Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers from the People's Republic of China and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 27227-27228 [E6-7131]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 10, 2006 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–822, A–583–820]
Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers
from the People’s Republic of China
and Taiwan: Final Results of the
Expedited Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On January 3, 2006, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) initiated sunset reviews of
the antidumping duty orders on certain
helical spring lock washers from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) and
Taiwan, pursuant to section 751(c) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’). On the basis of the notice of
intent to participate and adequate
substantive responses filed on behalf of
the domestic interested parties, and
inadequate responses from respondent
interested parties, the Department
conducted expedited sunset reviews. As
a result of these sunset reviews, the
Department finds that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders would likely
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping at the levels listed below in
the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of
Reviews.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 10, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
Nunno, AD/CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On January 3, 2006, the Department
initiated sunset reviews of the
antidumping duty orders on certain
helical spring lock washers (‘‘HSLWs’’)
from the PRC and Taiwan pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Act. See Initiation
of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 70 FR
91 (January 3, 2006). The Department
received notices of intent to participate
from a domestic interested party,
Shakeproof Assembly Components
Division of Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(‘‘Shakeproof’’), within the deadline
specified in section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of
the Department’s regulations.
Shakeproof claimed interested party
status pursuant to section 771(9)(C) of
the Act as a U.S. producer of the
domestic like product. We received a
submission from the domestic interested
party within the 30-day deadline
specified in section 351.218(d)(3)(i) of
the Department’s regulations. However,
we did not receive submissions from
any respondent interested parties. As a
result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B)
of the Act and section
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of the
Department’s regulations, the
Department conducted expedited sunset
reviews of these orders.
Scope of the Orders
The products covered by both
antidumping duty orders are HSLWs of
carbon steel, of carbon alloy steel, or of
stainless steel, heat–treated or non–heattreated, plated or non–plated, with ends
that are off–line. HSLWs are designed
to: (1) Function as a spring to
compensate for developed looseness
between the component parts of a
fastened assembly; (2) distribute the
load over a larger area for screws or
bolts; and (3) provide a hardened
bearing surface. The scope does not
include internal or external tooth
washers, nor does it include spring lock
washers made of other metals, such as
copper.
HSLWs subject to the order are
currently classifiable under subheading
7318.21.0030 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheading is
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of this proceeding is dispositive.
On September 30, 1997, the
Department determined that HSLWs
which are imported into the United
States in an uncut, coil form are within
the scope of the orders. See Notice of
Scope Rulings, 62 FR 62288 (November
21, 1997).
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these cases are
addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum’’ from Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, to David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, dated May 3, 2006
(‘‘Decision Memorandum’’), which is
hereby adopted by this notice. The
issues discussed in the Decision
Memorandum include the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and the magnitude of the margin likely
to prevail if the orders were revoked.
Parties can find a complete discussion
of all issues raised in these sunset
reviews and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
memorandum, which is on file in room
B–099 of the main Department of
Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on our Web site at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/. The paper copy and
electronic version of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Reviews
We determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on HSLWs
from the PRC and Taiwan would likely
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping at the following weighted–
average percentage margins:
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers
Weighted–Average Margin (Percent)
PRC.
Zhejiang Wanxin Group Co., Ltd.a/k/a Hangzhou Spring Washer Plant (‘‘HSWP’’) ......................................
HSWP via IFI Morgan Limited .........................................................................................................................
HSWP via Carway Development Ltd. .............................................................................................................
HSWP via Midway Fasteners Ltd. ...................................................................................................................
HSWP via Linkwell Industry Co., Ltd. .............................................................................................................
HSWP via Fastwell Industry Co., Ltd. .............................................................................................................
HSWP via Sunfast International Corp. ............................................................................................................
HSWP via Winner Standard Parts Co., Ltd. ...................................................................................................
PRC–wide Rate ...............................................................................................................................................
Taiwan.
Spring Lake Enterprises Co., Ltd. ...................................................................................................................
Ceimiko Industrial Co., Ltd. .............................................................................................................................
Par Excellence Industrial Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................
All Others Rate ................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:59 May 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
27227
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
69.88
69.88
69.88
69.88
69.88
69.88
69.88
69.88
128.63
31.93
31.93
31.93
31.93
10MYN1
27228
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 10, 2006 / Notices
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders
(‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with section 351.305
of the Department’s regulations. Timely
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: May 3, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–7131 Filed 5–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Exporters’ Textile Advisory
Committee; Notice of Open Meeting
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
The Exporters’ Textile Advisory
Committee (ETAC) will meet on May 24,
2006. The meeting will be held at 10:00
a.m at the U.S. Department of
Commerce, Main Commerce Building,
Room 6029, 1401 Constitution Avenue,
NW, Washington, DC.
This document amends the one
published on March 28, 2006 (71 FR
15384) to include the room number,
which was not available at the time of
publication. All other information
remains the same.
The Committee provides information
on overseas requirements and
regulations, works with U.S. companies
to eliminate trade barriers, and
promotes U.S. textile and apparel
products overseas.
Tentative Agenda: Review of export
data, report on conditions in the export
market; update on FTA’s; export
expansion activities; U.S. Customs and
Border Protection’s ‘‘Customs-Trade
Partnership Against Terrorism’’
Initiative, and other business.
The meeting will be open to the
public with a limited number of seats
available. For further information call
Rachel Anne Alarid at (202) 482-5154.
Dated: May 4, 2006.
James C. Leonard III,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Textiles and
Apparel.
[FR Doc. E6–7133 Filed 5–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:59 May 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
North American Free-Trade
Agreement, Article 1904; NAFTA Panel
Reviews; Request for Panel Review
NAFTA Secretariat, United
States Section, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of First Request for Panel
Review.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On May 1, 2006, Corn
Products International, Inc. And Casco,
Inc./Canada Starch Operating Company,
Inc; filed a First Request for Panel
Review with the Canadian Section of
the NAFTA Secretariat pursuant to
Article 1904 of the North American Free
Trade Agreement. Panel review was
requested of the final dumping and
countervailing duty determinations
made by the Canada Border Services
Agency, respecting Unprocessed Grain
Corn, excluding Seed Corn (for
Reproductive Purposes), Sweet Corn,
and Popping Corn, Originating in or
Exported from the United States of
America. Second and third requests
were received on May 1, 2006 from
Maple Leaf Foods Inc. and its Affiliates;
and Commercial Alcohols Inc. This
determination was published in the
Canada Gazette, Part I, (Vol. 140, No.
13, pp. 673) on April 1, 2006. The
NAFTA Secretariat has assigned Case
Number CDA–USA–2006–1904–01 to
this request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Caratina L. Alston, United States
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite
2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter
19 of the North American Free-Trade
Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) establishes a
mechanism to replace domestic judicial
review of final determinations in
antidumping and countervailing duty
cases involving imports from a NAFTA
country with review by independent
binational panels. When a Request for
Panel Review is filed, a panel is
established to act in place of national
courts to review expeditiously the final
determination to determine whether it
conforms with the antidumping or
countervailing duty law of the country
that made the determination.
Under Article 1904 of the Agreement,
which came into force on January 1,
1994, the Government of the United
States, the Government of Canada and
the Government of Mexico established
Rules of Procedure for Article 1904
Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
These Rules were published in the
Federal Register on February 23, 1994
(59 FR 8686).
A first Request for Panel Review was
filed with the Canadian Section of the
NAFTA Secretariat, pursuant to Article
1904 of the Agreement, on May 1, 2006,
requesting panel review of the final
determination described above.
The Rules provide that:
(a) A Party or interested person may
challenge the final determination in
whole or in part by filing a Complaint
in accordance with Rule 39 within 30
days after the filing of the first Request
for Panel Review (the deadline for filing
a Complaint is May 31, 2006);
(b) A Party, investigating authority or
interested person that does not file a
Complaint but that intends to appear in
support of any reviewable portion of the
final determination may participate in
the panel review by filing a Notice of
Appearance in accordance with Rule 40
within 45 days after the filing of the first
Request for Panel Review (the deadline
for filing a Notice of Appearance is June
15, 2006); and
(c) The panel review shall be limited
to the allegations of error of fact or law,
including the jurisdiction of the
investigating authority, that are set out
in the Complaints filed in the panel
review and the procedural and
substantive defenses raised in the panel
review.
Dated: May 4, 2006.
Caratina L. Alston,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. E6–7110 Filed 5–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 050306C]
New England Fishery Management
Council; Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The New England Fishery
Management Council (Council) is
scheduling a public meetings of its
Scientific and Statistical (SSC)
Committee in June, 2006 to consider
actions affecting New England fisheries
in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ).
Recommendations from this group will
be brought to the full Council for formal
consideration and action, if appropriate.
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27227-27228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7131]
[[Page 27227]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-822, A-583-820]
Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers from the People's Republic of
China and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On January 3, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') initiated sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders
on certain helical spring lock washers from the People's Republic of
China (``PRC'') and Taiwan, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). On the basis of the notice of
intent to participate and adequate substantive responses filed on
behalf of the domestic interested parties, and inadequate responses
from respondent interested parties, the Department conducted expedited
sunset reviews. As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department
finds that revocation of the antidumping duty orders would likely lead
to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels listed below in
the section entitled ``Final Results of Reviews.''
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 10, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Nunno, AD/CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC,
20230; telephone: (202) 482-0783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 3, 2006, the Department initiated sunset reviews of the
antidumping duty orders on certain helical spring lock washers
(``HSLWs'') from the PRC and Taiwan pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Act. See Initiation of Five-year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 70 FR 91
(January 3, 2006). The Department received notices of intent to
participate from a domestic interested party, Shakeproof Assembly
Components Division of Illinois Tool Works Inc. (``Shakeproof''),
within the deadline specified in section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of the
Department's regulations. Shakeproof claimed interested party status
pursuant to section 771(9)(C) of the Act as a U.S. producer of the
domestic like product. We received a submission from the domestic
interested party within the 30-day deadline specified in section
351.218(d)(3)(i) of the Department's regulations. However, we did not
receive submissions from any respondent interested parties. As a
result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and section
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of the Department's regulations, the Department
conducted expedited sunset reviews of these orders.
Scope of the Orders
The products covered by both antidumping duty orders are HSLWs of
carbon steel, of carbon alloy steel, or of stainless steel, heat-
treated or non-heat-treated, plated or non-plated, with ends that are
off-line. HSLWs are designed to: (1) Function as a spring to compensate
for developed looseness between the component parts of a fastened
assembly; (2) distribute the load over a larger area for screws or
bolts; and (3) provide a hardened bearing surface. The scope does not
include internal or external tooth washers, nor does it include spring
lock washers made of other metals, such as copper.
HSLWs subject to the order are currently classifiable under
subheading 7318.21.0030 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope
of this proceeding is dispositive.
On September 30, 1997, the Department determined that HSLWs which
are imported into the United States in an uncut, coil form are within
the scope of the orders. See Notice of Scope Rulings, 62 FR 62288
(November 21, 1997).
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these cases are addressed in the ``Issues and
Decision Memorandum'' from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, to David M. Spooner, Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, dated May 3, 2006 (``Decision
Memorandum''), which is hereby adopted by this notice. The issues
discussed in the Decision Memorandum include the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margin
likely to prevail if the orders were revoked. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised in these sunset reviews and
the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is
on file in room B-099 of the main Department of Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be
accessed directly on our Web site at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/. The paper
copy and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of Reviews
We determine that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on
HSLWs from the PRC and Taiwan would likely lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping at the following weighted-average percentage
margins:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers Weighted-Average Margin (Percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRC.................................
Zhejiang Wanxin Group Co., Ltd.a/k/a 69.88
Hangzhou Spring Washer Plant
(``HSWP'').........................
HSWP via IFI Morgan Limited......... 69.88
HSWP via Carway Development Ltd..... 69.88
HSWP via Midway Fasteners Ltd....... 69.88
HSWP via Linkwell Industry Co., Ltd. 69.88
HSWP via Fastwell Industry Co., Ltd. 69.88
HSWP via Sunfast International Corp. 69.88
HSWP via Winner Standard Parts Co., 69.88
Ltd................................
PRC-wide Rate....................... 128.63
Taiwan..............................
Spring Lake Enterprises Co., Ltd.... 31.93
Ceimiko Industrial Co., Ltd......... 31.93
Par Excellence Industrial Co., Ltd.. 31.93
All Others Rate..................... 31.93
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 27228]]
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with section 351.305 of the
Department's regulations. Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms
of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: May 3, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-7131 Filed 5-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S