Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 11689-11690 [E6-3281]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 2006 / Notices
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the collections of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collections
of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Consideration
will be given to comments and
suggestions submitted in writing within
60 days of this publication.
Please direct your written comments
to R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Office of
Information Technology, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549.
Dated: February 28, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–3280 Filed 3–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and
Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
erjones on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
Extension:
Rule 11a–3; SEC File No. 270–321; OMB
Control No. 3235–0358.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
[44 U.S.C. 3501–3520], the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collections of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit these existing
collections of information to the Office
of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for
extension and approval.
Section 11(a) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’) [15 U.S.C.
80a–11(a)] provides that it is unlawful
for a registered open-end investment
company (‘‘fund’’) or its underwriter to
make an offer to the fund’s shareholders
or the shareholders of any other fund to
exchange the fund’s securities for
securities of the same or another fund
on any basis other than the relative net
asset values (‘‘NAVs’’) of the respective
securities to be exchanged, ‘‘unless the
terms of the offer have first been
submitted to and approved by the
Commission or are in accordance with
such rules and regulations as the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:53 Mar 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
Commission may have prescribed in
respect of such offers.’’ Section 11(a)
was designed to prevent ‘‘switching,’’
the practice of inducing shareholders of
one fund to exchange their shares for
the shares of another fund for the
purpose of exacting additional sales
charges.
Rule 11a–3 under the Act [17 CFR
270.11a–3] is an exemptive rule that
permits open-end investment
companies (‘‘funds’’), other than
insurance company separate accounts,
and funds’ principal underwriters, to
make certain exchange offers to fund
shareholders and shareholders of other
funds in the same group of investment
companies. The rule requires a fund,
among other things, (i) to disclose in its
prospectus and advertising literature the
amount of any administrative or
redemption fee imposed on an exchange
transaction, (ii) if the fund imposes an
administrative fee on exchange
transactions, other than a nominal one,
to maintain and preserve records with
respect to the actual costs incurred in
connection with exchanges for at least
six years, and (iii) give the fund’s
shareholders a sixty day notice of a
termination of an exchange offer or any
material amendment to the terms of an
exchange offer (unless the only material
effect of an amendment is to reduce or
eliminate an administrative fee, sales
load or redemption fee payable at the
time of an exchange).
The rule’s requirements are designed
to protect investors against abuses
associated with exchange offers, provide
fund shareholders with information
necessary to evaluate exchange offers
and certain material changes in the
terms of exchange offers, and enable the
Commission staff to monitor funds’ use
of administrative fees charged in
connection with exchange transactions.
There are approximately 2,300 active
open-end funds registered with the
Commission as of December 31, 2005.
The staff estimates that 25 percent of
these funds impose a non-nominal
administrative fee on exchange
transactions. The staff estimates that the
recordkeeping requirement of the rule
requires approximately 1 hour annually
of clerical time (at an estimated $23 per
hour) 1 per fund, for a total of 575 hours
for all funds (at a total annual cost of
1 All hourly rates are derived from the average
annual salaries reported for employees outside of
New York City in Securities Industry Association,
Management and Professional Earnings in the
Securities Industry (2003) and Securities Industry
Association, Office Salaries in the Securities
Industry (2003), and have been adjusted upwards
through established formulas to reflect overhead
and the increase in salaries since the report was
published.
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11689
$13,225).2 The staff estimates that 25
percent of the 2300 funds terminate an
exchange offer or make a material
change to the terms once each year, and
that the notice requirement of the rule
requires approximately 1 hour of
professional time (at an estimated $81
per hour) and 2 hours of clerical time
(at an estimated $23 per hour) per fund,
for a total of approximately 1,725 hours
for all funds to comply with the notice
requirement (at a total annual cost of
$73,025).3 The recordkeeping and notice
requirements impose a total burden of
2,300 hours on all funds (at a total
annual cost of $86,250).4 The burdens
associated with the disclosure
requirement of the rule are accounted
for in the burdens associated with the
Form N–1A registration statement for
funds.
The estimate of average burden hours
is made solely for the purposes of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, and is not
derived from a comprehensive or even
a representative survey or study of the
costs of Commission rules and forms.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number.
Written comments are requested on:
(a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information has practical utility; (b) the
accuracy of the Commission’s estimate
of the burden[s] of the collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
2 This estimate is based on the following
calculations: (2,300 funds × 0.25% = 575 funds);
(575 × 1 (clerical hour) = 575 clerical hours); (575
× $23 = $13,225 total annual cost for recordkeeping
requirement).
3 This estimate is based on the following
calculations: (2,300 (funds) × 0.25% = 575 funds);
(575 × 1 (professional hour) = 575 total professional
hours); (575 (funds) × 2 (clerical hours) = 1,150 total
clerical hours); (575 (professional hours) + 1,150
(clerical hours) = 1,725 total hours); (575
(professional hours) × $81 = $46,575 total
professional cost); (1,150 (clerical hours) × $23 =
$26,450 clerical cost); ($46,575 + $26,450 = $73,025
total annual cost).
4 This estimate is based on the following
calculations: (1,725 (notice hours) + 575
(recordkeeping hours) = 2,300 total hours); ($73,025
(notice costs) + $13,225 (recordkeeping costs) =
$86,250 total annual costs).
E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM
08MRN1
11690
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 2006 / Notices
Please direct your written comments
to R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Office of
Information Technology, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549.
Dated: February 28, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–3281 Filed 3–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
Electronic Comments
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[File No. 1–13795]
Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application
of American Vanguard Corporation To
Withdraw Its Common Stock, $.10 Par
Value, From Listing and Registration
on the American Stock Exchange LLC
March 2, 2006.
erjones on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
obligation to be registered under Section
12(b) of the Act.3
Any interested person may, on or
before March 27, 2006, comment on the
facts bearing upon whether the
application has been made in
accordance with the rules of Amex, and
what terms, if any, should be imposed
by the Commission for the protection of
investors. All comment letters may be
submitted by either of the following
methods:
On February 27, 2006, American
Vanguard Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (‘‘Issuer’’), filed an
application with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to Section 12(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 12d2–2(d)
thereunder,2 to withdraw its common
stock, $.10 par value (‘‘Security’’), from
listing and registration on the American
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘Amex’’).
On January 20, 2006, the Board of
Directors (‘‘Board’’) of the Issuer
unanimously approved resolutions to
withdraw the Security from listing on
Amex and to list the Security on the
New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘NYSE’’). The Issuer stated that the
Board determined it is in the best
interest of the Issuer to list the Security
on NYSE because: (1) NYSE’s specialist
system, which serves to control intraday
price volatility, (2) NYSE’s proposed
hybrid trading platform, which permits
speed, but also serves to arrive at the
best available trading price; and (3) to
avoid direct and indirect costs and the
division of the market resulting from
dual listing on Amex and NYSE.
The Issuer stated in its application
that it has met the requirements of
Amex Rule 18 by complying with all
applicable laws in effect in the State of
Delaware, in which it is incorporated,
and providing written notice of
withdrawal to Amex.
The Issuer’s application relates solely
to the withdrawal of the Security from
listing on Amex, and shall not affect its
continued listing on NYSE or its
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/delist.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include the
File Number 1–13795 or;
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number 1–13795. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help us process and
review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on
the Commission’s Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/delist.shtml).
Comments are also available for public
inspection and copying in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
All comments received will be posted
without change; we do not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly.
The Commission, based on the
information submitted to it, will issue
an order granting the application after
the date mentioned above, unless the
Commission determines to order a
hearing on the matter.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.4
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–3265 Filed 3–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[File No. 1–13810]
Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application
of Socket Communications Inc. To
Withdraw Its Common Stock, $.001 Par
Value, From Listing and Registration
on the Pacific Exchange, Inc.
March 2, 2006.
On February 23, 2006, Socket
Communications Inc., a Delaware
corporation, (‘‘Issuer’’), filed an
application with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to Section 12(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 12d2–2(d)
thereunder,2 to withdraw its common
stock, $.001 par value (‘‘Security’’), from
listing and registration on the Pacific
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘PCX’’).
On January 26, 2006, the Board of
Directors (‘‘Board’’) of the Issuer
approved the delisting of the Security
from listing and registration on PCX.
The Issuer stated that the reason to
withdraw the Security from PCX is that
the Security is presently dual-listed on
the Nasdaq National Market System
(‘‘Nasdaq’’) and PCX. The Issuer
believes that it no longer needs or
benefits from the dual listing.
The Issuer stated in its application
that it has complied with PCX rules by
providing PCX with the required
documents governing the withdrawal of
securities from listing and registration
on PCX.
The Issuer’s application relates solely
to withdrawal of the Security from
listing on PCX and from registration
under Section 12(b) of the Act,3 and
shall not affect its obligation to be
registered under Section 12(g) of the
Act.4
Any interested person may, on or
before March 27, 2006 comment on the
facts bearing upon whether the
application has been made in
accordance with the rules of PCX, and
what terms, if any, should be imposed
by the Commission for the protection of
investors. All comment letters may be
submitted by either of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/delist.shtml); or
15 U.S.C. 78l(d).
CFR 240.12d2–2(d).
3 15 U.S.C. 781(b).
4 15 U.S.C. 781(g).
1
2 17
1 15
2 17
3 15
U.S.C. 78l(d).
CFR 240.12d2–2(d).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:53 Mar 07, 2006
4 17
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 781(b).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(1).
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM
08MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11689-11690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-3281]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension:
Rule 11a-3; SEC File No. 270-321; OMB Control No. 3235-0358.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 [44 U.S.C. 3501-3520], the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collections of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit these
existing collections of information to the Office of Management and
Budget (``OMB'') for extension and approval.
Section 11(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') [15
U.S.C. 80a-11(a)] provides that it is unlawful for a registered open-
end investment company (``fund'') or its underwriter to make an offer
to the fund's shareholders or the shareholders of any other fund to
exchange the fund's securities for securities of the same or another
fund on any basis other than the relative net asset values (``NAVs'')
of the respective securities to be exchanged, ``unless the terms of the
offer have first been submitted to and approved by the Commission or
are in accordance with such rules and regulations as the Commission may
have prescribed in respect of such offers.'' Section 11(a) was designed
to prevent ``switching,'' the practice of inducing shareholders of one
fund to exchange their shares for the shares of another fund for the
purpose of exacting additional sales charges.
Rule 11a-3 under the Act [17 CFR 270.11a-3] is an exemptive rule
that permits open-end investment companies (``funds''), other than
insurance company separate accounts, and funds' principal underwriters,
to make certain exchange offers to fund shareholders and shareholders
of other funds in the same group of investment companies. The rule
requires a fund, among other things, (i) to disclose in its prospectus
and advertising literature the amount of any administrative or
redemption fee imposed on an exchange transaction, (ii) if the fund
imposes an administrative fee on exchange transactions, other than a
nominal one, to maintain and preserve records with respect to the
actual costs incurred in connection with exchanges for at least six
years, and (iii) give the fund's shareholders a sixty day notice of a
termination of an exchange offer or any material amendment to the terms
of an exchange offer (unless the only material effect of an amendment
is to reduce or eliminate an administrative fee, sales load or
redemption fee payable at the time of an exchange).
The rule's requirements are designed to protect investors against
abuses associated with exchange offers, provide fund shareholders with
information necessary to evaluate exchange offers and certain material
changes in the terms of exchange offers, and enable the Commission
staff to monitor funds' use of administrative fees charged in
connection with exchange transactions.
There are approximately 2,300 active open-end funds registered with
the Commission as of December 31, 2005. The staff estimates that 25
percent of these funds impose a non-nominal administrative fee on
exchange transactions. The staff estimates that the recordkeeping
requirement of the rule requires approximately 1 hour annually of
clerical time (at an estimated $23 per hour) \1\ per fund, for a total
of 575 hours for all funds (at a total annual cost of $13,225).\2\ The
staff estimates that 25 percent of the 2300 funds terminate an exchange
offer or make a material change to the terms once each year, and that
the notice requirement of the rule requires approximately 1 hour of
professional time (at an estimated $81 per hour) and 2 hours of
clerical time (at an estimated $23 per hour) per fund, for a total of
approximately 1,725 hours for all funds to comply with the notice
requirement (at a total annual cost of $73,025).\3\ The recordkeeping
and notice requirements impose a total burden of 2,300 hours on all
funds (at a total annual cost of $86,250).\4\ The burdens associated
with the disclosure requirement of the rule are accounted for in the
burdens associated with the Form N-1A registration statement for funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ All hourly rates are derived from the average annual
salaries reported for employees outside of New York City in
Securities Industry Association, Management and Professional
Earnings in the Securities Industry (2003) and Securities Industry
Association, Office Salaries in the Securities Industry (2003), and
have been adjusted upwards through established formulas to reflect
overhead and the increase in salaries since the report was
published.
\2\ This estimate is based on the following calculations: (2,300
funds x 0.25% = 575 funds); (575 x 1 (clerical hour) = 575 clerical
hours); (575 x $23 = $13,225 total annual cost for recordkeeping
requirement).
\3\ This estimate is based on the following calculations: (2,300
(funds) x 0.25% = 575 funds); (575 x 1 (professional hour) = 575
total professional hours); (575 (funds) x 2 (clerical hours) = 1,150
total clerical hours); (575 (professional hours) + 1,150 (clerical
hours) = 1,725 total hours); (575 (professional hours) x $81 =
$46,575 total professional cost); (1,150 (clerical hours) x $23 =
$26,450 clerical cost); ($46,575 + $26,450 = $73,025 total annual
cost).
\4\ This estimate is based on the following calculations: (1,725
(notice hours) + 575 (recordkeeping hours) = 2,300 total hours);
($73,025 (notice costs) + $13,225 (recordkeeping costs) = $86,250
total annual costs).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The estimate of average burden hours is made solely for the
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, and is not derived from a
comprehensive or even a representative survey or study of the costs of
Commission rules and forms. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid control number.
Written comments are requested on: (a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information has practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burden[s]
of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
[[Page 11690]]
Please direct your written comments to R. Corey Booth, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Office of Information Technology, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549.
Dated: February 28, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-3281 Filed 3-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P