Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 12222-12223 [E6-3328]
Download as PDF
12222
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 46 / Thursday, March 9, 2006 / Notices
consultation is required under Section 7
of the Endangered Species Act.
Likewise, NRC determined that the
proposed action is not the type of
activity that has the potential to cause
previously unconsidered effects on
historic properties, as consultation for
site decommissioning has been
conducted previously. There are no
additional impacts to historic properties
associated with the disposal method
and location for demolition debris.
Therefore, no consultation is required
under Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act. The NRC
provided a draft of its EA to the
following individuals:
Mr. Dave Howland, Massachusetts
Department of Environmental
Protection, Western Regional Office,
436 Dwight Street, Springfield, MA
01103.
Mr. Michael Whalen, Radiation Control
Program, Massachusetts Department
of Public Health, 90 Washington
Street, Dorchester, MA 02121.
Ms. Carla A. White, Vermont
Department of Health, 108 Cherry St.,
P.O. Box 70 Burlington, VT 05402.
The owner of the property where the
blocks are currently located.
Name and address withheld from public
disclosure.
Both the MADEP and the MA
Department of Public Health noted that
the BUD previously issued by the
MADEP is not appropriate for the
removal, transport, or disposal of lowlevel radioactive waste. Therefore, based
on the subsequently identified
radioactive materials in the concrete
blocks, the MADEP does not consider
the BUD as providing adequate legal
authority for the removal of the shield
blocks from the site. Otherwise neither
the MADEP or MADPH had any issue
with the proposed NRC action.
Neither the Vermont Department of
Health or the property owner had any
comments on the proposed NRC action.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
On the basis of the environmental
assessment, the NRC concludes that the
proposed action will not have a
significant effect on the quality of the
human environment. Accordingly, the
NRC has determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement for the
proposed action.
Sources Used
—US NRC Power Reactor License:
Yankee Atomic Electric Company
Docket Number 050–00029, License
Number DPR–03.
—Yankee Atomic Electric Company,
June 6, 2005, Request for Approval of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:35 Mar 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
Proposed Procedures in Accordance
with 10 CFR part 20.2002,
(ML051650291) as supplemented on
October 31, 2005. (ML053120275)
—NRC 10 CFR 20.2002, ‘‘Method of
Obtaining Approval of Proposed
Disposal Procedures.’’
—NUREG–1640, ‘‘Radiological
Assessment for Clearance of Materials
from Nuclear Facilities.’’
—NUREG–1748, ‘‘Environmental
Review Guidance for Licensing
Actions Associated with NMSS
Programs.’’
—NUREG–0586, Supplement 1, Generic
Environmental Impact Statement of
Decommissioning of Nuclear
Facilities, November 2002.
IV. Further Information
For further details with respect to the
proposed action, see the licensee’s letter
dated June 6, 2005, (ADAMS Accession
No. ML051650291) as supplemented on
October 31, 2005. (ADAMS Accession
No. ML053120275) The NRC Public
Documents Room is located at NRC
Headquarters in Rockville, MD, and can
be contacted at (800) 397–4209.
Documents may be examined, and/or
copied for a fee, at the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR), located at One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike
(first floor), Rockville, Maryland.
Publicly available records will be
accessible electronically from the
Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System’s (ADAMS) Public
Library component on the NRC Web
site, https://www.nrc.gov (the Public
Electronic Reading Room). Persons who
do not have access to ADAMS or who
encounter problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS should
contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by
telephone at 1–800–397–4209, or 301–
415–4737, or by e-mail at pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 1st day
of March, 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Andrew Persinko,
Acting Deputy Director, Decommissioning
Directorate, Division of Waste Management
and Environmental Protection, Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E6–3338 Filed 3–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon written request, copies available
from: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension: Rule 6e–2; SEC File No. 270–177;
OMB Control No. 3235–0177.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collections of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit these existing
collections of information to the Office
of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for
extension and approval.
Rule 6e–2 (17 CFR 270.6e–2) under
the Investment Company Act of 1940
(‘‘Act’’) is an exemptive rule that
permits separate accounts, formed by
life insurance companies, to fund
certain variable life insurance products.
The rule exempts such separate
accounts from the registration
requirements under the Act, among
others, on condition that they comply
with all but certain designated
provisions of the Act and meet the other
requirements of the rule. The rule sets
forth several information collection
requirements.
Rule 6e–2 provides a separate account
with an exemption from the registration
provisions of section 8(a) of the Act if
the account files with the Commission
Form N–6EI–1, a notification of claim of
exemption.
The rule also exempts a separate
account from a number of other sections
of the Act, provided that the separate
account makes certain disclosure in its
registration statements, reports to
contractholders, proxy solicitations, and
submissions to state regulatory
authorities, as prescribed by the rule.
Paragraph (b)(9) of rule 6e–2 provides
an exemption from the requirements of
section 17(f) of the Act and imposes a
reporting burden and certain other
conditions. Section 17(f) requires that
every registered management company
meet various custody requirements for
its securities and similar investments.
Paragraph (b)(9) applies only to
management accounts that offer life
insurance contracts subject to rule 6e–
2.
Since 2003, there have been no filings
under paragraph (b)(9) of rule 6e–2 by
management accounts. Therefore, since
2003, there has been no cost or burden
to the industry regarding the
information collection requirements of
paragraph (b)(9) of rule 6e–2. In
addition, there have been no filings of
Form N–6EI–1 by separate accounts
since 2003. Therefore, there has been no
cost or burden to the industry since that
time.
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 46 / Thursday, March 9, 2006 / Notices
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this
publication. The Commission request
authorization to maintain an inventory
of one burden hour for administrative
purposes.
Please direct your written comments
to R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Office of
Information Technology, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE
Washington, DC 20549.
Dated: March 2, 2006.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–3328 Filed 3–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon written request, copies available
from: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and
Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Extension: Rule 17f–1; File No. 270–236;
OMB Control No. 3235–0222.
Form N–17f–1; File No. 270–316; OMB
Control No. 3235–0359.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit these existing
collections of information to the Office
of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for
extension and approval.
Rule 17f–1 under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (the ‘‘Act’’) [17
CFR 270.17f–1] is entitled: ‘‘Custody of
Securities with Members of National
Securities Exchanges.’’ Rule 17f–1
provides that any registered
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Mar 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
management investment company
(‘‘fund’’) that wishes to place its assets
in the custody of a national securities
exchange member may do so only under
a written contract that must be ratified
initially and approved annually by a
majority of the fund’s board of directors.
The written contract also must contain
certain specified provisions. In addition,
the rule requires an independent public
accountant to examine the fund’s assets
in the custody of the exchange member
at least three times during the fund’s
fiscal year. The rule requires the written
contract and the certificate of each
examination to be transmitted to the
Commission. The purpose of the rule is
to ensure the safekeeping of fund assets.
Commission staff estimates that each
fund makes 1 response and spends an
average of 3.5 hours annually in
complying with the rule’s
requirements.1 Commission staff
estimates that on an annual basis it
takes: (i) 0.5 hours for the board of
directors at a total cost of approximately
$1000 to review and ratify the custodial
contracts; 2 and (ii) 3 hours for the
fund’s controller at a total cost of
approximately $445 to assist the fund’s
independent public auditors in
verifying the fund’s assets.3
Approximately 60 funds rely on the rule
annually.4 Thus, the total annual
burden for rule 17f–1 is estimated to be
approximately 210 hours.5 Based on the
total costs per fund listed above, the
total cost of the rule 17f–1’s collection
1 The 1 response is the board’s approval of the
custodial contract.
2 Estimates of the number of hours are based on
conversations with individuals in the mutual fund
industry. In preparing this submission, Commission
staff randomly selected 9 funds from the pool of
Form N–17f–1 filers. The actual number of hours
may vary significantly depending on individual
fund assets. The hour burden for rule 17f–1 does
not include preparing the custody contract because
that would be part of customary and usual business
practice.
3 This estimate is based on the following
calculation: 3 × $148.38 (fund controller hourly
rate) = $445. This estimate is based on the following
calculation: 3 × $148.38 (fund controller hourly
rate) = $445. The estimated costs for all fund
professional and support staff time are based on the
average annual salaries reported for employees in
New York City in Securities Industry Association,
Management and Professional Earnings in the
Securities Industry (2003) and Securities Industry
Association, Office Salaries in the Securities
Industry (2003), which are adjusted to reflect
additional overhead costs and employee benefits.
4 Based on a review of Form N–17f–1 filings in
2004, the Commission staff estimates that 60 funds
relied on rule 17f–1 in 2005.
5 This estimate is based on the following
calculation: 60 (respondents) × 3.5 (total annual
hourly burden per respondent) = 210 hours. The
annual burden for rule 17f–1 does not include time
spent preparing Form N–17f–1. The burden for
Form N–17f–1 is included in a separate collection
of information.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12223
of information requirements is
estimated to be $86,700.6
Form N–17f–1 is entitled: ‘‘Certificate
of Accounting of Securities and Similar
Investments of a Management
Investment Company in the Custody of
Members of National Securities
Exchanges.’’ Form N–17f–1 (17 CFR
274.219) is the cover sheet for
accountant examination certificates
filed under rule 17f–1 of the Act. Rule
17f–1 requires the accountant’s
certificate of each examination be
attached to Form N–17f–1 and
transmitted to the Commission
promptly after each examination. The
form facilitates the filing of the
accountant’s certificate, and increases
the accessibility of the certificate to both
Commission’s staff and interested
investors.
Commission staff estimates that on an
annual basis it takes: (i) On average 1
hour of clerical time at a total cost of
$28 to prepare and file the Form N–17f–
1; and (ii) 1 hour for the fund’s chief
compliance officer at a total cost of $137
to review the Form N–17f–1 prior to
filing with the Commission. As noted
above, approximately 60 funds currently
file Form N–17f–1 with the
Commission, and each fund is required
to make three filings annually for a total
annual burden per fund of
approximately 6 hours. The total annual
hour burden for Form N–17f–1 is
therefore estimated to be approximately
360 hours. Based on the total costs per
fund listed above, the total cost of Form
N–17f–1’s collection of information
requirements is estimated to be
approximately $59,400.7
The estimate of average burden hours
is made solely for the purposes of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, and is not
derived from a comprehensive or even
a representative survey or study of the
costs of Commission rules. Compliance
with the collections of information
required by rule 17f–1 and Form N–17f–
1 is mandatory for funds that place their
assets in the custody of a national
securities exchange member. Responses
will not be kept confidential. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number.
The Commission requests written
comments on: (a) Whether the
collections of information are necessary
for the proper performance of the
6 This estimate is based on the following
calculation: 60 hours × $1445 (total annual cost per
fund) = $86,700.
7 This estimate is based on the following
calculation: 360 hours × $165 (total annual cost per
fund) = $59,400.
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 46 (Thursday, March 9, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12222-12223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-3328]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Upon written request, copies available from: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension: Rule 6e-2; SEC File No. 270-177; OMB Control No. 3235-
0177.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the
collections of information summarized below. The Commission plans to
submit these existing collections of information to the Office of
Management and Budget (``OMB'') for extension and approval.
Rule 6e-2 (17 CFR 270.6e-2) under the Investment Company Act of
1940 (``Act'') is an exemptive rule that permits separate accounts,
formed by life insurance companies, to fund certain variable life
insurance products. The rule exempts such separate accounts from the
registration requirements under the Act, among others, on condition
that they comply with all but certain designated provisions of the Act
and meet the other requirements of the rule. The rule sets forth
several information collection requirements.
Rule 6e-2 provides a separate account with an exemption from the
registration provisions of section 8(a) of the Act if the account files
with the Commission Form N-6EI-1, a notification of claim of exemption.
The rule also exempts a separate account from a number of other
sections of the Act, provided that the separate account makes certain
disclosure in its registration statements, reports to contractholders,
proxy solicitations, and submissions to state regulatory authorities,
as prescribed by the rule.
Paragraph (b)(9) of rule 6e-2 provides an exemption from the
requirements of section 17(f) of the Act and imposes a reporting burden
and certain other conditions. Section 17(f) requires that every
registered management company meet various custody requirements for its
securities and similar investments. Paragraph (b)(9) applies only to
management accounts that offer life insurance contracts subject to rule
6e-2.
Since 2003, there have been no filings under paragraph (b)(9) of
rule 6e-2 by management accounts. Therefore, since 2003, there has been
no cost or burden to the industry regarding the information collection
requirements of paragraph (b)(9) of rule 6e-2. In addition, there have
been no filings of Form N-6EI-1 by separate accounts since 2003.
Therefore, there has been no cost or burden to the industry since that
time.
[[Page 12223]]
Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this publication. The Commission request
authorization to maintain an inventory of one burden hour for
administrative purposes.
Please direct your written comments to R. Corey Booth, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Office of Information Technology, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549.
Dated: March 2, 2006.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-3328 Filed 3-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P