McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services; A Subsidiary of McLeodUSA, Inc.; Springfield, MO; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration, 27518 [06-4416]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
27518
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 91 / Thursday, May 11, 2006 / Notices
relief from and impose civil penalties
against the Defendants for violating the
Clean Water Act by discharging
pollutants without a permit into waters
of the United States. The propsoed
Consent Decree resolves these
allegations by requiring the Defendants
to restore the impacted areas and
perform mitigation and to pay a civil
penalty.
The Department of Justice will accept
written comments relating to this
proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30)
days from the date of publication of this
Notice. Please address comments to
Edmund F. Brennan, Assistant United
States Attorney, and refer to United
States of America v. County of
Sacramento, Case Number 2:06–CV–
00908–GEB–GGH.
The proposed Consent Decree may be
examined at the Clerk’s Office, United
States District Court for the Eastern
District of California, 501 I Street,
Sacramento, California. In addition, the
proposed Consent Decree may be
viewed at https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
open.html.
Edmund F. Brennan,
Assistant U.S. Attorney.
[FR Doc. 06–4376 Filed 5–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Notice of Lodging of Consent
Judgment Pursuant to Federal Water
Pollution Control Act
Notice is hereby given that on April
28, 2006, a proposed Consent Judgment
in United States and State of New York
v. County of Suffolk, et al., Civil Action
No. CV–06–1978, was lodged with the
United States District Court for the
Eastern District of New York.
The United States and the State of
New York sued the County of Suffolk,
Suffolk County Department of Public
Works, and Charles J. Bartha,
Commissioner of the Suffolk County
Department of Public Works
(collectively, ‘‘Suffolk’’) under seciton
309(b) and (d) of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 1319(b)
and (d), and under State law for alleged
violations of Suffolk’s Industrial Waste
Pretreatment Program (IPP) and its State
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(SPDES) Permits. The Consent Judgment
resolves these claims and requires
Suffolk to pay a civil penalty of
$300,000, to fund a supplemental
environmental project in the amount of
$700,000, and to comply with its IPP
and SPDES Permits.
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of thirty (30) days from the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:29 May 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
date of this publication comments
relating to the proposed Consent
Judgment. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General of the Environment and Natural
Resources Division, U.S. Department of
Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and
should refer to United States, et al v.
County of Suffolk., et al., DJ No. 90–5–
1–1–5065/1.
The proposed Consent Judgment may
be examined at the Office of the United
States Attorney, Eastern District of New
York, One Pierrepont Plaza, 14th Fl.,
Brooklyn, New York 11201, and at the
United States Environmental Protection
Agency, Region II, 290 Broadway, New
York, New York 10007–1866. During the
public comment period, the proposed
Consent Judgment may also be
examined on the following Department
of Justice Web site, https://
www.usdoj.gov./enrd/open.html. A copy
of the proposed Consent Judgment may
be obtained by mail from the Consent
Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a
request to Tonia Fleetwood
(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no.
(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514–1547. If requesting a
copy of the proposed Consent Judgment,
please so note and enclose a check in
the amount of $17.00 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the U.S.
Treasury.
Ronald Gluck,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 06–4373 Filed 5–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–M
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,063]
McLeodUSA Telecommunications
Services; A Subsidiary of McLeodUSA,
Inc.; Springfield, MO; Dismissal of
Application for Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
McLeodUSA Telecommunications
Services, a subsidiary of McLeodUSA,
Inc., Springfield, Missouri. The
application did not contain new
information supporting a conclusion
that the determination was erroneous,
and also did not provide a justification
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for reconsideration of the determination
that was based on either mistaken facts
or a misinterpretation of facts or of the
law. Therefore, dismissal of the
application was issued.
TA–W–59,063; McLeodUSA
Telecommunications Service, A
Subsidiary of McLeodUSA, Inc.,
Springfield, Missouri. (May 3,
2006).
Signed at Washington, DC this 4th day of
May 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 06–4416 Filed 5–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19
U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
periods of April 2006.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
directly-impacted (primary) worker
adjustment assistance to be issued, each
of the group eligibility requirements of
section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 27518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-4416]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-59,063]
McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services; A Subsidiary of McLeodUSA,
Inc.; Springfield, MO; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at McLeodUSA Telecommunications
Services, a subsidiary of McLeodUSA, Inc., Springfield, Missouri. The
application did not contain new information supporting a conclusion
that the determination was erroneous, and also did not provide a
justification for reconsideration of the determination that was based
on either mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of facts or of the law.
Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.
TA-W-59,063; McLeodUSA Telecommunications Service, A Subsidiary of
McLeodUSA, Inc., Springfield, Missouri. (May 3, 2006).
Signed at Washington, DC this 4th day of May 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 06-4416 Filed 5-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
