Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) Management Information Reporting, 9311-9312 [E6-2524]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 36 / Thursday, February 23, 2006 / Notices
1. Be market-based and results driven.
An EDA investment will capitalize on a
region’s competitive strengths and will
positively move a regional economic
indicator measured on EDA’s Balanced
Scorecard, such as: An increased
number of higher-skill, higher-wage
jobs; increased tax revenue; or increased
private sector investment.
2. Have strong organizational
leadership. An EDA investment will
have strong leadership, relevant project
management experience, and a
significant commitment of human
resources talent to ensure a project’s
successful execution.
3. Advance productivity, innovation,
and entrepreneurship. An EDA
investment will embrace the principles
of entrepreneurship, enhance regional
clusters, and leverage and link
technology innovators and local
universities to the private sector to
create the conditions for greater
productivity, innovation, and job
creation.
4. Look beyond the immediate
economic horizon, anticipate economic
changes, and diversify the local and
regional economy. An EDA investment
will be part of an overarching, long-term
comprehensive economic development
strategy that enhances a region’s success
in achieving a rising standard of living
by supporting existing industry clusters,
developing emerging new clusters, or
attracting new regional economic
drivers.
5. Demonstrate a high degree of local
commitment by exhibiting:
• High levels of local government or
non-profit matching funds and private
sector leverage;
• Clear and unified leadership and
support by local elected officials; and
• Strong cooperation between the
business sector, relevant regional
partners and local, State and Federal
governments.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Funding Priorities
Successful applications for EDA’s
investment programs will be regionallydriven initiatives in areas of the Nation
that are underperforming and eligible
for EDA programs that meet one or more
of the following core criteria
(investment proposals that meet more
than one core criterion will be given
more favorable consideration):
1. Investments in support of longterm, coordinated and collaborative
regional economic development
approaches:
• Establish comprehensive regional
economic development strategies that
identify promising opportunities for
long-term economic growth.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Feb 22, 2006
Jkt 205001
• Exhibit demonstrable, committed
multi-jurisdictional support from
leaders across all sectors:
i. Public (e.g., mayors, city councils,
county executives, senior state
leadership);
ii. Institutional (e.g., institutions of
higher learning);
iii. Non-profit (e.g., chambers of
commerce, development
organizations); and
iv. Private (e.g., leading regional
businesses, significant regional
industry associations).
• Generate quantifiable positive
economic outcomes.
2. Investments that support
innovation and competitiveness:
• Develop and enhance the
functioning and competitiveness of
leading and emerging industry clusters
in an economic region.
• Advance technology transfer from
research institutions to the commercial
marketplace.
• Bolster critical infrastructure (e.g.,
transportation, communications,
specialized training) to prepare
economic regions to compete in the
world-wide marketplace.
3. Investments that encourage
entrepreneurship:
• Cultivate a favorable
entrepreneurial environment consistent
with regional strategies.
• Enable economic regions to identify
innovative opportunities among growthoriented small and medium-size
enterprises.
• Promote community and faithbased entrepreneurship programs aimed
at improving economic performance in
an economic region.
Additional consideration will be
given to investment proposals which
also accomplish the following:
• Respond to sudden and severe
economic dislocations (e.g., major
layoffs and/or plant closures, disasters).
• Enable BRAC-impacted
communities to transition from a
military to civilian economy.
• Advance the goals of linking
historic preservation and economic
development as outlined by Executive
Order 13287, ‘‘Preserve America.’’
The Department of Commerce PreAward Notification Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements
Administrative and national policy
requirements for all Department of
Commerce awards are contained in the
Department of Commerce Pre-Award
Notification Requirements for Grants
and Cooperative Agreements, published
in the Federal Register on December 30,
2004 (69 FR 78389). This notice may be
accessed by entering the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9311
Register volume and page number
provided in the previous sentence at the
following Internet Web site: https://
gpoaccess.gov/fr/retrieve.html.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains collection-ofinformation requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The
use of Form ED–900P has been
approved by OMB under Control
Number 0610–0094. Notwithstanding
any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any
person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with, a collection of
information subject to the requirements
of the PRA unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB Control Number.
Executive Order 12866
This notice has been determined to be
not significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
It has been determined that this notice
does not contain policies with
Federalism implications as that term is
defined in Executive Order 13132.
Administrative Procedure Act/
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Prior notice and an opportunity for
public comments are not required by the
Administrative Procedure Act or any
other law for this rule concerning
grants, benefits and contracts (5 U.S.C.
553(a)(2)). Because notice and
opportunity for comment are not
required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 or any
other law, the analytical requirements of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.) are inapplicable. Therefore,
a regulatory flexibility analysis has not
been prepared.
Sandy K. Baruah,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Economic Development.
[FR Doc. E6–2545 Filed 2–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Manufacturing
Extension Partnership (MEP)
Management Information Reporting
National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
9312
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 36 / Thursday, February 23, 2006 / Notices
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 3506
(2)(A)).
II. Method of Collection
Web forms will be used to collect and
analyze a wide range of information
from the MEP centers, which includes
customer satisfaction, center activities,
center staff, quarterly expenses and
revenues, partners and affiliates
strategic plan, operating plans, and
client success stories.
Written comments must be
submitted on or before April 24, 2006.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0693–0032.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
59.
Estimated Time per Response: 127
hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 7,493.
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$374,650.
DATES:
Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
be directed to Joe Giannamore,
Economist, National Institute of
Standards and Technology,
Manufacturing Extension Partnership,
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 4800,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899–4800, 301–
975–4614 (phone) and 301–926–3787
(fax). In addition, written comments
may be sent via e-mail to
joseph.giannamore@nist.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
I. Abstract
Sponsored by NIST, the
Manufacturing Extension Partnership
(MEP) is a national network of locally
based manufacturing extension centers
working with small manufacturers to
help them improve their productivity,
improve profitability and enhance their
economic competitiveness.
The information is collected to
provide the Manufacturing Extension
Partnership (MEP) with information
regarding MEP Center performance in
the delivery of technology, and business
solutions to U.S.-based manufacturers.
The information obtained will assist in
determining the performance of the
MEP Centers at both a local and national
level, as well as, the impact on the
national economy. Responses to the
collection of information are mandatory
per the regulations governing the
operation of the MEP Program (15 CFR
parts 290, 291, 292, and H.R. 1274—
section 2). No confidentiality for
information submitted is promised or
provided.
This collection under the Paperwork
Reduction Act received prior Office of
Management and Budget clearance in
May 2003, and this clearance expires on
May 31, 2006.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Feb 22, 2006
Jkt 205001
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and costs) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they will also become a matter of public
record.
Dated: February 16, 2006.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–2524 Filed 2–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Vessel Monitoring
Program for the Pacific Coast
Groundfish Fishery
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before April 24, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Becky Renko, (206) 526–
6110 or Becky.Renko@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
NOAA has established large-scale
depth-based management areas, referred
to as Groundfish Conservation Areas
(GCAs), where groundfish fishing is
prohibited or restricted. These areas
were specifically designed to reduce the
catch of species while allowing healthy
fisheries to continue in areas and with
gears where little incidental catch of
overfished species is likely to occur.
Because NOAA needs methods to
effectively enforce area restrictions,
certain commercial fishing vessels are
required to install and use a vessel
monitoring system (VMS) that
automatically send hourly position
reports. Exemptions from the reporting
requirement are available for inactive
vessels or vessels fishing outside the
monitored area. The vessels are also
required to declare what gear will be
used.
To ensure the integrity of the GCAs
and Rockfish Conservation Areas, a
pilot VMS program was implemented
on January 1, 2004. The pilot program
required vessels registered to Pacific
Coast groundfish fishery limited entry
permits to carry and use VMS
transceiver units while fishing off the
coasts of Washington, Oregon and
California. The VMS program coverage
is being expanded on January 1, 2007,
to include all open access fisheries in
addition to the limited entry fisheries.
A separate notice will be published
regarding the proposed rule RIN 0648–
AU08.
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9311-9312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-2524]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Manufacturing
Extension Partnership (MEP) Management Information Reporting
AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing
[[Page 9312]]
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506
(2)(A)).
Dates: Written comments must be submitted on or before April 24, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th
and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions
should be directed to Joe Giannamore, Economist, National Institute of
Standards and Technology, Manufacturing Extension Partnership, 100
Bureau Drive, Stop 4800, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-4800, 301-975-4614
(phone) and 301-926-3787 (fax). In addition, written comments may be
sent via e-mail to joseph.giannamore@nist.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
Sponsored by NIST, the Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) is
a national network of locally based manufacturing extension centers
working with small manufacturers to help them improve their
productivity, improve profitability and enhance their economic
competitiveness.
The information is collected to provide the Manufacturing Extension
Partnership (MEP) with information regarding MEP Center performance in
the delivery of technology, and business solutions to U.S.-based
manufacturers. The information obtained will assist in determining the
performance of the MEP Centers at both a local and national level, as
well as, the impact on the national economy. Responses to the
collection of information are mandatory per the regulations governing
the operation of the MEP Program (15 CFR parts 290, 291, 292, and H.R.
1274--section 2). No confidentiality for information submitted is
promised or provided.
This collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act received prior
Office of Management and Budget clearance in May 2003, and this
clearance expires on May 31, 2006.
II. Method of Collection
Web forms will be used to collect and analyze a wide range of
information from the MEP centers, which includes customer satisfaction,
center activities, center staff, quarterly expenses and revenues,
partners and affiliates strategic plan, operating plans, and client
success stories.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0693-0032.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 59.
Estimated Time per Response: 127 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 7,493.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: $374,650.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and costs) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they will also become a matter of public record.
Dated: February 16, 2006.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E6-2524 Filed 2-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-P