Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto Relating to the Adoption of a Licensing Fee for Options on the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation VIPERs, 28717-28718 [E6-7461]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 2006 / Notices
at: https://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/
policy-making/schedule.html.
The NRC provides reasonable
accommodation to individuals with
disabilities where appropriate. If you
need a reasonable accommodation to
participate in these public meetings, or
need this meeting notice or the
transcript or other information from the
public meetings in another format (e.g.,
braille, large print), please notify the
NRC’s Disability Program Coordinator,
Deborah Chan, at (301) 415–7041, TDD:
(301) 415–2100, or by e-mail at
DLC@brc.gov. Determinations on
requests for reasonable accommodation
will be made on a case-by-case basis.
This notice is distributed by mail to
several hundred subscribers; if you no
longer wish to receive it, or would like
to be added to the distribution, please
contact the Office of the Secretary,
Washington, DC 20555 (301) 415–1969.
In addition, distribution of this meeting
notice over the Internet system is
available. If you are interested in
receiving this Commission meeting
schedule electronically, please send an
electronic message to dkw@nrc.gov.
Dated: May 11, 2006.
R. Michelle Schroll,
Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06–4653 Filed 5–15–06; 11:54 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–M
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–53786; File No. SR–Amex–
2006–39]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto
Relating to the Adoption of a Licensing
Fee for Options on the Vanguard
Dividend Appreciation VIPERs
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
May 11, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 26,
2006, the American Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘Amex’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) submitted to
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by Amex. On May
9, 2006, the Exchange submitted
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change, withdrew Amendment No. 1 to
the proposed rule change and submitted
Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule
change.3 Amex has designated this
proposal as one establishing or changing
a due, fee, or other charge imposed by
the self-regulatory organization under
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 4 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,5 which
renders it effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change,
as amended, from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify its
Options Fee Schedule by adopting a per
contract licensing fee for the orders of
specialists, registered options traders
(‘‘ROTs’’), firms, non-member market
makers, and broker-dealers in
connection with options transactions on
the shares of the Vanguard Dividend
Appreciation VIPERs (symbol: VIG).
The text of the proposed rule change,
as amended, is available on the Amex’s
Web site at https://www.amex.com, at the
principal office of the Amex, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
Amex included statements concerning
the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. Amex has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Amex proposes to adopt a per
contract licensing fee for options on
VIG. This fee change will be assessed on
members commencing April 27, 2006.
The Exchange has entered into
numerous agreements with various
index providers for the purpose of
trading options on certain exchange
traded funds (‘‘ETFs’’), such as VIG.
This requirement to pay an index
license fee to a third party is a condition
to the listing and trading of these ETF
3 See
Partial Amendment No. 2.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:08 May 16, 2006
4 15
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28717
options. In many cases, the Exchange is
required to pay a significant licensing
fee to the index provider that may not
be reimbursed. In an effort to recoup the
costs associated with certain index
licenses, the Exchange has established a
per contract licensing fee for the orders
of specialists, ROTs, firms, non-member
market makers and broker-dealers,
which is collected on every option
transaction in designated products in
which such market participant is a
party.6
The purpose of this proposal is to
charge an options licensing fee in
connection with options on VIG.
Specifically, Amex seeks to charge an
options licensing fee of $0.10 per
contract side for the VIG options for
specialist, ROT, firm, non-member
market maker and broker-dealer orders
executed on the Exchange. In all cases,
the fees will be charged only to the
Exchange members through whom the
orders are placed.
The proposed options licensing fee
will allow the Exchange to recoup its
costs in connection with the index
license fee for the trading of the VIG
options. The fees will be collected on
every order of a specialist, ROT, firm,
non-member market maker, and brokerdealer executed on the Exchange. The
Exchange believes that the proposal to
require payment of a per contract
licensing fee in connection with the VIG
options by those market participants
that are the beneficiaries of Exchange
index license agreements is justified and
consistent with the rules of the
Exchange.
The Exchange notes that the Amex, in
recent years, has revised a number of
fees to better align Exchange fees with
the actual cost of delivering services and
reduce Exchange subsidies of such
services.7 Amex believes that the
implementation of this proposal is
consistent with the reduction and/or
elimination of these subsidies. Amex
believes that these fees will help to
allocate to those market participants
engaging in transactions in VIG options
a fair share of the related costs of
offering such options.
The Exchange asserts that the
proposal is equitable as required by
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act.8 In
6 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No.
52493 (September 22, 2005), 70 FR 56941
(September 29, 2005).
7 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
45360 (January 29, 2002), 67 FR 5626 (February 6,
2002); and 44286 (May 9, 2001), 66 FR 27187 (May
16, 2001).
8 Section 6(b)(4) of the Act requires that the rules
of a national securities exchange provide for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
Continued
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
28718
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 2006 / Notices
connection with the adoption of an
options licensing fee for VIG options,
the Exchange believes that charging an
options licensing fee, where applicable,
to all market participant orders except
for customer orders is reasonable, given
the competitive pressures in the
industry. Accordingly, the Exchange
seeks, through this proposal, to better
align its transaction charges with the
cost of providing products.
2. Statutory Basis
Amex believes that the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 9 regarding the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among exchange
members and other persons using
exchange facilities.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
Amex believes that the proposed rule
change, as amended, does not impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change, as amended.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change was filed
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the
Act 10 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2)
thereunder,11 because it establishes or
changes a due, fee, or other charge
imposed by the self-regulatory
organization.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Electronic Comments
[Release No. 34–53793; File No. SR–Amex–
2005–103]
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Amex–2006–39 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Amex–2006–39. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Amex. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Amex–2006–39 and should
be submitted on or before June 7, 2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–7461 Filed 5–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
other charges among its members and issuers and
other persons using its facilities.
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
11 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:08 May 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
12 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
American Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Granting Approval of Proposed Rule
Change and Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3
and 4 Thereto Allowing Issuers of
Listed Equity Securities, Structured
Products, and Exchange Traded Funds
a Right To Request a New Specialist
May 11, 2006.
On October 13, 2005, the American
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘Amex’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
amend Amex Rule 27 to give issuers of
listed equity securities and structured
products, as well as sponsors of
exchange traded funds (‘‘ETFs’’), a right
to request a new specialist. On January
26, 2006, Amex filed Amendment No. 1
to the proposed rule change.3 On
January 30, 2006, Amex filed
Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule
change.4 On February 17, 2006, Amex
filed Amendment No. 3 to the proposed
rule change.5 On March 6, 2006, Amex
filed Amendment No. 4 to the proposed
rule change.6 The proposed rule change,
as amended, was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
April 4, 2006.7 The Commission
received no comments on the proposal.
This order approves the proposed rule
change, as amended.
I. Description of the Proposal
Amex Rule 27(e) currently gives the
issuer of an equity security or a
structured product and the sponsor of
an ETF a one-time right to request a
reallocation to a different specialist unit
within twelve months after the listing of
the security.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange proposed
further changes to Amex Rule 27(e) and (f) and
made revisions to the purpose section of the
proposed rule change.
4 In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange made
revisions to the purpose section of the proposed
rule change to reflect changes to the text of Amex
Rule 27(f) made in Amendment No. 1
5 In Amendment No. 3, the Exchange proposed
further changes to Amex Rule 27(e) and (f) and
made revisions to the purpose section of the
proposed rule change.
6 In Amendment No. 4, the Exchange proposed
minor technical changes to the text of Amex Rule
27(e) and (f).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53561
(March 29, 2006), 71 FR 16841.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28717-28718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7461]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-53786; File No. SR-Amex-2006-39]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto Relating to the Adoption of a
Licensing Fee for Options on the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation VIPERs
May 11, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 26, 2006, the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex'' or
``Exchange'') submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by Amex. On May 9, 2006,
the Exchange submitted Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change,
withdrew Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change and submitted
Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change.\3\ Amex has designated
this proposal as one establishing or changing a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the self-regulatory organization under Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \4\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\5\
which renders it effective upon filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Partial Amendment No. 2.
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify its Options Fee Schedule by
adopting a per contract licensing fee for the orders of specialists,
registered options traders (``ROTs''), firms, non-member market makers,
and broker-dealers in connection with options transactions on the
shares of the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation VIPERs (symbol: VIG).
The text of the proposed rule change, as amended, is available on
the Amex's Web site at https://www.amex.com, at the principal office of
the Amex, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, Amex included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. Amex has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Amex proposes to adopt a per contract licensing fee for options on
VIG. This fee change will be assessed on members commencing April 27,
2006.
The Exchange has entered into numerous agreements with various
index providers for the purpose of trading options on certain exchange
traded funds (``ETFs''), such as VIG. This requirement to pay an index
license fee to a third party is a condition to the listing and trading
of these ETF options. In many cases, the Exchange is required to pay a
significant licensing fee to the index provider that may not be
reimbursed. In an effort to recoup the costs associated with certain
index licenses, the Exchange has established a per contract licensing
fee for the orders of specialists, ROTs, firms, non-member market
makers and broker-dealers, which is collected on every option
transaction in designated products in which such market participant is
a party.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52493
(September 22, 2005), 70 FR 56941 (September 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of this proposal is to charge an options licensing fee
in connection with options on VIG. Specifically, Amex seeks to charge
an options licensing fee of $0.10 per contract side for the VIG options
for specialist, ROT, firm, non-member market maker and broker-dealer
orders executed on the Exchange. In all cases, the fees will be charged
only to the Exchange members through whom the orders are placed.
The proposed options licensing fee will allow the Exchange to
recoup its costs in connection with the index license fee for the
trading of the VIG options. The fees will be collected on every order
of a specialist, ROT, firm, non-member market maker, and broker-dealer
executed on the Exchange. The Exchange believes that the proposal to
require payment of a per contract licensing fee in connection with the
VIG options by those market participants that are the beneficiaries of
Exchange index license agreements is justified and consistent with the
rules of the Exchange.
The Exchange notes that the Amex, in recent years, has revised a
number of fees to better align Exchange fees with the actual cost of
delivering services and reduce Exchange subsidies of such services.\7\
Amex believes that the implementation of this proposal is consistent
with the reduction and/or elimination of these subsidies. Amex believes
that these fees will help to allocate to those market participants
engaging in transactions in VIG options a fair share of the related
costs of offering such options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 45360
(January 29, 2002), 67 FR 5626 (February 6, 2002); and 44286 (May 9,
2001), 66 FR 27187 (May 16, 2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange asserts that the proposal is equitable as required by
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act.\8\ In
[[Page 28718]]
connection with the adoption of an options licensing fee for VIG
options, the Exchange believes that charging an options licensing fee,
where applicable, to all market participant orders except for customer
orders is reasonable, given the competitive pressures in the industry.
Accordingly, the Exchange seeks, through this proposal, to better align
its transaction charges with the cost of providing products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Section 6(b)(4) of the Act requires that the rules of a
national securities exchange provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members and
issuers and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
Amex believes that the proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \9\ regarding the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among exchange
members and other persons using exchange facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
Amex believes that the proposed rule change, as amended, does not
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change, as amended.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change was filed pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\11\
because it establishes or changes a due, fee, or other charge imposed
by the self-regulatory organization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Amex-2006-39 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2006-39. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Amex. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-Amex-2006-39 and should be submitted on or before June
7, 2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-7461 Filed 5-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P