Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by the American Stock Exchange LLC Relating to Direct Registration System Eligibility Requirements, 33009-33011 [E6-8817]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 7, 2006 / Notices
(‘‘Commission’’) pursuant to section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 the proposed rule change
relating to written compliance and
supervisory controls. Amex filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change on April 6, 2006. The proposed
rule change was published for comment
in the Federal Register on April 28,
2006.3 The Commission received no
comments on the proposal. This order
approves the proposed rule change, as
amended.
II. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange is proposing to amend
Amex Rule 320 to require members and
member organizations with employees
to establish, maintain, enforce, and keep
current a system of compliance and
supervisory controls, including written
compliance and supervisory policies
and procedures, that are reasonably
designed to achieve compliance with
applicable securities laws and
regulations and Exchange rules.4 In
addition to requiring that the written
compliance and supervisory policies
and procedures be amended as
necessary, the proposed rule would
require that a member’s or member
organization’s supervisory control
employee provide reports, at least
annually, to senior management
summarizing certain aspects of the
compliance and supervisory program.5
In addition, the Exchange proposed
clarifying edits to the text of Amex Rule
320, including: (1) Explicit references to
a member’s or member organization’s
obligation to comply with Exchange
rules in addition to all applicable
securities laws and regulations, and (2)
replacing references to ‘‘member firm’’
with references to ‘‘member
organization.’’
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
The Commission has reviewed
carefully the proposed rule change and
finds that it is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(l).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53708
(April 24, 2006), 71 FR 25254.
4 See proposed Amex Rule 320(e). An Amex
member or member organization consisting of a sole
individual (i.e., a sole proprietorship) would be
required to maintain a written compliance manual
specifying the obligations to which such member or
member organization is subject along with the
processes and controls in place that are reasonably
designed to achieve compliance with such
obligations. See Amex Rule 320, proposed
Commentary .08.
5 See proposed Amex Rule 320(e)(3).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:54 Jun 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
a national securities exchange,6
particularly section 6(b)(5) of the Act,7
which, among other things, requires that
the rules of a national securities
exchange be designed to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to
foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating
transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The Commission believes that the
Exchange’s proposal to require its
members and member organizations to
establish, maintain, enforce, and keep
current a system of compliance and
supervisory controls, including written
compliance and supervisory policies
and procedures, that are reasonably
designed to achieve compliance with
applicable securities laws and
regulations and Exchange rules should
help strengthen the Exchange’s
regulatory program by increasing
member awareness of the laws and rules
with which they must comply. It should
also provide members an additional
incentive to be cognizant of changing
regulatory requirements. The Exchange
will review the adequacy of its
members’ and member organizations’
compliance programs. Further, the
requirement that Amex members and
member organizations adopt
comprehensive written compliance and
supervisory policies and procedures,
and report to senior management on
certain aspects of the compliance and
supervisory program, should result in
the periodic assessment by members
and member organizations of the
effectiveness of their compliance
programs. Accordingly, the proposed
rule change should help Amex
strengthen its regulatory program for
detecting, sanctioning, and deterring
violations of Exchange rules and
securities laws and regulations and,
therefore, should promote just and
equitable principles of trade.8
Furthermore, the Commission believes
that the Amex’s proposal should
enhance investor protection by
facilitating the Exchange’s review of its
members’ and member organizations’
systems of compliance and supervisory
6 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
8 The Commission notes that a national securities
exchange must have the capacity to enforce
compliance by its members with applicable
securities laws, regulations and the exchange’s own
rules. See e.g., section 6(b)(1) of the Act, 15 U.S.C.
78f(b)(1).
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33009
controls and by enhancing the
compliance programs at the member
level.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Act,9 that the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
Amex–2005–116), as amended, be and
hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–8802 Filed 6–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–53911; File No. SR–Amex–
2006–40]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice
of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by
the American Stock Exchange LLC
Relating to Direct Registration System
Eligibility Requirements
May 31, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder 2
notice is hereby given that on April 28,
2006, the American Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘Amex’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change described in
Items I, II, and III below, which items
have been prepared primarily by Amex.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
parties.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Amex is proposing to add new Rule
778 to its Rules and new Section 135 to
its Company Guide to require certain
listed securities to be eligible for a
Direct Registration System operated by
a securities depository.3
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
Amex included statements concerning
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The term ‘‘securities depository’’ means a
securities depository registered as a clearing agency
under Section 17A(b)(2) of the Act.
10 17
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
33010
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 7, 2006 / Notices
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. Amex has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B),
and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of these statements.4
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
(1) Purpose
In order to reduce the costs, risks, and
delays associated with the physical
delivery of securities certificates, Amex
is proposing to require (i) all securities
(other than the securities identified
below) initially listing on Amex on or
after January 1, 2007, to be eligible for
a DRS and (ii) all securities (other than
the securities identified below) listed on
Amex on and after January 1, 2008, to
be eligible for a DRS.5 The initial listing
requirement set forth in (i) above will
not apply to securities of issuers which
already have securities listed on the
Amex, securities of issuers which
immediately prior to such initial Amex
listing had securities listed on another
national securities exchange, derivative
products,6 or securities (other than
stocks) which are book-entry-only. The
ongoing listing requirement set forth in
(ii) above will not apply to derivative
products or securities (other than
stocks) which are book-entry-only.
Securities certificates are used by
issuers as a means to evidence and
transfer ownership. Because securities
certificates require manual processing
and because trading volumes have
increased, the manual clearance and
settlement systems have become
overburdened resulting in significant
delays and expenses in processing
securities transaction and in increased
risks associated with lost, stolen, and
forged certificates. In Section 17A of the
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
4 The
Commission has modified the text of the
summaries prepared by the Amex.
5 The New York Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’)
and The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’)
have also filed proposed rule changes with the
Commission that would require certain listed
companies to become DRS eligible. Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 53912 (May 31, 2006)
[File No. SR–NYSE–2006–29] and 53913 (May 31,
2006) [File No. SR–NASDAQ–2006–08].
6 As defined in Article 1, Section 3(d) of Amex’s
Constitution, the term ‘‘derivative products’’
includes in addition to standardized options, other
securities which are issued by The Options Clearing
Corporation or another limited purpose entity or
trust, and which are based solely on the
performance of an index or portfolio of other
publicly traded securities. The term ‘‘derivative
products’’ does not include warrants of any type or
closed-end management investment companies.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:54 Jun 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
Act,7 Congress recognized these
concerns by calling for the
establishment of a national system for
the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions,
including the transfer of record
ownership and the safeguarding of
securities.
A DRS allows an investor to establish
either through the issuer’s transfer agent
or through the investor’s broker-dealer a
book-entry securities position on the
books of the issuer and to electronically
transfer that securities position between
the transfer agent and the broker-dealer
through facilities administered by DTC.8
Instead of receiving a securities
certificate, the investor receives a DRS
statement as evidence of share
ownership. Investors retain the rights
associated with securities certificates,
including such rights as control of
ownership and voting rights, without
having the responsibility of holding and
safeguarding securities certificates. In
addition, in corporate actions such as
reverse stock splits and mergers,
cancellation of old shares and issuance
of new shares are handled electronically
with no securities certificates to be
returned to or received from the transfer
agent.
Issuers and their transfer agents may
incur initial costs when making an issue
DRS-eligible and in turn satisfy the new
listing standards as set forth in this
proposed rule change. In order to make
a security DRS-eligible, the issuer must
have a transfer agent which is a DRS
Limited Participants.9 Issuers will also
need to meet certain DTC criteria, such
as insurance and connectivity
requirements, in order to make an issue
DRS-eligible. Further, an issuer’s
corporate by-laws must permit the
issuance of book-entry shares. Amex
believes that the proposed deadlines for
DRS eligibility coupled with proactive
and instructive communication by
Amex with issuers, will allow issuers
7 15
U.S.C. 78q–1.
the only registered clearing agency
operating a DRS is the Depository Trust Company
(‘‘DTC’’). For a description of DRS and the DRS
facilities administered by DTC, see Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 37931 (November 7,
1996), 61 FR 58600 (November 15, 1996), [File No.
SR–DTC–96–15] (order granting approval to
establish DRS) and 41862 (September 10, 1999), 64
FR 51162 (September 21, 1999), [File No. SR–DTC–
99–16] (order approving implementation of the
Profile Modification System).
9 For a description of DTC’s rules relating to DRS
Limited Participants and a description of DRS
facilities administered by DTC, see Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 37931 (November 7,
1996), 61 FR 58600 (November 15, 1996), [File No.
SR–DTC–96–15] (order granting approval to
establish DRS) and 41862 (September 10, 1999), 64
FR 51162 (September 21, 1999), [File No. SR–DTC–
99–16] (order approving implementation of the
Profile Modification System).
8 Currently,
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
sufficient time to make the necessary
changes to comply with the proposed
rule change.
While the propose rule change should
significantly reduce the number of
transactions in securities for which
settlement is effected by the physical
delivery of securities certificates, the
proposed rule change will not eliminate
the ability of investors to obtain
securities certificates after the
settlement of securities transactions,
provided the issuer chooses to issue or
continue to issue certificates.
(2) Statutory Basis
Amex believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 6(b) of
the Act, in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,
in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with
respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.10
Amex believes that DRS eligibility
listing requirements will limit market
impediments arising from the physical
delivery of securities certificates,
thereby promoting the perfection of the
national market system. Because
investors will have the option of
holding their securities in DRS only if
the security is DRS-eligible, Amex
believes that the proposed rule change
is necessary to encourage listed issuers
to limit the use of physical certificates.
Further, the proposed rule change
should serve to increase the efficiency
of the clearance and settlement system
and prevent forgery, theft, or other
misappropriation thereby serving to
better protect the public interest.
Finally, because the costs, both direct
and indirect, associated with securities
certificates are ultimately borne by
investors, Amex believes that investors
in Amex listed securities covered by the
proposed rule change should realize the
benefits of accurate, quick, and costefficient transfers, rapid distribution of
sale proceeds, reduced lost or stolen
certificates and replacement fees,
elimination of the risk associated with
catastrophic events, and consistency of
owning in book-entry across asset
classes.
10 15
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
07JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 7, 2006 / Notices
(B) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
Amex does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
(C) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received by Amex with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within thirty-five days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period:
(i) as the Commission may designate up
to ninety days of such date if it finds
such longer period to be appropriate
and publishes its reasons for so finding;
or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve such proposed
rule change or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml) or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Amex–2006–40 in the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Amex–2006–40. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:54 Jun 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549. Copies of such filings also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of Amex
and on Amex’s Web site, https://
www.amex.com. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Amex–
2006–40 and should be submitted on or
before June 28, 2006.
For the Commission by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–8817 Filed 6–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–53909; File No. SR–CBOE–
2005–65]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing of a
Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Relating to
the Processing of Complex Orders in
the Hybrid Trading System
May 31, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August
24, 2005, the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the CBOE. The CBOE filed
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 to the
proposal on March 13, 2006, and April
11 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33011
27, 2006, respectively.3 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change, as amended, from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
CBOE proposes to amend its
procedures applicable to trading
complex orders on the Hybrid Trading
System (‘‘Hybrid System’’) to provide
for an automated Request for Responses
(‘‘RFR’’) auction process for certain
eligible complex orders (‘‘COA’’
process). CBOE is also proposing to
make various changes to the existing
routing and execution processes
applicable to the complex order book
(‘‘COB’’) and various changes to its rules
pertaining generally to the minimum
increments applicable to complex
orders. The text of the proposed rule
change appears below. Additions are
italicized; deletions are [bracketed].
*
*
*
*
*
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated
Rules
Rule 6.9. Solicited Transactions
A member or member organization
representing an order respecting an
option traded on the Exchange (an
‘‘original order’’), including a spread,
combination, or straddle order as
defined in Rule 6.53, a stock-option
order as defined in Rule 1.1(ii) [or], a
security future-option order as defined
in Rule 1.1(zz), or any other complex
order as defined in Rule 6.53C, may
solicit a member or member
organization or a non-member customer
or broker-dealer (the ‘‘solicited person’’)
to transact in-person or by order (a
‘‘solicited order’’) with the original
order. In addition, whenever a floor
broker who is aware of, but does not
represent, an original order solicits one
or more persons or orders in response to
an original order, the persons solicited
and any resulting orders are solicited
persons or solicited orders subject to
this Rule. Original orders and solicited
orders are subject to the following
conditions.
(a)–(f) No change.
* * * Interpretations & Policies:
.01–.02 No change.
.03 In respect of any solicited order
that is a spread, straddle or combination
order as defined in Rule 6.53, or any
other complex order as defined in Rule
3 Amendment No. 2 replaces and supersedes the
original filing and Amendment No. 1 in their
entirety.
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33009-33011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-8817]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-53911; File No. SR-Amex-2006-40]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule
Change by the American Stock Exchange LLC Relating to Direct
Registration System Eligibility Requirements
May 31, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder \2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 28, 2006, the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change described in Items I, II, and III below, which
items have been prepared primarily by Amex. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Amex is proposing to add new Rule 778 to its Rules and new Section
135 to its Company Guide to require certain listed securities to be
eligible for a Direct Registration System operated by a securities
depository.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The term ``securities depository'' means a securities
depository registered as a clearing agency under Section 17A(b)(2)
of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, Amex included statements
concerning
[[Page 33010]]
the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below.
Amex has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B), and (C)
below, of the most significant aspects of these statements.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Commission has modified the text of the summaries
prepared by the Amex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
(1) Purpose
In order to reduce the costs, risks, and delays associated with the
physical delivery of securities certificates, Amex is proposing to
require (i) all securities (other than the securities identified below)
initially listing on Amex on or after January 1, 2007, to be eligible
for a DRS and (ii) all securities (other than the securities identified
below) listed on Amex on and after January 1, 2008, to be eligible for
a DRS.\5\ The initial listing requirement set forth in (i) above will
not apply to securities of issuers which already have securities listed
on the Amex, securities of issuers which immediately prior to such
initial Amex listing had securities listed on another national
securities exchange, derivative products,\6\ or securities (other than
stocks) which are book-entry-only. The ongoing listing requirement set
forth in (ii) above will not apply to derivative products or securities
(other than stocks) which are book-entry-only.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'') and The NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'') have also filed proposed rule changes
with the Commission that would require certain listed companies to
become DRS eligible. Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 53912 (May
31, 2006) [File No. SR-NYSE-2006-29] and 53913 (May 31, 2006) [File
No. SR-NASDAQ-2006-08].
\6\ As defined in Article 1, Section 3(d) of Amex's
Constitution, the term ``derivative products'' includes in addition
to standardized options, other securities which are issued by The
Options Clearing Corporation or another limited purpose entity or
trust, and which are based solely on the performance of an index or
portfolio of other publicly traded securities. The term ``derivative
products'' does not include warrants of any type or closed-end
management investment companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Securities certificates are used by issuers as a means to evidence
and transfer ownership. Because securities certificates require manual
processing and because trading volumes have increased, the manual
clearance and settlement systems have become overburdened resulting in
significant delays and expenses in processing securities transaction
and in increased risks associated with lost, stolen, and forged
certificates. In Section 17A of the Act,\7\ Congress recognized these
concerns by calling for the establishment of a national system for the
prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities
transactions, including the transfer of record ownership and the
safeguarding of securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A DRS allows an investor to establish either through the issuer's
transfer agent or through the investor's broker-dealer a book-entry
securities position on the books of the issuer and to electronically
transfer that securities position between the transfer agent and the
broker-dealer through facilities administered by DTC.\8\ Instead of
receiving a securities certificate, the investor receives a DRS
statement as evidence of share ownership. Investors retain the rights
associated with securities certificates, including such rights as
control of ownership and voting rights, without having the
responsibility of holding and safeguarding securities certificates. In
addition, in corporate actions such as reverse stock splits and
mergers, cancellation of old shares and issuance of new shares are
handled electronically with no securities certificates to be returned
to or received from the transfer agent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Currently, the only registered clearing agency operating a
DRS is the Depository Trust Company (``DTC''). For a description of
DRS and the DRS facilities administered by DTC, see Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 37931 (November 7, 1996), 61 FR 58600
(November 15, 1996), [File No. SR-DTC-96-15] (order granting
approval to establish DRS) and 41862 (September 10, 1999), 64 FR
51162 (September 21, 1999), [File No. SR-DTC-99-16] (order approving
implementation of the Profile Modification System).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issuers and their transfer agents may incur initial costs when
making an issue DRS-eligible and in turn satisfy the new listing
standards as set forth in this proposed rule change. In order to make a
security DRS-eligible, the issuer must have a transfer agent which is a
DRS Limited Participants.\9\ Issuers will also need to meet certain DTC
criteria, such as insurance and connectivity requirements, in order to
make an issue DRS-eligible. Further, an issuer's corporate by-laws must
permit the issuance of book-entry shares. Amex believes that the
proposed deadlines for DRS eligibility coupled with proactive and
instructive communication by Amex with issuers, will allow issuers
sufficient time to make the necessary changes to comply with the
proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ For a description of DTC's rules relating to DRS Limited
Participants and a description of DRS facilities administered by
DTC, see Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 37931 (November 7,
1996), 61 FR 58600 (November 15, 1996), [File No. SR-DTC-96-15]
(order granting approval to establish DRS) and 41862 (September 10,
1999), 64 FR 51162 (September 21, 1999), [File No. SR-DTC-99-16]
(order approving implementation of the Profile Modification System).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While the propose rule change should significantly reduce the
number of transactions in securities for which settlement is effected
by the physical delivery of securities certificates, the proposed rule
change will not eliminate the ability of investors to obtain securities
certificates after the settlement of securities transactions, provided
the issuer chooses to issue or continue to issue certificates.
(2) Statutory Basis
Amex believes the proposed rule change is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act, in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act, in particular, in that it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to perfect the mechanism of a free
and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amex believes that DRS eligibility listing requirements will limit
market impediments arising from the physical delivery of securities
certificates, thereby promoting the perfection of the national market
system. Because investors will have the option of holding their
securities in DRS only if the security is DRS-eligible, Amex believes
that the proposed rule change is necessary to encourage listed issuers
to limit the use of physical certificates. Further, the proposed rule
change should serve to increase the efficiency of the clearance and
settlement system and prevent forgery, theft, or other misappropriation
thereby serving to better protect the public interest. Finally, because
the costs, both direct and indirect, associated with securities
certificates are ultimately borne by investors, Amex believes that
investors in Amex listed securities covered by the proposed rule change
should realize the benefits of accurate, quick, and cost-efficient
transfers, rapid distribution of sale proceeds, reduced lost or stolen
certificates and replacement fees, elimination of the risk associated
with catastrophic events, and consistency of owning in book-entry
across asset classes.
[[Page 33011]]
(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
Amex does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received by Amex with respect
to the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within thirty-five days of the date of publication of this notice
in the Federal Register or within such longer period: (i) as the
Commission may designate up to ninety days of such date if it finds
such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so
finding; or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents,
the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml) or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Amex-2006-40 in the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2006-40. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filings also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of Amex
and on Amex's Web site, https://www.amex.com. All comments received will
be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2006-40 and should be submitted on
or before June 28, 2006.
For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-8817 Filed 6-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P