Magnet Schools Assistance Program, 18728-18730 [E6-5438]
Download as PDF
18728
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Notices
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
On March 24, 2006 the Chairman of
CITA received a request from Biederlack
of America alleging that acrylic staple
fiber, not carded, combed or otherwise
processed for spinning, classified in
subheading 5503.30 of the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS), cannot be supplied by the
domestic industry in commercial
quantities in a timely manner and
requesting that CITA consider whether
the NAFTA rule of origin for blankets
classified under HTSUS subheading
6301.40 should be modified to allow the
use of non-North American acrylic
staple fiber. The petitioner requested
that the modification be effective for
entries made on or after January 24,
2006, the date they alleged production
of all acrylic fiber that meets their
specifications ended in North America.
CITA is soliciting public comments
regarding this request, particularly with
respect to whether acrylic staple fiber
can be supplied by the domestic
industry in commercial quantities in a
timely manner. Comments must be
received no later than May 12, 2006.
Interested persons are invited to submit
six copies of such comments or
information to the Chairman, Committee
for the Implementation of Textile
Agreements, room 3100, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230.
If a comment alleges that acrylic
staple fiber can be supplied by the
domestic industry in commercial
quantities in a timely manner, CITA will
closely review any supporting
documentation, such as a signed
statement by a manufacturer stating that
it produces fiber that is the subject of
the request, including the quantities that
can be supplied and the time necessary
to fill an order, as well as any relevant
information regarding past production.
CITA will protect any business
confidential information that is marked
business confidential from disclosure to
the full extent permitted by law. CITA
will make available to the public nonconfidential versions of the request and
non-confidential versions of any public
comments received with respect to a
request in room 3100 in the Herbert
Hoover Building, 14th and Constitution
Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230.
Persons submitting comments on a
request are encouraged to include a nonconfidential version and a nonconfidential summary.
James C. Leonard III,
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation
of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc.E6–5405 Filed 4–11–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests
Department of Education.
SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official,
Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management, invites
comments on the proposed information
collection requests as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
AGENCY:
Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before June 12,
2006.
DATES:
Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The IC Clearance
Official, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of
Management, publishes that notice
containing proposed information
collection requests prior to submission
of these requests to OMB. Each
proposed information collection,
grouped by office, contains the
following: (1) Type of review requested,
e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or
reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of
the collection; (4) Description of the
need for, and proposed use of, the
information; (5) Respondents and
frequency of collection; and (6)
Reporting and/or Recordkeeping
burden. OMB invites public comment.
The Department of Education is
especially interested in public comment
addressing the following issues: (1) Is
this collection necessary to the proper
functions of the Department; (2) will
this information be processed and used
in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate
of burden accurate; (4) how might the
Department enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (5) how might the
Department minimize the burden of this
collection on the respondents, including
through the use of information
technology.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:42 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: April 6, 2006.
Angela C. Arrington,
IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information
Management Services Office of Management.
Office of English Language Acquisition
Type of Review: Revision.
Title: Title III Biennial Report
Required of State Education Agencies
Regarding Activities Under the NCLB
Act of 2001.
Frequency: Biennially.
Affected Public: State, local, or tribal
gov’t, SEAs or LEAs.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:
Responses: 52.
Burden Hours: 156.
Abstract: State Directors of Title III of
the No Child Left Behind (Elementary
and Secondary Education) Act—
Language Instruction for Limited
English Proficient and Immigrant
Students—are required to transmit their
State Formula Grant Biennial Evaluation
Report to the Secretary of Education
every two years. The Department uses
the information collected for the
Secretary’s Biennial Report to Congress
and for the determination of State Title
III accountability.
Requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request may be
accessed from https://edicsweb.ed.gov,
by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending
Collections’’ link and by clicking on
link number 3024. When you access the
information collection, click on
‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view.
Written requests for information should
be addressed to U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Potomac Center, 9th Floor, Washington,
DC 20202–4700. Requests may also be
electronically mailed to
IC_DocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202–
245–6623. Please specify the complete
title of the information collection when
making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or
the collection activity requirements
should be electronically mailed to
IC_DocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
[FR Doc. E6–5352 Filed 4–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Magnet Schools Assistance Program
Office of Innovation and
Improvement, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priority.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Notices
SUMMARY: The Assistant Deputy
Secretary for Innovation and
Improvement proposes a priority under
the Magnet Schools Assistance Program
(MSAP). The Assistant Deputy Secretary
may use this priority for competitions in
fiscal year (FY) 2007 and in later years.
We intend this priority to encourage
eligible applicants to focus on
expanding their capacity to provide
public school choice by using magnet
schools to provide public school choice
options to parents whose children
attend schools that have been identified
for school improvement, corrective
action, or restructuring under Title I of
the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended
(ESEA).
We must receive your comments
on or before May 12, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about
this proposed priority to Steven L.
Brockhouse, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 4W229, Washington, DC 20202–
5970. If you prefer to send your
comments through the Internet, use the
following address:
steve.brockhouse@ed.gov.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven L. Brockhouse. Telephone: (202)
260–2476 or via Internet:
steve.brockhouse@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Invitation to Comment
We invite you to submit comments
regarding this proposed priority. To
ensure that your comments have
maximum effect in developing the
notice of final priority, we urge you to
identify clearly the element of the
proposed priority that each comment
addresses.
We invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866
and its overall requirement of reducing
regulatory burden that might result from
this proposed priority. Please let us
know of any further opportunities we
should take to reduce potential costs or
increase potential benefits while
preserving the effective and efficient
administration of the program.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:42 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about this proposed priority in room
4W229, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC, between the hours of
8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Eastern time,
Monday through Friday of each week
except Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record
On request, we will supply an
appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for this proposed priority. If you
want to schedule an appointment for
this type of aid, please contact the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
General Information
The MSAP provides grants to eligible
local educational agencies (LEAs) and
consortia of LEAs to support magnet
schools that are part of an approved
desegregation plan. For the purpose of
the MSAP, a magnet school is a public
elementary school, public secondary
school, public elementary education
center, or public secondary education
center that offers a special curriculum
capable of attracting substantial
numbers of students of different racial
backgrounds.
Through the implementation of
magnet schools, MSAP resources
support objectives and activities that
enable all elementary and secondary
students to achieve to high standards,
hold schools and LEAs accountable for
ensuring they do so, and help schools
and LEAs develop and design
innovative educational methods and
practices that support desegregation
efforts to eliminate, reduce, or prevent
minority group isolation and increase
choices in public elementary and
secondary schools.
Background on Proposed Priority
Consistent with the statutory purpose
of the MSAP, magnet schools are
designed to eliminate, reduce, or
prevent minority group isolation in
schools with substantial numbers or
percentages of minority group students,
bring students of different backgrounds
together, assist LEAs in achieving
systemic reforms, provide all students
the opportunity to meet challenging
State content standards and challenging
State performance standards, and
increase choices in public elementary
and secondary schools.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18729
The priority we are proposing,
Expanding Capacity to Provide Choice,
would provide eligible LEAs with an
opportunity to continue to use magnet
schools, consistent with their
desegregation plan objectives for the
elimination, reduction, or prevention of
minority group isolation, to expand
their capacity to provide public school
choice to parents whose children attend
schools identified for school
improvement, corrective action, or
restructuring.
The proposed priority would provide
eligible applicants the flexibility to use
either or both of two approaches to
expanding their capacity to provide
public school choice.
First, an eligible applicant could
convert one or more schools identified
for improvement, corrective action, or
restructuring under Title I to magnet
schools in order to improve the quality
of teaching and instruction in these
schools. Using this approach,
conversion of a school to a magnet
school would benefit students already
attending the school by offering a
magnet curriculum that would include
subject matter or teaching methodology
that is generally not available at other
schools in the LEA and would be more
challenging and innovative than the
curricular program that the school had
previously provided. The
implementation of the magnet
curriculum, along with resources such
as equipment, supplies and staff
development to support the
implementation of the magnet
curriculum, would also help the school
reduce, eliminate, or prevent minority
group isolation at the magnet school
and/or at the sending schools by
attracting other students, including
higher-achieving students of different
backgrounds, based on their interest in
a curricular program that would not be
available to them in the schools that
they would otherwise attend.
Second, an eligible applicant could
use higher-performing schools as
magnet schools and, by doing so,
significantly increase the opportunity
for students attending schools identified
for school improvement, corrective
action, or restructuring to participate in
public school choice by attending a
higher-performing school. Using this
approach, an eligible applicant would
need to ensure that the magnet school
would have sufficient space available to
accommodate students who would
likely be interested in transferring from
schools identified for school
improvement, corrective action, or
restructuring. Additionally, the LEA
would need to show how the enrollment
of the magnet and/or sending schools
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
18730
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Notices
(i.e., the schools identified for school
improvement, corrective action, or
restructuring from which students
would transfer) would change in a
manner that resulted in the elimination,
reduction, or prevention of minority
group isolation in those sending
schools.
Under either approach, an applicant
would be required to show how it
would effectively inform parents whose
children attend schools identified for
school improvement, corrective action,
or restructuring about the new choices
made available to them in the magnet
schools to be funded under the project.
We will announce the final priority in
a notice in the Federal Register. We will
determine the final priority after
considering responses to this notice and
other information available to the
Department. This notice does not
preclude us from proposing or funding
additional priorities, subject to meeting
applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use this proposed priority, we invite
applications through a notice in the Federal
Register. When inviting applications we
designate the priority as absolute,
competitive preference, or invitational. The
effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority we consider only applications that
meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a
competitive preference priority we give
competitive preference to an application by
either (1) awarding additional points,
depending on how well or the extent to
which the application meets the competitive
priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2)
selecting an application that meets the
competitive priority over an application of
comparable merit that does not meet the
priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational
priority we are particularly interested in
applications that meet the invitational
priority. However, we do not give an
application that meets the invitational
priority a competitive or absolute preference
over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Priority
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Expanding Capacity to Provide Choice
This proposed priority supports
applications that would—
(1) Help parents whose children
attend low-performing schools (that is,
schools that have been identified for
school improvement, corrective action,
or restructuring under Title I of the
Elementary and Secondary Education
Act of 1965, as amended) by—
(a) Selecting schools identified for
school improvement, corrective action,
or restructuring under Title I as magnet
schools to be funded under this project
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:42 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
and improving the quality of teaching
and instruction in these schools; or
(b) Maximizing the opportunity for
students in low-performing schools to
attend higher-performing magnet
schools funded under the project and
thereby reduce minority group isolation
in the low-performing sending schools;
and
(2) Effectively inform parents whose
children attend low-performing schools
about choices that are available to them
in the magnet schools to be funded
under the project.
Note: For the purpose of selecting
applications under this priority, school
improvement has the meaning given in 34
CFR 200.32(a)(1), corrective action has the
meaning given in 34 CFR 200.33(a), and
restructuring has the meaning given in 34
CFR 200.34(a).
Executive Order 12866
This notice of proposed priority has
been reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866. Under the terms
of the order, we have assessed the
potential costs and benefits of this
regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with
the notice of proposed priority are those
resulting from statutory requirements
and those we have determined as
necessary for administering this
program effectively and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this notice of proposed
priority, we have determined that the
benefits of the proposed priority justify
the costs.
We have also determined that this
regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
Summary of potential costs and
benefits: The potential cost associated
with this proposed priority is minimal
while the benefits are significant.
The benefit of the proposed priority is
that it will help applicants prepare highquality proposals that expand their
capacity to provide public school choice
to parents whose children attend
schools that have not made adequate
yearly progress.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the
Executive order is to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism. The Executive
order relies on processes developed by
State and local governments for
coordination and review of proposed
Federal financial assistance.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
This document provides early
notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Applicable Program Regulations: 34
CFR part 280.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may review this document, as
well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the
Federal Register, in text or Adobe
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the
Internet at the following site: https://
www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll-free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
You may also view this document in
text at the following site: https://
www.ed.gov/programs/magnet/
applicant.html.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index/html.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 84.165A Magnet Schools Assistance
Program)
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7231–7231j.
Dated: April 7, 2006.
Christopher J. Doherty,
Acting Assistant Deputy Secretary for
Innovation and Improvement.
[FR Doc. E6–5438 Filed 4–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[OE Docket No. EA–297–A]
Application To Export Electric Energy;
SESCO Enterprises Canada
Office of Electricity Delivery
and Energy Reliability, DOE.
ACTION: Notice of Application.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: SESCO Enterprises Canada
(SESCO Canada) has applied to renew
its authority to transmit electric energy
from the United States to Canada
pursuant to section 202(e) of the Federal
Power Act.
DATES: Comments, protests or requests
to intervene must be submitted on or
before May 12, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments, protests or
requests to intervene should be
addressed as follows: Office of
Electricity Delivery and Energy
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18728-18730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-5438]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Magnet Schools Assistance Program
AGENCY: Office of Innovation and Improvement, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priority.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 18729]]
SUMMARY: The Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement
proposes a priority under the Magnet Schools Assistance Program (MSAP).
The Assistant Deputy Secretary may use this priority for competitions
in fiscal year (FY) 2007 and in later years. We intend this priority to
encourage eligible applicants to focus on expanding their capacity to
provide public school choice by using magnet schools to provide public
school choice options to parents whose children attend schools that
have been identified for school improvement, corrective action, or
restructuring under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education
Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA).
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before May 12, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about this proposed priority to Steven
L. Brockhouse, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 4W229, Washington, DC 20202-5970. If you prefer to send your
comments through the Internet, use the following address:
steve.brockhouse@ed.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven L. Brockhouse. Telephone: (202)
260-2476 or via Internet: steve.brockhouse@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may
call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation to Comment
We invite you to submit comments regarding this proposed priority.
To ensure that your comments have maximum effect in developing the
notice of final priority, we urge you to identify clearly the element
of the proposed priority that each comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of
reducing regulatory burden that might result from this proposed
priority. Please let us know of any further opportunities we should
take to reduce potential costs or increase potential benefits while
preserving the effective and efficient administration of the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about this proposed priority in room 4W229, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Eastern time, Monday through Friday of each week except Federal
holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities in Reviewing the Rulemaking
Record
On request, we will supply an appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a disability who needs
assistance to review the comments or other documents in the public
rulemaking record for this proposed priority. If you want to schedule
an appointment for this type of aid, please contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
General Information
The MSAP provides grants to eligible local educational agencies
(LEAs) and consortia of LEAs to support magnet schools that are part of
an approved desegregation plan. For the purpose of the MSAP, a magnet
school is a public elementary school, public secondary school, public
elementary education center, or public secondary education center that
offers a special curriculum capable of attracting substantial numbers
of students of different racial backgrounds.
Through the implementation of magnet schools, MSAP resources
support objectives and activities that enable all elementary and
secondary students to achieve to high standards, hold schools and LEAs
accountable for ensuring they do so, and help schools and LEAs develop
and design innovative educational methods and practices that support
desegregation efforts to eliminate, reduce, or prevent minority group
isolation and increase choices in public elementary and secondary
schools.
Background on Proposed Priority
Consistent with the statutory purpose of the MSAP, magnet schools
are designed to eliminate, reduce, or prevent minority group isolation
in schools with substantial numbers or percentages of minority group
students, bring students of different backgrounds together, assist LEAs
in achieving systemic reforms, provide all students the opportunity to
meet challenging State content standards and challenging State
performance standards, and increase choices in public elementary and
secondary schools.
The priority we are proposing, Expanding Capacity to Provide
Choice, would provide eligible LEAs with an opportunity to continue to
use magnet schools, consistent with their desegregation plan objectives
for the elimination, reduction, or prevention of minority group
isolation, to expand their capacity to provide public school choice to
parents whose children attend schools identified for school
improvement, corrective action, or restructuring.
The proposed priority would provide eligible applicants the
flexibility to use either or both of two approaches to expanding their
capacity to provide public school choice.
First, an eligible applicant could convert one or more schools
identified for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring under
Title I to magnet schools in order to improve the quality of teaching
and instruction in these schools. Using this approach, conversion of a
school to a magnet school would benefit students already attending the
school by offering a magnet curriculum that would include subject
matter or teaching methodology that is generally not available at other
schools in the LEA and would be more challenging and innovative than
the curricular program that the school had previously provided. The
implementation of the magnet curriculum, along with resources such as
equipment, supplies and staff development to support the implementation
of the magnet curriculum, would also help the school reduce, eliminate,
or prevent minority group isolation at the magnet school and/or at the
sending schools by attracting other students, including higher-
achieving students of different backgrounds, based on their interest in
a curricular program that would not be available to them in the schools
that they would otherwise attend.
Second, an eligible applicant could use higher-performing schools
as magnet schools and, by doing so, significantly increase the
opportunity for students attending schools identified for school
improvement, corrective action, or restructuring to participate in
public school choice by attending a higher-performing school. Using
this approach, an eligible applicant would need to ensure that the
magnet school would have sufficient space available to accommodate
students who would likely be interested in transferring from schools
identified for school improvement, corrective action, or restructuring.
Additionally, the LEA would need to show how the enrollment of the
magnet and/or sending schools
[[Page 18730]]
(i.e., the schools identified for school improvement, corrective
action, or restructuring from which students would transfer) would
change in a manner that resulted in the elimination, reduction, or
prevention of minority group isolation in those sending schools.
Under either approach, an applicant would be required to show how
it would effectively inform parents whose children attend schools
identified for school improvement, corrective action, or restructuring
about the new choices made available to them in the magnet schools to
be funded under the project.
We will announce the final priority in a notice in the Federal
Register. We will determine the final priority after considering
responses to this notice and other information available to the
Department. This notice does not preclude us from proposing or funding
additional priorities, subject to meeting applicable rulemaking
requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use this proposed priority, we invite
applications through a notice in the Federal Register. When inviting
applications we designate the priority as absolute, competitive
preference, or invitational. The effect of each type of priority
follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority we give competitive preference to an application by either
(1) awarding additional points, depending on how well or the extent
to which the application meets the competitive priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting an application that meets the
competitive priority over an application of comparable merit that
does not meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the invitational
priority. However, we do not give an application that meets the
invitational priority a competitive or absolute preference over
other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Priority
Expanding Capacity to Provide Choice
This proposed priority supports applications that would--
(1) Help parents whose children attend low-performing schools (that
is, schools that have been identified for school improvement,
corrective action, or restructuring under Title I of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended) by--
(a) Selecting schools identified for school improvement, corrective
action, or restructuring under Title I as magnet schools to be funded
under this project and improving the quality of teaching and
instruction in these schools; or
(b) Maximizing the opportunity for students in low-performing
schools to attend higher-performing magnet schools funded under the
project and thereby reduce minority group isolation in the low-
performing sending schools; and
(2) Effectively inform parents whose children attend low-performing
schools about choices that are available to them in the magnet schools
to be funded under the project.
Note: For the purpose of selecting applications under this
priority, school improvement has the meaning given in 34 CFR
200.32(a)(1), corrective action has the meaning given in 34 CFR
200.33(a), and restructuring has the meaning given in 34 CFR
200.34(a).
Executive Order 12866
This notice of proposed priority has been reviewed in accordance
with Executive Order 12866. Under the terms of the order, we have
assessed the potential costs and benefits of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with the notice of proposed priority
are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for administering this program effectively and
efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this notice of proposed priority, we have
determined that the benefits of the proposed priority justify the
costs.
We have also determined that this regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the exercise of
their governmental functions.
Summary of potential costs and benefits: The potential cost
associated with this proposed priority is minimal while the benefits
are significant.
The benefit of the proposed priority is that it will help
applicants prepare high-quality proposals that expand their capacity to
provide public school choice to parents whose children attend schools
that have not made adequate yearly progress.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive
order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened
federalism. The Executive order relies on processes developed by State
and local governments for coordination and review of proposed Federal
financial assistance.
This document provides early notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Applicable Program Regulations: 34 CFR part 280.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may review this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:
https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll-free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in
the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
You may also view this document in text at the following site:
https://www.ed.gov/programs/magnet/applicant.html.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
nara/.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 84.165A Magnet
Schools Assistance Program)
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7231-7231j.
Dated: April 7, 2006.
Christopher J. Doherty,
Acting Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement.
[FR Doc. E6-5438 Filed 4-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P