In the Matter of Certain Digital Processors and Digital Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 21040-21041 [E6-6079]
Download as PDF
21040
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 78 / Monday, April 24, 2006 / Notices
Dated: March 3, 2006.
Gail Acheson,
Field Manager, Palm Springs-South Coast
Field Office, Bureau of Land Management.
Dated: March 3, 2006.
Laurie Rosenthal,
District Ranger, San Jacinto Ranger District,
San Bernardino National Forest, USDA Forest
Service.
Dated: March 3, 2006.
James Foote,
Acting Monument Manager, Santa Rosa and
San Jacinto Mountains, National Monument.
[FR Doc. 06–3844 Filed 4–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–40–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[OR 110 5882 PH MJ99; HAG06–0104]
Authority: 43 CFR subpart 1784/Advisory
Committees.
Timothy R. Reuwsaat,
District Manager, Medford.
[FR Doc. E6–6060 Filed 4–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–33–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–559]
In the Matter of Certain Digital
Processors and Digital Processing
Systems, Components Thereof, and
Products Containing Same; Notice of
Commission Decision Not To Review
an Initial Determination Granting
Complainant’s Motion To Amend the
Complaint and Notice of Investigation
AGENCY:
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land
Management Medford District Resource
Advisory Committee will meet in
Medford, Oregon to tour project sites
and to discuss proposed 2007 projects,
pursuant to Public Law 106–393.
Agenda topics include on-site
inspections of previous projects and
proposed 2007 projects, review of last
meeting minutes, presentations on
proposed fiscal year 2007 Title II
projects, and discussion regarding
proposed projects.
DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for meeting dates.
ADDRESSES: The field trips will start
from, and the meetings will be held at,
the Bureau of Land Management
Medford District Office, located at 3040
Biddle Road, Medford, Oregon.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bureau of Land Management, Medford
District, Patty Burel at (541–618–2424),
e-mail: patricia_burel@blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The field trip dates are:
1. June 15, 2006, 7 a.m. to 4 p.m.
2. June 22, 2006, 7 a.m. to 4 p.m.
The meeting dates are:
1. July 13, 2006, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.
2. July 20, 2006, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.
A public comment period will be held
from 2:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. on July 13
and July 20, 2006.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
issued by the presiding administrative
law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting
complainant’s motion to amend the
complaint and notice of investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Walters, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5468. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
investigation was instituted on January
9, 2006, based on a complaint filed by
Biax Corporation (‘‘Biax’’) of Boulder,
Colorado. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
AGENCY:
Notice of Meetings
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Medford District, Bureau of
Land Management, Department of the
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Bureau of Land
Management, Medford District
Resource. Advisory Committee meeting
as identified in section 205(f)(2) of the
Secure Rural Schools and Community
Self-Determination Act of 2000, Public
Law 106–393.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:56 Apr 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
certain digital processors or digital
processing systems, components
thereof, or products containing the same
by reason of infringement of various
claims of United States Patent Nos.
5,021,945, 5,517,628, and 6,253,313.
The complaint originally named four
respondents: Philips Semiconductors
B.V. of the Netherlands; Philips
Consumer Electronics Services B.V. of
the Netherlands; Philips Consumer
Electronics North America Corp. of
Atlanta, Georgia; and 2Wire, Inc. of San
Jose, California. Biax previously
amended the complaint and notice of
investigation in order to remove
respondent Philips Consumer
Electronics North America Corp. and to
add Philips Electronics North America
Corp. 71 FR 17136 (April 5, 2006).
On March 9, 2006, Biax moved to
amend the complaint and notice of
investigation in order to remove
respondent Philips Consumer
Electronics Services B.V. and to add
Philips Semiconductors, Inc. of San
Jose, California, and Philips Consumer
Electronics B.V. of the Netherlands.
Biax stated that it had recently learned
that Philips Consumer Electronics
Services B.V. is a dormant entity that
has not imported into the United States,
sold, or offered for sale any of the
accused products. In addition, Biax
stated that it had recently learned that
Philips Semiconductors, Inc. imports
and sells the accused products in the
United States and that Philips
Consumer Electronics B.V.
manufactures consumer products that
contain the accused products and sells
them in the United States. None of the
current respondents nor the
Commission investigative attorney
opposed Biax’s motion.
On March 27, 2006, the ALJ issued an
ID granting Biax’s motion to amend the
complaint and notice of investigation.
The ALJ found that, pursuant to
Commission Rule 210.14(b)(1) (19 CFR
210.14(b)(1)), there was good cause to
amend the complaint and notice of
investigation in order to remove
respondent Philips Consumer
Electronics Services B.V. and to add
Philips Semiconductors, Inc. and
Philips Consumer Electronics B.V. No
petitions for review of the ID were filed.
Having examined the record of this
investigation, the Commission has
determined not to review the ALJ’s ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.42 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42).
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 78 / Monday, April 24, 2006 / Notices
Issued: April 18, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–6079 Filed 4–21–06; 8:45 am]
final release of information on June 6,
2006; and final party comments are due
on June 8, 2006.
For further information concerning
this review see the Commission’s notice
cited above and the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, part 201,
subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201),
and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19
CFR part 207).
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–860 (Review)]
Tin- and Chromium-Coated Steel Sheet
from Japan
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Revised schedule for the subject
review.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Effective Date: April 17, 2006.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
1 Correspondence of April 7, 2006, from Willkie
Farr & Gallagher LLP.
14:56 Apr 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
Issued: April 17, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–6028 Filed 4–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Olympia Hand (202–205–3182) or
Douglas Corkran (202–205–3057), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective
December 2, 2005, the Commission
established a schedule for the conduct
of the subject full review (70 FR 73027,
December 8, 2005). Subsequently,
counsel on behalf of the Japanese
respondents requested that the
Commission postpone its deadline for
the filing of posthearing briefs by two
days, citing communication difficulties
arising from multiple national holidays
in Japan during the period between the
Commission’s hearing and the due date
for posthearing briefs.1 No party to the
review objected to the requested
postponement. The Commission,
therefore, is revising its schedule to
incorporate this and related changes to
the schedule of the review.
The Commission’s new schedule for
the review is as follows: the deadline for
filing posthearing briefs is May 10,
2006; the Commission will make its
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[USITC SE–06–027]
Sunshine Act Meeting
United
States International Trade Commission.
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:
TIME AND DATE:
April 26, 2006 at 3 p.m.
Room 101, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, Telephone:
(202) 205–2000.
PLACE:
STATUS:
Open to the public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
2. Minutes.
3. Ratification List.
4. Inv. No. 731–TA–1091 (Final)
(Artists’ Canvas from China)—briefing
and vote. (The Commission is currently
scheduled to transmit its determination
and Commissioners’ opinions to the
Secretary of Commerce on or before May
8, 2006.)
5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
In accordance with Commission
policy, subject matter listed above, not
disposed of at the scheduled meeting,
may be carried over to the agenda of the
following meeting.
Issued: April 19, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06–3904 Filed 4–21–06; 9:12 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–U
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21041
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,663]
Classic Print Products, Inc.,
Burlington, NC; Notice of Revised
Determination on Reconsideration
By letter dated March 15, 2006, a
company official requested
administrative reconsideration
regarding the Department’s Negative
Determination Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance, applicable to the workers of
the subject firm. On April 12, 2006, a
Notice of Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration was issued, stating that
the application did not contain new
information supporting a conclusion
that the determination was erroneous
and did not provide a justification for
reconsideration of the determination
that was based on either mistaken facts
or a misinterpretation of facts or of the
law.
The petition, filed on behalf of
workers at the subject firm producing
sublimated printed paper, asserted that
production of sublimated printed paper
had shifted abroad. The denial, issued
on March 1, 2006, was based on the
findings that neither the subject firm nor
surveyed customers imported
sublimation printed paper during the
relevant period and that the subject firm
did not shift production abroad during
the investigation period. The
Department’s Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register
on March 24, 2006 (70 FR 14954).
Upon receipt of new information by
the company official regarding the
article produced at the subject firm, the
Department conducted an investigation
to determine whether the subject worker
group is eligible to apply for worker
adjustment assistance as provided by
the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
The new information indicated that
the subject firm used sublimated printed
paper as a medium to transfer ink
graphics onto substrates. The substrates
were then incorporated into the
customer’s final products (water boards
and snow boards).
The investigation revealed that the
subject firm supplied component parts
(substrates) and a loss of business with
a manufacturer of water boards and
snow boards whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for adjustment
assistance contributed importantly to
the separation or threat of separation of
workers at Classic Print Products, Inc.,
Burlington, North Carolina.
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 78 (Monday, April 24, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21040-21041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-6079]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-559]
In the Matter of Certain Digital Processors and Digital
Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same;
Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination
Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'')
granting complainant's motion to amend the complaint and notice of
investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Walters, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted on January
9, 2006, based on a complaint filed by Biax Corporation (``Biax'') of
Boulder, Colorado. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United
States after importation of certain digital processors or digital
processing systems, components thereof, or products containing the same
by reason of infringement of various claims of United States Patent
Nos. 5,021,945, 5,517,628, and 6,253,313. The complaint originally
named four respondents: Philips Semiconductors B.V. of the Netherlands;
Philips Consumer Electronics Services B.V. of the Netherlands; Philips
Consumer Electronics North America Corp. of Atlanta, Georgia; and
2Wire, Inc. of San Jose, California. Biax previously amended the
complaint and notice of investigation in order to remove respondent
Philips Consumer Electronics North America Corp. and to add Philips
Electronics North America Corp. 71 FR 17136 (April 5, 2006).
On March 9, 2006, Biax moved to amend the complaint and notice of
investigation in order to remove respondent Philips Consumer
Electronics Services B.V. and to add Philips Semiconductors, Inc. of
San Jose, California, and Philips Consumer Electronics B.V. of the
Netherlands. Biax stated that it had recently learned that Philips
Consumer Electronics Services B.V. is a dormant entity that has not
imported into the United States, sold, or offered for sale any of the
accused products. In addition, Biax stated that it had recently learned
that Philips Semiconductors, Inc. imports and sells the accused
products in the United States and that Philips Consumer Electronics
B.V. manufactures consumer products that contain the accused products
and sells them in the United States. None of the current respondents
nor the Commission investigative attorney opposed Biax's motion.
On March 27, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID granting Biax's motion to
amend the complaint and notice of investigation. The ALJ found that,
pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.14(b)(1)), there
was good cause to amend the complaint and notice of investigation in
order to remove respondent Philips Consumer Electronics Services B.V.
and to add Philips Semiconductors, Inc. and Philips Consumer
Electronics B.V. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. Having
examined the record of this investigation, the Commission has
determined not to review the ALJ's ID.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure
(19 CFR 210.42).
[[Page 21041]]
Issued: April 18, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-6079 Filed 4-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P