Capital City Press, Inc., Publication Services Division, Barre, VT; Notice of Revised Determination on Remand, 29981-29982 [E6-7935]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 24, 2006 / Notices
Dated: May 1, 2006.
Roy G. Weise,
Senior CJIS Advisor, Criminal Justice
Information Services Division, Federal Bureau
of Investigation.
[FR Doc. 06–4794 Filed 5–23–06; 8:45 am]
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
BILLING CODE 4410–02–M
Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of
May 2006.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–7936 Filed 5–23–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Employment and Training
Administration
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA–W–58,958]
Employment and Training
Administration
Alcan Global Pharmaceutical
Packaging, Inc.; Plastics Americas
Division; Centralia, IL; Dismissal of
Application for Reconsideration
[TA–W–57,867]
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
Alcan Global Pharmaceutical Packaging,
Inc., Plastics Americas Division,
Centralia, Illinois. The application did
not contain new information supporting
a conclusion that the determination was
erroneous, and also did not provide a
justification for reconsideration of the
determination that was based on either
mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal
of the application was issued.
TA–W–58,958; Alcan Global Pharmaceutical
Packaging, Inc., Plastics Americas
Division Centralia, Illinois (May 12,
2006)
Signed at Washington, DC this 15th day of
May 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–7948 Filed 5–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,314]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Anritsu Instruments Company
(Formerly Nettest), Utica, NY; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on May 2,
2006 in response to a worker petition
filed by a company official on behalf of
workers of Anritsu Instruments
Company, (Formerly Nettest), Utica,
New York.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:08 May 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
Capital City Press, Inc., Publication
Services Division, Barre, VT; Notice of
Revised Determination on Remand
On April 11, 2006, the United States
Court of International Trade (USCIT)
granted a consent motion for voluntary
remand in Former Employees of Capital
City Press, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of
Labor, Court No. 06–00081.
On August 31, 2005, a company
official filed a petition for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) with the U.S.
Department of Labor (Department) on
behalf of workers at Capital City Press,
Inc., Publication Services Division,
Barre, Vermont (subject firm). The
company official stated that the subject
firm was shifting production of
scientific journals and books to the
Philippines and India and importing
those products from those countries.
The initial investigation revealed that
the workers created documents
electronically and that the subject firm
imported the publications in an
electronic format. The Department
determined that the workers did not
produce an article within the meaning
of Section 222 of the Trade Act. The
determination was issued on October
21, 2005. On November 9, 2005, the
Department’s Notice of negative
determination was published in the
Federal Register (70 FR 68099).
By letters dating November 22, 2005
and December 5, 2005, the subject firm
and Local One-L, Graphic
Communications Conference,
International Brotherhood of Teamsters,
(Union), respectively, requested
administrative reconsideration of the
Department’s negative determination
regarding eligibility for the subject
workers to apply for TAA and ATAA.
The Department’s Notice of Dismissal
of Application for Reconsideration was
issued on January 10, 2006, and
published in the Federal Register on
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29981
January 17, 2006 (71 FR 2566). The
Department determined that the
electronic nature of the publications
created by the workers and brought into
the United States by the subject firm
barred the subject workers for
consideration as production workers.
Since the publication of the Notice of
Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm,
the Department has revised its policy to
acknowledge that there are tangible and
intangible articles and to clarify that the
production of intangible articles can be
distinguished from the provision of
services. Intangible goods that would
have been considered articles, for the
purposes of the Trade Act, if embodied
in a physical medium are now
considered to be articles regardless of
their method of transfer.
The Department stresses that it will
continue to implement the longstanding
precedent that firms must produce an
article to be certified under the Trade
Act. This determination is not altered by
the fact the provision of a service may
result in the incidental creation of an
article. Because the revised policy may
have implications beyond this case of
which the Department is not fully
cognizant, it will be further developed
in rulemaking.
Therefore, due to the Department’s
policy change, the Department
requested the voluntary remand to
conduct an investigation to determine
whether the subject workers are eligible
to apply for TAA and ATAA.
Reviewing previously-submitted
information through the lens of the
revised policy, the Department has
determined that, for purposes of the
Trade Act, the subject workers are
engaged in activity related to the
production of an article (scientific
journals and books). The Department
has also determined that during the
relevant period, a significant portion of
workers was separated from the subject
facility, production shifted abroad, and
the subject firm increased its imports of
publications following the shift abroad.
In accordance with section 246 the
Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as
amended, the Department herein
presents the results of its investigation
regarding certification of eligibility to
apply for ATAA for older workers. In
order for the Department to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
ATAA, the group eligibility
requirements of Section 246 of the
Trade Act must be met. The Department
has determined in this case that the
requirements of section 246 have been
met.
E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM
24MYN1
29982
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 24, 2006 / Notices
A significant number of workers at the
firm are age 50 or over and possess
skills that are not easily transferable.
Competitive conditions within the
industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts
generated through the second remand
investigation, I determine that a shift in
production abroad of publications like
or directly competitive to that produced
at the subject facilities followed by
increased imports contributed to the
total or partial separation of a significant
number or proportion of workers at the
subject facilities. In accordance with the
provisions of the Act, I make the
following certification:
All workers of Capital City Press, Inc.,
Publication Services Division, Barre,
Vermont, who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after
August 31, 2004, through two years from the
issuance of this revised determination, are
eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance under Section 223 of the Trade
Act of 1974, and are eligible to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of
May 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–7935 Filed 5–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
country. The denial notice was
published in the Federal Register on
March 10, 2006 (71 FR 12396).
To support the request for
reconsideration, the petitioner supplied
additional information to supplement
that which was gathered during the
initial investigation. Upon further
review of the information and a contact
with the company official, it was
revealed that the subject firm shifted
two production lines of the
polycarbonate bottles to Canada during
the relevant period and that this shift
contributed to the layoffs at the subject
firm.
In accordance with section 246 the
Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as
amended, the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of its
investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance (ATAA) for older
workers.
In order for the Department to issue
a certification of eligibility to apply for
ATAA, the group eligibility
requirements of Section 246 of the
Trade Act must be met. The Department
has determined in this case that the
requirements of section 246 have been
met.
A significant number of workers at the
firm are age 50 or over and possess
skills that are not easily transferable.
Competitive conditions within the
industry are adverse.
Conclusion
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
After careful review of the facts
obtained in the investigation, I
determine that there was a shift in
production from the workers’ firm or
subdivision to Canada of articles that
are like or directly competitive with
those produced by the subject firm or
subdivision. In accordance with the
provisions of the Act, I make the
following certification:
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,629]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Consolidated Container Company
Beverage and Industrial Container
Division, Leetsdale, PA; Notice of
Revised Determination on
Reconsideration
By application of March 13, 2006, the
United Electrical, Radio & Machine
Workers of America, Local 690
requested administrative
reconsideration regarding the
Department’s Negative Determination
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance,
applicable to the workers of the subject
firm.
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination issued on
February 15, 2006, was based on the
finding that imports of polycarbonate
bottles did not contribute importantly to
worker separations at the subject plant
and that there was no shift to a foreign
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:08 May 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
All workers of Consolidated Container
Company, Beverage & Industrial Container
Division, Leetsdale, Pennsylvania who
became totally or partially separated from
employment on or after January 11, 2005
through two years from the date of
certification are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of
the Trade Act of 1974 and are eligible to
apply for alternative trade adjustment
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act
of 1974.
Signed in Washington, DC this 12th day of
May 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–7938 Filed 5–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,176]
East Palestine China Company, East
Palestine, OH; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on April 10,
2006 in response to a worker petition
filed by a company official on behalf of
workers at East Palestine China
Company, East Palestine, Ohio.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 11th day of
May 2006.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–7945 Filed 5–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19
U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
periods of May 2006.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
directly-impacted (primary) worker
adjustment assistance to be issued, each
of the group eligibility requirements of
Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM
24MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29981-29982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7935]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-57,867]
Capital City Press, Inc., Publication Services Division, Barre,
VT; Notice of Revised Determination on Remand
On April 11, 2006, the United States Court of International Trade
(USCIT) granted a consent motion for voluntary remand in Former
Employees of Capital City Press, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of Labor, Court
No. 06-00081.
On August 31, 2005, a company official filed a petition for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
(ATAA) with the U.S. Department of Labor (Department) on behalf of
workers at Capital City Press, Inc., Publication Services Division,
Barre, Vermont (subject firm). The company official stated that the
subject firm was shifting production of scientific journals and books
to the Philippines and India and importing those products from those
countries.
The initial investigation revealed that the workers created
documents electronically and that the subject firm imported the
publications in an electronic format. The Department determined that
the workers did not produce an article within the meaning of Section
222 of the Trade Act. The determination was issued on October 21, 2005.
On November 9, 2005, the Department's Notice of negative determination
was published in the Federal Register (70 FR 68099).
By letters dating November 22, 2005 and December 5, 2005, the
subject firm and Local One-L, Graphic Communications Conference,
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, (Union), respectively,
requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding eligibility for the subject workers to apply
for TAA and ATAA.
The Department's Notice of Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration was issued on January 10, 2006, and published in the
Federal Register on January 17, 2006 (71 FR 2566). The Department
determined that the electronic nature of the publications created by
the workers and brought into the United States by the subject firm
barred the subject workers for consideration as production workers.
Since the publication of the Notice of Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration applicable to workers and former workers of the subject
firm, the Department has revised its policy to acknowledge that there
are tangible and intangible articles and to clarify that the production
of intangible articles can be distinguished from the provision of
services. Intangible goods that would have been considered articles,
for the purposes of the Trade Act, if embodied in a physical medium are
now considered to be articles regardless of their method of transfer.
The Department stresses that it will continue to implement the
longstanding precedent that firms must produce an article to be
certified under the Trade Act. This determination is not altered by the
fact the provision of a service may result in the incidental creation
of an article. Because the revised policy may have implications beyond
this case of which the Department is not fully cognizant, it will be
further developed in rulemaking.
Therefore, due to the Department's policy change, the Department
requested the voluntary remand to conduct an investigation to determine
whether the subject workers are eligible to apply for TAA and ATAA.
Reviewing previously-submitted information through the lens of the
revised policy, the Department has determined that, for purposes of the
Trade Act, the subject workers are engaged in activity related to the
production of an article (scientific journals and books). The
Department has also determined that during the relevant period, a
significant portion of workers was separated from the subject facility,
production shifted abroad, and the subject firm increased its imports
of publications following the shift abroad.
In accordance with section 246 the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C.
2813), as amended, the Department herein presents the results of its
investigation regarding certification of eligibility to apply for ATAA
for older workers. In order for the Department to issue a certification
of eligibility to apply for ATAA, the group eligibility requirements of
Section 246 of the Trade Act must be met. The Department has determined
in this case that the requirements of section 246 have been met.
[[Page 29982]]
A significant number of workers at the firm are age 50 or over and
possess skills that are not easily transferable. Competitive conditions
within the industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts generated through the second
remand investigation, I determine that a shift in production abroad of
publications like or directly competitive to that produced at the
subject facilities followed by increased imports contributed to the
total or partial separation of a significant number or proportion of
workers at the subject facilities. In accordance with the provisions of
the Act, I make the following certification:
All workers of Capital City Press, Inc., Publication Services
Division, Barre, Vermont, who became totally or partially separated
from employment on or after August 31, 2004, through two years from
the issuance of this revised determination, are eligible to apply
for Trade Adjustment Assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act
of 1974, and are eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of May 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6-7935 Filed 5-23-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P