Fresh Garlic From China, 29352-29353 [E6-7689]

Download as PDF 29352 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2006 / Notices Superintendent at Big Thicket National Preserve, Kountze, Texas. Michael D. Snyder, Director, Intermountain Region. [FR Doc. 06–4709 Filed 5–19–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–CB–M DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Notice of Proposed National Natural Landmark Designation for the Irvine Ranch Land Reserve, California National Park Service, Interior. Notice; correction. AGENCY: ACTION: The National Park Service published a document in the Federal Register of March 31, 2006, concerning the proposed National Natural Landmark Designation for the Irvine Ranch Land Reserve, CA which will be considered for recommendation at the June National Park System Advisory Board Meeting. The document contained an incorrect date and location. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Gibbons at 360–856–5700, extension 306. SUMMARY: Correction In the Federal Register of March 31, 2006, in FR Doc. 06–3161, on page 16341, in the second column, correct the ‘‘SUMMARY’’ caption to read: SUMMARY: The National Park Service has evaluated and determined that the Irvine Ranch Land Reserve, located forty-five miles south of downtown Los Angeles, in Orange County, California appears to meet the criteria for national significance and proposes to recommend the site for designation as a National Natural Landmark. The public is invited to comment on this recommendation. The proposal will be considered by the National Park System Advisory Board at a meeting to be held on June 9, 2006 at Zion Lodge (Auditorium), Zion National Park, Springdale, Utah 84767. Dated: April 26, 2006. Steve Martin, Deputy Director, National Park Service. [FR Doc. E6–7722 Filed 5–19–06; 8:45 am] SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) has revised existing policies and procedures that guide its acceptance of donations and its relationships to those who desire to raise private sector support to benefit parks and programs. The policies and procedures apply to all units of the national park system, and supersede and replace the policies and procedures originally issued in 1998 that were subsequently extended pending the completion of the revision. DATES: The document may be accessed on the Internet at https://www.nps.gov/ policy/DOrders/DO21.html beginning May 22, 2006. ADDRESSES: The revised Director’s Order #21 and it accompanying reference guide is available on the Internet at https://www.nps.gov/policy/DOrders/ DO21.html. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Piltzecker at (202) 354–2150 or partnerships@nps.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NPS policies and procedures governing the role of the NPS in accepting donations and authorizing non-profit park support groups to raise funds on behalf of or for the benefit of the National Park System have previously been published in the form of Director’s Order #21. The guidelines are superseded by the new Director’s Order #21 (and a reference guide that has been issued concurrently). The topics included in the Director’s Order include: Acceptance of donations, recognition provided to donors, authorization of fundraising (including for construction projects), cause-related corporate campaigns, and marketing exclusivity granted to Proud Partners of the National Park Foundation. Dated: April 26, 2006. Steve Martin, Deputy Director, National Park Service. [FR Doc. E6–7723 Filed 5–19–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–70–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–683 (Second Review)] BILLING CODE 4310–70–P Fresh Garlic From China DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR International Trade Commission. ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited fiveyear review concerning the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from China. AGENCY: cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES National Park Service Notice of Availability of the Revised National Park Service Director’s Order #21, Donations and Fundraising National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability. AGENCY: VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:16 May 19, 2006 Jkt 208001 SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). DATES: Effective Date: May 8, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dana Lofgren (202–205–3185), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background.—On May 8, 2006, the Commission determined that the domestic interested party group responses to its notice of institution (71 FR 5374, February 1, 2006) of the subject five-year review were adequate and that the respondent interested party group responses were inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant conducting a full review.1 Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct an expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.2 Staff report.—A staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of the review will be placed in the nonpublic record on June 29, 2006, and made available to persons on the Administrative Protective Order service list for this review. A public version will be issued thereafter, 1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. 2 Commissioner Daniel R. Pearson concluded that the domestic group response was adequate and the respondent group response was inadequate, but that circumstances warranted a full review. E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM 22MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2006 / Notices cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. Written submissions.—As provided in section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties that are parties to this review and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of institution, and any party other than an interested party to the review may file written comments with the Secretary on what determination the Commission should reach in the review. Comments are due on or before July 7, 2006 and may not contain new factual information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year review nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the review by July 7, 2006. However, should the Department of Commerce extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its review, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce’s final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce’s results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 Fed. Reg. 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even where electronic filing of a document is permitted, certain documents must also be filed in paper form, as specified in II (C) of the Commission’s Handbook on Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 Fed. Reg. 68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002). In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Determination.—The Commission has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)(5)(B). Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Issued: May 15, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–7689 Filed 5–19–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1933—American Society of Mechanical Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on May 2, 2006, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (‘‘ASME’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, since November 18, 2005, ASME has published several new standards and initiated a new standards activity within the general nature and scope of ASME’s standards development activities, as specified in its original notification and transferred other activities to other standards developers. More detail regarding these changes can be found at www.asme.org. On September 15, 2004, ASME filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 13, 2004 (69 FR 60895). The last notification was filed with the Department on November 25, 2005. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on December 15, 2005 (70 FR 74333). Dorothy B. Fountain, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 06–4724 Filed 5–19–06; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Global Climate and Energy Project Notice is hereby given that, on April 24, 2006, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Global Climate and Energy Project (‘‘GCEP’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, the members of GCEP have, as of September 1, 2003, September 1, 2004, and September 1, 2005, amended the agreement between them to extend the termination of the project, which currently will terminate August 31, 2008, unless further extended. The amendments also provided for funding of GCEP and for additional specified projects, each of which is within the scope of the purpose of GCEP as originally established and notified. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project, and GCEP intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership. On March 12, 2003, GCEP filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 4, 2003 (68 FR 16552). The last notification was filed with the Department on April 16, 2003. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 21, 2003 (68 FR 27865). Dorothy B. Fountain, Deputy Director Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 06–4723 Filed 5–19–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–M BILLING CODE 4410–11–M By order of the Commission. VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:16 May 19, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 29353 E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM 22MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29352-29353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7689]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-683 (Second Review)]


Fresh Garlic From China

AGENCY: International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited five-year review concerning the 
antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from China.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an 
expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation 
of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from China would be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within 
a reasonably foreseeable time. For further information concerning the 
conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A 
through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 
CFR part 207).

DATES: Effective Date: May 8, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dana Lofgren (202-205-3185), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information 
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special 
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the 
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning 
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server 
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Background.--On May 8, 2006, the Commission determined that the 
domestic interested party group responses to its notice of institution 
(71 FR 5374, February 1, 2006) of the subject five-year review were 
adequate and that the respondent interested party group responses were 
inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that 
would warrant conducting a full review.\1\ Accordingly, the Commission 
determined that it would conduct an expedited review pursuant to 
section 751(c)(3) of the Act.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's 
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements 
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 
Commission's Web site.
    \2\ Commissioner Daniel R. Pearson concluded that the domestic 
group response was adequate and the respondent group response was 
inadequate, but that circumstances warranted a full review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Staff report.--A staff report containing information concerning the 
subject matter of the review will be placed in the nonpublic record on 
June 29, 2006, and made available to persons on the Administrative 
Protective Order service list for this review. A public version will be 
issued thereafter,

[[Page 29353]]

pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission's rules.
    Written submissions.--As provided in section 207.62(d) of the 
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to this review 
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of 
institution, and any party other than an interested party to the review 
may file written comments with the Secretary on what determination the 
Commission should reach in the review. Comments are due on or before 
July 7, 2006 and may not contain new factual information. Any person 
that is neither a party to the five-year review nor an interested party 
may submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new 
factual information) pertinent to the review by July 7, 2006. However, 
should the Department of Commerce extend the time limit for its 
completion of the final results of its review, the deadline for 
comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce's 
final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce's 
results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), 
they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 
207.7 of the Commission's rules. The Commission's rules do not 
authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or 
electronic means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of 
the Commission's rules, as amended, 67 Fed. Reg. 68036 (November 8, 
2002). Even where electronic filing of a document is permitted, certain 
documents must also be filed in paper form, as specified in II (C) of 
the Commission's Handbook on Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 Fed. Reg. 
68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002).
    In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each 
document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other 
parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI 
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The 
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate 
of service.
    Determination.--The Commission has determined to exercise its 
authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 
U.S.C. Sec.  1675(c)(5)(B).

    Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 15, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E6-7689 Filed 5-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.