In the Matter of Certain Digital Processors and Digital Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 17136 [E6-4936]

Download as PDF 17136 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 5, 2006 / Notices FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martin Bonorden, Cadastral Surveyor, Branch of Cadastral Survey, Bureau of Land Management, 5001 Southgate Drive, Billings, Montana, 59101–4669, telephone (701) 227–7730 or (406) 896– 5009. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was executed at the request of the Crow Agency, through the Rocky Mountain Regional Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, and was necessary to determine Trust and Tribal land. The lands we surveyed are: Principal Meridian, Montana Tps. 3 and 4 S., Rs. 32 E. The plat, in one sheet, representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the north boundary, a portion of the subdivisional lines (including Township 3 South, Range 32 East), a portion of the subdivision of section 2, and the adjusted original meanders of the former right bank of the Big Horn River, through section 2 (and the south half of section 35, Township 3 South, Range 32 East), the subdivision of section 2, and the survey of the meanders of the present right bank of the Big Horn River, through section 2, and certain division of accretion lines in section 2, Townships 3 and 4 South, Range 32 East, Principal Meridian, Montana, was accepted March 27, 2006. We will place copies of the plat, in one sheet, and related field notes we described in the open files. They will be available to the public as a matter of information. If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the plat, in one sheet, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing pending our consideration of the protest. We will not officially file this plat, in one sheet, until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, including decisions or appeals. Dated: March 30, 2006. Thomas M. Deiling, Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Resources. [FR Doc. E6–4918 Filed 4–4–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–$$–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES [Investigation No. 337–TA–559] In the Matter of Certain Digital Processors and Digital Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant’s Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:34 Apr 04, 2006 Jkt 208001 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting complainant’s motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Walters, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5468. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted on January 9, 2006, based on a complaint filed by Biax Corporation (‘‘Biax’’) of Boulder, Colorado. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain digital processors or digital processing systems, components thereof, or products containing the same by reason of infringement of various claims of United States Patent Nos. 5,021,945, 5,517,628, and 6,253,313. The complaint named four respondents: Philips Semiconductors B.V. of the Netherlands; Philips Consumer Electronics Services B.V. of the Netherlands; Philips Consumer Electronics North America Corp. of Atlanta, Georgia; and 2Wire, Inc. of San Jose, California. On February 3, 2006, Biax moved to amend the complaint and notice of investigation in order to remove respondent Philips Consumer Electronics North America Corp. and to add Philips Electronics North America Corp. Biax requested the switch because it recently learned that Philips Consumer Electronics North America Corp. is not an independent legal entity, but rather is a division of proposed PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 respondent Philips Electronics North America Corp. None of the respondents nor the Commission investigative attorney opposed Biax’s motion. On March 1, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID granting Biax’s motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation. The ALJ found that, pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.14(b)(1)), there was good cause to amend the complaint and notice of investigation in order to remove respondent Philips Consumer Electronics North America Corp. and to add Philips Electronics North America Corp. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. Having examined the record of this investigation, the Commission has determined not to review the ALJ’s ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). By order of the Commission. Issued: March 30, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–4936 Filed 4–4–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–523] In the Matter of Certain Optical Disk Controller Chips, and Chipsets and Products Containing, Same, Including Dvd Players and Pc Optical, Storage Devices II; Notice of Commission Decisions: To Grant Joint Motions To Terminate the Investigation as to All Respondents on the Basis of Settlement Agreements; To Grant-inPart and Deny-in-Part Requests To Vacate a Final Initial Determination; To Grant a Motion for Leave To File Corrected Versions of a Joint Motion To Terminate; To Deny Motions for Leave To File Reply; To Deny a Petition for Reconsideration U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to grant joint motions to terminate the abovecaptioned investigation as to all respondents on the basis of settlement agreements. The Commission has also granted-in-part and denied-in-part the E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM 05APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 17136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-4936]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-559]


In the Matter of Certain Digital Processors and Digital 
Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; 
Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination 
Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') 
granting complainant's motion to amend the complaint and notice of 
investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Walters, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted on January 
9, 2006, based on a complaint filed by Biax Corporation (``Biax'') of 
Boulder, Colorado. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of 
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the 
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United 
States after importation of certain digital processors or digital 
processing systems, components thereof, or products containing the same 
by reason of infringement of various claims of United States Patent 
Nos. 5,021,945, 5,517,628, and 6,253,313. The complaint named four 
respondents: Philips Semiconductors B.V. of the Netherlands; Philips 
Consumer Electronics Services B.V. of the Netherlands; Philips Consumer 
Electronics North America Corp. of Atlanta, Georgia; and 2Wire, Inc. of 
San Jose, California.
    On February 3, 2006, Biax moved to amend the complaint and notice 
of investigation in order to remove respondent Philips Consumer 
Electronics North America Corp. and to add Philips Electronics North 
America Corp. Biax requested the switch because it recently learned 
that Philips Consumer Electronics North America Corp. is not an 
independent legal entity, but rather is a division of proposed 
respondent Philips Electronics North America Corp. None of the 
respondents nor the Commission investigative attorney opposed Biax's 
motion.
    On March 1, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID granting Biax's motion to 
amend the complaint and notice of investigation. The ALJ found that, 
pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.14(b)(1)), there 
was good cause to amend the complaint and notice of investigation in 
order to remove respondent Philips Consumer Electronics North America 
Corp. and to add Philips Electronics North America Corp. No petitions 
for review of the ID were filed. Having examined the record of this 
investigation, the Commission has determined not to review the ALJ's 
ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.42).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 30, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-4936 Filed 4-4-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.