Silicomanganese From Brazil: Notice of Intent to Rescind Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 29123-29124 [E6-7683]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Notices
final results of a review within 90 days
after the date on which the preliminary
results were issued. The Department
may, however, extend the deadline for
completion of the final results of a new
shipper review to 150 days if it
determines that the case is
extraordinarily complicated (19 CFR
351.214 (i)(2)).
The Department has determined that
the review is extraordinarily
complicated as the Department must
consider numerous arguments presented
in the case briefs of the three
respondents and petitioner’s rebuttal
brief including arguments regarding the
respondents’ sales prices, quantities,
and issues relating to two respondents’
U.S. affiliates. Based on the timing of
the case, the final results of this new
shipper review cannot be completed
within the statutory time limit of 90
days. Accordingly, the Department is
extending the time limit for the
completion of the final results by 30
days from the original May 24, 2006,
deadline, to June 23, 2006, in
accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2).
This notice is published pursuant to
sections 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: May 15, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–7688 Filed 5–18–06; 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–863]
Honey from the People’s Republic of
China: Extension of Time Limit for
Preliminary Results of 2004/2005 New
Shipper Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 19, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristina Boughton or Bobby Wong AD/
CVD Operations, Office 9, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–8173 or (202) 482–
0409, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
On December 10, 2001, the
Department of Commerce (the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
Department) published in the Federal
Register an antidumping duty order
covering honey from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC). Notice of
Amended Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value and
Antidumping Duty Order; Honey from
the People’s Republic of China, 66 FR
63670 (December 10, 2001). The
Department received timely requests
from Shanghai Taiside Trading Co., Ltd.
(Taiside) and Wuhan Shino–Food Trade
Co., Ltd. (Shino–Food), in accordance
with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and
19 CFR 351.214(c), for new shipper
reviews of the antidumping duty order
on honey from the PRC, which has a
December annual anniversary month
and a June semi–annual anniversary
month.
On August 5, 2005, the Department
initiated a review with respect to
Taiside and Shino–Food. Honey from
the People’s Republic of China:
Initiation of New Shipper Antidumping
Duty Review, 70 FR 45367 (August 5,
2005).
On January 13, 2006, the Department
extended the deadline for the
preliminary results to March 31, 2006.
Honey from the People’s Republic of
China: Extension of Time Limit for
Preliminary Results of 2004/2005 New
Shipper Review, 71 FR 2182 (January 13,
2006). On March 9, 2006, the
Department further extended the
deadline for the preliminary results to
May 22, 2006. Honey from the People’s
Republic of China: Extension of Time
Limit for Preliminary Results of 2004/
2005 New Shipper Review, 71 FR 12178
(March 9, 2006).
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act,
and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(1) require the
Department to issue the preliminary
results of a new shipper review within
180 days after the date on which the
new shipper review was initiated and
final results of a review within 90 days
after the date on which the preliminary
results were issued. The Department
may, however, extend the deadline for
completion of the preliminary results of
a new shipper review to 300 days if it
determines that the case is
extraordinarily complicated. See section
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.214(i)(2).
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2), the
Department has determined that, due to
the extraordinarily complicated nature
of this review, specifically the complex
issues raised in this review segment,
including honey valuation and bona
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29123
fides issues arising from verification, it
is not practicable to complete this
administrative review within the
current time limit. Accordingly, the
Department is extending the time limit
for the completion of the preliminary
results until May 30, 2006, which is the
first business day 300 days from the
date on which this new shipper review
was initiated, in accordance with
section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.214(i)(2). The final results, in
turn, will be due 90 days after the date
of issuance of the preliminary results,
unless extended.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: May 15, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–7680 Filed 5–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–351–824]
Silicomanganese From Brazil: Notice
of Intent to Rescind Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request from
Eramet Marietta Inc., a domestic
producer of silicomanganese, the
Department of Commerce initiated an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on
silicomanganese from Brazil. The period
of review covers December 1, 2004,
through November 30, 2005. Because
the sole respondent reported that it had
no sales or shipments to the United
States during the period of review, we
intend to rescind the review.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 19, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yang Jin Chun at (202) 482–5760 or
Dmitry Vladimirov at (202) 482–0665,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published an antidumping
duty order on silicomanganese from
Brazil on December 22, 1994. See Notice
of Antidumping Duty Order:
Silicomanganese from Brazil, 59 FR
66003 (December 22, 1994). On
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
29124
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Notices
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
December 1, 2005, the Department
published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order for the period
of review covering December 1, 2004,
through November 30, 2005. See Notice
of Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review of Antidumping
or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding,
or Suspended Investigation, 70 FR
72109 (December 1, 2005). In
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1),
the petitioner, Eramet Marietta Inc.,
requested an administrative review of
this order with respect to the following
ˆ
respondents: Rio Doce Manganes S.A.,
Companhia Paulista de Ferro–Ligas, and
Urucum Mineracao S.A. (collectively
¸˜
RDM/CPFL).
The Department published the
initiation of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on
silicomanganese from Brazil on
February 1, 2006. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for
Revocation in Part, 71 FR 5241
(February 1, 2006).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is silicomanganese.
Silicomanganese, which is sometimes
called ferrosilicon manganese, is a
ferroalloy composed principally of
manganese, silicon and iron, and
normally contains much smaller
proportions of minor elements, such as
carbon, phosphorus, and sulfur.
Silicomanganese generally contains by
weight not less than 4 percent iron,
more than 30 percent manganese, more
than 8 percent silicon, and not more
than 3 percent phosphorous. All
compositions, forms, and sizes of
silicomanganese are included within the
scope of the order, including
silicomanganese slag, fines, and
briquettes. Silicomanganese is used
primarily in steel production as a source
of both silicon and manganese.
Silicomanganese is currently
classifiable under subheading
7202.30.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Some silicomanganese may also
currently be classifiable under HTSUS
subheading 7202.99.5040. This order
covers all silicomanganese, regardless of
its tariff classification. Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the order remains
dispositive.
Intent to Rescind Administrative
Review
The Department will rescind an
administrative review with respect to an
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
exporter or producer if the Department
concludes that there were no entries,
exports, or sales of the subject
merchandise to the United States during
the period of review. See 19 CFR
351.213(d)(3). In response to the
Department’s questionnaire, RDM/CPFL
notified the Department that the
company had no entries, exports, or
sales of the subject merchandise to the
United States during the period of
review. Eramet Marietta Inc. submitted
no information rebutting RDM/CPFL’s
response.
The Department conducted a customs
data query to ascertain whether there
were suspended entries of subject
merchandise. See April 12, 2006,
Memorandum to File entitled
‘‘Silicomanganese from Brazil: Internal
Customs Data Query.’’ Based on the data
query, there is no evidence of entries or
shipments of the subject merchandise
by RDM/CPFL during the period of
review. Therefore, we intend to rescind
the review.
In accordance with the Department’s
clarification of its assessment policy
(see Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May
6, 2003)), in the event any entries were
made during the period of review
through intermediaries under U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
case numbers for RDM/CPFL, the
Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate such entries at the all–others
rate in effect on the date of entry.
Public Comment
An interested party may request a
hearing within 15 days of publication of
this notice of intent to rescind. See 19
CFR 351.310(c). Any hearing, if
requested, will be held 30 days after the
date of publication, or the first working
day thereafter. Interested parties may
submit case briefs no later than 15 days
after the date of publication of this
notice of intent to rescind. See 19 CFR
351.309(c)(ii). Rebuttal briefs, limited to
issues raised in case briefs, may be filed
no later than five days after the time
limit for filing the case brief. See 19 CFR
351.309(d). Parties who submit
arguments are requested to submit with
the argument (1) a statement of the
issue, (2) a brief summary of the
argument, and (3) a table of authorities.
Further, parties submitting written
comments should provide the
Department with an additional copy of
the public version of any such
comments on diskette. The Department
will issue the final notice, which will
include the results of its analysis of
issues raised in any such comments, or
at a hearing, if requested, within 120
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
days of publication of this notice of
intent to rescind.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d).
Dated: May 15, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–7683 Filed 5–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–808]
Stainless Steel Wire Rods from India:
Notice of Intent to Rescind
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from
interested parties, the Department of
Commerce is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel wire rods from India for the period
December 1, 2004, through November
30, 2005. The Department of Commerce
intends to rescind this review with
respect to Viraj Alloys, Ltd., Viraj
Forgings, Ltd., Viraj Impoexpo, Ltd.,
Viraj Smelting, Viraj Profiles, and VSL
Wires, Ltd., and Mukand Limited after
concluding that there were no entries of
merchandise subject to the order during
the period of review.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 19, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Holman at (202) 482–3683 or Kristin
Case at (202) 482–1374, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On December 1, 1993, the Department
of Commerce (the Department)
published the antidumping duty order
on stainless steel wire rods (wire rods)
from India. See Antidumping Duty
Order: Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods
from India, 58 FR 63335 (December 1,
1993). On December 1, 2005, the
Department published a notice in the
Federal Register providing an
opportunity for interested parties to
request an administrative review of the
order on wire rods from India for the
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29123-29124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7683]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-351-824]
Silicomanganese From Brazil: Notice of Intent to Rescind
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request from Eramet Marietta Inc., a domestic
producer of silicomanganese, the Department of Commerce initiated an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on silicomanganese
from Brazil. The period of review covers December 1, 2004, through
November 30, 2005. Because the sole respondent reported that it had no
sales or shipments to the United States during the period of review, we
intend to rescind the review.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 19, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun at (202) 482-5760 or
Dmitry Vladimirov at (202) 482-0665, AD/CVD Operations, Office 5,
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14\th\ Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of Commerce (the Department)
published an antidumping duty order on silicomanganese from Brazil on
December 22, 1994. See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order:
Silicomanganese from Brazil, 59 FR 66003 (December 22, 1994). On
[[Page 29124]]
December 1, 2005, the Department published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order for the
period of review covering December 1, 2004, through November 30, 2005.
See Notice of Opportunity to Request Administrative Review of
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation, 70 FR 72109 (December 1, 2005). In accordance with 19
CFR 351.213(b)(1), the petitioner, Eramet Marietta Inc., requested an
administrative review of this order with respect to the following
respondents: Rio Doce Mangan[ecirc]s S.A., Companhia Paulista de Ferro-
Ligas, and Urucum Minera[ccedil][atilde]o S.A. (collectively RDM/CPFL).
The Department published the initiation of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on silicomanganese from Brazil on
February 1, 2006. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 71 FR 5241
(February 1, 2006).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order is silicomanganese.
Silicomanganese, which is sometimes called ferrosilicon manganese, is a
ferroalloy composed principally of manganese, silicon and iron, and
normally contains much smaller proportions of minor elements, such as
carbon, phosphorus, and sulfur. Silicomanganese generally contains by
weight not less than 4 percent iron, more than 30 percent manganese,
more than 8 percent silicon, and not more than 3 percent phosphorous.
All compositions, forms, and sizes of silicomanganese are included
within the scope of the order, including silicomanganese slag, fines,
and briquettes. Silicomanganese is used primarily in steel production
as a source of both silicon and manganese.
Silicomanganese is currently classifiable under subheading
7202.30.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS). Some silicomanganese may also currently be classifiable under
HTSUS subheading 7202.99.5040. This order covers all silicomanganese,
regardless of its tariff classification. Although the HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written
description of the order remains dispositive.
Intent to Rescind Administrative Review
The Department will rescind an administrative review with respect
to an exporter or producer if the Department concludes that there were
no entries, exports, or sales of the subject merchandise to the United
States during the period of review. See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). In
response to the Department's questionnaire, RDM/CPFL notified the
Department that the company had no entries, exports, or sales of the
subject merchandise to the United States during the period of review.
Eramet Marietta Inc. submitted no information rebutting RDM/CPFL's
response.
The Department conducted a customs data query to ascertain whether
there were suspended entries of subject merchandise. See April 12,
2006, Memorandum to File entitled ``Silicomanganese from Brazil:
Internal Customs Data Query.'' Based on the data query, there is no
evidence of entries or shipments of the subject merchandise by RDM/CPFL
during the period of review. Therefore, we intend to rescind the
review.
In accordance with the Department's clarification of its assessment
policy (see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003)), in the event any
entries were made during the period of review through intermediaries
under U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) case numbers for RDM/
CPFL, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the
all-others rate in effect on the date of entry.
Public Comment
An interested party may request a hearing within 15 days of
publication of this notice of intent to rescind. See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
Any hearing, if requested, will be held 30 days after the date of
publication, or the first working day thereafter. Interested parties
may submit case briefs no later than 15 days after the date of
publication of this notice of intent to rescind. See 19 CFR
351.309(c)(ii). Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case
briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the time limit for
filing the case brief. See 19 CFR 351.309(d). Parties who submit
arguments are requested to submit with the argument (1) a statement of
the issue, (2) a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of
authorities. Further, parties submitting written comments should
provide the Department with an additional copy of the public version of
any such comments on diskette. The Department will issue the final
notice, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised
in any such comments, or at a hearing, if requested, within 120 days of
publication of this notice of intent to rescind.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d).
Dated: May 15, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-7683 Filed 5-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S