Brass Sheet and Strip from Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan, 14719 [E6-4197]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 56 / Thursday, March 23, 2006 / Notices including human remains that had been in the possession of the now deceased Dr. Bank. Unalaska Island and nearby Amaknak and Split Rock Islands have been inhabited for over 8,000 years by Aleut (Unangan) people. Based on geographic location, oral history, and archeological evidence, the human remains from these three islands are of Aleut (Unangan) origin. The Aleut (Unangan) are ancestors of the Qawalangin Tribe of Unalaska, the current and only Indian tribe of Unalaska, AK. Officials of the Bureau of Land Management have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (9–10), the human remains described above represent the physical remains of 13 individuals of Native American ancestry. Officials of the Bureau of Land Management have also determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is a relationship of shared group identity that can be reasonably traced between the Native American human remains and the Qawalangin Tribe of Unalaska. Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes itself to be culturally affiliated with the human remains should contact Dr. Robert E. King, Alaska State NAGPRA Coordinator, Bureau of Land Management, 222 West 7th Avenue, No. 13, Anchorage, AK 99513–7599, telephone (907) 271–5510, before April 24, 2006. Repatriation of the human remains to the Qawalangin Tribe of Unalaska may proceed after that date if no additional claimants come forward. The Bureau of Land Management is responsible for notifying the Ounalashka Corporation and Qawalangin Tribe of Unalaska that this notice has been published. Dated: March 14, 2006. Sherry Hutt, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. E6–4179 Filed 3–22–06; 8:45 am] wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES BILLING CODE 4312–50–S INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–269 and 731– TA–311–314, 317, and 379 (Second Review)] Brass Sheet and Strip from Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on brass sheet and strip from France, Germany, Italy, and Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.2 The Commission further determines that revocation of the countervailing duty order on brass sheet and strip from Brazil and the antidumping duty orders on brass sheet and strip from Brazil and Canada would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.3 Background The Commission instituted these reviews on March 31, 2005 (70 FR 16519) and determined on July 5, 2005 that it would conduct full reviews (70 FR 41427, July 19, 2005). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on September 9, 2005 (70 FR 53688). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on January 24, 2006, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to the Secretary of Commerce on March 21, 2006. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3842 (March 2006), entitled Brass Sheet and Strip From Brazil, Canada, France, 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 On March 2, 2006, the Commission terminated the five-year review of the countervailing duty order concerning brass sheet and strip from France (investigation No. 701–TA–270 (Second Review)). 3 Chairman Stephen Koplan and Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane dissenting with respect to Brazil. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:54 Mar 22, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 14719 Germany, Italy, and Japan: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–269 and 731–TA–311–314, 317, and 379 (Second Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: March 20, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–4197 Filed 3–22–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–555] In the Matter of Certain Devices for Determining Organ Positions and Certain Subassemblies Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination not to Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion to Intervene U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 5) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) ´ granting the motion of Universite Joseph Fourier (Grenoble) (‘‘UJF’’) of Grenoble, France, to intervene as a complainant in the above-captioned investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clara Kuehn, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3012. Copies of the public version of the ALJ’s ID and all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS– ON–LINE) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on December 2, 2005, based on a complaint filed by SAS PRAXIM of La Tronche, France and Varian Medical E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM 23MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 14719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-4197]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-269 and 731-TA-311-314, 317, and 379 (Second 
Review)]


Brass Sheet and Strip from Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, 
Italy, and Japan

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty 
orders on brass sheet and strip from France, Germany, Italy, and Japan 
would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material 
injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably 
foreseeable time.\2\ The Commission further determines that revocation 
of the countervailing duty order on brass sheet and strip from Brazil 
and the antidumping duty orders on brass sheet and strip from Brazil 
and Canada would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of 
material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably 
foreseeable time.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ On March 2, 2006, the Commission terminated the five-year 
review of the countervailing duty order concerning brass sheet and 
strip from France (investigation No. 701-TA-270 (Second Review)).
    \3\ Chairman Stephen Koplan and Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane 
dissenting with respect to Brazil.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on March 31, 2005 (70 FR 
16519) and determined on July 5, 2005 that it would conduct full 
reviews (70 FR 41427, July 19, 2005). Notice of the scheduling of the 
Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection 
therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of 
the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and 
by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on September 9, 2005 
(70 FR 53688). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on January 24, 
2006, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to 
appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to 
the Secretary of Commerce on March 21, 2006. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3842 (March 2006), 
entitled Brass Sheet and Strip From Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, 
Italy, and Japan: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-269 and 731-TA-311-314, 
317, and 379 (Second Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 20, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-4197 Filed 3-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.