Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Review: Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Italy, 13964-13966 [E6-3990]
Download as PDF
13964
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 2006 / Notices
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230;
telephone (202) 482 2924 (Baker), (202)
482–0649 (James).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Background
On August 11, 1995, the Department
published the antidumping duty order
on OCTG from Argentina. See
Antidumping Duty Order: Oil Country
Tubular Goods from Argentina, 60 FR
41055 (August 11, 1995). On August 1,
2005, we published in the Federal
Register a notice of opportunity to
request administrative reviews. See
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 70 FR 44085
(August 1, 2005). On August 31, 2005,
United States Steel Corporation
(petitioner) requested that the
Department conduct an administrative
review of sales of the subject
merchandise made by Siderca.
On September 28, 2005, the
Department published a notice of
initiation of this administrative review.
See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Requests for Revocation in
Part, 70 FR 56631 (September 28, 2005).
The Department issued its antidumping
duty questionnaire to Siderca on
October 3, 2005. In response, Siderca
stated in an October 24, 2005,
submission that it had no entries for
consumption of subject merchandise of
OCTG during the POR, and requested
that the Department rescind the
administrative review with respect to
Siderca.
On January 24, 2006, the Department
placed on the record of the review
copies of documents regarding entries of
subject merchandise from Argentina
that it obtained from Customs and
Border Protection (CBP). On February 2,
2006, the Department issued a letter to
petitioners, domestic interested parties,
and Siderca stating that the Department
intended to rescind the review. We
invited parties to submit comments on
our intent to rescind the review. We
requested that any comments be
submitted by February 9, 2006. We
received no comments.
Period of Review
The POR is August 1, 2004 through
July 31, 2005.
Scope of the Review
OCTG are hollow steel products of
circular cross-section, including oil well
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:35 Mar 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
casing and tubing of iron (other than
cast iron) or steel (both carbon and
alloy), whether seamless or welded,
whether or not conforming to American
Petroleum Institute (API) or non–API
specifications, whether finished or
unfinished (including green tubes and
limited service OCTG products).
This scope does not cover casing or
tubing pipe containing 10.5 percent or
more of chromium. Drill pipe was
excluded from this order beginning
August 11, 2001. See Continuation of
Countervailing and Antidumping Duty
Orders on Oil Country Tubular Goods
From Argentina, Italy, Japan, Korea and
Mexico, and Partial Revocation of Those
Orders From Argentina and Mexico
With Respect to Drill Pipe, 66 FR 38630
(July 25, 2001).
The OCTG subject to this order are
currently classified in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) under item numbers:
7304.29.10.10, 7304.29.10.20,
7304.29.10.30, 7304.29.10.40,
7304.29.10.50, 7304.29.10.60,
7304.29.10.80, 7304.29.20.10,
7304.29.20.20, 7304.29.20.30,
7304.29.20.40, 7304.29.20.50,
7304.29.20.60, 7304.29.20.80,
7304.29.30.10, 7304.29.30.20,
7304.29.30.30, 7304.29.30.40,
7304.29.30.50, 7304.29.30.60,
7304.29.30.80, 7304.29.40.10,
7304.29.40.20, 7304.29.40.30,
7304.29.40.40, 7304.29.40.50,
7304.29.40.60, 7304.29.40.80,
7304.29.50.15, 7304.29.50.30,
7304.29.50.45, 7304.29.50.60,
7304.29.50.75, 7304.29.60.15,
7304.29.60.30, 7304.29.60.45,
7304.29.60.60, 7304.29.60.75,
7305.20.20.00, 7305.20.40.00,
7305.20.60.00, 7305.20.80.00,
7306.20.10.30, 7306.20.10.90,
7306.20.20.00, 7306.20.30.00,
7306.20.40.00, 7306.20.60.10,
7306.20.60.50, 7306.20.80.10, and
7306.20.80.50.
The HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes.
Our written description of the scope of
this order is dispositive.
Rescission of Review
On October 24, 2005, Siderca
informed the Department that it did not
ship OCTG to the United States during
the POR, and requested that we rescind
the administrative review. The
Department subsequently obtained and
reviewed entry documents from CBP,
and found no evidence that Siderca had
knowledge that any of its production
was destined for the United States. In a
February 2, 2006, letter to parties, we
requested comments from parties on
this determination, and received no
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
comments. Therefore, based on our
review of CBP documents, we are
satisfied that there were no entries of
subject merchandise subject to this
administrative review. Accordingly, we
are rescinding the review.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the
Department may rescind an
administrative review, in whole or with
respect to a particular exporter or
producer, if the Secretary concludes
that, during the period covered by the
review, there were no entries, exports,
or sales of the subject merchandise.
Because the evidence on the record
shows that there were no entries of
OCTG made by Siderca during the POR,
the Department is rescinding this review
in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(3). The Department will
issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP within fifteen days
of publication of this notice.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (as
amended) and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: March 13, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–3988 Filed 3–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–475–820]
Notice of Initiation and Preliminary
Results of Changed Circumstances
Antidumping Duty Review: Stainless
Steel Wire Rod from Italy
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) has received
information sufficient to warrant
initiation of a changed circumstances
review of the antidumping duty order
on stainless steel wire rod (SSWR) from
Italy. Based on this information, we
preliminarily determine that: 1)
Acciaierie Valbruna S.p.A. (Valbruna
S.p.A.) is the successor–in-interest to
Acciaierie Valbruna S.r.l. (Valbruna
S.r.l.) and its subsidiary Acciaierie
Bolzano S.p.A. (Bolzano S.p.A.), a
respondent in the less–than-fair–value
(LTFV) investigation; and 2)
merchandise from Acciaierie Valbruna
S.p.A. should be excluded from the
antidumping duty order. Interested
parties are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 20, 2006.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 2006 / Notices
Irina
Itkin or Alice Gibbons, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–0656 and (202)
482–0498, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
On September 15, 1998, the
Department published in the Federal
Register (63 FR 49327) the antidumping
duty order on SSWR from Italy.
Valbruna S.r.l. and its affiliate Bolzano
S.p.A. were excluded from the order
because their dumping margin was de
minimis. On January 26, 2006, Valbruna
S.p.A. submitted a written request that
the Department conduct a changed
circumstances review in order to clarify
for U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) that Valbruna S.p.A. is the
successor–in-interest to Valbruna S.r.l./
Bolzano S.p.A. and that subject
merchandise produced by this entity
should not be subject to antidumping
duties. Valbruna S.p.A. requested that
the result of the Department’s changed
circumstances review be retroactive to
December 16, 1998, the effective date of
Valbruna S.r.l.’s name and corporate
change to Valbruna S.p.A. On January
30, 2006, the Department requested that
Valbruna S.p.A. supplement this request
for a changed circumstances review by
addressing the four factors normally
examined by the Department in
successor–in-interest determinations:
changes in (1) Management; (2)
production facilities; (3) supplier
relationships; and (4) customer base. On
February 8, 2006, Valbruna submitted
this information to the Department.
Further, on March 7, 2006, Valbruna
S.p.A. submitted information to address
additional questions raised by the
Department on March 3, 2006.
Scope of Order
For purposes of this order, SSWR
comprises products that are hot–rolled
or hot–rolled annealed and/or pickled
and/or descaled rounds, squares,
octagons, hexagons or other shapes, in
coils, that may also be coated with a
13965
lubricant containing copper, lime or
oxalate. SSWR is made of alloy steels
containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or
less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more
of chromium, with or without other
elements. These products are
manufactured only by hot–rolling or
hot–rolling, annealing, and/or pickling
and/or descaling, are normally sold in
coiled form, and are of solid crosssection. The majority of SSWR sold in
the United States is round in crosssectional shape, annealed and pickled,
and later cold–finished into stainless
steel wire or small–diameter bar.
The most common size for such
products is 5.5 millimeters or 0.217
inches in diameter, which represents
the smallest size that normally is
produced on a rolling mill and is the
size that most wire–drawing machines
are set up to draw. The range of SSWR
sizes normally sold in the United States
is between 0.20 inches and 1.312 inches
diameter. Two stainless steel grades,
SF20T and K–M35FL, are excluded
from the scope of the order. The
chemical makeup for the excluded
grades is as follows:
SF20T
Carbon .........................................................................................
Manganese ..................................................................................
Phosphorous ................................................................................
Sulfur ............................................................................................
Silicon ..........................................................................................
0.05
2.00
0.05
0.15
1.00
max
max
max
max
max
Chromium
Molybdenum
Lead
Tellurium
19.00/21.00
1.50/2.50
added (0.10/0.30)
added (0.03 min)
0.015 max
0.70/1.00
0.40 max
0.04 max
0.03 max
Nickel
Chromium
Lead
Aluminum
0.30 max
12.50/14.00
0.10/0.30
0.20/0.35
K–M35FL
Carbon .........................................................................................
Silicon ..........................................................................................
Manganese ..................................................................................
Phosphorous ................................................................................
Sulfur ............................................................................................
The products subject to this order are
currently classifiable under subheadings
7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015,
7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, and
7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise is dispositive.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Initiation and Preliminary Results of
Review
In its January 26, 2006, February 8,
2006, and March 7, 2006, submissions
to the Department, Valbruna S.p.A.
provided information to the Department
to demonstrate that it is the successor–
in-interest to Valbruna S.r.l./Bolzano
S.p.A. and that subject merchandise
produced by it should not be subject to
antidumping duties given that Valbruna
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:35 Mar 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
S.r.l./Bolzano S.p.A. were excluded
from the antidumping duty order. See
63 FR 49327 (Sept. 15, 1998).
Thus, in accordance with section
751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.216
and 351.221(a), the Department is
initiating a changed circumstances
review to determine whether Valbruna
S.p.A. is the successor–in-interest to
Valbruna S.r.l./Bolzano S.p.A. and thus
entitled to exclusion from the
antidumping duty order on SSWR from
Italy.
Valbruna S.p.A. has presented
evidence to establish a prima facie case
that neither its change in corporate form
and name from Valbruna S.r.l. to
Valbruna S.p.A. nor its subsequent
merger with its wholly owned
subsidiary, Bolzano S.p.A., affected the
company’s operations (i.e.,
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
management, production facilities,
supplier relationships, or customer
relationships) so that they are materially
dissimilar to those of its predecessor. As
a consequence, we find that it is
appropriate to issue the preliminary
results of our review in combination
with the notice of initiation of the
changed circumstances review in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(c)(3)(ii). Because the evidence
indicates that Valbruna S.p.A. has the
same corporate structure and operations
as Valbruna S.r.l./Bolzano S.p.A., we
preliminarily determine that
merchandise from Valbruna S.p.A.
should be excluded from the
antidumping duty order. Thus, if these
preliminary results are adopted in our
final results of this changed
circumstances review, we will instruct
CBP to liquidate, without regard to
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
13966
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 2006 / Notices
antidumping duties, all entries entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after December 16,
1998, the date of Valbruna S.r.l.’s name
change to Valbruna S.p.A. This action is
in accordance with the Department’s
practice of applying the results of
changed circumstances determinations
retroactively where the company in
question was never subject to the order.
See Certain Hot–Rolled Lead and
Bismuth Carbon Steel Products from the
United Kingdom: Final Results of
Changed–Circumstances Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review, 64 FR 66880, 66881 (Nov. 30,
1999). For further discussion of this
issue, see the memorandum from Irene
Darzenta Tzafolias to Stephen J. Claeys,
entitled ‘‘Successor–In-Interest
Determination for Acciaierie Valbruna
S.r.l. in the Changed Circumstances
Review of Stainless Steel Wire Rod from
Italy,’’ dated concurrently with this
notice.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
Any written comments may be
submitted no later than 14 days after
date of publication of this notice.
Rebuttal briefs, limited to arguments
raised in case briefs, are due five days
after the case brief deadline. Case briefs
and rebuttal briefs must be served on
interested parties in accordance with 19
CFR 351.209. The Department will
publish the final results of the changed
circumstances review including the
results of its analysis of any issues
raised in any such comments.
This initiation of review, preliminary
results of review, and notice are in
accordance with sections 751(b) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 13, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–3990 Filed 3–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–489–806]
Certain Pasta From Turkey: Extension
of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of
the Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: March 20, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brandon Farlander or Audrey Twyman,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:35 Mar 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0182 and (202)
482–3534, respectively.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Background
Marine Mammal Authorization Program
Integration of Registration for Selected
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean Fisheries
On July 24, 1996, the Department
published in the Federal Register (61
FR 38546) the countervailing duty order
on certain pasta from Turkey. On July 1,
2005, the Department published in the
Federal Register a notice of
‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review’’ of this countervailing duty
order (70 FR 38099). We received one
request for review on July 29, 2005, and
initiated the review for calendar year
2004, on August 29, 2005 (70 FR 51009).
The preliminary results for this review
are currently due no later than April 3,
2006.
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results
Section 7512(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
requires the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) to issue the preliminary
results of an administrative review
within 245 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of an order for which
a review is requested and the final
results of review within 120 days after
the date on which the preliminary
results are published. If it is not
practicable to complete the review
within the time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend these deadlines to
a maximum of 365 days and 180 days,
respectively.
We currently analyzing supplemental
information provided by the respondent
and the Government of Turkey in this
review. Because the Department
requires additional time to review,
analyze, and, if necessary, to issue
additional supplemental questionnaires,
it is not practicable to complete this
review within the originally anticipated
time limit (i.e., by April 3, 2006).
Therefore, the Department is extending
the time limit for completion of the
preliminary results to not later than
June 5, 2006, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 14, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 06–2647 Filed 3–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 031006C]
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of integrated registration
program for Southeast fisheries.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS is providing notice that
it is increasing the number of fisheries
for which the Marine Mammal
Authorization Program (MMAP)
registration is integrated with existing
state and Federal fishery licensing and
permitting programs. NMFS is
integrating MMAP registration for state
fisheries permitted through the states of
North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia,
Florida, Louisiana, Alabama,
Mississippi, Texas, Puerto Rico, and the
U.S. Virgin Islands.
ADDRESSES: For east coast fisheries,
MMAP marine mammal injury/
mortality reporting forms may be
obtained at the following Web address:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/
interactions/
mmaplreportinglform.pdf or from the
following office:
NMFS, Southeast Regional office,
Protected Resources Division, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701,
Attn: Teletha Mincey.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vicki Cornish, Southeast Regional
Office, 727–824–5312; or Patricia
Lawson, Office of Protected Resources,
301-713-2322. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Eastern time,
Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) prohibits the taking (defined as
actual or attempted harassment, hunt,
capture, or kill) of marine mammals,
with certain exceptions. The MMAP
provides an authorization for
commercial fishermen that allows the
incidental (i.e., non-intentional) taking
of marine mammals during the course of
commercial fishing operations. NMFS
must annually publish a List of
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13964-13966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-3990]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-475-820]
Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed
Circumstances Antidumping Duty Review: Stainless Steel Wire Rod from
Italy
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) has received
information sufficient to warrant initiation of a changed circumstances
review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel wire rod (SSWR)
from Italy. Based on this information, we preliminarily determine that:
1) Acciaierie Valbruna S.p.A. (Valbruna S.p.A.) is the successor-in-
interest to Acciaierie Valbruna S.r.l. (Valbruna S.r.l.) and its
subsidiary Acciaierie Bolzano S.p.A. (Bolzano S.p.A.), a respondent in
the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation; and 2) merchandise from
Acciaierie Valbruna S.p.A. should be excluded from the antidumping duty
order. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary
results.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 20, 2006.
[[Page 13965]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irina Itkin or Alice Gibbons, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-0656
and (202) 482-0498, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 15, 1998, the Department published in the Federal
Register (63 FR 49327) the antidumping duty order on SSWR from Italy.
Valbruna S.r.l. and its affiliate Bolzano S.p.A. were excluded from the
order because their dumping margin was de minimis. On January 26, 2006,
Valbruna S.p.A. submitted a written request that the Department conduct
a changed circumstances review in order to clarify for U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) that Valbruna S.p.A. is the successor-in-
interest to Valbruna S.r.l./Bolzano S.p.A. and that subject merchandise
produced by this entity should not be subject to antidumping duties.
Valbruna S.p.A. requested that the result of the Department's changed
circumstances review be retroactive to December 16, 1998, the effective
date of Valbruna S.r.l.'s name and corporate change to Valbruna S.p.A.
On January 30, 2006, the Department requested that Valbruna S.p.A.
supplement this request for a changed circumstances review by
addressing the four factors normally examined by the Department in
successor-in-interest determinations: changes in (1) Management; (2)
production facilities; (3) supplier relationships; and (4) customer
base. On February 8, 2006, Valbruna submitted this information to the
Department. Further, on March 7, 2006, Valbruna S.p.A. submitted
information to address additional questions raised by the Department on
March 3, 2006.
Scope of Order
For purposes of this order, SSWR comprises products that are hot-
rolled or hot-rolled annealed and/or pickled and/or descaled rounds,
squares, octagons, hexagons or other shapes, in coils, that may also be
coated with a lubricant containing copper, lime or oxalate. SSWR is
made of alloy steels containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or less of
carbon and 10.5 percent or more of chromium, with or without other
elements. These products are manufactured only by hot-rolling or hot-
rolling, annealing, and/or pickling and/or descaling, are normally sold
in coiled form, and are of solid cross-section. The majority of SSWR
sold in the United States is round in cross-sectional shape, annealed
and pickled, and later cold-finished into stainless steel wire or
small-diameter bar.
The most common size for such products is 5.5 millimeters or 0.217
inches in diameter, which represents the smallest size that normally is
produced on a rolling mill and is the size that most wire-drawing
machines are set up to draw. The range of SSWR sizes normally sold in
the United States is between 0.20 inches and 1.312 inches diameter. Two
stainless steel grades, SF20T and K-M35FL, are excluded from the scope
of the order. The chemical makeup for the excluded grades is as
follows:
SF20T
Carbon............................... 0.05 max Chromium 19.00/21.00
Manganese............................ 2.00 max Molybdenum 1.50/2.50
Phosphorous.......................... 0.05 max Lead added (0.10/0.30)
Sulfur............................... 0.15 max Tellurium added (0.03 min)
Silicon.............................. 1.00 max
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
K-M35FL
Carbon............................... 0.015 max Nickel 0.30 max
Silicon.............................. 0.70/1.00 Chromium 12.50/14.00
Manganese............................ 0.40 max Lead 0.10/0.30
Phosphorous.......................... 0.04 max Aluminum 0.20/0.35
Sulfur............................... 0.03 max
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The products subject to this order are currently classifiable under
subheadings 7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, and
7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise is
dispositive.
Initiation and Preliminary Results of Review
In its January 26, 2006, February 8, 2006, and March 7, 2006,
submissions to the Department, Valbruna S.p.A. provided information to
the Department to demonstrate that it is the successor-in-interest to
Valbruna S.r.l./Bolzano S.p.A. and that subject merchandise produced by
it should not be subject to antidumping duties given that Valbruna
S.r.l./Bolzano S.p.A. were excluded from the antidumping duty order.
See 63 FR 49327 (Sept. 15, 1998).
Thus, in accordance with section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.216 and 351.221(a), the Department
is initiating a changed circumstances review to determine whether
Valbruna S.p.A. is the successor-in-interest to Valbruna S.r.l./Bolzano
S.p.A. and thus entitled to exclusion from the antidumping duty order
on SSWR from Italy.
Valbruna S.p.A. has presented evidence to establish a prima facie
case that neither its change in corporate form and name from Valbruna
S.r.l. to Valbruna S.p.A. nor its subsequent merger with its wholly
owned subsidiary, Bolzano S.p.A., affected the company's operations
(i.e., management, production facilities, supplier relationships, or
customer relationships) so that they are materially dissimilar to those
of its predecessor. As a consequence, we find that it is appropriate to
issue the preliminary results of our review in combination with the
notice of initiation of the changed circumstances review in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii). Because the evidence indicates that
Valbruna S.p.A. has the same corporate structure and operations as
Valbruna S.r.l./Bolzano S.p.A., we preliminarily determine that
merchandise from Valbruna S.p.A. should be excluded from the
antidumping duty order. Thus, if these preliminary results are adopted
in our final results of this changed circumstances review, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate, without regard to
[[Page 13966]]
antidumping duties, all entries entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after December 16, 1998, the date of Valbruna
S.r.l.'s name change to Valbruna S.p.A. This action is in accordance
with the Department's practice of applying the results of changed
circumstances determinations retroactively where the company in
question was never subject to the order. See Certain Hot-Rolled Lead
and Bismuth Carbon Steel Products from the United Kingdom: Final
Results of Changed-Circumstances Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review, 64 FR 66880, 66881 (Nov. 30, 1999). For further
discussion of this issue, see the memorandum from Irene Darzenta
Tzafolias to Stephen J. Claeys, entitled ``Successor-In-Interest
Determination for Acciaierie Valbruna S.r.l. in the Changed
Circumstances Review of Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Italy,'' dated
concurrently with this notice.
Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary
results. Any written comments may be submitted no later than 14 days
after date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to
arguments raised in case briefs, are due five days after the case brief
deadline. Case briefs and rebuttal briefs must be served on interested
parties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.209. The Department will publish
the final results of the changed circumstances review including the
results of its analysis of any issues raised in any such comments.
This initiation of review, preliminary results of review, and
notice are in accordance with sections 751(b) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 13, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-3990 Filed 3-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S