Sulfanilic Acid From China and India, 24860-24861 [E6-6309]

Download as PDF 24860 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 81 / Thursday, April 27, 2006 / Notices discussions. Therefore, members of the public interested in a particular agenda item or discussion should schedule their arrival accordingly. Written comments may be filed in advance of the meeting for the California Desert District Advisory Council, c/o Bureau of Land Management, Public Affairs Office, 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos, Moreno Valley, California 92553. Written comments also are accepted at the time of the meeting and, if copies are provided to the recorder, will be incorporated into the minutes. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doran Sanchez, BLM California Desert District External Affairs, (951) 697– 5220. Dated: April 18, 2006. Steven J. Borchard, District Manager. [FR Doc. E6–6337 Filed 4–26–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–40–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Minerals Management Service Royalty Policy Committee—Notice of Renewal Minerals Management Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of renewal of the Royalty Policy Committee. AGENCY: Following consultation with the General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior is renewing the Royalty Policy Committee. The Royalty Policy Committee will provide advice related to the performance of discretionary functions under the laws governing the Department of the Interior’s management of Federal and Indian mineral leases and revenues. The Committee will review and comment on revenue management and other mineralrelated policies and provide a forum to convey views representative of mineral lessees, operators, revenue payors, revenue recipients, governmental agencies, and the interested public. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gina Dan, Minerals Management Service, Minerals Revenue Management, Denver, Colorado 80225–0165, telephone (303) 231–3392. rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES SUMMARY: Certification I hereby certify that the Royalty Policy Committee is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the Department of the Interior by 43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq., 30 VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:13 Apr 26, 2006 Jkt 208001 U.S.C. 1701 et seq., and 30 U.S.C. 1001 et seq. Dated: April 13, 2006. P. Lynn Scarlett, Acting Secretary of the Interior. [FR Doc. E6–6339 Filed 4–26–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. Nos. 731–TA–846–850 (Review)] Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe From the Czech Republic, Japan, Mexico, Romania, and South Africa Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on small diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe from Japan and Romania 2 and large diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission also determines that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on small diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe from the Czech Republic and South Africa 3 and large diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe from Mexico 4 would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted these reviews on May 2, 2005 (70 FR 22688) and determined on August 5, 2005 that it would conduct full reviews (70 FR 49680, August 24, 2005). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 Vice Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun and Commissioners Jennifer A. Hillman and Daniel R. Pearson dissenting with regard to imports from Romania. 3 Chairman Stephen Koplan and Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane dissenting. 4 Chairman Stephen Koplan and Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane dissenting. PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on September 23, 2005 (70 FR 55917).5 The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on March 2, 2006, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to the Secretary of Commerce on April 26, 2006. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3850 (April 2006), entitled Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from the Czech Republic, Japan, Mexico, Romania, and South Africa: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–846–850 (Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: April 24, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–6362 Filed 4–26–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–318 and 731– TA–538 and 561 (Second Review)] Sulfanilic Acid From China and India Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on sulfanilic acid from India and the antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic acid from China and India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted these reviews on May 2, 2005 (70 FR 22698) and determined on August 5, 2005 that it would conduct full reviews (70 FR 48588, August 18, 2005). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of a public hearing to be held in 5 The Commission revised its schedule effective February 10, 2006 (71 FR 8311, February 16, 2006). 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM 27APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 81 / Thursday, April 27, 2006 / Notices connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on September 20, 2005 (70 FR 55165). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on January 26, 2006, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to the Secretary of Commerce on April 21, 2006. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3849 (April 2006), entitled Sulfanilic Acid from China and India: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–318 and 731–TA–538 and 561 (Second Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: April 21, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–6309 Filed 4–26–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested 60-day notice of information collection under review: Transactions Among Licensee/Permittees and Transactions Among Licensees and Holders of User Permits. rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES ACTION: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), has submitted the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for ‘‘sixty days’’ until June 26, 2006. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Sheila R. Hall, Explosives Industry Programs Branch, Room 5000, 650 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20226. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:13 Apr 26, 2006 Jkt 208001 Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. (1) Type of Information Collection: Extension of a currently approved collection. (2) Title of the Form/Collection: Transactions Among Licensee/Permitees and Transactions Among Licensees and Holders of User Permits. (3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department of Justice sponsoring the collection: Form Number: None. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: Business or other forprofit. Other: None. The Safe Explosives Act requires an explosives distributor must verify the identity of the purchaser; an explosives purchaser must provide a copy of the license/ permit to distributor prior to the purchase of explosive materials; possessors of explosive materials must provide a list of explosives storage locations; purchasers of explosive materials must provide a list of representatives authorized to purchase on behalf of the distributor; and an explosives purchaser must provide a statement of intended use for the explosives. (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: It is estimated that 50,000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 respondents will take 30 minutes to comply with the required information. (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: There are an estimated 25,000 annual total burden hours associated with this collection. If additional information is required, contact: Robert B. Briggs, Department Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, Department of Justice, Patrick Henry Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530. Robert B. Briggs, Department Clearance Officer, Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 06–3955 Filed 4–26–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–FY–M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested 60-day notice of information collection under review: Limited Permittee Transaction Record. ACTION: Overview of This Information Collection PO 00000 24861 The Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), has submitted the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for ‘‘sixty days’’ until June 26, 2006. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have comments, especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Sheila Hall, Explosives Industry Programs Branch, Room 5000, 650 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20226. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM 27APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24860-24861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-6309]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-318 and 731-TA-538 and 561 (Second Review)]


Sulfanilic Acid From China and India

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (``the Act''), that revocation of the 
countervailing duty order on sulfanilic acid from India and the 
antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic acid from China and India would 
be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to 
an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on May 2, 2005 (70 FR 
22698) and determined on August 5, 2005 that it would conduct full 
reviews (70 FR 48588, August 18, 2005). Notice of the scheduling of the 
Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in

[[Page 24861]]

connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on 
September 20, 2005 (70 FR 55165). The hearing was held in Washington, 
DC, on January 26, 2006, and all persons who requested the opportunity 
were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to 
the Secretary of Commerce on April 21, 2006. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3849 (April 2006), 
entitled Sulfanilic Acid from China and India: Investigation Nos. 701-
TA-318 and 731-TA-538 and 561 (Second Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: April 21, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E6-6309 Filed 4-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.