Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from Japan; Five-year Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order: Amended Final Results, 30378 [E6-8169]

Download as PDF 30378 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 2006 / Notices disclosure of which would be likely to frustrate significantly implementation of an agency action as described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) shall be exempt from the provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The remaining portions of the meeting will be open to the public. For more information, call Yvette Springer at (202) 482–4814. Dated: May 22, 2006. Yvette Springer, Committee Liaison Officer. [FR Doc. 06–4870 Filed 5–25–06 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–JT–M DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration (A–588–804] Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from Japan; Five-year Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order: Amended Final Results Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: May 26, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Frank, AD/CVD Operations 5, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0090. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Background On May 4, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register its final results of the five-year sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on ball bearings and parts thereof from Japan and Singapore. See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from Japan and Singapore; Five-year Sunset Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders; Final Results, 71 FR 26321 (May 4, 2006) (Sunset Final Results). On May 5, 2006, NSK Ltd. (NSK) submitted a ministerial–error allegation, stating that the Department used the incorrect weighted–average margin that would likely prevail if the order were revoked with respect to NSK. Citing the Notice of Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews: Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from Japan (70 FR 61252 (October 21, 2005), NSK claims that the VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:51 May 25, 2006 Jkt 208001 ultimate margin the Department determined for NSK in the 2003/2004 administrative review was 8.25 percent, not 8.28 percent as the Department stated in the Sunset Final Results. We have reviewed NSK’s allegation and agree that the weighted–average margin we intended to use in the Sunset Final Results was 8.25 percent because that is the ultimate margin resulting from the 2003/2004 administrative review. Therefore, pursuant to section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.224, we are amending the Sunset Final Results by correcting the error in this notice of amended final results of sunset review. We are issuing and publishing this determination and notice in accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: May 18, 2006. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6–8169 Filed 5–25–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–337–806] Certain Individually Quick Frozen Red Raspberries from Chile: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for 2004–2005 Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: May 26, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Holland, AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–1279. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Statutory Time Limits Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), requires the Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) to issue the preliminary results of an administrative review within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of an order for which a review is requested and a final determination within 120 days after the date on which the preliminary results PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 are published. If it is not practicable to complete the review within the time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend these deadlines to a maximum of 365 days and 180 days, respectively. Background On August 29, 2005, the Department published in the Federal Register a notice of initiation of administrative review of the antidumping duty order on individually quick frozen red raspberries from Chile, covering the period July 1, 2004, through June 30, 2005. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part, 70 FR 51009 (August 29, 2005). On March 7, 2006, the Department published in the Federal Register an extension of the time limit for the preliminary results in the antidumping duty administrative review to no later than June 13, 2006, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. See Certain Individually Quick Frozen Red Raspberries from Chile: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for 2004–2005 Administrative Review, 71 FR 11386 (March 7, 2006). The preliminary results for this administrative review are currently due no later than June 13, 2006. Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results The Department requires additional time to review, analyze, and verify the sales and cost information submitted by the parties in this administrative review. Moreover, the Department requires additional time to analyze complex issues related to producer and supplier relationships, issue additional supplemental questionnaires and fully analyze the responses. Thus, it is not practicable to complete this review within the current time limit (i.e., June 13, 2006). Therefore, the Department is extending the time limit for completion of the preliminary results to not later than July 31, 2006, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: May 18, 2006. Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6–8170 Filed 5–25–06; 8:45 am] Billing Code: 3510–DS–S E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM 26MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 30378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-8169]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

(A-588-804]


Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from Japan; Five-year Sunset 
Review of Antidumping Duty Order: Amended Final Results

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 26, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Frank, AD/CVD Operations 5, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14\th\ Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On May 4, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published in the Federal Register its final results of the five-year 
sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on ball bearings and 
parts thereof from Japan and Singapore. See Ball Bearings and Parts 
Thereof from Japan and Singapore; Five-year Sunset Reviews of 
Antidumping Duty Orders; Final Results, 71 FR 26321 (May 4, 2006) 
(Sunset Final Results).
    On May 5, 2006, NSK Ltd. (NSK) submitted a ministerial-error 
allegation, stating that the Department used the incorrect weighted-
average margin that would likely prevail if the order were revoked with 
respect to NSK. Citing the Notice of Amended Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews: Ball Bearings and Parts 
Thereof from Japan (70 FR 61252 (October 21, 2005), NSK claims that the 
ultimate margin the Department determined for NSK in the 2003/2004 
administrative review was 8.25 percent, not 8.28 percent as the 
Department stated in the Sunset Final Results.
    We have reviewed NSK's allegation and agree that the weighted-
average margin we intended to use in the Sunset Final Results was 8.25 
percent because that is the ultimate margin resulting from the 2003/
2004 administrative review. Therefore, pursuant to section 751(h) of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.224, we 
are amending the Sunset Final Results by correcting the error in this 
notice of amended final results of sunset review.
    We are issuing and publishing this determination and notice in 
accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: May 18, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-8169 Filed 5-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S