Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 25595-25597 [E6-6493]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
25595
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 83 / Monday, May 1, 2006 / Notices
Federal Register reprints, information
on premarket submissions (including
lists of approved applications and
manufacturers’ addresses), small
manufacturer’s assistance, information
on video conferencing and electronic
submissions, Mammography Matters,
and other device-oriented information.
The CDRH web site may be accessed at
https://www.fda.gov/cdrh. A search
capability for all CDRH guidance
documents is available at https://
www.fda.gov/cdrh/guidance.html.
Guidance documents are also available
on the Division of Dockets Management
Internet site at https://www.fda.gov/
ohrms/dockets.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Project: Strategic Prevention
Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF
SIG) Program—New
The Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration’s
(SAMHSA) Center for Substance Abuse
Prevention (CSAP) is responsible for the
Evaluation of the Strategic Prevention
Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF
SIG) Program. The program is a major
national initiative designed to: (1)
Prevent the onset and reduce the
progression of substance abuse,
including childhood and underage
drinking; (2) reduce substance abuserelated problems in communities; and,
(3) build prevention capacity and
infrastructure at the State/territory and
community levels. Five steps comprise
the SPF:
I Step 1: Profile population needs,
resources, and readiness to address
needs and gaps.
I Step 2: Mobilize and/or build
capacity to address needs.
I Step 3: Develop a comprehensive
strategic plan.
I Step 4: Implement evidence-based
prevention programs, policies, and
practices.
I Step 5: Monitor, evaluate, sustain,
and improve or replace those that fail.
Under a contract with CSAP, an
evaluation team will implement a multimethod quasi-experimental evaluation
at national, State, and community
levels. Evaluation data will be collected
from 26 states receiving grants in 2004
This guidance contains information
collection provisions that are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520). The collection(s) of
information in this guidance were
approved under OMB control number
0910–0577.
V. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES), written or electronic
comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic
comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that
individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Comments
received may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: April 24, 2006.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E6–6458 Filed 4–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
information collection requests under
OMB review, in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports
Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243.
and 2005 and as many as 32 non-grantee
states that will serve as a comparison
group. The primary evaluation objective
is to determine the impact of SPF SIG
on the SAMHSA National Outcome
Measures (NOMs).
This notice invites comment on statelevel and community-level data
collection instruments. The instruments
for assessing state-level change will be
included in an OMB review package
submitted immediately after the
expiration of the comment period and
are the main focus of this
announcement. These instruments will
be reviewed first by OMB to ensure that
state-level data collection occurs as
specified in the evaluation plan (on or
before June 30, 2006). Because the states
have not awarded community-level
funding, the evaluators will not initiate
community-level data collection until
late in 2006. Thus, the community-level
survey will be submitted as an
addendum approximately one month
after the comment period expires.
However, the instrument is described in
this notice and comments on the
instrument are invited.
State-Level Data Collection
Two instruments were developed for
assessing state-level effects. Both
instruments are guides for telephone
interviews that will be conducted by
trained interviewers three to four times
over the life of the SPF SIG award. The
Strategic Prevention Framework Index
will be used to assess the relationship
between SPF implementation and
change in the national outcome
measures. The State Infrastructure
Index will capture data to assess
infrastructure change and to test the
relationship of this change to outcomes.
Prevention infrastructure refers to the
organizational features of the system
that delivers prevention services,
including all procedures related to
planning, data management systems,
workforce development, intervention
implementation, evaluation and
monitoring, financial management, and
sustainability. The estimated annual
burden for state-level data collection is
displayed below in the table.
STATE LEVEL BURDEN ESTIMATE
[Year 1]
cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Interview guide
SPF Implementation
Index.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Number of
respondents
Content description
SEW activities, indicators for each SPF step, including cultural competence throughout all
five steps.
18:29 Apr 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Number of
responses
26
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
Hourly burden
per response
1
01MYN1
3
Total hourly
burden
78
25596
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 83 / Monday, May 1, 2006 / Notices
STATE LEVEL BURDEN ESTIMATE—Continued
[Year 1]
Interview guide
State Infrastructure
Index.
Total State Level ....
Number of
respondents
Content description
Number of
responses
Hourly burden
per response
Total hourly
burden
Assessment of a state’s progress over time toward the implementation of these best practices.
26
1
6
156
..............................................................................
26
........................
........................
234
Community-Level Data Collection
The Community Level Index is a twopart, web-based survey for capturing
information about SPF SIG
implementation at the community level.
Part 1 of the survey focuses on the five
SPF SIG steps and efforts to ensure
cultural competency throughout the SPF
SIG process. Part 2 will capture data on
the specific intervention(s)
implemented at the community level
including both individual-focused and
environmental prevention strategies.
Community partners receiving SPF SIG
awards will be required to complete the
survey every six months, using a secure
password system. The survey data will
be analyzed in conjunction with state
and community outcome data to
determine the relationship, if any,
between the SPF process and substance
use outcomes. This survey will be
submitted as an addendum to the
forthcoming OMB package
approximately one month after the
expiration of the comment period. The
estimated annual burden for
community-level data collection is
displayed below. Note that the total
burden assumes an average of 15
community-level sub-grantees per state
(a total of 390 respondents) and two
survey administrations per year. Note
also that some questions will be
addressed only once and the responses
will be used to pre-fill subsequent
surveys. In addition, as community
partners work through the SPF steps,
they will report only on step-related
activities. For example, needs
assessment activities will likely precede
monitoring and evaluation activities.
Thus, respondents will answer
questions related to needs assessment in
the first few reports but will not need to
address monitoring and evaluation
items until later in the implementation
process.
COMMUNITY LEVEL BURDEN ESTIMATE
Number of
respondents
Community-level instrument section/domain
Responses
per
respondent
Burden per
response
Total burden
Year 1
Part I, 1–11 State Responses .......................................................................
Part I, 12–20 Contact Information and Reporting Period .............................
Part I, 21–26 Organization Type and Funding ..............................................
Part I, 27–33 Cultural Competence, Sustainability, and Framework
Progress .......................................................................................................
Part I, 34–66 Needs and Resources Assessments ......................................
Part I, 67–159 Capacity Building Activities ...................................................
Part I, 160–178 Strategic Plan Development ................................................
Part I, 198–216 Systems and Contextual Factors and Closing Questions ..
Part I, subform 217–231 Coalition Organizational Information .....................
Part II 1–40; 45 Intervention Specific Information and Adaptations .............
Review of past responses ...............................................................................
Preparation and gathering of supporting materials .........................................
State Review of Community Responses .........................................................
26
390
390
1
1
1
0.08
0.08
0.08
2.08
31.20
31.20
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
26
2
2
2
2
2
1
3
2
2
2
0.17
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.00
0.17
1.00
0.50
2.00
1.00
132.60
390.00
390.00
390.00
780.00
66.30
1,170.00
390.00
1,560.00
52.00
Total Year 1 Burden—State-level .............................................................
26
........................
........................
54.08
Total Year 1 Burden—Community-level ...................................................
390
........................
........................
5,331
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
26
26
2
2
2
2
2
3
6
6
2
2
2
........................
0.17
0.50
0.50
0.17
1.00
1.00
0.17
1.00
0.50
2.00
1.00
........................
132.60
390.00
390.00
132.60
780.00
1,170.00
397.80
2,340.00
390.00
1,560.00
52.00
52.00
cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Year 2
Part I, 27–33 Cultural Competence, Sustainability, and Framework
Progress .......................................................................................................
Part I, 67–15 Capacity Building Activities ....................................................
Part I, 160–178 Strategic Plan Development ................................................
Part I, 179–184 Intervention Implementation ................................................
Part I, 198–216 Systems and Contextual Factors and Closing Questions ..
Part II 1–40; 45 Intervention Specific Information and Adaptations .............
Part II 41–44 Intervention Outcomes ............................................................
Part II subforms Intervention Component Information ....................................
Review of past responses ...............................................................................
Preparation and gathering of supporting materials .........................................
State Review of Community Responses .........................................................
Total Year 2 Burden—State-level .............................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Apr 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
01MYN1
25597
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 83 / Monday, May 1, 2006 / Notices
COMMUNITY LEVEL BURDEN ESTIMATE—Continued
Responses
per
respondent
Burden per
response
390
........................
........................
7,683
Part I, 27–33 Cultural Competence, Sustainability, and Framework
Progress .......................................................................................................
Part I, 67–159 Capacity Building Activities ...................................................
Part I, 179–184 Intervention Implementation ................................................
Part I, 185–197 Monitoring and Evaluation ...................................................
Part I, 198–216 Systems and Contextual Factors and Closing Questions ..
Part II 1–40; 45 Intervention Specific Information and Adaptations .............
Part II 41–44 Intervention Outcomes ..............................................................
Part II subforms Intervention Component Information ....................................
Review of past responses ...............................................................................
Preparation and gathering of supporting materials .........................................
State Review of Community Responses .........................................................
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
26
2
2
2
2
2
3
6
6
2
2
2
0.17
0.50
0.17
0.33
1.00
1.00
0.17
1.00
0.50
2.00
1.00
132.60
390.00
132.60
257.40
780.00
1,170.00
397.80
2,340.00
390.00
1,560.00
52.00
Total Year 3 Burden—State-level .............................................................
26
........................
........................
52.00
Total Year 3 Burden—Community-level ...................................................
390
........................
........................
7,550.00
Total Average Annual Burden—Slate-level ..............................................
26
........................
........................
53.00
Total Average Annual Burden—Community-level ....................................
390
........................
........................
6,855.00
Number of
respondents
Community-level instrument section/domain
Total Year 2 Burden—Community-level ...................................................
Total burden
Year 3
Written comments and
recommendations concerning the
proposed information collection should
be sent by May 31, 2006 to: SAMHSA
Desk Officer, Human Resources and
Housing Branch, Office of Management
and Budget, New Executive Office
Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC
20503; due to potential delays in OMB’s
receipt and processing of mail sent
through the U.S. Postal Service,
respondents are encouraged to submit
comments by fax to: 202–395–6974.
Dated: April 24, 2006.
Anna Marsh,
Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. E6–6493 Filed 4–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Proposed Project: Opioid Treatment
Data Systems for Disaster Planning
Project (Pilot)—New
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
In compliance with Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 concerning
opportunity for public comment on
proposed collections of information, the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA)
will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Apr 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
information on the proposed projects or
to obtain a copy of the information
collection plans, call the SAMHSA
Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276–
1243.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collections of information
are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
The Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration’s
(SAMHSA), Center for Substance Abuse
Treatment (CSAT), has identified a
critical need for Opioid Treatment
Programs (OTPs, also commonly known
as Methadone Clinics) to be able to
access limited but specific patient
dosage data for patients displaced due
to service disruptions affecting the OTP
from which they regularly receive
treatment (the patient’s ’Home OTP’).
Service disruptions in home OTPs have
ranged in cause from events such as the
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
September 11th terrorist attacks or more
recently, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, to
more common events such as snow
storms or electrical black-outs.
The proposed system will ensure that,
in such circumstances, patients
displaced from their home OTPs will
still be able to obtain safe and effective
treatment at an alternative OTP (referred
to in this project as a ’Guest OTP’). In
reviewing past events involving OTP
service disruptions and their impact on
patients, SAMHSA, in tandem with
numerous stakeholders, established four
basic principles that would guide
creation of a deliberately simple,
centralized Web-based system to house
patient data. Such a system would
facilitate guest OTPs in providing safe
and effective continuity of treatment for
patients temporarily unable to obtain
treatment from their Home OTPs due to
any form of service disruption. The
proposed centralized data system is
known as the Opioid Treatment Data
Systems for Disaster. Subsequently, in a
small sample study of five (5) OTPs,
SAMHSA tested a protocol and data
collection instrument for use in
determining functional requirements for
the proposed system. In Fall 2005,
SAMHSA provided funding for the
current project, to support creation of
the necessary infrastructure for a pilot
system, to be followed by testing on a
regional basis. This pilot project will
focus on creating the means by which
vital dosage data for OTP patients can
be made accessible to guest OTPs called
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
01MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 83 (Monday, May 1, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25595-25597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-6493]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information
collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Project: Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF SIG)
Program--New
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's
(SAMHSA) Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) is responsible
for the Evaluation of the Strategic Prevention Framework State
Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) Program. The program is a major national
initiative designed to: (1) Prevent the onset and reduce the
progression of substance abuse, including childhood and underage
drinking; (2) reduce substance abuse-related problems in communities;
and, (3) build prevention capacity and infrastructure at the State/
territory and community levels. Five steps comprise the SPF:
[ssbox] Step 1: Profile population needs, resources, and readiness
to address needs and gaps.
[ssbox] Step 2: Mobilize and/or build capacity to address needs.
[ssbox] Step 3: Develop a comprehensive strategic plan.
[ssbox] Step 4: Implement evidence-based prevention programs,
policies, and practices.
[ssbox] Step 5: Monitor, evaluate, sustain, and improve or replace
those that fail.
Under a contract with CSAP, an evaluation team will implement a
multi-method quasi-experimental evaluation at national, State, and
community levels. Evaluation data will be collected from 26 states
receiving grants in 2004 and 2005 and as many as 32 non-grantee states
that will serve as a comparison group. The primary evaluation objective
is to determine the impact of SPF SIG on the SAMHSA National Outcome
Measures (NOMs).
This notice invites comment on state-level and community-level data
collection instruments. The instruments for assessing state-level
change will be included in an OMB review package submitted immediately
after the expiration of the comment period and are the main focus of
this announcement. These instruments will be reviewed first by OMB to
ensure that state-level data collection occurs as specified in the
evaluation plan (on or before June 30, 2006). Because the states have
not awarded community-level funding, the evaluators will not initiate
community-level data collection until late in 2006. Thus, the
community-level survey will be submitted as an addendum approximately
one month after the comment period expires. However, the instrument is
described in this notice and comments on the instrument are invited.
State-Level Data Collection
Two instruments were developed for assessing state-level effects.
Both instruments are guides for telephone interviews that will be
conducted by trained interviewers three to four times over the life of
the SPF SIG award. The Strategic Prevention Framework Index will be
used to assess the relationship between SPF implementation and change
in the national outcome measures. The State Infrastructure Index will
capture data to assess infrastructure change and to test the
relationship of this change to outcomes. Prevention infrastructure
refers to the organizational features of the system that delivers
prevention services, including all procedures related to planning, data
management systems, workforce development, intervention implementation,
evaluation and monitoring, financial management, and sustainability.
The estimated annual burden for state-level data collection is
displayed below in the table.
State Level Burden Estimate
[Year 1]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Number of Hourly burden Total hourly
Interview guide Content description respondents responses per response burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SPF Implementation Index....................... SEW activities, indicators for each SPF 26 1 3 78
step, including cultural competence
throughout all five steps.
[[Page 25596]]
State Infrastructure Index..................... Assessment of a state's progress over 26 1 6 156
time toward the implementation of
these best practices.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total State Level.......................... ....................................... 26 .............. .............. 234
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community-Level Data Collection
The Community Level Index is a two-part, web-based survey for
capturing information about SPF SIG implementation at the community
level. Part 1 of the survey focuses on the five SPF SIG steps and
efforts to ensure cultural competency throughout the SPF SIG process.
Part 2 will capture data on the specific intervention(s) implemented at
the community level including both individual-focused and environmental
prevention strategies. Community partners receiving SPF SIG awards will
be required to complete the survey every six months, using a secure
password system. The survey data will be analyzed in conjunction with
state and community outcome data to determine the relationship, if any,
between the SPF process and substance use outcomes. This survey will be
submitted as an addendum to the forthcoming OMB package approximately
one month after the expiration of the comment period. The estimated
annual burden for community-level data collection is displayed below.
Note that the total burden assumes an average of 15 community-level
sub-grantees per state (a total of 390 respondents) and two survey
administrations per year. Note also that some questions will be
addressed only once and the responses will be used to pre-fill
subsequent surveys. In addition, as community partners work through the
SPF steps, they will report only on step-related activities. For
example, needs assessment activities will likely precede monitoring and
evaluation activities. Thus, respondents will answer questions related
to needs assessment in the first few reports but will not need to
address monitoring and evaluation items until later in the
implementation process.
Community Level Burden Estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Responses per Burden per
Community-level instrument section/domain respondents respondent response Total burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part I, 1-11 State Responses.................... 26 1 0.08 2.08
Part I, 12-20 Contact Information and Reporting 390 1 0.08 31.20
Period.........................................
Part I, 21-26 Organization Type and Funding..... 390 1 0.08 31.20
Part I, 27-33 Cultural Competence, 390 2 0.17 132.60
Sustainability, and Framework Progress.........
Part I, 34-66 Needs and Resources Assessments... 390 2 0.50 390.00
Part I, 67-159 Capacity Building Activities..... 390 2 0.50 390.00
Part I, 160-178 Strategic Plan Development...... 390 2 0.50 390.00
Part I, 198-216 Systems and Contextual Factors 390 2 1.00 780.00
and Closing Questions..........................
Part I, subform 217-231 Coalition Organizational 390 1 0.17 66.30
Information....................................
Part II 1-40; 45 Intervention Specific 390 3 1.00 1,170.00
Information and Adaptations....................
Review of past responses........................ 390 2 0.50 390.00
Preparation and gathering of supporting 390 2 2.00 1,560.00
materials......................................
State Review of Community Responses............. 26 2 1.00 52.00
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total Year 1 Burden--State-level............ 26 .............. .............. 54.08
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total Year 1 Burden--Community-level........ 390 .............. .............. 5,331
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part I, 27-33 Cultural Competence, 390 2 0.17 132.60
Sustainability, and Framework Progress.........
Part I, 67-15 Capacity Building Activities...... 390 2 0.50 390.00
Part I, 160-178 Strategic Plan Development...... 390 2 0.50 390.00
Part I, 179-184 Intervention Implementation..... 390 2 0.17 132.60
Part I, 198-216 Systems and Contextual Factors 390 2 1.00 780.00
and Closing Questions..........................
Part II 1-40; 45 Intervention Specific 390 3 1.00 1,170.00
Information and Adaptations....................
Part II 41-44 Intervention Outcomes............. 390 6 0.17 397.80
Part II subforms Intervention Component 390 6 1.00 2,340.00
Information....................................
Review of past responses........................ 390 2 0.50 390.00
Preparation and gathering of supporting 390 2 2.00 1,560.00
materials......................................
State Review of Community Responses............. 26 2 1.00 52.00
Total Year 2 Burden--State-level............ 26 .............. .............. 52.00
---------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 25597]]
Total Year 2 Burden--Community-level........ 390 .............. .............. 7,683
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year 3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part I, 27-33 Cultural Competence, 390 2 0.17 132.60
Sustainability, and Framework Progress.........
Part I, 67-159 Capacity Building Activities..... 390 2 0.50 390.00
Part I, 179-184 Intervention Implementation..... 390 2 0.17 132.60
Part I, 185-197 Monitoring and Evaluation....... 390 2 0.33 257.40
Part I, 198-216 Systems and Contextual Factors 390 2 1.00 780.00
and Closing Questions..........................
Part II 1-40; 45 Intervention Specific 390 3 1.00 1,170.00
Information and Adaptations....................
Part II 41-44 Intervention Outcomes............. 390 6 0.17 397.80
Part II subforms Intervention Component 390 6 1.00 2,340.00
Information....................................
Review of past responses........................ 390 2 0.50 390.00
Preparation and gathering of supporting 390 2 2.00 1,560.00
materials......................................
State Review of Community Responses............. 26 2 1.00 52.00
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total Year 3 Burden--State-level............ 26 .............. .............. 52.00
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total Year 3 Burden--Community-level........ 390 .............. .............. 7,550.00
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total Average Annual Burden--Slate-level.... 26 .............. .............. 53.00
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total Average Annual Burden--Community-level 390 .............. .............. 6,855.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed
information collection should be sent by May 31, 2006 to: SAMHSA Desk
Officer, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management and
Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC
20503; due to potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing of mail
sent through the U.S. Postal Service, respondents are encouraged to
submit comments by fax to: 202-395-6974.
Dated: April 24, 2006.
Anna Marsh,
Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. E6-6493 Filed 4-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
