University of Connecticut, et al., Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications, for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscopes, 26047-26048 [E6-6675]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 2006 / Notices confirmed that the final quantity amount of the U.S. sale was not known until Turkish Customs weighed the shipment.5 Therefore, the final terms of the U.S. sale were not finalized until the shipment was officially weighed and invoiced upon shipment to the customer. Preliminary Results of Review As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that the following margin exists for the period May 1, 2004, through April 30, 2005: Manufacturer/Exporter Margin (percent) Toscelik ......................... 0.00 percent jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES We will disclose the calculations used in our analysis to parties to this proceeding within five days of the publication date of this notice. See section 351.224(b) of the Department’s regulations. Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results. Interested parties may submit case briefs within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than 37 days after the date of publication of this notice. Parties who submit arguments are requested to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue, (2) a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of authorities. Further, parties submitting written comments should provide the Department with an additional copy of the public version of any such comments on a diskette. Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of this notice. See 19 CFR 351.310(c). If requested, a hearing will be held 44 days after the publication of this notice, or the first workday thereafter. The Department will publish a notice of the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in any written comments or hearing, within 120 days from publication of this notice. Assessment Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department calculated an assessment rate for each importer of subject merchandise. Upon completion of this review, the Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all entries of subject merchandise by those importers. We have calculated each importer’s duty assessment rate based on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the total calculated 5 See Id. at 9-10. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:23 May 02, 2006 Jkt 208001 entered value of examined sales. Where the assessment rate is above de minimis, the importer–specific rate will be assessed uniformly on all entries made during the POR. Cash Deposit Requirements Bonding is no longer permitted to fulfill security requirements for shipments from Toscelik of certain welded carbon steel pipe and tube from Turkey entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of these final results of new shipper review. The following cash–deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this new shipper review for all shipments of subject merchandise, entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date as provided for by sections 751(a)(1) and 751 (a)(2)(C) of the Act: • for subject merchandise manufactured and exported by Toscelik, the cash deposit rate shall be 0.00 percent; • for subject merchandise exported by Toscelik but not manufactured by Toscelik, the cash–deposit rate will continue to be the ‘‘All Others’’ rate or the rate applicable to the manufacturer, if so established; • the cash deposit rate for exporters who received a rate in a prior segment of the proceeding will continue to be the rate assigned in that segment of the proceeding; • if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or in any previous segment of this proceeding, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be that established for the manufacturer in the most recent segment of this proceeding in which that manufacturer participated; • if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this review or in any previous segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will be 14.74 percent, the All Others rate established in the less–than-fair–value investigation. These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until publication of the final results of the next administrative review. This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 26047 could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results of new shipper review and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: April 26, 2006. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6–6676 Filed 5–2–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration University of Connecticut, et al., Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications, for Duty–Free Entry of Electron Microscopes This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89– 651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Suite 4100W, Franklin Court Building, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC. Docket Number: 06–007. Applicant: University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model Technai G2 Spirit BioTWIN. Manufacturer: FEI Company, The Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 71 FR 18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date: April 15, 2005. Docket Number: 06–009. Applicant: The New York Structural Biology Laboratory, New York, NY 10027. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model JEM–2100F. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan.Intended Use: See notice at 71 FR 18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date: May 26, 2005. Docket Number: 06–010. Applicant: Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA 30322. Instrument: Electron Microscope, E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM 03MYN1 26048 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 2006 / Notices Model Morgagni 268. Manufacturer: FEI Company, The Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 71 FR 18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date: September 1 2005. Docket Number: 06–011 Applicant: President and Fellows of Harvard College, Cambridge, MA 02138. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model JEM–2100. Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 71 FR 18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date: June 17, 2005. Docket Number: 06–013. Applicant: Ames Laboratory - U.S. Department of Energy, Ames, Iowa 50011–3020. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model Technai G2 F20 X–TWIN. Manufacturer: FEI Company, The Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 71 FR 18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date: September 7, 2005. Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such purposes as these instruments are intended to be used, was being manufactured in the United States at the time the instruments were ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is a conventional transmission electron microscope (CTEM) and is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring a CTEM. We know of no CTEM, or any other instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in the United States either at the time of order of each instrument OR at the time of receipt of application by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Gerald A. Zerdy, Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs Staff. [FR Doc. E6–6675 Filed 5–2–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Applications for Duty–Free Entry of Scientific Instruments Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–651; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether instruments of equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to be used, are being manufactured in the United States. Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and be filed within 20 days with the VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:23 May 02, 2006 Jkt 208001 Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. Applications may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Suite 4100W, U.S. Department of Commerce, Franklin Court Building, 1099 14th Street, NW, Washington, DC Docket Number: 06–015. Applicant: University of Kentucky, Department of Chemistry, 235 Chem–Phys. Bldg., Lexington, KY 40506–0055. Instrument: Optical Parametric Oscillator System. Manufacturer: GWU Lasertechnik, Germany. Intended Use: The instrument is intended to be used to study small silicon, germanium, phosphorus and boron containing molecules in the gas phase using the technique of laser– induced fluorescence to develop methods for identifying and characterizing these molecules and to determine their molecular energy levels and geometries and to quantify these reactive molecules in laboratory and industrial environments. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: March 27, 2006. Docket Number: 06–016. Applicant: University of Maryland, Materials Science and Engineering Department, Building 225, Lab 1246, College Park, MD 20742. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model JEM–2100. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: The instrument is intended to be used to characterize nanomaterials and nanocomposites at the atomic level. These include semiconductor nanostructures, polymeric materials, metal nanoparticles, ferroelectric/ ferromagnetic oxide nanocomposites and semiconductor nanowires. Properties of materials examined include crystal structure and quality of material, structural defects, and morphology using techniques of electron diffraction, high resolution lattice imaging, bright/dark field imaging and obtaining electron diffraction patterns and images of areas as small as a few nanometers in diameter. The instrument will also be used in courses and for conducting individual graduate research projects. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: April 4, 2006. Docket Number: 06–017. Applicant: University of Michigan, Materials Science and Engineering Dept., 3062 H.H. Dow Bldg., 2300 Hayward Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109–2136. Instrument: Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing Equipment. Manufacturer: BOKU Institute of Physics, Austria. Intended Use: The instrument is intended to be used to study ultra–high cyclic fatigue behavior of materials in the gigacycle regime where little data is currently available. PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Measurements for understanding crack growth behavior in various materials will be obtained for aiding in the prediction of lifetime behavior with cyclic loading frequencies to 20KHz. It will also be used to characterize new materials being developed to perform under high cyclic loading conditions, such as next generation superalloys used in aircraft and power generating turbines. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: April 10, 2006. Gerald A. Zerdy, Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs Staff. [FR Doc. E6–6677 Filed 5–2–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Export Trade Certificate Of Review Notice of revocation of Export Trade Certificate of Review Application No. 03–00004. ACTION: SUMMARY: The Secretary of Commerce issued an Export Trade Certificate of Review to NYVZ Import & Export Inc. on November 10, 2003. Because this Certificate Holder has failed to file an annual report as required by law, the Secretary is revoking the certificate. This notice summarizes the notification letter sent to NYVZ Import & Export Inc. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Anspacher, Director, Export Trading Company Affairs, International Trade Administration, 202/482–5131. This is not a toll-free number. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of the Export Trading Company Act of 1982 (‘‘The Act’’) (Pub. L. 97–290, 15 U.S.C. 4011–21) Authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to Issue Export Trade Certificates of Review. The Regulations Implementing Title III (‘‘the Regulations’’) are found at 15 CFR part 325 (1999). Pursuant to this Authority, a Certificate of Review was issued on November 10, 2003 to NYVZ Import & Export Inc. A Certificate Holder is required by law to submit to the Secretary of Commerce Annual Reports that update financial and other information relating to business activities covered by its Certificate (Section 308 of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 4018, section 325.14(a) of the Regulations, 15 CFR 325.14(a)). The Annual Report is due within 45 days after the Anniversary Date of the Issuance of the Certificate of Review (Sections 325.14(b) of the Regulations, 15 CFR 325.14(b)). Failure to submit a E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM 03MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26047-26048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-6675]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of Connecticut, et al., Notice of Consolidated 
Decision on Applications, for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscopes

This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 
(Pub. L. 89-651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be 
viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Suite 4100W, Franklin Court 
Building, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1099 14th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC.
Docket Number: 06-007. Applicant: University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 
06269. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model Technai G[bds2] Spirit 
BioTWIN. Manufacturer: FEI Company, The Netherlands. Intended Use: See 
notice at 71 FR 18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date: April 15, 2005.
Docket Number: 06-009. Applicant: The New York Structural Biology 
Laboratory, New York, NY 10027. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model 
JEM-2100F. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan.Intended Use: See notice at 
71 FR 18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date: May 26, 2005.
Docket Number: 06-010. Applicant: Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, 
GA 30322. Instrument: Electron Microscope,

[[Page 26048]]

Model Morgagni 268. Manufacturer: FEI Company, The Netherlands. 
Intended Use: See notice at 71 FR 18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date: 
September 1 2005.
Docket Number: 06-011 Applicant: President and Fellows of Harvard 
College, Cambridge, MA 02138. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model 
JEM-2100. Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 
71 FR 18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date: June 17, 2005.
Docket Number: 06-013. Applicant: Ames Laboratory - U.S. Department of 
Energy, Ames, Iowa 50011-3020. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model 
Technai G[bds2] F20 X-TWIN. Manufacturer: FEI Company, The Netherlands. 
Intended Use: See notice at 71 FR 18082, April 10, 2006. Order Date: 
September 7, 2005.
Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as these instruments are intended to be used, was being 
manufactured in the United States at the time the instruments were 
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is a conventional 
transmission electron microscope (CTEM) and is intended for research or 
scientific educational uses requiring a CTEM. We know of no CTEM, or 
any other instrument suited to these purposes, which was being 
manufactured in the United States either at the time of order of each 
instrument OR at the time of receipt of application by U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection.

Gerald A. Zerdy,
Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. E6-6675 Filed 5-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S