Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto and Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Amendment No. 3 Thereto Relating to Rule 4350(e) To Amend the Annual Shareholder Meeting Requirement, 17532-17534 [E6-5033]
Download as PDF
17532
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 66 / Thursday, April 6, 2006 / Notices
exemption are required to capture and
maintain certain information required
by the OATS Rules pursuant to other
NASD and Commission rules.13
The Commission also notes that the
NASD initially plans to limit an
exemption available under this proposal
to six months and re-evaluate whether
to grant further exemptions after the
expiration of the six-month period. The
Commission believes that by initially
limiting the exemption to qualifying
member firms to six months, firms may
have sufficient time to become familiar
with NASD’s enhanced Web interface
and to discuss with NASD any problems
encountered.
Finally, the Commission believes that
the NASD’s proposed requirement that
a firm receiving an exemption under the
proposed rule change re-apply after six
months and at least every two years
should help to ensure that firms
applying for the exemption are
continuing to meet the exemption
requirements.
The Commission understands that the
NASD wants to provide members
eligible for an exemption adequate
notice as to whether they will be
required to comply with the OATS
recording requirement on May 8, 2006.
The Commission believes that allowing
accelerated approval of this proposed
rule change would give members
eligible for the exemption more time to
evaluate their options with respect to
the OATS Rules and hopefully prevent
unnecessary hardships or expense that
may otherwise occur without
accelerated approval. The Commission,
therefore, finds good cause for
approving this proposal before the
thirtieth day after the publication of
notice thereof in the Federal Register.
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,14 that the
proposed rule change, as amended (SR–
NASD–2006–040), is hereby approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–4986 Filed 4–5–06; 8:45 am]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
13 See e.g., NASD Rule 3110 and 17 CFR 240.17a–
3 and page 6, supra.
14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
15 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:52 Apr 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–53578; File No. SR–NASD–
2005–073]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Order Granting Approval
of a Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto and
Notice of Filing and Order Granting
Accelerated Approval of Amendment
No. 3 Thereto Relating to Rule 4350(e)
To Amend the Annual Shareholder
Meeting Requirement
March 30, 2006.
On June 6, 2005, the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(‘‘NASD’’), through its subsidiary, The
Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (‘‘Nasdaq’’),
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to amend NASD Rule 4350 in
order to change its annual shareholder
meeting requirement. On December 5,
2005, Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 1 to
the proposed rule change.3 On
December 9, 2005, Nasdaq filed
Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule
change.4 The proposed rule change, as
amended, was published for comment
in the Federal Register on December 28,
2005.5 No comments were received
regarding the proposal. On March 16,
2006, Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 3 to
the proposed rule change.6 This order
approves the proposed rule change, as
amended, publishes notice of
Amendment No. 3 to the proposed rule
change, and grants accelerated approval
to Amendment No. 3.
I. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
NASD Rule 4350(e) currently requires
all Nasdaq issuers to hold an annual
meeting of shareholders and to provide
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 3 In Amendment No. 1, Nasdaq revised the
proposed rule text and corresponding description of
the proposal in its Form 19b–4. Amendment No. 1
replaced Nasdaq’s original filing in its entirety.
4 In Amendment No. 2, Nasdaq made clarifying
changes to the proposed rule text of IM–4350–8
with respect to certain issuers still subject to the
annual shareholder meeting requirement under
NASD Rule 4350(e).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52985
(December 20, 2005), 70 FR 76895.
6 In Amendment No. 3, Nasdaq made further
clarifying changes to the proposed rule text of IM–
4350–8 to state that at the annual shareholder
meeting, shareholders must be afforded the
opportunity to discuss company affairs with
management and, if required by the issuer’s
governing documents, to elect directors.
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
notice of such meeting to Nasdaq.
Nasdaq recognizes the significance of
annual shareholder meetings because
they allow the equity owners of a
company—typically its common
stockholders—the opportunity to elect
directors and meet with management to
discuss company affairs.
Nasdaq, however, believes that the
annual shareholder meeting
requirement is not necessary for, or
applicable to, an issuer with respect to
certain types of its listed securities
because the holders of those securities
do not directly participate as equity
holders and do not vote in the election
of directors. Specifically, Nasdaq makes
reference to securities listed pursuant to
NASD Rule 4420(f) (Quantitative
Designation Criteria, Other Securities),
which allows for the listing of securities
that possess attributes or features of
more than one category of security.7
Nasdaq believes that these securities
typically are not an issuer’s primary
equity security, and their holders have
only limited economic interests and
other rights.
Nasdaq also believes that Portfolio
Depository Receipts (listed pursuant to
NASD Rule 4420(i)) and Index Fund
Shares (listed pursuant to NASD Rule
4420(j)), which are securities issued by
unit investment trusts and open-end
management investment companies,
respectively, that are organized as
exchange-traded funds, should not be
required to hold an annual shareholder
meeting. According to Nasdaq, these
exchange-traded funds are generally
passive investment vehicles that seek to
match the performance of an index and
must obtain an exemptive order from
the Commission before they offer
securities. As a result, Nasdaq notes that
the operations of the issuers of these
securities are circumscribed by
numerous representations and
conditions of the applicable orders, and
that the issuers of these securities do not
typically experience the need for
operational or other changes requiring a
shareholder vote, and, by extension, a
shareholder meeting.
Finally, Nasdaq would exclude from
its annual shareholder meeting
requirement those issuers listing Trust
Issued Receipts (listed pursuant to
NASD Rule 4420(l)), which are
securities issued by a trust that holds,
7 Securities currently listed under Rule 4420(f)
include: (i) Trust Preferred Securities, the payments
on which are linked to the performance of another
security; (ii) Index Linked Notes, the payments on
which are linked to the performance of an
underlying index; and (iii) Contingent Value Rights,
the performance of which are tied to the
performance of another security, a particular
division of the company, or the occurrence of a
certain event.
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
06APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 66 / Thursday, April 6, 2006 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
but does not manage, specific securities
on behalf of the investors in the trust.
Nasdaq notes that these trusts do not
hold shareholder (or unitholder)
meetings because the trusts have no
boards of directors and essentially serve
only as conduits for the investors’
indirect investments in the underlying
securities of the trusts.
For the foregoing reasons, Nasdaq
proposes to amend NASD Rule 4350(e)
such that the requirement to hold an
annual shareholder meeting would be
applicable only to those Nasdaq issuers
as a result of listing voting and nonvoting common stock and voting
preferred stock, and their respective
equivalents. Under the proposal, issuers
of securities listed under NASD Rules
4420(f), 4420(i), 4420(j), and 4420(l)
would specifically be excluded from the
annual meeting requirement in
proposed IM–4350–8. The proposal
makes clear, however, that issuers of
such securities are still required to hold
an annual shareholder meeting with
respect to the listing of common stock
or voting preferred stock, or their
equivalents.8 By clearly identifying
those issuers that will be subject to the
annual shareholder meeting
requirement, Nasdaq believes that
NASD Rule 4350(e) will be more
transparent.
In addition, NASD Rule 4350(e)
currently requires all Nasdaq issuers to
provide notice of their annual
shareholder meetings to Nasdaq. In
practice, however, Nasdaq states that it
does not rely on this notification to
monitor compliance with the annual
shareholder meeting requirement.
Instead, Nasdaq represents that its staff
reviews proxy statements (and, in the
case of issuers that do not file proxy
statements, other Commission filings) to
determine compliance. For these
reasons, Nasdaq proposes to further
amend NASD Rule 4350(e) to eliminate
the notification requirement.
Finally, while NASD Rule 4350(e)
currently does not provide a deadline
8 Proposed IM–4350–8 provides that the
requirement to hold an annual shareholder meeting
would not be applicable as a result of an issuer
listing the following types of securities: ‘‘securities
listed pursuant to Rule 4420(f) (such as Trust
Preferred Securities and Contingent Value Rights),
unless the listed security is a common stock or
voting preferred stock equivalent (e.g., a callable
common stock); Portfolio Depository Receipts listed
pursuant to Rule 4420(i); Index Fund Shares listed
pursuant to Rule 4420(j); and Trust Issued Receipts
listed pursuant to Rule 4420(l). Notwithstanding, if
the issuer also lists common stock or voting
preferred stock, or their equivalent, the issuer must
still hold an annual meeting for the holders of that
common stock or voting preferred stock, or their
equivalent.’’ See Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 52985 (December 20, 2005), 70 FR 76895,
76896.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:52 Apr 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
for holding the annual shareholder
meeting, Nasdaq proposes that the
annual shareholder meeting must be
held within one year of the end of the
issuer’s fiscal year.9 At each such
meeting, shareholders must be afforded
the opportunity to discuss company
affairs with management and, if
required by the issuer’s governing
documents, to elect directors. Nasdaq
believes that codifying this time frame
would provide additional transparency
to the annual shareholder meeting
requirement.
II. Discussion and Commission
Findings
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
association 10 and, in particular, the
requirements of Section 15A(b)(6) of the
Act 11 and the rules and regulations
thereunder. Specifically, the
Commission finds that the proposal to
amend the annual shareholder meeting
requirement is consistent with Section
15A(b)(6) of the Act because it is
designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove
impediments to a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest, and is not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between
issuers.
A. Applicability of the Annual
Shareholder Meeting Requirement
The proposal sets forth which Nasdaq
issuers are required to hold annual
shareholder meetings and excludes from
the annual shareholder meeting
requirement issuers listing certain types
of securities with respect to which the
shareholders typically have a limited
interest.12 The Commission notes that
Nasdaq’s proposed annual shareholder
meeting requirement remains subject to
any applicable state and federal
securities laws that relate to such
annual meetings; as a result, an issuer
that lists one or more of the types of
securities set forth in proposed IM–
4350–8 may still be required to hold
annual shareholder meetings in
accordance with such state and federal
9 See
infra note 14.
approving this proposal, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
11 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
12 For example, as noted above, shareholders of
some of these securities have a limited economic
interest in the issuer and do not even vote for a
board of directors.
10 In
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17533
securities laws. In addition, the
Commission notes that issuers of
Nasdaq-listed securities, including the
types of securities set forth in proposed
IM–4350–8, remain subject to state and
federal securities laws that may require
other types of shareholder meetings,
such as special meetings of
shareholders. For example, exchangetraded funds are registered under, and
remain subject to, the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (‘‘Investment
Company Act’’), which imposes various
shareholder-voting requirements that
may be applicable to such funds.13
The proposal also clarifies that, under
the NASD rules, the right not to hold an
annual shareholder meeting, as set forth
in proposed IM–4350–8, applies only
with respect to the particular securities
specified in proposed IM–4350–8. Thus,
although the proposed rule change
excludes a particular Nasdaq issuer
from holding an annual shareholder
meeting with respect to, and as a result
of listing, the specific type of security
specified in proposed IM–4350–8, if
such issuer also lists other common
stock or voting preferred-stock, or their
equivalent, such issuer must
nevertheless hold an annual meeting for
the holders of that common stock or
voting preferred-stock, or their
equivalent, under the proposal. In
addition, proposed IM–4350–8 makes
clear that issuers listing securities under
NASD Rule 4420(f) (Other Securities),
which allows for the listing of Trust
Preferred Securities, Index Linked
Notes, and Contingent Value Rights,
among others, will still be subject to the
annual shareholder meeting
requirement, irrespective of whether
such securities are listed under NASD
Rule 4420(f), if such securities have the
attributes of common stock or voting
preferred stock, or their equivalents.
Given the limited rights and other
interests of the holders of those
securities specified in proposed IM–
4350–8 and the applicability of federal
and state securities laws that govern
shareholder meetings, the Commission
believes that the proposed rule change
reasonably sets forth the scope of the
annual shareholder meeting
requirement and will ensure that the
appropriate Nasdaq-listed companies
are required to hold annual shareholder
meetings under NASD rules, for the
benefit of investors and the public
interest.
13 See e.g., Section 16 of the Investment Company
Act, which requires, among others, an investment
company’s initial board of directors to be elected by
the shareholders at an annual or special meeting.
15 U.S.C. 80a–16(a).
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
06APN1
17534
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 66 / Thursday, April 6, 2006 / Notices
B. Notification of the Annual
Shareholder Meeting
With respect to Nasdaq’s proposal to
eliminate the notice requirement in
NASD Rule 4350(e), the Commission
believes that, because Nasdaq’s practice
to monitor the annual shareholder
meeting requirement involves the
review of proxy statements and other
Commission filings, the current
notification requirement is redundant
and its elimination from NASD Rule
4350(e) would be reasonable. Of course,
Nasdaq will still be required to ensure
compliance with the annual shareholder
meeting requirement and is simply
eliminating a notification requirement
which Nasdaq claims is not necessary.
The proposed change would be
consistent with Section 15A(b)(6) of the
Act because the elimination of a
redundancy and an unnecessary
obligation of Nasdaq issuers removes
impediments to the mechanism of a free
and open market and a national market
system, while continuing to ensure the
protection of investors and the public
interest.
C. Timing of the Annual Shareholder
Meeting
Finally, the provision concerning the
holding of an annual meeting is being
amended to require that the annual
meeting must be held within one year
after the end of the fiscal year. The
Commission believes that such
proposed change reasonably establishes
a time frame to the annual shareholder
meeting requirement that is consistent
with the Act, and in particular, Section
15A(b)(6) thereof. The Commission
notes that this change makes explicit
that the annual meeting must be held
within a year of the fiscal year-end of
the company.14 In addition, the
Commission notes that the date a
company holds its annual meeting must
be consistent with state law. The
Commission also notes that the
provision requires those issuers that
must hold an annual shareholder
meeting under NASD Rule 4350(e) to
hold such meetings within a certain
time frame, for the benefit of the
security holders, the investors, and the
public interest, consistent with Section
15A(b)(6) of the Act.15
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
14 The proposed rule text of IM–4350–8 also states
that for a new listing that was not previously
subject to a requirement to hold an annual meeting,
the company is required to hold its first meeting
within one year after its first fiscal year-end
following such listing.
15 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:52 Apr 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
doing and publishes its reasons for so
finding. The Commission hereby finds
good cause for approving Amendment
No. 3 to the proposal, prior to the 30th
day after publishing notice of
Amendment No. 3 in the Federal
Electronic Comments
Register. The revisions made to the
• Use the Commission’s Internet
proposal in Amendment No. 3 are
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
typographical changes intended to
rules/sro.shtml); or
clarify that at the annual shareholder
• Send an e-mail to rulemeeting shareholders must be afforded
comments@sec.gov. Please include File
the opportunity to discuss company
No. SR–NASD–2005–073 on the subject affairs with management. In addition, if
line.
required by the issuer’s governing
documents, shareholders must be
Paper Comments
afforded the opportunity to elect
• Send paper comments in triplicate
directors. This was the intent of the
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
provision as originally proposed. The
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Commission believes that accelerating
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE.,
Amendment No. 3 is appropriate
Washington, DC 20549–1090. All
because these revisions are clarifying
submissions should refer to File
and do not raise new regulatory issues.
Number SR–NASD–2005–073. This file
Accordingly, pursuant to Section
number should be included on the
19(b)(2) of the Act,17 the Commission
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
finds good cause to approve
Commission process and review your
Amendment No. 3 prior to the thirtieth
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will day after notice of the Amendment is
post all comments on the Commission’s published in the Federal Register.
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
V. Conclusion
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
submission, all subsequent
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,18 that the
amendments, all written statements
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
with respect to the proposed rule
NASD–2005–073), as amended, is
change that are filed with the
approved, and Amendment No. 3 to the
Commission, and all written
proposed rule change is hereby granted
communications relating to the
accelerated approval.
proposed rule change between the
For the Commission, by the Division of
Commission and any person, other than
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
those that may be withheld from the
authority.19
public in accordance with the
Nancy M. Morris,
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
Secretary.
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
[FR Doc. E6–5033 Filed 4–5–06; 8:45 am]
Room. Copies of such filing also will be BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the NASD. All
comments received will be posted
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
without change; the Commission does
COMMISSION
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
[Release No. 34–53579; File No. SR–NYSE–
should submit only information that
2006–12]
you wish to make available publicly. All
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
submissions should refer to File
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Number SR–NASD–2005–073 and
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
should be submitted on or before April
Proposed Rule Change and
27, 2006.
Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to
IV. Accelerated Approval of
NYSE Rule 103.12 Regarding Time
Amendment No. 3
Tracking Requirements of Specialists
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
and Clerks
Act,16 the Commission may not approve
March 30, 2006.
any proposed rule change, or
amendment thereto, prior to the 30th
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
day after the date of publication of
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
notice of the filing thereof, unless the
17 Id.
Commission finds good cause for so
arguments concerning Amendment No.
3, including whether Amendment No. 3
is consistent with the Act. Comments
may be submitted by any of the
following methods:
18 Id.
16 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
19 17
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
06APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17532-17534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-5033]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-53578; File No. SR-NASD-2005-073]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto and Notice of Filing and Order Granting
Accelerated Approval of Amendment No. 3 Thereto Relating to Rule
4350(e) To Amend the Annual Shareholder Meeting Requirement
March 30, 2006.
On June 6, 2005, the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. (``NASD''), through its subsidiary, The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
(``Nasdaq''), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend NASD Rule 4350 in order to change its
annual shareholder meeting requirement. On December 5, 2005, Nasdaq
filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\3\ On December 9,
2005, Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change.\4\ The
proposed rule change, as amended, was published for comment in the
Federal Register on December 28, 2005.\5\ No comments were received
regarding the proposal. On March 16, 2006, Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 3
to the proposed rule change.\6\ This order approves the proposed rule
change, as amended, publishes notice of Amendment No. 3 to the proposed
rule change, and grants accelerated approval to Amendment No. 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 3 In Amendment No. 1, Nasdaq revised the proposed rule text
and corresponding description of the proposal in its Form 19b-4.
Amendment No. 1 replaced Nasdaq's original filing in its entirety.
\4\ In Amendment No. 2, Nasdaq made clarifying changes to the
proposed rule text of IM-4350-8 with respect to certain issuers
still subject to the annual shareholder meeting requirement under
NASD Rule 4350(e).
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52985 (December 20,
2005), 70 FR 76895.
\6\ In Amendment No. 3, Nasdaq made further clarifying changes
to the proposed rule text of IM-4350-8 to state that at the annual
shareholder meeting, shareholders must be afforded the opportunity
to discuss company affairs with management and, if required by the
issuer's governing documents, to elect directors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
NASD Rule 4350(e) currently requires all Nasdaq issuers to hold an
annual meeting of shareholders and to provide notice of such meeting to
Nasdaq. Nasdaq recognizes the significance of annual shareholder
meetings because they allow the equity owners of a company--typically
its common stockholders--the opportunity to elect directors and meet
with management to discuss company affairs.
Nasdaq, however, believes that the annual shareholder meeting
requirement is not necessary for, or applicable to, an issuer with
respect to certain types of its listed securities because the holders
of those securities do not directly participate as equity holders and
do not vote in the election of directors. Specifically, Nasdaq makes
reference to securities listed pursuant to NASD Rule 4420(f)
(Quantitative Designation Criteria, Other Securities), which allows for
the listing of securities that possess attributes or features of more
than one category of security.\7\ Nasdaq believes that these securities
typically are not an issuer's primary equity security, and their
holders have only limited economic interests and other rights.
Nasdaq also believes that Portfolio Depository Receipts (listed
pursuant to NASD Rule 4420(i)) and Index Fund Shares (listed pursuant
to NASD Rule 4420(j)), which are securities issued by unit investment
trusts and open-end management investment companies, respectively, that
are organized as exchange-traded funds, should not be required to hold
an annual shareholder meeting. According to Nasdaq, these exchange-
traded funds are generally passive investment vehicles that seek to
match the performance of an index and must obtain an exemptive order
from the Commission before they offer securities. As a result, Nasdaq
notes that the operations of the issuers of these securities are
circumscribed by numerous representations and conditions of the
applicable orders, and that the issuers of these securities do not
typically experience the need for operational or other changes
requiring a shareholder vote, and, by extension, a shareholder meeting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Securities currently listed under Rule 4420(f) include: (i)
Trust Preferred Securities, the payments on which are linked to the
performance of another security; (ii) Index Linked Notes, the
payments on which are linked to the performance of an underlying
index; and (iii) Contingent Value Rights, the performance of which
are tied to the performance of another security, a particular
division of the company, or the occurrence of a certain event.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, Nasdaq would exclude from its annual shareholder meeting
requirement those issuers listing Trust Issued Receipts (listed
pursuant to NASD Rule 4420(l)), which are securities issued by a trust
that holds,
[[Page 17533]]
but does not manage, specific securities on behalf of the investors in
the trust. Nasdaq notes that these trusts do not hold shareholder (or
unitholder) meetings because the trusts have no boards of directors and
essentially serve only as conduits for the investors' indirect
investments in the underlying securities of the trusts.
For the foregoing reasons, Nasdaq proposes to amend NASD Rule
4350(e) such that the requirement to hold an annual shareholder meeting
would be applicable only to those Nasdaq issuers as a result of listing
voting and non-voting common stock and voting preferred stock, and
their respective equivalents. Under the proposal, issuers of securities
listed under NASD Rules 4420(f), 4420(i), 4420(j), and 4420(l) would
specifically be excluded from the annual meeting requirement in
proposed IM-4350-8. The proposal makes clear, however, that issuers of
such securities are still required to hold an annual shareholder
meeting with respect to the listing of common stock or voting preferred
stock, or their equivalents.\8\ By clearly identifying those issuers
that will be subject to the annual shareholder meeting requirement,
Nasdaq believes that NASD Rule 4350(e) will be more transparent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Proposed IM-4350-8 provides that the requirement to hold an
annual shareholder meeting would not be applicable as a result of an
issuer listing the following types of securities: ``securities
listed pursuant to Rule 4420(f) (such as Trust Preferred Securities
and Contingent Value Rights), unless the listed security is a common
stock or voting preferred stock equivalent (e.g., a callable common
stock); Portfolio Depository Receipts listed pursuant to Rule
4420(i); Index Fund Shares listed pursuant to Rule 4420(j); and
Trust Issued Receipts listed pursuant to Rule 4420(l).
Notwithstanding, if the issuer also lists common stock or voting
preferred stock, or their equivalent, the issuer must still hold an
annual meeting for the holders of that common stock or voting
preferred stock, or their equivalent.'' See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 52985 (December 20, 2005), 70 FR 76895, 76896.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, NASD Rule 4350(e) currently requires all Nasdaq
issuers to provide notice of their annual shareholder meetings to
Nasdaq. In practice, however, Nasdaq states that it does not rely on
this notification to monitor compliance with the annual shareholder
meeting requirement. Instead, Nasdaq represents that its staff reviews
proxy statements (and, in the case of issuers that do not file proxy
statements, other Commission filings) to determine compliance. For
these reasons, Nasdaq proposes to further amend NASD Rule 4350(e) to
eliminate the notification requirement.
Finally, while NASD Rule 4350(e) currently does not provide a
deadline for holding the annual shareholder meeting, Nasdaq proposes
that the annual shareholder meeting must be held within one year of the
end of the issuer's fiscal year.\9\ At each such meeting, shareholders
must be afforded the opportunity to discuss company affairs with
management and, if required by the issuer's governing documents, to
elect directors. Nasdaq believes that codifying this time frame would
provide additional transparency to the annual shareholder meeting
requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See infra note 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Discussion and Commission Findings
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national securities association \10\ and, in
particular, the requirements of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act \11\ and
the rules and regulations thereunder. Specifically, the Commission
finds that the proposal to amend the annual shareholder meeting
requirement is consistent with Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act because it
is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
remove impediments to a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest,
and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between issuers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered
the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Applicability of the Annual Shareholder Meeting Requirement
The proposal sets forth which Nasdaq issuers are required to hold
annual shareholder meetings and excludes from the annual shareholder
meeting requirement issuers listing certain types of securities with
respect to which the shareholders typically have a limited
interest.\12\ The Commission notes that Nasdaq's proposed annual
shareholder meeting requirement remains subject to any applicable state
and federal securities laws that relate to such annual meetings; as a
result, an issuer that lists one or more of the types of securities set
forth in proposed IM-4350-8 may still be required to hold annual
shareholder meetings in accordance with such state and federal
securities laws. In addition, the Commission notes that issuers of
Nasdaq-listed securities, including the types of securities set forth
in proposed IM-4350-8, remain subject to state and federal securities
laws that may require other types of shareholder meetings, such as
special meetings of shareholders. For example, exchange-traded funds
are registered under, and remain subject to, the Investment Company Act
of 1940 (``Investment Company Act''), which imposes various
shareholder-voting requirements that may be applicable to such
funds.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ For example, as noted above, shareholders of some of these
securities have a limited economic interest in the issuer and do not
even vote for a board of directors.
\13\ See e.g., Section 16 of the Investment Company Act, which
requires, among others, an investment company's initial board of
directors to be elected by the shareholders at an annual or special
meeting. 15 U.S.C. 80a-16(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposal also clarifies that, under the NASD rules, the right
not to hold an annual shareholder meeting, as set forth in proposed IM-
4350-8, applies only with respect to the particular securities
specified in proposed IM-4350-8. Thus, although the proposed rule
change excludes a particular Nasdaq issuer from holding an annual
shareholder meeting with respect to, and as a result of listing, the
specific type of security specified in proposed IM-4350-8, if such
issuer also lists other common stock or voting preferred-stock, or
their equivalent, such issuer must nevertheless hold an annual meeting
for the holders of that common stock or voting preferred-stock, or
their equivalent, under the proposal. In addition, proposed IM-4350-8
makes clear that issuers listing securities under NASD Rule 4420(f)
(Other Securities), which allows for the listing of Trust Preferred
Securities, Index Linked Notes, and Contingent Value Rights, among
others, will still be subject to the annual shareholder meeting
requirement, irrespective of whether such securities are listed under
NASD Rule 4420(f), if such securities have the attributes of common
stock or voting preferred stock, or their equivalents.
Given the limited rights and other interests of the holders of
those securities specified in proposed IM-4350-8 and the applicability
of federal and state securities laws that govern shareholder meetings,
the Commission believes that the proposed rule change reasonably sets
forth the scope of the annual shareholder meeting requirement and will
ensure that the appropriate Nasdaq-listed companies are required to
hold annual shareholder meetings under NASD rules, for the benefit of
investors and the public interest.
[[Page 17534]]
B. Notification of the Annual Shareholder Meeting
With respect to Nasdaq's proposal to eliminate the notice
requirement in NASD Rule 4350(e), the Commission believes that, because
Nasdaq's practice to monitor the annual shareholder meeting requirement
involves the review of proxy statements and other Commission filings,
the current notification requirement is redundant and its elimination
from NASD Rule 4350(e) would be reasonable. Of course, Nasdaq will
still be required to ensure compliance with the annual shareholder
meeting requirement and is simply eliminating a notification
requirement which Nasdaq claims is not necessary. The proposed change
would be consistent with Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act because the
elimination of a redundancy and an unnecessary obligation of Nasdaq
issuers removes impediments to the mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, while continuing to ensure the protection
of investors and the public interest.
C. Timing of the Annual Shareholder Meeting
Finally, the provision concerning the holding of an annual meeting
is being amended to require that the annual meeting must be held within
one year after the end of the fiscal year. The Commission believes that
such proposed change reasonably establishes a time frame to the annual
shareholder meeting requirement that is consistent with the Act, and in
particular, Section 15A(b)(6) thereof. The Commission notes that this
change makes explicit that the annual meeting must be held within a
year of the fiscal year-end of the company.\14\ In addition, the
Commission notes that the date a company holds its annual meeting must
be consistent with state law. The Commission also notes that the
provision requires those issuers that must hold an annual shareholder
meeting under NASD Rule 4350(e) to hold such meetings within a certain
time frame, for the benefit of the security holders, the investors, and
the public interest, consistent with Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The proposed rule text of IM-4350-8 also states that for a
new listing that was not previously subject to a requirement to hold
an annual meeting, the company is required to hold its first meeting
within one year after its first fiscal year-end following such
listing.
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning Amendment No. 3, including whether Amendment No. 3
is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the
following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File No. SR-NASD-2005-073 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NASD-2005-073. This file number should be included on
the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and
review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all
subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the
proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all
written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public
Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the NASD. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2005-073 and should be
submitted on or before April 27, 2006.
IV. Accelerated Approval of Amendment No. 3
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\16\ the Commission may not
approve any proposed rule change, or amendment thereto, prior to the
30th day after the date of publication of notice of the filing thereof,
unless the Commission finds good cause for so doing and publishes its
reasons for so finding. The Commission hereby finds good cause for
approving Amendment No. 3 to the proposal, prior to the 30th day after
publishing notice of Amendment No. 3 in the Federal Register. The
revisions made to the proposal in Amendment No. 3 are typographical
changes intended to clarify that at the annual shareholder meeting
shareholders must be afforded the opportunity to discuss company
affairs with management. In addition, if required by the issuer's
governing documents, shareholders must be afforded the opportunity to
elect directors. This was the intent of the provision as originally
proposed. The Commission believes that accelerating Amendment No. 3 is
appropriate because these revisions are clarifying and do not raise new
regulatory issues. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\17\ the Commission finds good cause to approve Amendment No. 3
prior to the thirtieth day after notice of the Amendment is published
in the Federal Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\17\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\18\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-NASD-2005-073), as
amended, is approved, and Amendment No. 3 to the proposed rule change
is hereby granted accelerated approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Id.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-5033 Filed 4-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P