Denial of Motor Vehicle Defect Petition, 14988 [E6-4309]
Download as PDF
14988
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 57 / Friday, March 24, 2006 / Notices
• Objectives,
• Implementation strategies,
• Performance measures, and
• Monitoring and evaluation plan.
Upon receipt, the applications will be
reviewed by FMCSA and prioritized for
potential funding. Applicants approved
for funding will be required to enter into
a grant agreement with FMCSA. A
Division Administrator will execute the
grant agreement with the applicant on
behalf of FMCSA.
If funds remain available after
allocations are made for applications
submitted by April 28, 2006, additional
applications may be submitted and will
be considered for funding until all
available funds have been allocated.
A copy of the MCSAP–1 grant
application form is available and can be
downloaded from https://
www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety-security/
safety-initiatives/mcsap/
mcsapforms.htm.
It is anticipated the grants.gov
application process will be available for
use by applicants applying for MCSAP
New Entrant and High Priority grants by
April 28, 2006.
Addresses of the FMCSA Division
Offices are available on the Internet at
https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/about/
contact/offices/displayfieldroster.asp.
Issued on: March 20, 2006.
Annette M. Sandberg,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6–4325 Filed 3–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Denial of Motor Vehicle Defect Petition
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Denial of petition for a defect
investigation.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the
reasons for the denial of a petition
submitted by Ms. Elyse Gerber to
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation
(ODI), received October 13, 2005, under
49 U.S.C. 30162, requesting that the
agency commence a proceeding to
determine the existence of a defect
related to motor vehicle safety with
respect to electrical system shut down
on model year (MY) 2000 Mercedes
Benz E430 vehicles. After a review of
the petition and other information,
NHTSA has concluded that further
expenditure of the agency’s
investigative resources on the issues
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Mar 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
raised by the petition does not appear to
be warranted. The agency accordingly
has denied the petition. The petition is
hereinafter identified as DP05–007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Steve Chan, Defects Assessment
Division, Office of Defects Investigation,
NHTSA, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone:
(202) 366–8537.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By letter
dated September 20, 2005, Ms. Gerber of
Belleair Beach, FL, submitted a petition
requesting that the agency investigate
electrical system shut down on MY
2000 Mercedes Benz E430 vehicles. The
petitioner alleges that coffee from a cup,
placed in the cup holder, spilled onto
the gear shifter and shut down the
vehicle’s entire electrical system. The
petitioner indicated that the vehicle
jerked and slowed down, but she was
able to maneuver the vehicle off the
highway and into a shopping center
parking lot.
The concern raised by the petitioner
was investigated by the Office of Defects
Investigation (ODI) of NHTSA. The
investigation (SQ01–010) was opened
on September 25, 2001 on MY 2000
through 2001 Mercedes Benz SLK, C,
CLK, and E Series vehicles. NHTSA
opened the investigation after receiving
three complaints concerning liquid
spillage onto the transmission shifter
(center console) area, which reportedly
caused the vehicle to stall or shut down,
and a related technical service bulletin
(TSB) issued by Mercedes Benz. The
TSB identifies improved ‘‘TouchShifters’’ (ESM-Electronic Selector
Modules) that were more resistant to
fluid contamination, which were
installed on vehicles produced after
March 2001.
Mercedes Benz’s letter dated January
24, 2002, sent in response to a request
for information by ODI, identified 164
consumer complaints and 241 nonduplicate warranty claims concerning
liquid spillage onto the transmission
shifter. The response showed that in
many cases, depending on the severity
of the spill, fluid spills onto the
transmission shifter/center console of
the subject vehicles will have no effect
on drivability. Where a substantial
amount of fluid is spilled, the fluid may
penetrate the console and contaminate
the ESM circuitry located under the
console. In certain cases, this can result
in a shifter malfunction. Owners
reported that they have experienced that
the shifter is stiff or difficult to operate,
or that the shifter could not be shifted
out of the ‘‘Park’’ position. In the event
of a fluid spill while the vehicle is
moving, the damaged ESM will activate
PO 00000
Frm 00157
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the electronic transmission’s ‘‘limphome’’ mode. This mode will prevent
the transmission from shifting past
second gear while averting a stall or
shut-down so that the vehicle can still
be driven at a lower speed. Furthermore,
Mercedes Benz’s response indicated that
there are no electronics related to the
power brakes, power steering, or engine
under the center console, and the
company was unaware of any
engineering basis for fluid spills in this
area having any effect on those vehicle
functions. No related crashes or injuries
were identified during SQ01–010. Based
on Mercedes’ response and ODI’s
analysis of the facts, ODI closed its
inquiry in February 2002. ODI
concluded that the facts did not
demonstrate a safety-related defect.
ODI has subsequently received nine
more complaints alleging fluid
contamination of the transmission
shifter since the investigation was
closed, none of which report crashes or
injuries. These nine complainants
mainly expressed dissatisfaction with
the design of the cup holder and the
cost of replacing the contaminated ESM.
Similarly, in petitioner’s case she was
able to operate the vehicle to a place
where it could be safety stopped after
the liquid spillage. The petitioner has
not provided any evidence of a safetyrelated defect.
In view of the foregoing, it is unlikely
that NHTSA would issue an order for
the notification and remedy of the
alleged defect as defined by the
petitioner at the conclusion of the
investigation requested in the petition.
Therefore, in view of the need to
allocate and prioritize NHTSA’s limited
resources to best accomplish the
agency’s safety mission, the petition is
denied.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30162(d); delegations
of authority at CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Issued on: March 21, 2006.
Daniel Smith
Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E6–4309 Filed 3–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 34843]
Union Pacific Railroad Company—
Temporary Trackage Rights
Exemption—BNSF Railway Company
BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) has
agreed to grant temporary overhead
trackage rights to Union Pacific Railroad
Company (UP) over BNSF’s lines
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 14988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-4309]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Denial of Motor Vehicle Defect Petition
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Denial of petition for a defect investigation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the reasons for the denial of a
petition submitted by Ms. Elyse Gerber to NHTSA's Office of Defects
Investigation (ODI), received October 13, 2005, under 49 U.S.C. 30162,
requesting that the agency commence a proceeding to determine the
existence of a defect related to motor vehicle safety with respect to
electrical system shut down on model year (MY) 2000 Mercedes Benz E430
vehicles. After a review of the petition and other information, NHTSA
has concluded that further expenditure of the agency's investigative
resources on the issues raised by the petition does not appear to be
warranted. The agency accordingly has denied the petition. The petition
is hereinafter identified as DP05-007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Steve Chan, Defects Assessment
Division, Office of Defects Investigation, NHTSA, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20590. Telephone: (202) 366-8537.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By letter dated September 20, 2005, Ms.
Gerber of Belleair Beach, FL, submitted a petition requesting that the
agency investigate electrical system shut down on MY 2000 Mercedes Benz
E430 vehicles. The petitioner alleges that coffee from a cup, placed in
the cup holder, spilled onto the gear shifter and shut down the
vehicle's entire electrical system. The petitioner indicated that the
vehicle jerked and slowed down, but she was able to maneuver the
vehicle off the highway and into a shopping center parking lot.
The concern raised by the petitioner was investigated by the Office
of Defects Investigation (ODI) of NHTSA. The investigation (SQ01-010)
was opened on September 25, 2001 on MY 2000 through 2001 Mercedes Benz
SLK, C, CLK, and E Series vehicles. NHTSA opened the investigation
after receiving three complaints concerning liquid spillage onto the
transmission shifter (center console) area, which reportedly caused the
vehicle to stall or shut down, and a related technical service bulletin
(TSB) issued by Mercedes Benz. The TSB identifies improved ``Touch-
Shifters'' (ESM-Electronic Selector Modules) that were more resistant
to fluid contamination, which were installed on vehicles produced after
March 2001.
Mercedes Benz's letter dated January 24, 2002, sent in response to
a request for information by ODI, identified 164 consumer complaints
and 241 non-duplicate warranty claims concerning liquid spillage onto
the transmission shifter. The response showed that in many cases,
depending on the severity of the spill, fluid spills onto the
transmission shifter/center console of the subject vehicles will have
no effect on drivability. Where a substantial amount of fluid is
spilled, the fluid may penetrate the console and contaminate the ESM
circuitry located under the console. In certain cases, this can result
in a shifter malfunction. Owners reported that they have experienced
that the shifter is stiff or difficult to operate, or that the shifter
could not be shifted out of the ``Park'' position. In the event of a
fluid spill while the vehicle is moving, the damaged ESM will activate
the electronic transmission's ``limp-home'' mode. This mode will
prevent the transmission from shifting past second gear while averting
a stall or shut-down so that the vehicle can still be driven at a lower
speed. Furthermore, Mercedes Benz's response indicated that there are
no electronics related to the power brakes, power steering, or engine
under the center console, and the company was unaware of any
engineering basis for fluid spills in this area having any effect on
those vehicle functions. No related crashes or injuries were identified
during SQ01-010. Based on Mercedes' response and ODI's analysis of the
facts, ODI closed its inquiry in February 2002. ODI concluded that the
facts did not demonstrate a safety-related defect.
ODI has subsequently received nine more complaints alleging fluid
contamination of the transmission shifter since the investigation was
closed, none of which report crashes or injuries. These nine
complainants mainly expressed dissatisfaction with the design of the
cup holder and the cost of replacing the contaminated ESM. Similarly,
in petitioner's case she was able to operate the vehicle to a place
where it could be safety stopped after the liquid spillage. The
petitioner has not provided any evidence of a safety-related defect.
In view of the foregoing, it is unlikely that NHTSA would issue an
order for the notification and remedy of the alleged defect as defined
by the petitioner at the conclusion of the investigation requested in
the petition. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize
NHTSA's limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety
mission, the petition is denied.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30162(d); delegations of authority at CFR
1.50 and 501.8.
Issued on: March 21, 2006.
Daniel Smith
Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E6-4309 Filed 3-23-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P