Adobe Air, Inc., Phoenix, AZ; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration, 14951 [E6-4283]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 57 / Friday, March 24, 2006 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC this 14th day of
March 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–4283 Filed 3–23–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,515]
Ablest Staffing Services Working OnSite at Wellington Leisure Products,
Granite Quarry, NC; Dismissal of
Application for Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
Ablest Staffing Services, Working OnSite at Wellington Leisure Products,
Granite Quarry, North Carolina. The
application did not contain new
information supporting a conclusion
that the determination was erroneous,
and also did not provide a justification
for reconsideration of the determination
that was based on either mistaken facts
or a misinterpretation of facts or of the
law. Therefore, dismissal of the
application was issued.
TA–W–58,515; Ablest Staffing Services,
Working On-Site at Wellington Leisure
Products Granite Quarry, North Carolina,
(March 16, 2006).
Signed at Washington, DC this 17th day of
February 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–4285 Filed 3–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Adobe Air, Inc., Phoenix, AZ; Dismissal
of Application for Reconsideration
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,663]
Classic Print Products, Inc.,
Burlington, NC; Dismissal of
Application for Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
Classic Print Products, Inc., Burlington,
North Carolina. The application did not
contain new information supporting a
conclusion that the determination was
erroneous, and also did not provide a
justification for reconsideration of the
determination that was based on either
mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal
of the application was issued.
TA–W–58,663; Classic Print Products, Inc.,
Burlington, North Carolina (March 16,
2006).
Signed at Washington, DC this 17th day of
February 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–4287 Filed 3–23–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA–W–58,406]
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
Adobe Air, Inc., Phoenix, Arizona. The
application did not contain new
information supporting a conclusion
that the determination was erroneous,
and also did not provide a justification
for reconsideration of the determination
that was based on either mistaken facts
or a misinterpretation of facts or of the
law. Therefore, dismissal of the
application was issued.
TA–W–58,406; Adobe Air, Inc., Phoenix,
Arizona (March 13, 2006.)
18:26 Mar 23, 2006
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Employment and Training
Administration
VerDate Aug<31>2005
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Jkt 208001
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–57,794]
Cognis Corporation Cincinnati, OH;
Notice of Negative Determination on
Reconsideration
On November 29, 2005, the
Department issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration for the workers and
former workers of Cognis Corporation,
Cincinnati, Ohio. The Department’s
Notice was published in the Federal
Register on March 2, 2006 (71 FR
10708).
The negative determination was based
on the findings that there was no shift
of specialty chemical production abroad
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14951
by the subject firm and no increased
imports of specialty chemicals during
the relevant period. Workers produce
specialty chemicals, including fatty
acids, glycerin, and ozone acids, and are
not separately identifiable by product
line.
In the request for reconsideration, the
United Steelworkers of America, Local
14340, asserted that workers produced
‘‘certain oleo chemical products and
fatty alcohol products which are sold to
other companies for use as ingredients
or additives in those companies’
products such as cosmetics, soaps, tires,
and paints.’’ The Union also asserted
that increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with those
produced by the subject firm had
contributed to the workers’ separations.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department contacted
the Union and the subject company to
ascertain what product was made by the
worker group and the reason(s) for the
worker separations. The product at issue
are APG surfactants.
According to the Union and the
company official, a major customer
reformulated its product to use a blend
of chemicals that has the same effect as
the chemical purchased from the subject
firm, alkyl polyglycoside (APG)
surfactants, and, as a result, ceased
purchasing APG surfactants from the
subject firm. APG surfactants are used
commercially in cleaning products.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department collected
sales, production, and import data from
the subject company regarding APG
surfactants and conducted a survey of
the major declining customer regarding
its purchases of APG surfactants during
2003, 2004, January through August
2004, and January through August 2005.
A careful review of the information
provided by the subject company
revealed reduced production of APG
surfactants, no increased imports of
APG surfactants, and no shift of APG
surfactants production abroad during
the relevant period.
According to the customer, there is no
one chemical which is like or directly
competitive with APG surfactants
because of its specific characteristics.
The survey result revealed that the
customer did not have any import
purchases of APG surfactants during the
relevant period.
Conclusion
After careful reconsideration, I affirm
the original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance for
workers and former workers of Cognis
Corporation, Cincinnati, Ohio.
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 14951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-4283]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-58,406]
Adobe Air, Inc., Phoenix, AZ; Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Adobe Air, Inc., Phoenix, Arizona.
The application did not contain new information supporting a conclusion
that the determination was erroneous, and also did not provide a
justification for reconsideration of the determination that was based
on either mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of facts or of the law.
Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.
TA-W-58,406; Adobe Air, Inc., Phoenix, Arizona (March 13, 2006.)
Signed at Washington, DC this 14th day of March 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6-4283 Filed 3-23-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
