Wells Fargo Funds Trust, et al.; Notice of Application, 26790-26794 [E6-6913]
Download as PDF
26790
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 88 / Monday, May 8, 2006 / Notices
2005, each applicant made a liquidating
distribution to its shareholders, based
on net asset value. Expenses of $13,000
incurred in connection with each
liquidation will be paid by each
applicant out of cash assets retained for
that purpose.
Filing Date: The applications were
filed on November 18, 2005.
Applicants’ Address: IR Pass-Through
Corp., c/o Winthrop Management LLC,
7 Bullfinch Pl., Suite 500, PO Box 9507,
Boston, MA 02114.
BidFund 2 Percent [File No. 811–21204]
Summary: Applicant, a closed-end
investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an
investment company. Applicant has
never made a public offering of its
securities and does not propose to make
a public offering or engage in business
of any kind.
Filing Date: The application was filed
on April 4, 2006.
Applicant’s Address: c/o Financial
Foundry, LLC, 301 North Harrison St.,
Suite 185, Princeton, NJ 08540.
NorCap Funds, Inc. [File No. 811–
21345]
Summary: Applicant seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an
investment company. On April 3, 2006,
applicant made a liquidating
distribution to its shareholders, based
on net asset value. Applicant’s
investment adviser, Northern Capital
Management, LLC, paid all expenses
incurred in connection with the
liquidation.
Filing Date: The application was filed
on April 3, 2006.
Applicant’s Address: 8010 Excelsior
Dr., Suite 300, Madison, WI 53717.
Access Variable Insurance Trust [File
No. 811–21312]
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Summary: Applicant seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an
investment company. On July 29, 2005,
applicant made a liquidating
distribution to its shareholders based on
net asset value. Applicant incurred no
expenses in connection with the
liquidation.
Filing Dates: The application was
filed on December 15, 2005 and
amended and restated on March 1, 2006.
Applicant’s Address: 28050 U.S. Hwy.
19 N, Suite 301, Clearwater, FL 33761.
Mercury V.I. Funds, Inc. [File No. 811–
9159]
Summary: Mercury V.I. Funds, Inc.
(‘‘Applicant’’) seeks an order declaring
that it has ceased to be an investment
company. The Applicant was merged
into the Merrill Lynch Large Cap
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:05 May 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
Growth V.I. Fund, a series of Merrill
Lynch Variable Series Funds, Inc.,
pursuant to an agreement and plan of
reorganization filed with the
Commission on October 15, 2003. The
Applicant incurred expenses of
$68,674.96 (approximately) in
connection with the merger.
Filing Dates: The application was
filed on November 30, 2005, and
amended on January 25, 2006.
Applicant’s Address: Mercury V.I.
Funds, Inc. c/o Merrill Lynch
Investment Managers, 800 Scudders
Mill Road, Plainsboro, NJ 08536.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
27309; 812–12974]
Wells Fargo Funds Trust, et al.; Notice
of Application
May 1, 2006.
Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of application under
section 6(c) of the Investment Company
Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’) for an exemption
from sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act,
under section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act for
an exemption from section 12(d)(1) of
Allmerica Investment Trust [File No.
the Act, under sections 6(c) and 17(b) of
811–4138]
the Act for an exemption from sections
Summary: Allmerica Investment Trust 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(3) of the Act, and
under section 17(d) of the Act and rule
(‘‘Applicant’’) seeks an order declaring
17d-1 under the Act to permit certain
that it has ceased to be an investment
joint arrangements.
company. The Applicant was merged
into the Goldman Sachs Variable
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants
Insurance Trust, pursuant to an
request an order that would permit
agreement and plan of reorganization
certain registered open-end management
filed with the Commission on October
investment companies to participate in
31, 2005. Expenses in connection with
the merger were shared equally between a joint lending and borrowing facility
the merged fund and the surviving fund. (‘‘Credit Facility’’).
APPLICANTS: Wells Fargo Funds Trust
Filing Dates: The application was
(‘‘Funds Trust’’), Wells Fargo Variable
filed on February 14, 2006, and
Trust (‘‘Variable Trust’’), and Wells
amended on April 7, 2006.
Fargo Master Trust (‘‘Master Trust’’)
Applicant’s Address: Allmerica
(collectively, the ‘‘Trusts’’) and Wells
Investment Trust, 440 Lincoln Street,
Fargo Funds Management, LLC (‘‘Funds
Worcester, MA 01653.
Management’’).
FILING DATES: The application was filed
Mercury Variable Trust [File No. 811–
on May 14, 2003 and amended on
8163]
April 27, 2006.
Summary: Mercury Variable Trust.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An
(‘‘Applicant’’) seeks an order declaring
order granting the application will be
that it has ceased to be an investment
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
company. The Applicant was merged
a hearing by writing to the
into the Merrill Lynch International
Commission’s Secretary and serving
Value V.I. Fund, a series of Merrill
applicants with a copy of the request,
Lynch Variable Series Funds, Inc.,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
pursuant to an agreement and plan of
should be received by the Commission
reorganization filed with the
by 5:30 p.m. on May 26, 2006, and
Commission on October 15, 2003. The
should be accompanied by proof of
Applicant incurred expenses of
service on applicants, in the form of an
$195,735.59 (approximately) in
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of
connection with the merger.
service. Hearing requests should state
Filing Dates: The application was
the nature of the writer’s interest, the
filed on November 30, 2005, and
reason for the request, and the issues
amended on January 25, 2006.
contested. Persons who wish to be
Applicant’s Address: Mercury
notified of a hearing may request
Variable Trust c/o Merrill Lynch
notification by writing to the
Investment Managers, 800 Scudders
Commission’s Secretary.
Mill Road, Plainsboro, NJ 08536.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities
For the Commission, by the Division of
and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Investment Management, pursuant to
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–
delegated authority.
1090. Applicants, 525 Market Street,
Nancy M. Morris,
12th Floor, San Francisco, California
94105.
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–6912 Filed 5–5–06; 8:45 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaea
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
F. Hahn, Senior Counsel, at (202) 551–
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
08MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 88 / Monday, May 8, 2006 / Notices
6870, or Nadya B. Roytblat, Assistant
Director, at (202) 551–6821 (Division of
Investment Management, Office of
Investment Company Regulation).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained for a fee at the
Commission’s Public Reference Branch,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–0102 (tel. 202–551–5850).
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Applicants’ Representations
1. Each Trust is registered under the
Act as an open-end management
investment company and is organized as
a Delaware business trust.1
Responsibility for the overall
management of the Trusts rests with
each Trust’s respective board of trustees
(each, a ‘‘Board’’). Funds Management is
registered under the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940. Funds
Management serves as investment
adviser to the Funds. An existing
Commission order permits certain
Funds that are not money market Funds
to invest uninvested cash balances in
one or more money market Funds that
comply with rule 2a-7 under the Act
(‘‘Money Market Funds’’).2
2. Some Funds may lend money to
banks or other entities by entering into
repurchase agreements or other shortterm instruments. Other Funds may
borrow money from the same or similar
banks or other entities for temporary
purposes to satisfy redemption requests,
to cover unanticipated cash shortfalls
such as a trade ‘‘fail’’ in which cash
payment for a security sold by a Fund
has been delayed, or for other temporary
purposes. Currently, the Funds have an
overdraft provision with their custodian
bank and committed lines of credit.
3. If the Funds were to borrow money
from their custodian bank or through
their lines of credit, the Funds would
pay interest on the borrowed cash at a
1 Applicants request that the relief apply to (i) the
Trusts and their existing and future series
(‘‘Funds’’), (ii) Funds Management and any
successor entity to Funds Management, and (iii) any
other registered open-end management investment
company or its series advised by Funds
Management or a person controlling, controlled by,
or under common control (within the meaning of
section 2(a)(9) of the Act) with Funds Management
(included in the term ‘‘Funds’’). The term
‘‘successor’’ is limited to entities that result from a
reorganization into another jurisdiction or a change
in the type of business organization. All existing
investment companies that currently intend to rely
on the requested relief are named as applicants.
Any other existing or future Funds that
subsequently rely on the requested order will
comply with the terms and conditions in the
application.
2 In the Matter of Stagecoach Funds, Inc., et al.,
Investment Company Act Release Nos. 23237
(June 2, 1998) (notice) and 23294 (June 30, 1998)
(order).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:05 May 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
rate that would be higher than the rate
that would be earned by other (nonborrowing) Funds on investments in
repurchase agreements and other shortterm instruments of the same maturity
as the bank loan. Applicants state that
this differential represents the profit the
banks would earn for serving as a
middleman between a borrower and a
lender. In addition, while bank
borrowings generally could supply
needed cash to cover unanticipated
redemptions and sales fails, the
borrowing Funds would incur fees,
interest and/or other charges involved
in obtaining a bank loan.
4. Applicants request an order that
would permit the Funds to enter into
master interfund lending agreements
(‘‘Interfund Lending Agreements’’) that
would permit each Fund to lend money
directly to and borrow directly from
other Funds (‘‘Interfund Loan’’).
Applicants believe that the Credit
Facility would reduce the Funds’
potential borrowing costs and enhance
their ability to earn higher rates of
interest on short-term lendings.
Although the Credit Facility would
reduce the Funds’ need to borrow from
banks, the Funds would be free to
establish and/or continue committed
lines of credit or other borrowing
arrangements with banks.
5. Applicants anticipate that the
Credit Facility would provide a
borrowing Fund with cost savings when
the cash position of the Fund is
insufficient to meet temporary cash
requirements. This situation could arise
when redemptions exceed anticipated
volumes and the Funds have
insufficient cash on hand to satisfy such
redemptions. When the Funds liquidate
portfolio securities to meet redemption
requests, which normally are paid
immediately, they often do not receive
payment in settlement for up to three
days (or longer for certain foreign
transactions). The Credit Facility would
provide a source of immediate, shortterm liquidity pending settlement of the
sale of portfolio securities.
6. Applicants also propose using the
Credit Facility when a sale of securities
fails due to circumstances beyond a
Fund’s control, such as a delay in the
delivery of cash to the Fund’s custodian
or improper delivery instructions by the
broker effecting the transaction. Sales
fails may present a cash shortfall if the
Fund has undertaken to purchase a
security with the proceeds from
securities sold. When the Fund
experiences a cash shortfall due to a
sales fail, the custodian typically
extends temporary credit to cover the
shortfall and the Fund incurs overdraft
charges. Alternatively, the Fund could
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26791
fail on its intended purchase due to lack
of funds from the previous sale,
resulting in additional costs to the
Fund, or sell a security on a same day
settlement basis, earning a lower return
on the investment. Use of the Credit
Facility under these circumstances
would enable the Fund to have access
to immediate short-term liquidity
without incurring custodian overdraft or
other charges.
7. While bank borrowings could
generally supply needed cash to cover
unanticipated redemptions and sales
fails, under the Credit Facility a
borrowing Fund would pay lower
interest rates than those offered by
banks on short-term loans. In addition,
Funds making short-term cash loans
directly to other Funds would earn
interest at a rate higher than they
otherwise could obtain from investing
their cash balances in repurchase
agreements or in short-term
investments. Thus, applicants believe
that the Credit Facility would benefit
both borrowing and lending Funds.
8. The interest rate charged to the
Funds on any Interfund Loan (the
‘‘Interfund Loan Rate’’) would be the
average of the ‘‘Repo Rate’’ and the
‘‘Bank Loan Rate,’’ both as defined
below. The Repo Rate on any day would
be the highest rate available to the
Funds from investments in overnight
repurchase agreements. The Bank Loan
Rate for any day would be calculated by
the Interfund Lending Committee, as
defined below, on each day an Interfund
Loan is made according to a formula
approved by the Boards intended to
approximate the lowest interest rate at
which bank short-term loans would be
available to the Funds. The formula
would be based upon a publicly
available rate (e.g., Federal funds plus
25 basis points) and would vary with
this rate so as to reflect changing bank
loan rates. Each Board periodically
would review the continuing
appropriateness of using the publicly
available rate used to determine the
Bank Loan Rate, as well as the
relationship between the Bank Loan
Rate and current bank loan rates that
would be available to the Funds. The
initial formula and any subsequent
modifications to the formula would be
subject to the approval of each Board.
9. The Credit Facility would be
administered by investment
professionals and administrative
personnel from Funds Management (the
‘‘Interfund Lending Committee’’). No
portfolio manager of any Fund will
serve as a member of the Interfund
Lending Committee. Under the Credit
Facility, the portfolio managers for each
participating Fund could provide
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
08MYN1
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
26792
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 88 / Monday, May 8, 2006 / Notices
standing instructions to participate
daily as a borrower or lender. On each
business day, the Interfund Lending
Committee would collect data on the
uninvested cash and borrowing
requirements of all participating Funds
from the Funds’ custodian(s). The
Money Market Funds would not
participate as borrowers. Once it has
determined the aggregate amount of
cash available for loans and borrowing
demand, the Interfund Lending
Committee would allocate loans among
borrowing Funds without any further
communication from portfolio
managers. Applicants expect far more
available uninvested cash each day than
borrowing demand. After allocating
cash for Interfund Loans, the Interfund
Lending Committee will invest any
remaining cash in accordance with the
standing instructions of portfolio
managers or return remaining amounts
for investment directly by the portfolio
manager of the applicable Fund.
10. The Interfund Lending Committee
would allocate borrowing demand and
cash available for lending among the
Funds on what the Interfund Lending
Committee believes to be an equitable
basis, subject to certain administrative
procedures applicable to all Funds, such
as the time of filing requests to
participate, minimum loan sizes, and
the need to minimize the number of
transactions and associated
administrative costs. To reduce
transaction costs, each Interfund Loan
normally would be allocated in a
manner intended to minimize the
number of participants necessary to
complete the loan transaction.
11. The Interfund Lending Committee
would (a) monitor the interest rates
charged and the other terms and
conditions of the loans, (b) limit the
borrowings and loans entered into by
each Fund to ensure that they comply
with the Fund’s investment policies and
limitations, (c) ensure equitable
treatment of each Fund, and (d) make
quarterly reports to each Board
concerning any transactions by the
Funds under the Credit Facility and the
interest rates charged. The method of
allocation and related administrative
procedures would be approved by each
Board, including a majority of trustees
who are not ‘‘interested persons’’ of the
Fund, as defined in section 2(a)(19) of
the Act (‘‘Independent Trustees’’), to
ensure that both borrowing and lending
Funds participate on an equitable basis.
12. Funds Management, through the
Interfund Lending Committee, would
administer the Credit Facility as part of
its duties under its advisory contract
and administrative contract with each
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:05 May 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
Fund and would receive no
compensation for its services.
13. No Fund may participate in the
Credit Facility unless (a) the Fund has
obtained shareholder approval for its
participation, if such approval is
required by law, (b) the Fund has fully
disclosed all material information
concerning the Credit Facility in its
prospectus and/or statement of
additional information (‘‘SAI’’), and (c)
the Fund’s participation in the Credit
Facility is consistent with its
organizational documents and its
investment policies and limitations.
14. In connection with the Credit
Facility, applicants request an order
under (a) section 6(c) of the Act granting
relief from sections 18(f) and 21(b) of
the Act; (b) section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act
granting relief from section 12(d)(1) of
the Act; (c) sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the
Act granting relief from sections 17(a)(1)
and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and (d) section
17(d) of the Act and rule 17d–1 under
the Act to permit certain joint
arrangements.
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
1. Section 17(a)(3) of the Act generally
prohibits any affiliated person, or
affiliated person of an affiliated person,
from borrowing money or other property
from a registered investment company.
Section 21(b) generally prohibits any
registered management company from
lending money or other property to any
person if that person controls or is
under common control with the
company. Section 2(a)(3)(C) of the Act
defines an ‘‘affiliated person’’ of another
person, in part, to be any person directly
or indirectly controlling, controlled by,
or under common control with, the
other person. Applicants state that the
Funds may be under common control by
virtue of having Funds Management as
their common investment adviser,
and\or by reason of having common
officers and/or trustees.
2. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that
an exemptive order may be granted
where an exemption is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest and
consistent with the protection of
investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of
the Act. Section 17(b) authorizes the
Commission to exempt a proposed
transaction from section 17(a) provided
that the terms of the transaction,
including the consideration to be paid
or received, are fair and reasonable and
do not involve overreaching on the part
of any person concerned, and the
transaction is consistent with the policy
of the investment company as recited in
its registration statement and with the
general purposes of the Act. Applicants
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
believe that the proposed arrangements
satisfy these standards for the reasons
discussed below.
3. Applicants submit that sections
17(a)(3) and 21(b) of the Act were
intended to prevent a person with
strong potential adverse interests to and
some influence over the investment
decisions of a registered investment
company from causing or inducing the
investment company to engage in
lending transactions that unfairly inure
to the benefit of that person and that are
detrimental to the best interests of the
investment company and its
shareholders. Applicants assert that the
Credit Facility transactions do not raise
these concerns because (a) Funds
Management, through the Interfund
Lending Committee, would administer
the program as a disinterested fiduciary;
(b) all Interfund Loans would consist
only of uninvested cash reserves that a
Fund otherwise would invest in shortterm repurchase agreements or other
short-term instruments; (c) the Interfund
Loans would not involve a greater risk
than such other investments; (d) the
lending Fund would receive interest at
a rate higher than it could obtain
through such other investments; and (e)
the borrowing Fund would pay interest
at a rate lower than otherwise available
to it under its bank loan agreements and
avoid the up-front commitment fees
associated with committed lines of
credit. Moreover, applicants believe that
the other conditions in the application
would effectively preclude the
possibility of any Fund obtaining an
undue advantage over any other Fund.
4. Section 17(a)(1) of the Act generally
prohibits an affiliated person of a
registered investment company, or an
affiliated person of an affiliated person,
from selling any securities or other
property to the company. Section
12(d)(1) of the Act generally makes it
unlawful for a registered investment
company to purchase or otherwise
acquire any security issued by any other
investment company except in
accordance with the limitations set forth
in that section. Applicants state that the
obligation of a borrowing Fund to repay
an Interfund Loan may constitute a
security under sections 17(a)(1) and
12(d)(1) of the Act. Section 12(d)(1)(J) of
the Act provides that the Commission
may exempt persons or transactions
from any provision of section 12(d)(1) if
and to the extent such exemption is
consistent with the public interest and
the protection of investors. Applicants
contend that the standards under
sections 6(c), 17(b), and 12(d)(1) of the
Act are satisfied for all the reasons set
forth above in support of their request
for relief from sections 17(a)(3) and
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
08MYN1
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 88 / Monday, May 8, 2006 / Notices
21(b) of the Act and for the reasons
discussed below.
5. Applicants state that section
12(d)(1) of the Act was intended to
prevent the pyramiding of investment
companies in order to avoid duplicative
costs and fees attendant upon multiple
layers of investments. Applicants
submit that the Credit Facility does not
involve those abuses. Applicants note
that there would be no duplicative costs
or fees to the Funds or to Fund
shareholders, and that Funds
Management would receive no
additional compensation for its services
in administering the Credit Facility.
Applicants also note that the purpose of
the Credit Facility is to provide
economic benefits for all the
participating Funds.
6. Section 18(f)(1) of the Act prohibits
open-end investment companies from
issuing any senior security except that
a company is permitted to borrow from
any bank, if immediately after the
borrowing, there is an asset coverage of
at least 300% for all borrowings of the
company. Under section 18(g) of the
Act, the term ‘‘senior security’’ includes
any bond, debenture, note, or similar
obligation or instrument constituting a
security and evidencing indebtedness.
Applicants request exemptive relief
from section 18(f)(1) to the limited
extent necessary to implement the
Credit Facility (because the lending
Funds are not banks).
7. Applicants believe that granting
relief under section 6(c) of the Act is
appropriate because the Funds would
remain subject to the requirement of
section 18(f)(1) of the Act that all
borrowings of a Fund, including
combined interfund and bank
borrowings, have at least 300% asset
coverage. Based on the conditions and
safeguards described in the application,
applicants also submit that to allow the
Funds to borrow from other Funds
pursuant to the Credit Facility is
consistent with the purposes and
policies of section 18(f)(1) of the Act.
8. Section 17(d) of the Act and rule
17d–1 under the Act generally prohibit
any affiliated person of a registered
investment company, or affiliated
person of an affiliated person, when
acting as principal, from effecting any
joint transaction in which the company
participates unless the transaction is
approved by the Commission. Rule 17d–
1 provides that in passing upon
applications filed under the rule, the
Commission will consider whether the
participation of a registered investment
company in a joint enterprise on the
basis proposed is consistent with the
provisions, policies, and purposes of the
Act and the extent to which the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:05 May 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
company’s participation is on a basis
different from or less advantageous than
that of other participants.
9. Applicants submit that the purpose
of section 17(d) is to avoid overreaching
by and unfair advantage to investment
company insiders. Applicants believe
that the Credit Facility is consistent
with the provisions, policies and
purposes of the Act in that it offers both
reduced borrowing costs and enhanced
returns on loaned funds to all
participating Funds and their
shareholders. Applicants note that each
Fund would have an equal opportunity
to borrow and lend on equal terms
consistent with its investment policies
and fundamental investment
limitations. Applicants therefore believe
that each Fund’s participation in the
Credit Facility would be on terms no
different from or less advantageous than
that of other participating Funds.
Applicants’ Conditions
Applicants agree that any order
granting the requested relief will be
subject to the following conditions:
1. The Interfund Loan Rate to be
charged to the Funds under the Credit
Facility will be the average of the Repo
Rate and the Bank Loan Rate.
2. On each business day, the Interfund
Lending Committee will compare the
Bank Loan Rate with the Repo Rate and
will make cash available for Interfund
Loans only if the Interfund Loan Rate is
(a) more favorable to the lending Fund
than the Repo Rate and (b) more
favorable to the borrowing Fund than
the Bank Loan Rate.
3. If a Fund has outstanding
borrowings, any Interfund Loans to the
Fund (a) will be at an interest rate equal
to or lower than any outstanding bank
loan, (b) will be secured at least on an
equal priority basis with at least an
equivalent percentage of collateral to
loan value as any outstanding bank loan
that requires collateral, (c) will have a
maturity no longer than any outstanding
bank loan (and in any event not over
seven days), and (d) will provide that,
if an event of default occurs under any
agreement evidencing an outstanding
bank loan to the Fund, that event of
default will automatically (without need
for action or notice by the lending Fund)
constitute an immediate event of default
under the Interfund Lending Agreement
entitling the lending Fund to call the
Interfund Loan (and exercise all rights
with respect to any collateral) and that
such call will be made if the lending
bank exercises its right to call its loan
under its agreement with the borrowing
Fund.
4. A Fund may make an unsecured
borrowing through the Credit Facility if
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26793
its outstanding borrowings from all
sources immediately after the interfund
borrowing total 10% or less of its total
assets, provided that if the Fund has a
secured loan outstanding from any other
lender, including but not limited to
another Fund, the Fund’s interfund
borrowing will be secured on at least an
equal priority basis with at least an
equivalent percentage of collateral to
loan value as any outstanding loan that
requires collateral. If a Fund’s total
outstanding borrowings immediately
after an interfund borrowing would be
greater than 10% of its total assets, the
Fund may borrow through the Credit
Facility on a secured basis only. A Fund
may not borrow through the Credit
Facility or from any other source if its
total outstanding borrowings
immediately after the interfund
borrowing would be more than 331⁄3%
of its total assets.
5. Before any Fund that has
outstanding interfund borrowings may,
through additional borrowings, cause its
outstanding borrowings from all sources
to exceed 10% of its total assets, the
Fund must first secure each outstanding
Interfund Loan by the pledge of
segregated collateral with a market
value at least equal to 102% of the
outstanding principal value of the loan.
If the total outstanding borrowings of a
Fund with outstanding Interfund Loans
exceeds 10% of its total assets for any
other reason (such as a decline in net
asset value or because of shareholder
redemptions), the Fund will within one
business day thereafter (a) repay all its
outstanding Interfund Loans, (b) reduce
its outstanding indebtedness to 10% or
less of its total assets, or (c) secure each
outstanding Interfund Loan by the
pledge of segregated collateral with a
market value at least equal to 102% of
the outstanding principal value of the
loan until the Fund’s total outstanding
borrowings cease to exceed 10% of its
total assets, at which time the collateral
called for by this condition 5 shall no
longer be required. Until each Interfund
Loan that is outstanding at any time that
a Fund’s total outstanding borrowings
exceeds 10% is repaid or the Fund’s
total outstanding borrowings cease to
exceed 10% of its total assets, the Fund
will mark the value of the collateral to
market each day and will pledge such
additional collateral as is necessary to
maintain the market value of the
collateral that secures each outstanding
Interfund Loan at least equal to 102% of
the outstanding principal value of the
loan.
6. No Fund may lend to another Fund
through the Credit Facility if the loan
would cause its aggregate outstanding
loans through the Credit Facility to
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
08MYN1
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
26794
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 88 / Monday, May 8, 2006 / Notices
exceed 15% of its net assets at the time
of the loan.
7. A Fund’s Interfund Loans to any
one Fund shall not exceed 5% of the
lending Fund’s net assets.
8. The duration of Interfund Loans
will be limited to the time required to
receive payment for securities sold, but
in no event more than seven days. Loans
effected within seven days of each other
will be treated as separate loan
transactions for purposes of this
condition.
9. A Fund’s borrowings through the
Credit Facility, as measured on the day
when the most recent loan was made,
will not exceed the greater of 125% of
the Fund’s total net cash redemptions or
102% of sales fails for the preceding
seven calendar days.
10. Each Interfund Loan may be called
on one business day’s notice by a
lending Fund and may be repaid on any
day by a borrowing Fund.
11. A Fund’s participation in the
Credit Facility must be consistent with
its investment policies and limitations
and organizational documents.
12. The Interfund Lending Committee
will calculate total Fund borrowing and
lending demand through the Credit
Facility, and allocate loans on an
equitable basis among the Funds
without the intervention of any portfolio
manager of the Funds. The Interfund
Lending Committee will not solicit cash
for the Credit Facility from any Fund or
prospectively publish or disseminate
loan demand data to portfolio managers.
The Interfund Lending Committee will
invest any amounts remaining after
satisfaction of borrowing demand in
accordance with the standing
instructions from portfolio managers or
return remaining amounts to Funds for
investment directly by the Funds.
13. The Interfund Lending Committee
will monitor the interest rates charged
and the other terms and conditions of
the Interfund Loans and will make a
quarterly report to the Board of each
Fund concerning the participation of the
Fund in the Credit Facility and the
terms and other conditions of any
extensions of credit under the facility.
14. The Boards of the Funds,
including a majority of the Independent
Trustees: (a) will review no less
frequently than quarterly each Fund’s
participation in the Credit Facility
during the preceding quarter for
compliance with the conditions of any
order permitting such transactions; (b)
will establish the Bank Loan Rate
formula used to determine the interest
rate on Interfund Loans, approve any
modifications thereto, and review no
less frequently than annually the
continuing appropriateness of the Bank
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:05 May 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
Loan Rate formula; and (c) will review
no less frequently than annually the
continuing appropriateness of the
Fund’s participation in the Credit
Facility.
15. In the event an Interfund Loan is
not paid according to its terms and the
default is not cured within two business
days from its maturity or from the time
the lending Fund makes a demand for
payment under the provisions of the
Interfund Lending Agreement, the
Interfund Lending Committee will
promptly refer such loan for arbitration
to an independent arbitrator selected by
the Board of any Fund involved in the
loan who will serve as the arbitrator of
disputes concerning Interfund Loans.3
The arbitrator will resolve any problem
promptly, and the arbitrator’s decision
will be binding on both Funds. The
arbitrator will submit, at least annually,
a written report to the Board of each
Fund setting forth a description of the
nature of any dispute and the actions
taken by the Funds to resolve the
dispute.
16. Each Fund will maintain and
preserve for a period of not less than six
years from the end of the fiscal year in
which any transaction under the Credit
Facility occurred, the first two years in
an easily accessible place, written
records of all such transactions setting
forth a description of the terms of the
transaction, including the amount, the
maturity, and the rate of interest on the
loan, the rate of interest available at the
time on short-term repurchase
agreements and bank borrowings, and
such other information presented to the
Fund’s Board in connection with the
review required by conditions 13 and
14.
17. The Interfund Lending Committee
will prepare and submit to the Boards
for review an initial report describing
the operations of the Credit Facility and
the procedures to be implemented to
ensure that all Funds are treated fairly.
After the commencement of operation of
the Credit Facility, the Interfund
Lending Committee will report on the
operations of the Credit Facility at the
quarterly meetings of each Fund’s
Board. In addition, for two years
following the commencement of the
Credit Facility, the independent public
accountant for each Fund shall prepare
an annual report that evaluates the
Interfund Lending Committee’s
assertion that it has established
procedures reasonably designed to
achieve compliance with the conditions
3 If the dispute involves Funds with different
Boards, the respective Board of each Fund will
select an independent arbitrator that is satisfactory
to each of them.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the order. The report shall be
prepared in accordance with the
Statements on Standards for Attestation
Engagements No. 10 and it shall be filed
pursuant to Item 77Q3 of Form N–SAR,
as such Statements or Form may be
revised, amended, or superseded from
time to time. In particular, the report
shall address procedures designed to
achieve the following objectives: (a)
That the Interfund Loan Rate will be
higher than the Repo Rate, but lower
than the Bank Loan Rate; (b) compliance
with the collateral requirements as set
forth in the application; (c) compliance
with the percentage limitations on
interfund borrowing and lending; (d)
allocation of interfund borrowing and
lending demand in an equitable manner
and in accordance with procedures
established by each Board; and (e) that
the interest rate on any Interfund Loan
does not exceed the interest rate on any
outstanding third party borrowings of a
borrowing Fund at the time of the
Interfund Loan. After the final report is
filed, the independent public
accountant for the Fund in connection
with Fund audit examinations, will
continue to review the operation of the
Credit Facility for compliance with the
conditions of the application and their
review will form the basis, in part, of
the auditor’s report on internal
accounting controls in Form N–SAR.
18. No Fund will participate in the
Credit Facility unless it has fully
disclosed in its prospectus or SAI all
material facts about its intended
participation.
19. The Board of each Fund will
satisfy the fund governance standards as
defined in Rule 0–1(a)(7) under the Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–6913 Filed 5–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[File No. 500–1]
MCSi, Inc.; Order of Suspension of
Trading
May 4, 2006.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of MCSi, Inc.,
because it has not filed a periodic report
since the quarter ending September 30,
2002.
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
08MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26790-26794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-6913]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No. 27309; 812-12974]
Wells Fargo Funds Trust, et al.; Notice of Application
May 1, 2006.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.
ACTION: Notice of application under section 6(c) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') for an exemption from sections 18(f) and
21(b) of the Act, under section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act for an exemption
from section 12(d)(1) of the Act, under sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the
Act for an exemption from sections 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(3) of the Act,
and under section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act to
permit certain joint arrangements.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of Application: Applicants request an order that would permit
certain registered open-end management investment companies to
participate in a joint lending and borrowing facility (``Credit
Facility'').
Applicants: Wells Fargo Funds Trust (``Funds Trust''), Wells Fargo
Variable Trust (``Variable Trust''), and Wells Fargo Master Trust
(``Master Trust'') (collectively, the ``Trusts'') and Wells Fargo Funds
Management, LLC (``Funds Management'').
Filing Dates: The application was filed on May 14, 2003 and amended on
April 27, 2006.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the application
will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested
persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's Secretary
and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by
mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30
p.m. on May 26, 2006, and should be accompanied by proof of service on
applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate
of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the writer's
interest, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons
who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification by
writing to the Commission's Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Applicants, 525 Market Street,
12th Floor, San Francisco, California 94105.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaea F. Hahn, Senior Counsel, at (202)
551-
[[Page 26791]]
6870, or Nadya B. Roytblat, Assistant Director, at (202) 551-6821
(Division of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company
Regulation).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee at the
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549-0102 (tel. 202-551-5850).
Applicants' Representations
1. Each Trust is registered under the Act as an open-end management
investment company and is organized as a Delaware business trust.\1\
Responsibility for the overall management of the Trusts rests with each
Trust's respective board of trustees (each, a ``Board''). Funds
Management is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
Funds Management serves as investment adviser to the Funds. An existing
Commission order permits certain Funds that are not money market Funds
to invest uninvested cash balances in one or more money market Funds
that comply with rule 2a-7 under the Act (``Money Market Funds'').\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Applicants request that the relief apply to (i) the Trusts
and their existing and future series (``Funds''), (ii) Funds
Management and any successor entity to Funds Management, and (iii)
any other registered open-end management investment company or its
series advised by Funds Management or a person controlling,
controlled by, or under common control (within the meaning of
section 2(a)(9) of the Act) with Funds Management (included in the
term ``Funds''). The term ``successor'' is limited to entities that
result from a reorganization into another jurisdiction or a change
in the type of business organization. All existing investment
companies that currently intend to rely on the requested relief are
named as applicants. Any other existing or future Funds that
subsequently rely on the requested order will comply with the terms
and conditions in the application.
\2\ In the Matter of Stagecoach Funds, Inc., et al., Investment
Company Act Release Nos. 23237 (June 2, 1998) (notice) and 23294
(June 30, 1998) (order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Some Funds may lend money to banks or other entities by entering
into repurchase agreements or other short-term instruments. Other Funds
may borrow money from the same or similar banks or other entities for
temporary purposes to satisfy redemption requests, to cover
unanticipated cash shortfalls such as a trade ``fail'' in which cash
payment for a security sold by a Fund has been delayed, or for other
temporary purposes. Currently, the Funds have an overdraft provision
with their custodian bank and committed lines of credit.
3. If the Funds were to borrow money from their custodian bank or
through their lines of credit, the Funds would pay interest on the
borrowed cash at a rate that would be higher than the rate that would
be earned by other (non-borrowing) Funds on investments in repurchase
agreements and other short-term instruments of the same maturity as the
bank loan. Applicants state that this differential represents the
profit the banks would earn for serving as a middleman between a
borrower and a lender. In addition, while bank borrowings generally
could supply needed cash to cover unanticipated redemptions and sales
fails, the borrowing Funds would incur fees, interest and/or other
charges involved in obtaining a bank loan.
4. Applicants request an order that would permit the Funds to enter
into master interfund lending agreements (``Interfund Lending
Agreements'') that would permit each Fund to lend money directly to and
borrow directly from other Funds (``Interfund Loan''). Applicants
believe that the Credit Facility would reduce the Funds' potential
borrowing costs and enhance their ability to earn higher rates of
interest on short-term lendings. Although the Credit Facility would
reduce the Funds' need to borrow from banks, the Funds would be free to
establish and/or continue committed lines of credit or other borrowing
arrangements with banks.
5. Applicants anticipate that the Credit Facility would provide a
borrowing Fund with cost savings when the cash position of the Fund is
insufficient to meet temporary cash requirements. This situation could
arise when redemptions exceed anticipated volumes and the Funds have
insufficient cash on hand to satisfy such redemptions. When the Funds
liquidate portfolio securities to meet redemption requests, which
normally are paid immediately, they often do not receive payment in
settlement for up to three days (or longer for certain foreign
transactions). The Credit Facility would provide a source of immediate,
short-term liquidity pending settlement of the sale of portfolio
securities.
6. Applicants also propose using the Credit Facility when a sale of
securities fails due to circumstances beyond a Fund's control, such as
a delay in the delivery of cash to the Fund's custodian or improper
delivery instructions by the broker effecting the transaction. Sales
fails may present a cash shortfall if the Fund has undertaken to
purchase a security with the proceeds from securities sold. When the
Fund experiences a cash shortfall due to a sales fail, the custodian
typically extends temporary credit to cover the shortfall and the Fund
incurs overdraft charges. Alternatively, the Fund could fail on its
intended purchase due to lack of funds from the previous sale,
resulting in additional costs to the Fund, or sell a security on a same
day settlement basis, earning a lower return on the investment. Use of
the Credit Facility under these circumstances would enable the Fund to
have access to immediate short-term liquidity without incurring
custodian overdraft or other charges.
7. While bank borrowings could generally supply needed cash to
cover unanticipated redemptions and sales fails, under the Credit
Facility a borrowing Fund would pay lower interest rates than those
offered by banks on short-term loans. In addition, Funds making short-
term cash loans directly to other Funds would earn interest at a rate
higher than they otherwise could obtain from investing their cash
balances in repurchase agreements or in short-term investments. Thus,
applicants believe that the Credit Facility would benefit both
borrowing and lending Funds.
8. The interest rate charged to the Funds on any Interfund Loan
(the ``Interfund Loan Rate'') would be the average of the ``Repo Rate''
and the ``Bank Loan Rate,'' both as defined below. The Repo Rate on any
day would be the highest rate available to the Funds from investments
in overnight repurchase agreements. The Bank Loan Rate for any day
would be calculated by the Interfund Lending Committee, as defined
below, on each day an Interfund Loan is made according to a formula
approved by the Boards intended to approximate the lowest interest rate
at which bank short-term loans would be available to the Funds. The
formula would be based upon a publicly available rate (e.g., Federal
funds plus 25 basis points) and would vary with this rate so as to
reflect changing bank loan rates. Each Board periodically would review
the continuing appropriateness of using the publicly available rate
used to determine the Bank Loan Rate, as well as the relationship
between the Bank Loan Rate and current bank loan rates that would be
available to the Funds. The initial formula and any subsequent
modifications to the formula would be subject to the approval of each
Board.
9. The Credit Facility would be administered by investment
professionals and administrative personnel from Funds Management (the
``Interfund Lending Committee''). No portfolio manager of any Fund will
serve as a member of the Interfund Lending Committee. Under the Credit
Facility, the portfolio managers for each participating Fund could
provide
[[Page 26792]]
standing instructions to participate daily as a borrower or lender. On
each business day, the Interfund Lending Committee would collect data
on the uninvested cash and borrowing requirements of all participating
Funds from the Funds' custodian(s). The Money Market Funds would not
participate as borrowers. Once it has determined the aggregate amount
of cash available for loans and borrowing demand, the Interfund Lending
Committee would allocate loans among borrowing Funds without any
further communication from portfolio managers. Applicants expect far
more available uninvested cash each day than borrowing demand. After
allocating cash for Interfund Loans, the Interfund Lending Committee
will invest any remaining cash in accordance with the standing
instructions of portfolio managers or return remaining amounts for
investment directly by the portfolio manager of the applicable Fund.
10. The Interfund Lending Committee would allocate borrowing demand
and cash available for lending among the Funds on what the Interfund
Lending Committee believes to be an equitable basis, subject to certain
administrative procedures applicable to all Funds, such as the time of
filing requests to participate, minimum loan sizes, and the need to
minimize the number of transactions and associated administrative
costs. To reduce transaction costs, each Interfund Loan normally would
be allocated in a manner intended to minimize the number of
participants necessary to complete the loan transaction.
11. The Interfund Lending Committee would (a) monitor the interest
rates charged and the other terms and conditions of the loans, (b)
limit the borrowings and loans entered into by each Fund to ensure that
they comply with the Fund's investment policies and limitations, (c)
ensure equitable treatment of each Fund, and (d) make quarterly reports
to each Board concerning any transactions by the Funds under the Credit
Facility and the interest rates charged. The method of allocation and
related administrative procedures would be approved by each Board,
including a majority of trustees who are not ``interested persons'' of
the Fund, as defined in section 2(a)(19) of the Act (``Independent
Trustees''), to ensure that both borrowing and lending Funds
participate on an equitable basis.
12. Funds Management, through the Interfund Lending Committee,
would administer the Credit Facility as part of its duties under its
advisory contract and administrative contract with each Fund and would
receive no compensation for its services.
13. No Fund may participate in the Credit Facility unless (a) the
Fund has obtained shareholder approval for its participation, if such
approval is required by law, (b) the Fund has fully disclosed all
material information concerning the Credit Facility in its prospectus
and/or statement of additional information (``SAI''), and (c) the
Fund's participation in the Credit Facility is consistent with its
organizational documents and its investment policies and limitations.
14. In connection with the Credit Facility, applicants request an
order under (a) section 6(c) of the Act granting relief from sections
18(f) and 21(b) of the Act; (b) section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act granting
relief from section 12(d)(1) of the Act; (c) sections 6(c) and 17(b) of
the Act granting relief from sections 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(3) of the Act;
and (d) section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act to permit
certain joint arrangements.
Applicants' Legal Analysis
1. Section 17(a)(3) of the Act generally prohibits any affiliated
person, or affiliated person of an affiliated person, from borrowing
money or other property from a registered investment company. Section
21(b) generally prohibits any registered management company from
lending money or other property to any person if that person controls
or is under common control with the company. Section 2(a)(3)(C) of the
Act defines an ``affiliated person'' of another person, in part, to be
any person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with, the other person. Applicants state that the Funds
may be under common control by virtue of having Funds Management as
their common investment adviser, and\or by reason of having common
officers and/or trustees.
2. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that an exemptive order may be
granted where an exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public
interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act.
Section 17(b) authorizes the Commission to exempt a proposed
transaction from section 17(a) provided that the terms of the
transaction, including the consideration to be paid or received, are
fair and reasonable and do not involve overreaching on the part of any
person concerned, and the transaction is consistent with the policy of
the investment company as recited in its registration statement and
with the general purposes of the Act. Applicants believe that the
proposed arrangements satisfy these standards for the reasons discussed
below.
3. Applicants submit that sections 17(a)(3) and 21(b) of the Act
were intended to prevent a person with strong potential adverse
interests to and some influence over the investment decisions of a
registered investment company from causing or inducing the investment
company to engage in lending transactions that unfairly inure to the
benefit of that person and that are detrimental to the best interests
of the investment company and its shareholders. Applicants assert that
the Credit Facility transactions do not raise these concerns because
(a) Funds Management, through the Interfund Lending Committee, would
administer the program as a disinterested fiduciary; (b) all Interfund
Loans would consist only of uninvested cash reserves that a Fund
otherwise would invest in short-term repurchase agreements or other
short-term instruments; (c) the Interfund Loans would not involve a
greater risk than such other investments; (d) the lending Fund would
receive interest at a rate higher than it could obtain through such
other investments; and (e) the borrowing Fund would pay interest at a
rate lower than otherwise available to it under its bank loan
agreements and avoid the up-front commitment fees associated with
committed lines of credit. Moreover, applicants believe that the other
conditions in the application would effectively preclude the
possibility of any Fund obtaining an undue advantage over any other
Fund.
4. Section 17(a)(1) of the Act generally prohibits an affiliated
person of a registered investment company, or an affiliated person of
an affiliated person, from selling any securities or other property to
the company. Section 12(d)(1) of the Act generally makes it unlawful
for a registered investment company to purchase or otherwise acquire
any security issued by any other investment company except in
accordance with the limitations set forth in that section. Applicants
state that the obligation of a borrowing Fund to repay an Interfund
Loan may constitute a security under sections 17(a)(1) and 12(d)(1) of
the Act. Section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act provides that the Commission
may exempt persons or transactions from any provision of section
12(d)(1) if and to the extent such exemption is consistent with the
public interest and the protection of investors. Applicants contend
that the standards under sections 6(c), 17(b), and 12(d)(1) of the Act
are satisfied for all the reasons set forth above in support of their
request for relief from sections 17(a)(3) and
[[Page 26793]]
21(b) of the Act and for the reasons discussed below.
5. Applicants state that section 12(d)(1) of the Act was intended
to prevent the pyramiding of investment companies in order to avoid
duplicative costs and fees attendant upon multiple layers of
investments. Applicants submit that the Credit Facility does not
involve those abuses. Applicants note that there would be no
duplicative costs or fees to the Funds or to Fund shareholders, and
that Funds Management would receive no additional compensation for its
services in administering the Credit Facility. Applicants also note
that the purpose of the Credit Facility is to provide economic benefits
for all the participating Funds.
6. Section 18(f)(1) of the Act prohibits open-end investment
companies from issuing any senior security except that a company is
permitted to borrow from any bank, if immediately after the borrowing,
there is an asset coverage of at least 300% for all borrowings of the
company. Under section 18(g) of the Act, the term ``senior security''
includes any bond, debenture, note, or similar obligation or instrument
constituting a security and evidencing indebtedness. Applicants request
exemptive relief from section 18(f)(1) to the limited extent necessary
to implement the Credit Facility (because the lending Funds are not
banks).
7. Applicants believe that granting relief under section 6(c) of
the Act is appropriate because the Funds would remain subject to the
requirement of section 18(f)(1) of the Act that all borrowings of a
Fund, including combined interfund and bank borrowings, have at least
300% asset coverage. Based on the conditions and safeguards described
in the application, applicants also submit that to allow the Funds to
borrow from other Funds pursuant to the Credit Facility is consistent
with the purposes and policies of section 18(f)(1) of the Act.
8. Section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act generally
prohibit any affiliated person of a registered investment company, or
affiliated person of an affiliated person, when acting as principal,
from effecting any joint transaction in which the company participates
unless the transaction is approved by the Commission. Rule 17d-1
provides that in passing upon applications filed under the rule, the
Commission will consider whether the participation of a registered
investment company in a joint enterprise on the basis proposed is
consistent with the provisions, policies, and purposes of the Act and
the extent to which the company's participation is on a basis different
from or less advantageous than that of other participants.
9. Applicants submit that the purpose of section 17(d) is to avoid
overreaching by and unfair advantage to investment company insiders.
Applicants believe that the Credit Facility is consistent with the
provisions, policies and purposes of the Act in that it offers both
reduced borrowing costs and enhanced returns on loaned funds to all
participating Funds and their shareholders. Applicants note that each
Fund would have an equal opportunity to borrow and lend on equal terms
consistent with its investment policies and fundamental investment
limitations. Applicants therefore believe that each Fund's
participation in the Credit Facility would be on terms no different
from or less advantageous than that of other participating Funds.
Applicants' Conditions
Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief will
be subject to the following conditions:
1. The Interfund Loan Rate to be charged to the Funds under the
Credit Facility will be the average of the Repo Rate and the Bank Loan
Rate.
2. On each business day, the Interfund Lending Committee will
compare the Bank Loan Rate with the Repo Rate and will make cash
available for Interfund Loans only if the Interfund Loan Rate is (a)
more favorable to the lending Fund than the Repo Rate and (b) more
favorable to the borrowing Fund than the Bank Loan Rate.
3. If a Fund has outstanding borrowings, any Interfund Loans to the
Fund (a) will be at an interest rate equal to or lower than any
outstanding bank loan, (b) will be secured at least on an equal
priority basis with at least an equivalent percentage of collateral to
loan value as any outstanding bank loan that requires collateral, (c)
will have a maturity no longer than any outstanding bank loan (and in
any event not over seven days), and (d) will provide that, if an event
of default occurs under any agreement evidencing an outstanding bank
loan to the Fund, that event of default will automatically (without
need for action or notice by the lending Fund) constitute an immediate
event of default under the Interfund Lending Agreement entitling the
lending Fund to call the Interfund Loan (and exercise all rights with
respect to any collateral) and that such call will be made if the
lending bank exercises its right to call its loan under its agreement
with the borrowing Fund.
4. A Fund may make an unsecured borrowing through the Credit
Facility if its outstanding borrowings from all sources immediately
after the interfund borrowing total 10% or less of its total assets,
provided that if the Fund has a secured loan outstanding from any other
lender, including but not limited to another Fund, the Fund's interfund
borrowing will be secured on at least an equal priority basis with at
least an equivalent percentage of collateral to loan value as any
outstanding loan that requires collateral. If a Fund's total
outstanding borrowings immediately after an interfund borrowing would
be greater than 10% of its total assets, the Fund may borrow through
the Credit Facility on a secured basis only. A Fund may not borrow
through the Credit Facility or from any other source if its total
outstanding borrowings immediately after the interfund borrowing would
be more than 33\1/3\% of its total assets.
5. Before any Fund that has outstanding interfund borrowings may,
through additional borrowings, cause its outstanding borrowings from
all sources to exceed 10% of its total assets, the Fund must first
secure each outstanding Interfund Loan by the pledge of segregated
collateral with a market value at least equal to 102% of the
outstanding principal value of the loan. If the total outstanding
borrowings of a Fund with outstanding Interfund Loans exceeds 10% of
its total assets for any other reason (such as a decline in net asset
value or because of shareholder redemptions), the Fund will within one
business day thereafter (a) repay all its outstanding Interfund Loans,
(b) reduce its outstanding indebtedness to 10% or less of its total
assets, or (c) secure each outstanding Interfund Loan by the pledge of
segregated collateral with a market value at least equal to 102% of the
outstanding principal value of the loan until the Fund's total
outstanding borrowings cease to exceed 10% of its total assets, at
which time the collateral called for by this condition 5 shall no
longer be required. Until each Interfund Loan that is outstanding at
any time that a Fund's total outstanding borrowings exceeds 10% is
repaid or the Fund's total outstanding borrowings cease to exceed 10%
of its total assets, the Fund will mark the value of the collateral to
market each day and will pledge such additional collateral as is
necessary to maintain the market value of the collateral that secures
each outstanding Interfund Loan at least equal to 102% of the
outstanding principal value of the loan.
6. No Fund may lend to another Fund through the Credit Facility if
the loan would cause its aggregate outstanding loans through the Credit
Facility to
[[Page 26794]]
exceed 15% of its net assets at the time of the loan.
7. A Fund's Interfund Loans to any one Fund shall not exceed 5% of
the lending Fund's net assets.
8. The duration of Interfund Loans will be limited to the time
required to receive payment for securities sold, but in no event more
than seven days. Loans effected within seven days of each other will be
treated as separate loan transactions for purposes of this condition.
9. A Fund's borrowings through the Credit Facility, as measured on
the day when the most recent loan was made, will not exceed the greater
of 125% of the Fund's total net cash redemptions or 102% of sales fails
for the preceding seven calendar days.
10. Each Interfund Loan may be called on one business day's notice
by a lending Fund and may be repaid on any day by a borrowing Fund.
11. A Fund's participation in the Credit Facility must be
consistent with its investment policies and limitations and
organizational documents.
12. The Interfund Lending Committee will calculate total Fund
borrowing and lending demand through the Credit Facility, and allocate
loans on an equitable basis among the Funds without the intervention of
any portfolio manager of the Funds. The Interfund Lending Committee
will not solicit cash for the Credit Facility from any Fund or
prospectively publish or disseminate loan demand data to portfolio
managers. The Interfund Lending Committee will invest any amounts
remaining after satisfaction of borrowing demand in accordance with the
standing instructions from portfolio managers or return remaining
amounts to Funds for investment directly by the Funds.
13. The Interfund Lending Committee will monitor the interest rates
charged and the other terms and conditions of the Interfund Loans and
will make a quarterly report to the Board of each Fund concerning the
participation of the Fund in the Credit Facility and the terms and
other conditions of any extensions of credit under the facility.
14. The Boards of the Funds, including a majority of the
Independent Trustees: (a) will review no less frequently than quarterly
each Fund's participation in the Credit Facility during the preceding
quarter for compliance with the conditions of any order permitting such
transactions; (b) will establish the Bank Loan Rate formula used to
determine the interest rate on Interfund Loans, approve any
modifications thereto, and review no less frequently than annually the
continuing appropriateness of the Bank Loan Rate formula; and (c) will
review no less frequently than annually the continuing appropriateness
of the Fund's participation in the Credit Facility.
15. In the event an Interfund Loan is not paid according to its
terms and the default is not cured within two business days from its
maturity or from the time the lending Fund makes a demand for payment
under the provisions of the Interfund Lending Agreement, the Interfund
Lending Committee will promptly refer such loan for arbitration to an
independent arbitrator selected by the Board of any Fund involved in
the loan who will serve as the arbitrator of disputes concerning
Interfund Loans.\3\ The arbitrator will resolve any problem promptly,
and the arbitrator's decision will be binding on both Funds. The
arbitrator will submit, at least annually, a written report to the
Board of each Fund setting forth a description of the nature of any
dispute and the actions taken by the Funds to resolve the dispute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ If the dispute involves Funds with different Boards, the
respective Board of each Fund will select an independent arbitrator
that is satisfactory to each of them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
16. Each Fund will maintain and preserve for a period of not less
than six years from the end of the fiscal year in which any transaction
under the Credit Facility occurred, the first two years in an easily
accessible place, written records of all such transactions setting
forth a description of the terms of the transaction, including the
amount, the maturity, and the rate of interest on the loan, the rate of
interest available at the time on short-term repurchase agreements and
bank borrowings, and such other information presented to the Fund's
Board in connection with the review required by conditions 13 and 14.
17. The Interfund Lending Committee will prepare and submit to the
Boards for review an initial report describing the operations of the
Credit Facility and the procedures to be implemented to ensure that all
Funds are treated fairly. After the commencement of operation of the
Credit Facility, the Interfund Lending Committee will report on the
operations of the Credit Facility at the quarterly meetings of each
Fund's Board. In addition, for two years following the commencement of
the Credit Facility, the independent public accountant for each Fund
shall prepare an annual report that evaluates the Interfund Lending
Committee's assertion that it has established procedures reasonably
designed to achieve compliance with the conditions of the order. The
report shall be prepared in accordance with the Statements on Standards
for Attestation Engagements No. 10 and it shall be filed pursuant to
Item 77Q3 of Form N-SAR, as such Statements or Form may be revised,
amended, or superseded from time to time. In particular, the report
shall address procedures designed to achieve the following objectives:
(a) That the Interfund Loan Rate will be higher than the Repo Rate, but
lower than the Bank Loan Rate; (b) compliance with the collateral
requirements as set forth in the application; (c) compliance with the
percentage limitations on interfund borrowing and lending; (d)
allocation of interfund borrowing and lending demand in an equitable
manner and in accordance with procedures established by each Board; and
(e) that the interest rate on any Interfund Loan does not exceed the
interest rate on any outstanding third party borrowings of a borrowing
Fund at the time of the Interfund Loan. After the final report is
filed, the independent public accountant for the Fund in connection
with Fund audit examinations, will continue to review the operation of
the Credit Facility for compliance with the conditions of the
application and their review will form the basis, in part, of the
auditor's report on internal accounting controls in Form N-SAR.
18. No Fund will participate in the Credit Facility unless it has
fully disclosed in its prospectus or SAI all material facts about its
intended participation.
19. The Board of each Fund will satisfy the fund governance
standards as defined in Rule 0-1(a)(7) under the Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-6913 Filed 5-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P