Self-Employment for Adults and Youth With Disabilities Research and Technical Assistance; Solicitation for Cooperative Agreements, 29172-29182 [06-4669]

Agencies

• DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
• Office of Disability Employment Policy
• Disability Employment Policy Office

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29172-29182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-4669]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of Disability Employment Policy

[SGA 06-07]


Self-Employment for Adults and Youth With Disabilities Research 
and Technical Assistance; Solicitation for Cooperative Agreements

    Announcement Type: New notice of Availability of Funds and 
Solicitation for Grant Applications (SGA) for cooperative agreements 
for Self-Employment for Adults and Youth with Disabilities Research and 
Technical Assistance.
    Funding Opportunity Number: SGA 06-07.
    Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 17.720.
    Executive Summary: The U.S. Department of Labor (``DOL'' or 
``Department''), Office of Disability Employment Policy (``ODEP''), 
announces the availability of up to $5,000,000 to fund both a national 
technical assistance and research cooperative agreement, and multiple 
cooperative agreements for sub-national research and technical 
assistance pilot projects to investigate, develop and validate systems 
models likely to increase self-employment opportunities for people with 
disabilities.
     The national technical assistance and research cooperative 
agreement award will be funded for up to $1.5 million for a 36 month 
period of performance.
     The sub-national research and technical assistance pilot 
cooperative agreement award(s) will be funded for a total of up to $3.5 
million. Awards may range from $800,000-1,200,000, with an average of 
$1 million for a 36 month period of performance.
    ODEP'S unique mission is to provide national leadership by 
developing and influencing disability-related employment policy and 
practice affecting the employment of people with disabilities. Congress 
designated these monies to ODEP to further the development of self-
employment policy for individuals with disabilities. A critical element 
of this endeavor will be the generation of data and information to 
validate systems capacity-building strategies and systems change models 
for successfully increasing self-employment opportunities for 
individuals with disabilities, to document the systems-related 
difficulties and challenges that may be encountered, and to develop and 
test mechanisms for addressing these challenges. This data, obtained as 
a result of research and technical

[[Page 29173]]

assistance efforts, will be used by ODEP and other stakeholders in 
developing policy recommendations across multiple public and private 
systems for increased self-employment options as an alternative to more 
traditional types of employment.

DATES: Key Date: Applications must be received by July 3, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Applications must be mailed or hand-delivered to: U.S. 
Department of Labor, Procurement Services Center, Attention: Cassandra 
Mitchell, Reference SGA 06-07, Room N5416, 200 Constitution Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice contains all of the necessary 
information and forms needed to apply for the ODEP cooperative 
agreements described below. Additional forms can be obtained from the 
following Web site address: https://www.whitehouse.gov/OMB/grants/
forms.html
    Solicitation Information Conference Call: A Solicitation 
Information Conference Call will be held at 2 p.m. (ET), Wednesday, 
June 1, 2006. The purpose of this conference call is to provide 
interested parties an overview of this Cooperative Agreement program 
and an opportunity to ask questions concerning the solicitation. A 
transcript of the conference will be made available on the ODEP Web 
site, https://www.dol.gov/odep shortly following the conference. 
Individuals who wish to participate in this conference call must 
register by contacting ODEP at 202-693-7880, no later than 4:45 p.m. 
(ET) on Friday, May 26, 2006. Please ask to register for the Self 
Employment SGA Conference Call. Registrations should be made as soon as 
possible. At the time of registration, call-in information will be 
provided.

I. Funding Opportunity Description and Authority

A. Description and Purpose

    ODEP envisions two forms of research and technical assistance. ODEP 
will award multiple cooperative agreements to conduct research that 
will document and analyze existing agencies, policies and practices 
available to assist people with disabilities in starting and operating 
small businesses; identify, demonstrate, and evaluate innovative models 
across public and private systems for supporting self-employment for 
people with disabilities; assist relevant entities to implement 
effective and accessible practices for achieving self-employment 
outcomes of people with disabilities; and inform development of 
policies that expand access to such practices nationally.
Priority 1: National Self Employment Technical Assistance and Research 
Initiative
    ODEP intends to award one national research and technical 
assistance cooperative agreement for approximately $1.5 million for a 
period of performance of 36 months.
    This priority supports creation of a cooperative agreement to 
accomplish three tasks:
    (1) Provide direct technical assistance to the ODEP grantees 
described in Priority 2;
    (2) Provide technical assistance, training, dissemination and 
informational services to a broad constituency that will include state 
and local workforce development entities, including but not limited to, 
State Job Training Institutions, WIA One Stops, SBA Small Business 
Development Centers, the Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment 
Agencies of the Department of Veterans Affairs, State, and Tribal 
Vocational Rehabilitation Agencies to implement effective and 
accessible practices for achieving self-employment outcomes; and
    (3) Identify and analyze the effects of existing programs on 
entrepreneurship by people with disabilities.
    Task 1: Task 1 consists of providing assistance to grantees funded 
under Priority 2 of this solicitation based on the identified needs of 
each project. Assistance provided under this task will use strategies 
and information generated in Tasks 2 and 3 and additional assistance 
appropriate to the needs of the grantee, including site specific 
assistance.
    Task 2: This task will focus on developing and implementing a 
comprehensive strategy for increasing the capacity of existing systems 
for providing self-employment services to people with disabilities 
through training, technical assistance, research, and identification 
and dissemination of successful and recommended practices . This will 
include outreach to potential entrepreneurs with disabilities and to 
potential financial and lending institutions. Included in the training 
and technical assistance will be innovative strategies for fostering 
self-employment for individuals with disabilities and guidance about 
forming partnerships among agencies that have complementary expertise 
and resources. In addition, this task will establish sustainable 
resources for continued capacity building beyond the period of 
performance of the cooperative agreement.
    Task 3: Task 3 will be nationwide research and analysis of current 
resources and supports available to persons with disabilities for 
pursuit of entrepreneurship, and as Congress directed, ``to undertake a 
thorough analysis of the structures currently in place that either 
promote or impede the expansion of business ownership in the disability 
community.'' Specifically, this research will:
    (a) Document existing public and private programs or activities 
that have the authority or responsibility for developing and supporting 
entrepreneurs with or without disabilities in starting, financing and 
managing a small business;
    (b) Analyze the abilities and limitations of these resources for 
serving people with disabilities; and
    (c) Develop recommendations for modifying or developing policies 
for reducing impediments and increasing the capacity of the resources, 
individually or collaboratively, to respond to the entrepreneurial 
training, financing and support needs of people with disabilities.
    Applicants will build in methods for evaluating the effects of 
their technical assistance, and develop criteria for identifying 
promising practices and mechanisms for documenting and analyzing policy 
related information. To the extent that surveys are included in the 
final research design, the grantee will be responsible for designing 
those surveys in conjunction with ODEP and working with ODEP to develop 
an OMB clearance package and ensuring appropriate clearances. Surveys 
may be mixed mode (mail, internet and phone) and should be designed to 
achieve an overall response rate of at least 80%.
Priority 2: Sub-National Projects of Systemic Innovation and Technical 
Assistance
    ODEP intends to award multiple cooperative agreements for projects 
of systemic innovation. ODEP anticipates awards will be in the range of 
$800,000-1,200,000, with an average of $1 million, for a 36 month 
period of performance. However, this does not preclude funding 
decisions above or below this amount, or funding a smaller or larger 
number of projects, based on the number and quality of submissions.
    Under this priority, ODEP intends to fund multiple projects that 
will research, test and evaluate innovative models of self-employment 
service delivery that can be adopted across the country. In addition, 
these projects will provide sub-national technical assistance (separate 
from and unrelated to Priority 1 technical assistance) supportive of 
their individual research efforts within a political or economic

[[Page 29174]]

jurisdiction, such as a state, metropolitan area, rural district or 
economic development zone, proposed by the Awardee. These jurisdictions 
will be chosen on characteristics established by the applicants but 
including the presence of numerous public and private programs, 
including but not limited to, State Job Training Institutions, WIA One-
Stops, SBA Small Business Development Centers, the Vocational 
Rehabilitation and Employment Agencies of the Department of Veterans 
Affairs, and State, and Tribal Vocational Rehabilitation Agencies, 
capable of supporting potential entrepreneurs with disabilities. The 
awardees will be expected to research, test and evaluate innovative 
systems models that will increase self-employment opportunities for 
entrepreneurs who represent a range of disabilities, ages and life 
circumstances.
    Critical components of this priority will include:
    (a) Detailed resource mapping of the selected jurisdiction, 
documenting existing public and private programs or activities in the 
local area of the project that have the authority or responsibility for 
developing and supporting entrepreneurs with or without disabilities in 
starting, financing and managing a small business;
    (b) Analyzing the abilities and limitations of these existing 
resources for serving people with disabilities;
    (c) Developing recommendations and providing technical assistance 
for modifying or developing policies for reducing impediments and 
increasing the capacity of the resources, individually or 
collaboratively, to respond to the entrepreneurial training, financing 
and support needs of people with disabilities; and
    (d) Developing, testing, evaluating, and disseminating innovative 
models within the area of jurisdiction of the proposed project.
    The resultant resource mapping, policy analysis, and innovative 
systems model development must address the needs of adults, youth, 
veterans and older workers with disabilities (including those with 
significant physical, mental health and cognitive disabilities) who 
desire entrepreneurship. It must also include generic programs 
available to all potential entrepreneurs as well as those targeted 
specifically to people with disabilities, and a review of relevant 
regulations, policies, practices and funding mechanisms. Any 
differences between rural and urban entrepreneurship must be addressed.
    Outcomes for this priority will be quantitative and qualitative 
documentation of the model(s), including:
    (a) Strengths and weaknesses for assisting people with 
disabilities;
    (b) Recommendations for informing policy development and addressing 
barriers and facilitators to achieving desired results; and
    (c) Identification and dissemination through technical assistance 
of promising and successful practices.
    This information will be used by ODEP, in concert with other 
Federal agencies, to develop and implement an action plan to promote 
self-employment and small business development among youth and adults 
with disabilities, particularly those with the most significant 
disabilities.

B. Background

    Congress provided $5,000,000 in the FY 2006 appropriation for ODEP 
to conduct a national initiative to develop research-based policy and 
provide technical assistance to related systems in implementing 
effective and accessible practices for achieving sustainable self-
employment outcomes for individuals with disabilities. (See Departments 
of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related 
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006, Public Law 109-149, Title I, 119 
Stat. 2833, 2841 (2005); H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 109-300, at 59 (2005); S. 
Rep. No. 109-103, at 26 (2005)). Through this initiative, ODEP intends 
to increase the knowledge base of existing practices for serving the 
self-employment training and financing needs of individuals with 
disabilities, and to identify, investigate and validate systems models 
likely to increase self-employment opportunities for people with 
disabilities.
    The Office of Disability Employment Policy (ODEP) provides national 
leadership by developing and influencing disability-related employment 
policies and practices. A five-year strategic plan guides ODEP in 
achieving its mission by identifying long-term strategic and outcome 
goals as well as shorter-term intermediate and performance goals. In 
addition to measuring agency performance, as required by the Government 
Performance and Results Act (GPRA), the strategic plan sets forth a 
road map for prioritizing the formulation and dissemination of 
innovative employment policies and practices to service delivery 
systems and employers.
    ODEP's annual goal is to build knowledge and advance disability 
employment policy that affects and promotes systems change. The 
agency's long- and short-term goals focus efforts on initiatives that 
bring about this level of change. In short, ODEP develops policies and 
strategies that will:
     Enhance the capacity of service delivery systems to 
provide appropriate and effective services and supports to youth and 
adults with disabilities;
     Increase planning and coordination within service delivery 
systems to develop and improve systems, processes, and services;
     Improve individualization of services to better assist 
youth and adults with disabilities in seeking, obtaining, and retaining 
employment or self-employment;
     Increase employer access to supports and services to meet 
their employment needs;
     Increase the quality of competency-based training for 
service delivery systems;
     Increase the adoption of universal strategies for service 
provision; and
     Develop partnerships with and among critical stakeholders 
to effectively leverage available resources and facilitate 
implementation of practices and policies that increase employment and 
self-employment opportunities and the recruitment, retention, and 
promotion of youth and adults with disabilities.
    Three measures inform ODEP's annual progress: The number of policy-
related documents; the number of formal agreements; and the number of 
effective practices. These performance results support achievement of 
the following intermediate outcome goals: Accessible employment 
resources; coordinated programs, processes, and services; and adoption 
of effective practices.
    Achievement of these intermediate outcome goals, in turn, supports 
achievement of the long-term service delivery systems outcome goals, 
which are marked by increases in these areas: Capacity of service 
delivery systems; planning and coordination within service delivery 
systems; and employer access to supports and services for recruitment, 
retention, and promotion.
    ODEP is committed to supporting and encouraging the creative use of 
alternative employment strategies, such as self-employment, through 
appropriate skills development, entrepreneurial education, training 
opportunities, access to funding and necessary supports, and capacity 
building within systems to ensure availability of self employment 
outcomes for individuals with disabilities.
    People with disabilities who choose entrepreneurship as their path 
to

[[Page 29175]]

financial independence have historically been underserved both by the 
agencies that specifically serve people with disabilities and those 
that serve potential entrepreneurs who are members of the general 
public. While facing the same obstacles as entrepreneurs who do not 
have disabilities, entrepreneurs with disabilities must resolve 
additional issues that result from their disabilities.
    Government programs and private agencies have begun a groundswell 
of support for encouraging people with disabilities to consider 
entrepreneurship as a career option and for providing the technical and 
financial assistance they need. The most recent amendments to the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Title V of the Workforce Investment Act of 
1998) reemphasize the use of self-employment or small business 
ownership as legitimate employment outcomes for vocational 
rehabilitation clients. The Social Security Administration (SSA), which 
under the new Ticket to Work Program has begun issuing ``tickets'' to 
beneficiaries and recipients of its cash benefit programs, has included 
the support of an individual's entrepreneurial goals as a possible use 
of the ticket. SSA's PASS (Plans for Achieving Self-Support) program 
provides a way for SSI (Supplemental Security Income) recipients to 
accumulate funds necessary for business start-ups and operation without 
jeopardizing the individual's cash benefits or health care coverage. 
Across the Federal government, personal budget and asset-building 
programs such as Individual Development Accounts, economic development 
programs and housing programs are creating new opportunities for 
entrepreneurs with disabilities. ODEP's Customized Employment and 
WorkFORCE (Working for Freedom, Opportunity and Real Choice Through 
Community Employment) Action grant initiatives are demonstrating the 
feasibility of self-employment as an option for individuals with 
significant disabilities who were previously considered by some systems 
to be unemployable.
    Across the country, private and public programs are successfully 
assisting people with disabilities to become competitive members of the 
small business community. Small business development centers and 
microenterprise agencies have begun to open their doors to people with 
disabilities. Innovative customized approaches to entrepreneurship such 
as supported self-employment, use of cooperatives and development of 
micro-boards show great potential but are little understood. Available 
strategies to assist individuals with disabilities to develop assets to 
further self-employment appear to be underutilized. Strategies for 
leveraging resources across multiple systems are impeded by funding 
restrictions and bureaucratic inertia.
    Numerous Federal agencies and private entities are potential 
resources for individuals with disabilities, such as education 
agencies, state job training institutions, Workforce Investment Act 
One-Stop Career Centers, Small Business Administration-sponsored Small 
Business Development Centers, the vocational rehabilitation and 
employment services of the Departments of Veterans Affairs, and State 
and tribal vocational rehabilitation agencies, and other related 
programs. Agencies that serve the employment needs of youth and adults 
with disabilities, however, regularly report that their staff members 
are not knowledgeable about small business procedures or resources. At 
the same time, organizations that support small business development 
report a lack of knowledge about how to serve people with disabilities 
or what resources might be available to help those individuals. Very 
little research on people with disabilities and self-employment exists, 
leaving many questions unanswered for policy makers.
    ODEP recognizes that creating successful self-employment models for 
people with disabilities may necessitate changes to the systems in 
place for promoting small business ownership or for responding to the 
complex needs of individuals with disabilities. Information from ODEP 
grant initiatives has identified the following critical elements for 
achieving enduring systems change:
    (1) Increase the capacity of system elements to achieve a goal 
through staff training, modifications to policies and practices, and 
improved facility accessibility;
    (2) Increase the coordination and collaboration between multiple 
agencies to maximize the use and effectiveness of services and 
financial resources;
    (3) Customize services to better fulfill the unique needs of each 
individual;
    (4) Implement and evaluate new and different practices;
    (5) Disseminate information regarding successful changes and 
lessons learned to others who might benefit; and
    (6) Ensure that successful changes are institutionalized so that 
they will endure.

C. Definitions

    Definitions for purposes of this solicitation include:
     ``Self-employment'' means work by a person who owns or 
operates a trade, business or profession, either by themselves or with 
other owners.
     ``Youth with disabilities'' refers to individuals who are 
ages 14 to 24.
     ``Significant disability'' is defined as an individual 
with a disability who is receiving Social Security or Supplemental 
Security Income disability benefits.

II. Award Information

    Estimated Available Funds: $5,000,000.
    Priority I: One Award: up to $1,500,000.
    Priority II: Multiple Awards: range from $800,000--$1,200,000 
(Average size of awards approximately $1,000,000).
    Period of Performance: 36 months from date of award.
    The U.S. Department of Labor (``DOL'' or ``Department''), Office of 
Disability Employment Policy (``ODEP''), announces the availability of 
up to $5,000,000 to fund :
    (1) A national technical assistance and research cooperative 
agreement, and
    (2) Multiple sub-national cooperative agreements for research and 
technical assistance pilot projects to identify, investigate and 
validate innovative systems models likely to increase self-employment 
opportunities for people with disabilities.


    Note: Selection of an organization as a Grantee does not 
constitute approval of the grant application as submitted. Before 
the actual grant is awarded, USDOL may enter into negotiations about 
such items as program components, staffing and funding levels, and 
administrative systems in place to support grant implementation. If 
the negotiations do not result in a mutually acceptable submission, 
the Grant Officer reserves the right to terminate the negotiation 
and decline to fund the application.


    Because ODEP plans to make awards in the form of a cooperative 
agreement, USDOL will have substantial involvement in the 
administration of the agreement. Such USDOL involvement will consist 
of:
    (1) Approval of any sub-contract awarded by the grantee(s);
    (2) Participation in site visits to project areas;
    (3) Providing advice and consultation to the Grantee(s) on specific 
program criteria;
    (4) Providing the Grantee(s) with technical and programmatic 
support,

[[Page 29176]]

including training in USDOL monitoring and evaluation systems, and 
standard procedures regarding USDOL management of cooperative 
agreements;
    (5) Reviewing, at reasonable times, all documents pertaining to the 
project, including status and technical progress reports, and financial 
reports;
    (6) Discussing administrative and technical issues pertaining to 
the project;
    (7) Approving all key personnel decisions, and sub-contractors or 
sub-recipients;
    (8) Approving all press releases and publicity materials regarding 
the project;
    (9) Approving all content for online resources developed through 
project activities, including clearing concepts for material production 
and final document production; and
    (10) Drafting terms of reference for, and participating in project 
evaluations.

III. Eligibility Information

1. Eligible Applicants

    Applications for Priority 1 will be accepted from both for profit 
and not-for-profit entities or from consortia of such entities, which 
include but are not limited to, institutions of higher education 
(including state institutions) and faith-based and community 
organizations, all of whom have demonstrated national experience in:
    (a) Employment, self-employment and disability research and 
demonstration activities;
    (b) Providing technical assistance on a range of topics necessary 
to achieve self-employment for people with disabilities; and
    (c) Demonstrated knowledge of and technical assistance experience 
working with state or local systems to promote systems change; and
    In accordance with the supporting legislative language for this 
effort which states:

    ``The Committee directs that, in making the national technical 
assistance grant, priority be given to national non-profits with 
experience in delivering direct consumer services as well as 
training to public and private agencies,'' an additional five (5) 
evaluation points will be given to such lead applicants. For further 
information, see Part V, Application Review Information, Item 1. 
Evaluation Criteria.''

    If the applicant is a consortium, the lead for profit or non-profit 
entity will be the recipient of the award and must be the responsible 
financial and administrative entity for the Cooperative Agreement 
should that application result in an award.
    Applications for Priority 2 will be accepted from consortia led by 
state or local government agencies. The consortium members may include 
public and private entities, which may include but are not limited to 
non-profit organizations, institutions of higher education, and faith-
based and community organizations. The lead government agency will be 
the recipient of the award and must be the responsible financial and 
administrative entity for the Cooperative Agreement should that 
application result in an award.
    According to section 18 of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, an 
organization, as described in section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986, that engages in lobbying activities will not be eligible 
for the receipt of Federal funds constituting an award, grant, or loan. 
See 2 U.S.C. 1611; 26 U.S.C. 501(c) (4). Funding restrictions apply. 
See Section IV (5).

2. Cost Sharing

    Cost sharing, matching funds, and cost participation are not 
required under this SGA. However, leveraging of public and private 
resources to achieve project sustainability is highly encouraged and 
included under evaluation criteria B.

3. Other Eligibility Requirements

    Legal rules pertaining to inherently religious activities by 
organizations that receive Federal Financial Assistance:
    Neutral, non-religious criteria that neither favor nor disfavor 
religion will be employed in the selection of grant recipients and must 
be employed by grantees or in the selection of sub-recipients.
    The government is generally prohibited from providing direct 
financial assistance for inherently religious activities.\1\ These 
grants may not be used for religious instruction, worship, prayer, 
proselytizing or other inherently religious activities. Neutral, non-
religious criteria that neither favor nor disfavor religion must be 
employed in the selection of grant recipients and sub-recipients.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In this context, the term direct financial assistance means 
financial assistance that is provided directly by a government 
entity or an intermediate organization, as opposed to financial 
assistance that an organization receives as the result of the 
genuine and independent private choice of a beneficiary. In other 
contexts, the term ``direct'' financial assistance may be used to 
refer to financial assistance that an organization receives directly 
from the Federal government (also known as ``discretionary'' 
assistance), as opposed to assistance that it receives from a State 
or local government (also known as ``indirect'' or ``block'' grant 
assistance). The term ``direct'' has the former meaning throughout 
this SGA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Application and Submission Information

1. Addresses To Request Application Package

    This SGA contains all the information and forms needed to apply for 
this grant funding. Application announcements or forms will not be 
mailed. The Federal Register may be obtained from your nearest 
government office or library. In addition, a copy of this notice and 
the application requirements may be downloaded from ODEP's Web site at 
https://www.dol.gov/odep and at https://www.grants.gov. If additional 
copies of the standard forms are needed, they can also be downloaded 
from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/grants_forms.html.

2. Content and Form of Application Submission

    General Requirements: Applicants must submit one (1) paper copy 
with an original signature, and two (2) additional paper copies of the 
signed proposal. To aid with the review of applications, DOL also 
requests applicants to submit an electronic copy of their proposal's 
Sections II (Executive Summary) and III (Project Narrative) on disc or 
Compact Disc (CD) using Microsoft Word. The application (not to exceed 
50 pages for Section III), must be double-spaced with standard one-inch 
margins (top, bottom, and sides) on 8\1/2\ x 11-inch paper, and must be 
presented on single-sided and numbered pages. A font size of at least 
twelve (12) pitch is required throughout. All text in the application 
narrative, including titles, headings, footnotes, quotations, and 
captions must be double-spaced (no more than three lines per vertical 
inch); and, if using a proportional computer font, must be in at least 
a 12-point font, and must have an average character density no greater 
than 18 characters per inch (if using a non-proportional font or a 
typewriter, must not be more than 12 characters per inch). Applications 
that fail to meet these requirements will be considered non-responsive.
Cooperative Agreement Mandatory Application Requirements
    The three required sections of the application are titled below and 
described thereafter:
Section I--Project Financial Plan (No page limit).
Section II--Executive Summary--Project Synopsis (Not to exceed two (2) 
pages).
Section III--Project Narrative (Not to exceed 50 pages).
    The mandatory requirements for each section are set forth below. 
Applications

[[Page 29177]]

that fail to meet the stated mandatory requirements for each section 
will be considered non-responsive.
    Section I. Project Financial Plan (Budget): The Project Financial 
Plan will not count against the application page limits. Section I of 
the application must include the following three required parts:
    (1) Completed ``SF-424--Application for Federal Assistance.'' 
Please note that, beginning October 1, 2003, all applicants for federal 
grant and funding opportunities are required to include a Dun and 
Bradstreet (DUNS) number with their application. See OMB Notice of 
Final Policy Issuance, 68 Fed. Reg. 38402 (June 27, 2003). The DUNS 
number is a nine-digit identification number that uniquely identifies 
business entities. There is no charge for obtaining a DUNS number 
(although it may take 14-30 days). To obtain a DUNS number, access the 
following Web site: https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Requests for exemption from the DUNS number requirement must be 
made to OMB. The Dun and Bradstreet Number of the applicant should be 
entered in the ``Organizational Unit'' section of block 5 of the SF 
424. (See Appendix A of this SGA for required form).
    (2) Completed SF-424 A--Budget Information Form by line item for 
all costs required to implement the project design effectively. (See 
Appendix B of this SGA for required forms).
    (3) DOL Budget Narrative and Justification that provides sufficient 
information to support the reasonableness of the costs included in the 
budget in relation to the service strategy and planned outcomes, 
including continuous improvement activities.
    The SF-424 must contain the original signatures of the legal entity 
applying for Cooperative Agreement funding and two additional copies. 
The individual signing the SF-424 on behalf of the applicant must 
represent and be able to legally bind the responsible financial and 
administrative entity for a Cooperative Agreement should that 
application result in an award. Applicants shall indicate on the SF-424 
the organization's Internal Revenue Service (IRS) status (e.g., 
501(c)(3) organization), if applicable.
    The DOL Budget Narrative and Justification must describe all costs 
associated with implementing the project that are to be covered with 
Cooperative Agreement funds. The budget must support the travel and 
associated costs of sending at least one representative to periodic 
meetings with DOL staff in Washington, DC (at least once per quarter), 
at a time and place to be determined. In addition to other 
administrative requirements identified in section VI (2) of this SGA, 
the applicant must comply with the ``Uniform Administrative 
Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local 
Governments' (also known as OMB Circular A-102), codified at 29 CFR 
part 97, or ``Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher 
Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations'' (also known 
as the ``Common Rule'' or OMB Circular A-110), codified at 2 CFR part 
215 and 29 CFR part 95.
    In addition, the budget submitted for review by DOL must include, 
on a separate page, a detailed cost analysis of each line item. The 
costs listed in the detailed cost analysis must comply with the 
applicable OMB cost principles circulars, as identified in 29 CFR 95.27 
and 29 CFR 97.22(b). Justification for administrative costs must be 
provided. Approval of a budget by DOL is not the same as the approval 
of actual costs. The applicant must also include the Assurances and 
Certifications Signature Page (Appendix C) and the Survey on Ensuring 
Equal Opportunity for Applicants (Appendix D).
    Section II. Executive Summary--Project Synopsis: The Executive 
Summary is limited to no more than two single-spaced, single-sided 
pages on 8\1/2\ x 11-inch paper with standard margins throughout. The 
project synopsis must identify the following:
    (1) The lead entity;
    (2) The planned period of performance;
    (3) The list of consortium members, as appropriate; and
    (4) An overview of how the applicant will conduct the research, 
analyze the data, and present the findings associated with the priority 
targeted by their application.
    Section III. Project Narrative: The DOL Cooperative Agreement 
Project Narrative is limited to no more than fifty (50), 8\1/2\ x 11 
pages, double-spaced with standard one-inch margins (top, bottom, and 
sides), and must be presented on single-sided, numbered pages.

    Note: Any Appendices, including letters of cooperation, resumes, 
etc., are not included in this fifty-page limit.

    Successful applicants will develop and describe in their Project 
Narrative innovative and comprehensive plans for accomplishing the 
tasks described for Priority 1 and Priority 2 as detailed below. 
Direction for all applicants is included thereafter.
    1. Priority 1 applicants: Applications for Priority 1 must include:
    a. Documentation (such as letters of intent and memorandum of 
agreement from proposed consortium members, consultants and other key 
entities) which reflects that each entity or individual is committed to 
participating and working cooperatively with the applicant, shall be 
included in the Appendix;
    b. A description of the procedures and approaches the applicant 
will use to identify and respond to the technical assistance and 
training needs of the entity(ies) providing services to potential 
entrepreneurs with disabilities;
    c. A description of the procedures and approaches that will be used 
to ensure that the target agencies receive the assistance that provides 
them with the specific skills and information needed for serving people 
with disabilities and accomplishing the goals of the proposed project;
    d. A detailed description of how the applicant will document and 
analyze existing self-employment related programs;
    e. A description of the methods used to ensure that the elements of 
the project's technical assistance model will be sustained following 
the completion of project activities; and
    f. A detailed description of procedures and materials that will 
enable others to adopt the successful models developed.
    2. Priority 2 applicants: Applications for Priority 2 must include:
    a. Documentation (such as letters of intent and memorandum of 
agreement from relevant state and local public and private agencies and 
entities, consultants and other key entities) which reflects that each 
agency and entity to be included in the demonstration project is 
committed to participating and working cooperatively with the 
applicant, shall be included in the Appendix;
    b. A description of the procedures and approaches that will be used 
to identify and evaluate systems models that integrate services for 
people with disabilities into the existing infrastructure of any 
organizations currently providing self-employment training or financing 
within the jurisdiction of the project;
    c. A description of the self-employment systems models to be tested 
and evaluated for effectiveness, including whether they ensure customer 
choice and self-direction of funds;
    d. A description of the criteria and methods to be used to select 
the project's political or economic jurisdiction;

[[Page 29178]]

    e. A description of the methods to be used to ensure that the 
elements of the project's system model will be sustained following the 
completion of project activities; and
    f. A detailed description of procedures and materials that will 
enable others to adopt the successful models developed through 
technical assistance and other means.
    3. All applicants: a. Must describe the methods and procedures for 
collecting, analyzing, and reporting data from the evaluation of the 
project;
    b. Must describe the procedures and approaches for working with 
multiple Federal, state and local public and private agencies to 
implement the various policy recommendations and strategies proposed in 
relation to the specific situation in each agency;
    c. May apply for an award in each priority category, but a separate 
application must be submitted for each priority, and for each separate 
jurisdiction under Priority 2. Awards will be made independently for 
each of the priorities described in this SGA; and
    d. Must include:
    (1) A detailed 36-month management plan for project goals, 
objectives, and activities;
    (2) A detailed 36-month timeline for project activities including 
producing and submitting a final report;
    (3) A detailed outline for an evaluation research design (see 
Section V (1) (F) for more information);
    (4) A description of procedures and approaches that will be used to 
provide ongoing communication and collaboration with, and input from 
ODEP's Project Officer on all grant-related activities;
    (5) A description of how performance feedback and continuous 
improvement are integral to the design of the project; and
    (6) Information on proposed staffing consistent with the 
requirements below.
    The Project Narrative must describe the proposed staffing of the 
project, including consultants, and must identify and summarize the 
qualifications of the personnel who will carry it out as well as time 
commitments of all staff and consultants. For each staff person named 
in the application, please provide documentation of all internal and 
external time commitments. In instances where a staff person is 
committed on a Federally supported project, please provide the project 
name, Federal office, program title, the project Federal award number, 
and the amount of committed time by each project year. This information 
(e.g., Staff: Jane Doe; Project Name: Succeeding in the General 
Curriculum; Federal office: Office of Special Education Programs; 
Program title: Field Initiated Research; Award number: H324C980624; 
Time commitments: Year 1--30%; Year 2--25% and Year 3--40%) can be 
provided as an Appendix to the application.
    In general, ODEP will not reduce time commitments on currently 
funded grants from the time proposed in the original application. 
Therefore, ODEP will not consider for funding any application where key 
staff are bid above a time commitment level that staff have available 
to bid. Further, the time commitments stated in newly submitted 
applications will not be negotiated down to permit the applicant to 
receive a new grant award.
    The Project Narrative should also describe how the applicant plans 
to comply with the employment discrimination and equal employment 
opportunity requirements of the various laws listed in the assurances 
section.
    In addition, the evaluation criteria listed in Section V (1) 
include consideration of the qualifications, including relevant 
education, training and experience, of key project personnel as well as 
the qualifications, including relevant training and experience, of 
project consultants or subcontractors. Resumes for all staff and 
consultants must be included in the Appendices.

3. Submission Dates, Times and Addresses

    Applications will be accepted commencing May 19, 2006. The closing 
date for receipt of applications by DOL under this announcement is July 
3, 2006.
    Applications, including those hand-delivered, must be received by 
4:45 p.m. (ET) on the closing date at the address specified below. No 
exceptions to the mailing and hand-delivery conditions set forth in 
this notice will be granted. Applications that do not meet the 
conditions set forth in this notice will be considered non-responsive.
    Applications must be mailed or hand-delivered to: U.S. Department 
of Labor, Procurement Services Center, Attention: Cassandra Mitchell, 
Reference SGA 06-07, Room N-5416, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20210. Applications sent by e-mail or telefascimile 
(FAX) applications will not be accepted.
    Hand-Delivered Proposals: It is preferred that applications be 
mailed at least five (5) days prior to the closing date to ensure 
timely receipt. Hand-delivered applications will be considered for 
funding, but must be received by the above specified date and time. 
Overnight or express delivery from carriers other than the U.S. Postal 
Service will be considered hand-delivered applications. Failure to 
adhere to the above instructions will serve as a basis for a 
determination of non-responsiveness.
    Applicants are advised that mail in the Washington DC area may be 
delayed due to mail decontamination procedures and may wish to take 
this information into consideration when preparing to meet the 
application deadline.
    Late Applications. Any application received by the designated 
office after the exact date and time specified will be considered non-
responsive, unless it is received before awards are made and it: (a) Is 
determined that its late receipt was caused by DOL error after timely 
delivery to the Department of Labor; (b) was sent by U.S. Postal 
Service registered or certified mail not later than the fifth calendar 
day before the date specified for receipt of applications (e.g., an 
application submitted in response to a solicitation requiring receipt 
of applications by the 20th of the month must have been post marked by 
the 15th of that month); or (c) was sent by the U.S. Postal Service 
Express Mail Next Day Service to addressee not later than 5 p.m. at the 
place of mailing two (2) working days prior to the date specified for 
receipt of applications. The term ``working days'' excludes weekends 
and Federal holidays. ``Postmarked'' means a printed, stamped, or 
otherwise placed impression (exclusive of a postage meter machine 
impression) that is readily identifiable without further action as 
having been supplied or affixed on the date of mailing by an employee 
of the U.S. Postal Service.
    Withdrawal of Applications: An application that is timely submitted 
may be withdrawn by written notice or telegram (including mailgram) at 
any time before an award is made. Applications may be withdrawn in 
person by the applicant or by an authorized representative thereof, if 
the representative's identity is made known and the representative 
signs a receipt for the proposal.

4. Intergovernmental Review

    This funding opportunity is not subject to Executive Order 12372, 
``Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs.''

5. Funding Restrictions

    (a) Funding Levels: The total funding available for this 
solicitation is $5,000,000. The Department of Labor reserves the right 
to negotiate the amounts to be awarded under this competition. Please 
be advised that

[[Page 29179]]

requests exceeding the maximum stated amount for each Priority in the 
Executive Summary section of this solicitation will be considered non-
responsive. Additionally, there will be no reimbursement of pre-award 
costs.
    (b) Period of Performance: The period of performance will be for 36 
months from date of the award unless modified. It is expected that the 
successful applicant(s) will begin program operations under this 
solicitation immediately upon receiving the ``Notice of Award.''
    (c) Option Year Funding: Not applicable.
    (d) Indirect Charges: If indirect charges are claimed in the 
proposed budget, the recipient must provide on a separate sheet, the 
following information:
    (1) Name and address of cognizant Federal Audit Agency;
    (2) Name, address and phone number (including area code) of the 
Government auditor;
    (3) Documentation from the cognizant agency indicating:
    (a) Current indirect cost rate and the base against which the rate 
should be applied;
    (b) Effective period (dates) for the rate; and
    (c) Date last rate was computed and negotiated;
    (4) If no government audit agency computed and authorized the rate 
claimed, a proposed rate with justification may be submitted to provide 
a brief explanation of computation, who computed and the date; 
successful applicants will be required to negotiate an acceptable and 
allowable rate within 90 days of grant award with the appropriate DOL 
Regional Office of Cost Determination or with the applicant's cognizant 
agency for indirect cost rates (See Office of Management and Budget Web 
site at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/attach.html). The 
recipient shall call the Office of Cost Determination at 202-693-4100 
for the initial contact.
    However, applications claiming an indirect cost rate greater than 
15% will not be considered.

V. Application Review Information

1. Evaluation Criteria

    A Technical Panel will review grant applications against the 
criteria listed below, on the basis of the maximum points indicated. 
``In accordance with Part III of this SGA, Eligibility Information, 
Item 1, entitled Eligible Applicants, sub-item (d), regarding 
legislative language-driven priority directions for the national 
technical assistance grant (i.e. Priority 1), an additional five (5) 
scoring points will be given to applicants who are ``national non-
profits with experience in delivering direct consumer services as well 
as training to public and private agencies''.
A. Significance of the Proposed Project (10 Points)
    In determining the significance of the proposed research, the 
Department will consider the following factors.

For all Priority areas:
    (1) The potential contribution of the proposed project to increase 
knowledge or understanding of problems, issues, or effective strategies 
for providing self-employment options to adults and youth with 
disabilities, including significant disabilities, as an alternative to 
traditional types of employment;
    (2) The extent to which the proposed project is likely to yield 
findings that may be used by other appropriate agencies and 
organizations; and
    (3) The likely utility of the products (such as information, 
materials, processes, or techniques) that will result from the proposed 
project, including their potential for being used effectively in a 
variety of other settings.

Additional Factors for Priority 2:
    (1) The extent to which the proposed research identifies promising 
new strategies that build upon, or are alternatives to, existing 
strategies;
    (2) The extent to which the promising practices of the proposed 
project are to be disseminated and shared through technical assistance 
in ways that will enable others to use the information or strategies;
    (3) The potential replicability (national significance) of the 
proposed project or strategies, including, as appropriate, the 
potential for implementation in a variety of settings;
    (4) The extent to which the proposed project is likely to build 
sustainable capacity in the area of jurisdiction to provide, improve or 
expand self-employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities; 
and
    (5) The importance or magnitude of the results that are likely to 
be attained by the proposed project.
B. Project Design (25 Points)
    In evaluating the quality of the proposed project design, the 
Department will consider the following factors.

For all Priority areas:
    (1) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be 
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable;
    (2) The extent to which the proposal incorporates the key 
activities identified for the appropriate priority in the Project 
Narrative section of this SGA (section IV(2));
    (3) The extent to which the proposal describes a strategic process 
for designing and implementing the project;
    (4) The extent to which the design of the proposed project is 
appropriate to, and will successfully address the needs of, all people 
with disabilities, including adults, youth, veterans, older workers and 
persons with significant disabilities;
    (5) The extent to which the design of the proposed project reflects 
a review of disability-related literature, up-to-date knowledge of 
research and effective practices relating to planning, financing and 
implementing self-employment options, an in-depth understanding of 
relevant economic, social, financial, institutional or other problems 
and the use of appropriate methodological tools to ensure successful 
achievement of project objectives;
    (6) The extent to which the design of the proposed project can 
identify barriers and challenges associated with providing self-
employment options to persons with disabilities;
    (7) The extent to which the proposed project will effectively 
contribute to increased knowledge and understanding by building upon 
current theory, research, and best practices.
    (8) The extent to which the applicant encourages involvement of 
people with disabilities, relevant experts, and organizations in 
project activities;
    (9) The extent to which performance feedback and continuous 
improvement are integral to the design of the proposed project; and
    (10) The adequacy of the documentation submitted in support of the 
proposed project to demonstrate the commitment of each entity or 
individual included in project implementation.

Additional Factors for Priority 2:
    (1) The extent to which the proposed project is designed to build 
systemic capacity and yield results that will extend beyond the period 
of performance of the cooperative agreement;
    (2) The extent to which the design of the proposed project utilizes 
cutting-edge strategies for promoting personal choice and control in 
the development of self-employment options; and
    (3) The extent to which the proposed project leverages a 
combination of public and private resources for purposes of 
sustainability and provides other concrete evidence of sustainability, 
including appropriate letters of support included in the Appendices.

[[Page 29180]]

C. Organizational Capacity and Quality of Key Personnel (25 points)
    Applications will be evaluated based on the extent to which the 
applicant demonstrates organizational capacity and quality of key 
personnel to implement the proposed project, including:
    (1) Demonstrated experience with similar projects in employment or 
self-employment and related areas for the appropriate Priority area, as 
well as in providing services related to self-employment for people 
with disabilities;
    (2) Experience with the target population;
    (3) Qualifications and experience of the applicant's key personnel 
and consultants;
    (4) Commitment to developing and sustaining work across key 
stakeholders;
    (5) Experience and commitment of any proposed consultants or 
subcontractors; and
    (6) Appropriateness of the organization's structure to carry out 
the project.
D. Budget and Resource Capacity (10 points)
    In evaluating the capacity of the applicant to carry out the 
proposed project, ODEP will consider the following factors:
    (1) The extent to which the budget is adequate to support the 
proposed project; and
    (2) The extent to which the anticipated costs are reasonable in 
relation to the objectives, design, and potential significance of the 
proposed project.
E. Quality of the Management Plan (15 points)
    In evaluating the quality of the management plan for the proposed 
project, ODEP will consider the following factors:
    (1) The extent to which the management plan for project 
implementation appears likely to achieve the objectives of the proposed 
project on time and within budget, and includes clearly defined staff 
responsibilities, time allocation to project activities, time lines, 
milestones for accomplishing project tasks, project deliverables and 
information on adequacy of other resources necessary for project 
implementation;
    (2) The extent to which the management plan appears likely to 
result in sustaining activities beyond the period of direct federal 
investment;
    (3) The adequacy of mechanisms for ensuring high-quality products 
and services relating to the scope of work for the proposed project; 
and
    (4) The extent to which the time commitments of the project 
director and/or principal investigator and other key project personnel 
are appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed 
project.
F. Quality of the Project Evaluation (15 points)
    In evaluating the quality of the project's evaluation design, ODEP 
will consider the following factors:
    (1) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough, 
feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, context, and 
outcomes of the proposed project;
    (2) The extent to which the design of the evaluation includes the 
use of objective performance measures and methods that will clearly 
document the project's intended outputs and outcomes and will produce 
quantitative and qualitative data;
    (3) The extent to which the evaluation will include methods to 
validate self-employment strategies and document systems change models 
in order to provide information to the Federal government and other 
entities about effective self-employment and systems change strategies 
suitable for replication or testing in other settings; and
    (4) The extent to which the methods of evaluation provide measures 
that will inform ODEP's annual performance goals and measures and 
ODEP's long-term strategic goals.

2. Review and Selection Process

    A technical review panel will objectively rate each complete 
application against the criteria described in this SGA for the 
appropriate priority as identified in the application. Each application 
will only be rated for one of the priorities. Multiple applications 
must be submitted if an applicant seeks funding under more than one 
priority. The panel recommendations to the Grant Officer, including any 
point scores, are advisory in nature. The Grant Officer may elect to 
award grants either with or without discussion with the applicant. In 
situations where no discussion occurs, an award will be based on the 
signed SF-424 form (see Appendix A), which constitutes a binding offer.
    The Grant Officer may consider the availability of funds and any 
information that is available and will make final award decisions based 
on what is most advantageous to the government, considering factors 
such as: The advisory recommendations from the grant technical 
evaluation panel, and the geographic distribution of Federally funded 
grants.

3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates

    Announcement of this award is expected to occur within 30 days of 
award. The cooperative agreement will be awarded by no later than 
September 30, 2006.

VI. Award Administration Information

1. Award Notices

    The Notice of Award signed by the Grant Officer is the authorizing 
document and will be provided through postal mail and/or by electronic 
means to the authorized representative listed on the SF-424 Grant 
Application. Notice that an organization has been selected as a grant 
recipient does not constitute final approval of the grant application 
as submitted. Before the actual grant award, the Grant Officer and/or 
the Grant Officer's Technical Representative may enter into 
negotiations concerning such items as program components, funding 
levels, and administrative systems. If the negotiations do not result 
in an acceptable submittal, the Grant Officer reserves the right to 
terminate the negotiation and decline to fund the proposal.

2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements

    All grantees, including faith-based organizations, will be subject 
to applicable Federal laws (including provisions of appropriations 
law), regulations, and the applicable Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) Circulars. The grant(s) awarded under this SGA will be subject to 
the following administrative standards and provisions, and requirements 
applicable to particular entities. The applicant must include 
assurances and certifications that it will comply with these laws in 
its grant application. The assurances and certifications are attached 
as Appendix C.
A. Regulations
     29 CFR parts 31 and 32--Nondiscrimination in Federally 
Assisted Programs of the Department of Labor (respectively, 
effectuation of Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964, and on the Basis 
of Handicap in Programs and Activities Receiving or Benefiting from 
Federal Financial Assistance).
     29 CFR part 35--Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age in 
Programs or Activities receiving Federal Financial Assistance from the 
Department of Labor.

[[Page 29181]]

     29 CFR part 36--Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in 
Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial 
Assistance.
     29 CFR part 93--New Restrictions on Lobbying.
     29 CFR part 95--Uniform Administrative Requirements for 
Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals 
and Other Non-Profit Organizations, and with Commercial Organizations, 
Foreign Governments, Organizations Under the Jurisdiction of Foreign 
Governments and International Organizations.
     29 CFR part 96--Federal Standards for Audit of Federally 
Funded Grants, Contracts and Agreements.
     29 CFR part 97--Uniform Administrative Regulations for 
Grants to States, Local Governments or Tribes.
     29 CFR part 98--Federal Standards for Governmentwide 
Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) and Governmentwide 
Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Grants).
     29 CFR part 99--Federal Standards for Audits of States, 
Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations.
     29 CFR part 2--General Participation in Department of 
Labor Programs by Faith-Based and Community Organizations; Equal 
Treatment of All Department of Labor Program Participants and 
Beneficiaries.
     Applicable cost principles under OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, 
A-122, or 48 CFR part 31.
B. Travel
    Any travel undertaken in performance of this cooperative agreement 
shall be subject to and in strict accordance with Federal travel 
regulations.
C. Acknowledgement of USDOL Funding
    Printed Materials: In all circumstances, the following shall be 
displayed on printed materials prepared by the grantee while in receipt 
of DOL grant funding: ``Preparation of this item was funded by the 
United States Department of Labor under Grant No. [insert the 
appropriate Grant number].''
     All printed materials must also include the following 
notice: ``This document does not necessarily reflect the views or 
policies of the U.S. Department of Labor, nor does mention of trade 
names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the 
U.S. Government.''
    Public reference to grant: When issuing statements, press releases, 
requests for proposals, bid solicitations, and other documents 
describing projects or programs funded in whole or in part with Federal 
money, all Grantees receiving Federal funds must clearly state:
     The percentage of the total costs of the program or 
project, which will be financed with Federal money;
     The dollar amount of Federal financial assistance for the 
project or program; and
     The percentage and dollar amount of the total costs of the 
project or program that will be financed by non-governmental sources.
    Use of USDOL Logo: In consultation with USDOL ODEP, the Grantee 
must acknowledge USDOL's role as described below:
     The USDOL logo may be applied to USDOL-funded material 
prepared for world-wide distribution, including posters, videos, 
pamphlets, research documents, national survey results, impact 
evaluations, best practice reports, and other publications of global 
interest. The Grantee(s) must consult with USDOL on whether the logo 
may be used on any such items prior to final draft or final preparation 
for distribution. In no event shall the USDOL logo be placed on any 
item until USDOL has given the Grantee written permission to use the 
logo on the item.
     All documents must include the following notice: ``This 
document does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. 
Department of Labor, nor does mention of trade names, commercial 
products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.''
D. Intellectual Property
    Please be advised that DOL will reserve a royalty-free, 
nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, 
distribute, publicly display and perform, and create derivative works 
from, and to authorize others to use, for Federal Government purposes: 
(1) The copyright in any work developed under a grant, subgrant, or 
contract under a grant or subgrant; and (2) any rights of copyright to 
which a grantee, subgrantee or a contractor purchases ownership with 
grant support.
    In addition, the grantee will agree to notify DOL of any pre-
existing copyrighted materials it intends to incorporate into materials 
developed under the grant, and, prior to such incorporation, the 
grantee will agree that it will acquire, on behalf of DOL, any 
necessary licenses to allow DOL to exercise the rights described