Self-Regulatory Organizations; Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 2 Thereto Relating to Dissemination of Index Values, 28738-28740 [E6-7464]
Download as PDF
28738
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 2006 / Notices
Exchange jurisdiction and oversight
with respect to their activities.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange believes that the
proposal does not impose any burden
on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received from
Members, Participants, or Others
Comments were neither solicited nor
received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the Exchange consents,
the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed
rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSE–2006–05 on the
subject line.
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the NYSE.
All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2006–05 and should
be submitted on or before June 7, 2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–7466 Filed 5–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–53790; File No. SR–Phlx–
2006–04]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Order Granting Approval of Proposed
Rule Change and Amendment No. 2
Thereto Relating to Dissemination of
Index Values
May 11, 2006.
I. Introduction
On January 12, 2006, the Philadelphia
Stock Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Phlx’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
Paper Comments
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to section
• Send paper comments in triplicate
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
Securities and Exchange Commission,
thereunder,2 a proposal to license the
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
current and closing index values
20549–1090.
underlying the Exchange’s proprietary
All submissions should refer to File
options to its wholly owned subsidiary,
Number SR–NYSE–2006–05. This file
the Philadelphia Board of Trade
number should be included on the
(‘‘PBOT’’), and to allow PBOT to collect
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the subscriber fees from market data
Commission process and review your
vendors. The Phlx filed Amendment No.
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
19 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
post all comments on the Commission’s
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:08 May 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 to the proposed rule change on March
23, 2006 and submitted notification of
withdrawal of Amendment No. 1 on
March 24, 2006. On March 24, 2006, the
Phlx filed Amendment No. 2 to the
proposed rule change. The proposed
rule change, as amended, was published
for comment in the Federal Register on
April 7, 2006.3 The Commission
received no comments regarding the
proposal.4 This order approves the
proposed rule change, as amended.
II. Description of the Proposal
A. Dissemination of Index Values
The Phlx proposes to license the
current and closing index values
underlying most of the Phlx’s
proprietary indexes including the
following options to PBOT for the
purpose of selling, reproducing, and
distributing the index values over
PBOT’s Market Data Distribution
Network (‘‘MDDN’’) 5: the Phlx Gold/
Silver Sector SM (‘‘XAU SM’’), Phlx Oil
Service Sector SM (‘‘OSX SM’’), Phlx
Semiconductor Sector (‘‘SOX SM’’), and
the Phlx Utility Sector SM (‘‘UTY SM’’)
(together, the ‘‘Approved Index
Options’’). The Exchange proposes that
the index values underlying the
Approved Index Options no longer be
disseminated as described in their
respective Rule 19b–4 filings and
approval orders.6
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53584
(March 31, 2006), 71 FR 17938.
4 Although the Commission received no written
comments on the proposed rule change, the
Exchange did receive one comment opposing the
Exchange’s underlying decision to remove index
values from the consolidated tape and disseminate
them through PBOT. See e-mail from Brian Schaer
to the Exchange dated Thursday, August 25, 2005.
The Exchange believes that the continued listing
and trading of the Approved Index Options, the
relocation of Phlx proprietary index values from the
consolidated tape to PBOT, and the fees to be
assessed by PBOT after underlying index values are
removed from the consolidated tape are appropriate
and consistent with the Act so long as the index
values continue to be widely disseminated by one
or more market data vendors.
5 Additional information regarding the PBOT
MDDN can be found on the Exchange’s Web site at
https://www.phlx.com/pbot/Market_Data/
mktdata.html.
Phlx also lists and trades options on a number of
other stock indices whose values will not be
disseminated by PBOT. Phlx represents that those
indices will continue to be maintained, and options
thereon will continue to be listed, as they are today.
Phlx further represents that PBOT has, however,
secured a similar license from one other index
provider, and Phlx anticipates that PBOT will enter
into similar license agreements with proprietors of
other indexes underlying options traded on the
Phlx.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 20437
(December 2, 1983), 48 FR 55229 (December 9,
1983) (XAU); 38207 (January 27, 1997), 62 FR 5268
(February 4, 1997) (OSX); 34546 (August 18, 1994),
59 FR 43881 (August 25, 1994) (SOX); 24889
(September 9, 1987), 52 FR 35021 (September 16,
1987) (UTY). In the proposed rule changes filed by
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 2006 / Notices
The Exchange proposes to cease
disseminating the current and closing
index values of certain of its proprietary
indexes 7 over the facilities of the
Consolidated Tape Association
(‘‘CTA’’). The Exchange states that it has
entered into a license agreement with
PBOT pursuant to which PBOT will
disseminate such values solely over the
PBOT’s MDDN.8 The Exchange or its
third party designee will objectively
calculate and make available to PBOT
every 15 seconds real time current and
closing index values on each trading
day. The three industry leading market
data vendors would make the real time
market data widely available to
subscribers, as would several mid-tier
vendors.9
B. Subscriber Fees
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
The Exchange also proposes to allow
PBOT to charge subscriber fees to
vendors of market data for all the values
of Phlx’s proprietary indexes
disseminated by PBOT’s MDDN. The
subscriber fees are set out in agreements
that PBOT would execute and has
executed with various market data
vendors for the right to receive, store,
and retransmit the current and closing
index values transmitted over the
the Exchange seeking Commission approval for the
listing and trading of the Approved Index Options,
the Exchange made certain representations
regarding the manner in which index values would
be disseminated. The Commission’s approval orders
also described the index value dissemination
procedures in some cases.
7 Phlx’s proprietary indexes are, in addition to the
indexes underlying the Approved Index Options,
the Phlx Defense Sector SM, Phlx Drug Sector SM,
Phlx Europe Sector SM, Phlx Housing Sector SM, and
the Phlx World Energy Index SM, all of which were
listed pursuant to Phlx Rule 1009A(b), the
Exchange’s generic index option listing standard
rule. Phlx’s proprietary indexes are owned and
maintained by Phlx. The Exchange represents that
it has determined not to remove the Phlx World
Energy Index SM (‘‘XWE’’ SM) and the Phlx Europe
Sector SM (‘‘XEX’’ SM) from CTA immediately but
proposes to move these index values to the PBOT
MDDN at a future date.
8 The MDDN is a new internet protocol multicast
network developed by PBOT and SAVVIS
Communications. The Exchange states that its
licensing agreement grants PBOT the exclusive,
royalty-free, worldwide right to sell, offer for sale,
perform, display, reproduce and distribute the
current and closing index values derived from the
Exchange’s proprietary indices. Phlx represents that
the license does not include the right to sublicense,
modify, improve or create derivative works of, the
values or the indices. Phlx also states that it may
list options on new Phlx proprietary indexes in the
future, in which event the underlying current and
closing values of those new indexes will also be
disseminated over the PBOT MDDN, and not over
CTA Tape B.
9 The term ‘‘vendors’’ as used herein includes
subvendors which receive the market data feed
from vendors rather than directly from PBOT, but
which execute the same agreement with PBOT that
vendors execute and pay the same subscriber fees.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:08 May 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
MDDN.10 Phlx proposes that all vendors
will be charged, based upon usage by
their subscribers, a monthly fee of $1.00
per ‘‘Device,’’ as defined in the
agreement,11 that is used by vendors
and their subscribers to receive and retransmit Phlx proprietary sector index
current and settlement values on a real
time basis and disseminated every 15
seconds. This monthly fee would be
reduced by 15% for those vendors
which provide market data to 200,000 or
more Devices in any month (‘‘15 Percent
Administrative Fee Deduction’’). For
snapshot data, which is essentially
market data that is refreshed no more
frequently than once every 60 seconds,
Phlx proposes that vendors will be
charged $.00025 per request or $1,500
per month for unlimited snapshot data
requests.12
III. Discussion
After careful consideration, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
exchange 13 and, in particular, the
10 The Exchange represents that approximately 25
vendors, including for example Bloomberg L.P.,
Telekurs Financial Information Ltd. and Thomson
Financial, have already entered into such market
data agreements with PBOT. At least three of the
vendors have elected to offer only the continuous
real-time market data and will not offer snapshot or
delayed data. The fees described in this proposed
rule change cover values of all the indexes
disseminated over the MDDN.
11 The definition of ‘‘Device’’ in the agreement is
complex and incorporates a number of other
defined terms. The agreement provides that
‘‘Device’’ shall mean, in case of each Subscriber and
in such Subscriber’s discretion, either any Terminal
or any End User. For the avoidance of doubt, a
Subscriber’s Device may be exclusively Terminals,
exclusively End Users or a combination of
Terminals or End Users and shall be reported in a
manner that is consistent with the way the Vendor
identifies such Subscriber’s access to Vendor’s data.
By way of further explanation, an ‘‘End User’’ is
an individual authorized or allowed by a vendor or
a Subscriber to access and display real time market
data that distributed by PBOT over the MDDN; and
a ‘‘Terminal’’ is any type of equipment (fixed or
portable) that accesses and displays such market
data. For example, a vendor whose Subscribers
collectively may access the index values on a realtime basis through 10,000 Devices would be
assessed a monthly fee of $10,000. A vendor which
makes available unlimited snapshot data to its
customers would be assessed a monthly fee of
$1500.00 regardless of the number of End Users or
Devices involved.
12 The index values may also be made available
by vendors on a delayed basis (i.e., no sooner than
twenty minutes following receipt of the data by
vendors) at no charge. The Exchange also notes that
Devices used in customer service areas or for
purposes such as quality control, software
programming, sales demonstrations, or promotions
are not subject to any fees.
13 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28739
requirements of section 6 of the Act.14
Specifically, as discussed in detail
below, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
section 6(b)(5) of the Act,15 which
requires, among other things, that the
rules of a national securities exchange
be designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, and
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. In
addition, the Commission believes that
the proposal is consistent with section
6(b)(4) of the Act,16 in that the proposed
rule change provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among the Exchange’s
members and issuers and other persons
using its facilities as described below.
The subscriber fees are also consistent
with Rule 603 under the Act.17
A. Dissemination of Index Values
The Commission believes that the
Exchange’s proposal to disseminate the
index values of its proprietary index
options through PBOT is consistent
with the Commission’s requirement that
the index values underlying exchange
traded options and other products be
frequently and widely disseminated.18
The Exchange has represented that
under its proposal current index values
for the Phlx proprietary indexes would
be widely disseminated by one or more
major market data vendors at least every
15 seconds during Exchange trading
hours and that closing index values
would be promptly disseminated.19
14 15
U.S.C. 78f.
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
16 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
17 17 CFR 242.603.
18 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
40761 (December 8, 1998), 63 FR 70952 (December
22, 1998), at 70960; 52572 (October 7, 2005), 70 FR
60125 (October 14, 2005) (SR–Phlx–2005–57)
(amending the listing standards for Trust Shares
and Index Fund Shares to provide that the current
value of the underlying index must be widely
disseminated by one or more market data vendors
every 15 seconds); and 51748 (May 26, 2005), 70
FR 32684 (June 3, 2005) (SR–NASD–2005–024)
(revising the listing standards for Portfolio
Depository Receipts and Index Fund Shares to
provide that the current value of the underlying
index must be widely disseminated by one or more
major market data vendors at least every 15
seconds); 51868 (June 17, 2005), 70 FR 36672 (June
24, 2005) (SR–Amex–2005–044).
19 This is consistent with Phlx Rule 1100A(a),
which provides that ‘‘[t]he Exchange shall
15 15
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
Continued
17MYN1
28740
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 2006 / Notices
The Commission notes that, apart
from changing the mechanism by which
index values are disseminated, the
Exchange represents that it will
continue to maintain the indexes
underlying the Approved Index Options
as described in their respective Rule
19b–4 filings and approval orders. Thus,
the Commission believes the proposal
will continue to provide investors with
the pricing information necessary for
the orderly trading of options and
derivative securities based on these
indexes.
B. Subscriber Fees
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
The Exchange represents that the fees
to be charged by PBOT are consistent
with the requirements of Rule 603 under
the Act in that the fees are fair and
reasonable and not unreasonably
discriminatory.20 The Commission
believes that PBOT’s proposed fee
structure is reasonable as it is based on
the type of data received (real-time,
delayed and snapshot), which is, in
turn, generally based on the timeliness
of the data.21
With regard to the 15 percent
Administrative Fee Deduction proposed
by the Exchange, the Commission does
not believe it to be unreasonably
discriminatory. As proposed by the
Exchange, vendors which provide
market data to 200,000 or more Devices
in any given month would receive a
credit against the fees charged and
collected by PBOT pursuant to the
vendor agreement. Any vendor that
meets the 200,000 Device standard will
qualify for and receive the 15 Percent
Administrative Fee Deduction. The
Exchange represents that PBOT is
disseminate or shall assure that the closing index
value is disseminated after the close of business and
the current index value is disseminated from timeto-time on days on which transactions in index
options are made on the Exchange.’’ Current
underlying index values for narrow-based index
options trading pursuant to Phlx Rule 1009A(b) and
Rule 19b–4(e) under the Act are also reported at
least once every 15 seconds during the time the
index options are traded on the Exchange pursuant
to Phlx Rule 1009A(b)(10).
20 17 CFR 242.603 (Distribution, consolidation,
and display of information with respect to
quotations for and transactions in NMS stocks). The
Exchange represents that the Vendor/Subvendor
Agreements between PBOT and the market data
vendors provide that PBOT may change any of the
fees enumerated in the agreement by giving the
vendor or subvendor advance written notice of such
changes. The Commission notes that any such fee
changes would need to be submitted to the
Commission under section 19(b) of the Act.
21 The Exchange represents that it does not
presently realize any revenue from the sale of
current and closing index values disseminated over
CTA that are not shared with other CTA Plan
participants. Currently, market data vendors pay a
$200.00 monthly fee to CTA for the right to
redistribute current and closing index values on a
real time basis, together with delayed last sale data.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:17 May 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
offering the 15 Percent Administrative
Fee Deduction as an incentive for large
market data vendors to carry the data
disseminated by the PBOT network. The
Commission recognizes that volumebased discounts of fees are not
uncommon, and where the discount can
be applied objectively, it is consistent
with Rule 603. For the same reasons
noted above, the Commission believes
that the fee structure meets the standard
in section 6(b)(4) of the Act 22 in that the
proposed rule change provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among the
Exchange’s members and issuers and
other persons using its facilities.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Act,23 that the
proposed rule change (SR–Phlx–2006–
04), as amended, is hereby approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.24
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–7464 Filed 5–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #10464 and #10465]
Tennessee Disaster # TN–00009
Small Business Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This is a notice of an
Administrative declaration of a disaster
for the State of Tennessee dated 05/09/
2006.
Incident: Severe Storms.
Incident Period: 04/25/2006.
Effective Date: 05/09/2006.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 07/10/2006.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 02/09/2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, National Processing
and Disbursement Center, 14925
Kingsport Road, Fort Worth , TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
Administrator’s disaster declaration
SUMMARY:
22 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
24 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
23 15
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
applications for disaster loans may be
filed at the address listed above or other
locally announced locations.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
Primary Counties: Gibson.
Contiguous Counties: Tennessee:
Carroll; Crockett; Dyer; Madison;
Obion; Weakley.
The Interest Rates are:
Percent
Homeowners With Credit Available
Elsewhere ...................................
Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere ...........................
Businesses With Credit Available
Elsewhere ...................................
Businesses & Small Agricultural
Cooperatives
Without
Credit
Available Elsewhere ....................
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available
Elsewhere ...................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available
Elsewhere ...................................
5.875.
2.937.
7.763.
4.000.
5.000.
4.000.
The number assigned to this disaster
for physical damage is 10464 B and for
economic injury is 104650. The State
which received an EIDL Declaration # is
Tennessee.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers 59002 and 59008.)
Hector V. Barreto,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6–7460 Filed 5–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Request
The Social Security Administration
(SSA) publishes a list of information
collection packages that will require
clearance by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) in compliance with
Public Law 104–13, the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, effective October
1, 1995. The information collection
package that may be included in this
notice is for a new information
collection.
SSA is soliciting comments on the
accuracy of the agency’s burden
estimate; the need for the information;
its practical utility; ways to enhance its
quality, utility, and clarity; and on ways
to minimize burden on respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Written
comments and recommendations
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28738-28740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7464]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-53790; File No. SR-Phlx-2006-04]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 2
Thereto Relating to Dissemination of Index Values
May 11, 2006.
I. Introduction
On January 12, 2006, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.
(``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\2\ a proposal to license the current and closing index
values underlying the Exchange's proprietary options to its wholly
owned subsidiary, the Philadelphia Board of Trade (``PBOT''), and to
allow PBOT to collect subscriber fees from market data vendors. The
Phlx filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change on March 23,
2006 and submitted notification of withdrawal of Amendment No. 1 on
March 24, 2006. On March 24, 2006, the Phlx filed Amendment No. 2 to
the proposed rule change. The proposed rule change, as amended, was
published for comment in the Federal Register on April 7, 2006.\3\ The
Commission received no comments regarding the proposal.\4\ This order
approves the proposed rule change, as amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53584 (March 31,
2006), 71 FR 17938.
\4\ Although the Commission received no written comments on the
proposed rule change, the Exchange did receive one comment opposing
the Exchange's underlying decision to remove index values from the
consolidated tape and disseminate them through PBOT. See e-mail from
Brian Schaer to the Exchange dated Thursday, August 25, 2005. The
Exchange believes that the continued listing and trading of the
Approved Index Options, the relocation of Phlx proprietary index
values from the consolidated tape to PBOT, and the fees to be
assessed by PBOT after underlying index values are removed from the
consolidated tape are appropriate and consistent with the Act so
long as the index values continue to be widely disseminated by one
or more market data vendors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposal
A. Dissemination of Index Values
The Phlx proposes to license the current and closing index values
underlying most of the Phlx's proprietary indexes including the
following options to PBOT for the purpose of selling, reproducing, and
distributing the index values over PBOT's Market Data Distribution
Network (``MDDN'') \5\: the Phlx Gold/Silver Sector \SM\ (``XAU
\SM\''), Phlx Oil Service Sector \SM\ (``OSX \SM\''), Phlx
Semiconductor Sector (``SOX \SM\''), and the Phlx Utility Sector \SM\
(``UTY \SM\'') (together, the ``Approved Index Options''). The Exchange
proposes that the index values underlying the Approved Index Options no
longer be disseminated as described in their respective Rule 19b-4
filings and approval orders.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Additional information regarding the PBOT MDDN can be found
on the Exchange's Web site at https://www.phlx.com/pbot/Market_Data/
mktdata.html.
Phlx also lists and trades options on a number of other stock
indices whose values will not be disseminated by PBOT. Phlx
represents that those indices will continue to be maintained, and
options thereon will continue to be listed, as they are today. Phlx
further represents that PBOT has, however, secured a similar license
from one other index provider, and Phlx anticipates that PBOT will
enter into similar license agreements with proprietors of other
indexes underlying options traded on the Phlx.
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 20437 (December 2,
1983), 48 FR 55229 (December 9, 1983) (XAU); 38207 (January 27,
1997), 62 FR 5268 (February 4, 1997) (OSX); 34546 (August 18, 1994),
59 FR 43881 (August 25, 1994) (SOX); 24889 (September 9, 1987), 52
FR 35021 (September 16, 1987) (UTY). In the proposed rule changes
filed by the Exchange seeking Commission approval for the listing
and trading of the Approved Index Options, the Exchange made certain
representations regarding the manner in which index values would be
disseminated. The Commission's approval orders also described the
index value dissemination procedures in some cases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 28739]]
The Exchange proposes to cease disseminating the current and
closing index values of certain of its proprietary indexes \7\ over the
facilities of the Consolidated Tape Association (``CTA''). The Exchange
states that it has entered into a license agreement with PBOT pursuant
to which PBOT will disseminate such values solely over the PBOT's
MDDN.\8\ The Exchange or its third party designee will objectively
calculate and make available to PBOT every 15 seconds real time current
and closing index values on each trading day. The three industry
leading market data vendors would make the real time market data widely
available to subscribers, as would several mid-tier vendors.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Phlx's proprietary indexes are, in addition to the indexes
underlying the Approved Index Options, the Phlx Defense Sector \SM\,
Phlx Drug Sector \SM\, Phlx Europe Sector \SM\, Phlx Housing Sector
\SM\, and the Phlx World Energy Index \SM\, all of which were listed
pursuant to Phlx Rule 1009A(b), the Exchange's generic index option
listing standard rule. Phlx's proprietary indexes are owned and
maintained by Phlx. The Exchange represents that it has determined
not to remove the Phlx World Energy Index \SM\ (``XWE'' \SM\) and
the Phlx Europe Sector \SM\ (``XEX'' \SM\) from CTA immediately but
proposes to move these index values to the PBOT MDDN at a future
date.
\8\ The MDDN is a new internet protocol multicast network
developed by PBOT and SAVVIS Communications. The Exchange states
that its licensing agreement grants PBOT the exclusive, royalty-
free, worldwide right to sell, offer for sale, perform, display,
reproduce and distribute the current and closing index values
derived from the Exchange's proprietary indices. Phlx represents
that the license does not include the right to sublicense, modify,
improve or create derivative works of, the values or the indices.
Phlx also states that it may list options on new Phlx proprietary
indexes in the future, in which event the underlying current and
closing values of those new indexes will also be disseminated over
the PBOT MDDN, and not over CTA Tape B.
\9\ The term ``vendors'' as used herein includes subvendors
which receive the market data feed from vendors rather than directly
from PBOT, but which execute the same agreement with PBOT that
vendors execute and pay the same subscriber fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Subscriber Fees
The Exchange also proposes to allow PBOT to charge subscriber fees
to vendors of market data for all the values of Phlx's proprietary
indexes disseminated by PBOT's MDDN. The subscriber fees are set out in
agreements that PBOT would execute and has executed with various market
data vendors for the right to receive, store, and retransmit the
current and closing index values transmitted over the MDDN.\10\ Phlx
proposes that all vendors will be charged, based upon usage by their
subscribers, a monthly fee of $1.00 per ``Device,'' as defined in the
agreement,\11\ that is used by vendors and their subscribers to receive
and re-transmit Phlx proprietary sector index current and settlement
values on a real time basis and disseminated every 15 seconds. This
monthly fee would be reduced by 15% for those vendors which provide
market data to 200,000 or more Devices in any month (``15 Percent
Administrative Fee Deduction''). For snapshot data, which is
essentially market data that is refreshed no more frequently than once
every 60 seconds, Phlx proposes that vendors will be charged $.00025
per request or $1,500 per month for unlimited snapshot data
requests.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The Exchange represents that approximately 25 vendors,
including for example Bloomberg L.P., Telekurs Financial Information
Ltd. and Thomson Financial, have already entered into such market
data agreements with PBOT. At least three of the vendors have
elected to offer only the continuous real-time market data and will
not offer snapshot or delayed data. The fees described in this
proposed rule change cover values of all the indexes disseminated
over the MDDN.
\11\ The definition of ``Device'' in the agreement is complex
and incorporates a number of other defined terms. The agreement
provides that ``Device'' shall mean, in case of each Subscriber and
in such Subscriber's discretion, either any Terminal or any End
User. For the avoidance of doubt, a Subscriber's Device may be
exclusively Terminals, exclusively End Users or a combination of
Terminals or End Users and shall be reported in a manner that is
consistent with the way the Vendor identifies such Subscriber's
access to Vendor's data.
By way of further explanation, an ``End User'' is an individual
authorized or allowed by a vendor or a Subscriber to access and
display real time market data that distributed by PBOT over the
MDDN; and a ``Terminal'' is any type of equipment (fixed or
portable) that accesses and displays such market data. For example,
a vendor whose Subscribers collectively may access the index values
on a real-time basis through 10,000 Devices would be assessed a
monthly fee of $10,000. A vendor which makes available unlimited
snapshot data to its customers would be assessed a monthly fee of
$1500.00 regardless of the number of End Users or Devices involved.
\12\ The index values may also be made available by vendors on a
delayed basis (i.e., no sooner than twenty minutes following receipt
of the data by vendors) at no charge. The Exchange also notes that
Devices used in customer service areas or for purposes such as
quality control, software programming, sales demonstrations, or
promotions are not subject to any fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion
After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent with the requirements of the Act
and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange \13\ and, in particular, the requirements of
section 6 of the Act.\14\ Specifically, as discussed in detail below,
the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with
section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\15\ which requires, among other things,
that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, and processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. In addition, the Commission
believes that the proposal is consistent with section 6(b)(4) of the
Act,\16\ in that the proposed rule change provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among the
Exchange's members and issuers and other persons using its facilities
as described below. The subscriber fees are also consistent with Rule
603 under the Act.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\17\ 17 CFR 242.603.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Dissemination of Index Values
The Commission believes that the Exchange's proposal to disseminate
the index values of its proprietary index options through PBOT is
consistent with the Commission's requirement that the index values
underlying exchange traded options and other products be frequently and
widely disseminated.\18\ The Exchange has represented that under its
proposal current index values for the Phlx proprietary indexes would be
widely disseminated by one or more major market data vendors at least
every 15 seconds during Exchange trading hours and that closing index
values would be promptly disseminated.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 40761 (December 8,
1998), 63 FR 70952 (December 22, 1998), at 70960; 52572 (October 7,
2005), 70 FR 60125 (October 14, 2005) (SR-Phlx-2005-57) (amending
the listing standards for Trust Shares and Index Fund Shares to
provide that the current value of the underlying index must be
widely disseminated by one or more market data vendors every 15
seconds); and 51748 (May 26, 2005), 70 FR 32684 (June 3, 2005) (SR-
NASD-2005-024) (revising the listing standards for Portfolio
Depository Receipts and Index Fund Shares to provide that the
current value of the underlying index must be widely disseminated by
one or more major market data vendors at least every 15 seconds);
51868 (June 17, 2005), 70 FR 36672 (June 24, 2005) (SR-Amex-2005-
044).
\19\ This is consistent with Phlx Rule 1100A(a), which provides
that ``[t]he Exchange shall disseminate or shall assure that the
closing index value is disseminated after the close of business and
the current index value is disseminated from time-to-time on days on
which transactions in index options are made on the Exchange.''
Current underlying index values for narrow-based index options
trading pursuant to Phlx Rule 1009A(b) and Rule 19b-4(e) under the
Act are also reported at least once every 15 seconds during the time
the index options are traded on the Exchange pursuant to Phlx Rule
1009A(b)(10).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 28740]]
The Commission notes that, apart from changing the mechanism by
which index values are disseminated, the Exchange represents that it
will continue to maintain the indexes underlying the Approved Index
Options as described in their respective Rule 19b-4 filings and
approval orders. Thus, the Commission believes the proposal will
continue to provide investors with the pricing information necessary
for the orderly trading of options and derivative securities based on
these indexes.
B. Subscriber Fees
The Exchange represents that the fees to be charged by PBOT are
consistent with the requirements of Rule 603 under the Act in that the
fees are fair and reasonable and not unreasonably discriminatory.\20\
The Commission believes that PBOT's proposed fee structure is
reasonable as it is based on the type of data received (real-time,
delayed and snapshot), which is, in turn, generally based on the
timeliness of the data.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 17 CFR 242.603 (Distribution, consolidation, and display of
information with respect to quotations for and transactions in NMS
stocks). The Exchange represents that the Vendor/Subvendor
Agreements between PBOT and the market data vendors provide that
PBOT may change any of the fees enumerated in the agreement by
giving the vendor or subvendor advance written notice of such
changes. The Commission notes that any such fee changes would need
to be submitted to the Commission under section 19(b) of the Act.
\21\ The Exchange represents that it does not presently realize
any revenue from the sale of current and closing index values
disseminated over CTA that are not shared with other CTA Plan
participants. Currently, market data vendors pay a $200.00 monthly
fee to CTA for the right to redistribute current and closing index
values on a real time basis, together with delayed last sale data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With regard to the 15 percent Administrative Fee Deduction proposed
by the Exchange, the Commission does not believe it to be unreasonably
discriminatory. As proposed by the Exchange, vendors which provide
market data to 200,000 or more Devices in any given month would receive
a credit against the fees charged and collected by PBOT pursuant to the
vendor agreement. Any vendor that meets the 200,000 Device standard
will qualify for and receive the 15 Percent Administrative Fee
Deduction. The Exchange represents that PBOT is offering the 15 Percent
Administrative Fee Deduction as an incentive for large market data
vendors to carry the data disseminated by the PBOT network. The
Commission recognizes that volume-based discounts of fees are not
uncommon, and where the discount can be applied objectively, it is
consistent with Rule 603. For the same reasons noted above, the
Commission believes that the fee structure meets the standard in
section 6(b)(4) of the Act \22\ in that the proposed rule change
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among the Exchange's members and issuers and other
persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\23\ that the proposed rule change (SR-Phlx-2006-04), as amended,
is hereby approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-7464 Filed 5-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P