In the Matter of Systems for Detecting and Removing Viruses or Worms, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Consolidated Enforcement and Advisory Opinion Proceeding, 16827-16828 [06-3215]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 4, 2006 / Notices
Greene County
Springfield Public Square Historic District,
(Springfield, Missouri MPS AD) 149, 138,
137, 134, 127, 132, 124, and 122 Park
Central Sq., 219, 221, South Ave.,
Springfield, 06000331
Caroline County
Auburn, 320 N. Main St., Bowling Green,
06000342
Fairfax County
Tower House, 9066 Tower House Place,
Alexandria, 06000341
MISSOURI
St. Louis County
Burkhardt Historic District (Boundary
Increase), 16626–16660 (Even numbered
properties only) Chesterfield Airport Rd.,
Chesterfield, 06000330
Warren County
Fortmann, Herman H., Building, 207 Depot
St., Marthasville, 06000332
MONTANA
Yellowstone County
Billings Townsite Historic District (Boundary
Increase), 2600 (2528), 2604–2606, 2608,
2610–2614, and 2624 Montana Ave.,
Billings, 06000333
NEW YORK
Orange County
Bodine Farmhouse, 50 Wallkill Rd., Walden,
06000334
Westchester County
Catt, Carrie Chapman, House, 20 Ryder Rd.,
Briarcliff Manor, 06000336
Nelson Avenue—Fort Hill Historic District,
Roughtly along Nelson Ave., John St.,
Diven St., Constant St., Orchard St.,
Pauling St., and Decatur Ave., Peekskill,
06000335
NORTH CAROLINA
Chowan County
Jones, Cullen and Elizabeth, House, 2732
Rocky Hock Rd., Edenton, 06000340
Rose Hill, W side of U.S. 401 S, 0.25 mi. N
of NC 1110, Louisburg, 06000339
Wake County
Maiden Lane Historic District, 2–20 Maiden
Ln., Raleigh, 06000338
TENNESSEE
Hawkins County
King George County
Bunche, Ralph, High School, 10139 James
Madison Hwy., King George, 06000353
Williamson County
Harlinsdale Farm, (Historic Family Farms in
Middle Tennessee MPS) 239 Franklin Rd.,
Franklin, 06000344
Arlington County
Westover Historic District, (Garden
Apartments, Apartment Houses and
Apartment Complexes in Arlington
County, Virginia MPS) Bounded by
McKinley Rd., N. Washington Blvd., N.
16th St., N. Jefferson St., N. 11th St. and
N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, 06000345
18:55 Apr 03, 2006
Jkt 208001
KENTUCKY
Jefferson County
Stephen Foster Elementary School, 4020
Garland Ave., Louisville, 06000337
[FR Doc. E6–4851 Filed 4–3–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–51–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Nelson County
Edgewood, 3008 Warminster Rd., Wingina,
06000354
Mitchell’s Brick House Tavern, 5365 Thomas
Nelson Hwy., Arrington, 06000355
In the Matter of Systems for Detecting
and Removing Viruses or Worms,
Components Thereof, and Products
Containing Same; Consolidated
Enforcement and Advisory Opinion
Proceeding
Richmond Independent City
Fraternal Order of Eagles Building, 220 E.
Marshall St., Richmond (Independent
City), 06000346
Hebrew Cemetery, 400 Hospital St.,
Richmond (Independent City), 06000348
Lock Lane Apartments,
12–58 West Lock Ln., 11–19 and 27–57
East Lock Ln., and 4701 Grove Ave.,
Richmond (Independent City), 06000347
Richmond and Chesapeake Bay Railway Car
Barn, 1620 Brook Rd., Richmond
(Independent City), 06000349
Salem Independent City
Preston House (Boundary Increase and
Decrease), 1936 W. Main St., Salem
(Independent City), 06000357
A request for a move has been made for the
following resource:
Jefferson County
Boone-Murphy House 714 W. 4th Ave., Pine
Bluff, 79000442
A request for removal have been made for
the following resources:
ARIZONA
VIRGINIA
Rohrig School (Tempe MRA), 2328 E.
University Dr., Tempe, 84000175
Tempe Cotton Exchange Cotton Gin Seed
Storage Building (Tempe MRA), 215 W. 7th
St., Tempe, 84000744
West End Hotel (Phoenix Commercial MRA),
701 W. Washington, Phoenix, 85002897
To assist in the preservation of the
following resource the 15-day comment
period has been waived:
Loudoun County
Paeonian Springs Historic District, Area inc.
parts of Berry Bramble Ln., Catoctin Ridge
St., Charles Town Pike, Highland Circle,
and Simpson Circle, Paeonian Springs,
06000352
ARKANSAS
Moore Family Farm, 483 VFW Rd., Bulls
Gap, 06000343
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Giles County
Shannon Cemetery, Jct. of VA 42 and 100,
Pearisburg, 06000350
Rockbridge County
Glasgow Historic District (Boundary
Increase), 900 Blks of Fizlee St. and
Rockbridge Rd., Glasgow, 06000351
Franklin County
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Frederick County
Fort Collier, One mile N of Winchester on VA
11, Winchester, 06000356
16827
Maricopa County
Green, Mary and Moses, House (Tempe
MRA), W of Carver St., Tempe, 85000406
Miller Block (Tempe MRA) 417–422 Mill
Ave., Tempe, 84000727
Miranda, Jesus, Homestead (Tempe MRA),
1992 E. University, Tempe, 84000729
Peterson Building, 409–413 S. Mill Ave,
Tempe, 80000766
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Inv. No. 337–TA–510]
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
issued by the presiding administrative
law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the
above-captioned proceeding. The
Commission has also determined to
rescind the limited exclusion and cease
and desist orders previously issued in
the underlying investigation and to
vacate a summary ID previously issued
in the proceeding.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean
Jackson, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–
205–3104. Copies of the public version
of the ID and all nonconfidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that
information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. General information
concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server
E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM
04APN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
16828
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 4, 2006 / Notices
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
investigation was instituted by the
Commission on June 3, 2004, based on
a complaint filed by Trend Micro Inc.
(‘‘Trend Micro’’) of Cupertino,
California under section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337. 69 FR
32044–45 (June 8, 2004). The complaint
alleged violations of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation into the United
States, or the sale within the United
States after importation of certain
systems for detecting and removing
computer viruses or worms,
components thereof, and products
containing same by reason of
infringement of claims 1–22 of U.S.
Patent No. 5,623,600 (‘‘the ‘600 patent’’).
The notice of investigation named
Fortinet, Inc., of Sunnyvale, California
(‘‘Fortinet’’) as the sole respondent.
On May 9, 2005, the ALJ issued his
final ID in this investigation finding a
violation of section 337 based on his
findings that claims 4, 7, 8, and 11–15
of the ‘600 patent are not invalid or
unenforceable, and are infringed by
respondent’s products. On July 8, 2005,
the Commission issued notice that it
had determined not to review the ALJ’s
final ID on violation, thereby finding a
violation of section 337. 70 FR 40731
(July 14, 2005). The Commission also
requested briefing on the issues of
remedy, the public interest, and
bonding. Id. Submissions on the issues
of remedy, the public interest, and
bonding were filed by all parties. On
August 8, 2005, the Commission
terminated the investigation, and issued
a limited exclusion order and a cease
and desist order covering respondent’s
systems for detecting and removing
computer viruses or worms,
components thereof, and products
containing same that infringe claims 4,
7, 8, and 11–15 of the ‘600 patent.
On September 13, 2005, complainant
Trend Micro filed a complaint for
enforcement of the Commission’s
remedial orders. On October 7, 2005, the
Commission determined to institute a
formal enforcement proceeding to
determine whether Fortinet was in
violation of the Commission’s cease and
desist order issued in the investigation
and what, if any, enforcement measures
were appropriate. 70 FR 76076
(December 22, 2005).
On October 26, 2005, Fortinet filed a
request for an advisory opinion under
Commission rule 210.79, 19 CFR 210.79,
that would declare that Fortinet’s anti-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:55 Apr 03, 2006
Jkt 208001
virus ‘‘FortiGate’’ products
incorporating Fortinet’s newly
redesigned anti-virus software does not
infringe claims 4, 7, 8, and 11–15 of the
‘600 patent and, therefore, is not
covered by the Commission’s cease and
desist and limited exclusion orders,
issued on August 8, 2005. On December
16, 2005, the Commission determined to
institute an advisory opinion
proceeding to determine whether
Fortinet’s redesigned anti-virus software
infringes the asserted claims of the ‘600
patent.
On January 11, 2006, the presiding
ALJ consolidated the enforcement
proceeding and advisory opinion
proceeding.
On December 16, 2005, Trend Micro
moved for summary determination that
Fortinet had violated sections III(B),
III(D), and III(E) of the cease and desist
order. On January 12, 2006, the ALJ
issued an ID (Order No. 26) granting
Trend Micro’s motion for summary
determination that Fortinet violated
section III(B) of the cease and desist
order. On February 9, 2006, the
Commission determined not to review
Order No. 26.
On December 21, 2005, Fortinet filed
a request for an additional advisory
opinion concerning the so-called
Clearswift license, which it later
withdrew on February 15, 2006.
On January 27, 2006, Trend Micro and
Fortinet entered into a settlement
agreement that resolves their dispute
before the Commission. On February 14,
2006, Trend Micro and Fortinet filed a
joint motion to terminate the
consolidated proceedings on the basis of
the settlement agreement. The joint
motion included a petition to rescind
the limited exclusion and cease and
desist orders issued in the investigation,
and a petition to vacate Order No. 26.
On February 27, 2006, the Commission
investigative attorney filed a response in
support of the joint motion to terminate
and in support of the joint petitions to
rescind the limited exclusion and cease
and desist orders and to vacate Order
No. 26.
On February 28, 2006, the ALJ issued
an ID (Order No. 31) granting the joint
motion to terminate the consolidated
enforcement and advisory opinion
proceedings based on the settlement
agreement. The ALJ also recommended
that the Commission rescind the limited
exclusion order and cease and desist
order issued in the investigation and
vacate Order No. 26. No party petitioned
for review of the ID.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID granting the
parties’ joint motion to terminate the
consolidated enforcement and advisory
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
opinion proceeding. Additionally, the
Commission has determined that the
parties’ settlement agreement satisfies
the requirement of section 337(k) and
Commission rule 210.76(a)(1), 19 CFR
210.76(a)(1), for changed conditions of
fact or law and has therefore issued an
order rescinding the limited exclusion
order and cease and desist order
previously issued by the Commission in
the underlying investigation. Finally, in
view of specific terms in the settlement
agreement, the Commission has
determined to vacate Order No. 26.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
sections 210.42 and 210.76 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42 and 210.76).
Issued: March 29, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06–3215 Filed 4–3–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Community Oriented Policing
Services; Agency Information
Collection Activities: Revision of a
Currently Approved Collection;
Comments Requested
30-day notice of information
collection under review: COPS
Extension Request Form.
ACTION:
The Department of Justice (DOJ)
Office of Community Oriented Policing
Services (COPS) has submitted the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The revision of
a currently approved information
collection is published to obtain
comments from the public and affected
agencies.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
for 30 days for public comment until
May 4, 2006. This process is conducted
in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
If you have comments especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Rebekah Dorr,
Department of Justice Office of
Community Oriented Policing Services,
1100 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM
04APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 4, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16827-16828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3215]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-510]
In the Matter of Systems for Detecting and Removing Viruses or
Worms, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Consolidated
Enforcement and Advisory Opinion Proceeding
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'')
terminating the above-captioned proceeding. The Commission has also
determined to rescind the limited exclusion and cease and desist orders
previously issued in the underlying investigation and to vacate a
summary ID previously issued in the proceeding.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Jackson, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3104. Copies of the public
version of the ID and all nonconfidential documents filed in connection
with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing-impaired persons
are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. General
information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing
its Internet server
[[Page 16828]]
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted by the
Commission on June 3, 2004, based on a complaint filed by Trend Micro
Inc. (``Trend Micro'') of Cupertino, California under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337. 69 FR 32044-45 (June 8, 2004).
The complaint alleged violations of section 337 in the importation into
the United States, the sale for importation into the United States, or
the sale within the United States after importation of certain systems
for detecting and removing computer viruses or worms, components
thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of
claims 1-22 of U.S. Patent No. 5,623,600 (``the `600 patent''). The
notice of investigation named Fortinet, Inc., of Sunnyvale, California
(``Fortinet'') as the sole respondent.
On May 9, 2005, the ALJ issued his final ID in this investigation
finding a violation of section 337 based on his findings that claims 4,
7, 8, and 11-15 of the `600 patent are not invalid or unenforceable,
and are infringed by respondent's products. On July 8, 2005, the
Commission issued notice that it had determined not to review the ALJ's
final ID on violation, thereby finding a violation of section 337. 70
FR 40731 (July 14, 2005). The Commission also requested briefing on the
issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. Id. Submissions on
the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding were filed by
all parties. On August 8, 2005, the Commission terminated the
investigation, and issued a limited exclusion order and a cease and
desist order covering respondent's systems for detecting and removing
computer viruses or worms, components thereof, and products containing
same that infringe claims 4, 7, 8, and 11-15 of the `600 patent.
On September 13, 2005, complainant Trend Micro filed a complaint
for enforcement of the Commission's remedial orders. On October 7,
2005, the Commission determined to institute a formal enforcement
proceeding to determine whether Fortinet was in violation of the
Commission's cease and desist order issued in the investigation and
what, if any, enforcement measures were appropriate. 70 FR 76076
(December 22, 2005).
On October 26, 2005, Fortinet filed a request for an advisory
opinion under Commission rule 210.79, 19 CFR 210.79, that would declare
that Fortinet's anti-virus ``FortiGate'' products incorporating
Fortinet's newly redesigned anti-virus software does not infringe
claims 4, 7, 8, and 11-15 of the `600 patent and, therefore, is not
covered by the Commission's cease and desist and limited exclusion
orders, issued on August 8, 2005. On December 16, 2005, the Commission
determined to institute an advisory opinion proceeding to determine
whether Fortinet's redesigned anti-virus software infringes the
asserted claims of the `600 patent.
On January 11, 2006, the presiding ALJ consolidated the enforcement
proceeding and advisory opinion proceeding.
On December 16, 2005, Trend Micro moved for summary determination
that Fortinet had violated sections III(B), III(D), and III(E) of the
cease and desist order. On January 12, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID
(Order No. 26) granting Trend Micro's motion for summary determination
that Fortinet violated section III(B) of the cease and desist order. On
February 9, 2006, the Commission determined not to review Order No. 26.
On December 21, 2005, Fortinet filed a request for an additional
advisory opinion concerning the so-called Clearswift license, which it
later withdrew on February 15, 2006.
On January 27, 2006, Trend Micro and Fortinet entered into a
settlement agreement that resolves their dispute before the Commission.
On February 14, 2006, Trend Micro and Fortinet filed a joint motion to
terminate the consolidated proceedings on the basis of the settlement
agreement. The joint motion included a petition to rescind the limited
exclusion and cease and desist orders issued in the investigation, and
a petition to vacate Order No. 26. On February 27, 2006, the Commission
investigative attorney filed a response in support of the joint motion
to terminate and in support of the joint petitions to rescind the
limited exclusion and cease and desist orders and to vacate Order No.
26.
On February 28, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 31) granting
the joint motion to terminate the consolidated enforcement and advisory
opinion proceedings based on the settlement agreement. The ALJ also
recommended that the Commission rescind the limited exclusion order and
cease and desist order issued in the investigation and vacate Order No.
26. No party petitioned for review of the ID.
The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID granting
the parties' joint motion to terminate the consolidated enforcement and
advisory opinion proceeding. Additionally, the Commission has
determined that the parties' settlement agreement satisfies the
requirement of section 337(k) and Commission rule 210.76(a)(1), 19 CFR
210.76(a)(1), for changed conditions of fact or law and has therefore
issued an order rescinding the limited exclusion order and cease and
desist order previously issued by the Commission in the underlying
investigation. Finally, in view of specific terms in the settlement
agreement, the Commission has determined to vacate Order No. 26.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in sections 210.42 and 210.76 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42 and 210.76).
Issued: March 29, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-3215 Filed 4-3-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P