Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 29129-29130 [E6-7628]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Notices
prior to dam construction and
determination of how or whether the
dam has contributed to water quality
impairment as part of the ‘‘baseline
conditions analysis’’. After the analysis,
future studies would be determined
with the resource agencies, Local
Sponsors, and Stakeholders.
ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District,
Environmental Resources Branch,
CESPL–PD–RN, 915 Wilshire
Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90017.
Attention to Randy Tabije, Ecosystem
Planning.
DATES: A public scoping meeting has
been scheduled for Wednesday, May 31,
2006 at 7 p.m. at the San Bernardino
County Flood Control District Offices,
825 East Third Street, San Bernadino,
CA 92415.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Randy Tabije, Environmental
Coordinator, (213) 452–3871 or e-mail at
Roland.R.Tabije@usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
1. Authorization
A specific appropriation to initiate the
study was provided in the Energy and
Water Development Appropriations Bill,
2006, approved May 18, 2005: ‘‘Santa
Ana River Mainstem, California—* * *;
and $1,000,000 is available for the
Seven Oaks Dam Water Quality Study.’’
2. Background
The Seven Oaks Dam is part of the
Santa Ana River Mainstem Project that
provides flood control to downstream
communities in three counties. All of
the storage space (currently computed at
147,900 acre-feet) behind Seven Oaks
Dam is allocated to flood control and
estimated sediment deposition
purposes. The basic plan of operation is
to store flood runoff until the reservoir
elevation at Prado Dam (35 miles
downstream) peaks and starts to fall.
The flood control and environmental
operation plan for Seven Oaks Dam
provides substantial incidental water
conservation benefits. Flood events that
normally sweep rapidly past water
conservation diversion facilities are now
captured by the dam, and released at
rates that are much smaller than the
inflow to the dam. The relatively slower
release of flood runoff is also for a much
longer duration than the natural flood
event. The anticipated net result is a
greatly enhanced capability for water
agencies to divert flood runoff than
without the dam.
3. Proposed Objectives
The purpose of this study is to
evaluate the impacts, if any, of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
Seven Oaks Dam and present an array
of recommendations to achieve and
sustain water quality to the pre-Seven
Oaks Dam level(s). Based on the results
of the water quality analysis,
determinations would be made for the
need of any further studies. No
proposed alternative plans have been
formulated to date. Proposed objectives
are:
a. Identify links between water
quality, water conservation, and other
environmental impacts.
b. Identify degraded water quality and
quantify the types and sources of
pollution.
c. Develop targets for water quality,
based on pre-dam conditions.
d. Inventory and evaluate a suite of
structural, non-structural, and other
measures capable of improving water
quality.
e. Integrate planned and existing
water-quality, restoration, and
management programs with other
Federal, State, Tribal (if applicable), and
local programs and projects.
f. Recommend additional programs
and projects needed for improvement of
water quality.
g. Identify appropriate sources of
funding.
4. Scoping Process
a. Potential impacts associated with
the proposed action will be evaluated.
Resource categories that will be
analyzed are: land use, physical
environment, geology, biological
resources, agricultural resources, air
quality, ground water, recreational
usage, aesthetics, cultural resources,
transportation/communication,
hazardous waste, socioeconomic and
safety.
b. Participation of affected Federal,
State and local resource agencies, Native
American groups and concerned interest
groups/individuals is encouraged in the
scoping process. Time and location of
the Public Scoping meeting will also be
announced by means of a letter, public
announcements and news release.
Public participation will be especially
important in defingin the scope of
analysis in the Environment Impact
Statement (EIS), identifying significant
environmental issues and impact
analysis in the EIS and providing useful
information such as published and
unpublished data, personal knowledge
of relevant issues and recommending
mitigative measures associated with the
proposed action. Those interested in
providing information or data relevant
to the environmental or social impacts
that should be included or considered
in the environmental analysis can
furnish this information by writing to
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29129
the points of contact (see ADDRESSES). A
mailing list will also be established so
pertinent data may be distributed to
interested parties.
Dated: May 9, 2006.
Alex C. Dornstauder,
Colonel, U.S. Army, District Engineer.
[FR Doc. 06–4685 Filed 5–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–KF–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Exchange of Government Property at
Devens Reserve Forces Training Area
to MassDevelopment for Future
Development
AGENCY:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
DoD.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: In accordance with 10 United
States Code 2869, the Department of the
Army intends to enter into an Exchange
Agreement with MassDevelopment for
the exchange of 13.57+/¥ acres of
Government owned land at Devens
Reserve Forces Training Area, Devens,
Massachusetts, in exchange for
renovations to several buildings at
Devens Reserve Forces Training Area.
The purpose of this notice is to effect
the exchange pursuant to provisions of
10 U.S.C. 2869.
This is a partial transfer of the entire
acreage located at the facility.
Additional information is on file with
the U.S. Army Engineer District, Corps
of Engineers, Louisville, Kentucky.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Valerie Doss, 502–315–6979.
ADDRESSES: Documents are on file at
U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville,
Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box 59,
Louisville, Kentucky 40201–0059.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.
Michael G. Barter,
Chief, Real Estate Division.
[FR Doc. E6–7643 Filed 5–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–JB–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Department of Education.
SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official,
Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management invites
comments on the submission for OMB
review as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
29130
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Notices
Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before June 19,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be addressed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Rachel Potter, Desk Officer,
Department of Education, Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street, NW., Room 10222, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503 or faxed to (202) 395–6974.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The IC Clearance
Official, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of
Management, publishes that notice
containing proposed information
collection requests prior to submission
of these requests to OMB. Each
proposed information collection,
grouped by office, contains the
following: (1) Type of review requested,
e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or
reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of
the collection; (4) Description of the
need for, and proposed use of, the
information; (5) Respondents and
frequency of collection; and (6)
Reporting and/or Recordkeeping
burden. OMB invites public comment.
DATES:
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Dated: May 15, 2006.
Angela C. Arrington,
IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of Management.
Institute of Education Sciences
Type of Review: New.
Title: Impact Evaluation on Student
Achievement of Teacher Professional
Development in Mathematics.
Frequency: On Occasion.
Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal
Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs; Individuals or
household.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:
Responses: 102.
Burden Hours: 51.
Abstract: Data collection to test a
model of math professional
development that addresses student
misconceptions in foundational topics
key to success in algebra and beyond.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
Requests for copies of the information
collection submission for OMB review
may be accessed from https://
edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the
‘‘Browse Pending Collections’’ link and
by clicking on link number 3003. When
you access the information collection,
click on ‘‘Download Attachments’’ to
view. Written requests for information
should be addressed to U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue,
SW., Potomac Center, 9th Floor,
Washington, DC 20202–4700. Requests
may also be electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202–
245–6623. Please specify the complete
title of the information collection when
making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or
the collection activity requirements
should be electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
[FR Doc. E6–7628 Filed 5–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
(1) Be accredited or preaccredited by
a nationally recognized accrediting
agency or association that the Secretary
has determined to be a reliable authority
as to the quality of education or training
offered;
(2) Be legally authorized by the State
in which it is located to be a junior
college or to provide an educational
program for which it awards a
bachelor’s degree;
(3) Be designated as an ‘‘eligible
institution’’ by demonstrating that it: (A)
has an enrollment of needy students as
described in 34 CFR 607.3; and (B) has
low average educational and general
expenditures per full-time equivalent
(FTE) undergraduate student as
described in 34 CFR 607.4; The Notice
Inviting Applications for Designation as
Eligible Institutions for FY 2006 was
published in the Federal Register on
December 16, 2005 (70 FR 74781). The
complete eligibility requirements for the
Title III, Part A Programs are in 34 CFR
607.2 through 607.5 and can be accessed
from the following Web site: https://
www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/
waisidx_05/34cfr607_05.html.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Postsecondary Education;
Overview Information; Strengthening
Institutions, American Indian Tribally
Controlled Colleges and Universities,
and Alaska Native and Native
Hawaiian-Serving Institutions
Programs; Notice Inviting Applications
for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY)
2006
Relationship Between the Title III, Part
A Programs and the Hispanic-Serving
Institutions (HSI) Program
Note 1: A grantee under the HSI Program,
which is authorized by Title V of the HEA,
may not receive a grant under any HEA, Title
III, Part A Program. Further, a current HSI
Program grantee may not give up its HSI
grant in order to receive a grant under any
Title III, Part A Program.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Numbers: 84.031A, 84.031T, 84.031N
and 84.031W.
Dates:
Applications Available: May 19, 2006.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: July 3, 2006.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: September 5, 2006.
Eligible Applicants: Institutions of
higher education (IHEs) that qualify as
eligible institutions under the
Strengthening Institutions Program
(SIP), American Indian Tribally
Controlled Colleges and Universities
(TCCU) Program, and Alaska Native and
Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions
(ANNH) Programs may apply for grants
under this notice. These programs are
authorized by Title III, Part A, of the
Higher Education Act of 1965, as
amended (HEA), and are known
collectively as the Title III, Part A
Programs. To qualify as an eligible
institution under any Title III, Part A
Program, an institution must, among
other requirements—
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Note 2: An eligible HSI that does not fall
within the limitation described in Note 1,
i.e., is not a current grantee under the HSI
Program, may apply for a FY 2006 grant
under all Title III, Part A Programs for which
it is eligible, as well as under the HSI
Program. However, a successful applicant
may receive only one grant.
Note 3: An eligible IHE that previously
received a five-year Individual Development
Grant under the SIP Program must wait for
two years after the date the five-year grant
ended, including any time extensions the
grant may have received, to apply for another
Individual Development Grant under the SIP
Program.
Note 4: An eligible IHE that submits more
than one application may be awarded only
one Individual Development Grant or one
Cooperative Arrangement Development Grant
in a fiscal year. Furthermore, we will not
award a second Cooperative Arrangement
Development Grant to an otherwise eligible
IHE for the same award year as the
institution’s existing Cooperative
Arrangement Development Grant award.
Estimated Available Funds:
$12,320,000 for new awards under SIP,
$16,605,000 for new awards under the
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29129-29130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7628]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
AGENCY: Department of Education.
SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management invites comments on the submission for
OMB review as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
[[Page 29130]]
DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before
June 19, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Rachel Potter, Desk
Officer, Department of Education, Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, NW., Room 10222, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503 or faxed to (202) 395-6974.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) provide interested Federal agencies and the public an
early opportunity to comment on information collection requests. OMB
may amend or waive the requirement for public consultation to the
extent that public participation in the approval process would defeat
the purpose of the information collection, violate State or Federal
law, or substantially interfere with any agency's ability to perform
its statutory obligations. The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory
Information Management Services, Office of Management, publishes that
notice containing proposed information collection requests prior to
submission of these requests to OMB. Each proposed information
collection, grouped by office, contains the following: (1) Type of
review requested, e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or
reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4)
Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the information; (5)
Respondents and frequency of collection; and (6) Reporting and/or
Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites public comment.
Dated: May 15, 2006.
Angela C. Arrington,
IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services,
Office of Management.
Institute of Education Sciences
Type of Review: New.
Title: Impact Evaluation on Student Achievement of Teacher
Professional Development in Mathematics.
Frequency: On Occasion.
Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal Gov't, SEAs or LEAs;
Individuals or household.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden:
Responses: 102.
Burden Hours: 51.
Abstract: Data collection to test a model of math professional
development that addresses student misconceptions in foundational
topics key to success in algebra and beyond.
Requests for copies of the information collection submission for
OMB review may be accessed from https://edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting
the ``Browse Pending Collections'' link and by clicking on link number
3003. When you access the information collection, click on ``Download
Attachments'' to view. Written requests for information should be
addressed to U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Potomac Center, 9th Floor, Washington, DC 20202-4700. Requests may also
be electronically mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202-245-
6623. Please specify the complete title of the information collection
when making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or the collection activity
requirements should be electronically mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov.
Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
[FR Doc. E6-7628 Filed 5-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
