Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Controls, Telltales and Indicators, 27964-27976 [06-4478]
Download as PDF
27964
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by July 14, 2006.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing state redesignation
requests, EPA’s role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the
criteria of the CAA. In this context, in
the absence of a prior existing
requirement for the State to use
voluntary consensus standards (VCS),
EPA has no authority to disapprove a
redesignation request for failure to use
VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with
applicable law for EPA, when it reviews
a state recommendation, to use VCS in
place of a state request that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA.
Thus, the requirements of section 12(d)
of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: April 28, 2006.
Alan J. Steinberg,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
I
PART 81—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 81
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
I 2. In § 81.333, the table entitled ‘‘New
York-Ozone (8-Hour Standard)’’ is
amended by removing footnote \b\ and
revising the entry for Syracuse to read
as follows:
§ 81.333
*
New York.
*
*
*
*
NEW YORK-OZONE (8-HOUR STANDARD)
Designation a
Category/classification
Designation area
Date 1
*
*
Syracuse, NY:
Cayuga County ...........................
Madison County ..........................
Onondaga County .......................
Oswego County ..........................
*
*
June
June
June
June
*
14,
14,
14,
14,
Date 1
Type
*
2006 ...............
2006. ..............
2006. ..............
2006. ..............
*
Type
*
*
*
*
*
*
Attainment.
Attainment.
Attainment.
Attainment.
*
a Includes
Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified.
1 This date is June 15, 2004, unless otherwise noted.
Final rule; response to petitions
for reconsideration.
ACTION:
[FR Doc. 06–4517 Filed 5–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA–2006–23651]
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with RULES
RIN 2127–AJ81
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards; Controls, Telltales and
Indicators
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:49 May 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
SUMMARY: In a final rule of August 17,
2005, we updated our standard
regulating motor vehicle controls,
telltales and indicators. The standard
specifies requirements for the location,
identification, and illumination of these
items. The rule extended the standard’s
telltale and indicator requirements to
vehicles with a Gross Vehicle Weight
Rating (GVWR) of 4,536 kg (10,000
pounds) and greater, updated the
standard’s requirements for multifunction controls and multi-task
displays to make the requirements
appropriate for advanced systems, and
reorganized the standard to make it
easier to read. In a document published
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
on January 24, 2006, the effective date
and compliance date for requirements
applicable to vehicles under 4,536 kg
(10,000 pounds) GVWR were extended
to September 1, 2006.
In response to the August 17, 2005
final rule, we received four petitions for
reconsideration, from three
organizations. This final rule responds
to those petitions.
DATES: Effective Date: The effective date
of the rule amending 49 CFR 571.101
published at 70 FR 48295, August 17,
2005 was delayed until September 1,
2006 (at 71 FR 3786, January 24, 2006).
The effective date of today’s final rule
is September 1, 2006.
Compliance date: The compliance
date for the extension of the standard’s
telltale and indicator requirements to
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with RULES
vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536 kg
(10,000 pounds) or greater is September
1, 2013. The compliance date for S5.4.3
‘‘Each symbol used for the identification
of a telltale, control or indicator must be
in a color that stands out clearly against
the background’’ is September 1, 2011.
The compliance date for all other
requirements is September 1, 2006.
Voluntary compliance is permitted
before those dates.
Petitions for reconsideration: Petitions
for reconsideration of this final rule
must be received not later than June 29,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Petitions for reconsideration
of the final rule must refer to the docket
and notice number set forth above and
be submitted to the Administrator,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20590, with a
copy to Docket Management, Room PL–
401, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
non-legal issues you may call Ms. Gayle
Dalrymple, Office of Crash Avoidance
Standards at (202) 366–5559. Her FAX
number is (202) 366–7002. For legal
issues, you may call Ms. Dorothy
Nakama, Office of the Chief Counsel at
(202) 366–2992. Her FAX number is
(202) 366–3820. You may send mail to
both of these officials at National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC
20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
NHTSA issued the original version of
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 101, Controls and
Displays, in 1967 (32 FR 2408) as one
of the initial FMVSSs. The standard
applies to passenger cars, multipurpose
passenger vehicles (MPVs), trucks, and
buses. The purpose of FMVSS No. 101
is to assure the accessibility and
visibility of motor vehicle controls and
displays under daylight and nighttime
conditions, in order to reduce the safety
hazards caused by the diversion of the
driver’s attention from the driving task,
and by mistakes in selecting controls.
At present, FMVSS No. 101 specifies
requirements for the location (S5.1),
identification (S5.2), and illumination
(S5.3) of various controls and displays.
It specifies that those controls and
displays must be accessible and visible
to a driver properly seated wearing his
or her safety belt. Table 1,
‘‘Identification and Illumination of
Controls,’’ and Table 2, ‘‘Identification
and Illumination of Displays,’’ indicate
which controls and displays are subject
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:49 May 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
to the identification requirements, and
how they are to be identified, colored,
and illuminated.
A. August 17, 2005 Final Rule
In a final rule published in the
Federal Register (70 FR 48295) on
August 17, 2005, NHTSA amended
FMVSS No. 101 by extending the
standard’s telltale and indicator
requirements to vehicles of Gross
Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) 4,536
kilograms (10,000 pounds) and over,
updating the standard’s requirements
for multi-function controls and multitask displays to make the requirements
appropriate for advanced systems, and
reorganizing the standard to make it
easier to read. Table 1 and Table 2
continue to include only those symbols
and words previously specified in the
controls and displays standard or in
another Federal motor vehicle safety
standard. However, both Tables 1 and 2
were reorganized to make the symbols
and words easier to find.
The final rule specified an effective
date of February 13, 2006 for
requirements applicable to passenger
cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles,
trucks and buses under 4,536 kg GVWR.
B. Extension of Effective Date
In a petition for reconsideration dated
October 3, 2005, the Alliance of
Automobile Manufacturers (Alliance)
petitioned for a delay in the final rule’s
effective date to September 1, 2006 for
new requirements applicable to
passenger cars, multipurpose passenger
vehicles, trucks and buses under 4,536
kg GVWR. After considering the
petitioner’s explanation for the need to
maintain the status quo while NHTSA
considered several petitions for
reconsideration, NHTSA decided that it
was in the public interest to grant the
Alliance’s petition. In a final rule
published in the Federal Register (71
FR 3786) on January 24, 2006, NHTSA
delayed the effective date of the final
rule from February 13, 2006 to
September 1, 2006.
II. Final Rule; Response to Petitions for
Reconsideration
NHTSA received three petitions for
reconsideration of the August 17, 2005
final rule, from the Truck Manufacturers
Association (TMA), the Association of
International Automobile Manufacturers
(AIAM) and the Alliance. In general, the
petitioners asked NHTSA to reconsider
whether the words ‘‘Trailer ABS’’ or
‘‘Trailer Antilock’’ should be used in
lieu of a symbol specified in Table 1,
asked for reconsideration of whether
symbols must have ‘‘proportional
dimensional characteristics,’’ and for
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
27965
reconsideration of a requirement for
color contrast between symbols and
their backgrounds.
Reconsideration of interior
illumination requirements was also
requested. Finally, the Alliance raised
issues about certain symbols and
footnotes in Tables 1 and 2. The issues
raised in the petitions, and NHTSA’s
response are addressed below.
A. Proportional Dimensional
Characteristics for Identifiers
The August 17, 2005 final rule at
S5.2.1 states: ‘‘If a symbol is used, each
symbol provided pursuant to this
paragraph must have the proportional
dimensional characteristics of the
symbol as it appears in Table 1 or Table
2.’’ The Alliance stated that the quoted
S5.2.1 language is ‘‘more restrictive’’
than the previous requirement that the
symbol be ‘‘substantially similar in
form’’ to the one given in the table. The
Alliance asked that NHTSA revert to the
pre-August 17, 2005 description of the
symbol.
NHTSA grants this part of the
Alliance’s petition. The final rule
language was intended to preserve the
aspect ratio of the graphic so that the
graphic is identifiable in every vehicle.
However, upon review, NHTSA has not
seen examples of current vehicle models
for which apparent differences between
the ‘‘proportional dimensional
characteristics of the symbol’’
requirement versus ‘‘substantially
similar in form’’ requirement would
raise issues. Since there are only 20
symbols in the amended Tables 1 and 2,
we do not believe that continued use of
the ‘‘substantially similar in form’’
requirement would result in any
difference in practical application from
a ‘‘proportional dimensional
characteristics of the symbol’’
requirement.
B. Multiple Levels of Illumination for
Controls and Indicators
The August 17, 2005, final rule at
S5.3.2.1 addresses means of
illuminating the indicators,
identifications of indicators and
identification of controls listed in Table
1 to make them visible to the driver
under daylight and nighttime driving
conditions. S5.3.2.2 in the August 17,
2005 final rule specifies that the means
of providing the visibility required by
S5.3.2.2(a) must be adjustable to provide
at least two levels of brightness.
S5.3.2.2(b) in the August 17, 2005 final
rule states:
At the lower level of brightness, the
identification of controls and indicators must
be barely discernible to the driver who has
adapted to dark ambient roadway condition;
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
27966
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
The requirement that the August 17, 2005
final rule amended was:
S5.3.3(a) Means shall be provided for
making controls, gauges, and the
identification of those items visible to the
driver under all driving conditions.
(b) The means for providing the required
visibility—
(1) Shall be adjustable to provide at least
two levels of brightness, one of which is
barely discernible to a driver who has
adapted to dark ambient roadway conditions.
(2) May be operable manually or
automatically, and
(3) May have levels of brightness at which
those items and identification are not visible.
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with RULES
The Alliance objected to S5.3.2.2(b) in
the August 17, 2005 final rule, stating its
belief that the existing 5.3.3(b)(1) which
provided for ‘‘at least two levels of
brightness, one of which is barely
discernible * * *’’ meant that ‘‘one
level of brightness must be barely
discernible, not necessarily the lowest
level.’’ If two levels are required, and
one must be barely discernible, it is
clearly not acceptable to have the other
of the two required levels of brightness
be lower than barely discernible (in
other words, invisible).
The Alliance is correct; we note,
however, S5.3.2.2 of the August 17,
2005 final rule is internally
contradictory; S5.3.2.2(b) conflicts with
S5.3.2.2(d), ‘‘May have levels of
brightness at which those items and
identifications are not visible.’’
S5.3.2.2(d), a holdover from the old
standard, addresses the manual
adjustment of brightness level by a
rheostat which may turn beyond the
point at which the brightness level goes
to zero. The conflict between S5.3.2.2(b)
and S5.3.2.2(d) is remedied by adding
‘‘visible’’ so that S5.3.2.2(a) reads:
‘‘Must be adjustable to provide at least
two visible levels of brightness;’’ In this
final rule, S5.3.2.2 is amended to read
as follows. No changes are made to
paragraphs (a) and (c). Corresponding
changes are made to paragraphs (b) and
(d) for clarity of the ‘‘visible brightness’’
issue:
S5.3.2.2 The means of providing the
visibility required by S5.3.2.1:
(a) Must be adjustable to provide at least
two visible levels of brightness;
(b) At a level of brightness other than the
highest level, the identification of controls
and indicators must be barely discernible to
the driver who has adapted to dark ambient
roadway condition;
(c) May be operable manually or
automatically; and
(d) May have levels of brightness, other
than the two required visible levels of
brightness, at which those items and
identification are not visible.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:49 May 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
C. Sources of Occupant Compartment
Illumination Forward of the H-Point
The August 17, 2005 final rule at
S5.3.4 Brightness of interior lamps
states:
Any source of illumination that is:
(a) Within the passenger compartment of a
motor vehicle;
(b) Located in front of a transverse vertical
plane 110 mm behind the H-point of the
driver’s seat while it in its rearmost driving
position;
(c) Capable of being activated while the
motor vehicle is in motion; and
(d) Neither a telltale nor a source of
illumination used for the controls and
indicators listed in Table 1 or Table 2, must
have a means for the driver to turn off that
source under the conditions of S5.6.2.
The Alliance and AIAM objected to
the requirement that any source of
illumination forward of the H-point in
the occupant compartment be able to be
turned off. Some manufacturers may not
be able to meet the ‘‘must have a means
for the driver to turn off that source’’
requirement in subparagraph (d)
because some vehicles have light
emitting diodes (LEDs) illuminating
controls on the armrests and center
consoles.
S5.3.4 was intended to cover sources
of illumination such as dome lights,
courtesy lights, and map lights, which
are convenience lighting for the
occupant compartment and are usually
brighter than illumination of controls,
telltales, and indicators, which must
stay on while the vehicle is being
driven. NHTSA notes that subparagraph
(d) should have excluded all telltales,
controls, and indicators, regardless
whether they are specified in FMVSS
No. 101, or are provided at the
manufacturer’s option. NHTSA will
resolve this issue by reverting to the preAugust 17, 2005 language on this
subject, which states:
(a) Any source of illumination within the
passenger compartment which is forward of
a transverse vertical plane 110 mm rearward
of the manikin ‘‘H’’ point with the driver’s
seat in its rearmost driving position, which
is not used for the controls and displays
regulated by this standard, which is not a
telltale, and which is capable of being
illuminated while the vehicle is in motion,
shall have either:
(1) Light intensity which is manually or
automatically adjustable to provide at least
two levels of brightness;
(2) A single intensity that is barely
discernible to a driver who has adapted to
dark ambient roadway conditions; or
(3) A means of being turned off.
(b) Paragraph (a) does not apply to buses
that are normally operated with the
passenger compartment illuminated.
The above quoted provision remains as
S5.3.4, Brightness of interior lamps,
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
which allows certain low intensity
lamps within the driver’s compartment
that cannot be turned off by the driver.
However, NHTSA is aware of an
apparent trend of manufacturers to
incorporate a variety of low intensity
lighting in vehicles to highlight and
illuminate various interior items or
areas, such as: Cup holders, door
handles, foot areas, door pockets, center
consoles, and the like. It is concerned
that the combined effect of a sufficient
number of these various illumination
sources may detrimentally affect
drivers’ night vision and the ability to
adapt to the ‘‘dark ambient roadway
conditions.’’ It is also possible that some
of these multiple illumination sources
may reflect off interior glazing, and
make it difficult to see beyond the
reflection. NHTSA intends to monitor
this trend in interior lighting for the
possibility of safety problems.
D. Color Contrast Between Identifiers
and Their Backgrounds
In the August 17, 2005 final rule, the
requirement that each symbol must be
in a color that stands out clearly against
the background was extended to
identifiers for controls and indicators
(see S5.4.3). The Alliance asked for
reconsideration of this requirement,
stating that not all identifiers are in a
color that stands out clearly against the
background. The Alliance further stated
that it is not needed, citing as an
example the horn identifier. Most
vehicle models use the horn symbol as
the identifier, which is molded into the
air bag cover, without a color ‘‘that
stands out clearly against the
background’’ filled in. The Alliance
commented that: ‘‘The symbol is the
same color as the background, but it can
still be recognized because the
embossment stands out against the
background.’’
NHTSA notes that over the years,
agency staff have taken numerous
telephone calls from drivers
complaining that they cannot locate the
horn control. NHTSA’s Office of Defects
Investigation ARTEMIS database has
recorded 120 complaints from
consumers reporting trouble locating the
horn control in the past ten years. Of
these 120 complaints, consumers
reported 12 crashes, nine near misses,
and an allegation of a fatality. For these
reasons, filling in the horn symbol with
a color ‘‘that stands out clearly against
the background’’ would make the horn
control more visible and would help
drivers be able to more readily find the
control. Thus, we are denying this part
of the Alliance’s petition.
To minimize costs on industry
resulting from this requirement, NHTSA
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
is delaying the compliance date to meet
S5.4.3 for five years, to September 1,
2011. NHTSA agrees with the Alliance’s
recommendation for five years to
implement S.5.4.3 to ‘‘allow
manufacturers to implement the
necessary changes on most products
during the planned product changes in
normal product development cycles.’’
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with RULES
E. Prohibition Against Certain Telltales
Sharing a Common Space
The final rule at S5.5.2 prohibits the
telltales for any brake system
malfunction, the air bag malfunction,
the side air bag malfunction, low tire
pressure, passenger air bag off, high
beam, turn signal and seat belt from
being shown in the same common
space. The Alliance objected to the
inclusion of brake system telltales other
than those that are required to be red,
and any side air bag malfunction
telltale, from being included in the list
of telltales specified at S5.5.2. The
Alliance argued that ‘‘brake system
malfunction’’ is overly broad and may
include telltales voluntarily provided by
the manufacturer. The Alliance further
claimed that the inclusion of the side
impact air bag telltale in S5.5.2 is
inconsistent with a July 30, 1996
NHTSA interpretation letter to Porsche
Cars North America.
Upon further review, the agency has
been persuaded by the Alliance’s
comments. Thus, in this final rule,
S5.5.2 is amended to limit the
prohibition to brake system
malfunctions required by Table 1 to be
red. The side air bag malfunction telltale
is removed.
F. Changes to Table 1
The Alliance and the TMA petitioned
for several changes to Table 1. Some of
the changes were on the order of
technical corrections, others were
substantive. The requests for changes,
and NHTSA’s responses are provided
below.
Highbeam and Turn signals telltales—
The Alliance petitioned that the
highbeam and turn signals telltales in
Table 1 be accompanied by a footnote
indicating that there are additional
requirements in FMVSS No. 108.
NHTSA agrees that including the
footnote would add clarity to the
provisions for highbeam and turn
signals telltales. In this final rule, we
have added a new footnote 2 that states:
‘‘Additional requirements in FMVSS
108.’’
Position, side marker, and/or endoutline marker lamps controls—
Although described in Table 1 as
position, side marker, and/or endoutline marker lamps controls, FMVSS
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:49 May 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
No. 108 still refers to these lamps as
side marker and clearance lamps. The
Alliance petitioned that Table 1
reference the language in FMVSS No.
108.
In partial grant of the Alliance’s
petition, in this final rule, we amend the
description of the item in column 1 to
read: ‘‘Position, side marker, endoutline marker, identification, or
clearance lamps.’’ The description now
includes all possible names for these
lamps and the way the identifier may be
used.
Windshield wiping system
(continuous)—The Alliance petitioned
that the description of this item in
column 1 in Table 1 revert to
description used in the pre-August 17,
2005 version of Table 1.
The note ‘‘(continuous)’’ was
proposed in the NPRM for the wiper to
differentiate it from another identifier
that was proposed for the interval wipe
function. That other interval wipe
function identifier was not adopted in
the August 17, 2005 final rule. Thus, in
Table 1 in the final rule, NHTSA should
have removed the ‘‘(continuous)’’ note
because manufacturers may use the
windshield wiping system identifier for
any wiper function (including
continuous and interval) except wash/
wipe. In this final rule, ‘‘(continuous)’’
is removed from column 1 of
‘‘Windshield wiping system.’’
Brake system malfunction may
include stop lamp failure—The Alliance
stated its belief that the phrase ‘‘may
include Stop Lamp failure’’ actually
refers to an FMVSS No. 105 Hydraulic
and electric brake systems requirement
for systems that do not incorporate a
split brake system to provide the
following warning: ‘‘STOP—BRAKE
FAILURE.’’ The Alliance therefore
recommended removing ‘‘may include
Stop Lamp failure’’ and adding ‘‘STOPBRAKE FAILURE’’ to Column 3 with a
new footnote indicating that ‘‘STOPBRAKE FAILURE’’ applies to vehicles
without split brake systems.
NHTSA notes that the phrase ‘‘may
include Stop Lamp failure’’ does not
refer to the FMVSS No. 105 warning,
but instead came from melding
European Union (EU) directives with
FMVSS No. 101. In this final rule, ‘‘may
include Stop Lamp failure’’ is removed.
NHTSA has decided not to add this to
Column 3.
‘‘Antilock brake system malfunction
for vehicles subject to FMVSS 105 or
135’’ and ‘‘Malfunction in antilock
system for vehicles other than trailers
subject to FMVSS No. 121’’—The
Alliance said that these two telltales
appear to be redundant, and suggested
that by adding a reference to FMVSS
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
27967
No. 121 in the ‘‘Antilock brake system
malfunction for vehicles subject to
FMVSS 105 or 135’’ item, the
‘‘Malfunction in antilock system for
vehicles other than trailers subject to
FMVSS No. 121’’ item may be removed.
The Alliance also suggested adding
parentheses 1 for consistency with the
rest of Table 1.
NHTSA has decided not to make
these changes. The two referenced items
are not redundant. Each item refers to
different vehicles and Column 3 in each
item, while similar, are not identical.
The parentheses will also not be added
because the phrases in Column 1
indicate why two different lines are
used in Table 1. These phrases are part
of the name of the item.
Antilock brake system trailer fault for
vehicles subject to FMVSS 121—TMA
petitioned for the use of one of two
specified symbols (described in its
petition) as an identifier for the trailer
antilock braking system (ABS) warning
telltale, in lieu of ‘‘Trailer ABS’’ or
‘‘Trailer Antilock,’’ the words specified
in the August 17, 2005 final rule. TMA
stated that a symbol is necessary for
harmonization with Canada. Under
Canadian regulations, if words are used,
they must be stated in both English and
French. TMA stated that words in dual
languages would take up too much
space on the truck instrument panel.
TMA further stated that each of trailer
antilock braking system (ABS) warning
telltales they described ‘‘have been
accepted by both Canadian officials and
truck operators.’’
NHTSA notes that one of the symbols
described in TMA’s petition is a symbol
that had been proposed by NHTSA in
the FMVSS No. 101 notice of proposed
rulemaking published on September 23,
2003 (68 FR 55217). The symbol at issue
appears at 68 FR 55229, in row 9,
column 2. Column 1 describes the item
as ‘‘Antilock brake system trailer fault.’’
After considering TMA’s petition,
NHTSA has decided to adopt the
symbol. NHTSA is aware that in
commenters to the September 2003
NPRM cautioned against the use of
symbols that are not intuitively evident.
The symbol we are adopting should not
be of concern for the following reasons.
First, since this symbol will only appear
on commercial vehicles, it will be seen
only by drivers with commercial
drivers’ licenses (CDLs), not by ordinary
drivers. Second, the symbol suggested
by the TMA is already used on many
tractor trailers, and so should be
1 So that the combined item reads: ‘‘Antilock
brake system malfunction (for vehicle subject to
FMVSS 105, 121 or 135).’’
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
27968
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with RULES
familiar to drivers with CDLs.2 Third,
NHTSA is providing in effect more than
a seven year lead time for use of the
symbol and/or the words ‘‘Trailer ABS’’
or ‘‘Trailer Antilock.’’ This leadtime
should be enough time for CDL drivers
to become familiar with the symbol and/
or the words.
We note that the symbol will be
described in Column 1 as ‘‘Antilock
brake system trailer fault for vehicles
subject to FMVSS 121.’’ As provided in
Column 3, at the manufacturer’s option,
the words ‘‘Trailer ABS’’ or ‘‘Trailer
Antilock’’ may be used in lieu of the
symbol. The manufacturer is permitted
to use both the symbol and the English
words specified in column 3.
The Alliance also suggested adding
parentheses to this item 3, to make it
consistent with the Antilock brake
system malfunction for vehicles subject
to FMVSS 105 or 135 item and the
Malfunction in antilock system for
vehicles other than trailers subject to
FMVSS 121 item.
NHTSA has decided not to add
parentheses to this item. The phrases in
Column 1 indicate why two different
lines are used in Table 1. These phrases
are part of the name of the item.
Brake lining wear-out condition (for
vehicles subject to FMVSS 105 or 135)—
The Alliance noted that although this
item references FMVSS No. 105, brake
lining requirements are only specified
in FMVSS No. 135. Thus, the Alliance
recommended removing the reference to
FMVSS 105. In addition, the Alliance
recommended that footnote 3 4 be
applied to this item.
NHTSA agrees with the Alliance on
these issues and will make the changes
in Table 1 in the final rule. Footnote 8
in the August 17, 2005 final rule is
footnote 9 in today’s final rule.
Automatic vehicle speed (cruise
control)—The Alliance noted that the
automatic vehicle speed item includes
‘‘(cruise control).’’ The Alliance
recommended that this item revert to
the way this control is specified in the
pre-August 17, 2005 Table 1.
NHTSA does not believe there is a
need to make this change. The term
2 ‘‘Warning Assessment of Antilock Brake System
(ABS) Malfunction Indicator Lamp Status—A
Snapshot of In-Service Vehicles,’’ Final Report
DOT–FMCSA–MCP/PSV–05–003, January 2005.
3 So that the item reads: ‘‘Antilock brake system
trailer fault (for vehicles subject to FMVSS 121).’’
4 NHTSA believes the reference to footnote 3
(‘‘Blue may be blue-green. Red may be red-orange.’’)
is an error, and the Alliance meant to refer to
footnote 8 (‘‘Refer to FMVSS 105 or FMVSS 135,
as appropriate, for additional specific requirements
for brake telltale labeling and color. If a single
telltale is used to indicate more than one brake
system condition, the brake system malfunction
indicator must be used.’’).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:49 May 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
‘‘cruise control’’ serves to clarify the
meaning of ‘‘automatic vehicle speed’’
control. ‘‘Cruise control’’ is the name by
which most American drivers know the
‘‘automatic vehicle speed’’ control.
‘‘Cruise control’’ appears parenthetically
in Column 1, which is only the name of
the item, not the required identifier
(which would be specified in Column
3).
Automatic transmission control
position or Park, Reverse, Neutral, Drive
(PRND) Indentifiers—Table 1 includes
in column 1, the item ‘‘Automatic
transmission control position’’ with the
words ‘‘(park)’’, ‘‘(reverse)’’, ‘‘(neutral)’’,
and ‘‘(drive)’’ listed vertically next to it.
In column 3 are the abbreviations ‘‘P’’,
‘‘R’’, ‘‘N’’, ‘‘D’’ listed vertically. The
automatic transmission control position
is an indicator. A footnote
accompanying the abbreviation ‘‘PRND’’
states:
Letter ‘D’ may be replaced by other
alphanumeric character or symbol chosen by
the manufacturer. The indicators may be
displayed top to bottom, or left to right, or
both.
The Alliance stated that it was
confused by the new footnote. The
Alliance correctly pointed out that
automatic transmission control position
is regulated in FMVSS No. 102,
Transmission shift position sequence,
starter interlock, and transmission
braking effect. FMVSS No. 102 does not
specify specific labels for each
transmission position, but specifies that
a neutral position shall be located
between drive and reverse and, if a
column-mounted lever is used,
movement from neutral to drive must be
clockwise. If a park position is
provided, it must be ‘‘at the end,
adjacent to the reverse’’ position. The
pre-August 17, 2005 version of FMVSS
No. 101 only required that the
‘‘automatic gear position’’ be
illuminated and did not specify
identifiers for the positions or the
indicator as a whole. The specification
for the automatic transmission control
position in the final rule is identical to
that proposed in the NPRM. No
commenter objected to the automatic
transmission control position proposed
in the NPRM.
In its petition for reconsideration, the
Alliance stated:
* * * several vehicle manufacturers have
issues with limiting the orientation of the
control position (PRND). With the
introduction of shift-by-wire technology,
some vehicle manufacturers have already
introduced this technology and identified a
separate lever of the steering column
dedicated to the automatic transmission
control position (PRND) with the following
orientations:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
R
P–N
D
R
N–P
D
P–R
N
D
The Alliance asked if any of the PRND
orientations described above would not
be permitted in the new FMVSS No. 101
final rule, and how automatic
transmissions without a park position
are to be identified.5 The Alliance also
petitioned that Table 1 be amended to
list only ‘‘P’’, ‘‘R’’ and ‘‘N’’, since
NHTSA already allows manufacturers to
substitute a letter or graphic of their
choice for ‘‘D’’.
In response to the Alliance’s petition,
NHTSA will amend the footnote
accompanying the automatic
transmission control position item 6 in
Table 1 to:
The letters ‘‘P’’, ‘‘R’’, ‘‘N’’, and ‘‘D’’ are
considered separate identifiers for the gear
positions, park, reverse, neutral and drive,
respectively. The locations of these gear
positions, within the vehicle and with
respect to each other, are governed by
FMVSS No. 102. The letter ‘‘D’’ may be
replaced by another alphanumeric character
or symbol chosen by the manufacturer.
NHTSA will not change the ‘‘PRND’’
abbreviation in column 3 because it is
highly recognized by drivers.7 Changing
it to ‘‘PRN’’ may mislead some to
believe it refers to an item other that the
automatic transmission control position.
Low Tire Pressure (including
malfunction) (see FMVSS 138), Low Tire
Pressure (including malfunction) that
identifies involved tire (See FMVSS 138)
and Tire Pressure Monitoring System
Malfunction (See FMVSS 138)—The
Alliance recommended that the
parenthetical phrase ‘‘(including
malfunction)’’ for two of the items be
removed from Column 1, and referred to
in a footnote, as part of recommended
changes to footnote 13.8 The Alliance
noted that ‘‘Tire Pressure Monitoring
System Malfunction (See FMVSS 138)’’
refers to footnote 14.9 The Alliance
5 The Alliance appears to be asking for an
interpretation of transmission shift positions,
regulated in FMVSS No. 102, Transmission shift
position sequence, starter interlock, and
transmission braking effect. We note that in an
¨
August 1, 2002 interpretation letter to Lemforder
Corporation, NHTSA addressed shift positions that
include a ‘‘park’’ position, specifically addressing
S3.1.1 that states: ‘‘if the transmission shift lever
sequence includes a park position, it shall be
located at the end, adjacent to the reverse drive
position.’’
6 Which will be designated as footnote 13.
7 See ‘‘Comprehension Testing for In-vehicle
Symbols’’; Campbell et al, Battelle Human Factors
Transportation Center for The Alliance of
Automobile Manufacturers; September 7, 2005.
8 In Table 1 published on August 17, 2005,
footnote 13 stated: ‘‘Required only for FMVSS
compliant vehicles.’’
9 In Table 1 published on August 17, 2005,
footnote 14 stated: ‘‘Alternatively, either low tire
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
stated its belief that the reference to
‘‘(see FMVSS 138)’’ was sufficient and
suggested combining footnotes 13 and
14 into one footnote that would read:
Required only for FMVSS 138 compliant
vehicles. Alternatively, either low tire
pressure telltale may be used to indicate a
TPMS malfunction.
NHTSA has decided not to make
changes to ‘‘Low Tire Pressure
(including malfunction) (See FMVSS
138),’’ to ‘‘Low Tire Pressure (including
malfunction) that identifies involved
tire (See FMVSS 138)’’ or to ‘‘Tire
Pressure Monitoring System
Malfunction (See FMVSS 138)’’ items.
There are three items related to tire
pressure monitoring in the August 17,
2005 final rule because differing phasein dates for FMVSS No. 138, Tire
pressure monitoring systems (TPMS)
may make simultaneously available,
both vehicles with TPMS that meet
FMVSS No. 138 and vehicles with
TMPS that are not required to meet
FMVSS No. 138. Depending on the
FMVSS No. 138 compliance status of
the vehicle, the tire pressure monitoring
item from Table 1 used in the vehicle
will differ.
Footnote 11—In Table 1 in the August
17, 2005 final rule, Footnote 11
accompanied the Speedometer item.
Footnote 11 stated: ‘‘If the speedometer
is graduated in miles per hour and in
kilometers per hour, the identification
must be ‘‘MPH and km/h’’ in any
combination of upper and lowercase
letters.’’ The Alliance recommended
that ‘‘MPH and km/h’’ be amended to
read ‘‘ ‘MPH’ and ‘km/h’.’’
NHTSA agrees with the Alliance’s
recommendation. In the final rule, in
Table 1, the footnote, which is now
designated as footnote 12, reads: ‘‘If the
speedometer is graduated in both miles
per hour and kilometers per hour, the
scales must be identified ‘‘MPH’’ and
‘‘km/h’’, respectively, in any
combination of upper and lower case
letters.’’
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with RULES
G. Table 2
The Alliance also petitioned for
changes to the following two items in
Table 2:
Odometer—For the odometer item,
the Alliance petitioned to add a footnote
stating that the letters may be any
combination of upper and lower case.
NHTSA concurs. Therefore, in this final
rule, the odometer item in Table 2 will
include a footnote 2 that reads: ‘‘Any
combination of upper- or lowercase
letters may be used.’’
pressure telltale may be used to indicate a TPMS
malfunction. See FMVSS 138.’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:49 May 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
Headlamps and Taillamps Control—
In the August 17, 2005 final rule, the
headlamps and taillamps control, in
Table 2, included footnote 3 which
reads: ‘‘If a line appears in Column 2
and Column 3, the Control, Telltale or
Indicator is required to be identified,
however the form of the identification is
the manufacturer’s option’’ and footnote
4 which reads: ‘‘Separate identification
not required if function is combined
with Master Lighting Switch.’’ The
Alliance suggested that if footnotes 3
and 4 are moved to Column 1, footnote
3 can be simplified. The Alliance
apparently believes the ‘‘first sentence’’
is not necessary.
NHTSA has decided not to adopt the
Alliance’s suggested changes. We are
not removing footnotes 3 and 4 for the
headlamps and taillamps control item,
since the footnotes refer to the words or
abbreviations needed to identify the
item.
III. Leadtime
In the final rule; delay of effective
date document of January 24, 2006,
NHTSA delayed the effective date of the
FMVSS No. 101 final rule to September
1, 2006. Subsequently, in a document
dated March 10, 2006, the AIAM
petitioned for reconsideration of the
January 24, 2006 final rule, primarily
asking that NHTSA address the issues in
the petitions for reconsideration by the
AIAM and other petitioners by
September 1, 2006 and publish ‘‘as soon
as possible prior to September 1 a notice
establishing a more appropriate effective
date, consistent with the pending
petitions.’’
In this document, we address AIAM’s
concerns. This final rule; response to
petitions for reconsideration is
published well in advance of September
1, 2006. In addition, as earlier
explained, so that this final rule can be
implemented at minimal cost, we are
providing a little more than five years’
leadtime to implement S5.4.3, ‘‘Each
symbol used for the identification of a
telltale, control or indicator must be in
a color that stands out clearly against
the background.’’ Today’s final rule
amends the FMVSS No. 101 final rule
published on August 17, 2005 and
becomes effective September 1, 2006,
for vehicles under 10,000 pounds. The
compliance date for S5.4.3 is September
1, 2011.
IV. Statutory Bases for the Rulemaking
We have issued this final rule
pursuant to our statutory authority.
Under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301, Motor
Vehicle Safety (49 U.S.C. 30101 et seq.),
the Secretary of Transportation is
responsible for prescribing motor
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
27969
vehicle safety standards that are
practicable, meet the need for motor
vehicle safety, and are stated in
objective terms. 49 U.S.C. 30111(a).
When prescribing such standards, the
Secretary must consider all relevant,
available motor vehicle safety
information. 49 U.S.C. 30111(b). The
Secretary must also consider whether a
proposed standard is reasonable,
practicable, and appropriate for the type
of motor vehicle or motor vehicle
equipment for which it is prescribed
and the extent to which the standard
will further the statutory purpose of
reducing traffic accidents and deaths
and injuries resulting from traffic
accidents. Id. Responsibility for
promulgation of Federal motor vehicle
safety standards was subsequently
delegated to NHTSA. 49 U.S.C. 105 and
322; delegation of authority at 49 CFR
1.50.
As a Federal agency, before
promulgating changes to a Federal
motor vehicle safety standard, NHTSA
also has a statutory responsibility to
follow the informal rulemaking
procedures mandated in the
Administrative Procedure Act at 5
U.S.C. 553. Among these requirements
are Federal Register publication of a
general notice of proposed rulemaking,
and giving interested persons an
opportunity to participate in the
rulemaking through submission of
written data, views or arguments. After
consideration of the public comments,
we must incorporate into the rules
adopted, a concise general statement of
the rule’s basis and purpose.
The agency has carefully considered
these statutory requirements in
promulgating this final rule to amend
FMVSS No. 101. As previously
discussed in detail, we have solicited
public comment in an NPRM and have
carefully considered the public
comments before issuing this final rule.
As a result, we believe that this final
rule reflects consideration of all relevant
available motor vehicle safety
information. Consideration of all these
statutory factors has resulted in the
following decisions in this final rule. In
this final rule, NHTSA permits use of a
symbol suggested by the TMA in lieu of
the words ‘‘Trailer ABS’’ or ‘‘Trailer
Antilock’’ in identifying the ‘‘Antilock
brake system trailer fault for vehicles
subject to FMVSS 121’’ telltale, does not
require manufacturers to provide a
means to shut off various sources of
interior illumination based on light
emitting diodes, and agrees to changes
to Tables 1 and 2 suggested by the
Alliance. This final rule requires
symbols to be ‘‘substantially similar in
form to the symbol as it appears in
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
27970
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Table 1 or Table 2’’ and for the horn
symbol to have a color contrast with its
background. So that the color contrast
requirement can be implemented at
minimal cost to industry, for vehicles
with a GVWR under 10,000 pounds, this
final rule delays from September 1, 2006
to September 1, 2011, the effective date
for the FMVSS No 101 final rule
published on August 17, 2005. For
vehicles under 10,000 pounds, the
changes made in today’s final rule will
also take effect on September 1, 2011.
Also, because the safety benefits of this
final rule are very small, there will be
no measurable effect on safety as a
result of the delay in effective date.
As indicated, we have thoroughly
reviewed the public comments and
adopted a final rule in light of
comments. In the instances where we
did not adopt a comment, we explain
why we did not adopt the comment.
V. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with RULES
A. Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993), provides for making
determinations whether a regulatory
action is ‘‘significant’’ and therefore
subject to Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) review and to the
requirements of the Executive Order.
The Order defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as one that is likely
to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations or recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.
We have considered the impact of this
rulemaking action under Executive
Order 12866 and the Department of
Transportation’s regulatory policies and
procedures. This rulemaking document
was not reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget under E.O.
12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review.’’ The rulemaking action is also
not considered to be significant under
the Department’s Regulatory Policies
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:49 May 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979).
For the following reasons, NHTSA
concludes that this final rule will not
have any quantifiable cost effect on
motor vehicle manufacturers. In this
final rule, NHTSA permits the use of a
symbol suggested by the TMA in lieu of
the words ‘‘Trailer ABS’’ or ‘‘Trailer
Antilock’’ in identifying the ‘‘Antilock
brake system trailer fault for vehicles
subject to FMVSS 121’’ telltale, does not
require manufacturers to provide a
means to shut off various sources of
interior illumination based on light
emitting diodes, and agrees to changes
to Tables 1 and 2 suggested by the
Alliance. This final rule requires
symbols to be ‘‘substantially similar in
form to the symbol as it appears in
Table 1 and Table 2’’ and for the horn
symbol to have a color contrast with its
background. So that the color contrast
requirement can be implemented at
minimal cost to industry, for vehicles
with a GVWR under 10,000 pounds, this
final rule delays from September 1, 2006
to September 1, 2011, the compliance
date for S5.4.3 ‘‘Each symbol used for
the identification of a telltale, control or
indicator must be in a color that stands
out clearly against the background.’’
There will be no measurable effect on
safety as a result of this delay in
compliance date for S5.4.3.
Because the economic effects of this
final rule are so minimal, no further
regulatory evaluation is necessary.
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
I have considered the effects of this
rulemaking action under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) and
certify that this final rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The statement of the factual basis for the
certification is that for vehicles under
10,000 pounds GVWR, this final rule
delays until September 1, 2011, the
compliance date of a provision in the
final rule published on August 17, 2005,
that requires symbols used in
identification of telltales, controls or
indicators to be in a color that ‘‘stands
out clearly against the background.’’ As
earlier stated, small business
manufacturers will incur costs that are
so minimal as to be unquantifiable as a
result of this final rule.
For these reasons, and for the reasons
described in our discussion on
Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures,
NHTSA concludes that this final rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
NHTSA has analyzed this rule in
accordance with the principles and
criteria set forth in Executive Order
13132, Federalism and has determined
that it does not have sufficient
Federalism implications to warrant
consultation with State and local
officials or the preparation of a
Federalism summary impact statement.
The rule will not have any substantial
impact on the States, or on the current
Federal-State relationship, or on the
current distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various local
officials.
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of
1996), whenever an agency is required
to publish a notice of rulemaking for
any proposed or final rule, it must
prepare and make available for public
comment a regulatory flexibility
analysis that describes the effect of the
rule on small entities (i.e., small
businesses, small organizations, and
small governmental jurisdictions). The
Small Business Administration’s
regulations at 13 CFR part 121 define a
small business, in part, as a business
entity ‘‘which operates primarily within
the United States.’’ (13 CFR 121.105(a)).
No regulatory flexibility analysis is
required if the head of an agency
certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The SBREFA amended the Regulatory
Flexibility Act to require Federal
agencies to provide a statement of the
factual basis for certifying that a rule
will not have a significant economic
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
C. National Environmental Policy Act
NHTSA has analyzed this rulemaking
action for the purposes of the National
Environmental Policy Act. The agency
has determined that implementation of
this action will not have any significant
impact on the quality of the human
environment.
E. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
Pursuant to Executive Order 12988
‘‘Civil Justice Reform,’’ we have
considered whether this final rule
would have any retroactive effect.
NHTSA concludes that this final rule
will not have any retroactive effect.
Under 49 U.S.C. 30103, whenever a
Federal motor vehicle safety standard is
in effect, a State may not adopt or
maintain a safety standard applicable to
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
the same aspect of performance which
is not identical to the Federal standard,
except to the extent that the state
requirement imposes a higher level of
performance and applies only to
vehicles procured for the State’s use. 49
U.S.C. 30161 sets forth a procedure for
judicial review of final rules
establishing, amending, or revoking
Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
That section does not require
submission of a petition for
reconsideration or other administrative
proceedings before parties may file suit
in court.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
by a Federal agency unless the
collection displays a valid Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) control
number. This final rule does not require
any collections of information, or
recordkeeping or retention requirements
as defined by the OMB in 5 CFR part
1320.
G. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
I. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104–
113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272)
directs NHTSA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless doing so would be
inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary
consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications,
test methods, sampling procedures, and
business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies, such as the Society of
Automotive Engineers (SAE). The
NTTAA directs the agency to provide
Congress, through the OMB,
explanations when we decide not to use
available and applicable voluntary
consensus standards.
After conducting a search of available
sources, we have determined that there
is no applicable voluntary consensus
standard for this final rule.
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with RULES
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires Federal agencies to prepare a
written assessment of the costs, benefits,
and other effects of proposed or final
rules that include a Federal mandate
likely to result in the expenditure by
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:49 May 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
State, local or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
more than $100 million in any one year
(adjusted for inflation with base year of
1995). Before promulgating a rule for
which a written statement is needed,
section 205 of the UMRA generally
requires NHTSA to identify and
consider a reasonable number of
regulatory alternatives and adopt the
least costly, most cost-effective, or least
burdensome alternative that achieves
the objectives of the rule. The
provisions of section 205 do not apply
when they are inconsistent with
applicable law. Moreover, section 205
allows NHTSA to adopt an alternative
other than the least costly, most costeffective or least burdensome alternative
if the agency publishes with the final
rule an explanation why that alternative
was not adopted.
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector of more than $100 million
annually. Accordingly, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections
202 and 205 of the UMRA.
The Department of Transportation
assigns a regulation identifier number
(RIN) to each regulatory action listed in
the Unified Agenda of Federal
Regulations. The Regulatory Information
Service Center publishes the Unified
Agenda in April and October of each
year. You may use the RIN contained in
the heading at the beginning of this
document to find this action in the
Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 571
Imports, Motor vehicle safety, Motor
vehicles, Rubber and rubber products,
and Tires.
In consideration of the foregoing,
NHTSA amends 49 CFR part 571 as
follows:
I
PART 571—FEDERAL MOTOR
VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARDS
1. The authority citation for part 571
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, 30115,
30166, and 30177; delegation of authority at
49 CFR 1.50.
2. In § 571.101, the second sentence of
S5.2.1, paragraph (b) and the
introductory text of paragraph (d) of
S5.3.2.2, S5.3.4, S5.5.2, and Tables 1
and 2 are revised, and a new sentence
I
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
27971
is added to the end of S5.4.3 to read as
follows:
§ 571.101 Standard No. 101, Controls,
telltales, and indicators.
*
*
*
*
*
S5.2.1 * * * If a symbol is used,
each symbol provided pursuant to this
paragraph must be substantially similar
in form to the symbol as it appears in
Table 1 or Table 2. * * *
S5.3.2.2 * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(b) At a level of brightness other than
the highest level, the identification of
controls and indicators must be barely
discernible to the driver who has
adapted to dark ambient roadway
condition;
*
*
*
*
*
(d) May have levels of brightness,
other than the two required visible
levels of brightness, at which those
items and identification are not visible.
*
*
*
*
*
S5.3.4 Brightness of interior lamps.
(a) Any source of illumination within
the passenger compartment which is
forward of a transverse vertical plane
110 mm rearward of the manikin ‘‘H’’
point with the driver’s seat in its
rearmost driving position, which is not
used for the controls and displays
regulated by this standard, which is not
a telltale, and which is capable of being
illuminated while the vehicle is in
motion, shall have either:
(1) Light intensity which is manually
or automatically adjustable to provide at
least two levels of brightness;
(2) A single intensity that is barely
discernible to a driver who has adapted
to dark ambient roadway conditions;or
(3) A means of being turned off.
(b) Paragraph (a) of S5.3.4 does not
apply to buses that are normally
operated with the passenger
compartment illuminated.
*
*
*
*
*
S5.4.3 * * * For vehicles with a
GVWR of under 4,536 kg (10,000
pounds), the compliance date for this
provision is September 1, 2011.
*
*
*
*
*
S5.5.2 The telltales for any brake
system malfunction required by Table 1
to be red, air bag malfunction, low tire
pressure, passenger air bag off, high
beam, turn signal, and seat belt must not
be shown in the same common space.
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
21:49 May 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
ER15MY06.031
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with RULES
27972
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:49 May 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
27973
ER15MY06.032
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
21:49 May 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
ER15MY06.033
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with RULES
27974
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:49 May 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
27975
ER15MY06.034
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
27976
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Issued on: May 9, 2006.
Jacqueline Glassman,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 06–4478 Filed 5–12–06; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:49 May 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
ER15MY06.035
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with RULES
BILLING CODE 4910–59–C
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 93 (Monday, May 15, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27964-27976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-4478]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA-2006-23651]
RIN 2127-AJ81
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Controls, Telltales and
Indicators
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; response to petitions for reconsideration.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In a final rule of August 17, 2005, we updated our standard
regulating motor vehicle controls, telltales and indicators. The
standard specifies requirements for the location, identification, and
illumination of these items. The rule extended the standard's telltale
and indicator requirements to vehicles with a Gross Vehicle Weight
Rating (GVWR) of 4,536 kg (10,000 pounds) and greater, updated the
standard's requirements for multi-function controls and multi-task
displays to make the requirements appropriate for advanced systems, and
reorganized the standard to make it easier to read. In a document
published on January 24, 2006, the effective date and compliance date
for requirements applicable to vehicles under 4,536 kg (10,000 pounds)
GVWR were extended to September 1, 2006.
In response to the August 17, 2005 final rule, we received four
petitions for reconsideration, from three organizations. This final
rule responds to those petitions.
DATES: Effective Date: The effective date of the rule amending 49 CFR
571.101 published at 70 FR 48295, August 17, 2005 was delayed until
September 1, 2006 (at 71 FR 3786, January 24, 2006). The effective date
of today's final rule is September 1, 2006.
Compliance date: The compliance date for the extension of the
standard's telltale and indicator requirements to
[[Page 27965]]
vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536 kg (10,000 pounds) or greater is
September 1, 2013. The compliance date for S5.4.3 ``Each symbol used
for the identification of a telltale, control or indicator must be in a
color that stands out clearly against the background'' is September 1,
2011. The compliance date for all other requirements is September 1,
2006. Voluntary compliance is permitted before those dates.
Petitions for reconsideration: Petitions for reconsideration of
this final rule must be received not later than June 29, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Petitions for reconsideration of the final rule must refer
to the docket and notice number set forth above and be submitted to the
Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, with a copy to Docket
Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For non-legal issues you may call Ms.
Gayle Dalrymple, Office of Crash Avoidance Standards at (202) 366-5559.
Her FAX number is (202) 366-7002. For legal issues, you may call Ms.
Dorothy Nakama, Office of the Chief Counsel at (202) 366-2992. Her FAX
number is (202) 366-3820. You may send mail to both of these officials
at National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh St.,
SW., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
NHTSA issued the original version of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 101, Controls and Displays, in 1967 (32 FR 2408)
as one of the initial FMVSSs. The standard applies to passenger cars,
multipurpose passenger vehicles (MPVs), trucks, and buses. The purpose
of FMVSS No. 101 is to assure the accessibility and visibility of motor
vehicle controls and displays under daylight and nighttime conditions,
in order to reduce the safety hazards caused by the diversion of the
driver's attention from the driving task, and by mistakes in selecting
controls.
At present, FMVSS No. 101 specifies requirements for the location
(S5.1), identification (S5.2), and illumination (S5.3) of various
controls and displays. It specifies that those controls and displays
must be accessible and visible to a driver properly seated wearing his
or her safety belt. Table 1, ``Identification and Illumination of
Controls,'' and Table 2, ``Identification and Illumination of
Displays,'' indicate which controls and displays are subject to the
identification requirements, and how they are to be identified,
colored, and illuminated.
A. August 17, 2005 Final Rule
In a final rule published in the Federal Register (70 FR 48295) on
August 17, 2005, NHTSA amended FMVSS No. 101 by extending the
standard's telltale and indicator requirements to vehicles of Gross
Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) and over,
updating the standard's requirements for multi-function controls and
multi-task displays to make the requirements appropriate for advanced
systems, and reorganizing the standard to make it easier to read. Table
1 and Table 2 continue to include only those symbols and words
previously specified in the controls and displays standard or in
another Federal motor vehicle safety standard. However, both Tables 1
and 2 were reorganized to make the symbols and words easier to find.
The final rule specified an effective date of February 13, 2006 for
requirements applicable to passenger cars, multipurpose passenger
vehicles, trucks and buses under 4,536 kg GVWR.
B. Extension of Effective Date
In a petition for reconsideration dated October 3, 2005, the
Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers (Alliance) petitioned for a delay
in the final rule's effective date to September 1, 2006 for new
requirements applicable to passenger cars, multipurpose passenger
vehicles, trucks and buses under 4,536 kg GVWR. After considering the
petitioner's explanation for the need to maintain the status quo while
NHTSA considered several petitions for reconsideration, NHTSA decided
that it was in the public interest to grant the Alliance's petition. In
a final rule published in the Federal Register (71 FR 3786) on January
24, 2006, NHTSA delayed the effective date of the final rule from
February 13, 2006 to September 1, 2006.
II. Final Rule; Response to Petitions for Reconsideration
NHTSA received three petitions for reconsideration of the August
17, 2005 final rule, from the Truck Manufacturers Association (TMA),
the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers (AIAM) and
the Alliance. In general, the petitioners asked NHTSA to reconsider
whether the words ``Trailer ABS'' or ``Trailer Antilock'' should be
used in lieu of a symbol specified in Table 1, asked for
reconsideration of whether symbols must have ``proportional dimensional
characteristics,'' and for reconsideration of a requirement for color
contrast between symbols and their backgrounds.
Reconsideration of interior illumination requirements was also
requested. Finally, the Alliance raised issues about certain symbols
and footnotes in Tables 1 and 2. The issues raised in the petitions,
and NHTSA's response are addressed below.
A. Proportional Dimensional Characteristics for Identifiers
The August 17, 2005 final rule at S5.2.1 states: ``If a symbol is
used, each symbol provided pursuant to this paragraph must have the
proportional dimensional characteristics of the symbol as it appears in
Table 1 or Table 2.'' The Alliance stated that the quoted S5.2.1
language is ``more restrictive'' than the previous requirement that the
symbol be ``substantially similar in form'' to the one given in the
table. The Alliance asked that NHTSA revert to the pre-August 17, 2005
description of the symbol.
NHTSA grants this part of the Alliance's petition. The final rule
language was intended to preserve the aspect ratio of the graphic so
that the graphic is identifiable in every vehicle. However, upon
review, NHTSA has not seen examples of current vehicle models for which
apparent differences between the ``proportional dimensional
characteristics of the symbol'' requirement versus ``substantially
similar in form'' requirement would raise issues. Since there are only
20 symbols in the amended Tables 1 and 2, we do not believe that
continued use of the ``substantially similar in form'' requirement
would result in any difference in practical application from a
``proportional dimensional characteristics of the symbol'' requirement.
B. Multiple Levels of Illumination for Controls and Indicators
The August 17, 2005, final rule at S5.3.2.1 addresses means of
illuminating the indicators, identifications of indicators and
identification of controls listed in Table 1 to make them visible to
the driver under daylight and nighttime driving conditions. S5.3.2.2 in
the August 17, 2005 final rule specifies that the means of providing
the visibility required by S5.3.2.2(a) must be adjustable to provide at
least two levels of brightness. S5.3.2.2(b) in the August 17, 2005
final rule states:
At the lower level of brightness, the identification of controls
and indicators must be barely discernible to the driver who has
adapted to dark ambient roadway condition;
[[Page 27966]]
The requirement that the August 17, 2005 final rule amended was:
S5.3.3(a) Means shall be provided for making controls, gauges,
and the identification of those items visible to the driver under
all driving conditions.
(b) The means for providing the required visibility--
(1) Shall be adjustable to provide at least two levels of
brightness, one of which is barely discernible to a driver who has
adapted to dark ambient roadway conditions.
(2) May be operable manually or automatically, and
(3) May have levels of brightness at which those items and
identification are not visible.
The Alliance objected to S5.3.2.2(b) in the August 17, 2005 final
rule, stating its belief that the existing 5.3.3(b)(1) which provided
for ``at least two levels of brightness, one of which is barely
discernible * * *'' meant that ``one level of brightness must be barely
discernible, not necessarily the lowest level.'' If two levels are
required, and one must be barely discernible, it is clearly not
acceptable to have the other of the two required levels of brightness
be lower than barely discernible (in other words, invisible).
The Alliance is correct; we note, however, S5.3.2.2 of the August
17, 2005 final rule is internally contradictory; S5.3.2.2(b) conflicts
with S5.3.2.2(d), ``May have levels of brightness at which those items
and identifications are not visible.'' S5.3.2.2(d), a holdover from the
old standard, addresses the manual adjustment of brightness level by a
rheostat which may turn beyond the point at which the brightness level
goes to zero. The conflict between S5.3.2.2(b) and S5.3.2.2(d) is
remedied by adding ``visible'' so that S5.3.2.2(a) reads: ``Must be
adjustable to provide at least two visible levels of brightness;'' In
this final rule, S5.3.2.2 is amended to read as follows. No changes are
made to paragraphs (a) and (c). Corresponding changes are made to
paragraphs (b) and (d) for clarity of the ``visible brightness'' issue:
S5.3.2.2 The means of providing the visibility required by
S5.3.2.1:
(a) Must be adjustable to provide at least two visible levels of
brightness;
(b) At a level of brightness other than the highest level, the
identification of controls and indicators must be barely discernible
to the driver who has adapted to dark ambient roadway condition;
(c) May be operable manually or automatically; and
(d) May have levels of brightness, other than the two required
visible levels of brightness, at which those items and
identification are not visible.
C. Sources of Occupant Compartment Illumination Forward of the H-Point
The August 17, 2005 final rule at S5.3.4 Brightness of interior
lamps states:
Any source of illumination that is:
(a) Within the passenger compartment of a motor vehicle;
(b) Located in front of a transverse vertical plane 110 mm
behind the H-point of the driver's seat while it in its rearmost
driving position;
(c) Capable of being activated while the motor vehicle is in
motion; and
(d) Neither a telltale nor a source of illumination used for the
controls and indicators listed in Table 1 or Table 2, must have a
means for the driver to turn off that source under the conditions of
S5.6.2.
The Alliance and AIAM objected to the requirement that any source
of illumination forward of the H-point in the occupant compartment be
able to be turned off. Some manufacturers may not be able to meet the
``must have a means for the driver to turn off that source''
requirement in subparagraph (d) because some vehicles have light
emitting diodes (LEDs) illuminating controls on the armrests and center
consoles.
S5.3.4 was intended to cover sources of illumination such as dome
lights, courtesy lights, and map lights, which are convenience lighting
for the occupant compartment and are usually brighter than illumination
of controls, telltales, and indicators, which must stay on while the
vehicle is being driven. NHTSA notes that subparagraph (d) should have
excluded all telltales, controls, and indicators, regardless whether
they are specified in FMVSS No. 101, or are provided at the
manufacturer's option. NHTSA will resolve this issue by reverting to
the pre-August 17, 2005 language on this subject, which states:
(a) Any source of illumination within the passenger compartment
which is forward of a transverse vertical plane 110 mm rearward of
the manikin ``H'' point with the driver's seat in its rearmost
driving position, which is not used for the controls and displays
regulated by this standard, which is not a telltale, and which is
capable of being illuminated while the vehicle is in motion, shall
have either:
(1) Light intensity which is manually or automatically
adjustable to provide at least two levels of brightness;
(2) A single intensity that is barely discernible to a driver
who has adapted to dark ambient roadway conditions; or
(3) A means of being turned off.
(b) Paragraph (a) does not apply to buses that are normally
operated with the passenger compartment illuminated.
The above quoted provision remains as S5.3.4, Brightness of interior
lamps, which allows certain low intensity lamps within the driver's
compartment that cannot be turned off by the driver.
However, NHTSA is aware of an apparent trend of manufacturers to
incorporate a variety of low intensity lighting in vehicles to
highlight and illuminate various interior items or areas, such as: Cup
holders, door handles, foot areas, door pockets, center consoles, and
the like. It is concerned that the combined effect of a sufficient
number of these various illumination sources may detrimentally affect
drivers' night vision and the ability to adapt to the ``dark ambient
roadway conditions.'' It is also possible that some of these multiple
illumination sources may reflect off interior glazing, and make it
difficult to see beyond the reflection. NHTSA intends to monitor this
trend in interior lighting for the possibility of safety problems.
D. Color Contrast Between Identifiers and Their Backgrounds
In the August 17, 2005 final rule, the requirement that each symbol
must be in a color that stands out clearly against the background was
extended to identifiers for controls and indicators (see S5.4.3). The
Alliance asked for reconsideration of this requirement, stating that
not all identifiers are in a color that stands out clearly against the
background. The Alliance further stated that it is not needed, citing
as an example the horn identifier. Most vehicle models use the horn
symbol as the identifier, which is molded into the air bag cover,
without a color ``that stands out clearly against the background''
filled in. The Alliance commented that: ``The symbol is the same color
as the background, but it can still be recognized because the
embossment stands out against the background.''
NHTSA notes that over the years, agency staff have taken numerous
telephone calls from drivers complaining that they cannot locate the
horn control. NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation ARTEMIS database
has recorded 120 complaints from consumers reporting trouble locating
the horn control in the past ten years. Of these 120 complaints,
consumers reported 12 crashes, nine near misses, and an allegation of a
fatality. For these reasons, filling in the horn symbol with a color
``that stands out clearly against the background'' would make the horn
control more visible and would help drivers be able to more readily
find the control. Thus, we are denying this part of the Alliance's
petition.
To minimize costs on industry resulting from this requirement,
NHTSA
[[Page 27967]]
is delaying the compliance date to meet S5.4.3 for five years, to
September 1, 2011. NHTSA agrees with the Alliance's recommendation for
five years to implement S.5.4.3 to ``allow manufacturers to implement
the necessary changes on most products during the planned product
changes in normal product development cycles.''
E. Prohibition Against Certain Telltales Sharing a Common Space
The final rule at S5.5.2 prohibits the telltales for any brake
system malfunction, the air bag malfunction, the side air bag
malfunction, low tire pressure, passenger air bag off, high beam, turn
signal and seat belt from being shown in the same common space. The
Alliance objected to the inclusion of brake system telltales other than
those that are required to be red, and any side air bag malfunction
telltale, from being included in the list of telltales specified at
S5.5.2. The Alliance argued that ``brake system malfunction'' is overly
broad and may include telltales voluntarily provided by the
manufacturer. The Alliance further claimed that the inclusion of the
side impact air bag telltale in S5.5.2 is inconsistent with a July 30,
1996 NHTSA interpretation letter to Porsche Cars North America.
Upon further review, the agency has been persuaded by the
Alliance's comments. Thus, in this final rule, S5.5.2 is amended to
limit the prohibition to brake system malfunctions required by Table 1
to be red. The side air bag malfunction telltale is removed.
F. Changes to Table 1
The Alliance and the TMA petitioned for several changes to Table 1.
Some of the changes were on the order of technical corrections, others
were substantive. The requests for changes, and NHTSA's responses are
provided below.
Highbeam and Turn signals telltales--The Alliance petitioned that
the highbeam and turn signals telltales in Table 1 be accompanied by a
footnote indicating that there are additional requirements in FMVSS No.
108. NHTSA agrees that including the footnote would add clarity to the
provisions for highbeam and turn signals telltales. In this final rule,
we have added a new footnote 2 that states: ``Additional requirements
in FMVSS 108.''
Position, side marker, and/or end-outline marker lamps controls--
Although described in Table 1 as position, side marker, and/or end-
outline marker lamps controls, FMVSS No. 108 still refers to these
lamps as side marker and clearance lamps. The Alliance petitioned that
Table 1 reference the language in FMVSS No. 108.
In partial grant of the Alliance's petition, in this final rule, we
amend the description of the item in column 1 to read: ``Position, side
marker, end-outline marker, identification, or clearance lamps.'' The
description now includes all possible names for these lamps and the way
the identifier may be used.
Windshield wiping system (continuous)--The Alliance petitioned that
the description of this item in column 1 in Table 1 revert to
description used in the pre-August 17, 2005 version of Table 1.
The note ``(continuous)'' was proposed in the NPRM for the wiper to
differentiate it from another identifier that was proposed for the
interval wipe function. That other interval wipe function identifier
was not adopted in the August 17, 2005 final rule. Thus, in Table 1 in
the final rule, NHTSA should have removed the ``(continuous)'' note
because manufacturers may use the windshield wiping system identifier
for any wiper function (including continuous and interval) except wash/
wipe. In this final rule, ``(continuous)'' is removed from column 1 of
``Windshield wiping system.''
Brake system malfunction may include stop lamp failure--The
Alliance stated its belief that the phrase ``may include Stop Lamp
failure'' actually refers to an FMVSS No. 105 Hydraulic and electric
brake systems requirement for systems that do not incorporate a split
brake system to provide the following warning: ``STOP--BRAKE FAILURE.''
The Alliance therefore recommended removing ``may include Stop Lamp
failure'' and adding ``STOP-BRAKE FAILURE'' to Column 3 with a new
footnote indicating that ``STOP-BRAKE FAILURE'' applies to vehicles
without split brake systems.
NHTSA notes that the phrase ``may include Stop Lamp failure'' does
not refer to the FMVSS No. 105 warning, but instead came from melding
European Union (EU) directives with FMVSS No. 101. In this final rule,
``may include Stop Lamp failure'' is removed. NHTSA has decided not to
add this to Column 3.
``Antilock brake system malfunction for vehicles subject to FMVSS
105 or 135'' and ``Malfunction in antilock system for vehicles other
than trailers subject to FMVSS No. 121''--The Alliance said that these
two telltales appear to be redundant, and suggested that by adding a
reference to FMVSS No. 121 in the ``Antilock brake system malfunction
for vehicles subject to FMVSS 105 or 135'' item, the ``Malfunction in
antilock system for vehicles other than trailers subject to FMVSS No.
121'' item may be removed. The Alliance also suggested adding
parentheses \1\ for consistency with the rest of Table 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ So that the combined item reads: ``Antilock brake system
malfunction (for vehicle subject to FMVSS 105, 121 or 135).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NHTSA has decided not to make these changes. The two referenced
items are not redundant. Each item refers to different vehicles and
Column 3 in each item, while similar, are not identical. The
parentheses will also not be added because the phrases in Column 1
indicate why two different lines are used in Table 1. These phrases are
part of the name of the item.
Antilock brake system trailer fault for vehicles subject to FMVSS
121--TMA petitioned for the use of one of two specified symbols
(described in its petition) as an identifier for the trailer antilock
braking system (ABS) warning telltale, in lieu of ``Trailer ABS'' or
``Trailer Antilock,'' the words specified in the August 17, 2005 final
rule. TMA stated that a symbol is necessary for harmonization with
Canada. Under Canadian regulations, if words are used, they must be
stated in both English and French. TMA stated that words in dual
languages would take up too much space on the truck instrument panel.
TMA further stated that each of trailer antilock braking system (ABS)
warning telltales they described ``have been accepted by both Canadian
officials and truck operators.''
NHTSA notes that one of the symbols described in TMA's petition is
a symbol that had been proposed by NHTSA in the FMVSS No. 101 notice of
proposed rulemaking published on September 23, 2003 (68 FR 55217). The
symbol at issue appears at 68 FR 55229, in row 9, column 2. Column 1
describes the item as ``Antilock brake system trailer fault.''
After considering TMA's petition, NHTSA has decided to adopt the
symbol. NHTSA is aware that in commenters to the September 2003 NPRM
cautioned against the use of symbols that are not intuitively evident.
The symbol we are adopting should not be of concern for the following
reasons. First, since this symbol will only appear on commercial
vehicles, it will be seen only by drivers with commercial drivers'
licenses (CDLs), not by ordinary drivers. Second, the symbol suggested
by the TMA is already used on many tractor trailers, and so should be
[[Page 27968]]
familiar to drivers with CDLs.\2\ Third, NHTSA is providing in effect
more than a seven year lead time for use of the symbol and/or the words
``Trailer ABS'' or ``Trailer Antilock.'' This leadtime should be enough
time for CDL drivers to become familiar with the symbol and/or the
words.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ ``Warning Assessment of Antilock Brake System (ABS)
Malfunction Indicator Lamp Status--A Snapshot of In-Service
Vehicles,'' Final Report DOT-FMCSA-MCP/PSV-05-003, January 2005.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We note that the symbol will be described in Column 1 as ``Antilock
brake system trailer fault for vehicles subject to FMVSS 121.'' As
provided in Column 3, at the manufacturer's option, the words ``Trailer
ABS'' or ``Trailer Antilock'' may be used in lieu of the symbol. The
manufacturer is permitted to use both the symbol and the English words
specified in column 3.
The Alliance also suggested adding parentheses to this item \3\, to
make it consistent with the Antilock brake system malfunction for
vehicles subject to FMVSS 105 or 135 item and the Malfunction in
antilock system for vehicles other than trailers subject to FMVSS 121
item.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ So that the item reads: ``Antilock brake system trailer
fault (for vehicles subject to FMVSS 121).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NHTSA has decided not to add parentheses to this item. The phrases
in Column 1 indicate why two different lines are used in Table 1. These
phrases are part of the name of the item.
Brake lining wear-out condition (for vehicles subject to FMVSS 105
or 135)--The Alliance noted that although this item references FMVSS
No. 105, brake lining requirements are only specified in FMVSS No. 135.
Thus, the Alliance recommended removing the reference to FMVSS 105. In
addition, the Alliance recommended that footnote 3 \4\ be applied to
this item.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ NHTSA believes the reference to footnote 3 (``Blue may be
blue-green. Red may be red-orange.'') is an error, and the Alliance
meant to refer to footnote 8 (``Refer to FMVSS 105 or FMVSS 135, as
appropriate, for additional specific requirements for brake telltale
labeling and color. If a single telltale is used to indicate more
than one brake system condition, the brake system malfunction
indicator must be used.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NHTSA agrees with the Alliance on these issues and will make the
changes in Table 1 in the final rule. Footnote 8 in the August 17, 2005
final rule is footnote 9 in today's final rule.
Automatic vehicle speed (cruise control)--The Alliance noted that
the automatic vehicle speed item includes ``(cruise control).'' The
Alliance recommended that this item revert to the way this control is
specified in the pre-August 17, 2005 Table 1.
NHTSA does not believe there is a need to make this change. The
term ``cruise control'' serves to clarify the meaning of ``automatic
vehicle speed'' control. ``Cruise control'' is the name by which most
American drivers know the ``automatic vehicle speed'' control. ``Cruise
control'' appears parenthetically in Column 1, which is only the name
of the item, not the required identifier (which would be specified in
Column 3).
Automatic transmission control position or Park, Reverse, Neutral,
Drive (PRND) Indentifiers--Table 1 includes in column 1, the item
``Automatic transmission control position'' with the words ``(park)'',
``(reverse)'', ``(neutral)'', and ``(drive)'' listed vertically next to
it. In column 3 are the abbreviations ``P'', ``R'', ``N'', ``D'' listed
vertically. The automatic transmission control position is an
indicator. A footnote accompanying the abbreviation ``PRND'' states:
Letter `D' may be replaced by other alphanumeric character or
symbol chosen by the manufacturer. The indicators may be displayed
top to bottom, or left to right, or both.
The Alliance stated that it was confused by the new footnote. The
Alliance correctly pointed out that automatic transmission control
position is regulated in FMVSS No. 102, Transmission shift position
sequence, starter interlock, and transmission braking effect. FMVSS No.
102 does not specify specific labels for each transmission position,
but specifies that a neutral position shall be located between drive
and reverse and, if a column-mounted lever is used, movement from
neutral to drive must be clockwise. If a park position is provided, it
must be ``at the end, adjacent to the reverse'' position. The pre-
August 17, 2005 version of FMVSS No. 101 only required that the
``automatic gear position'' be illuminated and did not specify
identifiers for the positions or the indicator as a whole. The
specification for the automatic transmission control position in the
final rule is identical to that proposed in the NPRM. No commenter
objected to the automatic transmission control position proposed in the
NPRM.
In its petition for reconsideration, the Alliance stated:
* * * several vehicle manufacturers have issues with limiting the
orientation of the control position (PRND). With the introduction of
shift-by-wire technology, some vehicle manufacturers have already
introduced this technology and identified a separate lever of the
steering column dedicated to the automatic transmission control
position (PRND) with the following orientations:
R R P-R
P-N N-P N
D D D
The Alliance asked if any of the PRND orientations described above
would not be permitted in the new FMVSS No. 101 final rule, and how
automatic transmissions without a park position are to be
identified.\5\ The Alliance also petitioned that Table 1 be amended to
list only ``P'', ``R'' and ``N'', since NHTSA already allows
manufacturers to substitute a letter or graphic of their choice for
``D''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Alliance appears to be asking for an interpretation of
transmission shift positions, regulated in FMVSS No. 102,
Transmission shift position sequence, starter interlock, and
transmission braking effect. We note that in an August 1, 2002
interpretation letter to Lemf[ouml]rder Corporation, NHTSA addressed
shift positions that include a ``park'' position, specifically
addressing S3.1.1 that states: ``if the transmission shift lever
sequence includes a park position, it shall be located at the end,
adjacent to the reverse drive position.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response to the Alliance's petition, NHTSA will amend the
footnote accompanying the automatic transmission control position item
\6\ in Table 1 to:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Which will be designated as footnote 13.
The letters ``P'', ``R'', ``N'', and ``D'' are considered
separate identifiers for the gear positions, park, reverse, neutral
and drive, respectively. The locations of these gear positions,
within the vehicle and with respect to each other, are governed by
FMVSS No. 102. The letter ``D'' may be replaced by another
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
alphanumeric character or symbol chosen by the manufacturer.
NHTSA will not change the ``PRND'' abbreviation in column 3 because
it is highly recognized by drivers.\7\ Changing it to ``PRN'' may
mislead some to believe it refers to an item other that the automatic
transmission control position.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See ``Comprehension Testing for In-vehicle Symbols'';
Campbell et al, Battelle Human Factors Transportation Center for The
Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers; September 7, 2005.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Low Tire Pressure (including malfunction) (see FMVSS 138), Low Tire
Pressure (including malfunction) that identifies involved tire (See
FMVSS 138) and Tire Pressure Monitoring System Malfunction (See FMVSS
138)--The Alliance recommended that the parenthetical phrase
``(including malfunction)'' for two of the items be removed from Column
1, and referred to in a footnote, as part of recommended changes to
footnote 13.\8\ The Alliance noted that ``Tire Pressure Monitoring
System Malfunction (See FMVSS 138)'' refers to footnote 14.\9\ The
Alliance
[[Page 27969]]
stated its belief that the reference to ``(see FMVSS 138)'' was
sufficient and suggested combining footnotes 13 and 14 into one
footnote that would read:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ In Table 1 published on August 17, 2005, footnote 13 stated:
``Required only for FMVSS compliant vehicles.''
\9\ In Table 1 published on August 17, 2005, footnote 14 stated:
``Alternatively, either low tire pressure telltale may be used to
indicate a TPMS malfunction. See FMVSS 138.''
Required only for FMVSS 138 compliant vehicles. Alternatively,
either low tire pressure telltale may be used to indicate a TPMS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
malfunction.
NHTSA has decided not to make changes to ``Low Tire Pressure
(including malfunction) (See FMVSS 138),'' to ``Low Tire Pressure
(including malfunction) that identifies involved tire (See FMVSS 138)''
or to ``Tire Pressure Monitoring System Malfunction (See FMVSS 138)''
items. There are three items related to tire pressure monitoring in the
August 17, 2005 final rule because differing phase-in dates for FMVSS
No. 138, Tire pressure monitoring systems (TPMS) may make
simultaneously available, both vehicles with TPMS that meet FMVSS No.
138 and vehicles with TMPS that are not required to meet FMVSS No. 138.
Depending on the FMVSS No. 138 compliance status of the vehicle, the
tire pressure monitoring item from Table 1 used in the vehicle will
differ.
Footnote 11--In Table 1 in the August 17, 2005 final rule, Footnote
11 accompanied the Speedometer item. Footnote 11 stated: ``If the
speedometer is graduated in miles per hour and in kilometers per hour,
the identification must be ``MPH and km/h'' in any combination of upper
and lowercase letters.'' The Alliance recommended that ``MPH and km/h''
be amended to read `` `MPH' and `km/h'.''
NHTSA agrees with the Alliance's recommendation. In the final rule,
in Table 1, the footnote, which is now designated as footnote 12,
reads: ``If the speedometer is graduated in both miles per hour and
kilometers per hour, the scales must be identified ``MPH'' and ``km/
h'', respectively, in any combination of upper and lower case
letters.''
G. Table 2
The Alliance also petitioned for changes to the following two items
in Table 2:
Odometer--For the odometer item, the Alliance petitioned to add a
footnote stating that the letters may be any combination of upper and
lower case. NHTSA concurs. Therefore, in this final rule, the odometer
item in Table 2 will include a footnote 2 that reads: ``Any combination
of upper- or lowercase letters may be used.''
Headlamps and Taillamps Control--In the August 17, 2005 final rule,
the headlamps and taillamps control, in Table 2, included footnote 3
which reads: ``If a line appears in Column 2 and Column 3, the Control,
Telltale or Indicator is required to be identified, however the form of
the identification is the manufacturer's option'' and footnote 4 which
reads: ``Separate identification not required if function is combined
with Master Lighting Switch.'' The Alliance suggested that if footnotes
3 and 4 are moved to Column 1, footnote 3 can be simplified. The
Alliance apparently believes the ``first sentence'' is not necessary.
NHTSA has decided not to adopt the Alliance's suggested changes. We
are not removing footnotes 3 and 4 for the headlamps and taillamps
control item, since the footnotes refer to the words or abbreviations
needed to identify the item.
III. Leadtime
In the final rule; delay of effective date document of January 24,
2006, NHTSA delayed the effective date of the FMVSS No. 101 final rule
to September 1, 2006. Subsequently, in a document dated March 10, 2006,
the AIAM petitioned for reconsideration of the January 24, 2006 final
rule, primarily asking that NHTSA address the issues in the petitions
for reconsideration by the AIAM and other petitioners by September 1,
2006 and publish ``as soon as possible prior to September 1 a notice
establishing a more appropriate effective date, consistent with the
pending petitions.''
In this document, we address AIAM's concerns. This final rule;
response to petitions for reconsideration is published well in advance
of September 1, 2006. In addition, as earlier explained, so that this
final rule can be implemented at minimal cost, we are providing a
little more than five years' leadtime to implement S5.4.3, ``Each
symbol used for the identification of a telltale, control or indicator
must be in a color that stands out clearly against the background.''
Today's final rule amends the FMVSS No. 101 final rule published on
August 17, 2005 and becomes effective September 1, 2006, for vehicles
under 10,000 pounds. The compliance date for S5.4.3 is September 1,
2011.
IV. Statutory Bases for the Rulemaking
We have issued this final rule pursuant to our statutory authority.
Under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301, Motor Vehicle Safety (49 U.S.C. 30101 et
seq.), the Secretary of Transportation is responsible for prescribing
motor vehicle safety standards that are practicable, meet the need for
motor vehicle safety, and are stated in objective terms. 49 U.S.C.
30111(a). When prescribing such standards, the Secretary must consider
all relevant, available motor vehicle safety information. 49 U.S.C.
30111(b). The Secretary must also consider whether a proposed standard
is reasonable, practicable, and appropriate for the type of motor
vehicle or motor vehicle equipment for which it is prescribed and the
extent to which the standard will further the statutory purpose of
reducing traffic accidents and deaths and injuries resulting from
traffic accidents. Id. Responsibility for promulgation of Federal motor
vehicle safety standards was subsequently delegated to NHTSA. 49 U.S.C.
105 and 322; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
As a Federal agency, before promulgating changes to a Federal motor
vehicle safety standard, NHTSA also has a statutory responsibility to
follow the informal rulemaking procedures mandated in the
Administrative Procedure Act at 5 U.S.C. 553. Among these requirements
are Federal Register publication of a general notice of proposed
rulemaking, and giving interested persons an opportunity to participate
in the rulemaking through submission of written data, views or
arguments. After consideration of the public comments, we must
incorporate into the rules adopted, a concise general statement of the
rule's basis and purpose.
The agency has carefully considered these statutory requirements in
promulgating this final rule to amend FMVSS No. 101. As previously
discussed in detail, we have solicited public comment in an NPRM and
have carefully considered the public comments before issuing this final
rule. As a result, we believe that this final rule reflects
consideration of all relevant available motor vehicle safety
information. Consideration of all these statutory factors has resulted
in the following decisions in this final rule. In this final rule,
NHTSA permits use of a symbol suggested by the TMA in lieu of the words
``Trailer ABS'' or ``Trailer Antilock'' in identifying the ``Antilock
brake system trailer fault for vehicles subject to FMVSS 121''
telltale, does not require manufacturers to provide a means to shut off
various sources of interior illumination based on light emitting
diodes, and agrees to changes to Tables 1 and 2 suggested by the
Alliance. This final rule requires symbols to be ``substantially
similar in form to the symbol as it appears in
[[Page 27970]]
Table 1 or Table 2'' and for the horn symbol to have a color contrast
with its background. So that the color contrast requirement can be
implemented at minimal cost to industry, for vehicles with a GVWR under
10,000 pounds, this final rule delays from September 1, 2006 to
September 1, 2011, the effective date for the FMVSS No 101 final rule
published on August 17, 2005. For vehicles under 10,000 pounds, the
changes made in today's final rule will also take effect on September
1, 2011. Also, because the safety benefits of this final rule are very
small, there will be no measurable effect on safety as a result of the
delay in effective date.
As indicated, we have thoroughly reviewed the public comments and
adopted a final rule in light of comments. In the instances where we
did not adopt a comment, we explain why we did not adopt the comment.
V. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), provides for making determinations whether a
regulatory action is ``significant'' and therefore subject to Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) review and to the requirements of the
Executive Order. The Order defines a ``significant regulatory action''
as one that is likely to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations or recipients
thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
the Executive Order.
We have considered the impact of this rulemaking action under
Executive Order 12866 and the Department of Transportation's regulatory
policies and procedures. This rulemaking document was not reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget under E.O. 12866, ``Regulatory
Planning and Review.'' The rulemaking action is also not considered to
be significant under the Department's Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979).
For the following reasons, NHTSA concludes that this final rule
will not have any quantifiable cost effect on motor vehicle
manufacturers. In this final rule, NHTSA permits the use of a symbol
suggested by the TMA in lieu of the words ``Trailer ABS'' or ``Trailer
Antilock'' in identifying the ``Antilock brake system trailer fault for
vehicles subject to FMVSS 121'' telltale, does not require
manufacturers to provide a means to shut off various sources of
interior illumination based on light emitting diodes, and agrees to
changes to Tables 1 and 2 suggested by the Alliance. This final rule
requires symbols to be ``substantially similar in form to the symbol as
it appears in Table 1 and Table 2'' and for the horn symbol to have a
color contrast with its background. So that the color contrast
requirement can be implemented at minimal cost to industry, for
vehicles with a GVWR under 10,000 pounds, this final rule delays from
September 1, 2006 to September 1, 2011, the compliance date for S5.4.3
``Each symbol used for the identification of a telltale, control or
indicator must be in a color that stands out clearly against the
background.'' There will be no measurable effect on safety as a result
of this delay in compliance date for S5.4.3.
Because the economic effects of this final rule are so minimal, no
further regulatory evaluation is necessary.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.,
as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
(SBREFA) of 1996), whenever an agency is required to publish a notice
of rulemaking for any proposed or final rule, it must prepare and make
available for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that
describes the effect of the rule on small entities (i.e., small
businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions).
The Small Business Administration's regulations at 13 CFR part 121
define a small business, in part, as a business entity ``which operates
primarily within the United States.'' (13 CFR 121.105(a)). No
regulatory flexibility analysis is required if the head of an agency
certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The SBREFA amended the
Regulatory Flexibility Act to require Federal agencies to provide a
statement of the factual basis for certifying that a rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
I have considered the effects of this rulemaking action under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) and certify that this
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The statement of the factual basis for the
certification is that for vehicles under 10,000 pounds GVWR, this final
rule delays until September 1, 2011, the compliance date of a provision
in the final rule published on August 17, 2005, that requires symbols
used in identification of telltales, controls or indicators to be in a
color that ``stands out clearly against the background.'' As earlier
stated, small business manufacturers will incur costs that are so
minimal as to be unquantifiable as a result of this final rule.
For these reasons, and for the reasons described in our discussion
on Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures,
NHTSA concludes that this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
C. National Environmental Policy Act
NHTSA has analyzed this rulemaking action for the purposes of the
National Environmental Policy Act. The agency has determined that
implementation of this action will not have any significant impact on
the quality of the human environment.
D. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
NHTSA has analyzed this rule in accordance with the principles and
criteria set forth in Executive Order 13132, Federalism and has
determined that it does not have sufficient Federalism implications to
warrant consultation with State and local officials or the preparation
of a Federalism summary impact statement. The rule will not have any
substantial impact on the States, or on the current Federal-State
relationship, or on the current distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various local officials.
E. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
Pursuant to Executive Order 12988 ``Civil Justice Reform,'' we have
considered whether this final rule would have any retroactive effect.
NHTSA concludes that this final rule will not have any retroactive
effect. Under 49 U.S.C. 30103, whenever a Federal motor vehicle safety
standard is in effect, a State may not adopt or maintain a safety
standard applicable to
[[Page 27971]]
the same aspect of performance which is not identical to the Federal
standard, except to the extent that the state requirement imposes a
higher level of performance and applies only to vehicles procured for
the State's use. 49 U.S.C. 30161 sets forth a procedure for judicial
review of final rules establishing, amending, or revoking Federal motor
vehicle safety standards. That section does not require submission of a
petition for reconsideration or other administrative proceedings before
parties may file suit in court.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, a person is not required
to respond to a collection of information by a Federal agency unless
the collection displays a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
control number. This final rule does not require any collections of
information, or recordkeeping or retention requirements as defined by
the OMB in 5 CFR part 1320.
G. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272)
directs NHTSA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless doing so would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling
procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by
voluntary consensus standards bodies, such as the Society of Automotive
Engineers (SAE). The NTTAA directs the agency to provide Congress,
through the OMB, explanations when we decide not to use available and
applicable voluntary consensus standards.
After conducting a search of available sources, we have determined
that there is no applicable voluntary consensus standard for this final
rule.
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires Federal agencies to prepare a written assessment of the costs,
benefits, and other effects of proposed or final rules that include a
Federal mandate likely to result in the expenditure by State, local or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of more
than $100 million in any one year (adjusted for inflation with base
year of 1995). Before promulgating a rule for which a written statement
is needed, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires NHTSA to identify
and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt
the least costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule. The provisions of section 205
do not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable law. Moreover,
section 205 allows NHTSA to adopt an alternative other than the least
costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative if the
agency publishes with the final rule an explanation why that
alternative was not adopted.
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of more
than $100 million annually. Accordingly, this rule is not subject to
the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
I. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
The Department of Transportation assigns a regulation identifier
number (RIN) to each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of
Federal Regulations. The Regulatory Information Service Center
publishes the Unified Agenda in April and October of each year. You may
use the RIN contained in the heading at the beginning of this document
to find this action in the Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 571
Imports, Motor vehicle safety, Motor vehicles, Rubber and rubber
products, and Tires.
0
In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA amends 49 CFR part 571 as
follows:
PART 571--FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARDS
0
1. The authority citation for part 571 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, 30115, 30166, and 30177;
delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
0
2. In Sec. 571.101, the second sentence of S5.2.1, paragraph (b) and
the introductory text of paragraph (d) of S5.3.2.2, S5.3.4, S5.5.2, and
Tables 1 and 2 are revised, and a new sentence is added to the end of
S5.4.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 571.101 Standard No. 101, Controls, telltales, and indicators.
* * * * *
S5.2.1 * * * If a symbol is used, each symbol provided pursuant to
this paragraph must be substantially similar in form to the symbol as
it appears in Table 1 or Table 2. * * *
S5.3.2.2 * * *
* * * * *
(b) At a level of brightness other than the highest level, the
identification of controls and indicators must be barely discernible to
the driver who has adapted to dark ambient roadway condition;
* * * * *
(d) May have levels of brightness, other than the two required
visible levels of brightness, at which those items and identification
are not visible.
* * * * *
S5.3.4 Brightness of interior lamps. (a) Any source of illumination
within the passenger compartment which is forward of a transverse
vertical plane 110 mm rearward of the manikin ``H'' point with the
driver's seat in its rearmost driving position, which is not used for
the controls and displays regulated by this standard, which is not a
telltale, and which is capable of being illuminated while the vehicle
is in motion, shall have either:
(1) Light intensity which is manually or automatically adjustable
to provide at least two levels of brightness;
(2) A single intensity that is barely discernible to a driver who
has adapted to dark ambient roadway conditions;or
(3) A means of being turned off.
(b) Paragraph (a) of S5.3.4 does not apply to buses that are
normally operated with the passenger compartment illuminated.
* * * * *
S5.4.3 * * * For vehicles with a GVWR of under 4,536 kg (10,000
pounds), the compliance date for this provision is September 1, 2011.
* * * * *
S5.5.2 The telltales for any brake system malfunction required by
Table 1 to be red, air bag malfunction, low tire pressure, passenger
air bag off, high beam, turn signal, and seat belt must not be shown in
the same common space.
* * * * *
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
[[Page 27972]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR15MY06.031
[[Page 27973]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR15MY06.032
[[Page 27974]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR15MY06.033
[[Page 27975]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR15MY06.034
[[Page 27976]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR15MY06.035
Issued on: May 9, 2006.
Jacqueline Glassman,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 06-4478 Filed 5-12-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-C