196A; Kincaid Furniture Co., Inc., Corporate Offices, Hudson,
NC: April 11, 2005.
TA-W-59,238; Nashua Corporation, Imaging Supplies Coverted Paper
Division, Jefferson City, TN: April 17, 2005.
TA-W-59,311; Paxar Americas, Inc., A Subsidiary of Paxar Corp., Wover
Division, On-Site Leased Workers of Manpower, Weston, WV: April 28,
2005.
TA-W-59,320; Artee-Wrap Spun Yarns, A Division of Culp, Inc.,
Lincolnton, NC: May 2, 2005.
TA-W-59,348; Ardisam, Inc., Cumberland, WI: May 4, 2005.
TA-W-59,356; Masonite Corporation, P.O. Box 285, Corning, CA: May 8,
2005.
TA-W-59,368; Formica Corporation, Rocklin, CA: May 9, 2005.
TA-W-59,139; Whitesell Corporation, Working On-Site at Electrolux Home
Products, Greenville, MI: March 13, 2005.
TA-W-59,170; Harris Thomas Industries, Dayton, OH: April 7, 2005.
TA-W-59,212; Vanguard Furniture Co., Inc., On-Site Lease Workers of
Accuforce, Hickory, NC: April 12, 2005.
TA-W-59,254; Layman Lumber Company, LLC, On-Site Leased Workers of Act
Now, Inc., Naches, WA: April 19, 2005.
TA-W-59,276; Unifi, Inc., Plant #7, Mayodan, NC: April 24, 2005.
TA-W-59,200; General Mills, Inc., Pillsbury Division, Allentown, PA:
April 12, 2005.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of Section 222 and section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-59,096; DJ Orthopedics, Distribution Center, Vista, CA: March 21,
2005.
TA-W-59,222; Unilever Supply Chain, Inc., A Division of Conopco,
Merced, CA: April 14, 2005.
TA-W-59,230; Stolt Sea Farm, A Subsidiary of Stolt-Nielsen, On-Site
Leased Workers of Hamilton Connections, Stratford, CT: April 17, 2005.
TA-W-59,293; Invensys Appliance Controls, North Manchester, IN: May 29,
2006.
TA-W-59,311A; Paxar Americas, Inc., A Subsidiary of Paxar Corp.,
Printed Division, On-Site Leased Workers of Foothill, Lenior, NC:
September 24, 2005.
TA-W-59,318; F. Schumacher and Company, dba Vogue Wallcovering,
Fitchburg, MA: May 2, 2005.
TA-W-59,375; Eagle Picher Automotive, A Subsidiary of Eagle Picher,
Hillsdale Tool Division, Hillsdale, MI: November 22, 2005.
TA-W-59,375A; Eagle Picher Automotive, A Subsidiary of Eagle Picher,
Hillsdale Tool Division, Jonesville, MI: November 22, 2005.
TA-W-59,164; Sun Components, Inc., Warsaw, IN: April 3, 2005.
TA-W-59,323; Moore Wallace, Business Form Design Division, A RR
Donnelly Company, Monroe, WI: April 28, 2005.
TA-W-59,386; Woodmaster, Inc., St. Anthony, IN: April 27, 2005.
The following certification has been issued. The requirement of
supplier to a trade certified firm and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the
Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certification has been issued. The requirement of
downstream producer to a trade certified firm and section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
criteria for eligibility have not been met for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2)(A)(I.A) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A) (no employment decline) has not been met.
TA-W-59,201; Amphenol T and M Antennas, A Division of Amphenol Corp.,
Vernon Hill, IL.
TA-W-59,227; York Group Metal Casket Assembly (The), Matthews Casket
Division, A Subsidiary of Matthews International, Marshfield, MO.
TA-W-59,344; Factory Screenworks, King, NC.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
TA-W-59,010; Foamex LP, A Subsidiary of Foamex International, Corry,
PA.
TA-W-59,050; Wise Industries, Kings Mountain, NC.
TA-W-59,197; Collins and Aikman Products Co., PO Box 208, Farmville,
NC.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (Increased
imports and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (has shifted production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
TA-W-59,042; Smart Papers, Park Falls, WI.
The workers firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA-W-59,137; Harte-Hanks, A Subsidiary of Harte Hanks Market
Intelligence, Sterling Heights, MI.
TA-W-59,268; Freedom Food Service, Intier Automotive Seating of
America, A Division of Elliott's, Inc., Red Oak, IA.
TA-W-59,270; GC Services, El Paso Operator Services, El Paso, TX.
TA-W-59,281; Super Hanger Supply Solutions, Inc., Longwood, FL.
The investigation revealed that criteria (2) has not been met. The
workers firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier or downstream producer
to trade-affected companies.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Alternative Trade Ajdustment Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements
of section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
The following certifications have been issued; the date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determinations.
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of section 246(a)(3)(ii) have been met.
I. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
II. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that
are not easily transferable.
III. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
[[Page 33489]]
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements
of section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of section 246(a)(3)(ii) have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Since the workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
TA-W-59,201; Amphenol T and M Antennas, A Division of Amphenol Corp.,
Vernon Hill, IL.
TA-W-59,227; York Group Metal Casket Assembly (The), Matthews Casket
Division, A Subsidiary of Matthews International, Marshfield, MO.
TA-W-59,344; Factory Screenworks, King, NC.
TA-W-59,010; Foamex LP, A Subsidiary of Foamex International, Corry,
PA.
TA-W-59,050; Wise Industries, Kings Mountain, NC.
TA-W-59,042; Smart Papers, Park Falls, WI.
TA-W-59,137; Harte-Hanks, A Subsidiary of Harte Hanks Market
Intelligence, Sterling Heights, MI.
TA-W-59,268; Freedom Food Service, Intier Automotive Seating of
America, A Division of Elliott's, Inc., Red Oak, IA.
TA-W-59,270; GC Services, El Paso Operator Services, El Paso, TX.
TA-W-59,281; Super Hanger Supply Solutions, Inc., Longwood, FL.
The Department has determined that criterion (1) of section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older.
None.
The Department has determined that criterion (2) of section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily
transferable.
TA-W-59,386; Woodmaster, Inc., St. Anthony, IN.
The Department has determined that criterion (3) of section 246 has
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are
not adverse.
None.
I hereby certify that the fore mentioned determinations were issued
during the month of May 2006. Copies of these determinations are
available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business
hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address.
Dated: June 1, 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6-9024 Filed 6-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
