In the Matter of Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Amending the Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 32127 [E6-8557]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 106 / Friday, June 2, 2006 / Notices available for public inspection in their entirety. Copies of the Draft Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area Resource Management Plan/EIS are available in the Boise District Office at the above address. Dated: February 14, 2006. John Sullivan, National Conservation Area Manager. [FR Doc. E6–8619 Filed 6–1–06; 8:45 am] INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–461 (Second Review)] Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinker From Japan Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on gray portland cement and cement clinker from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted this review on October 3, 2005 (70 FR 57617) and determined on January 6, 2006 that it would conduct an expedited review (71 FR 5069, January 31, 2006). The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the Secretary of Commerce on May 31, 2006. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3856 (May 2006), entitled Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinker from Japan: Investigation No. 731–TA–461 (Second Review). jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Issued: May 26, 2006. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–8556 Filed 6–1–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 18:05 Jun 01, 2006 [Inv. No. 337–TA–565] In the Matter of Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Amending the Complaint and Notice of Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. BILLING CODE 4310–GG–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Jkt 208001 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting the motion of complainants to amend the complaint and notice of investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael K. Haldenstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3041. Copies of the public version of the ALJ’s ID and all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS– ON–LINE) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on March 23, 2006, based on a complaint filed by Epson Portland, Inc. of Oregon, Epson America, Inc. of California, and Seiko Epson Corporation of Japan. 71 FR 14720 (2006). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain ink cartridges and components thereof by reason of infringement of claim 7 of U.S. Patent No. 5,615,957; claims 18, 81, 93, 149, 164 and 165 of U.S. Patent No. 5,622,439; claims 83 and 84 of U.S. Patent No. 5,158,377; claims 19 and 20 PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 32127 of U.S. Patent No. 5,221,148; claims 29, 31, 34 and 38 of U.S. Patent No. 5,156,472; claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,488,401; claims 1–3 and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,502,917; claims 1, 31 and 34 of U.S. Patent No. 6,550,902; and claims 1, 10 and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 6,955,422. The complaint further alleged that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainants requested that the Commission issue a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders. The Commission named as respondents 24 companies located in China, Germany, Hong Kong, Korea, and the United States. The ALJ set June 25, 2007, as the target date for completion of the investigation. The ALJ issued the subject ID on May 3, 2006. The ID grants complainants’ motion to add infringement of claim 1 of United States Patent No. 7,008,053 and claims 21, 45, 53 and 54 of United States Patent No. 7,011,397 to the complaint and notice of investigation, to submit supplemental information, and to include an additional accused device in the investigation. The ALJ found that there was ‘‘good cause’’ to permit the new allegations of infringement because the two patents had issued after the complaint was filed in this investigation and discovery was still in its early stages. The Commission investigative attorney supported complainants’ motion. Three respondents opposed the motion. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and Commission rule 210.42, 19 CFR 210.42. By order of the Commission. Issued: May 26, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–8557 Filed 5–31–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Portland Cement Association Notice is hereby given that, on May 4, 2006, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Portland Cement Association (‘‘PCA’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the E:\FR\FM\02JNN1.SGM 02JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 106 (Friday, June 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 32127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-8557]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-565]


In the Matter of Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof; 
Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial 
Determination Amending the Complaint and Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') of the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') granting 
the motion of complainants to amend the complaint and notice of 
investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael K. Haldenstein, Esq., Office 
of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3041. Copies of 
the public version of the ALJ's ID and all other nonconfidential 
documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be 
available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 
5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-
2000.
    General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained 
by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public 
record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS-ON-LINE) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-
impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be 
obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on March 23, 2006, based on a complaint filed by Epson Portland, Inc. 
of Oregon, Epson America, Inc. of California, and Seiko Epson 
Corporation of Japan. 71 FR 14720 (2006).
    The complaint alleged violations of section 337 in the importation 
into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within 
the United States after importation of certain ink cartridges and 
components thereof by reason of infringement of claim 7 of U.S. Patent 
No. 5,615,957; claims 18, 81, 93, 149, 164 and 165 of U.S. Patent No. 
5,622,439; claims 83 and 84 of U.S. Patent No. 5,158,377; claims 19 and 
20 of U.S. Patent No. 5,221,148; claims 29, 31, 34 and 38 of U.S. 
Patent No. 5,156,472; claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,488,401; claims 1-3 
and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,502,917; claims 1, 31 and 34 of U.S. Patent 
No. 6,550,902; and claims 1, 10 and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 6,955,422. 
The complaint further alleged that an industry in the United States 
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The 
complainants requested that the Commission issue a general exclusion 
order and cease and desist orders. The Commission named as respondents 
24 companies located in China, Germany, Hong Kong, Korea, and the 
United States. The ALJ set June 25, 2007, as the target date for 
completion of the investigation.
    The ALJ issued the subject ID on May 3, 2006. The ID grants 
complainants' motion to add infringement of claim 1 of United States 
Patent No. 7,008,053 and claims 21, 45, 53 and 54 of United States 
Patent No. 7,011,397 to the complaint and notice of investigation, to 
submit supplemental information, and to include an additional accused 
device in the investigation. The ALJ found that there was ``good 
cause'' to permit the new allegations of infringement because the two 
patents had issued after the complaint was filed in this investigation 
and discovery was still in its early stages. The Commission 
investigative attorney supported complainants' motion. Three 
respondents opposed the motion. No petitions for review of the ID were 
filed.
    This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and Commission rule 
210.42, 19 CFR 210.42.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 26, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E6-8557 Filed 5-31-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.