In the Matter of Systems for Detecting and Removing Viruses or Worms, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Consolidated Enforcement and Advisory Opinion Proceeding, 16827-16828 [06-3215]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 4, 2006 / Notices Greene County Springfield Public Square Historic District, (Springfield, Missouri MPS AD) 149, 138, 137, 134, 127, 132, 124, and 122 Park Central Sq., 219, 221, South Ave., Springfield, 06000331 Caroline County Auburn, 320 N. Main St., Bowling Green, 06000342 Fairfax County Tower House, 9066 Tower House Place, Alexandria, 06000341 MISSOURI St. Louis County Burkhardt Historic District (Boundary Increase), 16626–16660 (Even numbered properties only) Chesterfield Airport Rd., Chesterfield, 06000330 Warren County Fortmann, Herman H., Building, 207 Depot St., Marthasville, 06000332 MONTANA Yellowstone County Billings Townsite Historic District (Boundary Increase), 2600 (2528), 2604–2606, 2608, 2610–2614, and 2624 Montana Ave., Billings, 06000333 NEW YORK Orange County Bodine Farmhouse, 50 Wallkill Rd., Walden, 06000334 Westchester County Catt, Carrie Chapman, House, 20 Ryder Rd., Briarcliff Manor, 06000336 Nelson Avenue—Fort Hill Historic District, Roughtly along Nelson Ave., John St., Diven St., Constant St., Orchard St., Pauling St., and Decatur Ave., Peekskill, 06000335 NORTH CAROLINA Chowan County Jones, Cullen and Elizabeth, House, 2732 Rocky Hock Rd., Edenton, 06000340 Rose Hill, W side of U.S. 401 S, 0.25 mi. N of NC 1110, Louisburg, 06000339 Wake County Maiden Lane Historic District, 2–20 Maiden Ln., Raleigh, 06000338 TENNESSEE Hawkins County King George County Bunche, Ralph, High School, 10139 James Madison Hwy., King George, 06000353 Williamson County Harlinsdale Farm, (Historic Family Farms in Middle Tennessee MPS) 239 Franklin Rd., Franklin, 06000344 Arlington County Westover Historic District, (Garden Apartments, Apartment Houses and Apartment Complexes in Arlington County, Virginia MPS) Bounded by McKinley Rd., N. Washington Blvd., N. 16th St., N. Jefferson St., N. 11th St. and N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, 06000345 18:55 Apr 03, 2006 Jkt 208001 KENTUCKY Jefferson County Stephen Foster Elementary School, 4020 Garland Ave., Louisville, 06000337 [FR Doc. E6–4851 Filed 4–3–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–51–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Nelson County Edgewood, 3008 Warminster Rd., Wingina, 06000354 Mitchell’s Brick House Tavern, 5365 Thomas Nelson Hwy., Arrington, 06000355 In the Matter of Systems for Detecting and Removing Viruses or Worms, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Consolidated Enforcement and Advisory Opinion Proceeding Richmond Independent City Fraternal Order of Eagles Building, 220 E. Marshall St., Richmond (Independent City), 06000346 Hebrew Cemetery, 400 Hospital St., Richmond (Independent City), 06000348 Lock Lane Apartments, 12–58 West Lock Ln., 11–19 and 27–57 East Lock Ln., and 4701 Grove Ave., Richmond (Independent City), 06000347 Richmond and Chesapeake Bay Railway Car Barn, 1620 Brook Rd., Richmond (Independent City), 06000349 Salem Independent City Preston House (Boundary Increase and Decrease), 1936 W. Main St., Salem (Independent City), 06000357 A request for a move has been made for the following resource: Jefferson County Boone-Murphy House 714 W. 4th Ave., Pine Bluff, 79000442 A request for removal have been made for the following resources: ARIZONA VIRGINIA Rohrig School (Tempe MRA), 2328 E. University Dr., Tempe, 84000175 Tempe Cotton Exchange Cotton Gin Seed Storage Building (Tempe MRA), 215 W. 7th St., Tempe, 84000744 West End Hotel (Phoenix Commercial MRA), 701 W. Washington, Phoenix, 85002897 To assist in the preservation of the following resource the 15-day comment period has been waived: Loudoun County Paeonian Springs Historic District, Area inc. parts of Berry Bramble Ln., Catoctin Ridge St., Charles Town Pike, Highland Circle, and Simpson Circle, Paeonian Springs, 06000352 ARKANSAS Moore Family Farm, 483 VFW Rd., Bulls Gap, 06000343 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Giles County Shannon Cemetery, Jct. of VA 42 and 100, Pearisburg, 06000350 Rockbridge County Glasgow Historic District (Boundary Increase), 900 Blks of Fizlee St. and Rockbridge Rd., Glasgow, 06000351 Franklin County VerDate Aug<31>2005 Frederick County Fort Collier, One mile N of Winchester on VA 11, Winchester, 06000356 16827 Maricopa County Green, Mary and Moses, House (Tempe MRA), W of Carver St., Tempe, 85000406 Miller Block (Tempe MRA) 417–422 Mill Ave., Tempe, 84000727 Miranda, Jesus, Homestead (Tempe MRA), 1992 E. University, Tempe, 84000729 Peterson Building, 409–413 S. Mill Ave, Tempe, 80000766 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [Inv. No. 337–TA–510] U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the above-captioned proceeding. The Commission has also determined to rescind the limited exclusion and cease and desist orders previously issued in the underlying investigation and to vacate a summary ID previously issued in the proceeding. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Jackson, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 205–3104. Copies of the public version of the ID and all nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM 04APN1 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 16828 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 4, 2006 / Notices (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted by the Commission on June 3, 2004, based on a complaint filed by Trend Micro Inc. (‘‘Trend Micro’’) of Cupertino, California under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337. 69 FR 32044–45 (June 8, 2004). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation into the United States, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain systems for detecting and removing computer viruses or worms, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of claims 1–22 of U.S. Patent No. 5,623,600 (‘‘the ‘600 patent’’). The notice of investigation named Fortinet, Inc., of Sunnyvale, California (‘‘Fortinet’’) as the sole respondent. On May 9, 2005, the ALJ issued his final ID in this investigation finding a violation of section 337 based on his findings that claims 4, 7, 8, and 11–15 of the ‘600 patent are not invalid or unenforceable, and are infringed by respondent’s products. On July 8, 2005, the Commission issued notice that it had determined not to review the ALJ’s final ID on violation, thereby finding a violation of section 337. 70 FR 40731 (July 14, 2005). The Commission also requested briefing on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. Id. Submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding were filed by all parties. On August 8, 2005, the Commission terminated the investigation, and issued a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order covering respondent’s systems for detecting and removing computer viruses or worms, components thereof, and products containing same that infringe claims 4, 7, 8, and 11–15 of the ‘600 patent. On September 13, 2005, complainant Trend Micro filed a complaint for enforcement of the Commission’s remedial orders. On October 7, 2005, the Commission determined to institute a formal enforcement proceeding to determine whether Fortinet was in violation of the Commission’s cease and desist order issued in the investigation and what, if any, enforcement measures were appropriate. 70 FR 76076 (December 22, 2005). On October 26, 2005, Fortinet filed a request for an advisory opinion under Commission rule 210.79, 19 CFR 210.79, that would declare that Fortinet’s anti- VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:55 Apr 03, 2006 Jkt 208001 virus ‘‘FortiGate’’ products incorporating Fortinet’s newly redesigned anti-virus software does not infringe claims 4, 7, 8, and 11–15 of the ‘600 patent and, therefore, is not covered by the Commission’s cease and desist and limited exclusion orders, issued on August 8, 2005. On December 16, 2005, the Commission determined to institute an advisory opinion proceeding to determine whether Fortinet’s redesigned anti-virus software infringes the asserted claims of the ‘600 patent. On January 11, 2006, the presiding ALJ consolidated the enforcement proceeding and advisory opinion proceeding. On December 16, 2005, Trend Micro moved for summary determination that Fortinet had violated sections III(B), III(D), and III(E) of the cease and desist order. On January 12, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 26) granting Trend Micro’s motion for summary determination that Fortinet violated section III(B) of the cease and desist order. On February 9, 2006, the Commission determined not to review Order No. 26. On December 21, 2005, Fortinet filed a request for an additional advisory opinion concerning the so-called Clearswift license, which it later withdrew on February 15, 2006. On January 27, 2006, Trend Micro and Fortinet entered into a settlement agreement that resolves their dispute before the Commission. On February 14, 2006, Trend Micro and Fortinet filed a joint motion to terminate the consolidated proceedings on the basis of the settlement agreement. The joint motion included a petition to rescind the limited exclusion and cease and desist orders issued in the investigation, and a petition to vacate Order No. 26. On February 27, 2006, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the joint motion to terminate and in support of the joint petitions to rescind the limited exclusion and cease and desist orders and to vacate Order No. 26. On February 28, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 31) granting the joint motion to terminate the consolidated enforcement and advisory opinion proceedings based on the settlement agreement. The ALJ also recommended that the Commission rescind the limited exclusion order and cease and desist order issued in the investigation and vacate Order No. 26. No party petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID granting the parties’ joint motion to terminate the consolidated enforcement and advisory PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 opinion proceeding. Additionally, the Commission has determined that the parties’ settlement agreement satisfies the requirement of section 337(k) and Commission rule 210.76(a)(1), 19 CFR 210.76(a)(1), for changed conditions of fact or law and has therefore issued an order rescinding the limited exclusion order and cease and desist order previously issued by the Commission in the underlying investigation. Finally, in view of specific terms in the settlement agreement, the Commission has determined to vacate Order No. 26. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.42 and 210.76 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42 and 210.76). Issued: March 29, 2006. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 06–3215 Filed 4–3–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of Community Oriented Policing Services; Agency Information Collection Activities: Revision of a Currently Approved Collection; Comments Requested 30-day notice of information collection under review: COPS Extension Request Form. ACTION: The Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) has submitted the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The revision of a currently approved information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 30 days for public comment until May 4, 2006. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Rebekah Dorr, Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, 1100 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20530. E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM 04APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 4, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16827-16828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3215]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-510]


In the Matter of Systems for Detecting and Removing Viruses or 
Worms, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Consolidated 
Enforcement and Advisory Opinion Proceeding

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') 
terminating the above-captioned proceeding. The Commission has also 
determined to rescind the limited exclusion and cease and desist orders 
previously issued in the underlying investigation and to vacate a 
summary ID previously issued in the proceeding.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Jackson, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3104. Copies of the public 
version of the ID and all nonconfidential documents filed in connection 
with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during 
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing-impaired persons 
are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by 
contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. General 
information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing 
its Internet server

[[Page 16828]]

(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted by the 
Commission on June 3, 2004, based on a complaint filed by Trend Micro 
Inc. (``Trend Micro'') of Cupertino, California under section 337 of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337. 69 FR 32044-45 (June 8, 2004). 
The complaint alleged violations of section 337 in the importation into 
the United States, the sale for importation into the United States, or 
the sale within the United States after importation of certain systems 
for detecting and removing computer viruses or worms, components 
thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of 
claims 1-22 of U.S. Patent No. 5,623,600 (``the `600 patent''). The 
notice of investigation named Fortinet, Inc., of Sunnyvale, California 
(``Fortinet'') as the sole respondent.
    On May 9, 2005, the ALJ issued his final ID in this investigation 
finding a violation of section 337 based on his findings that claims 4, 
7, 8, and 11-15 of the `600 patent are not invalid or unenforceable, 
and are infringed by respondent's products. On July 8, 2005, the 
Commission issued notice that it had determined not to review the ALJ's 
final ID on violation, thereby finding a violation of section 337. 70 
FR 40731 (July 14, 2005). The Commission also requested briefing on the 
issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. Id. Submissions on 
the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding were filed by 
all parties. On August 8, 2005, the Commission terminated the 
investigation, and issued a limited exclusion order and a cease and 
desist order covering respondent's systems for detecting and removing 
computer viruses or worms, components thereof, and products containing 
same that infringe claims 4, 7, 8, and 11-15 of the `600 patent.
    On September 13, 2005, complainant Trend Micro filed a complaint 
for enforcement of the Commission's remedial orders. On October 7, 
2005, the Commission determined to institute a formal enforcement 
proceeding to determine whether Fortinet was in violation of the 
Commission's cease and desist order issued in the investigation and 
what, if any, enforcement measures were appropriate. 70 FR 76076 
(December 22, 2005).
    On October 26, 2005, Fortinet filed a request for an advisory 
opinion under Commission rule 210.79, 19 CFR 210.79, that would declare 
that Fortinet's anti-virus ``FortiGate'' products incorporating 
Fortinet's newly redesigned anti-virus software does not infringe 
claims 4, 7, 8, and 11-15 of the `600 patent and, therefore, is not 
covered by the Commission's cease and desist and limited exclusion 
orders, issued on August 8, 2005. On December 16, 2005, the Commission 
determined to institute an advisory opinion proceeding to determine 
whether Fortinet's redesigned anti-virus software infringes the 
asserted claims of the `600 patent.
    On January 11, 2006, the presiding ALJ consolidated the enforcement 
proceeding and advisory opinion proceeding.
    On December 16, 2005, Trend Micro moved for summary determination 
that Fortinet had violated sections III(B), III(D), and III(E) of the 
cease and desist order. On January 12, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID 
(Order No. 26) granting Trend Micro's motion for summary determination 
that Fortinet violated section III(B) of the cease and desist order. On 
February 9, 2006, the Commission determined not to review Order No. 26.
    On December 21, 2005, Fortinet filed a request for an additional 
advisory opinion concerning the so-called Clearswift license, which it 
later withdrew on February 15, 2006.
    On January 27, 2006, Trend Micro and Fortinet entered into a 
settlement agreement that resolves their dispute before the Commission. 
On February 14, 2006, Trend Micro and Fortinet filed a joint motion to 
terminate the consolidated proceedings on the basis of the settlement 
agreement. The joint motion included a petition to rescind the limited 
exclusion and cease and desist orders issued in the investigation, and 
a petition to vacate Order No. 26. On February 27, 2006, the Commission 
investigative attorney filed a response in support of the joint motion 
to terminate and in support of the joint petitions to rescind the 
limited exclusion and cease and desist orders and to vacate Order No. 
26.
    On February 28, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 31) granting 
the joint motion to terminate the consolidated enforcement and advisory 
opinion proceedings based on the settlement agreement. The ALJ also 
recommended that the Commission rescind the limited exclusion order and 
cease and desist order issued in the investigation and vacate Order No. 
26. No party petitioned for review of the ID.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID granting 
the parties' joint motion to terminate the consolidated enforcement and 
advisory opinion proceeding. Additionally, the Commission has 
determined that the parties' settlement agreement satisfies the 
requirement of section 337(k) and Commission rule 210.76(a)(1), 19 CFR 
210.76(a)(1), for changed conditions of fact or law and has therefore 
issued an order rescinding the limited exclusion order and cease and 
desist order previously issued by the Commission in the underlying 
investigation. Finally, in view of specific terms in the settlement 
agreement, the Commission has determined to vacate Order No. 26.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in sections 210.42 and 210.76 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42 and 210.76).

    Issued: March 29, 2006.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-3215 Filed 4-3-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.