General Management Plan for Golden Gate National Recreation Area; Marin, San Francisco, and San Mateo Counties, CA; Notice of Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement, 15761-15763 [06-3016]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2006 / Notices
available to public inspection all
submissions from organizations or
businesses and from persons identifying
themselves as representatives or
officials of organizations and
businesses; and, anonymous comments
may not be considered.
A public scoping Newsletter,
providing a preliminary synopsis of the
project status, will be distributed in
early March. In addition, two public
scoping meetings are scheduled to be
held on April 4 (in Sausalito) and April
5 (in San Francisco); both will occur
from 4–7:30 pm. For details on meeting
location, to request being added to the
project mailing list, or for other current
information updates, please contact the
GGNRA Negotiated Rulemaking
Information Line at (415) 561–4728.
As a delegated EIS, the official
responsible for approval of the Record
of Decision is the NPS Regional
Director, Pacific West Region;
subsequently the official who will be
responsible for implementation is the
Superintendent, Golden Gate National
Recreation Area.
Dated: February 23, 2006.
Jonathan B. Jarvis,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. E6–4544 Filed 3–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
hsrobinson on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
Final Environmental Impact Statement/
Fire Management Plan; Golden Gate
National Recreation Area; Marin, San
Francisco and San Mateo Counties,
CA; Notice of Approval of Record of
Decision
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91–190, as
amended) and the implementing
regulations promulgated by the Council
on Environmental Quality (40 CFR part
1505.2), the Department of the Interior,
National Park Service has prepared, and
the Regional Director, Pacific West
Region has approved the Record of
Decision for the updated Fire
Management Plan for Golden Gate
National Recreation Area. The formal
no-action waiting period was officially
initiated December 23, 2005, with the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s
Federal Register notification of the
filing of the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS).
Decision: As soon as practicable the
park will begin to implement as its
updated Fire Management Plan the
‘‘Hazard Reduction and Resource
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:39 Mar 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
Enhancement through Multiple
Treatments’’ alternative (also identified
and analyzed as the Preferred
Alternative C in the Draft and Final EIS).
The selected plan update allows for the
greatest number of acres to be treated
annually while minimizing potential
adverse resource effects of fire
management activities. Alternative C
utilizes prescribed burning and
mechanical treatment strategies deemed
to be appropriate for reducing fuel loads
near developed areas. Expanded
research will examine the role of these
strategies in enhancing natural resource
conditions, and will also be used to
adaptively guide the fire management
program and maximize the benefits to
park cultural and natural resources. As
documented in the EIS, this plan was
also deemed to be the ‘‘environmentally
preferred’’ alternative.
This course of action and two
alternatives were initially identified and
analyzed in the Draft EIS (distributed in
March 2005); minor modifications were
made based on public and agency
review. The Final EIS was released in
December 2005. The full spectrum of
foreseeable environmental
consequences was assessed, and
appropriate mitigation measures
identified. Beginning with early
scoping, through the preparation of the
Draft and Final EIS, numerous public
meetings and agency consultations were
conducted, and newsletter updates were
regularly provided. Approximately one
dozen written responses to the Draft EIS
were received and duly considered. Key
consultations which aided in preparing
the Draft and Final EIS involved (but
were not limited to) the California State
Historic Preservation Office, California
Coastal Commission, local air quality
management districts, adjoining land
managing agencies, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, and National Marine
Fisheries Service. Area residents,
county and city officials, and interested
organizations were contacted
extensively during initial scoping and
throughout the fire planning process.
Copies: Interested parties desiring to
review the Record of Decision may
obtain a complete copy by contacting
the Superintendent, Golden Gate
National Recreation Area, Bldg. 201, Ft.
Mason, San Francisco, CA 94123 or via
telephone request at (415) 331–6374.
Dated: February 24, 2006.
Jonathan B. Jarvis,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. E6–4545 Filed 3–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–FN–P
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15761
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
General Management Plan for Golden
Gate National Recreation Area; Marin,
San Francisco, and San Mateo
Counties, CA; Notice of Intent To
Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact
Statement
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the
U.S. Department of the Interior,
National Park Service is initiating the
scoping process for preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement on the
General Management Plan (GMP) for
Golden Gate National Recreation Area
(GGNRA), including Muir Woods
National Monument and Fort Point
National Historical Monument, in the
San Francisco Bay area of California.
The GMP will provide a well-grounded,
clearly defined direction for resource
protection and visitor management
throughout the area managed by
GGNRA, including Muir Woods
National Monument and Fort Point
National Historic Site, and lands
acquired since approval of the 1980
GMP.
Consistent with NPS Planning
Program Standards and the Secretary of
the Interior’s ‘‘Four C’s’’ (Conservation
through Consultation, Cooperation, and
Communication) the GMP will: (1)
Describe the purposes, significance, and
primary interpretive themes of the park;
(2) identify the fundamental resources
and values of the park, its other
important resources and values, and
describe the condition of these
resources; (3) describe desired
conditions for cultural and natural
resources and visitor experiences
throughout the park and for each
management unit in the park; (4)
develop management zoning to support
these desired conditions; (5) develop
alternative applications of these
management zones to the park
landscape (i.e., zoning alternatives); (6)
address carrying capacity; (7) analyze
potential boundary modifications; (8)
ensure that the GMP recommendations
are developed in consultation with
interested stakeholders and the public
and adopted by the NPS leadership after
an adequate analysis of the benefits,
environmental impacts, and economic
costs of alternative courses of action;
and (9) identify and prioritize
subsequent detailed studies, plans and
actions that may be needed to
implement the GMP.
In addition, the GMP will: (1)
Articulate park management
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
hsrobinson on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
15762
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2006 / Notices
philosophy; (2) provide the foundation
for managing park partnerships (which
are critical to the successful future
operation of GGNRA) and for
coordinating and collaborating with
adjacent public land managers; (3)
provide a framework for continued
public and partner stewardship of the
park’s resources; and (4) strive to foster
an engaged constituency that will
remain active in supporting the park in
the future.
Scoping: Through the scoping
process, the National Park Service (NPS)
welcomes suggestions from the public
regarding resource protection, visitor
use, and management of the lands
administered by GGNRA. This notice
formally initiates the public scoping
comment phase for the EIS process for
the GMP update. All scoping comments
must be postmarked or transmitted not
later than 60 days after the publication
of this notice—immediately upon
confirmation of this date it will be
announced on the park’s GMP Web site
(noted below). All written comments
should be submitted to the following
address: Brian O’Neill, Superintendent,
GGNRA (Attn: GMP Team), Fort Mason,
Bldg. 201, San Francisco, CA 94123 (or
may be transmitted by electronic mail to
goga._gmp@nps.gov or via Facsimile to
(415) 561–4710).
A key purpose of the scoping process
is to elicit early public comment on the
GMP proposal in order to inform the
development of the Draft EIS. In
addition, the scoping process will help
define issues or problems to be
addressed in the GMP. The public is
encouraged to provide comments and
pertinent information on issues and
concerns, goals and objectives,
alternatives, and potential
environmental impacts or mitigation
strategies. At this time it is expected
that 4 public meetings will be hosted
during April 19–27, 2006. Detailed
information regarding these meetings
will be posted on the GMP Web site (see
below). Following a short presentation
regarding the project, all attendees will
be given the opportunity to ask
questions and provide comments to the
planning team. The GMP Web site will
provide the most up-to-date information
regarding the project, including project
description, planning process updates,
meeting notices, reports and documents,
and useful links associated with the
project. The URL for the GMP Web site
is: https://parkplanning.nps/gov/goga
(once at the site, click on project name
and follow the instructions).
Informational messages may also be
accessed at (415) 561–4965.
It is the practice of the NPS to make
all comments, including names and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:39 Mar 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
addresses of respondents who provide
that information, available for public
review following the conclusion of the
NEPA process. Individuals may request
that the NPS withhold their name and/
or address from public disclosure. If you
wish to do this, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comments. Commentators using the
Web site can make such a request by
checking the box ‘‘keep my contact
information private’’.
NPS will honor such requests to the
extent allowable by law, but you should
be aware that the NPS may still be
required to disclose your name and
address pursuant to the Freedom of
Information Act.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Established in 1972, GGNRA is one of
the largest urban national park areas in
the world and one of the most highly
visited units in the National Park
System. GGNRA encompasses
approximately 59 miles of bay and
ocean shoreline in San Francisco,
Marin, and San Mateo Counties,
California, consisting of hay and ocean
beaches, redwood forests, lagoons,
control streams, marshes, military
properties, and such well known sites as
Alcatraz Island, Marin Headlands, Fort
Mason, and two separately designated
units of the National Park System—Muir
Woods National Monument (established
in 1908) and Fort Point National
Historic Site (established in 1970). The
current GMP for GGNRA was approved
in 1980. In 1988, lands administered by
GGNRA were included as part of the
Man and the Biosphere Program which
designated the Golden Gate Biosphere
Reserve, a partnership of 13 protected
areas within the greater San Francisco
Bay area.
The total area within the boundary
includes over 79,000 acres of landapproximately 47,000 acres are included
in the GMP planning area. Other areas
within the authorized boundary include
lands and waters that are not
administered by GGNR but have joint
management concerns (for example,
Mount Tamalpais State Park), those
Federal lands within GGNRA that are
managed by Point Reyes National
Seashore (the area north of BolinasFairfax Road), and those non-Federal
public lands for which GGNRA holds an
easement with certain rights and
responsibilities (23,000 acres of City of
San Francisco Watershed lands), as well
as non-Federal lands for which GGNRA
has no jurisdiction or management
responsibility (private lands) but
monitors development and use.
During the 25 years since the GMP for
GGNRA was approved, GGNRA has
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
been subjected to many boundary, land
ownership, and management changes.
The park’s authorized acreage has
expanded from 35,000 to over 79,000
acres, and management responsibilities
for some areas have been transferred to
other units in the National Park System
(i.e., San Francisco Maritime National
Historical Park, northern district lands,
etc.). Other lands have been acquired by
the National Park Service, and are now
managed by GGNRA (i.e., Presidio, Fort
Baker, San Mateo and Marin County
lands, etc.). In addition, the park has
been assigned new management
responsibilities for areas such as
easements over the 23,000 acre San
Francisco Peninsula Watershed, former
military lands, and leased tidelands. An
updated GMP is needed to address these
new land management responsibilities.
New planning is also needed to
address changed conditions and better
understanding of park resources and
values. Since 1980, significant changes
have occurred in public and National
Park Service understanding and
attitudes toward natural, cultural, and
recreational resources that are managed
by GGNRA. In 1980, the park was
viewed primarily as an urban recreation
area, and the emphasis of natural
resource management was to preserve
open space and natural character for the
purpose of enhancing recreational
opportunities within an aesthetic
setting. Lands and water bodies that are
within GGNRA are now highly regarded
for their ecological and scientific values.
Since 1980, 32 species known to occur
in the park have been listed as
threatened or endangered under
provisions of the Endangered species
Act.
Similarly, awareness of the park’s
cultural resources has expended
significantly since 1980. Some
structures that were initially proposed
for demolition in the 1980 GMP have
now been listed in the National Register
of Historic Places (NRHP). In addition,
the NPS better understands and
recognizes the importance of the park’s
cultural landscapes. Cultural landscape
inventories have identified 44 potential
cultural landscapes within park
boundaries that were not addressed in
the 1980 GMP, and 11 cultural
landscapes are now listed or have been
determined eligible for listing in the
NRHP.
Decision Process: At this time it is
anticipated that the DEIS\GMP will be
available for public review in 2009.
Availability of the Draft EIS document
will be formally announced through the
publication of a Notice of Availability in
the Federal Register, as well as through
local and regional news media, direct
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2006 / Notices
mailing to the project mailing list, and
via the Internet at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/goga. Following
consideration of all agency and public
comment, a Final EIS will be prepared.
As a delegated EIS the official
responsible for the final decision on the
proposed plan is the Regional Director,
Pacific West Region, subsequently the
official responsible for implementation
of the approved plan is the
Superintendent, Golden Gate National
Recreation Area.
Dated: March 20, 2006
Jonathan B. Jarvis,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 06–3016 Filed 3–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–FN–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
hsrobinson on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
Extension of San Francisco Municipal
Railway Historic Streetcar Service;
Golden Gate National Recreation Area
and San Francisco Maritime National
Historical Park; County of San
Francisco; Notice of Intent To Prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement
SUMMARY: In accordance with section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, and pursuant to the
Council on Environmental Quality’s
regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–08), the
National Park Service is initiating the
conservation planning and
environmental impact analysis process
for the proposed extension of the
northern waterfront Municipal Railway
Historic Streetcar Service. Beginning at
Fisherman’s Wharf, this proposed
railway extension would serve visitors
to two popular units of the National
Park System—San Francisco Maritime
National Historical Park and the Fort
Mason area of Golden Gate National
Recreation Area. This project is being
developed in close coordination with
San Francisco Municipal Railway and
other City and County of San Francisco
planning and transportation agencies.
Background: A congressionallymandated Travel Study completed in
1977 recommended restoring the
historic rail link between the Hyde
Street Pier and Fort Mason to improve
access to various National Park Service
(NPS) sites. The rail line was
subsequently abandoned (1980), and the
area between Hyde Street Pier and the
Fort Mason tunnel entrance was
designated a National Historic
Landmark District in 1987 (which is
now encompassed in the San Francisco
Maritime National Historical Park
created in 1988). Also, in the late 1980s
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:39 Mar 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
Federal highway funds originally
intended for extending Interstate 280
were reallocated to a number of
alternative transportation facilities along
the Embarcadero including creation of
an historic streetcar line along Market
Street and the Embarcadero to
Fisherman’s Wharf. In 2000 this service
was extended to Fisherman’s Wharf,
only .85 miles from the public-serving
facilities at Fort Mason Center. The
popularity of the historic streetcars,
which currently serve more than 20,000
passengers a day, has resulted in public
and private interest in extending the
service, with the creation of the E-Line
to Fort Mason.
The Municipal Railway (MUNI)
currently operates historic streetcar
service on Market Street and along the
San Francisco waterfront (F-Line) to the
line’s existing terminus at Jones Street
and Beach (in the Fisherman’s Wharf
area). The E-Line extension would begin
at the terminus of the F-line and extend
west to San Francisco Maritime
National Historical Park (NHP) and on
to Fort Mason. The exact route has yet
to be determined but would utilize
either existing rail right-of-way routes
confined to city streets or pass through
NHP’s Aquatic Park (at the core of the
National Historic Landmark District) in
order to reach the Fort Mason tunnel. It
is anticipated that under all alternatives
the railway line would extend through
the tunnel and end in the area of lower
Fort Mason.
The NHP is visited by approximately
4 million people annually and is
currently served by very popular cable
cars (often crowded at peak tourist
times) as well as streetcar and bus lines.
Fort Mason, home to the Fort Mason
Center, houses more than 40 non-profit
organizations offering more than 15,000
events a year and attracting upwards of
1.6 million visitors. The Fort Mason
area is underserved by mass transit
access, and as a result automobile-based
visitation causes massive parking
problems that affect surrounding
neighborhoods. Furthermore,
inadequate mass transit access makes it
difficult for transit-dependent San
Franciscans to enjoy the cultural and
educational events offered at Fort
Mason Center.
Development of Alternatives: At this
time a full range of alternatives has not
been confirmed. However, in order to be
successful, any project selected would:
• Increase alternative transportation
options for visitors to the NHP and Fort
Mason;
• Serve a new cohesive recreation
and cultural corridor along the northern
waterfront;
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15763
• Enhance links for the City’s lowerincome population with all NPS sites
and other northern waterfront
attractions;
• Improve local and regional transit
connectivity and decrease the need for
automobile use and parking in historic
and environmentally sensitive areas;
• Facilitate efforts to reduce the need
for automobile-based trips to the
National Historic Landmark District
destinations by providing park visitors
an attractive, non-polluting mass transit
access;
• Avoid or minimize adverse effects
on the National Historic Landmark
District and related cultural and historic
resources and waterfront values.
Scoping: This notice serves to
formally open the public scoping
comment phase for this planning
process. The purpose of the scoping
process is to elicit public comment on
the proposed extension in order to
inform the development of the Draft EIS.
The public and interested organizations
are encouraged to provide comment on
issues and concerns, feasible
alternatives, potential environmental
effects and appropriate mitigation
measures that would reduce project
impacts. The public will have an initial
opportunity to comment on the proposal
by attending a public scoping meeting
or providing written comments
electronically via the internet or sending
letters through the mail. All scoping
comments must be postmarked or
transmitted not later than 60 days after
the publication of this Notice in the
Federal Register—as soon as this ending
date is confirmed, it will be announced
on the project Web site (noted below).
The NPS anticipates hosting a public
meeting in late March 2006 (complete
information regarding this meeting will
be posted on the project Web site).
Following a short presentation regarding
the project, the public will be given the
opportunity to ask questions and
provide comments to the planning team.
The project Web site will provide the
most up-to-date information regarding
the project, including project
description, planning process updates,
meeting notices, reports and documents,
and useful links associated with the
project (the Web site is: https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/goga; once at the
site, click on project name and follow
Web site instructions). Written
comments should be mailed to the
following address: Superintendent—
GGNRA, Attn: Rick Foster, MUNI
Railway Extension Project Manager, Fort
Mason, Bldg. 201, San Francisco, CA
94123. In addition to the project Web
site, project updates or requests to be
included on the Draft EIS mailing list
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15761-15763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3016]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
General Management Plan for Golden Gate National Recreation Area;
Marin, San Francisco, and San Mateo Counties, CA; Notice of Intent To
Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the U.S. Department of the Interior,
National Park Service is initiating the scoping process for preparation
of an Environmental Impact Statement on the General Management Plan
(GMP) for Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), including Muir
Woods National Monument and Fort Point National Historical Monument, in
the San Francisco Bay area of California. The GMP will provide a well-
grounded, clearly defined direction for resource protection and visitor
management throughout the area managed by GGNRA, including Muir Woods
National Monument and Fort Point National Historic Site, and lands
acquired since approval of the 1980 GMP.
Consistent with NPS Planning Program Standards and the Secretary of
the Interior's ``Four C's'' (Conservation through Consultation,
Cooperation, and Communication) the GMP will: (1) Describe the
purposes, significance, and primary interpretive themes of the park;
(2) identify the fundamental resources and values of the park, its
other important resources and values, and describe the condition of
these resources; (3) describe desired conditions for cultural and
natural resources and visitor experiences throughout the park and for
each management unit in the park; (4) develop management zoning to
support these desired conditions; (5) develop alternative applications
of these management zones to the park landscape (i.e., zoning
alternatives); (6) address carrying capacity; (7) analyze potential
boundary modifications; (8) ensure that the GMP recommendations are
developed in consultation with interested stakeholders and the public
and adopted by the NPS leadership after an adequate analysis of the
benefits, environmental impacts, and economic costs of alternative
courses of action; and (9) identify and prioritize subsequent detailed
studies, plans and actions that may be needed to implement the GMP.
In addition, the GMP will: (1) Articulate park management
[[Page 15762]]
philosophy; (2) provide the foundation for managing park partnerships
(which are critical to the successful future operation of GGNRA) and
for coordinating and collaborating with adjacent public land managers;
(3) provide a framework for continued public and partner stewardship of
the park's resources; and (4) strive to foster an engaged constituency
that will remain active in supporting the park in the future.
Scoping: Through the scoping process, the National Park Service
(NPS) welcomes suggestions from the public regarding resource
protection, visitor use, and management of the lands administered by
GGNRA. This notice formally initiates the public scoping comment phase
for the EIS process for the GMP update. All scoping comments must be
postmarked or transmitted not later than 60 days after the publication
of this notice--immediately upon confirmation of this date it will be
announced on the park's GMP Web site (noted below). All written
comments should be submitted to the following address: Brian O'Neill,
Superintendent, GGNRA (Attn: GMP Team), Fort Mason, Bldg. 201, San
Francisco, CA 94123 (or may be transmitted by electronic mail to
goga._gmp@nps.gov or via Facsimile to (415) 561-4710).
A key purpose of the scoping process is to elicit early public
comment on the GMP proposal in order to inform the development of the
Draft EIS. In addition, the scoping process will help define issues or
problems to be addressed in the GMP. The public is encouraged to
provide comments and pertinent information on issues and concerns,
goals and objectives, alternatives, and potential environmental impacts
or mitigation strategies. At this time it is expected that 4 public
meetings will be hosted during April 19-27, 2006. Detailed information
regarding these meetings will be posted on the GMP Web site (see
below). Following a short presentation regarding the project, all
attendees will be given the opportunity to ask questions and provide
comments to the planning team. The GMP Web site will provide the most
up-to-date information regarding the project, including project
description, planning process updates, meeting notices, reports and
documents, and useful links associated with the project. The URL for
the GMP Web site is: https://parkplanning.nps/gov/goga (once at the
site, click on project name and follow the instructions). Informational
messages may also be accessed at (415) 561-4965.
It is the practice of the NPS to make all comments, including names
and addresses of respondents who provide that information, available
for public review following the conclusion of the NEPA process.
Individuals may request that the NPS withhold their name and/or address
from public disclosure. If you wish to do this, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your comments. Commentators using the
Web site can make such a request by checking the box ``keep my contact
information private''.
NPS will honor such requests to the extent allowable by law, but
you should be aware that the NPS may still be required to disclose your
name and address pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Established in 1972, GGNRA is one of the
largest urban national park areas in the world and one of the most
highly visited units in the National Park System. GGNRA encompasses
approximately 59 miles of bay and ocean shoreline in San Francisco,
Marin, and San Mateo Counties, California, consisting of hay and ocean
beaches, redwood forests, lagoons, control streams, marshes, military
properties, and such well known sites as Alcatraz Island, Marin
Headlands, Fort Mason, and two separately designated units of the
National Park System--Muir Woods National Monument (established in
1908) and Fort Point National Historic Site (established in 1970). The
current GMP for GGNRA was approved in 1980. In 1988, lands administered
by GGNRA were included as part of the Man and the Biosphere Program
which designated the Golden Gate Biosphere Reserve, a partnership of 13
protected areas within the greater San Francisco Bay area.
The total area within the boundary includes over 79,000 acres of
land-approximately 47,000 acres are included in the GMP planning area.
Other areas within the authorized boundary include lands and waters
that are not administered by GGNR but have joint management concerns
(for example, Mount Tamalpais State Park), those Federal lands within
GGNRA that are managed by Point Reyes National Seashore (the area north
of Bolinas-Fairfax Road), and those non-Federal public lands for which
GGNRA holds an easement with certain rights and responsibilities
(23,000 acres of City of San Francisco Watershed lands), as well as
non-Federal lands for which GGNRA has no jurisdiction or management
responsibility (private lands) but monitors development and use.
During the 25 years since the GMP for GGNRA was approved, GGNRA has
been subjected to many boundary, land ownership, and management
changes. The park's authorized acreage has expanded from 35,000 to over
79,000 acres, and management responsibilities for some areas have been
transferred to other units in the National Park System (i.e., San
Francisco Maritime National Historical Park, northern district lands,
etc.). Other lands have been acquired by the National Park Service, and
are now managed by GGNRA (i.e., Presidio, Fort Baker, San Mateo and
Marin County lands, etc.). In addition, the park has been assigned new
management responsibilities for areas such as easements over the 23,000
acre San Francisco Peninsula Watershed, former military lands, and
leased tidelands. An updated GMP is needed to address these new land
management responsibilities.
New planning is also needed to address changed conditions and
better understanding of park resources and values. Since 1980,
significant changes have occurred in public and National Park Service
understanding and attitudes toward natural, cultural, and recreational
resources that are managed by GGNRA. In 1980, the park was viewed
primarily as an urban recreation area, and the emphasis of natural
resource management was to preserve open space and natural character
for the purpose of enhancing recreational opportunities within an
aesthetic setting. Lands and water bodies that are within GGNRA are now
highly regarded for their ecological and scientific values. Since 1980,
32 species known to occur in the park have been listed as threatened or
endangered under provisions of the Endangered species Act.
Similarly, awareness of the park's cultural resources has expended
significantly since 1980. Some structures that were initially proposed
for demolition in the 1980 GMP have now been listed in the National
Register of Historic Places (NRHP). In addition, the NPS better
understands and recognizes the importance of the park's cultural
landscapes. Cultural landscape inventories have identified 44 potential
cultural landscapes within park boundaries that were not addressed in
the 1980 GMP, and 11 cultural landscapes are now listed or have been
determined eligible for listing in the NRHP.
Decision Process: At this time it is anticipated that the DEIS\GMP
will be available for public review in 2009. Availability of the Draft
EIS document will be formally announced through the publication of a
Notice of Availability in the Federal Register, as well as through
local and regional news media, direct
[[Page 15763]]
mailing to the project mailing list, and via the Internet at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/goga. Following consideration of all agency and
public comment, a Final EIS will be prepared. As a delegated EIS the
official responsible for the final decision on the proposed plan is the
Regional Director, Pacific West Region, subsequently the official
responsible for implementation of the approved plan is the
Superintendent, Golden Gate National Recreation Area.
Dated: March 20, 2006
Jonathan B. Jarvis,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 06-3016 Filed 3-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-FN-M