Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 27290-27292 [E6-7123]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
27290
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 10, 2006 / Notices
alternative trade adjustment assistance under
section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of
April 2006.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–7122 Filed 5–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of
April, 2006
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–7127 Filed 5–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,445]
Christiana Floral, Inc., Christiana, PA;
Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
Christiana Floral, Inc., Christiana,
Pennsylvania. The application did not
contain new information supporting a
conclusion that the determination was
erroneous, and also did not provide a
justification for reconsideration of the
determination that was based on either
mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal
of the application was issued.
TA–W–58,445; Christiana Floral, Inc.,
Christiana, Pennsylvania, (April 26,
2006)
Signed at Washington, DC, this 1st day of
May, 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–7117 Filed 5–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,215 and TA–W–59,215A]
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Convergys Corporation, Tampa, FL
and Hillsboro, OR; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on April 14,
2006 in response to a petition filed by
a company official on behalf of workers
at Convergys Corporation, Tampa,
Florida (TA–W–59,215), and Convergys
Corporation, Hillsboro, Oregon (TA–W–
59,215A).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:59 May 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19
U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
periods of April 2006.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
directly-impacted (primary) worker
adjustment assistance to be issued, each
of the group eligibility requirements of
section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign county of
articles like or directly competitive with
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance as an
adversely affected secondary group to be
issued, each of the group eligibility
requirements of section 222(b) of the
Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied for
the firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued; the date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of (a)(2)(A)
(increased imports) of section 222 have
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 10, 2006 / Notices
been met, and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of
the Trade Act have been met.
TA–W–58,802; F. Schumacher and
Company, Richburg Distribution
Facility, Richburg, SC: February 8,
2005.
TA–W–58,802A; F. Schumacher and
Company, New York, NY: February
8, 2005.
TA–W–58,888; General Motors, Lansing
Metal Center, Lansing, MI: February
6, 2005.
TA–W–59,136; Cranston Print Works
Company, Design and Engraving
Division, Cranston, RI: March 6,
2005.
TA–W–59,147; Springs Global US, Inc.,
Piedmont Plants Division,
Piedmont, AL: April 3, 2005.
TA–W–59,166; Guidecraft, Inc., Kaplan
Manufacturing Division, Winthrop,
MN: April 5, 2005.
TA–W–59,173; Russell Corporation,
Spalding/Huffy Sports, Site
Staffing, Sussex, WI: April 6, 2005.
TA–W–59,181; Syngenta, Inc., Chop
Protection Cold Creek Site Div.,
Bucks, AL: April 10, 2005.
TA–W–59,184; John F. Turner and
Company, Modesto, CA: April 7,
2005.
TA–W–59,192; Sauer-Danfoss, Propel
Div., LaSalle, IL: April 11, 2005.
TA–W–58,397; J.S. McCarthy Co.,
Augusta, ME: November 15, 2004.
TA–W–58,996; EneFco USA, Inc.,
Restricted to Workers Producing
Felt Glides, Auburn, ME: March 1,
2005.
TA–W–59,011; Race Quip, Inc.,
Columbus, OH: March 13, 2005.
TA–W–59,062; Machined Products Co.,
Lancaster, PA: March 12, 2005.
TA–W–59,017; Ford Motor Co., Atlanta
Assembly Plant, Hapeville, GA:
March 13, 2005.
TA–W–59,069; Renee’s Manufacturing,
Inc., San Francisco, CA: March 21,
2005.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of (a)(2)(B)
(shift in production) of section 222 and
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–58,894A; Russell Corporation,
Atlanta, GA: February 22, 2005.
TA–W–58,894B; Cross Creek Apparel,
Mt. Airy, NC: February 22, 2005.
TA–W–58,930; CTB McGraw Hill, LLC,
On-Site Lease Workers of Kelly
Services, Inc., Monterey, CA:
February 27, 2005.
TA–W–59,072; Point Technologies, Div.
of American Medical Instruments,
Leased Workers of Corestaff, etc.,
Boulder, CO: March 21, 2005.
TA–W–59,098; York, A Johnson Controls
Co., Building Efficiency Div., On-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:59 May 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
Site Leased Workers of Manpower
and JFC Staffing, York, PA: October
31, 2005.
TA–W–59,105; Solo Cup Company, St.
Albans, VT: March 28, 2005.
TA–W–59,142; Tenneco, Inc., ClevitePullman Division, Milan, OH:
March 20, 2005.
TA–W–59,171; Starkey Labs, Microtech
& Qualitone, Eden Praire, MN: April
6, 2005.
TA–W–59,191; ADC, On-Site Leased
Workers from Aerotek and Adecco,
Shakopee, MN: April 11, 2005.
TA–W–59,193; Creative Engineered
Polymer Products, LLC, A
Subsidiary of Reserve Group, West
Alexandria, OH: April 11, 2005.
TA–W–58,809; Henry Pratt Company,
Machine Shop and Weld/Paint
Shop, Dixon, IL: January 26, 2005.
TA–W–58,954; Kidde Residential and
Commercial, Div. of Walter Kidde
Portable Equipment, Colorado
Springs, CO: March 1, 2005.
The following certification has been
issued. The requirement of supplier to
a trade certified firm and section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
None.
The following certification has been
issued. The requirement of downstream
producer to a trade certified firm and
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the criteria
for eligibility have not been met for the
reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that
criterion (a)(2)(A)(I.A) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A)
(no employment decline) has not been
met.
None.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (shift in production to
a foreign country) have not been met.
TA–W–59,033; BroadBus Technology,
Boxborough, MA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–58,878; Creative Label, Inc.,
Martin, TN.
TA–W–58,879; Martin Engraving
Corporation, Martin, TN.
TA–W–58,894C; Moving Comfort,
Chantilly, VA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (Increased imports
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27291
and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (has shifted
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–58,940; National Envelope, Earth
City, MO.
TA–W–59,047; Blumenthal Mills,
Marion, SC.
TA–W–59,073; Kordsa, Inc., On-Site
Leased Workers of Young Blood,
Whiteville, NC.
TA–W–59,119; Naston, Inc., Norcross,
GA.
The workers firm does not produce an
article as required for certification under
section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA–W–58,986; Ross Acquisition, Inc.,
dba Galerie Au Chocolat, Wellston,
OH.
TA–W–59,051; EIC Corporation, Santa
Clara, CA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (2) has not been met. The
workers firm (or subdivision) is not a
supplier or downstream producer to
trade-affected companies.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for
Alternative Trade Ajdustment
Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
The following certifications have been
issued; the date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determinations.
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
section 246(a)(3)(ii) have been met.
I. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
II. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
III. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
27292
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 10, 2006 / Notices
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
section 246(a)(3)(ii) have not been met
for the reasons specified.
Since the workers are denied
eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers
cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
TA–W–59,033; BroadBus Technology,
Boxborough, MA.
TA–W–58,878; Creative Label, Inc.,
Martin, TN.
TA–W–58,879; Martin Engraving
Corporation, Martin, TN.
TA–W–58,894C; Moving Comfort,
Chantilly, VA.
TA–W–58,940; National Envelope, Earth
City, MO.
TA–W–59,047; Blumenthal Mills,
Marion, SC.
TA–W–59,073; Kordsa, Inc., On-Site
Leased Workers of Young Blood,
Whiteville, NC.
TA–W–59,119; Naston, Inc., Norcross,
GA.
TA–W–58,986; Ross Acquisition, Inc.,
dba Galerie Au Chocolat, Wellston,
OH.
TA–W–59,051; EIC Corporation, Santa
Clara, CA.
The Department as determined that
criterion (1) of section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of
age or older.
None.
The Department as determined that
criterion (2) of section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
TA–W–59,184; John F. Turner and
Company, Modesto, CA.
TA–W–58,397; J.S. McCarthy Co.,
Augusta, ME.
TA–W–58,894A; Russell Corporation,
Atlanta, GA.
TA–W–59,142; Tenneco, Inc., ClevitePullman Division, Milan, OH.
TA–W–59,171; Starkey Labs, Microtech
& Qualitone, Eden Praire, MN.
The Department as determined that
criterion (3) of section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None.
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the month of April 2006.
Copies of These determinations are
available for inspection in Room C–
5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210 during normal business hours
or will be mailed to persons who write
to the above address.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,259]
[TA–W–58,624]
Fairchild Semiconductor International
Mountain Top, PA; Dismissal of
Application for Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
Fairchild Semiconductor International,
Mountain Top, Pennsylvania. The
application did not contain new
information supporting a conclusion
that the determination was erroneous,
and also did not provide a justification
for reconsideration of the determination
that was based on either mistaken facts
or a misinterpretation of facts or of the
law. Therefore, dismissal of the
application was issued.
TA–W–58,624; Fairchild Semiconductor
International Mountain Top,
Pennsylvania, (April 26, 2006).
Signed at Washington, DC, this 1st day of
May 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–7121 Filed 5–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,229]
Master Products, Wabash, IN; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on April 18,
2006 in response to a worker petition
filed by a California one stop operator
on behalf of workers at Master Products,
Wabash, Indiana.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Dated: May 1, 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–7123 Filed 5–9–06; 8:45 am]
Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of
April 2006.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–7128 Filed 5–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:59 May 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Nautilus, Inc., Tyler, TX; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, an investigation was
initiated on April 21, 2006 in response
to a petition filed by the Workforce
Center Coordinator on behalf of workers
at Nautilus, Inc., Tyler, Texas.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed in Washington, DC this 26th day of
April 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–7129 Filed 5–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Investigations Regarding Certifications
of Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under section 221(a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, has
instituted investigations pursuant to
section 221(a) of the Act.
The purpose of each of the
investigations is to determine whether
the workers are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Title II,
Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations
will further relate, as appropriate, to the
determination of the date on which total
or partial separations began or
threatened to begin and the subdivision
of the firm involved.
The petitioners or any other persons
showing a substantial interest in the
subject matter of the investigations may
request a public hearing, provided such
request is filed in writing with the
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than May 22, 2006.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments regarding the
subject matter of the investigations to
the Director, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, at the address
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27290-27292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7123]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents
summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade
adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the periods
of April 2006.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for directly-impacted (primary)
worker adjustment assistance to be issued, each of the group
eligibility requirements of section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign county of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance
as an adversely affected secondary group to be issued, each of the
group eligibility requirements of section 222(b) of the Act must be
met.
(1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers'
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued; the date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of section 222 have
[[Page 27291]]
been met, and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-58,802; F. Schumacher and Company, Richburg Distribution Facility,
Richburg, SC: February 8, 2005.
TA-W-58,802A; F. Schumacher and Company, New York, NY: February 8,
2005.
TA-W-58,888; General Motors, Lansing Metal Center, Lansing, MI:
February 6, 2005.
TA-W-59,136; Cranston Print Works Company, Design and Engraving
Division, Cranston, RI: March 6, 2005.
TA-W-59,147; Springs Global US, Inc., Piedmont Plants Division,
Piedmont, AL: April 3, 2005.
TA-W-59,166; Guidecraft, Inc., Kaplan Manufacturing Division, Winthrop,
MN: April 5, 2005.
TA-W-59,173; Russell Corporation, Spalding/Huffy Sports, Site Staffing,
Sussex, WI: April 6, 2005.
TA-W-59,181; Syngenta, Inc., Chop Protection Cold Creek Site Div.,
Bucks, AL: April 10, 2005.
TA-W-59,184; John F. Turner and Company, Modesto, CA: April 7, 2005.
TA-W-59,192; Sauer-Danfoss, Propel Div., LaSalle, IL: April 11, 2005.
TA-W-58,397; J.S. McCarthy Co., Augusta, ME: November 15, 2004.
TA-W-58,996; EneFco USA, Inc., Restricted to Workers Producing Felt
Glides, Auburn, ME: March 1, 2005.
TA-W-59,011; Race Quip, Inc., Columbus, OH: March 13, 2005.
TA-W-59,062; Machined Products Co., Lancaster, PA: March 12, 2005.
TA-W-59,017; Ford Motor Co., Atlanta Assembly Plant, Hapeville, GA:
March 13, 2005.
TA-W-59,069; Renee's Manufacturing, Inc., San Francisco, CA: March 21,
2005.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of section 222 and section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-58,894A; Russell Corporation, Atlanta, GA: February 22, 2005.
TA-W-58,894B; Cross Creek Apparel, Mt. Airy, NC: February 22, 2005.
TA-W-58,930; CTB McGraw Hill, LLC, On-Site Lease Workers of Kelly
Services, Inc., Monterey, CA: February 27, 2005.
TA-W-59,072; Point Technologies, Div. of American Medical Instruments,
Leased Workers of Corestaff, etc., Boulder, CO: March 21, 2005.
TA-W-59,098; York, A Johnson Controls Co., Building Efficiency Div.,
On-Site Leased Workers of Manpower and JFC Staffing, York, PA: October
31, 2005.
TA-W-59,105; Solo Cup Company, St. Albans, VT: March 28, 2005.
TA-W-59,142; Tenneco, Inc., Clevite-Pullman Division, Milan, OH: March
20, 2005.
TA-W-59,171; Starkey Labs, Microtech & Qualitone, Eden Praire, MN:
April 6, 2005.
TA-W-59,191; ADC, On-Site Leased Workers from Aerotek and Adecco,
Shakopee, MN: April 11, 2005.
TA-W-59,193; Creative Engineered Polymer Products, LLC, A Subsidiary of
Reserve Group, West Alexandria, OH: April 11, 2005.
TA-W-58,809; Henry Pratt Company, Machine Shop and Weld/Paint Shop,
Dixon, IL: January 26, 2005.
TA-W-58,954; Kidde Residential and Commercial, Div. of Walter Kidde
Portable Equipment, Colorado Springs, CO: March 1, 2005.
The following certification has been issued. The requirement of
supplier to a trade certified firm and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the
Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certification has been issued. The requirement of
downstream producer to a trade certified firm and section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
criteria for eligibility have not been met for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2)(A)(I.A) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A) (no employment decline) has not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have not been met.
TA-W-59,033; BroadBus Technology, Boxborough, MA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
TA-W-58,878; Creative Label, Inc., Martin, TN.
TA-W-58,879; Martin Engraving Corporation, Martin, TN.
TA-W-58,894C; Moving Comfort, Chantilly, VA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (Increased
imports and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (has shifted production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
TA-W-58,940; National Envelope, Earth City, MO.
TA-W-59,047; Blumenthal Mills, Marion, SC.
TA-W-59,073; Kordsa, Inc., On-Site Leased Workers of Young Blood,
Whiteville, NC.
TA-W-59,119; Naston, Inc., Norcross, GA.
The workers firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA-W-58,986; Ross Acquisition, Inc., dba Galerie Au Chocolat, Wellston,
OH.
TA-W-59,051; EIC Corporation, Santa Clara, CA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (2) has not been met. The
workers firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier or downstream producer
to trade-affected companies.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Alternative Trade Ajdustment Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements
of section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
The following certifications have been issued; the date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determinations.
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of section 246(a)(3)(ii) have been met.
I. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
II. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that
are not easily transferable.
III. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements
of section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of
[[Page 27292]]
section 246(a)(3)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified.
Since the workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
TA-W-59,033; BroadBus Technology, Boxborough, MA.
TA-W-58,878; Creative Label, Inc., Martin, TN.
TA-W-58,879; Martin Engraving Corporation, Martin, TN.
TA-W-58,894C; Moving Comfort, Chantilly, VA.
TA-W-58,940; National Envelope, Earth City, MO.
TA-W-59,047; Blumenthal Mills, Marion, SC.
TA-W-59,073; Kordsa, Inc., On-Site Leased Workers of Young Blood,
Whiteville, NC.
TA-W-59,119; Naston, Inc., Norcross, GA.
TA-W-58,986; Ross Acquisition, Inc., dba Galerie Au Chocolat, Wellston,
OH.
TA-W-59,051; EIC Corporation, Santa Clara, CA.
The Department as determined that criterion (1) of section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older.
None.
The Department as determined that criterion (2) of section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily
transferable.
TA-W-59,184; John F. Turner and Company, Modesto, CA.
TA-W-58,397; J.S. McCarthy Co., Augusta, ME.
TA-W-58,894A; Russell Corporation, Atlanta, GA.
TA-W-59,142; Tenneco, Inc., Clevite-Pullman Division, Milan, OH.
TA-W-59,171; Starkey Labs, Microtech & Qualitone, Eden Praire, MN.
The Department as determined that criterion (3) of section 246 has
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are
not adverse.
None.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the month of April 2006. Copies of These determinations are
available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business
hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address.
Dated: May 1, 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6-7123 Filed 5-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
