Notice of Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada, 18072-18074 [E6-5201]
Download as PDF
18072
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Notices
Dated: April 3, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–5191 Filed 4–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–122–838
Notice of Initiation of Antidumping
Duty Changed Circumstances Review:
Certain Softwood Lumber Products
from Canada
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request from
Ivis Partners Ltd. (IVIS), the Department
of Commerce is initiating a changed
circumstances review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
softwood lumber products from Canada.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 10, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Constance Handley or David Layton,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0631or (202) 482–
0371, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background:
On May 22, 2002, the Department of
Commerce (Department) issued the
antidumping duty order on certain
softwood lumber products from Canada.
See Notice of Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Antidumping Duty
Order: Certain Softwood Lumber
Products From Canada, 67 FR 36067
(May 22, 2002). On February 16, 2006,
IVIS requested that the Department
initiate a changed circumstances review,
in accordance with section 351.216 of
the Department’s regulations, to confirm
that IVIS is the successor–in-interest to
Ivis Wood. In its request, IVIS stated
that it purchased Ivis Wood, including
equipment and inventory, and provided
supporting documentation.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order
are softwood lumber, flooring and
siding (softwood lumber products).
Softwood lumber products include all
products classified under subheadings
4407.1000, 4409.1010, 4409.1090, and
4409.1020, respectively, of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:48 Apr 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
United States (HTSUS), and any
softwood lumber, flooring and siding
described below. These softwood
lumber products include:
(1) Coniferous wood, sawn or chipped
lengthwise, sliced or peeled,
whether or not planed, sanded or
finger–jointed, of a thickness
exceeding six millimeters;
(2) Coniferous wood siding (including
strips and friezes for parquet
flooring, not assembled)
continuously shaped (tongued,
grooved, rabbeted, chamfered, v–
jointed, beaded, molded, rounded
or the like) along any of its edges or
faces, whether or not planed,
sanded or finger–jointed;
(3) Other coniferous wood (including
strips and friezes for parquet
flooring, not assembled)
continuously shaped (tongued,
grooved, rabbeted, chamfered, v–
jointed, beaded, molded, rounded
or the like) along any of its edges or
faces (other than wood mouldings
and wood dowel rods) whether or
not planed, sanded or finger–
jointed; and
(4) Coniferous wood flooring
(including strips and friezes for
parquet flooring, not assembled)
continuously shaped (tongued,
grooved, rabbeted, chamfered, v–
jointed, beaded, molded, rounded
or the like) along any of its edges or
faces, whether or not planed,
sanded or finger–jointed.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and U.S.
Customs purposes, the written
description of the merchandise subject
to this order is dispositive.
As specifically stated in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum
accompanying the Notice of Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Certain Softwood Lumber
Products from Canada, 67 FR 15539
(April 2, 2002) (see comment 53, item D
and comment 57, item B–7) available at
www.ia.ita.doc.gov/frn, drilled and
notched lumber and angle cut lumber
are covered by the scope of this order.
The following softwood lumber
products are excluded from the scope of
this order provided they meet the
specified requirements detailed below:
(1) Stringers (pallet components used
for runners): if they have at least
two notches on the side, positioned
at equal distance from the center, to
properly accommodate forklift
blades, properly classified under
HTSUS 4421.90.98.40.
(2) Box–spring frame kits: if they
contain the following wooden
pieces - two side rails, two end (or
top) rails and varying numbers of
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
slats. The side rails and the end
rails should be radius–cut at both
ends. The kits should be
individually packaged, they should
contain the exact number of
wooden components needed to
make a particular box spring frame,
with no further processing required.
None of the components exceeds 1’’
in actual thickness or 83’’ in length.
(3) Radius–cut box–spring-frame
components, not exceeding 1’’ in
actual thickness or 83’’ in length,
ready for assembly without further
processing. The radius cuts must be
present on both ends of the boards
and must be substantial cuts so as
to completely round one corner.
(4) Fence pickets requiring no further
processing and properly classified
under HTSUS 4421.90.70, 1’’ or less
in actual thickness, up to 8’’ wide,
6’ or less in length, and have finials
or decorative cuttings that clearly
identify them as fence pickets. In
the case of dog–eared fence pickets,
the corners of the boards should be
cut off so as to remove pieces of
wood in the shape of isosceles right
angle triangles with sides
measuring 3/4 inch or more.
(5) U.S. origin lumber shipped to
Canada for minor processing and
imported into the United States, is
excluded from the scope of this
order if the following conditions are
met: 1) the processing occurring in
Canada is limited to kiln–drying,
planing to create smooth–to-size
board, and sanding, and 2) if the
importer establishes to the
satisfaction of U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) that the
lumber is of U.S. origin.
(6) Softwood lumber products
contained in single family home
packages or kits1, regardless of tariff
classification, are excluded from the
scope of this order if the importer
certifies to items 6 A, B, C, D, and
requirement 6 E is met:
A. The imported home package or kit
constitutes a full package of the
number of wooden pieces specified
in the plan, design or blueprint
necessary to produce a home of at
least 700 square feet produced to a
specified plan, design or blueprint;
B. The package or kit must contain all
necessary internal and external
doors and windows, nails, screws,
glue, sub floor, sheathing, beams,
1 To ensure administrability, we clarified the
language of exclusion number 6 to require an
importer certification and to permit single or
multiple entries on multiple days as well as
instructing importers to retain and make available
for inspection specific documentation in support of
each entry.
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Notices
posts, connectors, and if included
in the purchase contract, decking,
trim, drywall and roof shingles
specified in the plan, design or
blueprint;
C. Prior to importation, the package or
kit must be sold to a retailer of
complete home packages or kits
pursuant to a valid purchase
contract referencing the particular
home design plan or blueprint, and
signed by a customer not affiliated
with the importer;
D. Softwood lumber products entered
as part of a single family home
package or kit, whether in a single
entry or multiple entries on
multiple days, will be used solely
for the construction of the single
family home specified by the home
design matching the entry.
E. For each entry, the following
documentation must be retained by
the importer and made available to
CBP upon request:
i. A copy of the appropriate home
design, plan, or blueprint matching
the entry;
ii. A purchase contract from a retailer
of home kits or packages signed by
a customer not affiliated with the
importer;
iii. A listing of inventory of all parts
of the package or kit being entered
that conforms to the home design
package being entered;
iv. In the case of multiple shipments
on the same contract, all items
listed in E(iii) which are included
in the present shipment shall be
identified as well.
Lumber products that CBP may
classify as stringers, radius cut box–
spring-frame components, and fence
pickets, not conforming to the above
requirements, as well as truss
components, pallet components, and
door and window frame parts, are
covered under the scope of this order
and may be classified under HTSUS
subheadings 4418.90.45.90,
4421.90.70.40, and 4421.90.97.40.
Finally, as clarified throughout the
course of the investigation, the
following products, previously
identified as Group A, remain outside
the scope of this order. They are:
1. Trusses and truss kits, properly
classified under HTSUS 4418.90;
2. I–joist beams;
3. Assembled box spring frames;
4. Pallets and pallet kits, properly
classified under HTSUS 4415.20;
5. Garage doors;
6. Edge–glued wood, properly
classified under HTSUS
4421.90.98.40;
7. Properly classified complete door
frames;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:48 Apr 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
8. Properly classified complete
window frames;
9. Properly classified furniture.
In addition, this scope language was
further clarified to specify that all
softwood lumber products entered from
Canada claiming non–subject status
based on U.S. country of origin will be
treated as non–subject U.S.-origin
merchandise under the antidumping
and countervailing duty orders,
provided that these softwood lumber
products meet the following condition:
upon entry, the importer, exporter,
Canadian processor and/or original U.S.
producer establish to CBP’s satisfaction
that the softwood lumber entered and
documented as U.S.-origin softwood
lumber was first produced in the United
States as a lumber product satisfying the
physical parameters of the softwood
lumber scope.2 The presumption of
non–subject status can, however, be
rebutted by evidence demonstrating that
the merchandise was substantially
transformed in Canada.
On March 3, 2006 the Department
issued a scope ruling that any product
entering under HTSUS 4409.10.05
which is continually shaped along its
end and/or side edges which otherwise
conforms to the written definition of the
scope is within the scope of the order.3
Initiation
Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
the Department will conduct a changed
circumstances review upon receipt of
information concerning, or a request
from an interested party for a review of,
an antidumping duty order which
shows changed circumstances sufficient
to warrant a review of the order. As
indicated in the Background section, we
have received information indicating
that Ivis Wood has been sold to IVIS.
This constitutes changed circumstances
warranting a review of the order.
Therefore, in accordance with section
751(b)(1) of the Act, we are initiating a
changed circumstances review based
upon the information contained in IVIS’
request.
In making successor–in-interest
determinations, the Department
examines several factors including, but
not limited to, changes in: (1)
Management; (2) production facilities;
(3) supplier relationships; and (4)
2 See the scope clarification message (ι 3034202),
dated February 3, 2003, to CBP, regarding treatment
of U.S. origin lumber on file in Room B-099 of the
Central Records Unit (CRU) of the Main Commerce
Building.
3 See memorandum from Constance Handley,
Program Manager to Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy
Assistant Secretary regarding: Scope Request by the
Petitioner Regarding Entries Made Under HTSUS
4409.10.05, dated March 3, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18073
customer base. See, e.g.,
Polychloroprene Rubber from Japan:
Final Results of Changed Circumstances
Review, 67 FR 58 (January 2, 2002)
citing, Brass Sheet and Strip from
Canada: Notice of Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 57 FR 20460 (May 13, 1992).
While no single factor, or combination
of factors, will necessarily prove
dispositive, the Department will
generally consider the new company to
be the successor to its predecessor
company if the resulting operations are
essentially the same as the predecessor
company. Id. citing, Industrial
Phosphoric Acid from Israel; Final
Results of Changed Circumstances
Review, 59 FR 6944, 6945 (February 14,
1994). Thus, if the evidence
demonstrates that, with respect to the
production and sale of the subject
merchandise, the new company
operates as the same business entity as
its predecessor, the Department will
assign the new company the cash–
deposit rate of its predecessor.
In its February 3, 2006, submission
(received by the Department on
February 16, 2006), Ivis states that it
was incorporated in British Columbia
on September 5, 2005, and that on
September 30, 2005, it purchased Ivis
Wood, including its equipment and
inventory. According to IVIS, in light of
the purchase, it is clear that IVIS is the
successor–in-interest to Ivis Wood. To
support its claims, IVIS submitted: (1)
Copies of Certificate of Incorporation;
(2) the Purchase and Sale Agreement
between IVIS and Ivis Wood and; (3) a
list of both companies’ U.S. customers.
IVIS has requested that the
Department initiate an expedited review
pursuant to section 751(b) of the Act
and 19 CFR § 351.221(c)(3)(iii).
However, because it is the Department’s
practice to examine changes in
management, supplier relationships,
and customers in the home market (as
well as the U.S. market), as part of its
analysis in such a determination, and
IVIS has not addressed these factors, it
is necessary to request further
information from IVIS prior to issuing
preliminary results. Therefore, we are
unable to conduct the changed
circumstances review on an expedited
basis.
After the initiation of the review, the
Department will issue a questionnaire
requesting additional factual
information for the review in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(2).
The Department will publish in the
Federal Register a notice of preliminary
results of changed circumstances review
which will set forth the factual and legal
conclusions upon which our
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
18074
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Notices
preliminary results are based, and a
description of any action proposed
based on those results in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4) and 19 CFR
351.221(c)(3)(i). Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.221(b)(4)(ii), interested parties will
have an opportunity to comment on the
preliminary results of the review. The
Department will issue its final results of
review within 270 days after the date on
which the changed circumstances
review is initiated, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.216(e), and will publish
these results in the Federal Register.
The current requirement for a cash
deposit of estimated antidumping duties
on all subject merchandise will
continue unless and until it is modified
pursuant to the final results of this
changed circumstances review.
This notice is in accordance with
section 751(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.216 and 351.221 of the
Department’s regulations.
Dated: April 3, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–5201 Filed 4–7–06; 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–580–834)
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils
from the Republic of Korea;
Preliminary Results and Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request by
Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, AK
Steel Corporation, North American
Stainless, United Auto Workers Local
3303, Zanesville Armco Independent
Organization, Inc., and the United
Steelworkers (collectively ‘‘the
petitioners’’), the Department of
Commerce (the Department) is
conducting an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on stainless
steel sheet and strip in coils (SSSSC)
from the Republic of Korea (Korea). This
review covers five producers/exporters
of the subject merchandise to the United
States. This is the sixth period of review
(POR), covering July 1, 2004, through
June 30, 2005.
We have preliminarily determined
that the sole company participating in
this review, DaiYang Metal Co., Ltd.
(DMC), has made sales below normal
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:48 Apr 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
value (NV). In addition, we
preliminarily determine that adverse
facts available (AFA) should be applied
to the remaining four companies
(Boorim Corporation (Boorim), Dae
Kyung Corporation (Dae Kyung), Dine
Trading Co., Ltd. (Dine), and Dosko Co.,
Ltd. (Dosko)) for the POR because they
declined to participate in this
administrative review. If these
preliminary results are adopted in the
final results of this review, we will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries.
In addition, we have preliminarily
determined to rescind the review with
respect to the following companies
because these companies had no
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR: BNG Steel Co. (BNG),
Hyundai Corporation (Hyundai), NIC
International Co., Ltd. (NIC), Pohang
Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. (POSCO),
Samkyung Corporation (Samkyung),
Sammi Corporation (Sammi), Samwon
Precision Metals Co., Ltd. (Samwon),
and Sun Woo Tech Company (Sun
Woo).
We invite interested parties to
comment on these preliminary results.
Parties who wish to submit comments
in this proceeding are requested to
submit with each argument: (1) a
statement of the issue; and (2) a brief
summary of the argument.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 10, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irina
Itkin or Brianne Riker, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20230;
telephone (202) 482–0656 or (202) 482–
0629, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 1, 2005, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice of ‘‘Opportunity To Request
Administrative Review’’ of the
antidumping duty order on SSSSC from
Korea (70 FR 38099).
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b)(1), on July 29, 2005, the
Department received a request from the
petitioners to conduct an administrative
review for the following 13 producers/
exporters of SSSSC: BNG, Boorim, Dae
Kyung, Dine, DMC, Dosko, Hyundai,
NIC, POSCO, Samkyung, Sammi,
Samwon, and Sun Woo.
In August 2005, the Department
initiated an administrative review and
issued questionnaires to each of these
companies. See Initiation of
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Requests
for Revocation in Part, 70 FR 51009
(Aug. 29, 2005).
In August, September, and October
2005, the following companies informed
the Department that they had no
shipments or entries of subject
merchandise during the POR: BNG,
Hyundai, NIC, POSCO, Samkyoung,
Sammi, Samwon, and Sun Woo. We
reviewed CBP data and confirmed that
there were no entries of subject
merchandise from any of these
companies. See ‘‘Partial Rescission of
Review,’’ below, for further discussion.
Consequently, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.213(d)(3) and consistent with
our practice, we are preliminarily
rescinding our review for BNG,
Hyundai, NIC, POSCO, Samkyoung,
Sammi, Samwon, and Sun Woo.
However, we note that Boorim, Dae
Kyung, Dine, and Dokso did not
respond to the Department’s
questionnaire. For further discussion,
see the ‘‘Application of Facts Available’’
section, below.
In October 2005, we received a
response to sections A through C of the
questionnaire (i.e., the sections
regarding sales to the home market and
the United States) and section D of the
questionnaire (i.e., the section regarding
cost of production (COP) and
constructed value (CV)) from DMC.
In December 2005 and January 2006,
we issued supplemental questionnaires
to DMC. We received responses to these
questionnaires in February 2006. In
March 2006, we issued an additional
supplemental questionnaire to DMC; we
received DMC’s response to this
questionnaire on March 15, 2006.
Scope of the Order
The products covered are certain
stainless steel sheet and strip in coils.
Stainless steel is an alloy steel
containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or
less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more
of chromium, with or without other
elements. The subject sheet and strip is
a flat–rolled product in coils that is
greater than 9.5 millimeters in width
and less than 4.75 millimeters in
thickness, and that is annealed or
otherwise heat treated and pickled or
otherwise descaled. The subject sheet
and strip may also be further processed
(e.g., cold–rolled, polished, aluminized,
coated, etc.) provided that it maintains
the specific dimensions of sheet and
strip following such processing.
The merchandise subject to this order
is classified in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
at subheadings: 7219.13.0031,
7219.13.0051, 7219.13.0071,
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18072-18074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-5201]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A-122-838
Notice of Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances
Review: Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request from Ivis Partners Ltd. (IVIS), the
Department of Commerce is initiating a changed circumstances review of
the antidumping duty order on certain softwood lumber products from
Canada.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 10, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Constance Handley or David Layton, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0631or (202) 482-0371, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background:
On May 22, 2002, the Department of Commerce (Department) issued the
antidumping duty order on certain softwood lumber products from Canada.
See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Softwood Lumber Products From
Canada, 67 FR 36067 (May 22, 2002). On February 16, 2006, IVIS
requested that the Department initiate a changed circumstances review,
in accordance with section 351.216 of the Department's regulations, to
confirm that IVIS is the successor-in-interest to Ivis Wood. In its
request, IVIS stated that it purchased Ivis Wood, including equipment
and inventory, and provided supporting documentation.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order are softwood lumber, flooring
and siding (softwood lumber products). Softwood lumber products include
all products classified under subheadings 4407.1000, 4409.1010,
4409.1090, and 4409.1020, respectively, of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), and any softwood lumber,
flooring and siding described below. These softwood lumber products
include:
(1) Coniferous wood, sawn or chipped lengthwise, sliced or peeled,
whether or not planed, sanded or finger-jointed, of a thickness
exceeding six millimeters;
(2) Coniferous wood siding (including strips and friezes for
parquet flooring, not assembled) continuously shaped (tongued, grooved,
rabbeted, chamfered, v-jointed, beaded, molded, rounded or the like)
along any of its edges or faces, whether or not planed, sanded or
finger-jointed;
(3) Other coniferous wood (including strips and friezes for parquet
flooring, not assembled) continuously shaped (tongued, grooved,
rabbeted, chamfered, v-jointed, beaded, molded, rounded or the like)
along any of its edges or faces (other than wood mouldings and wood
dowel rods) whether or not planed, sanded or finger-jointed; and
(4) Coniferous wood flooring (including strips and friezes for
parquet flooring, not assembled) continuously shaped (tongued, grooved,
rabbeted, chamfered, v-jointed, beaded, molded, rounded or the like)
along any of its edges or faces, whether or not planed, sanded or
finger-jointed.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and
U.S. Customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise
subject to this order is dispositive.
As specifically stated in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
accompanying the Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada, 67 FR 15539
(April 2, 2002) (see comment 53, item D and comment 57, item B-7)
available at www.ia.ita.doc.gov/frn, drilled and notched lumber and
angle cut lumber are covered by the scope of this order.
The following softwood lumber products are excluded from the scope
of this order provided they meet the specified requirements detailed
below:
(1) Stringers (pallet components used for runners): if they have at
least two notches on the side, positioned at equal distance from the
center, to properly accommodate forklift blades, properly classified
under HTSUS 4421.90.98.40.
(2) Box-spring frame kits: if they contain the following wooden
pieces - two side rails, two end (or top) rails and varying numbers of
slats. The side rails and the end rails should be radius-cut at both
ends. The kits should be individually packaged, they should contain the
exact number of wooden components needed to make a particular box
spring frame, with no further processing required. None of the
components exceeds 1'' in actual thickness or 83'' in length.
(3) Radius-cut box-spring-frame components, not exceeding 1'' in
actual thickness or 83'' in length, ready for assembly without further
processing. The radius cuts must be present on both ends of the boards
and must be substantial cuts so as to completely round one corner.
(4) Fence pickets requiring no further processing and properly
classified under HTSUS 4421.90.70, 1'' or less in actual thickness, up
to 8'' wide, 6' or less in length, and have finials or decorative
cuttings that clearly identify them as fence pickets. In the case of
dog-eared fence pickets, the corners of the boards should be cut off so
as to remove pieces of wood in the shape of isosceles right angle
triangles with sides measuring 3/4 inch or more.
(5) U.S. origin lumber shipped to Canada for minor processing and
imported into the United States, is excluded from the scope of this
order if the following conditions are met: 1) the processing occurring
in Canada is limited to kiln-drying, planing to create smooth-to-size
board, and sanding, and 2) if the importer establishes to the
satisfaction of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) that the
lumber is of U.S. origin.
(6) Softwood lumber products contained in single family home
packages or kits\1\, regardless of tariff classification, are excluded
from the scope of this order if the importer certifies to items 6 A, B,
C, D, and requirement 6 E is met:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To ensure administrability, we clarified the language of
exclusion number 6 to require an importer certification and to
permit single or multiple entries on multiple days as well as
instructing importers to retain and make available for inspection
specific documentation in support of each entry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. The imported home package or kit constitutes a full package of
the number of wooden pieces specified in the plan, design or blueprint
necessary to produce a home of at least 700 square feet produced to a
specified plan, design or blueprint;
B. The package or kit must contain all necessary internal and
external doors and windows, nails, screws, glue, sub floor, sheathing,
beams,
[[Page 18073]]
posts, connectors, and if included in the purchase contract, decking,
trim, drywall and roof shingles specified in the plan, design or
blueprint;
C. Prior to importation, the package or kit must be sold to a
retailer of complete home packages or kits pursuant to a valid purchase
contract referencing the particular home design plan or blueprint, and
signed by a customer not affiliated with the importer;
D. Softwood lumber products entered as part of a single family home
package or kit, whether in a single entry or multiple entries on
multiple days, will be used solely for the construction of the single
family home specified by the home design matching the entry.
E. For each entry, the following documentation must be retained by
the importer and made available to CBP upon request:
i. A copy of the appropriate home design, plan, or blueprint
matching the entry;
ii. A purchase contract from a retailer of home kits or packages
signed by a customer not affiliated with the importer;
iii. A listing of inventory of all parts of the package or kit
being entered that conforms to the home design package being entered;
iv. In the case of multiple shipments on the same contract, all
items listed in E(iii) which are included in the present shipment shall
be identified as well.
Lumber products that CBP may classify as stringers, radius cut box-
spring-frame components, and fence pickets, not conforming to the above
requirements, as well as truss components, pallet components, and door
and window frame parts, are covered under the scope of this order and
may be classified under HTSUS subheadings 4418.90.45.90, 4421.90.70.40,
and 4421.90.97.40.
Finally, as clarified throughout the course of the investigation,
the following products, previously identified as Group A, remain
outside the scope of this order. They are:
1. Trusses and truss kits, properly classified under HTSUS 4418.90;
2. I-joist beams;
3. Assembled box spring frames;
4. Pallets and pallet kits, properly classified under HTSUS
4415.20;
5. Garage doors;
6. Edge-glued wood, properly classified under HTSUS 4421.90.98.40;
7. Properly classified complete door frames;
8. Properly classified complete window frames;
9. Properly classified furniture.
In addition, this scope language was further clarified to specify
that all softwood lumber products entered from Canada claiming non-
subject status based on U.S. country of origin will be treated as non-
subject U.S.-origin merchandise under the antidumping and
countervailing duty orders, provided that these softwood lumber
products meet the following condition: upon entry, the importer,
exporter, Canadian processor and/or original U.S. producer establish to
CBP's satisfaction that the softwood lumber entered and documented as
U.S.-origin softwood lumber was first produced in the United States as
a lumber product satisfying the physical parameters of the softwood
lumber scope.\2\ The presumption of non-subject status can, however, be
rebutted by evidence demonstrating that the merchandise was
substantially transformed in Canada.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See the scope clarification message ( 3034202),
dated February 3, 2003, to CBP, regarding treatment of U.S. origin
lumber on file in Room B-099 of the Central Records Unit (CRU) of
the Main Commerce Building.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 3, 2006 the Department issued a scope ruling that any
product entering under HTSUS 4409.10.05 which is continually shaped
along its end and/or side edges which otherwise conforms to the written
definition of the scope is within the scope of the order.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See memorandum from Constance Handley, Program Manager to
Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary regarding: Scope
Request by the Petitioner Regarding Entries Made Under HTSUS
4409.10.05, dated March 3, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initiation
Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), the Department will conduct a changed circumstances review
upon receipt of information concerning, or a request from an interested
party for a review of, an antidumping duty order which shows changed
circumstances sufficient to warrant a review of the order. As indicated
in the Background section, we have received information indicating that
Ivis Wood has been sold to IVIS. This constitutes changed circumstances
warranting a review of the order. Therefore, in accordance with section
751(b)(1) of the Act, we are initiating a changed circumstances review
based upon the information contained in IVIS' request.
In making successor-in-interest determinations, the Department
examines several factors including, but not limited to, changes in: (1)
Management; (2) production facilities; (3) supplier relationships; and
(4) customer base. See, e.g., Polychloroprene Rubber from Japan: Final
Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 67 FR 58 (January 2, 2002)
citing, Brass Sheet and Strip from Canada: Notice of Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 57 FR 20460 (May 13, 1992).
While no single factor, or combination of factors, will necessarily
prove dispositive, the Department will generally consider the new
company to be the successor to its predecessor company if the resulting
operations are essentially the same as the predecessor company. Id.
citing, Industrial Phosphoric Acid from Israel; Final Results of
Changed Circumstances Review, 59 FR 6944, 6945 (February 14, 1994).
Thus, if the evidence demonstrates that, with respect to the production
and sale of the subject merchandise, the new company operates as the
same business entity as its predecessor, the Department will assign the
new company the cash-deposit rate of its predecessor.
In its February 3, 2006, submission (received by the Department on
February 16, 2006), Ivis states that it was incorporated in British
Columbia on September 5, 2005, and that on September 30, 2005, it
purchased Ivis Wood, including its equipment and inventory. According
to IVIS, in light of the purchase, it is clear that IVIS is the
successor-in-interest to Ivis Wood. To support its claims, IVIS
submitted: (1) Copies of Certificate of Incorporation; (2) the Purchase
and Sale Agreement between IVIS and Ivis Wood and; (3) a list of both
companies' U.S. customers.
IVIS has requested that the Department initiate an expedited review
pursuant to section 751(b) of the Act and 19 CFR Sec.
351.221(c)(3)(iii). However, because it is the Department's practice to
examine changes in management, supplier relationships, and customers in
the home market (as well as the U.S. market), as part of its analysis
in such a determination, and IVIS has not addressed these factors, it
is necessary to request further information from IVIS prior to issuing
preliminary results. Therefore, we are unable to conduct the changed
circumstances review on an expedited basis.
After the initiation of the review, the Department will issue a
questionnaire requesting additional factual information for the review
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(2). The Department will publish in
the Federal Register a notice of preliminary results of changed
circumstances review which will set forth the factual and legal
conclusions upon which our
[[Page 18074]]
preliminary results are based, and a description of any action proposed
based on those results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4) and 19
CFR 351.221(c)(3)(i). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4)(ii), interested
parties will have an opportunity to comment on the preliminary results
of the review. The Department will issue its final results of review
within 270 days after the date on which the changed circumstances
review is initiated, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.216(e), and will
publish these results in the Federal Register.
The current requirement for a cash deposit of estimated antidumping
duties on all subject merchandise will continue unless and until it is
modified pursuant to the final results of this changed circumstances
review.
This notice is in accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.216 and 351.221 of the Department's regulations.
Dated: April 3, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-5201 Filed 4-7-06; 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 3510-DS-S