Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinker from Mexico, 19749-19750 [E6-5660]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 73 / Monday, April 17, 2006 / Notices Williamsburg Independent City Merchants Square and Resort Historic District, Boundary St., Duke of Gloucester St., S. England St., Francis St., Henry St. Prince George St., Williamsburg (Independent City), 06000365 WASHINGTON King County Medical Dental Building, 509 Olive Way, Seattle, 06000371 Seattle Yacht Club—Main Station, 1807 Hamlin St., Seattle, 06000370 A request for REMOVAL has been received for the following resources: IOWA Harrison County Harrison County Jail 105 S. 1st Ave. Logan, 83004517 MARYLAND Charles County Johnsontown Fairgrounds Rd. E of Penn Central RR Tracks La Plata vicinity, 91000610 The comment period has been WAIVED for the following resource: VIRGINIA Rockingham County Breneman—Turner Mill 5036 Turners Mill Ln., Harrisonburg, 06000325 [FR Doc. E6–5673 Filed 4–14–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–51–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Reclamation Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Renewal Bureau of Reclamation, Interior. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces that the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) is seeking a renewal of the following information collection: Diversions, Return Flow, and Consumptive Use of Colorado River Water in the Lower Colorado River Basin, OMB No. 1006–0015. Before submitting the information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget for approval, Reclamation is soliciting comments on specific aspects of the information collection. DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by June 16, 2006. ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this notice to Amber VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:16 Apr 14, 2006 Jkt 208001 Cunningham, BCOO–4452, Bureau of Reclamation, P.O. Box 61470, Boulder City, Nevada 89006–1470. A copy of the information collection form can be obtained by writing to the above address or calling Amber Cunningham at 702– 293–8472. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amber Cunningham, Economist, 702– 294–8472. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of Reclamation’s functions, including whether the information will have practical use; (b) the accuracy of Reclamation’s estimated time and cost burdens of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, use, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Our practice is to make comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public review. Individual respondents may request that we withhold their home address from public disclosure, which we will honor to the extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which we would withhold a respondent’s identity from public disclosure, as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comment. We will make all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, available for public disclosure in their entirety. Information on water diversions is reported on four different types of forms. The base form (Form 72) was developed for use by respondents in the State of Nevada and variations of the form have been used by other respondents. Some respondents choose to use their own format to report diversions and return flows. Water service contracts require some respondents to supply both monthly and annual reports on the same form. Title: Diversions, Return Flow, and Consumptive Use of Colorado River Water in the Lower Colorado River Basin. OMB No.: 1006–0015. Abstract: Reclamation delivers Colorado River water to water users for diversion and beneficial consumptive PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 19749 use in the States of Arizona, California, and Nevada. Under Supreme Court order, the United States is required, at least annually, to prepare and maintain complete, detailed, and accurate records of diversions of water, return flow, and consumptive use. This information is needed to ensure that a State or a water user within a State does not exceed its authorized use of Colorado River water. Water users are obligated to provide information on diversions and return flows to Reclamation by provisions in their water delivery contracts. Reclamation determines the consumptive use by subtracting return flow from diversions or by other engineering means. Without the information collected, Reclamation could not comply with the order of the United States Supreme Court to prepare and maintain detailed and accurate records of diversions, return flow, and consumptive use. Description of respondents: The Lower Basin States (Arizona, California, and Nevada), local and tribal entities, water districts, and individuals that use Colorado River water. Frequency: Annually, or otherwise as determined by the Secretary of the Interior. Estimated total number of respondents: 54. Estimated hours per form: LC–72: 54 hours. LC72A: 30 hours. LC72B: 78 hours. Custom forms: 128 hours. Estimated total burden hours: 290. Dated: March 24, 2006. Terrence J. Fulp, Area Manager, Boulder Canyon Operations Office, Lower Colorado Region. [FR Doc. E6–5639 Filed 4–14–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–451 (Second Review)] Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinker from Mexico United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of postponement of establishing a schedule for a full fiveyear review concerning the antidumping duty order on gray portland cement and cement clinker from Mexico. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has postponed establishing a schedule for a full review to determine whether revocation of the antidumping E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM 17APN1 dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES 19750 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 73 / Monday, April 17, 2006 / Notices duty order on gray portland cement and cement clinker from Mexico would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further information concerning the rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). EFFECTIVE DATE: April 17, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim McClure (202–205–3191), Office of Investigations or Robin L. Turner (202– 205–3103), Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 3, 2005, the Commission instituted a five-year review concerning the antidumping duty order on gray portland cement and cement clinker from Mexico (70 F.R. 57617). On January 6, 2006, the Commission determined that it should proceed to a full review in the subject five-year review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act (71 F.R. 2957, January 18, 2006). On March 6, 2006, the Office of the United States Trade Representative and the United States Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) entered into an agreement with the Secretaria de Economia of Mexico pertaining to imports of gray portland cement and clinker from Mexico (‘‘Agreement’’). The Agreement provides that, if Mexican Cement producers successfully abide by the terms of the Agreement for three years, the antidumping duty order will be revoked with respect to those producers. Pursuant to Section II.A.4.d. of the Mexican Cement Agreement, Commerce has ‘‘[s]uspended the 2005 Sunset Review of the Mexican Cement Order.’’ 1 Thus, Commerce has not 1 Section I.V. of the Agreement defines ‘‘2005 Sunset Review’’ as ‘‘the five year review of the Mexican Cement Order under 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) initiated by DOC on October 3, 2005.’’ VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:16 Apr 14, 2006 Jkt 208001 issued a schedule for conducting its 2005 Sunset Review, including setting a date when it intends to issue the final determination for its review. Accordingly, the Commission has postponed establishing a schedule in its related full five-year review until such time as Commerce issues a schedule or announces a final affirmative determination in its 2005 Sunset Review. Authority: This notice is published pursuant to § 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Issued: April 12, 2006. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–5660 Filed 4–14–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—AAF Association, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on March 27, 2006, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), AAF Association, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, i-Yuno Global, Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Joanneum Research, Graz, AUSTRIA; CANVASs Co., Ltd., Tokyo, JAPAN; and Virorum Consulting LLP, Brighton, Sussex, UNITED KINGDOM have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Siemens Business Services, San Francisco, CA has withdrawn as a party to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and AAF Association, Inc. intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership. On March 28, 2000, AAF Association, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 section 6(b) of the Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127). The last notification was filed with the Department on December 28, 2005. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on January 26, 2006 (71 FR 4378). Dorothy B. Fountain, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 06–3645 Filed 4–14–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Flexible Display Center at Arizona State University Notice is hereby given that, on March 24, 2006, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Flexible Display Center at Arizona State University (‘‘Center’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Rockwell Collins, Cedar Rapids, IA; Litrex, Pleasanton, CA; Nitto Denko, Osaka, JAPAN; and L3 Communications, Sylmar, CA have been added as parties to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Center intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership. On March 3, 2005, Center filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on March 25, 2005 (70 FR 15350). The last notification was filed with the Department on June 17, 2005. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on July 13, 2005 (70 FR 40399). Dorothy B. Fountain, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 06–3642 Filed 4–14–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–M E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM 17APN1

Agencies

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19749-19750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-5660]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-451 (Second Review)]


Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinker from Mexico

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice of postponement of establishing a schedule for a full 
five-year review concerning the antidumping duty order on gray portland 
cement and cement clinker from Mexico.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has postponed 
establishing a schedule for a full review to determine whether 
revocation of the antidumping

[[Page 19750]]

duty order on gray portland cement and cement clinker from Mexico would 
be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury 
within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further information 
concerning the rules of general application, consult the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR 
part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 17, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim McClure (202-205-3191), Office of 
Investigations or Robin L. Turner (202-205-3103), Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information 
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special 
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the 
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning 
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server 
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 3, 2005, the Commission 
instituted a five-year review concerning the antidumping duty order on 
gray portland cement and cement clinker from Mexico (70 F.R. 57617). On 
January 6, 2006, the Commission determined that it should proceed to a 
full review in the subject five-year review pursuant to section 
751(c)(5) of the Act (71 F.R. 2957, January 18, 2006).
    On March 6, 2006, the Office of the United States Trade 
Representative and the United States Department of Commerce 
(``Commerce'') entered into an agreement with the Secretaria de 
Economia of Mexico pertaining to imports of gray portland cement and 
clinker from Mexico (``Agreement''). The Agreement provides that, if 
Mexican Cement producers successfully abide by the terms of the 
Agreement for three years, the antidumping duty order will be revoked 
with respect to those producers. Pursuant to Section II.A.4.d. of the 
Mexican Cement Agreement, Commerce has ``[s]uspended the 2005 Sunset 
Review of the Mexican Cement Order.'' \1\ Thus, Commerce has not issued 
a schedule for conducting its 2005 Sunset Review, including setting a 
date when it intends to issue the final determination for its review. 
Accordingly, the Commission has postponed establishing a schedule in 
its related full five-year review until such time as Commerce issues a 
schedule or announces a final affirmative determination in its 2005 
Sunset Review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Section I.V. of the Agreement defines ``2005 Sunset Review'' 
as ``the five year review of the Mexican Cement Order under 19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)) initiated by DOC on October 3, 2005.''

    Authority: This notice is published pursuant to Sec.  207.62 of 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
the Commission's rules.

    Issued: April 12, 2006.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E6-5660 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.