Classic Print Products, Inc., Burlington, NC; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration, 21041-21042 [E6-6093]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 78 / Monday, April 24, 2006 / Notices
Issued: April 18, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–6079 Filed 4–21–06; 8:45 am]
final release of information on June 6,
2006; and final party comments are due
on June 8, 2006.
For further information concerning
this review see the Commission’s notice
cited above and the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, part 201,
subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201),
and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19
CFR part 207).
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–860 (Review)]
Tin- and Chromium-Coated Steel Sheet
from Japan
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Revised schedule for the subject
review.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Effective Date: April 17, 2006.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
1 Correspondence of April 7, 2006, from Willkie
Farr & Gallagher LLP.
14:56 Apr 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
Issued: April 17, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–6028 Filed 4–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Olympia Hand (202–205–3182) or
Douglas Corkran (202–205–3057), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective
December 2, 2005, the Commission
established a schedule for the conduct
of the subject full review (70 FR 73027,
December 8, 2005). Subsequently,
counsel on behalf of the Japanese
respondents requested that the
Commission postpone its deadline for
the filing of posthearing briefs by two
days, citing communication difficulties
arising from multiple national holidays
in Japan during the period between the
Commission’s hearing and the due date
for posthearing briefs.1 No party to the
review objected to the requested
postponement. The Commission,
therefore, is revising its schedule to
incorporate this and related changes to
the schedule of the review.
The Commission’s new schedule for
the review is as follows: the deadline for
filing posthearing briefs is May 10,
2006; the Commission will make its
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[USITC SE–06–027]
Sunshine Act Meeting
United
States International Trade Commission.
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:
TIME AND DATE:
April 26, 2006 at 3 p.m.
Room 101, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, Telephone:
(202) 205–2000.
PLACE:
STATUS:
Open to the public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
2. Minutes.
3. Ratification List.
4. Inv. No. 731–TA–1091 (Final)
(Artists’ Canvas from China)—briefing
and vote. (The Commission is currently
scheduled to transmit its determination
and Commissioners’ opinions to the
Secretary of Commerce on or before May
8, 2006.)
5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
In accordance with Commission
policy, subject matter listed above, not
disposed of at the scheduled meeting,
may be carried over to the agenda of the
following meeting.
Issued: April 19, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06–3904 Filed 4–21–06; 9:12 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–U
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21041
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,663]
Classic Print Products, Inc.,
Burlington, NC; Notice of Revised
Determination on Reconsideration
By letter dated March 15, 2006, a
company official requested
administrative reconsideration
regarding the Department’s Negative
Determination Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance, applicable to the workers of
the subject firm. On April 12, 2006, a
Notice of Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration was issued, stating that
the application did not contain new
information supporting a conclusion
that the determination was erroneous
and did not provide a justification for
reconsideration of the determination
that was based on either mistaken facts
or a misinterpretation of facts or of the
law.
The petition, filed on behalf of
workers at the subject firm producing
sublimated printed paper, asserted that
production of sublimated printed paper
had shifted abroad. The denial, issued
on March 1, 2006, was based on the
findings that neither the subject firm nor
surveyed customers imported
sublimation printed paper during the
relevant period and that the subject firm
did not shift production abroad during
the investigation period. The
Department’s Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register
on March 24, 2006 (70 FR 14954).
Upon receipt of new information by
the company official regarding the
article produced at the subject firm, the
Department conducted an investigation
to determine whether the subject worker
group is eligible to apply for worker
adjustment assistance as provided by
the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
The new information indicated that
the subject firm used sublimated printed
paper as a medium to transfer ink
graphics onto substrates. The substrates
were then incorporated into the
customer’s final products (water boards
and snow boards).
The investigation revealed that the
subject firm supplied component parts
(substrates) and a loss of business with
a manufacturer of water boards and
snow boards whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for adjustment
assistance contributed importantly to
the separation or threat of separation of
workers at Classic Print Products, Inc.,
Burlington, North Carolina.
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
21042
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 78 / Monday, April 24, 2006 / Notices
In accordance with section 246 the
Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as
amended, the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of its
investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for
older workers.
In order for the Department to issue
a certification of eligibility to apply for
ATAA, the group eligibility
requirements of Section 246 of the
Trade Act must be met. The Department
has determined in this case that the
requirements of section 246 have been
met.
A significant number of workers at the
firm are age 50 or over and possess
skills that are not easily transferable.
Competitive conditions within the
industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
information obtained in the
reconsideration investigation, I
determine that workers of Classic Print
Products, Inc., Burlington, North
Carolina qualify as adversely affected
secondary workers under section 222 of
the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. In
accordance with the provisions of the
Act, I make the following certification:
All workers of Classic Print Products, Inc.,
Burlington, North Carolina, who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after January 17, 2005
through two years from the date of this
certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of
the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to
apply for alternative trade adjustment
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act
of 1974.
Signed in Washington, DC this 17th day of
April 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–6093 Filed 4–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,153]
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
IBM Corporation; Somers, NY; Notice
of Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on
September 22, 2003, in response to a
petition filed on behalf of workers at
IBM Corporation, Somers, New York.
The petition regarding the
investigation has been deemed invalid.
14:56 Apr 21, 2006
Signed at Washington, DC this 7th day of
April 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–6098 Filed 4–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Jkt 208001
The petitioner stated in the request for
reconsideration that the worker group
supported the production of
components (ink and printer cartridges)
of articles produced by the subject firm
(printers). The petitioner also inferred
that support activities were shifted
overseas when production shifted
abroad.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and has determined that the Department
will conduct further investigation based
on new information provided by the
petitioner and the company official.
Conclusion
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,163]
Lending Textile Company Inc.,
Williamsport, PA; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on April 5,
2006 in response to a petition filed by
a company official on behalf of workers
at Lending Textile Company Inc.,
Williamsport, Pennsylvania.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC this 10th day of
April, 2006.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–6100 Filed 4–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. The application
is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of
April 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–6094 Filed 4–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,019]
McCormick International USA, Inc.,
Pella, IA; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,808]
Lexmark International, Inc, Supply
Chain Workforce, Printing Solutions &
Services Division, Lexington, KY;
Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
VerDate Aug<31>2005
In order to establish a valid petition,
there must be at least three workers to
sign the petition. The petition in this
case did not meet this threshold
number. Consequently, the investigation
has been terminated.
By application of March 25, 2006, a
petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance, applicable to workers of the
subject firm. The Department’s notice of
determination was signed on February
24, 2006, and published in the Federal
Register on March 22, 2006 (71 FR
14550).
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on March 14,
2006 in response to a petition filed by
a Texas Workforce Commission
representative on behalf of workers of
McCormick International USA, Inc.,
Pella, Iowa.
The petition has been deem invalid. A
state agency representative cannot file a
TAA petition on behalf of workers of a
firm located in another state.
Consequently, further investigation
would serve no purpose, and the
investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 11th day of
April 2006.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–6097 Filed 4–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 78 (Monday, April 24, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21041-21042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-6093]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-58,663]
Classic Print Products, Inc., Burlington, NC; Notice of Revised
Determination on Reconsideration
By letter dated March 15, 2006, a company official requested
administrative reconsideration regarding the Department's Negative
Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance, applicable to the workers of the subject firm. On April 12,
2006, a Notice of Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration was
issued, stating that the application did not contain new information
supporting a conclusion that the determination was erroneous and did
not provide a justification for reconsideration of the determination
that was based on either mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of facts
or of the law.
The petition, filed on behalf of workers at the subject firm
producing sublimated printed paper, asserted that production of
sublimated printed paper had shifted abroad. The denial, issued on
March 1, 2006, was based on the findings that neither the subject firm
nor surveyed customers imported sublimation printed paper during the
relevant period and that the subject firm did not shift production
abroad during the investigation period. The Department's Notice of
determination was published in the Federal Register on March 24, 2006
(70 FR 14954).
Upon receipt of new information by the company official regarding
the article produced at the subject firm, the Department conducted an
investigation to determine whether the subject worker group is eligible
to apply for worker adjustment assistance as provided by the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
The new information indicated that the subject firm used sublimated
printed paper as a medium to transfer ink graphics onto substrates. The
substrates were then incorporated into the customer's final products
(water boards and snow boards).
The investigation revealed that the subject firm supplied component
parts (substrates) and a loss of business with a manufacturer of water
boards and snow boards whose workers were certified eligible to apply
for adjustment assistance contributed importantly to the separation or
threat of separation of workers at Classic Print Products, Inc.,
Burlington, North Carolina.
[[Page 21042]]
In accordance with section 246 the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C.
2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein presents the results
of its investigation regarding certification of eligibility to apply
for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of eligibility
to apply for ATAA, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246 of
the Trade Act must be met. The Department has determined in this case
that the requirements of section 246 have been met.
A significant number of workers at the firm are age 50 or over and
possess skills that are not easily transferable. Competitive conditions
within the industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the information obtained in the
reconsideration investigation, I determine that workers of Classic
Print Products, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina qualify as adversely
affected secondary workers under section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974,
as amended. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the
following certification:
All workers of Classic Print Products, Inc., Burlington, North
Carolina, who became totally or partially separated from employment
on or after January 17, 2005 through two years from the date of this
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the
Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, DC this 17th day of April 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6-6093 Filed 4-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P