University of Connecticut, et al., Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications, for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscopes, 26047-26048 [E6-6675]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 2006 / Notices
confirmed that the final quantity
amount of the U.S. sale was not known
until Turkish Customs weighed the
shipment.5 Therefore, the final terms of
the U.S. sale were not finalized until the
shipment was officially weighed and
invoiced upon shipment to the
customer.
Preliminary Results of Review
As a result of this review, we
preliminarily determine that the
following margin exists for the period
May 1, 2004, through April 30, 2005:
Manufacturer/Exporter
Margin (percent)
Toscelik .........................
0.00 percent
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
We will disclose the calculations used
in our analysis to parties to this
proceeding within five days of the
publication date of this notice. See
section 351.224(b) of the Department’s
regulations. Interested parties are
invited to comment on the preliminary
results. Interested parties may submit
case briefs within 30 days of the date of
publication of this notice. Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, may be filed no later than 37
days after the date of publication of this
notice. Parties who submit arguments
are requested to submit with each
argument: (1) A statement of the issue,
(2) a brief summary of the argument,
and (3) a table of authorities. Further,
parties submitting written comments
should provide the Department with an
additional copy of the public version of
any such comments on a diskette. Any
interested party may request a hearing
within 30 days of publication of this
notice. See 19 CFR 351.310(c). If
requested, a hearing will be held 44
days after the publication of this notice,
or the first workday thereafter. The
Department will publish a notice of the
final results of this administrative
review, which will include the results of
its analysis of issues raised in any
written comments or hearing, within
120 days from publication of this notice.
Assessment
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b), the
Department calculated an assessment
rate for each importer of subject
merchandise. Upon completion of this
review, the Department will instruct
CBP to assess antidumping duties on all
entries of subject merchandise by those
importers. We have calculated each
importer’s duty assessment rate based
on the ratio of the total amount of
antidumping duties calculated for the
examined sales to the total calculated
5 See
Id. at 9-10.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:23 May 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
entered value of examined sales. Where
the assessment rate is above de minimis,
the importer–specific rate will be
assessed uniformly on all entries made
during the POR.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Bonding is no longer permitted to
fulfill security requirements for
shipments from Toscelik of certain
welded carbon steel pipe and tube from
Turkey entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the publication date of these final
results of new shipper review. The
following cash–deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
final results of this new shipper review
for all shipments of subject
merchandise, entered or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the publication date as provided
for by sections 751(a)(1) and 751
(a)(2)(C) of the Act:
• for subject merchandise
manufactured and exported by
Toscelik, the cash deposit rate shall
be 0.00 percent;
• for subject merchandise exported by
Toscelik but not manufactured by
Toscelik, the cash–deposit rate will
continue to be the ‘‘All Others’’ rate
or the rate applicable to the
manufacturer, if so established;
• the cash deposit rate for exporters
who received a rate in a prior
segment of the proceeding will
continue to be the rate assigned in
that segment of the proceeding;
• if the exporter is not a firm covered
in this review or in any previous
segment of this proceeding, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit
rate will be that established for the
manufacturer in the most recent
segment of this proceeding in
which that manufacturer
participated;
• if neither the exporter nor the
manufacturer is a firm covered in
this review or in any previous
segment of this proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will be 14.74 percent,
the All Others rate established in
the less–than-fair–value
investigation.
These deposit requirements shall
remain in effect until publication of the
final results of the next administrative
review.
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26047
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
preliminary results of new shipper
review and notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the
Act.
Dated: April 26, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–6676 Filed 5–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
University of Connecticut, et al., Notice
of Consolidated Decision on
Applications, for Duty–Free Entry of
Electron Microscopes
This is a decision consolidated pursuant
to Section 6(c) of the Educational,
Scientific, and Cultural Materials
Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).
Related records can be viewed between
8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Suite 4100W,
Franklin Court Building, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1099 14th
Street, NW., Washington, DC.
Docket Number: 06–007. Applicant:
University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT
06269. Instrument: Electron Microscope,
Model Technai G2 Spirit BioTWIN.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, The
Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at
71 FR 18082, April 10, 2006. Order
Date: April 15, 2005.
Docket Number: 06–009. Applicant: The
New York Structural Biology
Laboratory, New York, NY 10027.
Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model
JEM–2100F. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd.,
Japan.Intended Use: See notice at 71 FR
18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date: May
26, 2005.
Docket Number: 06–010. Applicant:
Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA
30322. Instrument: Electron Microscope,
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
26048
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 2006 / Notices
Model Morgagni 268. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, The Netherlands. Intended
Use: See notice at 71 FR 18082, April
10, 2006. Order Date: September 1 2005.
Docket Number: 06–011 Applicant:
President and Fellows of Harvard
College, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model
JEM–2100. Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd.,
Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 71 FR
18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date: June
17, 2005.
Docket Number: 06–013. Applicant:
Ames Laboratory - U.S. Department of
Energy, Ames, Iowa 50011–3020.
Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model
Technai G2 F20 X–TWIN. Manufacturer:
FEI Company, The Netherlands.
Intended Use: See notice at 71 FR
18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date:
September 7, 2005.
Comments: None received. Decision:
Approved. No instrument of equivalent
scientific value to the foreign
instrument, for such purposes as these
instruments are intended to be used,
was being manufactured in the United
States at the time the instruments were
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign
instrument is a conventional
transmission electron microscope
(CTEM) and is intended for research or
scientific educational uses requiring a
CTEM. We know of no CTEM, or any
other instrument suited to these
purposes, which was being
manufactured in the United States
either at the time of order of each
instrument OR at the time of receipt of
application by U.S. Customs and Border
Protection.
Gerald A. Zerdy,
Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs
Staff.
[FR Doc. E6–6675 Filed 5–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Applications for Duty–Free Entry of
Scientific Instruments
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.
L. 89–651; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part
301), we invite comments on the
question of whether instruments of
equivalent scientific value, for the
purposes for which the instruments
shown below are intended to be used,
are being manufactured in the United
States.
Comments must comply with 15 CFR
301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and
be filed within 20 days with the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:23 May 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S.
Department of Commerce, Washington,
DC 20230. Applications may be
examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m.
in Suite 4100W, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Franklin Court Building,
1099 14th Street, NW, Washington, DC
Docket Number: 06–015. Applicant:
University of Kentucky, Department of
Chemistry, 235 Chem–Phys. Bldg.,
Lexington, KY 40506–0055. Instrument:
Optical Parametric Oscillator System.
Manufacturer: GWU Lasertechnik,
Germany. Intended Use: The instrument
is intended to be used to study small
silicon, germanium, phosphorus and
boron containing molecules in the gas
phase using the technique of laser–
induced fluorescence to develop
methods for identifying and
characterizing these molecules and to
determine their molecular energy levels
and geometries and to quantify these
reactive molecules in laboratory and
industrial environments. Application
accepted by Commissioner of Customs:
March 27, 2006.
Docket Number: 06–016. Applicant:
University of Maryland, Materials
Science and Engineering Department,
Building 225, Lab 1246, College Park,
MD 20742. Instrument: Electron
Microscope, Model JEM–2100.
Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan.
Intended Use: The instrument is
intended to be used to characterize
nanomaterials and nanocomposites at
the atomic level. These include
semiconductor nanostructures,
polymeric materials, metal
nanoparticles, ferroelectric/
ferromagnetic oxide nanocomposites
and semiconductor nanowires.
Properties of materials examined
include crystal structure and quality of
material, structural defects, and
morphology using techniques of
electron diffraction, high resolution
lattice imaging, bright/dark field
imaging and obtaining electron
diffraction patterns and images of areas
as small as a few nanometers in
diameter. The instrument will also be
used in courses and for conducting
individual graduate research projects.
Application accepted by Commissioner
of Customs: April 4, 2006.
Docket Number: 06–017. Applicant:
University of Michigan, Materials
Science and Engineering Dept., 3062
H.H. Dow Bldg., 2300 Hayward Street,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109–2136. Instrument:
Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing Equipment.
Manufacturer: BOKU Institute of
Physics, Austria. Intended Use: The
instrument is intended to be used to
study ultra–high cyclic fatigue behavior
of materials in the gigacycle regime
where little data is currently available.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Measurements for understanding crack
growth behavior in various materials
will be obtained for aiding in the
prediction of lifetime behavior with
cyclic loading frequencies to 20KHz. It
will also be used to characterize new
materials being developed to perform
under high cyclic loading conditions,
such as next generation superalloys
used in aircraft and power generating
turbines. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: April 10,
2006.
Gerald A. Zerdy,
Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs
Staff.
[FR Doc. E6–6677 Filed 5–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Export Trade Certificate Of Review
Notice of revocation of Export
Trade Certificate of Review Application
No. 03–00004.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Secretary of Commerce
issued an Export Trade Certificate of
Review to NYVZ Import & Export Inc.
on November 10, 2003. Because this
Certificate Holder has failed to file an
annual report as required by law, the
Secretary is revoking the certificate.
This notice summarizes the notification
letter sent to NYVZ Import & Export Inc.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Anspacher, Director, Export
Trading Company Affairs, International
Trade Administration, 202/482–5131.
This is not a toll-free number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of
the Export Trading Company Act of
1982 (‘‘The Act’’) (Pub. L. 97–290, 15
U.S.C. 4011–21) Authorizes the
Secretary of Commerce to Issue Export
Trade Certificates of Review. The
Regulations Implementing Title III (‘‘the
Regulations’’) are found at 15 CFR part
325 (1999). Pursuant to this Authority,
a Certificate of Review was issued on
November 10, 2003 to NYVZ Import &
Export Inc.
A Certificate Holder is required by
law to submit to the Secretary of
Commerce Annual Reports that update
financial and other information relating
to business activities covered by its
Certificate (Section 308 of the Act, 15
U.S.C. 4018, section 325.14(a) of the
Regulations, 15 CFR 325.14(a)).
The Annual Report is due within 45
days after the Anniversary Date of the
Issuance of the Certificate of Review
(Sections 325.14(b) of the Regulations,
15 CFR 325.14(b)). Failure to submit a
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26047-26048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-6675]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
University of Connecticut, et al., Notice of Consolidated
Decision on Applications, for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscopes
This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966
(Pub. L. 89-651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be
viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Suite 4100W, Franklin Court
Building, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1099 14th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC.
Docket Number: 06-007. Applicant: University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT
06269. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model Technai G[bds2] Spirit
BioTWIN. Manufacturer: FEI Company, The Netherlands. Intended Use: See
notice at 71 FR 18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date: April 15, 2005.
Docket Number: 06-009. Applicant: The New York Structural Biology
Laboratory, New York, NY 10027. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model
JEM-2100F. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan.Intended Use: See notice at
71 FR 18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date: May 26, 2005.
Docket Number: 06-010. Applicant: Emory University Hospital, Atlanta,
GA 30322. Instrument: Electron Microscope,
[[Page 26048]]
Model Morgagni 268. Manufacturer: FEI Company, The Netherlands.
Intended Use: See notice at 71 FR 18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date:
September 1 2005.
Docket Number: 06-011 Applicant: President and Fellows of Harvard
College, Cambridge, MA 02138. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model
JEM-2100. Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at
71 FR 18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date: June 17, 2005.
Docket Number: 06-013. Applicant: Ames Laboratory - U.S. Department of
Energy, Ames, Iowa 50011-3020. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model
Technai G[bds2] F20 X-TWIN. Manufacturer: FEI Company, The Netherlands.
Intended Use: See notice at 71 FR 18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date:
September 7, 2005.
Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such
purposes as these instruments are intended to be used, was being
manufactured in the United States at the time the instruments were
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is a conventional
transmission electron microscope (CTEM) and is intended for research or
scientific educational uses requiring a CTEM. We know of no CTEM, or
any other instrument suited to these purposes, which was being
manufactured in the United States either at the time of order of each
instrument OR at the time of receipt of application by U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
Gerald A. Zerdy,
Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. E6-6675 Filed 5-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
