Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to Optional Routing of Orders in Nasdaq's INET Facility, 14043-14045 [E6-3959]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 2006 / Notices under the Act by the compliance date. Applicants also note that the Commission has proposed rule 15a–5 under the Act and agree that the requested order will expire on the effective date of rule 15a–5 under the Act, if adopted.3 wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES Applicants’ Conditions Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief will be subject to the following conditions: 1. Before a Fund may rely on the requested order, the operation of the Fund in the manner described in the application will be approved by a majority of the Fund’s outstanding voting securities, as defined in the Act, or, in the case of a Fund whose public shareholders purchase shares on the basis of a prospectus containing the disclosure contemplated by condition 2 below, by the initial shareholder(s) before offering shares of that Fund to the public. 2. Each Fund will disclose in its prospectus the existence, substance and effect of any order granted pursuant to the application. In addition, each Fund will hold itself out to the public as employing the management structure described in the application. The prospectus will prominently disclose that the Adviser has the ultimate responsibility (subject to oversight by the Board) to oversee Subadvisers and recommend their hiring, termination, and replacement. 3. Each Fund will comply with the fund governance standards set forth in rule 0–1(a)(7) under the Act by the compliance date for the rule (‘‘Compliance Date’’). Prior to the Compliance Date, a majority of the Board will be Independent Directors, and the nomination of new or additional Independent Directors will be at the discretion of the then-existing Independent Directors. 4. The Adviser will not enter into a Subadvisory Agreement with any Affiliated Subadviser without that agreement, including the compensation to be paid thereunder, being approved by the shareholders of the applicable Fund. 5. When a Subadviser change is proposed for a Fund with an Affiliated Subadviser, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Directors, will make a separate finding, reflected in the Board minutes, that the change is in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders and does not involve a conflict of interest from which the Adviser or the Affiliated Subadviser derives an inappropriate advantage. 6. Within 90 days of the hiring of a new Subadviser, shareholders of the affected Fund will be furnished all information about the new Subadviser that would be contained in a proxy statement. Each Fund will meet this condition by providing shareholders with an information statement meeting the requirements of Regulation 14C, Schedule 14C and Item 22 of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 within 90 days of the hiring of a new Subadviser. 7. The Adviser will provide general management services to each Fund, including overall supervisory responsibility for the general management and investment of each Fund’s assets, and, subject to review and approval by the Board, will (a) Set the Fund’s overall investment strategies; (b) evaluate, select, and recommend Subadvisers to manage all or part of the Fund’s assets; (c) when appropriate, allocate and reallocate a Fund’s assets among multiple Subadvisers; (d) monitor and evaluate the performance of Subadvisers; and (e) implement procedures reasonably designed to ensure that the Subadvisers comply with each Fund’s investment objectives, policies and restrictions. 8. No director or officer of the Company, or director, manager or officer of the Adviser, will own, directly or indirectly (other than through a pooled investment vehicle that is not controlled by that director, manager or officer), any interest in a Subadviser, except for (a) ownership of interests in the Adviser or any entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the Adviser, or (b) ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding securities of any class of equity or debt of a publiclytraded company that is either a Subadviser or an entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with a Subadviser. 9. The requested order will expire on the effective date of rule 15a–5 under the Act, if adopted. For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated authority. Nancy M. Morris, Secretary. [FR Doc. E6–3958 Filed 3–17–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010–01–P 3 Investment Company Act Release No. 26230 (Oct. 23, 2003). VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:35 Mar 17, 2006 Jkt 208001 14043 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–53474; File No. SR–NASD– 2006–022] Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to Optional Routing of Orders in Nasdaq’s INET Facility March 13, 2006. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on February 10, 2006, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.(‘‘NASD’’), through its subsidiary, the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (‘‘Nasdaq’’), submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by Nasdaq. Nasdaq filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 which renders it effective upon filing with the Commission. On March 9, 2006, Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.4 The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change Nasdaq proposes to create a new voluntary routing option for its INET facility that will allow INET users to instruct that orders being ultimately directed to the New York Stock Exchange or the American Stock Exchange first check INET and then the Nasdaq Market Center and/or Nasdaq’s Brut facility for potential execution before being delivered to those exchanges. Nasdaq will implement the proposed rule change immediately. The text of the proposed rule change is below. Proposed new language is in italics; deletions are in [brackets].5 * * * * * 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 4 Amendment No. 1 made a non-substantive, clarifying change to the rule text, as well as provided rationale for the request for the Commission to accelerate the operative delay. 5 Changes are marked to the rule text that appears in the electronic NASD Manual found at www.nasd.com. Prior to the date when The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (‘‘NASDAQ LLC’’) commences operations, NASDAQ LLC will file a conforming change to the rules of NASDAQ LLC 2 17 Continued PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM 20MRN1 14044 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 2006 / Notices 4956. Routing (a) INET Order Routing Process (1) The INET Order Routing Process shall be available to Participants from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Eastern Time, and shall route orders as described below: (A) Exchange-Listed Routing Options The System provides [five] six routing options for orders in exchange-listed securities. Of these [five] six, only [two] three—DOT Immediate, [and] DOT Alternative and DOT Nasdaq—are available for orders ultimately sought to be directed to either the New York Stock Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’) or the American Stock Exchange (‘‘AMEX’’). The System also allows firms to send individual orders to the NYSE Direct + System, and to elect to have orders not be sent to the AMEX. The [five] six System routing options for NYSE and/or Amex listed orders are: (i)–(v) No Change. (vi) DOT Nasdaq (‘‘DOTN’’)—under this option, after checking the INET System for available shares, orders are sent to other available market centers that are owned by Nasdaq, including the Nasdaq Market Center and/or Nasdaq’s Brut Facility for potential execution before the destination exchange. When checking the INET book, the System will seek to execute at the price it would send the order to a non-INET destination market center as designated by the entering party. Any un-executed portion will thereafter be sent to the NYSE or AMEX, as appropriate, at the order’s original limit order price. This option may only be used for orders with time-in-force parameters of either DAY, IOC, or market-on-open/close. (B)–(C) No Change. * * * * * wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. approved in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53128 (January 13, 2006). VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:35 Mar 17, 2006 Jkt 208001 A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose Nasdaq proposes to create a new voluntary routing option for its INET facility that will allow INET users to instruct that orders being ultimately directed to the New York Stock Exchange or the American Stock Exchange first check INET and then the Nasdaq Market Center and/or Nasdaq’s Brut facility for potential execution before being delivered to those exchanges. Nasdaq believes that the above option will enhance the choices available to INET systems users to select the best method to execute proprietary and customer orders across multiple trading venues, and is similar to routing options available through Nasdaq’s Brut facility. In addition, this routing option will allow users to maximize their participation across Nasdaq-owned trading venues so as to take advantage of available volume-based execution fee discounts resulting from activity on all Nasdaq systems. Like all Nasdaq system routing options, applicable principles of best-execution apply to the use of this proposed routing option. 2. Statutory Basis Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with Section 15A of the Act,6 in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,7 in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited nor received. 6 15 7 15 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78o–3. U.S.C. 78o–3(6). Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Nasdaq has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 8 and subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4 thereunder.9 Because the foregoing proposed rule change: (1) Does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition; and (3) does not become operative for 30 days from the date of filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b– 4(f)(6) thereunder. As required under Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii), Nasdaq provided the Commission with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at least five business days prior to filing the proposal with the Commission or such shorter period as designated by the Commission. Nasdaq has requested that the Commission waive 30-day delayed operational date provisions contained in the above rule, based upon a representation that the proposed rule filing would benefit investors and permit them to select the execution venues that best suit their trading goals, and should, therefore, be provided to investors as soon as possible. For this reason, the Commission designates the proposal to be effective and operative upon filing with the Commission. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.10 IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with 8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 10 The effective date of the original proposed rule change is February 10, 2006 and the effective date of Amendment No. 1 is March 9, 2006. For purposes of calculating the 60-day period within which the Commission may summarily abrogate the proposed rule change, as amended, under section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission considers the period to commence on March 9, 2006, the date on which Nasdaq submitted Amendment No. 1. See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C). 9 17 E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM 20MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 2006 / Notices 14045 the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION any purpose other than seeking the best execution of the entire order. Electronic Comments [Release No. 34–53469; File No. SR–PCX– 2006–10] II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–NASD–2006–022 on the subject line. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Trade Shredding March 10, 2006. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on February • Send paper comments in triplicate 3, 2006, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, (‘‘PCX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule 20549–1090. change as described in Items I, II and III All submissions should refer to File below, which Items have been prepared Number SR–NASD–2006–022. This file by the Exchange.3 The Commission is number should be included on the publishing this notice to solicit subject line if e-mail is used. To help the comment on the proposed rule change Commission process and review your from interested persons. comments more efficiently, please use I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s only one method. The Commission will Statement of the Terms of Substance of post all comments on the Commission’s the Proposed Rule Change Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ The Exchange, through its wholly rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the owned subsidiary NYSE Arca Equities, submission, all subsequent Inc., proposes to amend its rules amendments, all written statements governing the NYSE Arca Marketplace, with respect to the proposed rule the equities trading facility of the NYSE change that are filed with the Arca Equities, Inc. With this filing, the Commission, and all written Exchange proposes to amend its rules to communications relating to the prohibit the practice of splitting orders proposed rule change between the into multiple smaller orders for any Commission and any person, other than purpose other than seeking the best those that may be withheld from the execution of the entire order. The text public in accordance with the of the proposed rule change appears provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be below. Additions are in italics. available for inspection and copying in Rules of NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. the Commission’s Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will be Rule 6 Business Conduct available for inspection and copying at Prohibited Acts the principal office of Nasdaq. All comments received will be posted Rule 6.2 Any ETP Holder or any associated person thereof found guilty without change; the Commission does in accordance with the Rules and not edit personal identifying procedures of the Corporation of any of information from submissions. You the following prohibited acts shall be should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All subject to the imposition of penalties in accordance with the Rules of the submissions should refer to File Corporation. Number SR–NASD–2006–022 and * * * * * should be submitted on or before April (g) An ETP Holder may not split any 10, 2006. order into multiple smaller orders for wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES Paper Comments For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.11 Nancy M. Morris, Secretary. [FR Doc. E6–3959 Filed 3–17–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010–01–P 11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:35 Mar 17, 2006 Jkt 208001 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(l). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 On March 6, 2006, the Exchange filed with the Commission a proposed rule change, which was effective upon filing, to change the name of the Exchange, as well as several other related entities, to reflect the recent acquisition of PCX by Archipelago Holdings, Inc. (‘‘Archipelago’’) and the merger of the NYSE with Archipelago. See File No. SR–PCX–2006–24. All references herein have been changed to reflect the aforementioned rule change. 2 17 PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received regarding the proposal. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 6 (Business Conduct) to prohibit trade shredding. More specifically, the Exchange is proposing to add language to its existing rules to prohibit Equity Trading Permit Holders (‘‘ETP Holders’’) from splitting large orders into multiple smaller orders for any purpose other than best execution. 2. Statutory Basis The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,4 in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,5 in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system, and in general, to protect investors and the public interest. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. 4 15 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM 20MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14043-14045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-3959]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-53474; File No. SR-NASD-2006-022]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities 
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed 
Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to Optional Routing of 
Orders in Nasdaq's INET Facility

March 13, 2006.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on February 10, 2006, the National Association of Securities Dealers, 
Inc.(``NASD''), through its subsidiary, the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. 
(``Nasdaq''), submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and 
II below, which Items have been prepared by Nasdaq. Nasdaq filed the 
proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ 
which renders it effective upon filing with the Commission. On March 9, 
2006, Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\4\ The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ Amendment No. 1 made a non-substantive, clarifying change to 
the rule text, as well as provided rationale for the request for the 
Commission to accelerate the operative delay.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Nasdaq proposes to create a new voluntary routing option for its 
INET facility that will allow INET users to instruct that orders being 
ultimately directed to the New York Stock Exchange or the American 
Stock Exchange first check INET and then the Nasdaq Market Center and/
or Nasdaq's Brut facility for potential execution before being 
delivered to those exchanges. Nasdaq will implement the proposed rule 
change immediately. The text of the proposed rule change is below. 
Proposed new language is in italics; deletions are in [brackets].\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Changes are marked to the rule text that appears in the 
electronic NASD Manual found at www.nasd.com. Prior to the date when 
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ LLC'') commences operations, 
NASDAQ LLC will file a conforming change to the rules of NASDAQ LLC 
approved in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53128 (January 13, 
2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

[[Page 14044]]

4956. Routing
(a) INET Order Routing Process
    (1) The INET Order Routing Process shall be available to 
Participants from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Eastern Time, and shall route orders 
as described below:
    (A) Exchange-Listed Routing Options
    The System provides [five] six routing options for orders in 
exchange-listed securities. Of these [five] six, only [two] three--DOT 
Immediate, [and] DOT Alternative and DOT Nasdaq--are available for 
orders ultimately sought to be directed to either the New York Stock 
Exchange (``NYSE'') or the American Stock Exchange (``AMEX''). The 
System also allows firms to send individual orders to the NYSE Direct + 
System, and to elect to have orders not be sent to the AMEX. The [five] 
six System routing options for NYSE and/or Amex listed orders are:
    (i)-(v) No Change.
    (vi) DOT Nasdaq (``DOTN'')--under this option, after checking the 
INET System for available shares, orders are sent to other available 
market centers that are owned by Nasdaq, including the Nasdaq Market 
Center and/or Nasdaq's Brut Facility for potential execution before the 
destination exchange. When checking the INET book, the System will seek 
to execute at the price it would send the order to a non-INET 
destination market center as designated by the entering party. Any un-
executed portion will thereafter be sent to the NYSE or AMEX, as 
appropriate, at the order's original limit order price. This option may 
only be used for orders with time-in-force parameters of either DAY, 
IOC, or market-on-open/close.
    (B)-(C) No Change.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements 
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, 
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Nasdaq proposes to create a new voluntary routing option for its 
INET facility that will allow INET users to instruct that orders being 
ultimately directed to the New York Stock Exchange or the American 
Stock Exchange first check INET and then the Nasdaq Market Center and/
or Nasdaq's Brut facility for potential execution before being 
delivered to those exchanges. Nasdaq believes that the above option 
will enhance the choices available to INET systems users to select the 
best method to execute proprietary and customer orders across multiple 
trading venues, and is similar to routing options available through 
Nasdaq's Brut facility. In addition, this routing option will allow 
users to maximize their participation across Nasdaq-owned trading 
venues so as to take advantage of available volume-based execution fee 
discounts resulting from activity on all Nasdaq systems. Like all 
Nasdaq system routing options, applicable principles of best-execution 
apply to the use of this proposed routing option.
2. Statutory Basis
    Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change, as amended, is 
consistent with Section 15A of the Act,\6\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that 
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and 
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove 
impediments to a free and open market and a national market system, 
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3.
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result 
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited 
nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Nasdaq has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \8\ and subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 
thereunder.\9\ Because the foregoing proposed rule change: (1) Does not 
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition; 
and (3) does not become operative for 30 days from the date of filing, 
or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with 
the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposed rule 
change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 
and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder. As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), Nasdaq provided the Commission with written notice of its 
intent to file the proposed rule change at least five business days 
prior to filing the proposal with the Commission or such shorter period 
as designated by the Commission. Nasdaq has requested that the 
Commission waive 30-day delayed operational date provisions contained 
in the above rule, based upon a representation that the proposed rule 
filing would benefit investors and permit them to select the execution 
venues that best suit their trading goals, and should, therefore, be 
provided to investors as soon as possible. For this reason, the 
Commission designates the proposal to be effective and operative upon 
filing with the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it 
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate 
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The effective date of the original proposed rule change is 
February 10, 2006 and the effective date of Amendment No. 1 is March 
9, 2006. For purposes of calculating the 60-day period within which 
the Commission may summarily abrogate the proposed rule change, as 
amended, under section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission 
considers the period to commence on March 9, 2006, the date on which 
Nasdaq submitted Amendment No. 1. See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change, as amended, is consistent with

[[Page 14045]]

the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-NASD-2006-022 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2006-022. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and 
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such 
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the 
principal office of Nasdaq. All comments received will be posted 
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying 
information from submissions. You should submit only information that 
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to 
File Number SR-NASD-2006-022 and should be submitted on or before April 
10, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-3959 Filed 3-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.